Find the highest and lowest possible value of function $f(x)={3x^2+6x+6over x^2+4x+5}$












3












$begingroup$



Find the highest and lowest value of the next function without the use of derivatives
$$f(x)={3x^2+6x+6over x^2+4x+5}$$




Okay so my teacher gave me this problem, and told me to strictly solve it without using derivatives. Obviously with using derivatives it's pretty easy, just find where $f'(x_0)=0$, and check it's second derivative in $x_0$ to see if it's a maximum or minimum.



So I was thinking about this:



Since this function is written as a fraction, the lowest possible value should be when the numerator value is the lowest, while the denominator is the highest possible value.



BUT, again to find the highest and lowest value of both I could use derivatives again, which again isn't the point.



I can see that both the numerator and denominator of this fraction is always positive for every $x$, so maybe there's a hint that I can't see there?



Maybe I could use limits too, but I'm not sure how.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$



    Find the highest and lowest value of the next function without the use of derivatives
    $$f(x)={3x^2+6x+6over x^2+4x+5}$$




    Okay so my teacher gave me this problem, and told me to strictly solve it without using derivatives. Obviously with using derivatives it's pretty easy, just find where $f'(x_0)=0$, and check it's second derivative in $x_0$ to see if it's a maximum or minimum.



    So I was thinking about this:



    Since this function is written as a fraction, the lowest possible value should be when the numerator value is the lowest, while the denominator is the highest possible value.



    BUT, again to find the highest and lowest value of both I could use derivatives again, which again isn't the point.



    I can see that both the numerator and denominator of this fraction is always positive for every $x$, so maybe there's a hint that I can't see there?



    Maybe I could use limits too, but I'm not sure how.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      3



      $begingroup$



      Find the highest and lowest value of the next function without the use of derivatives
      $$f(x)={3x^2+6x+6over x^2+4x+5}$$




      Okay so my teacher gave me this problem, and told me to strictly solve it without using derivatives. Obviously with using derivatives it's pretty easy, just find where $f'(x_0)=0$, and check it's second derivative in $x_0$ to see if it's a maximum or minimum.



      So I was thinking about this:



      Since this function is written as a fraction, the lowest possible value should be when the numerator value is the lowest, while the denominator is the highest possible value.



      BUT, again to find the highest and lowest value of both I could use derivatives again, which again isn't the point.



      I can see that both the numerator and denominator of this fraction is always positive for every $x$, so maybe there's a hint that I can't see there?



      Maybe I could use limits too, but I'm not sure how.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$





      Find the highest and lowest value of the next function without the use of derivatives
      $$f(x)={3x^2+6x+6over x^2+4x+5}$$




      Okay so my teacher gave me this problem, and told me to strictly solve it without using derivatives. Obviously with using derivatives it's pretty easy, just find where $f'(x_0)=0$, and check it's second derivative in $x_0$ to see if it's a maximum or minimum.



      So I was thinking about this:



      Since this function is written as a fraction, the lowest possible value should be when the numerator value is the lowest, while the denominator is the highest possible value.



      BUT, again to find the highest and lowest value of both I could use derivatives again, which again isn't the point.



      I can see that both the numerator and denominator of this fraction is always positive for every $x$, so maybe there's a hint that I can't see there?



      Maybe I could use limits too, but I'm not sure how.







      functions






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 12 '18 at 23:22









      AleksaAleksa

      33612




      33612






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9












          $begingroup$

          If $kappa$ belongs to the range of $f$, it follows that
          $$3x^2+6x+6 = kappa(x^2+4x+5)$$
          has a real solution, hence the discriminant of
          $$ (3-kappa)x^2+(6-4kappa)x+(6-5kappa) $$
          i.e. $-4kappa^2+36kappa-36$, is non-negative. It follows that the extreme values of $f$ are given by the roots of $-4kappa^2+36kappa-36$, i.e. $color{red}{frac{3}{2}left(3pmsqrt{5}right)}$.



          I believe this (exploiting discriminants) was the ancient method for the determination of the stationary values of rational functions, before the Method of Fluxions. But relics have their elegance!






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            @Chickenmancer: the roots of the polynomial in $kappa$ are the same, so why to waste time in performing useless simplifications?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:39










          • $begingroup$
            @Chickenmancer: oh, sorry, I see. There was a typo, now fixed.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:43










          • $begingroup$
            Okay, so I got everything you said and I see it's correct, but could you clear up how do we know that finding the roots of $-4k^2+36k-36$ gives the extreme values?
            $endgroup$
            – Aleksa
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:47








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Aleksa: for $kappa$ larger than $frac{3}{2}(3+sqrt{5})$ or smaller than $frac{3}{2}(3-sqrt{5})$ the equation $f(x)=kappa$ has no real solution, so...
            $endgroup$
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:48










          • $begingroup$
            Oh got it, pretty obvious, thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Aleksa
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:49



















          0












          $begingroup$

          enter image description here



          One can cast this issue into an eigenvalue problem.



          I recognize that, evidently, this involves much more computation than the straightforward method given by @Jack D'Aurizio, but see remarks at the bottom.



          Moreover, I understand that probably, you, the OP, haven't already seen these notions, but, who knows...



          Let us define $A=begin{pmatrix}3&3\3&6end{pmatrix}$ and $B=begin{pmatrix}1&2\2&5end{pmatrix}$.



          Let $B=CC^T$ be the Cholesky factorization of $B$, with



          $$C= begin{pmatrix}1&2\0&1end{pmatrix}.$$



          Let $D:=C^{-1}=begin{pmatrix}1&-2\0&1end{pmatrix}.$



          Then the extreme values are the eigenvalues $frac32(3pm sqrt{5})$ of



          $$M:=D^TAD=begin{pmatrix} 3&-3\
          -3&6end{pmatrix}.$$



          Explanation : setting $x=frac{s}{t}$ in the given fraction transforms it into the quotient of 2 quadratic forms :



          $$frac{3x^2+6x+6}{x^2+4x+5}=frac{3s^2+6st+6t^2}{s^2+4st+5t^2}=frac{X^TAX}{X^TBX} with X:=binom{y}{t}tag{1}$$



          (with matrices $A$ and $B$ defined upwards).



          Then transform (1) into the following Rayleigh quotient :



          $$frac{(CX)^T(D^TAD)(CX)}{(CX)^T(CX)} = frac{U^T M U}{U^TU}$$



          which is known to take all its values in $[lambda_{min},lambda_{max}]$.



          Remark : A natural question is : what is the information brought by eigenvectors $U_1=binom{s}{t}=binom{-0.8507}{-0.5257}$ and $U_2=binom{s}{t}=binom{-0.5257}{0.8507}$. Using
          $X_1=C^{-1}U_1=binom{0.2008}{-0.5257}$ and $X_2=C^{-1}U_2=binom{ -2.2270}{0.8507}$, the reader will easily see that they provide information about the abscissas $x=frac{s'}{t'}=frac{0.2008}{-0.5257}=-0.3820$ and $x=frac{-2.2270}{0.8507}=-2.6178$ of points where the minimum and the maximum occur.



          Remarks : The advantage of this method lies on the methodological side :




          • most people working in applied mathematics will appreciate to have a method handling eigenvalues instead of specific numbers for which one has to rediscover properties, like sensibility to variations.


          • it can be extended to as many variables as desired, like finding the min and max values of $$frac{3x^2+5y^2+6z^2-2xz+3yz}{x^2+2y^2+3z^2-2xz}.$$ (for any $x,y,z$).







          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I enjoyed your use of quadratic forms!
            $endgroup$
            – Chickenmancer
            Dec 14 '18 at 5:29










          • $begingroup$
            @Chickenmancer If you want to see another nice application of Linear Algebra, take a look at the following recent question and its answer : math.stackexchange.com/q/3029158
            $endgroup$
            – Jean Marie
            Dec 14 '18 at 6:32













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037371%2ffind-the-highest-and-lowest-possible-value-of-function-fx-3x26x6-over-x2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          9












          $begingroup$

          If $kappa$ belongs to the range of $f$, it follows that
          $$3x^2+6x+6 = kappa(x^2+4x+5)$$
          has a real solution, hence the discriminant of
          $$ (3-kappa)x^2+(6-4kappa)x+(6-5kappa) $$
          i.e. $-4kappa^2+36kappa-36$, is non-negative. It follows that the extreme values of $f$ are given by the roots of $-4kappa^2+36kappa-36$, i.e. $color{red}{frac{3}{2}left(3pmsqrt{5}right)}$.



          I believe this (exploiting discriminants) was the ancient method for the determination of the stationary values of rational functions, before the Method of Fluxions. But relics have their elegance!






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            @Chickenmancer: the roots of the polynomial in $kappa$ are the same, so why to waste time in performing useless simplifications?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:39










          • $begingroup$
            @Chickenmancer: oh, sorry, I see. There was a typo, now fixed.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:43










          • $begingroup$
            Okay, so I got everything you said and I see it's correct, but could you clear up how do we know that finding the roots of $-4k^2+36k-36$ gives the extreme values?
            $endgroup$
            – Aleksa
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:47








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Aleksa: for $kappa$ larger than $frac{3}{2}(3+sqrt{5})$ or smaller than $frac{3}{2}(3-sqrt{5})$ the equation $f(x)=kappa$ has no real solution, so...
            $endgroup$
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:48










          • $begingroup$
            Oh got it, pretty obvious, thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Aleksa
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:49
















          9












          $begingroup$

          If $kappa$ belongs to the range of $f$, it follows that
          $$3x^2+6x+6 = kappa(x^2+4x+5)$$
          has a real solution, hence the discriminant of
          $$ (3-kappa)x^2+(6-4kappa)x+(6-5kappa) $$
          i.e. $-4kappa^2+36kappa-36$, is non-negative. It follows that the extreme values of $f$ are given by the roots of $-4kappa^2+36kappa-36$, i.e. $color{red}{frac{3}{2}left(3pmsqrt{5}right)}$.



          I believe this (exploiting discriminants) was the ancient method for the determination of the stationary values of rational functions, before the Method of Fluxions. But relics have their elegance!






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            @Chickenmancer: the roots of the polynomial in $kappa$ are the same, so why to waste time in performing useless simplifications?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:39










          • $begingroup$
            @Chickenmancer: oh, sorry, I see. There was a typo, now fixed.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:43










          • $begingroup$
            Okay, so I got everything you said and I see it's correct, but could you clear up how do we know that finding the roots of $-4k^2+36k-36$ gives the extreme values?
            $endgroup$
            – Aleksa
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:47








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Aleksa: for $kappa$ larger than $frac{3}{2}(3+sqrt{5})$ or smaller than $frac{3}{2}(3-sqrt{5})$ the equation $f(x)=kappa$ has no real solution, so...
            $endgroup$
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:48










          • $begingroup$
            Oh got it, pretty obvious, thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Aleksa
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:49














          9












          9








          9





          $begingroup$

          If $kappa$ belongs to the range of $f$, it follows that
          $$3x^2+6x+6 = kappa(x^2+4x+5)$$
          has a real solution, hence the discriminant of
          $$ (3-kappa)x^2+(6-4kappa)x+(6-5kappa) $$
          i.e. $-4kappa^2+36kappa-36$, is non-negative. It follows that the extreme values of $f$ are given by the roots of $-4kappa^2+36kappa-36$, i.e. $color{red}{frac{3}{2}left(3pmsqrt{5}right)}$.



          I believe this (exploiting discriminants) was the ancient method for the determination of the stationary values of rational functions, before the Method of Fluxions. But relics have their elegance!






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          If $kappa$ belongs to the range of $f$, it follows that
          $$3x^2+6x+6 = kappa(x^2+4x+5)$$
          has a real solution, hence the discriminant of
          $$ (3-kappa)x^2+(6-4kappa)x+(6-5kappa) $$
          i.e. $-4kappa^2+36kappa-36$, is non-negative. It follows that the extreme values of $f$ are given by the roots of $-4kappa^2+36kappa-36$, i.e. $color{red}{frac{3}{2}left(3pmsqrt{5}right)}$.



          I believe this (exploiting discriminants) was the ancient method for the determination of the stationary values of rational functions, before the Method of Fluxions. But relics have their elegance!







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 12 '18 at 23:43

























          answered Dec 12 '18 at 23:29









          Jack D'AurizioJack D'Aurizio

          290k33282664




          290k33282664












          • $begingroup$
            @Chickenmancer: the roots of the polynomial in $kappa$ are the same, so why to waste time in performing useless simplifications?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:39










          • $begingroup$
            @Chickenmancer: oh, sorry, I see. There was a typo, now fixed.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:43










          • $begingroup$
            Okay, so I got everything you said and I see it's correct, but could you clear up how do we know that finding the roots of $-4k^2+36k-36$ gives the extreme values?
            $endgroup$
            – Aleksa
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:47








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Aleksa: for $kappa$ larger than $frac{3}{2}(3+sqrt{5})$ or smaller than $frac{3}{2}(3-sqrt{5})$ the equation $f(x)=kappa$ has no real solution, so...
            $endgroup$
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:48










          • $begingroup$
            Oh got it, pretty obvious, thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Aleksa
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:49


















          • $begingroup$
            @Chickenmancer: the roots of the polynomial in $kappa$ are the same, so why to waste time in performing useless simplifications?
            $endgroup$
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:39










          • $begingroup$
            @Chickenmancer: oh, sorry, I see. There was a typo, now fixed.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:43










          • $begingroup$
            Okay, so I got everything you said and I see it's correct, but could you clear up how do we know that finding the roots of $-4k^2+36k-36$ gives the extreme values?
            $endgroup$
            – Aleksa
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:47








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Aleksa: for $kappa$ larger than $frac{3}{2}(3+sqrt{5})$ or smaller than $frac{3}{2}(3-sqrt{5})$ the equation $f(x)=kappa$ has no real solution, so...
            $endgroup$
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:48










          • $begingroup$
            Oh got it, pretty obvious, thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Aleksa
            Dec 12 '18 at 23:49
















          $begingroup$
          @Chickenmancer: the roots of the polynomial in $kappa$ are the same, so why to waste time in performing useless simplifications?
          $endgroup$
          – Jack D'Aurizio
          Dec 12 '18 at 23:39




          $begingroup$
          @Chickenmancer: the roots of the polynomial in $kappa$ are the same, so why to waste time in performing useless simplifications?
          $endgroup$
          – Jack D'Aurizio
          Dec 12 '18 at 23:39












          $begingroup$
          @Chickenmancer: oh, sorry, I see. There was a typo, now fixed.
          $endgroup$
          – Jack D'Aurizio
          Dec 12 '18 at 23:43




          $begingroup$
          @Chickenmancer: oh, sorry, I see. There was a typo, now fixed.
          $endgroup$
          – Jack D'Aurizio
          Dec 12 '18 at 23:43












          $begingroup$
          Okay, so I got everything you said and I see it's correct, but could you clear up how do we know that finding the roots of $-4k^2+36k-36$ gives the extreme values?
          $endgroup$
          – Aleksa
          Dec 12 '18 at 23:47






          $begingroup$
          Okay, so I got everything you said and I see it's correct, but could you clear up how do we know that finding the roots of $-4k^2+36k-36$ gives the extreme values?
          $endgroup$
          – Aleksa
          Dec 12 '18 at 23:47






          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @Aleksa: for $kappa$ larger than $frac{3}{2}(3+sqrt{5})$ or smaller than $frac{3}{2}(3-sqrt{5})$ the equation $f(x)=kappa$ has no real solution, so...
          $endgroup$
          – Jack D'Aurizio
          Dec 12 '18 at 23:48




          $begingroup$
          @Aleksa: for $kappa$ larger than $frac{3}{2}(3+sqrt{5})$ or smaller than $frac{3}{2}(3-sqrt{5})$ the equation $f(x)=kappa$ has no real solution, so...
          $endgroup$
          – Jack D'Aurizio
          Dec 12 '18 at 23:48












          $begingroup$
          Oh got it, pretty obvious, thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – Aleksa
          Dec 12 '18 at 23:49




          $begingroup$
          Oh got it, pretty obvious, thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – Aleksa
          Dec 12 '18 at 23:49











          0












          $begingroup$

          enter image description here



          One can cast this issue into an eigenvalue problem.



          I recognize that, evidently, this involves much more computation than the straightforward method given by @Jack D'Aurizio, but see remarks at the bottom.



          Moreover, I understand that probably, you, the OP, haven't already seen these notions, but, who knows...



          Let us define $A=begin{pmatrix}3&3\3&6end{pmatrix}$ and $B=begin{pmatrix}1&2\2&5end{pmatrix}$.



          Let $B=CC^T$ be the Cholesky factorization of $B$, with



          $$C= begin{pmatrix}1&2\0&1end{pmatrix}.$$



          Let $D:=C^{-1}=begin{pmatrix}1&-2\0&1end{pmatrix}.$



          Then the extreme values are the eigenvalues $frac32(3pm sqrt{5})$ of



          $$M:=D^TAD=begin{pmatrix} 3&-3\
          -3&6end{pmatrix}.$$



          Explanation : setting $x=frac{s}{t}$ in the given fraction transforms it into the quotient of 2 quadratic forms :



          $$frac{3x^2+6x+6}{x^2+4x+5}=frac{3s^2+6st+6t^2}{s^2+4st+5t^2}=frac{X^TAX}{X^TBX} with X:=binom{y}{t}tag{1}$$



          (with matrices $A$ and $B$ defined upwards).



          Then transform (1) into the following Rayleigh quotient :



          $$frac{(CX)^T(D^TAD)(CX)}{(CX)^T(CX)} = frac{U^T M U}{U^TU}$$



          which is known to take all its values in $[lambda_{min},lambda_{max}]$.



          Remark : A natural question is : what is the information brought by eigenvectors $U_1=binom{s}{t}=binom{-0.8507}{-0.5257}$ and $U_2=binom{s}{t}=binom{-0.5257}{0.8507}$. Using
          $X_1=C^{-1}U_1=binom{0.2008}{-0.5257}$ and $X_2=C^{-1}U_2=binom{ -2.2270}{0.8507}$, the reader will easily see that they provide information about the abscissas $x=frac{s'}{t'}=frac{0.2008}{-0.5257}=-0.3820$ and $x=frac{-2.2270}{0.8507}=-2.6178$ of points where the minimum and the maximum occur.



          Remarks : The advantage of this method lies on the methodological side :




          • most people working in applied mathematics will appreciate to have a method handling eigenvalues instead of specific numbers for which one has to rediscover properties, like sensibility to variations.


          • it can be extended to as many variables as desired, like finding the min and max values of $$frac{3x^2+5y^2+6z^2-2xz+3yz}{x^2+2y^2+3z^2-2xz}.$$ (for any $x,y,z$).







          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I enjoyed your use of quadratic forms!
            $endgroup$
            – Chickenmancer
            Dec 14 '18 at 5:29










          • $begingroup$
            @Chickenmancer If you want to see another nice application of Linear Algebra, take a look at the following recent question and its answer : math.stackexchange.com/q/3029158
            $endgroup$
            – Jean Marie
            Dec 14 '18 at 6:32


















          0












          $begingroup$

          enter image description here



          One can cast this issue into an eigenvalue problem.



          I recognize that, evidently, this involves much more computation than the straightforward method given by @Jack D'Aurizio, but see remarks at the bottom.



          Moreover, I understand that probably, you, the OP, haven't already seen these notions, but, who knows...



          Let us define $A=begin{pmatrix}3&3\3&6end{pmatrix}$ and $B=begin{pmatrix}1&2\2&5end{pmatrix}$.



          Let $B=CC^T$ be the Cholesky factorization of $B$, with



          $$C= begin{pmatrix}1&2\0&1end{pmatrix}.$$



          Let $D:=C^{-1}=begin{pmatrix}1&-2\0&1end{pmatrix}.$



          Then the extreme values are the eigenvalues $frac32(3pm sqrt{5})$ of



          $$M:=D^TAD=begin{pmatrix} 3&-3\
          -3&6end{pmatrix}.$$



          Explanation : setting $x=frac{s}{t}$ in the given fraction transforms it into the quotient of 2 quadratic forms :



          $$frac{3x^2+6x+6}{x^2+4x+5}=frac{3s^2+6st+6t^2}{s^2+4st+5t^2}=frac{X^TAX}{X^TBX} with X:=binom{y}{t}tag{1}$$



          (with matrices $A$ and $B$ defined upwards).



          Then transform (1) into the following Rayleigh quotient :



          $$frac{(CX)^T(D^TAD)(CX)}{(CX)^T(CX)} = frac{U^T M U}{U^TU}$$



          which is known to take all its values in $[lambda_{min},lambda_{max}]$.



          Remark : A natural question is : what is the information brought by eigenvectors $U_1=binom{s}{t}=binom{-0.8507}{-0.5257}$ and $U_2=binom{s}{t}=binom{-0.5257}{0.8507}$. Using
          $X_1=C^{-1}U_1=binom{0.2008}{-0.5257}$ and $X_2=C^{-1}U_2=binom{ -2.2270}{0.8507}$, the reader will easily see that they provide information about the abscissas $x=frac{s'}{t'}=frac{0.2008}{-0.5257}=-0.3820$ and $x=frac{-2.2270}{0.8507}=-2.6178$ of points where the minimum and the maximum occur.



          Remarks : The advantage of this method lies on the methodological side :




          • most people working in applied mathematics will appreciate to have a method handling eigenvalues instead of specific numbers for which one has to rediscover properties, like sensibility to variations.


          • it can be extended to as many variables as desired, like finding the min and max values of $$frac{3x^2+5y^2+6z^2-2xz+3yz}{x^2+2y^2+3z^2-2xz}.$$ (for any $x,y,z$).







          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I enjoyed your use of quadratic forms!
            $endgroup$
            – Chickenmancer
            Dec 14 '18 at 5:29










          • $begingroup$
            @Chickenmancer If you want to see another nice application of Linear Algebra, take a look at the following recent question and its answer : math.stackexchange.com/q/3029158
            $endgroup$
            – Jean Marie
            Dec 14 '18 at 6:32
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          enter image description here



          One can cast this issue into an eigenvalue problem.



          I recognize that, evidently, this involves much more computation than the straightforward method given by @Jack D'Aurizio, but see remarks at the bottom.



          Moreover, I understand that probably, you, the OP, haven't already seen these notions, but, who knows...



          Let us define $A=begin{pmatrix}3&3\3&6end{pmatrix}$ and $B=begin{pmatrix}1&2\2&5end{pmatrix}$.



          Let $B=CC^T$ be the Cholesky factorization of $B$, with



          $$C= begin{pmatrix}1&2\0&1end{pmatrix}.$$



          Let $D:=C^{-1}=begin{pmatrix}1&-2\0&1end{pmatrix}.$



          Then the extreme values are the eigenvalues $frac32(3pm sqrt{5})$ of



          $$M:=D^TAD=begin{pmatrix} 3&-3\
          -3&6end{pmatrix}.$$



          Explanation : setting $x=frac{s}{t}$ in the given fraction transforms it into the quotient of 2 quadratic forms :



          $$frac{3x^2+6x+6}{x^2+4x+5}=frac{3s^2+6st+6t^2}{s^2+4st+5t^2}=frac{X^TAX}{X^TBX} with X:=binom{y}{t}tag{1}$$



          (with matrices $A$ and $B$ defined upwards).



          Then transform (1) into the following Rayleigh quotient :



          $$frac{(CX)^T(D^TAD)(CX)}{(CX)^T(CX)} = frac{U^T M U}{U^TU}$$



          which is known to take all its values in $[lambda_{min},lambda_{max}]$.



          Remark : A natural question is : what is the information brought by eigenvectors $U_1=binom{s}{t}=binom{-0.8507}{-0.5257}$ and $U_2=binom{s}{t}=binom{-0.5257}{0.8507}$. Using
          $X_1=C^{-1}U_1=binom{0.2008}{-0.5257}$ and $X_2=C^{-1}U_2=binom{ -2.2270}{0.8507}$, the reader will easily see that they provide information about the abscissas $x=frac{s'}{t'}=frac{0.2008}{-0.5257}=-0.3820$ and $x=frac{-2.2270}{0.8507}=-2.6178$ of points where the minimum and the maximum occur.



          Remarks : The advantage of this method lies on the methodological side :




          • most people working in applied mathematics will appreciate to have a method handling eigenvalues instead of specific numbers for which one has to rediscover properties, like sensibility to variations.


          • it can be extended to as many variables as desired, like finding the min and max values of $$frac{3x^2+5y^2+6z^2-2xz+3yz}{x^2+2y^2+3z^2-2xz}.$$ (for any $x,y,z$).







          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          enter image description here



          One can cast this issue into an eigenvalue problem.



          I recognize that, evidently, this involves much more computation than the straightforward method given by @Jack D'Aurizio, but see remarks at the bottom.



          Moreover, I understand that probably, you, the OP, haven't already seen these notions, but, who knows...



          Let us define $A=begin{pmatrix}3&3\3&6end{pmatrix}$ and $B=begin{pmatrix}1&2\2&5end{pmatrix}$.



          Let $B=CC^T$ be the Cholesky factorization of $B$, with



          $$C= begin{pmatrix}1&2\0&1end{pmatrix}.$$



          Let $D:=C^{-1}=begin{pmatrix}1&-2\0&1end{pmatrix}.$



          Then the extreme values are the eigenvalues $frac32(3pm sqrt{5})$ of



          $$M:=D^TAD=begin{pmatrix} 3&-3\
          -3&6end{pmatrix}.$$



          Explanation : setting $x=frac{s}{t}$ in the given fraction transforms it into the quotient of 2 quadratic forms :



          $$frac{3x^2+6x+6}{x^2+4x+5}=frac{3s^2+6st+6t^2}{s^2+4st+5t^2}=frac{X^TAX}{X^TBX} with X:=binom{y}{t}tag{1}$$



          (with matrices $A$ and $B$ defined upwards).



          Then transform (1) into the following Rayleigh quotient :



          $$frac{(CX)^T(D^TAD)(CX)}{(CX)^T(CX)} = frac{U^T M U}{U^TU}$$



          which is known to take all its values in $[lambda_{min},lambda_{max}]$.



          Remark : A natural question is : what is the information brought by eigenvectors $U_1=binom{s}{t}=binom{-0.8507}{-0.5257}$ and $U_2=binom{s}{t}=binom{-0.5257}{0.8507}$. Using
          $X_1=C^{-1}U_1=binom{0.2008}{-0.5257}$ and $X_2=C^{-1}U_2=binom{ -2.2270}{0.8507}$, the reader will easily see that they provide information about the abscissas $x=frac{s'}{t'}=frac{0.2008}{-0.5257}=-0.3820$ and $x=frac{-2.2270}{0.8507}=-2.6178$ of points where the minimum and the maximum occur.



          Remarks : The advantage of this method lies on the methodological side :




          • most people working in applied mathematics will appreciate to have a method handling eigenvalues instead of specific numbers for which one has to rediscover properties, like sensibility to variations.


          • it can be extended to as many variables as desired, like finding the min and max values of $$frac{3x^2+5y^2+6z^2-2xz+3yz}{x^2+2y^2+3z^2-2xz}.$$ (for any $x,y,z$).








          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 13 '18 at 13:13

























          answered Dec 13 '18 at 0:44









          Jean MarieJean Marie

          30.3k42051




          30.3k42051








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I enjoyed your use of quadratic forms!
            $endgroup$
            – Chickenmancer
            Dec 14 '18 at 5:29










          • $begingroup$
            @Chickenmancer If you want to see another nice application of Linear Algebra, take a look at the following recent question and its answer : math.stackexchange.com/q/3029158
            $endgroup$
            – Jean Marie
            Dec 14 '18 at 6:32
















          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I enjoyed your use of quadratic forms!
            $endgroup$
            – Chickenmancer
            Dec 14 '18 at 5:29










          • $begingroup$
            @Chickenmancer If you want to see another nice application of Linear Algebra, take a look at the following recent question and its answer : math.stackexchange.com/q/3029158
            $endgroup$
            – Jean Marie
            Dec 14 '18 at 6:32










          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          I enjoyed your use of quadratic forms!
          $endgroup$
          – Chickenmancer
          Dec 14 '18 at 5:29




          $begingroup$
          I enjoyed your use of quadratic forms!
          $endgroup$
          – Chickenmancer
          Dec 14 '18 at 5:29












          $begingroup$
          @Chickenmancer If you want to see another nice application of Linear Algebra, take a look at the following recent question and its answer : math.stackexchange.com/q/3029158
          $endgroup$
          – Jean Marie
          Dec 14 '18 at 6:32






          $begingroup$
          @Chickenmancer If you want to see another nice application of Linear Algebra, take a look at the following recent question and its answer : math.stackexchange.com/q/3029158
          $endgroup$
          – Jean Marie
          Dec 14 '18 at 6:32




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037371%2ffind-the-highest-and-lowest-possible-value-of-function-fx-3x26x6-over-x2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Verónica Boquete

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten