Continuous extension of a function to the Stone-Cech compactification












1












$begingroup$


Let $C(X)$ be the set of all continuous, real-valued functions on a Tychonoff (completely regular)
topological space $X$ and let $beta X$ be the Stone-Cech compactification of $X$. Now let $fin C(X)$ such that $f(X)={0, 1}$ and $f^beta$ be an extension of $f$ to $beta X$, that is, $f^betain C(beta X)$. How can we show that $f^beta(beta X)={0, 1}$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Let $C(X)$ be the set of all continuous, real-valued functions on a Tychonoff (completely regular)
    topological space $X$ and let $beta X$ be the Stone-Cech compactification of $X$. Now let $fin C(X)$ such that $f(X)={0, 1}$ and $f^beta$ be an extension of $f$ to $beta X$, that is, $f^betain C(beta X)$. How can we show that $f^beta(beta X)={0, 1}$?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Let $C(X)$ be the set of all continuous, real-valued functions on a Tychonoff (completely regular)
      topological space $X$ and let $beta X$ be the Stone-Cech compactification of $X$. Now let $fin C(X)$ such that $f(X)={0, 1}$ and $f^beta$ be an extension of $f$ to $beta X$, that is, $f^betain C(beta X)$. How can we show that $f^beta(beta X)={0, 1}$?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $C(X)$ be the set of all continuous, real-valued functions on a Tychonoff (completely regular)
      topological space $X$ and let $beta X$ be the Stone-Cech compactification of $X$. Now let $fin C(X)$ such that $f(X)={0, 1}$ and $f^beta$ be an extension of $f$ to $beta X$, that is, $f^betain C(beta X)$. How can we show that $f^beta(beta X)={0, 1}$?







      general-topology compactification






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 28 '18 at 13:54









      F M

      3,09652341




      3,09652341










      asked Dec 25 '18 at 10:22









      Andy.GAndy.G

      935




      935






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          The Stone-Čech compactification has a very strong property: if $fcolon Xto Y$ is a continuous map with $Y$ compact, then $f$ can be (uniquely) extended to $beta fcolonbeta Xto Y$. See Universal property and functoriality on Wikipedia.



          Since ${0,1}$ is compact, you're done.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            $X$ is dense in $beta(X)$. Hence $f^{beta} (beta(X)) = f^{beta} (overline {X}) $ which is contained in the closure of ${0,1}$ (by continuity) so it is contained in ${0,1}$. Reverse inclusion follows by the fact that $f^{beta}$ extends $f$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$














              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051992%2fcontinuous-extension-of-a-function-to-the-stone-cech-compactification%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2












              $begingroup$

              The Stone-Čech compactification has a very strong property: if $fcolon Xto Y$ is a continuous map with $Y$ compact, then $f$ can be (uniquely) extended to $beta fcolonbeta Xto Y$. See Universal property and functoriality on Wikipedia.



              Since ${0,1}$ is compact, you're done.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                The Stone-Čech compactification has a very strong property: if $fcolon Xto Y$ is a continuous map with $Y$ compact, then $f$ can be (uniquely) extended to $beta fcolonbeta Xto Y$. See Universal property and functoriality on Wikipedia.



                Since ${0,1}$ is compact, you're done.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  The Stone-Čech compactification has a very strong property: if $fcolon Xto Y$ is a continuous map with $Y$ compact, then $f$ can be (uniquely) extended to $beta fcolonbeta Xto Y$. See Universal property and functoriality on Wikipedia.



                  Since ${0,1}$ is compact, you're done.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  The Stone-Čech compactification has a very strong property: if $fcolon Xto Y$ is a continuous map with $Y$ compact, then $f$ can be (uniquely) extended to $beta fcolonbeta Xto Y$. See Universal property and functoriality on Wikipedia.



                  Since ${0,1}$ is compact, you're done.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 25 '18 at 11:12









                  egregegreg

                  185k1486208




                  185k1486208























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      $X$ is dense in $beta(X)$. Hence $f^{beta} (beta(X)) = f^{beta} (overline {X}) $ which is contained in the closure of ${0,1}$ (by continuity) so it is contained in ${0,1}$. Reverse inclusion follows by the fact that $f^{beta}$ extends $f$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        $X$ is dense in $beta(X)$. Hence $f^{beta} (beta(X)) = f^{beta} (overline {X}) $ which is contained in the closure of ${0,1}$ (by continuity) so it is contained in ${0,1}$. Reverse inclusion follows by the fact that $f^{beta}$ extends $f$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          $X$ is dense in $beta(X)$. Hence $f^{beta} (beta(X)) = f^{beta} (overline {X}) $ which is contained in the closure of ${0,1}$ (by continuity) so it is contained in ${0,1}$. Reverse inclusion follows by the fact that $f^{beta}$ extends $f$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          $X$ is dense in $beta(X)$. Hence $f^{beta} (beta(X)) = f^{beta} (overline {X}) $ which is contained in the closure of ${0,1}$ (by continuity) so it is contained in ${0,1}$. Reverse inclusion follows by the fact that $f^{beta}$ extends $f$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Dec 25 '18 at 10:36

























                          answered Dec 25 '18 at 10:28









                          Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

                          72.9k53170




                          72.9k53170






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051992%2fcontinuous-extension-of-a-function-to-the-stone-cech-compactification%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Willebadessen

                              Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                              Residenzschloss Arolsen