Find subsequences with specific properties












0












$begingroup$


Let $(a_n)$ be a bounded sequence such that $inf_{ell} a_{ell}<a_n< sup_{ell} a_{ell}$ for each $n=1,2, dots$



I want to show that there are subsequences $(a_{k_n})$ increasing and $(a_{m_n})$ decreasing such that $a_{k_n} to sup_{ell} a_{ell}$ and $a_{m_n} to inf_{ell} a_{ell}$.



Could you give me a hint how we could find the desired subsequences?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $(a_n)$ be a bounded sequence such that $inf_{ell} a_{ell}<a_n< sup_{ell} a_{ell}$ for each $n=1,2, dots$



    I want to show that there are subsequences $(a_{k_n})$ increasing and $(a_{m_n})$ decreasing such that $a_{k_n} to sup_{ell} a_{ell}$ and $a_{m_n} to inf_{ell} a_{ell}$.



    Could you give me a hint how we could find the desired subsequences?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let $(a_n)$ be a bounded sequence such that $inf_{ell} a_{ell}<a_n< sup_{ell} a_{ell}$ for each $n=1,2, dots$



      I want to show that there are subsequences $(a_{k_n})$ increasing and $(a_{m_n})$ decreasing such that $a_{k_n} to sup_{ell} a_{ell}$ and $a_{m_n} to inf_{ell} a_{ell}$.



      Could you give me a hint how we could find the desired subsequences?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $(a_n)$ be a bounded sequence such that $inf_{ell} a_{ell}<a_n< sup_{ell} a_{ell}$ for each $n=1,2, dots$



      I want to show that there are subsequences $(a_{k_n})$ increasing and $(a_{m_n})$ decreasing such that $a_{k_n} to sup_{ell} a_{ell}$ and $a_{m_n} to inf_{ell} a_{ell}$.



      Could you give me a hint how we could find the desired subsequences?







      sequences-and-series analysis supremum-and-infimum






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 1 '18 at 20:58









      EvindaEvinda

      692513




      692513






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Hint



          Suppose the infimum is $0$ and the supremum is $1$. Choose $a_{k_1}=a_1$ as the fist member of the decreasing sequence. Then since $a_1>0$ by hypothesis, there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2>k_1$ and $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$ and a $k_3>k_2$ and $0<a_{k_3}<a_{k_2}/2$ and so on. (Make sure you see why we can choose $k_{m+1}>k_m.$)



          EDIT



          In response to the OP's comment.
          First of all, since $0 = inf{a_n}$ there are $a_k$ arbitrarily close to $0$ so we can certainly find $k_2$ such that $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$. The only question is whether we can find such a $k_2>k_1$. Suppose not. Then $K={k|a_k<a_{k_1}}$ is finite, and then $inf{a_k}=min_{kin K}a_k>0,$ contradiction.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I haven't understood why there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2> k_1$ and $0< a_{k_2}< frac{a_{k_1}}{2}$ and so on. Could you explain it further to me?
            $endgroup$
            – Evinda
            Dec 2 '18 at 9:26










          • $begingroup$
            @Evinda I added some details.
            $endgroup$
            – saulspatz
            Dec 2 '18 at 13:26











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021823%2ffind-subsequences-with-specific-properties%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          Hint



          Suppose the infimum is $0$ and the supremum is $1$. Choose $a_{k_1}=a_1$ as the fist member of the decreasing sequence. Then since $a_1>0$ by hypothesis, there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2>k_1$ and $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$ and a $k_3>k_2$ and $0<a_{k_3}<a_{k_2}/2$ and so on. (Make sure you see why we can choose $k_{m+1}>k_m.$)



          EDIT



          In response to the OP's comment.
          First of all, since $0 = inf{a_n}$ there are $a_k$ arbitrarily close to $0$ so we can certainly find $k_2$ such that $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$. The only question is whether we can find such a $k_2>k_1$. Suppose not. Then $K={k|a_k<a_{k_1}}$ is finite, and then $inf{a_k}=min_{kin K}a_k>0,$ contradiction.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I haven't understood why there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2> k_1$ and $0< a_{k_2}< frac{a_{k_1}}{2}$ and so on. Could you explain it further to me?
            $endgroup$
            – Evinda
            Dec 2 '18 at 9:26










          • $begingroup$
            @Evinda I added some details.
            $endgroup$
            – saulspatz
            Dec 2 '18 at 13:26
















          0












          $begingroup$

          Hint



          Suppose the infimum is $0$ and the supremum is $1$. Choose $a_{k_1}=a_1$ as the fist member of the decreasing sequence. Then since $a_1>0$ by hypothesis, there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2>k_1$ and $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$ and a $k_3>k_2$ and $0<a_{k_3}<a_{k_2}/2$ and so on. (Make sure you see why we can choose $k_{m+1}>k_m.$)



          EDIT



          In response to the OP's comment.
          First of all, since $0 = inf{a_n}$ there are $a_k$ arbitrarily close to $0$ so we can certainly find $k_2$ such that $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$. The only question is whether we can find such a $k_2>k_1$. Suppose not. Then $K={k|a_k<a_{k_1}}$ is finite, and then $inf{a_k}=min_{kin K}a_k>0,$ contradiction.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I haven't understood why there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2> k_1$ and $0< a_{k_2}< frac{a_{k_1}}{2}$ and so on. Could you explain it further to me?
            $endgroup$
            – Evinda
            Dec 2 '18 at 9:26










          • $begingroup$
            @Evinda I added some details.
            $endgroup$
            – saulspatz
            Dec 2 '18 at 13:26














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          Hint



          Suppose the infimum is $0$ and the supremum is $1$. Choose $a_{k_1}=a_1$ as the fist member of the decreasing sequence. Then since $a_1>0$ by hypothesis, there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2>k_1$ and $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$ and a $k_3>k_2$ and $0<a_{k_3}<a_{k_2}/2$ and so on. (Make sure you see why we can choose $k_{m+1}>k_m.$)



          EDIT



          In response to the OP's comment.
          First of all, since $0 = inf{a_n}$ there are $a_k$ arbitrarily close to $0$ so we can certainly find $k_2$ such that $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$. The only question is whether we can find such a $k_2>k_1$. Suppose not. Then $K={k|a_k<a_{k_1}}$ is finite, and then $inf{a_k}=min_{kin K}a_k>0,$ contradiction.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Hint



          Suppose the infimum is $0$ and the supremum is $1$. Choose $a_{k_1}=a_1$ as the fist member of the decreasing sequence. Then since $a_1>0$ by hypothesis, there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2>k_1$ and $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$ and a $k_3>k_2$ and $0<a_{k_3}<a_{k_2}/2$ and so on. (Make sure you see why we can choose $k_{m+1}>k_m.$)



          EDIT



          In response to the OP's comment.
          First of all, since $0 = inf{a_n}$ there are $a_k$ arbitrarily close to $0$ so we can certainly find $k_2$ such that $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$. The only question is whether we can find such a $k_2>k_1$. Suppose not. Then $K={k|a_k<a_{k_1}}$ is finite, and then $inf{a_k}=min_{kin K}a_k>0,$ contradiction.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 2 '18 at 13:26

























          answered Dec 1 '18 at 21:16









          saulspatzsaulspatz

          14.2k21329




          14.2k21329












          • $begingroup$
            I haven't understood why there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2> k_1$ and $0< a_{k_2}< frac{a_{k_1}}{2}$ and so on. Could you explain it further to me?
            $endgroup$
            – Evinda
            Dec 2 '18 at 9:26










          • $begingroup$
            @Evinda I added some details.
            $endgroup$
            – saulspatz
            Dec 2 '18 at 13:26


















          • $begingroup$
            I haven't understood why there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2> k_1$ and $0< a_{k_2}< frac{a_{k_1}}{2}$ and so on. Could you explain it further to me?
            $endgroup$
            – Evinda
            Dec 2 '18 at 9:26










          • $begingroup$
            @Evinda I added some details.
            $endgroup$
            – saulspatz
            Dec 2 '18 at 13:26
















          $begingroup$
          I haven't understood why there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2> k_1$ and $0< a_{k_2}< frac{a_{k_1}}{2}$ and so on. Could you explain it further to me?
          $endgroup$
          – Evinda
          Dec 2 '18 at 9:26




          $begingroup$
          I haven't understood why there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2> k_1$ and $0< a_{k_2}< frac{a_{k_1}}{2}$ and so on. Could you explain it further to me?
          $endgroup$
          – Evinda
          Dec 2 '18 at 9:26












          $begingroup$
          @Evinda I added some details.
          $endgroup$
          – saulspatz
          Dec 2 '18 at 13:26




          $begingroup$
          @Evinda I added some details.
          $endgroup$
          – saulspatz
          Dec 2 '18 at 13:26


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021823%2ffind-subsequences-with-specific-properties%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Le Mesnil-Réaume

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

          web3.py web3.isConnected() returns false always