Correlation and Covariance on Standardized X
I am stuck on the following problem:
Let $Z_X$ be the standardized $X$, $Z_X=(X-mu_X)/sigma_X$, and let $Z_Y$ be the standardized $Y$, $Z_Y=(Y-mu_Y)/sigma_Y$. Show that $Corr(X,Y)=Cov(Z_X,Z_Y)=E(Z_XZ_Y)$.
I have tried just plugging in the definition into what we are trying to prove but I don't know how $ Corr(X,Y)=Cov(frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X},frac{Y-mu_Y}{sigma_Y})=E(frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X},frac{Y-mu_Y}{sigma_Y}) $ helps. I think I have to use the facts that $Cov(aX+b,cY+d)=acCov(X,Y)$ and $Corr(aX+b,cY+d)=Corr(X,Y)$ when $ a $ and $ c $ the same sign, but I am not sure where exactly. Any suggestions?
statistics random-variables covariance correlation expected-value
|
show 1 more comment
I am stuck on the following problem:
Let $Z_X$ be the standardized $X$, $Z_X=(X-mu_X)/sigma_X$, and let $Z_Y$ be the standardized $Y$, $Z_Y=(Y-mu_Y)/sigma_Y$. Show that $Corr(X,Y)=Cov(Z_X,Z_Y)=E(Z_XZ_Y)$.
I have tried just plugging in the definition into what we are trying to prove but I don't know how $ Corr(X,Y)=Cov(frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X},frac{Y-mu_Y}{sigma_Y})=E(frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X},frac{Y-mu_Y}{sigma_Y}) $ helps. I think I have to use the facts that $Cov(aX+b,cY+d)=acCov(X,Y)$ and $Corr(aX+b,cY+d)=Corr(X,Y)$ when $ a $ and $ c $ the same sign, but I am not sure where exactly. Any suggestions?
statistics random-variables covariance correlation expected-value
It's not totally clear to me what you are trying to prove. Is there a problem statement missing, before your sentence "I have tried..." ?
– kimchi lover
Nov 29 '18 at 3:15
Sorry, that was a typo. Fixed.
– D. Wei
Nov 29 '18 at 3:16
Is $Z_Y = (Y-mu_Y)/sigma_Y$ not the same as your definition of "let $Z_Y$ be the standardized $Y$"?
– angryavian
Nov 29 '18 at 3:16
Yes it is. The place where I pulled it from only briefly touched on standardization so the author probably felt the need to define it again here.
– D. Wei
Nov 29 '18 at 3:18
I assume the real problem has to do with correlations? Maybe that the correlation of $X$ and $Y$ is the same as that of $Z_X$ and $Z_Y$?
– kimchi lover
Nov 29 '18 at 3:19
|
show 1 more comment
I am stuck on the following problem:
Let $Z_X$ be the standardized $X$, $Z_X=(X-mu_X)/sigma_X$, and let $Z_Y$ be the standardized $Y$, $Z_Y=(Y-mu_Y)/sigma_Y$. Show that $Corr(X,Y)=Cov(Z_X,Z_Y)=E(Z_XZ_Y)$.
I have tried just plugging in the definition into what we are trying to prove but I don't know how $ Corr(X,Y)=Cov(frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X},frac{Y-mu_Y}{sigma_Y})=E(frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X},frac{Y-mu_Y}{sigma_Y}) $ helps. I think I have to use the facts that $Cov(aX+b,cY+d)=acCov(X,Y)$ and $Corr(aX+b,cY+d)=Corr(X,Y)$ when $ a $ and $ c $ the same sign, but I am not sure where exactly. Any suggestions?
statistics random-variables covariance correlation expected-value
I am stuck on the following problem:
Let $Z_X$ be the standardized $X$, $Z_X=(X-mu_X)/sigma_X$, and let $Z_Y$ be the standardized $Y$, $Z_Y=(Y-mu_Y)/sigma_Y$. Show that $Corr(X,Y)=Cov(Z_X,Z_Y)=E(Z_XZ_Y)$.
I have tried just plugging in the definition into what we are trying to prove but I don't know how $ Corr(X,Y)=Cov(frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X},frac{Y-mu_Y}{sigma_Y})=E(frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X},frac{Y-mu_Y}{sigma_Y}) $ helps. I think I have to use the facts that $Cov(aX+b,cY+d)=acCov(X,Y)$ and $Corr(aX+b,cY+d)=Corr(X,Y)$ when $ a $ and $ c $ the same sign, but I am not sure where exactly. Any suggestions?
statistics random-variables covariance correlation expected-value
statistics random-variables covariance correlation expected-value
edited Nov 29 '18 at 3:21
asked Nov 29 '18 at 3:10
D. Wei
425
425
It's not totally clear to me what you are trying to prove. Is there a problem statement missing, before your sentence "I have tried..." ?
– kimchi lover
Nov 29 '18 at 3:15
Sorry, that was a typo. Fixed.
– D. Wei
Nov 29 '18 at 3:16
Is $Z_Y = (Y-mu_Y)/sigma_Y$ not the same as your definition of "let $Z_Y$ be the standardized $Y$"?
– angryavian
Nov 29 '18 at 3:16
Yes it is. The place where I pulled it from only briefly touched on standardization so the author probably felt the need to define it again here.
– D. Wei
Nov 29 '18 at 3:18
I assume the real problem has to do with correlations? Maybe that the correlation of $X$ and $Y$ is the same as that of $Z_X$ and $Z_Y$?
– kimchi lover
Nov 29 '18 at 3:19
|
show 1 more comment
It's not totally clear to me what you are trying to prove. Is there a problem statement missing, before your sentence "I have tried..." ?
– kimchi lover
Nov 29 '18 at 3:15
Sorry, that was a typo. Fixed.
– D. Wei
Nov 29 '18 at 3:16
Is $Z_Y = (Y-mu_Y)/sigma_Y$ not the same as your definition of "let $Z_Y$ be the standardized $Y$"?
– angryavian
Nov 29 '18 at 3:16
Yes it is. The place where I pulled it from only briefly touched on standardization so the author probably felt the need to define it again here.
– D. Wei
Nov 29 '18 at 3:18
I assume the real problem has to do with correlations? Maybe that the correlation of $X$ and $Y$ is the same as that of $Z_X$ and $Z_Y$?
– kimchi lover
Nov 29 '18 at 3:19
It's not totally clear to me what you are trying to prove. Is there a problem statement missing, before your sentence "I have tried..." ?
– kimchi lover
Nov 29 '18 at 3:15
It's not totally clear to me what you are trying to prove. Is there a problem statement missing, before your sentence "I have tried..." ?
– kimchi lover
Nov 29 '18 at 3:15
Sorry, that was a typo. Fixed.
– D. Wei
Nov 29 '18 at 3:16
Sorry, that was a typo. Fixed.
– D. Wei
Nov 29 '18 at 3:16
Is $Z_Y = (Y-mu_Y)/sigma_Y$ not the same as your definition of "let $Z_Y$ be the standardized $Y$"?
– angryavian
Nov 29 '18 at 3:16
Is $Z_Y = (Y-mu_Y)/sigma_Y$ not the same as your definition of "let $Z_Y$ be the standardized $Y$"?
– angryavian
Nov 29 '18 at 3:16
Yes it is. The place where I pulled it from only briefly touched on standardization so the author probably felt the need to define it again here.
– D. Wei
Nov 29 '18 at 3:18
Yes it is. The place where I pulled it from only briefly touched on standardization so the author probably felt the need to define it again here.
– D. Wei
Nov 29 '18 at 3:18
I assume the real problem has to do with correlations? Maybe that the correlation of $X$ and $Y$ is the same as that of $Z_X$ and $Z_Y$?
– kimchi lover
Nov 29 '18 at 3:19
I assume the real problem has to do with correlations? Maybe that the correlation of $X$ and $Y$ is the same as that of $Z_X$ and $Z_Y$?
– kimchi lover
Nov 29 '18 at 3:19
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
From the formula for covariance, we have
$$operatorname{Cov}(Z_X, Z_Y) = E[Z_X Z_Y] - E[Z_X] E[Z_Y].$$
Note that $E[Z_X]=0$ and $E[Z_Y] = 0$ (why?), so
$$operatorname{Cov}(Z_X, Z_Y) = E[Z_X Z_Y ].$$
Using the facts mentioned at the end of your question, we have
$$operatorname{Cov}(Z_X, Z_Y) = operatorname{Cov}(frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X}, frac{Y-mu_Y}{sigma_Y}) = frac{operatorname{Cov}(X,Y)}{sigma_X sigma_Y} = operatorname{Corr}(X,Y).$$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018103%2fcorrelation-and-covariance-on-standardized-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
From the formula for covariance, we have
$$operatorname{Cov}(Z_X, Z_Y) = E[Z_X Z_Y] - E[Z_X] E[Z_Y].$$
Note that $E[Z_X]=0$ and $E[Z_Y] = 0$ (why?), so
$$operatorname{Cov}(Z_X, Z_Y) = E[Z_X Z_Y ].$$
Using the facts mentioned at the end of your question, we have
$$operatorname{Cov}(Z_X, Z_Y) = operatorname{Cov}(frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X}, frac{Y-mu_Y}{sigma_Y}) = frac{operatorname{Cov}(X,Y)}{sigma_X sigma_Y} = operatorname{Corr}(X,Y).$$
add a comment |
From the formula for covariance, we have
$$operatorname{Cov}(Z_X, Z_Y) = E[Z_X Z_Y] - E[Z_X] E[Z_Y].$$
Note that $E[Z_X]=0$ and $E[Z_Y] = 0$ (why?), so
$$operatorname{Cov}(Z_X, Z_Y) = E[Z_X Z_Y ].$$
Using the facts mentioned at the end of your question, we have
$$operatorname{Cov}(Z_X, Z_Y) = operatorname{Cov}(frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X}, frac{Y-mu_Y}{sigma_Y}) = frac{operatorname{Cov}(X,Y)}{sigma_X sigma_Y} = operatorname{Corr}(X,Y).$$
add a comment |
From the formula for covariance, we have
$$operatorname{Cov}(Z_X, Z_Y) = E[Z_X Z_Y] - E[Z_X] E[Z_Y].$$
Note that $E[Z_X]=0$ and $E[Z_Y] = 0$ (why?), so
$$operatorname{Cov}(Z_X, Z_Y) = E[Z_X Z_Y ].$$
Using the facts mentioned at the end of your question, we have
$$operatorname{Cov}(Z_X, Z_Y) = operatorname{Cov}(frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X}, frac{Y-mu_Y}{sigma_Y}) = frac{operatorname{Cov}(X,Y)}{sigma_X sigma_Y} = operatorname{Corr}(X,Y).$$
From the formula for covariance, we have
$$operatorname{Cov}(Z_X, Z_Y) = E[Z_X Z_Y] - E[Z_X] E[Z_Y].$$
Note that $E[Z_X]=0$ and $E[Z_Y] = 0$ (why?), so
$$operatorname{Cov}(Z_X, Z_Y) = E[Z_X Z_Y ].$$
Using the facts mentioned at the end of your question, we have
$$operatorname{Cov}(Z_X, Z_Y) = operatorname{Cov}(frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X}, frac{Y-mu_Y}{sigma_Y}) = frac{operatorname{Cov}(X,Y)}{sigma_X sigma_Y} = operatorname{Corr}(X,Y).$$
answered Nov 29 '18 at 3:44
angryavian
39.2k23280
39.2k23280
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018103%2fcorrelation-and-covariance-on-standardized-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It's not totally clear to me what you are trying to prove. Is there a problem statement missing, before your sentence "I have tried..." ?
– kimchi lover
Nov 29 '18 at 3:15
Sorry, that was a typo. Fixed.
– D. Wei
Nov 29 '18 at 3:16
Is $Z_Y = (Y-mu_Y)/sigma_Y$ not the same as your definition of "let $Z_Y$ be the standardized $Y$"?
– angryavian
Nov 29 '18 at 3:16
Yes it is. The place where I pulled it from only briefly touched on standardization so the author probably felt the need to define it again here.
– D. Wei
Nov 29 '18 at 3:18
I assume the real problem has to do with correlations? Maybe that the correlation of $X$ and $Y$ is the same as that of $Z_X$ and $Z_Y$?
– kimchi lover
Nov 29 '18 at 3:19