Zeroes of some degree of two elliptic functions
$begingroup$
Let $tau in {mathbb C}$ with $mathrm{Im} tau > 0$, $a,b in {mathbb Q}$ not both integers (it's not clear to me whether assuming only $a,b in {mathbb R}$ will make a difference to the question or not), $Lambda subset {mathbb C}$ the lattice generated by $1$ and $tau$ and $eta_1$, $eta_2$ the quasi-periods of the Weierstrass $zeta$ function $-int wp$ corresponding to $Lambda$ ( see e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weierstrass_functions), i.e. the values of the Weierstrass eta function at $1$ and $tau$.
While doing some work in algebraic geometry, I've come across the following degree $2$ elliptic function
begin{equation*}
Upsilon(z) = frac{1}{z(z-a-btau)} + sum_{omega in Lambda backslash {0}} left[ frac{1}{(z-omega)(z-omega-a-btau)} - frac{1}{omega^2} right] - frac{a eta_1 + b eta_2}{a+ b tau}
end{equation*}
Yes, this is quite similar to $wp$.
Since I know nothing about complex analysis, I'd appreaciate any help "identifying" this function -- Does it have a name, can it be expressed in particularly simple way in terms of other functions. Has it appeared anywhere else? It's extremely possible that I'm missing something simple.
What I actually need to know about this function is related to its zeroes. Clearly, it has poles at $0$ and $a+btau$, so we know the sum of the zeroes. Can its zeroes be computed? Is it easier than for $wp$? http://people.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/zagier/files/doi/10.1007/BF01453974/fulltext.pdf (I'm under the impression that $sum_{n geq 0} frac{1}{(an+b)^2}$ is harder than the other $sum_{n geq 0} frac{1}{(an+b)(an+c)}$, so maybe that's not so unlikely.)
P.S. If anyone is curious, the algebraic geometry calculation I was doing was taking place on a geometrically ruled surface over an elliptic curve $E$, specifically, the projectivization of the rank two bundle ${mathcal E}$ which fits in a nonsplit s.e.s. $0 to {mathcal O}_E to {mathcal E} to {mathcal O}_E to 0$.
complex-analysis algebraic-geometry elliptic-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $tau in {mathbb C}$ with $mathrm{Im} tau > 0$, $a,b in {mathbb Q}$ not both integers (it's not clear to me whether assuming only $a,b in {mathbb R}$ will make a difference to the question or not), $Lambda subset {mathbb C}$ the lattice generated by $1$ and $tau$ and $eta_1$, $eta_2$ the quasi-periods of the Weierstrass $zeta$ function $-int wp$ corresponding to $Lambda$ ( see e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weierstrass_functions), i.e. the values of the Weierstrass eta function at $1$ and $tau$.
While doing some work in algebraic geometry, I've come across the following degree $2$ elliptic function
begin{equation*}
Upsilon(z) = frac{1}{z(z-a-btau)} + sum_{omega in Lambda backslash {0}} left[ frac{1}{(z-omega)(z-omega-a-btau)} - frac{1}{omega^2} right] - frac{a eta_1 + b eta_2}{a+ b tau}
end{equation*}
Yes, this is quite similar to $wp$.
Since I know nothing about complex analysis, I'd appreaciate any help "identifying" this function -- Does it have a name, can it be expressed in particularly simple way in terms of other functions. Has it appeared anywhere else? It's extremely possible that I'm missing something simple.
What I actually need to know about this function is related to its zeroes. Clearly, it has poles at $0$ and $a+btau$, so we know the sum of the zeroes. Can its zeroes be computed? Is it easier than for $wp$? http://people.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/zagier/files/doi/10.1007/BF01453974/fulltext.pdf (I'm under the impression that $sum_{n geq 0} frac{1}{(an+b)^2}$ is harder than the other $sum_{n geq 0} frac{1}{(an+b)(an+c)}$, so maybe that's not so unlikely.)
P.S. If anyone is curious, the algebraic geometry calculation I was doing was taking place on a geometrically ruled surface over an elliptic curve $E$, specifically, the projectivization of the rank two bundle ${mathcal E}$ which fits in a nonsplit s.e.s. $0 to {mathcal O}_E to {mathcal E} to {mathcal O}_E to 0$.
complex-analysis algebraic-geometry elliptic-functions
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It's probably related to $zeta_Lambda(z)-zeta_Lambda(z-a-btau)$ where $zeta_Lambda$ is the Weierstrass zeta function.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 24 '18 at 8:17
$begingroup$
@Lord Shark the Unknown: yes, that is true! I forgot to say that that's how I got it, so obviously I'd prefer something different.
$endgroup$
– azaha89
Dec 24 '18 at 9:23
1
$begingroup$
Let $c = a+btau$ and $f(z) = sum_{omega in Lambda} frac{1}{(z-omega)(z-omega-c)} - frac{1_{omega ne 0}}{omega^2}$ it converges and it is $Lambda$ periodic and meromorphic with two simples poles at $0,c$ thus $f(z+c/2)$ has two simple poles at $-c/2,c/2$. Then $wp(z)-wp(c/2)$ has two simple zeros at $-c/2,c/2$ and one double pole at $0$ so $f(z+c/2) (wp(z)-wp(c/2))$ has at worst one double pole at $0$ and hence $f(z+c/2) (wp(z)-wp(c/2)) =u, wp(z)+v$ where $u= f(c/2)$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 24 '18 at 11:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $tau in {mathbb C}$ with $mathrm{Im} tau > 0$, $a,b in {mathbb Q}$ not both integers (it's not clear to me whether assuming only $a,b in {mathbb R}$ will make a difference to the question or not), $Lambda subset {mathbb C}$ the lattice generated by $1$ and $tau$ and $eta_1$, $eta_2$ the quasi-periods of the Weierstrass $zeta$ function $-int wp$ corresponding to $Lambda$ ( see e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weierstrass_functions), i.e. the values of the Weierstrass eta function at $1$ and $tau$.
While doing some work in algebraic geometry, I've come across the following degree $2$ elliptic function
begin{equation*}
Upsilon(z) = frac{1}{z(z-a-btau)} + sum_{omega in Lambda backslash {0}} left[ frac{1}{(z-omega)(z-omega-a-btau)} - frac{1}{omega^2} right] - frac{a eta_1 + b eta_2}{a+ b tau}
end{equation*}
Yes, this is quite similar to $wp$.
Since I know nothing about complex analysis, I'd appreaciate any help "identifying" this function -- Does it have a name, can it be expressed in particularly simple way in terms of other functions. Has it appeared anywhere else? It's extremely possible that I'm missing something simple.
What I actually need to know about this function is related to its zeroes. Clearly, it has poles at $0$ and $a+btau$, so we know the sum of the zeroes. Can its zeroes be computed? Is it easier than for $wp$? http://people.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/zagier/files/doi/10.1007/BF01453974/fulltext.pdf (I'm under the impression that $sum_{n geq 0} frac{1}{(an+b)^2}$ is harder than the other $sum_{n geq 0} frac{1}{(an+b)(an+c)}$, so maybe that's not so unlikely.)
P.S. If anyone is curious, the algebraic geometry calculation I was doing was taking place on a geometrically ruled surface over an elliptic curve $E$, specifically, the projectivization of the rank two bundle ${mathcal E}$ which fits in a nonsplit s.e.s. $0 to {mathcal O}_E to {mathcal E} to {mathcal O}_E to 0$.
complex-analysis algebraic-geometry elliptic-functions
$endgroup$
Let $tau in {mathbb C}$ with $mathrm{Im} tau > 0$, $a,b in {mathbb Q}$ not both integers (it's not clear to me whether assuming only $a,b in {mathbb R}$ will make a difference to the question or not), $Lambda subset {mathbb C}$ the lattice generated by $1$ and $tau$ and $eta_1$, $eta_2$ the quasi-periods of the Weierstrass $zeta$ function $-int wp$ corresponding to $Lambda$ ( see e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weierstrass_functions), i.e. the values of the Weierstrass eta function at $1$ and $tau$.
While doing some work in algebraic geometry, I've come across the following degree $2$ elliptic function
begin{equation*}
Upsilon(z) = frac{1}{z(z-a-btau)} + sum_{omega in Lambda backslash {0}} left[ frac{1}{(z-omega)(z-omega-a-btau)} - frac{1}{omega^2} right] - frac{a eta_1 + b eta_2}{a+ b tau}
end{equation*}
Yes, this is quite similar to $wp$.
Since I know nothing about complex analysis, I'd appreaciate any help "identifying" this function -- Does it have a name, can it be expressed in particularly simple way in terms of other functions. Has it appeared anywhere else? It's extremely possible that I'm missing something simple.
What I actually need to know about this function is related to its zeroes. Clearly, it has poles at $0$ and $a+btau$, so we know the sum of the zeroes. Can its zeroes be computed? Is it easier than for $wp$? http://people.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/zagier/files/doi/10.1007/BF01453974/fulltext.pdf (I'm under the impression that $sum_{n geq 0} frac{1}{(an+b)^2}$ is harder than the other $sum_{n geq 0} frac{1}{(an+b)(an+c)}$, so maybe that's not so unlikely.)
P.S. If anyone is curious, the algebraic geometry calculation I was doing was taking place on a geometrically ruled surface over an elliptic curve $E$, specifically, the projectivization of the rank two bundle ${mathcal E}$ which fits in a nonsplit s.e.s. $0 to {mathcal O}_E to {mathcal E} to {mathcal O}_E to 0$.
complex-analysis algebraic-geometry elliptic-functions
complex-analysis algebraic-geometry elliptic-functions
edited Dec 24 '18 at 7:40
dmtri
1,7712521
1,7712521
asked Dec 24 '18 at 7:33
azaha89azaha89
264
264
1
$begingroup$
It's probably related to $zeta_Lambda(z)-zeta_Lambda(z-a-btau)$ where $zeta_Lambda$ is the Weierstrass zeta function.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 24 '18 at 8:17
$begingroup$
@Lord Shark the Unknown: yes, that is true! I forgot to say that that's how I got it, so obviously I'd prefer something different.
$endgroup$
– azaha89
Dec 24 '18 at 9:23
1
$begingroup$
Let $c = a+btau$ and $f(z) = sum_{omega in Lambda} frac{1}{(z-omega)(z-omega-c)} - frac{1_{omega ne 0}}{omega^2}$ it converges and it is $Lambda$ periodic and meromorphic with two simples poles at $0,c$ thus $f(z+c/2)$ has two simple poles at $-c/2,c/2$. Then $wp(z)-wp(c/2)$ has two simple zeros at $-c/2,c/2$ and one double pole at $0$ so $f(z+c/2) (wp(z)-wp(c/2))$ has at worst one double pole at $0$ and hence $f(z+c/2) (wp(z)-wp(c/2)) =u, wp(z)+v$ where $u= f(c/2)$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 24 '18 at 11:15
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
It's probably related to $zeta_Lambda(z)-zeta_Lambda(z-a-btau)$ where $zeta_Lambda$ is the Weierstrass zeta function.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 24 '18 at 8:17
$begingroup$
@Lord Shark the Unknown: yes, that is true! I forgot to say that that's how I got it, so obviously I'd prefer something different.
$endgroup$
– azaha89
Dec 24 '18 at 9:23
1
$begingroup$
Let $c = a+btau$ and $f(z) = sum_{omega in Lambda} frac{1}{(z-omega)(z-omega-c)} - frac{1_{omega ne 0}}{omega^2}$ it converges and it is $Lambda$ periodic and meromorphic with two simples poles at $0,c$ thus $f(z+c/2)$ has two simple poles at $-c/2,c/2$. Then $wp(z)-wp(c/2)$ has two simple zeros at $-c/2,c/2$ and one double pole at $0$ so $f(z+c/2) (wp(z)-wp(c/2))$ has at worst one double pole at $0$ and hence $f(z+c/2) (wp(z)-wp(c/2)) =u, wp(z)+v$ where $u= f(c/2)$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 24 '18 at 11:15
1
1
$begingroup$
It's probably related to $zeta_Lambda(z)-zeta_Lambda(z-a-btau)$ where $zeta_Lambda$ is the Weierstrass zeta function.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 24 '18 at 8:17
$begingroup$
It's probably related to $zeta_Lambda(z)-zeta_Lambda(z-a-btau)$ where $zeta_Lambda$ is the Weierstrass zeta function.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 24 '18 at 8:17
$begingroup$
@Lord Shark the Unknown: yes, that is true! I forgot to say that that's how I got it, so obviously I'd prefer something different.
$endgroup$
– azaha89
Dec 24 '18 at 9:23
$begingroup$
@Lord Shark the Unknown: yes, that is true! I forgot to say that that's how I got it, so obviously I'd prefer something different.
$endgroup$
– azaha89
Dec 24 '18 at 9:23
1
1
$begingroup$
Let $c = a+btau$ and $f(z) = sum_{omega in Lambda} frac{1}{(z-omega)(z-omega-c)} - frac{1_{omega ne 0}}{omega^2}$ it converges and it is $Lambda$ periodic and meromorphic with two simples poles at $0,c$ thus $f(z+c/2)$ has two simple poles at $-c/2,c/2$. Then $wp(z)-wp(c/2)$ has two simple zeros at $-c/2,c/2$ and one double pole at $0$ so $f(z+c/2) (wp(z)-wp(c/2))$ has at worst one double pole at $0$ and hence $f(z+c/2) (wp(z)-wp(c/2)) =u, wp(z)+v$ where $u= f(c/2)$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 24 '18 at 11:15
$begingroup$
Let $c = a+btau$ and $f(z) = sum_{omega in Lambda} frac{1}{(z-omega)(z-omega-c)} - frac{1_{omega ne 0}}{omega^2}$ it converges and it is $Lambda$ periodic and meromorphic with two simples poles at $0,c$ thus $f(z+c/2)$ has two simple poles at $-c/2,c/2$. Then $wp(z)-wp(c/2)$ has two simple zeros at $-c/2,c/2$ and one double pole at $0$ so $f(z+c/2) (wp(z)-wp(c/2))$ has at worst one double pole at $0$ and hence $f(z+c/2) (wp(z)-wp(c/2)) =u, wp(z)+v$ where $u= f(c/2)$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 24 '18 at 11:15
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051030%2fzeroes-of-some-degree-of-two-elliptic-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051030%2fzeroes-of-some-degree-of-two-elliptic-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
It's probably related to $zeta_Lambda(z)-zeta_Lambda(z-a-btau)$ where $zeta_Lambda$ is the Weierstrass zeta function.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 24 '18 at 8:17
$begingroup$
@Lord Shark the Unknown: yes, that is true! I forgot to say that that's how I got it, so obviously I'd prefer something different.
$endgroup$
– azaha89
Dec 24 '18 at 9:23
1
$begingroup$
Let $c = a+btau$ and $f(z) = sum_{omega in Lambda} frac{1}{(z-omega)(z-omega-c)} - frac{1_{omega ne 0}}{omega^2}$ it converges and it is $Lambda$ periodic and meromorphic with two simples poles at $0,c$ thus $f(z+c/2)$ has two simple poles at $-c/2,c/2$. Then $wp(z)-wp(c/2)$ has two simple zeros at $-c/2,c/2$ and one double pole at $0$ so $f(z+c/2) (wp(z)-wp(c/2))$ has at worst one double pole at $0$ and hence $f(z+c/2) (wp(z)-wp(c/2)) =u, wp(z)+v$ where $u= f(c/2)$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 24 '18 at 11:15