Sandwich natural transformation between two functors











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In the Kleisli adjunction we have:



$Gvarepsilon F = mu$ where $varepsilon$ is a natural transformation called the counit.



How exactly is $Gvarepsilon F$ defined? I understand $Gvarepsilon$ and $varepsilon F$ but not the sandwiched form.



Followup question: Counit of the Kleisli adjunction










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    If I call $varepsilon F$ $alpha$ and ask what is $Galpha$, do you understand it then? It's compositional. There is, of course, a coherence constraint you could verify. Namely that $Galpha = beta F$ where $beta = Gvarepsilon$. Incidentally, I personally prefer representing right whiskering by subscripting, i.e. $Gvarepsilon_F$.
    – Derek Elkins
    Nov 24 at 9:20












  • @DerekElkins I posted a followup math.stackexchange.com/questions/3011366/…
    – Roland
    Nov 24 at 9:50

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In the Kleisli adjunction we have:



$Gvarepsilon F = mu$ where $varepsilon$ is a natural transformation called the counit.



How exactly is $Gvarepsilon F$ defined? I understand $Gvarepsilon$ and $varepsilon F$ but not the sandwiched form.



Followup question: Counit of the Kleisli adjunction










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    If I call $varepsilon F$ $alpha$ and ask what is $Galpha$, do you understand it then? It's compositional. There is, of course, a coherence constraint you could verify. Namely that $Galpha = beta F$ where $beta = Gvarepsilon$. Incidentally, I personally prefer representing right whiskering by subscripting, i.e. $Gvarepsilon_F$.
    – Derek Elkins
    Nov 24 at 9:20












  • @DerekElkins I posted a followup math.stackexchange.com/questions/3011366/…
    – Roland
    Nov 24 at 9:50















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











In the Kleisli adjunction we have:



$Gvarepsilon F = mu$ where $varepsilon$ is a natural transformation called the counit.



How exactly is $Gvarepsilon F$ defined? I understand $Gvarepsilon$ and $varepsilon F$ but not the sandwiched form.



Followup question: Counit of the Kleisli adjunction










share|cite|improve this question















In the Kleisli adjunction we have:



$Gvarepsilon F = mu$ where $varepsilon$ is a natural transformation called the counit.



How exactly is $Gvarepsilon F$ defined? I understand $Gvarepsilon$ and $varepsilon F$ but not the sandwiched form.



Followup question: Counit of the Kleisli adjunction







category-theory adjoint-functors functors natural-transformations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 24 at 9:52

























asked Nov 24 at 9:14









Roland

19311




19311








  • 2




    If I call $varepsilon F$ $alpha$ and ask what is $Galpha$, do you understand it then? It's compositional. There is, of course, a coherence constraint you could verify. Namely that $Galpha = beta F$ where $beta = Gvarepsilon$. Incidentally, I personally prefer representing right whiskering by subscripting, i.e. $Gvarepsilon_F$.
    – Derek Elkins
    Nov 24 at 9:20












  • @DerekElkins I posted a followup math.stackexchange.com/questions/3011366/…
    – Roland
    Nov 24 at 9:50
















  • 2




    If I call $varepsilon F$ $alpha$ and ask what is $Galpha$, do you understand it then? It's compositional. There is, of course, a coherence constraint you could verify. Namely that $Galpha = beta F$ where $beta = Gvarepsilon$. Incidentally, I personally prefer representing right whiskering by subscripting, i.e. $Gvarepsilon_F$.
    – Derek Elkins
    Nov 24 at 9:20












  • @DerekElkins I posted a followup math.stackexchange.com/questions/3011366/…
    – Roland
    Nov 24 at 9:50










2




2




If I call $varepsilon F$ $alpha$ and ask what is $Galpha$, do you understand it then? It's compositional. There is, of course, a coherence constraint you could verify. Namely that $Galpha = beta F$ where $beta = Gvarepsilon$. Incidentally, I personally prefer representing right whiskering by subscripting, i.e. $Gvarepsilon_F$.
– Derek Elkins
Nov 24 at 9:20






If I call $varepsilon F$ $alpha$ and ask what is $Galpha$, do you understand it then? It's compositional. There is, of course, a coherence constraint you could verify. Namely that $Galpha = beta F$ where $beta = Gvarepsilon$. Incidentally, I personally prefer representing right whiskering by subscripting, i.e. $Gvarepsilon_F$.
– Derek Elkins
Nov 24 at 9:20














@DerekElkins I posted a followup math.stackexchange.com/questions/3011366/…
– Roland
Nov 24 at 9:50






@DerekElkins I posted a followup math.stackexchange.com/questions/3011366/…
– Roland
Nov 24 at 9:50

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011347%2fsandwich-natural-transformation-between-two-functors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011347%2fsandwich-natural-transformation-between-two-functors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Verónica Boquete

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten