Closed Form of the Real Portion of the Product of Exponentials












3












$begingroup$


I am wondering if it is possible to express an equation in closed form. I currently have:



$f(n) = prod_{m=2}^{n-1} e^frac{pi i n}{m}$



Where $i$ is the $sqrt{-1}$, which I know it commonly represents but due to the finite product I figured I would add this note for clarity.



Context: I am trying to work towards a solution for Simplify Product of sines, yet so far I have only arrived here.



Some options I have been considering to try and find a closed form include cases such as I only actually care when $n$ is an odd number so discarding even cases is fine if that simplifies it. I am also fine with having the series start a $m=1$ instead of $m=2$ if that somehow simplifies the answer. The other potential saving grace is that I may only care about the real portion of the answer and not the imaginary portion if that simplifies things.



Sorry I am a computer scientist not a mathematician so please let me know if I should adjust the title or the wording of the question for clarity. Any leads or help of any form would be appreciated as I am currently lost.






exponential-function closed-form products







share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




cytinus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Please give more context. Providing context not only assures that this is not simply copied from a homework assignment, but also allows answers to be better directed at where the problem lies and to be within the proper scope. Please avoid "I have no clue" questions. Defining keywords and trying a simpler, similar problem often helps.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi, I guess the context is I was trying to work a little more on this, math.stackexchange.com/questions/1689831/…. I'm not in school and this is not homework, I am just a computer scientist who likes to dabble in some of my free time. I was trying to work towards a closed form of the equation linked and so I was breaking it into parts and this is where I got stuck. Its something I look at every few months so even a nudge in any direction would be helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – cytinus
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Hint: $prodlimits_{m=2}^{n-1}e^{a_m}=e^{sumlimits_{m=2}^{n-1}a_m}$
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It would be helpful to add that context to the question itself, rather than in a comment. I have undeleted my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    1 hour ago


















3












$begingroup$


I am wondering if it is possible to express an equation in closed form. I currently have:



$f(n) = prod_{m=2}^{n-1} e^frac{pi i n}{m}$



Where $i$ is the $sqrt{-1}$, which I know it commonly represents but due to the finite product I figured I would add this note for clarity.



Context: I am trying to work towards a solution for Simplify Product of sines, yet so far I have only arrived here.



Some options I have been considering to try and find a closed form include cases such as I only actually care when $n$ is an odd number so discarding even cases is fine if that simplifies it. I am also fine with having the series start a $m=1$ instead of $m=2$ if that somehow simplifies the answer. The other potential saving grace is that I may only care about the real portion of the answer and not the imaginary portion if that simplifies things.



Sorry I am a computer scientist not a mathematician so please let me know if I should adjust the title or the wording of the question for clarity. Any leads or help of any form would be appreciated as I am currently lost.






exponential-function closed-form products







share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




cytinus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Please give more context. Providing context not only assures that this is not simply copied from a homework assignment, but also allows answers to be better directed at where the problem lies and to be within the proper scope. Please avoid "I have no clue" questions. Defining keywords and trying a simpler, similar problem often helps.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi, I guess the context is I was trying to work a little more on this, math.stackexchange.com/questions/1689831/…. I'm not in school and this is not homework, I am just a computer scientist who likes to dabble in some of my free time. I was trying to work towards a closed form of the equation linked and so I was breaking it into parts and this is where I got stuck. Its something I look at every few months so even a nudge in any direction would be helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – cytinus
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Hint: $prodlimits_{m=2}^{n-1}e^{a_m}=e^{sumlimits_{m=2}^{n-1}a_m}$
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It would be helpful to add that context to the question itself, rather than in a comment. I have undeleted my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    1 hour ago
















3












3








3





$begingroup$


I am wondering if it is possible to express an equation in closed form. I currently have:



$f(n) = prod_{m=2}^{n-1} e^frac{pi i n}{m}$



Where $i$ is the $sqrt{-1}$, which I know it commonly represents but due to the finite product I figured I would add this note for clarity.



Context: I am trying to work towards a solution for Simplify Product of sines, yet so far I have only arrived here.



Some options I have been considering to try and find a closed form include cases such as I only actually care when $n$ is an odd number so discarding even cases is fine if that simplifies it. I am also fine with having the series start a $m=1$ instead of $m=2$ if that somehow simplifies the answer. The other potential saving grace is that I may only care about the real portion of the answer and not the imaginary portion if that simplifies things.



Sorry I am a computer scientist not a mathematician so please let me know if I should adjust the title or the wording of the question for clarity. Any leads or help of any form would be appreciated as I am currently lost.






exponential-function closed-form products







share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




cytinus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I am wondering if it is possible to express an equation in closed form. I currently have:



$f(n) = prod_{m=2}^{n-1} e^frac{pi i n}{m}$



Where $i$ is the $sqrt{-1}$, which I know it commonly represents but due to the finite product I figured I would add this note for clarity.



Context: I am trying to work towards a solution for Simplify Product of sines, yet so far I have only arrived here.



Some options I have been considering to try and find a closed form include cases such as I only actually care when $n$ is an odd number so discarding even cases is fine if that simplifies it. I am also fine with having the series start a $m=1$ instead of $m=2$ if that somehow simplifies the answer. The other potential saving grace is that I may only care about the real portion of the answer and not the imaginary portion if that simplifies things.



Sorry I am a computer scientist not a mathematician so please let me know if I should adjust the title or the wording of the question for clarity. Any leads or help of any form would be appreciated as I am currently lost.






exponential-function closed-form products




exponential-function closed-form products






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




cytinus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




cytinus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago







cytinus













New contributor




cytinus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









cytinuscytinus

1164




1164




New contributor




cytinus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





cytinus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






cytinus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    Please give more context. Providing context not only assures that this is not simply copied from a homework assignment, but also allows answers to be better directed at where the problem lies and to be within the proper scope. Please avoid "I have no clue" questions. Defining keywords and trying a simpler, similar problem often helps.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi, I guess the context is I was trying to work a little more on this, math.stackexchange.com/questions/1689831/…. I'm not in school and this is not homework, I am just a computer scientist who likes to dabble in some of my free time. I was trying to work towards a closed form of the equation linked and so I was breaking it into parts and this is where I got stuck. Its something I look at every few months so even a nudge in any direction would be helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – cytinus
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Hint: $prodlimits_{m=2}^{n-1}e^{a_m}=e^{sumlimits_{m=2}^{n-1}a_m}$
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It would be helpful to add that context to the question itself, rather than in a comment. I have undeleted my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    1 hour ago




















  • $begingroup$
    Please give more context. Providing context not only assures that this is not simply copied from a homework assignment, but also allows answers to be better directed at where the problem lies and to be within the proper scope. Please avoid "I have no clue" questions. Defining keywords and trying a simpler, similar problem often helps.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi, I guess the context is I was trying to work a little more on this, math.stackexchange.com/questions/1689831/…. I'm not in school and this is not homework, I am just a computer scientist who likes to dabble in some of my free time. I was trying to work towards a closed form of the equation linked and so I was breaking it into parts and this is where I got stuck. Its something I look at every few months so even a nudge in any direction would be helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – cytinus
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Hint: $prodlimits_{m=2}^{n-1}e^{a_m}=e^{sumlimits_{m=2}^{n-1}a_m}$
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It would be helpful to add that context to the question itself, rather than in a comment. I have undeleted my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn♦
    1 hour ago


















$begingroup$
Please give more context. Providing context not only assures that this is not simply copied from a homework assignment, but also allows answers to be better directed at where the problem lies and to be within the proper scope. Please avoid "I have no clue" questions. Defining keywords and trying a simpler, similar problem often helps.
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Please give more context. Providing context not only assures that this is not simply copied from a homework assignment, but also allows answers to be better directed at where the problem lies and to be within the proper scope. Please avoid "I have no clue" questions. Defining keywords and trying a simpler, similar problem often helps.
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Hi, I guess the context is I was trying to work a little more on this, math.stackexchange.com/questions/1689831/…. I'm not in school and this is not homework, I am just a computer scientist who likes to dabble in some of my free time. I was trying to work towards a closed form of the equation linked and so I was breaking it into parts and this is where I got stuck. Its something I look at every few months so even a nudge in any direction would be helpful.
$endgroup$
– cytinus
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Hi, I guess the context is I was trying to work a little more on this, math.stackexchange.com/questions/1689831/…. I'm not in school and this is not homework, I am just a computer scientist who likes to dabble in some of my free time. I was trying to work towards a closed form of the equation linked and so I was breaking it into parts and this is where I got stuck. Its something I look at every few months so even a nudge in any direction would be helpful.
$endgroup$
– cytinus
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
Hint: $prodlimits_{m=2}^{n-1}e^{a_m}=e^{sumlimits_{m=2}^{n-1}a_m}$
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Hint: $prodlimits_{m=2}^{n-1}e^{a_m}=e^{sumlimits_{m=2}^{n-1}a_m}$
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
It would be helpful to add that context to the question itself, rather than in a comment. I have undeleted my answer.
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
It would be helpful to add that context to the question itself, rather than in a comment. I have undeleted my answer.
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
1 hour ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

$$
begin{align}
prod_{m=2}^{n-1}e^{frac{pi in}m}
&=e^{pi in(H_{n-1}-1)}\
&=(-1)^ne^{pi inH_{n-1}}\[9pt]
&=(-1)^{n-1}e^{pi inH_n}tag1
end{align}
$$
where $H_n$ is the $n^text{th}$ Harmonic Number.
$$
H_nsimlog(n)+gamma+frac1{2n}-frac1{12n^2}+frac1{120n^4}-frac1{252n^6}+frac1{240n^8}-frac1{132n^{10}}tag2
$$
and $gamma$ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant.



The real portion of $(1)$ is
$$
operatorname{Re}left(prod_{m=2}^{n-1}e^{frac{pi in}m}right)=(-1)^{n-1}cosleft(pi nH_nright)tag3
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    3












    $begingroup$

    $$begin{align}
    f(n)=&prod_{m=2}^{n-1}expfrac{ipi n}{m}\
    &=expleft[sum_{m=2}^{n-1}frac{ipi n}{m}right]\
    &=expleft[ipi nsum_{m=2}^{n-1}frac{1}{m}right]\
    end{align}$$
    Recalling the definition of the harmonic numbers:
    $$H_n=sum_{m=1}^nfrac1m$$
    We have that
    $$f(n)=expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]$$
    Then using $e^{itheta}=costheta+isintheta$,
    $$f(n)=cosleft[pi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]+isinleft[pi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]$$
    So
    $$text{Re}f(n)=cosleft[pi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Why is $expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]=exp(ipi n)exp(H_{n-1}-1)$?
      $endgroup$
      – greelious
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @greelious because I messed up... Thanks! :)
      $endgroup$
      – clathratus
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      I think it is still not correct: $expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]=exp(i pi n H_{n-1})exp(-i pi n)=exp(i pi n H_{n-1})(-1)^n$
      $endgroup$
      – greelious
      1 hour ago












    • $begingroup$
      @greelious okay look now
      $endgroup$
      – clathratus
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      Looks good now.
      $endgroup$
      – greelious
      56 mins ago











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    cytinus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3076538%2fclosed-form-of-the-real-portion-of-the-product-of-exponentials%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    $$
    begin{align}
    prod_{m=2}^{n-1}e^{frac{pi in}m}
    &=e^{pi in(H_{n-1}-1)}\
    &=(-1)^ne^{pi inH_{n-1}}\[9pt]
    &=(-1)^{n-1}e^{pi inH_n}tag1
    end{align}
    $$
    where $H_n$ is the $n^text{th}$ Harmonic Number.
    $$
    H_nsimlog(n)+gamma+frac1{2n}-frac1{12n^2}+frac1{120n^4}-frac1{252n^6}+frac1{240n^8}-frac1{132n^{10}}tag2
    $$
    and $gamma$ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant.



    The real portion of $(1)$ is
    $$
    operatorname{Re}left(prod_{m=2}^{n-1}e^{frac{pi in}m}right)=(-1)^{n-1}cosleft(pi nH_nright)tag3
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      $$
      begin{align}
      prod_{m=2}^{n-1}e^{frac{pi in}m}
      &=e^{pi in(H_{n-1}-1)}\
      &=(-1)^ne^{pi inH_{n-1}}\[9pt]
      &=(-1)^{n-1}e^{pi inH_n}tag1
      end{align}
      $$
      where $H_n$ is the $n^text{th}$ Harmonic Number.
      $$
      H_nsimlog(n)+gamma+frac1{2n}-frac1{12n^2}+frac1{120n^4}-frac1{252n^6}+frac1{240n^8}-frac1{132n^{10}}tag2
      $$
      and $gamma$ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant.



      The real portion of $(1)$ is
      $$
      operatorname{Re}left(prod_{m=2}^{n-1}e^{frac{pi in}m}right)=(-1)^{n-1}cosleft(pi nH_nright)tag3
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        $$
        begin{align}
        prod_{m=2}^{n-1}e^{frac{pi in}m}
        &=e^{pi in(H_{n-1}-1)}\
        &=(-1)^ne^{pi inH_{n-1}}\[9pt]
        &=(-1)^{n-1}e^{pi inH_n}tag1
        end{align}
        $$
        where $H_n$ is the $n^text{th}$ Harmonic Number.
        $$
        H_nsimlog(n)+gamma+frac1{2n}-frac1{12n^2}+frac1{120n^4}-frac1{252n^6}+frac1{240n^8}-frac1{132n^{10}}tag2
        $$
        and $gamma$ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant.



        The real portion of $(1)$ is
        $$
        operatorname{Re}left(prod_{m=2}^{n-1}e^{frac{pi in}m}right)=(-1)^{n-1}cosleft(pi nH_nright)tag3
        $$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        $$
        begin{align}
        prod_{m=2}^{n-1}e^{frac{pi in}m}
        &=e^{pi in(H_{n-1}-1)}\
        &=(-1)^ne^{pi inH_{n-1}}\[9pt]
        &=(-1)^{n-1}e^{pi inH_n}tag1
        end{align}
        $$
        where $H_n$ is the $n^text{th}$ Harmonic Number.
        $$
        H_nsimlog(n)+gamma+frac1{2n}-frac1{12n^2}+frac1{120n^4}-frac1{252n^6}+frac1{240n^8}-frac1{132n^{10}}tag2
        $$
        and $gamma$ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant.



        The real portion of $(1)$ is
        $$
        operatorname{Re}left(prod_{m=2}^{n-1}e^{frac{pi in}m}right)=(-1)^{n-1}cosleft(pi nH_nright)tag3
        $$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 1 hour ago

























        answered 1 hour ago









        robjohn♦robjohn

        265k27304626




        265k27304626























            3












            $begingroup$

            $$begin{align}
            f(n)=&prod_{m=2}^{n-1}expfrac{ipi n}{m}\
            &=expleft[sum_{m=2}^{n-1}frac{ipi n}{m}right]\
            &=expleft[ipi nsum_{m=2}^{n-1}frac{1}{m}right]\
            end{align}$$
            Recalling the definition of the harmonic numbers:
            $$H_n=sum_{m=1}^nfrac1m$$
            We have that
            $$f(n)=expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]$$
            Then using $e^{itheta}=costheta+isintheta$,
            $$f(n)=cosleft[pi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]+isinleft[pi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]$$
            So
            $$text{Re}f(n)=cosleft[pi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Why is $expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]=exp(ipi n)exp(H_{n-1}-1)$?
              $endgroup$
              – greelious
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @greelious because I messed up... Thanks! :)
              $endgroup$
              – clathratus
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              I think it is still not correct: $expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]=exp(i pi n H_{n-1})exp(-i pi n)=exp(i pi n H_{n-1})(-1)^n$
              $endgroup$
              – greelious
              1 hour ago












            • $begingroup$
              @greelious okay look now
              $endgroup$
              – clathratus
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Looks good now.
              $endgroup$
              – greelious
              56 mins ago
















            3












            $begingroup$

            $$begin{align}
            f(n)=&prod_{m=2}^{n-1}expfrac{ipi n}{m}\
            &=expleft[sum_{m=2}^{n-1}frac{ipi n}{m}right]\
            &=expleft[ipi nsum_{m=2}^{n-1}frac{1}{m}right]\
            end{align}$$
            Recalling the definition of the harmonic numbers:
            $$H_n=sum_{m=1}^nfrac1m$$
            We have that
            $$f(n)=expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]$$
            Then using $e^{itheta}=costheta+isintheta$,
            $$f(n)=cosleft[pi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]+isinleft[pi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]$$
            So
            $$text{Re}f(n)=cosleft[pi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Why is $expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]=exp(ipi n)exp(H_{n-1}-1)$?
              $endgroup$
              – greelious
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @greelious because I messed up... Thanks! :)
              $endgroup$
              – clathratus
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              I think it is still not correct: $expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]=exp(i pi n H_{n-1})exp(-i pi n)=exp(i pi n H_{n-1})(-1)^n$
              $endgroup$
              – greelious
              1 hour ago












            • $begingroup$
              @greelious okay look now
              $endgroup$
              – clathratus
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Looks good now.
              $endgroup$
              – greelious
              56 mins ago














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            $$begin{align}
            f(n)=&prod_{m=2}^{n-1}expfrac{ipi n}{m}\
            &=expleft[sum_{m=2}^{n-1}frac{ipi n}{m}right]\
            &=expleft[ipi nsum_{m=2}^{n-1}frac{1}{m}right]\
            end{align}$$
            Recalling the definition of the harmonic numbers:
            $$H_n=sum_{m=1}^nfrac1m$$
            We have that
            $$f(n)=expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]$$
            Then using $e^{itheta}=costheta+isintheta$,
            $$f(n)=cosleft[pi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]+isinleft[pi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]$$
            So
            $$text{Re}f(n)=cosleft[pi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            $$begin{align}
            f(n)=&prod_{m=2}^{n-1}expfrac{ipi n}{m}\
            &=expleft[sum_{m=2}^{n-1}frac{ipi n}{m}right]\
            &=expleft[ipi nsum_{m=2}^{n-1}frac{1}{m}right]\
            end{align}$$
            Recalling the definition of the harmonic numbers:
            $$H_n=sum_{m=1}^nfrac1m$$
            We have that
            $$f(n)=expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]$$
            Then using $e^{itheta}=costheta+isintheta$,
            $$f(n)=cosleft[pi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]+isinleft[pi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]$$
            So
            $$text{Re}f(n)=cosleft[pi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]$$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 1 hour ago

























            answered 1 hour ago









            clathratusclathratus

            3,606332




            3,606332








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Why is $expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]=exp(ipi n)exp(H_{n-1}-1)$?
              $endgroup$
              – greelious
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @greelious because I messed up... Thanks! :)
              $endgroup$
              – clathratus
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              I think it is still not correct: $expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]=exp(i pi n H_{n-1})exp(-i pi n)=exp(i pi n H_{n-1})(-1)^n$
              $endgroup$
              – greelious
              1 hour ago












            • $begingroup$
              @greelious okay look now
              $endgroup$
              – clathratus
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Looks good now.
              $endgroup$
              – greelious
              56 mins ago














            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Why is $expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]=exp(ipi n)exp(H_{n-1}-1)$?
              $endgroup$
              – greelious
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @greelious because I messed up... Thanks! :)
              $endgroup$
              – clathratus
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              I think it is still not correct: $expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]=exp(i pi n H_{n-1})exp(-i pi n)=exp(i pi n H_{n-1})(-1)^n$
              $endgroup$
              – greelious
              1 hour ago












            • $begingroup$
              @greelious okay look now
              $endgroup$
              – clathratus
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Looks good now.
              $endgroup$
              – greelious
              56 mins ago








            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Why is $expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]=exp(ipi n)exp(H_{n-1}-1)$?
            $endgroup$
            – greelious
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            Why is $expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]=exp(ipi n)exp(H_{n-1}-1)$?
            $endgroup$
            – greelious
            1 hour ago












            $begingroup$
            @greelious because I messed up... Thanks! :)
            $endgroup$
            – clathratus
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            @greelious because I messed up... Thanks! :)
            $endgroup$
            – clathratus
            1 hour ago












            $begingroup$
            I think it is still not correct: $expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]=exp(i pi n H_{n-1})exp(-i pi n)=exp(i pi n H_{n-1})(-1)^n$
            $endgroup$
            – greelious
            1 hour ago






            $begingroup$
            I think it is still not correct: $expleft[ipi n(H_{n-1}-1)right]=exp(i pi n H_{n-1})exp(-i pi n)=exp(i pi n H_{n-1})(-1)^n$
            $endgroup$
            – greelious
            1 hour ago














            $begingroup$
            @greelious okay look now
            $endgroup$
            – clathratus
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            @greelious okay look now
            $endgroup$
            – clathratus
            1 hour ago












            $begingroup$
            Looks good now.
            $endgroup$
            – greelious
            56 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Looks good now.
            $endgroup$
            – greelious
            56 mins ago










            cytinus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            cytinus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            cytinus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            cytinus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3076538%2fclosed-form-of-the-real-portion-of-the-product-of-exponentials%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Image
            Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
            Read more

            Verónica Boquete

            Image
            Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
            Read more

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

            Image
            Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
            Read more