Oscillating Stockfish Evaluation on Laptop
I'm using stockfish-9-bmi2 on my laptop to provide me move by move evaluation of games. I've set Stockfish to evaluate to depth = 25 plys. I find that the evaluation provided oscillates move-on-move after a certain number of moves. Below is the plot of the evaluation:
In the above plot, the ply-count is on the x-axis, the evaluation from Stockfish is on the primary y-axis (left), the Mate-In number is on the secondary y-axis (right). The Blue line with white circles is the plot of the evaluation and the red circles depict the mate-in number.
However, for the same game, when I jot down the evaluation from lichess.com's analysis board, which is also using Stockfish 9, I get a much more stable evaluation move-on-move. Lichess.com's analysis board also uses depth = 25 for most moves but can use a different number for certain moves. Below is the plot for the same:
In the above plot, the Blue line depicts the evaluation. The break in the trend is because of a Mate-In-3 on ply count = 63.
Considering that both methods use Stockfish 9 and is set to depth = 25, can someone help me with why the results on my laptop oscillates so much?
My Laptop's configuration:
- OS: MacOS High Sierra
- Processor: Intel core i7 2.2 GHz
- RAM: 16GB
- Stockfish: stockfish-9-bmi2
The game used is Praggnanandhaa vs Vishy Anand - Tata Steel Chess India Blitz 2018
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6
5. Nc3 a6 6. a3 g6 7. Be2 Bg7 8. Be3 O-O
9. Qd2 b5 10. O-O-O Bb7 11. f3 Nbd7 12. h4 Ne5
13. Bh6 Bxh6 14. Qxh6 Rc8 15. g4 Rxc3 16. bxc3 Qa5
17. Nf5 gxf5 18. gxf5 Qxc3 19. Rdg1+ Ng6 20. fxg6 fxg6
21. h5 Bxe4 22. fxe4 Qa1+ 23. Kd2 Nxe4+ 24. Ke3 Qc3+
25. Bd3 Qd2+ 26. Kxe4 Qxh6 27. hxg6 Qf4+ 28. Kd5 h6
29. g7 Rc8 30. Ke6 d5 31. Rg6 Rc6+ 32. Kxe7 Rxg6
33. Bxg6 Kxg7 34. Bd3 Qe5+ 35. Kd7 h5 36. Rg1+ Kf6
37. Rg6+ Kf7 38. Rh6 a5 39. Kc6 b4 40. axb4 axb4
41. Kd7 Kg7 42. Re6 Qd4 43. Ke8 Qg4 44. Ke7 h4
45. Be2 Qg5+ 46. Kd6 h3 47. Re7+ Kf8 48. Re5 Qf6+
49. Kxd5 h2
P.S.: I have also tried using stockfish-9-64 instead of stockfish-9-bmi2 and the results are similar
engines stockfish statistics evaluation lichess
asked Nov 25 at 8:10
codemaniac
1285
add a comment |
I'm using stockfish-9-bmi2 on my laptop to provide me move by move evaluation of games. I've set Stockfish to evaluate to depth = 25 plys. I find that the evaluation provided oscillates move-on-move after a certain number of moves. Below is the plot of the evaluation:
In the above plot, the ply-count is on the x-axis, the evaluation from Stockfish is on the primary y-axis (left), the Mate-In number is on the secondary y-axis (right). The Blue line with white circles is the plot of the evaluation and the red circles depict the mate-in number.
However, for the same game, when I jot down the evaluation from lichess.com's analysis board, which is also using Stockfish 9, I get a much more stable evaluation move-on-move. Lichess.com's analysis board also uses depth = 25 for most moves but can use a different number for certain moves. Below is the plot for the same:
In the above plot, the Blue line depicts the evaluation. The break in the trend is because of a Mate-In-3 on ply count = 63.
Considering that both methods use Stockfish 9 and is set to depth = 25, can someone help me with why the results on my laptop oscillates so much?
My Laptop's configuration:
- OS: MacOS High Sierra
- Processor: Intel core i7 2.2 GHz
- RAM: 16GB
- Stockfish: stockfish-9-bmi2
The game used is Praggnanandhaa vs Vishy Anand - Tata Steel Chess India Blitz 2018
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6
5. Nc3 a6 6. a3 g6 7. Be2 Bg7 8. Be3 O-O
9. Qd2 b5 10. O-O-O Bb7 11. f3 Nbd7 12. h4 Ne5
13. Bh6 Bxh6 14. Qxh6 Rc8 15. g4 Rxc3 16. bxc3 Qa5
17. Nf5 gxf5 18. gxf5 Qxc3 19. Rdg1+ Ng6 20. fxg6 fxg6
21. h5 Bxe4 22. fxe4 Qa1+ 23. Kd2 Nxe4+ 24. Ke3 Qc3+
25. Bd3 Qd2+ 26. Kxe4 Qxh6 27. hxg6 Qf4+ 28. Kd5 h6
29. g7 Rc8 30. Ke6 d5 31. Rg6 Rc6+ 32. Kxe7 Rxg6
33. Bxg6 Kxg7 34. Bd3 Qe5+ 35. Kd7 h5 36. Rg1+ Kf6
37. Rg6+ Kf7 38. Rh6 a5 39. Kc6 b4 40. axb4 axb4
41. Kd7 Kg7 42. Re6 Qd4 43. Ke8 Qg4 44. Ke7 h4
45. Be2 Qg5+ 46. Kd6 h3 47. Re7+ Kf8 48. Re5 Qf6+
49. Kxd5 h2
P.S.: I have also tried using stockfish-9-64 instead of stockfish-9-bmi2 and the results are similar
engines stockfish statistics evaluation lichess
asked Nov 25 at 8:10
codemaniac
1285
add a comment |
I'm using stockfish-9-bmi2 on my laptop to provide me move by move evaluation of games. I've set Stockfish to evaluate to depth = 25 plys. I find that the evaluation provided oscillates move-on-move after a certain number of moves. Below is the plot of the evaluation:
In the above plot, the ply-count is on the x-axis, the evaluation from Stockfish is on the primary y-axis (left), the Mate-In number is on the secondary y-axis (right). The Blue line with white circles is the plot of the evaluation and the red circles depict the mate-in number.
However, for the same game, when I jot down the evaluation from lichess.com's analysis board, which is also using Stockfish 9, I get a much more stable evaluation move-on-move. Lichess.com's analysis board also uses depth = 25 for most moves but can use a different number for certain moves. Below is the plot for the same:
In the above plot, the Blue line depicts the evaluation. The break in the trend is because of a Mate-In-3 on ply count = 63.
Considering that both methods use Stockfish 9 and is set to depth = 25, can someone help me with why the results on my laptop oscillates so much?
My Laptop's configuration:
- OS: MacOS High Sierra
- Processor: Intel core i7 2.2 GHz
- RAM: 16GB
- Stockfish: stockfish-9-bmi2
The game used is Praggnanandhaa vs Vishy Anand - Tata Steel Chess India Blitz 2018
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6
5. Nc3 a6 6. a3 g6 7. Be2 Bg7 8. Be3 O-O
9. Qd2 b5 10. O-O-O Bb7 11. f3 Nbd7 12. h4 Ne5
13. Bh6 Bxh6 14. Qxh6 Rc8 15. g4 Rxc3 16. bxc3 Qa5
17. Nf5 gxf5 18. gxf5 Qxc3 19. Rdg1+ Ng6 20. fxg6 fxg6
21. h5 Bxe4 22. fxe4 Qa1+ 23. Kd2 Nxe4+ 24. Ke3 Qc3+
25. Bd3 Qd2+ 26. Kxe4 Qxh6 27. hxg6 Qf4+ 28. Kd5 h6
29. g7 Rc8 30. Ke6 d5 31. Rg6 Rc6+ 32. Kxe7 Rxg6
33. Bxg6 Kxg7 34. Bd3 Qe5+ 35. Kd7 h5 36. Rg1+ Kf6
37. Rg6+ Kf7 38. Rh6 a5 39. Kc6 b4 40. axb4 axb4
41. Kd7 Kg7 42. Re6 Qd4 43. Ke8 Qg4 44. Ke7 h4
45. Be2 Qg5+ 46. Kd6 h3 47. Re7+ Kf8 48. Re5 Qf6+
49. Kxd5 h2
P.S.: I have also tried using stockfish-9-64 instead of stockfish-9-bmi2 and the results are similar
engines stockfish statistics evaluation lichess
asked Nov 25 at 8:10
codemaniac
1285
I'm using stockfish-9-bmi2 on my laptop to provide me move by move evaluation of games. I've set Stockfish to evaluate to depth = 25 plys. I find that the evaluation provided oscillates move-on-move after a certain number of moves. Below is the plot of the evaluation:
In the above plot, the ply-count is on the x-axis, the evaluation from Stockfish is on the primary y-axis (left), the Mate-In number is on the secondary y-axis (right). The Blue line with white circles is the plot of the evaluation and the red circles depict the mate-in number.
However, for the same game, when I jot down the evaluation from lichess.com's analysis board, which is also using Stockfish 9, I get a much more stable evaluation move-on-move. Lichess.com's analysis board also uses depth = 25 for most moves but can use a different number for certain moves. Below is the plot for the same:
In the above plot, the Blue line depicts the evaluation. The break in the trend is because of a Mate-In-3 on ply count = 63.
Considering that both methods use Stockfish 9 and is set to depth = 25, can someone help me with why the results on my laptop oscillates so much?
My Laptop's configuration:
- OS: MacOS High Sierra
- Processor: Intel core i7 2.2 GHz
- RAM: 16GB
- Stockfish: stockfish-9-bmi2
The game used is Praggnanandhaa vs Vishy Anand - Tata Steel Chess India Blitz 2018
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6
5. Nc3 a6 6. a3 g6 7. Be2 Bg7 8. Be3 O-O
9. Qd2 b5 10. O-O-O Bb7 11. f3 Nbd7 12. h4 Ne5
13. Bh6 Bxh6 14. Qxh6 Rc8 15. g4 Rxc3 16. bxc3 Qa5
17. Nf5 gxf5 18. gxf5 Qxc3 19. Rdg1+ Ng6 20. fxg6 fxg6
21. h5 Bxe4 22. fxe4 Qa1+ 23. Kd2 Nxe4+ 24. Ke3 Qc3+
25. Bd3 Qd2+ 26. Kxe4 Qxh6 27. hxg6 Qf4+ 28. Kd5 h6
29. g7 Rc8 30. Ke6 d5 31. Rg6 Rc6+ 32. Kxe7 Rxg6
33. Bxg6 Kxg7 34. Bd3 Qe5+ 35. Kd7 h5 36. Rg1+ Kf6
37. Rg6+ Kf7 38. Rh6 a5 39. Kc6 b4 40. axb4 axb4
41. Kd7 Kg7 42. Re6 Qd4 43. Ke8 Qg4 44. Ke7 h4
45. Be2 Qg5+ 46. Kd6 h3 47. Re7+ Kf8 48. Re5 Qf6+
49. Kxd5 h2
P.S.: I have also tried using stockfish-9-64 instead of stockfish-9-bmi2 and the results are similar
engines stockfish statistics evaluation lichess
engines stockfish statistics evaluation lichess
asked Nov 25 at 8:10
codemaniac
1285
asked Nov 25 at 8:10
codemaniac
1285
edited Nov 25 at 8:37
asked Nov 25 at 8:10
codemaniac
1285
asked Nov 25 at 8:10
codemaniac
1285
asked Nov 25 at 8:10
codemaniac
1285
1285
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
If I understand correctly your x axis is the moves. Your script implied Anand and Prag were blundering every time they make a move,
Clearly you have a bug in your script. Stockfish engine always give you a score relative to the player making the move, NOT white. You need to multiply the score by minus one if it’s Black to move.
Please do this and you will be fine.
answered Nov 25 at 8:36
SmallChess
14.1k22246
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "435"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23014%2foscillating-stockfish-evaluation-on-laptop%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If I understand correctly your x axis is the moves. Your script implied Anand and Prag were blundering every time they make a move,
Clearly you have a bug in your script. Stockfish engine always give you a score relative to the player making the move, NOT white. You need to multiply the score by minus one if it’s Black to move.
Please do this and you will be fine.
answered Nov 25 at 8:36
SmallChess
14.1k22246
add a comment |
If I understand correctly your x axis is the moves. Your script implied Anand and Prag were blundering every time they make a move,
Clearly you have a bug in your script. Stockfish engine always give you a score relative to the player making the move, NOT white. You need to multiply the score by minus one if it’s Black to move.
Please do this and you will be fine.
answered Nov 25 at 8:36
SmallChess
14.1k22246
add a comment |
If I understand correctly your x axis is the moves. Your script implied Anand and Prag were blundering every time they make a move,
Clearly you have a bug in your script. Stockfish engine always give you a score relative to the player making the move, NOT white. You need to multiply the score by minus one if it’s Black to move.
Please do this and you will be fine.
answered Nov 25 at 8:36
SmallChess
14.1k22246
If I understand correctly your x axis is the moves. Your script implied Anand and Prag were blundering every time they make a move,
Clearly you have a bug in your script. Stockfish engine always give you a score relative to the player making the move, NOT white. You need to multiply the score by minus one if it’s Black to move.
Please do this and you will be fine.
answered Nov 25 at 8:36
SmallChess
14.1k22246
answered Nov 25 at 8:36
SmallChess
14.1k22246
answered Nov 25 at 8:36
SmallChess
14.1k22246
answered Nov 25 at 8:36
SmallChess
14.1k22246
14.1k22246
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chess Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23014%2foscillating-stockfish-evaluation-on-laptop%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
