Understanding controllability indices











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












I'm teaching myself linear control systems through various online materials and the book Linear Systems Theory and Design by Chen. I'm trying to understand controllability indices. Chen says that looking at the controllability matrix C as follows



$C=[B;AB;A^2B;...;A^nB];= [b_1;...;b_p;|;Ab_1;...;Ab_p;|;...|;A^{n-1}b_1;...;A^{n-1}b_p]$



that reading left to right, the columns are linearly independent until some column $A^ib_m$, which is dependent on the columns to the left - this makes sense - but that subsequent columns associated with $b_m$ (e.g. $A^{i+k}b_m$) are also linearly dependent on their proceeding columns, or that "once a column associated with $b_m$ becomes linearly dependent, then all columns associated with $b_m$ thereafter are linearly dependent". Unfortunately this last point isn't intuitive to me at all - if anyone can shed some light on this or help me see it I'd be very grateful!



Thanks in advance for any help.



Luke










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    I'm teaching myself linear control systems through various online materials and the book Linear Systems Theory and Design by Chen. I'm trying to understand controllability indices. Chen says that looking at the controllability matrix C as follows



    $C=[B;AB;A^2B;...;A^nB];= [b_1;...;b_p;|;Ab_1;...;Ab_p;|;...|;A^{n-1}b_1;...;A^{n-1}b_p]$



    that reading left to right, the columns are linearly independent until some column $A^ib_m$, which is dependent on the columns to the left - this makes sense - but that subsequent columns associated with $b_m$ (e.g. $A^{i+k}b_m$) are also linearly dependent on their proceeding columns, or that "once a column associated with $b_m$ becomes linearly dependent, then all columns associated with $b_m$ thereafter are linearly dependent". Unfortunately this last point isn't intuitive to me at all - if anyone can shed some light on this or help me see it I'd be very grateful!



    Thanks in advance for any help.



    Luke










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      I'm teaching myself linear control systems through various online materials and the book Linear Systems Theory and Design by Chen. I'm trying to understand controllability indices. Chen says that looking at the controllability matrix C as follows



      $C=[B;AB;A^2B;...;A^nB];= [b_1;...;b_p;|;Ab_1;...;Ab_p;|;...|;A^{n-1}b_1;...;A^{n-1}b_p]$



      that reading left to right, the columns are linearly independent until some column $A^ib_m$, which is dependent on the columns to the left - this makes sense - but that subsequent columns associated with $b_m$ (e.g. $A^{i+k}b_m$) are also linearly dependent on their proceeding columns, or that "once a column associated with $b_m$ becomes linearly dependent, then all columns associated with $b_m$ thereafter are linearly dependent". Unfortunately this last point isn't intuitive to me at all - if anyone can shed some light on this or help me see it I'd be very grateful!



      Thanks in advance for any help.



      Luke










      share|cite|improve this question













      I'm teaching myself linear control systems through various online materials and the book Linear Systems Theory and Design by Chen. I'm trying to understand controllability indices. Chen says that looking at the controllability matrix C as follows



      $C=[B;AB;A^2B;...;A^nB];= [b_1;...;b_p;|;Ab_1;...;Ab_p;|;...|;A^{n-1}b_1;...;A^{n-1}b_p]$



      that reading left to right, the columns are linearly independent until some column $A^ib_m$, which is dependent on the columns to the left - this makes sense - but that subsequent columns associated with $b_m$ (e.g. $A^{i+k}b_m$) are also linearly dependent on their proceeding columns, or that "once a column associated with $b_m$ becomes linearly dependent, then all columns associated with $b_m$ thereafter are linearly dependent". Unfortunately this last point isn't intuitive to me at all - if anyone can shed some light on this or help me see it I'd be very grateful!



      Thanks in advance for any help.



      Luke







      control-theory linear-control






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 14 '15 at 20:45









      Luke

      112




      112






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Say $A b_1$ is linearly dependent on the $b_i$, namely $A b_1 = lambda_i b_i$ (summation implicit). Then $A^2 b_1 = A lambda_i b_i = lambda_i A b_i$, so $A^2 b_1$ depends linearly on the columns $A b_i$ which are on its left.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I think this answers your question perfectly. I just want to add some intuition as I had too difficulties understanding controllability indices. The $i$th controllability index gives the dimension of the reachable space by only using the $i$th input that is not reachable by using previous inputs. Therefore, if the system is controllable, the sum of the controllability indices are $n$.
            – obareey
            Mar 16 '15 at 17:58










          • Right. Notice also that the initial ordering of the inputs may affect the list of indices.
            – Pait
            Mar 16 '15 at 19:35






          • 1




            Yes, it may affect the ordering of the indices but the values are invariant under the ordering of the inputs.
            – obareey
            Mar 16 '15 at 21:15










          • That is true. However they are not invariant under ordering of the columns of the controllability matrix, which itself is arbitrary. We're getting away from the original question but I do find this issue confusing, so it's useful to register that the concepts are indeed not completely transparent.
            – Pait
            Mar 17 '15 at 12:41


















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          I am studying the same subject now, from the same book and had exactly the same question you had.



          The answer by @Pait doesn't show that the resulting set $mathit{lambda_iAb_i}$ is a subset of the LHS vectors relative to $mathit{A^2b_1}$ in the controllability matrix. However I had understood it myself, and I will post it here for reference.



          Say $pmb{A^ib_m}$ is the first vector associated with $pmb{b_m}$ that is dependent on some of the vectors $pmb{v_k}$ at its left hand side (LHS).



          That is: $$pmb{A^ib_m}= sum_{k=1}^{i*m-1}alpha_kpmb{v_k} (1)$$
          Now, for the next vector associated with $pmb{b_m}$, i.e. $pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}$, we have: $$pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}= sum_{k=1}^{i*m-1}alpha_kpmb{Av_k} (2)$$
          Now we show (or clarify) that the set ${pmb{Av_k} | kinBbb{Z}, 1le k le (i*m-1)}$ is a subset of the vectors at LHS of $pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}$ in the controllability matrix.



          The sum in (1) can be split into:
          $$pmb{A^ib_m} = underbrace{sum_{k=0}^{i-1}alpha_{mk}^{'}pmb{A^kb_m}}_{Vectors which are\ associated with pmb{b_m}\ but are on LHS} + underbrace{(sum_{k=0}^ialpha_{1k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_1} +sum_{k=0}^ialpha_{2k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_2}+cdots+sum_{k=0}^ialpha_{(m-1)k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_{m-1}})}_{Vectors associated with pmb{b_j} columns\ which are before pmb{b_m} in the pmb{B} matrix}$$



          Now by multiplying by $pmb{A}$ on both sides:
          $$pmb{A^{i+1}b_m} = sum_{k=1}^{i}alpha_{mk}^{'}pmb{A^kb_m} + (sum_{k=1}^{i+1}alpha_{1k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_1} +sum_{k=1}^{i+1}alpha_{2k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_2}+cdots+sum_{k=1}^{i+1}alpha_{(m-1)k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_{m-1}})$$
          Clearly, the vectors in the summations are subset of the vectors that are at LHS of $pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}$ in the controllability matrix.






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1189957%2funderstanding-controllability-indices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Say $A b_1$ is linearly dependent on the $b_i$, namely $A b_1 = lambda_i b_i$ (summation implicit). Then $A^2 b_1 = A lambda_i b_i = lambda_i A b_i$, so $A^2 b_1$ depends linearly on the columns $A b_i$ which are on its left.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • I think this answers your question perfectly. I just want to add some intuition as I had too difficulties understanding controllability indices. The $i$th controllability index gives the dimension of the reachable space by only using the $i$th input that is not reachable by using previous inputs. Therefore, if the system is controllable, the sum of the controllability indices are $n$.
              – obareey
              Mar 16 '15 at 17:58










            • Right. Notice also that the initial ordering of the inputs may affect the list of indices.
              – Pait
              Mar 16 '15 at 19:35






            • 1




              Yes, it may affect the ordering of the indices but the values are invariant under the ordering of the inputs.
              – obareey
              Mar 16 '15 at 21:15










            • That is true. However they are not invariant under ordering of the columns of the controllability matrix, which itself is arbitrary. We're getting away from the original question but I do find this issue confusing, so it's useful to register that the concepts are indeed not completely transparent.
              – Pait
              Mar 17 '15 at 12:41















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Say $A b_1$ is linearly dependent on the $b_i$, namely $A b_1 = lambda_i b_i$ (summation implicit). Then $A^2 b_1 = A lambda_i b_i = lambda_i A b_i$, so $A^2 b_1$ depends linearly on the columns $A b_i$ which are on its left.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • I think this answers your question perfectly. I just want to add some intuition as I had too difficulties understanding controllability indices. The $i$th controllability index gives the dimension of the reachable space by only using the $i$th input that is not reachable by using previous inputs. Therefore, if the system is controllable, the sum of the controllability indices are $n$.
              – obareey
              Mar 16 '15 at 17:58










            • Right. Notice also that the initial ordering of the inputs may affect the list of indices.
              – Pait
              Mar 16 '15 at 19:35






            • 1




              Yes, it may affect the ordering of the indices but the values are invariant under the ordering of the inputs.
              – obareey
              Mar 16 '15 at 21:15










            • That is true. However they are not invariant under ordering of the columns of the controllability matrix, which itself is arbitrary. We're getting away from the original question but I do find this issue confusing, so it's useful to register that the concepts are indeed not completely transparent.
              – Pait
              Mar 17 '15 at 12:41













            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            Say $A b_1$ is linearly dependent on the $b_i$, namely $A b_1 = lambda_i b_i$ (summation implicit). Then $A^2 b_1 = A lambda_i b_i = lambda_i A b_i$, so $A^2 b_1$ depends linearly on the columns $A b_i$ which are on its left.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            Say $A b_1$ is linearly dependent on the $b_i$, namely $A b_1 = lambda_i b_i$ (summation implicit). Then $A^2 b_1 = A lambda_i b_i = lambda_i A b_i$, so $A^2 b_1$ depends linearly on the columns $A b_i$ which are on its left.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Mar 16 '15 at 14:34









            Pait

            1,157916




            1,157916












            • I think this answers your question perfectly. I just want to add some intuition as I had too difficulties understanding controllability indices. The $i$th controllability index gives the dimension of the reachable space by only using the $i$th input that is not reachable by using previous inputs. Therefore, if the system is controllable, the sum of the controllability indices are $n$.
              – obareey
              Mar 16 '15 at 17:58










            • Right. Notice also that the initial ordering of the inputs may affect the list of indices.
              – Pait
              Mar 16 '15 at 19:35






            • 1




              Yes, it may affect the ordering of the indices but the values are invariant under the ordering of the inputs.
              – obareey
              Mar 16 '15 at 21:15










            • That is true. However they are not invariant under ordering of the columns of the controllability matrix, which itself is arbitrary. We're getting away from the original question but I do find this issue confusing, so it's useful to register that the concepts are indeed not completely transparent.
              – Pait
              Mar 17 '15 at 12:41


















            • I think this answers your question perfectly. I just want to add some intuition as I had too difficulties understanding controllability indices. The $i$th controllability index gives the dimension of the reachable space by only using the $i$th input that is not reachable by using previous inputs. Therefore, if the system is controllable, the sum of the controllability indices are $n$.
              – obareey
              Mar 16 '15 at 17:58










            • Right. Notice also that the initial ordering of the inputs may affect the list of indices.
              – Pait
              Mar 16 '15 at 19:35






            • 1




              Yes, it may affect the ordering of the indices but the values are invariant under the ordering of the inputs.
              – obareey
              Mar 16 '15 at 21:15










            • That is true. However they are not invariant under ordering of the columns of the controllability matrix, which itself is arbitrary. We're getting away from the original question but I do find this issue confusing, so it's useful to register that the concepts are indeed not completely transparent.
              – Pait
              Mar 17 '15 at 12:41
















            I think this answers your question perfectly. I just want to add some intuition as I had too difficulties understanding controllability indices. The $i$th controllability index gives the dimension of the reachable space by only using the $i$th input that is not reachable by using previous inputs. Therefore, if the system is controllable, the sum of the controllability indices are $n$.
            – obareey
            Mar 16 '15 at 17:58




            I think this answers your question perfectly. I just want to add some intuition as I had too difficulties understanding controllability indices. The $i$th controllability index gives the dimension of the reachable space by only using the $i$th input that is not reachable by using previous inputs. Therefore, if the system is controllable, the sum of the controllability indices are $n$.
            – obareey
            Mar 16 '15 at 17:58












            Right. Notice also that the initial ordering of the inputs may affect the list of indices.
            – Pait
            Mar 16 '15 at 19:35




            Right. Notice also that the initial ordering of the inputs may affect the list of indices.
            – Pait
            Mar 16 '15 at 19:35




            1




            1




            Yes, it may affect the ordering of the indices but the values are invariant under the ordering of the inputs.
            – obareey
            Mar 16 '15 at 21:15




            Yes, it may affect the ordering of the indices but the values are invariant under the ordering of the inputs.
            – obareey
            Mar 16 '15 at 21:15












            That is true. However they are not invariant under ordering of the columns of the controllability matrix, which itself is arbitrary. We're getting away from the original question but I do find this issue confusing, so it's useful to register that the concepts are indeed not completely transparent.
            – Pait
            Mar 17 '15 at 12:41




            That is true. However they are not invariant under ordering of the columns of the controllability matrix, which itself is arbitrary. We're getting away from the original question but I do find this issue confusing, so it's useful to register that the concepts are indeed not completely transparent.
            – Pait
            Mar 17 '15 at 12:41










            up vote
            0
            down vote













            I am studying the same subject now, from the same book and had exactly the same question you had.



            The answer by @Pait doesn't show that the resulting set $mathit{lambda_iAb_i}$ is a subset of the LHS vectors relative to $mathit{A^2b_1}$ in the controllability matrix. However I had understood it myself, and I will post it here for reference.



            Say $pmb{A^ib_m}$ is the first vector associated with $pmb{b_m}$ that is dependent on some of the vectors $pmb{v_k}$ at its left hand side (LHS).



            That is: $$pmb{A^ib_m}= sum_{k=1}^{i*m-1}alpha_kpmb{v_k} (1)$$
            Now, for the next vector associated with $pmb{b_m}$, i.e. $pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}$, we have: $$pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}= sum_{k=1}^{i*m-1}alpha_kpmb{Av_k} (2)$$
            Now we show (or clarify) that the set ${pmb{Av_k} | kinBbb{Z}, 1le k le (i*m-1)}$ is a subset of the vectors at LHS of $pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}$ in the controllability matrix.



            The sum in (1) can be split into:
            $$pmb{A^ib_m} = underbrace{sum_{k=0}^{i-1}alpha_{mk}^{'}pmb{A^kb_m}}_{Vectors which are\ associated with pmb{b_m}\ but are on LHS} + underbrace{(sum_{k=0}^ialpha_{1k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_1} +sum_{k=0}^ialpha_{2k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_2}+cdots+sum_{k=0}^ialpha_{(m-1)k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_{m-1}})}_{Vectors associated with pmb{b_j} columns\ which are before pmb{b_m} in the pmb{B} matrix}$$



            Now by multiplying by $pmb{A}$ on both sides:
            $$pmb{A^{i+1}b_m} = sum_{k=1}^{i}alpha_{mk}^{'}pmb{A^kb_m} + (sum_{k=1}^{i+1}alpha_{1k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_1} +sum_{k=1}^{i+1}alpha_{2k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_2}+cdots+sum_{k=1}^{i+1}alpha_{(m-1)k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_{m-1}})$$
            Clearly, the vectors in the summations are subset of the vectors that are at LHS of $pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}$ in the controllability matrix.






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              I am studying the same subject now, from the same book and had exactly the same question you had.



              The answer by @Pait doesn't show that the resulting set $mathit{lambda_iAb_i}$ is a subset of the LHS vectors relative to $mathit{A^2b_1}$ in the controllability matrix. However I had understood it myself, and I will post it here for reference.



              Say $pmb{A^ib_m}$ is the first vector associated with $pmb{b_m}$ that is dependent on some of the vectors $pmb{v_k}$ at its left hand side (LHS).



              That is: $$pmb{A^ib_m}= sum_{k=1}^{i*m-1}alpha_kpmb{v_k} (1)$$
              Now, for the next vector associated with $pmb{b_m}$, i.e. $pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}$, we have: $$pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}= sum_{k=1}^{i*m-1}alpha_kpmb{Av_k} (2)$$
              Now we show (or clarify) that the set ${pmb{Av_k} | kinBbb{Z}, 1le k le (i*m-1)}$ is a subset of the vectors at LHS of $pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}$ in the controllability matrix.



              The sum in (1) can be split into:
              $$pmb{A^ib_m} = underbrace{sum_{k=0}^{i-1}alpha_{mk}^{'}pmb{A^kb_m}}_{Vectors which are\ associated with pmb{b_m}\ but are on LHS} + underbrace{(sum_{k=0}^ialpha_{1k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_1} +sum_{k=0}^ialpha_{2k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_2}+cdots+sum_{k=0}^ialpha_{(m-1)k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_{m-1}})}_{Vectors associated with pmb{b_j} columns\ which are before pmb{b_m} in the pmb{B} matrix}$$



              Now by multiplying by $pmb{A}$ on both sides:
              $$pmb{A^{i+1}b_m} = sum_{k=1}^{i}alpha_{mk}^{'}pmb{A^kb_m} + (sum_{k=1}^{i+1}alpha_{1k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_1} +sum_{k=1}^{i+1}alpha_{2k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_2}+cdots+sum_{k=1}^{i+1}alpha_{(m-1)k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_{m-1}})$$
              Clearly, the vectors in the summations are subset of the vectors that are at LHS of $pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}$ in the controllability matrix.






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                I am studying the same subject now, from the same book and had exactly the same question you had.



                The answer by @Pait doesn't show that the resulting set $mathit{lambda_iAb_i}$ is a subset of the LHS vectors relative to $mathit{A^2b_1}$ in the controllability matrix. However I had understood it myself, and I will post it here for reference.



                Say $pmb{A^ib_m}$ is the first vector associated with $pmb{b_m}$ that is dependent on some of the vectors $pmb{v_k}$ at its left hand side (LHS).



                That is: $$pmb{A^ib_m}= sum_{k=1}^{i*m-1}alpha_kpmb{v_k} (1)$$
                Now, for the next vector associated with $pmb{b_m}$, i.e. $pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}$, we have: $$pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}= sum_{k=1}^{i*m-1}alpha_kpmb{Av_k} (2)$$
                Now we show (or clarify) that the set ${pmb{Av_k} | kinBbb{Z}, 1le k le (i*m-1)}$ is a subset of the vectors at LHS of $pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}$ in the controllability matrix.



                The sum in (1) can be split into:
                $$pmb{A^ib_m} = underbrace{sum_{k=0}^{i-1}alpha_{mk}^{'}pmb{A^kb_m}}_{Vectors which are\ associated with pmb{b_m}\ but are on LHS} + underbrace{(sum_{k=0}^ialpha_{1k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_1} +sum_{k=0}^ialpha_{2k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_2}+cdots+sum_{k=0}^ialpha_{(m-1)k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_{m-1}})}_{Vectors associated with pmb{b_j} columns\ which are before pmb{b_m} in the pmb{B} matrix}$$



                Now by multiplying by $pmb{A}$ on both sides:
                $$pmb{A^{i+1}b_m} = sum_{k=1}^{i}alpha_{mk}^{'}pmb{A^kb_m} + (sum_{k=1}^{i+1}alpha_{1k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_1} +sum_{k=1}^{i+1}alpha_{2k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_2}+cdots+sum_{k=1}^{i+1}alpha_{(m-1)k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_{m-1}})$$
                Clearly, the vectors in the summations are subset of the vectors that are at LHS of $pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}$ in the controllability matrix.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                I am studying the same subject now, from the same book and had exactly the same question you had.



                The answer by @Pait doesn't show that the resulting set $mathit{lambda_iAb_i}$ is a subset of the LHS vectors relative to $mathit{A^2b_1}$ in the controllability matrix. However I had understood it myself, and I will post it here for reference.



                Say $pmb{A^ib_m}$ is the first vector associated with $pmb{b_m}$ that is dependent on some of the vectors $pmb{v_k}$ at its left hand side (LHS).



                That is: $$pmb{A^ib_m}= sum_{k=1}^{i*m-1}alpha_kpmb{v_k} (1)$$
                Now, for the next vector associated with $pmb{b_m}$, i.e. $pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}$, we have: $$pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}= sum_{k=1}^{i*m-1}alpha_kpmb{Av_k} (2)$$
                Now we show (or clarify) that the set ${pmb{Av_k} | kinBbb{Z}, 1le k le (i*m-1)}$ is a subset of the vectors at LHS of $pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}$ in the controllability matrix.



                The sum in (1) can be split into:
                $$pmb{A^ib_m} = underbrace{sum_{k=0}^{i-1}alpha_{mk}^{'}pmb{A^kb_m}}_{Vectors which are\ associated with pmb{b_m}\ but are on LHS} + underbrace{(sum_{k=0}^ialpha_{1k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_1} +sum_{k=0}^ialpha_{2k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_2}+cdots+sum_{k=0}^ialpha_{(m-1)k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_{m-1}})}_{Vectors associated with pmb{b_j} columns\ which are before pmb{b_m} in the pmb{B} matrix}$$



                Now by multiplying by $pmb{A}$ on both sides:
                $$pmb{A^{i+1}b_m} = sum_{k=1}^{i}alpha_{mk}^{'}pmb{A^kb_m} + (sum_{k=1}^{i+1}alpha_{1k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_1} +sum_{k=1}^{i+1}alpha_{2k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_2}+cdots+sum_{k=1}^{i+1}alpha_{(m-1)k}^{'}pmb{A^kb_{m-1}})$$
                Clearly, the vectors in the summations are subset of the vectors that are at LHS of $pmb{A^{i+1}b_m}$ in the controllability matrix.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Nov 24 at 10:51

























                answered Nov 24 at 10:26









                Abdo

                11




                11






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1189957%2funderstanding-controllability-indices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bundesstraße 106

                    Verónica Boquete

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten