Criterion for weakly lower semicontinuity in problems of calculus of variations
$begingroup$
Let’s say I have to minimize a certain integral functional $F(u)= int_{Omega} L(x,u,nabla u)$ with $Omega$ regular and $u$ in a certain Sobolev space (don’t really care to be precise, I just want a general idea). To prove there exists a minimum, let’s say I want to use the direct method. No problems for compactness, but when I want the lower semicontinuity for weakly convergent sequences (the derivatives, typically) I am kinda lost. I know the norm is weakly lower semicontinuous, but is there a simple general criterion to have weakly lower semicontinuity, in general?
optimization sobolev-spaces calculus-of-variations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let’s say I have to minimize a certain integral functional $F(u)= int_{Omega} L(x,u,nabla u)$ with $Omega$ regular and $u$ in a certain Sobolev space (don’t really care to be precise, I just want a general idea). To prove there exists a minimum, let’s say I want to use the direct method. No problems for compactness, but when I want the lower semicontinuity for weakly convergent sequences (the derivatives, typically) I am kinda lost. I know the norm is weakly lower semicontinuous, but is there a simple general criterion to have weakly lower semicontinuity, in general?
optimization sobolev-spaces calculus-of-variations
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If I'm remembering correctly a convexity assumption on the lagrangian $L$ is sufficient to get the w.l.s.c. I think it's in Evans's book? Or maybe Jost's.
$endgroup$
– Jose27
Dec 31 '18 at 19:08
$begingroup$
Convexity and strong semicontinuity is enough, indeed. The problem is that in dimensions greater than 1 you usually only have $L^p$ convergence for the sequence. I mean, if I had uniform convergence then a a continuous Lagrangian would work. But with $L^p$ convergence, how do I have strong lower semicontinuity given strong $L^p$ convergence?
$endgroup$
– tommy1996q
Dec 31 '18 at 19:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let’s say I have to minimize a certain integral functional $F(u)= int_{Omega} L(x,u,nabla u)$ with $Omega$ regular and $u$ in a certain Sobolev space (don’t really care to be precise, I just want a general idea). To prove there exists a minimum, let’s say I want to use the direct method. No problems for compactness, but when I want the lower semicontinuity for weakly convergent sequences (the derivatives, typically) I am kinda lost. I know the norm is weakly lower semicontinuous, but is there a simple general criterion to have weakly lower semicontinuity, in general?
optimization sobolev-spaces calculus-of-variations
$endgroup$
Let’s say I have to minimize a certain integral functional $F(u)= int_{Omega} L(x,u,nabla u)$ with $Omega$ regular and $u$ in a certain Sobolev space (don’t really care to be precise, I just want a general idea). To prove there exists a minimum, let’s say I want to use the direct method. No problems for compactness, but when I want the lower semicontinuity for weakly convergent sequences (the derivatives, typically) I am kinda lost. I know the norm is weakly lower semicontinuous, but is there a simple general criterion to have weakly lower semicontinuity, in general?
optimization sobolev-spaces calculus-of-variations
optimization sobolev-spaces calculus-of-variations
asked Dec 31 '18 at 15:29
tommy1996qtommy1996q
606415
606415
$begingroup$
If I'm remembering correctly a convexity assumption on the lagrangian $L$ is sufficient to get the w.l.s.c. I think it's in Evans's book? Or maybe Jost's.
$endgroup$
– Jose27
Dec 31 '18 at 19:08
$begingroup$
Convexity and strong semicontinuity is enough, indeed. The problem is that in dimensions greater than 1 you usually only have $L^p$ convergence for the sequence. I mean, if I had uniform convergence then a a continuous Lagrangian would work. But with $L^p$ convergence, how do I have strong lower semicontinuity given strong $L^p$ convergence?
$endgroup$
– tommy1996q
Dec 31 '18 at 19:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If I'm remembering correctly a convexity assumption on the lagrangian $L$ is sufficient to get the w.l.s.c. I think it's in Evans's book? Or maybe Jost's.
$endgroup$
– Jose27
Dec 31 '18 at 19:08
$begingroup$
Convexity and strong semicontinuity is enough, indeed. The problem is that in dimensions greater than 1 you usually only have $L^p$ convergence for the sequence. I mean, if I had uniform convergence then a a continuous Lagrangian would work. But with $L^p$ convergence, how do I have strong lower semicontinuity given strong $L^p$ convergence?
$endgroup$
– tommy1996q
Dec 31 '18 at 19:34
$begingroup$
If I'm remembering correctly a convexity assumption on the lagrangian $L$ is sufficient to get the w.l.s.c. I think it's in Evans's book? Or maybe Jost's.
$endgroup$
– Jose27
Dec 31 '18 at 19:08
$begingroup$
If I'm remembering correctly a convexity assumption on the lagrangian $L$ is sufficient to get the w.l.s.c. I think it's in Evans's book? Or maybe Jost's.
$endgroup$
– Jose27
Dec 31 '18 at 19:08
$begingroup$
Convexity and strong semicontinuity is enough, indeed. The problem is that in dimensions greater than 1 you usually only have $L^p$ convergence for the sequence. I mean, if I had uniform convergence then a a continuous Lagrangian would work. But with $L^p$ convergence, how do I have strong lower semicontinuity given strong $L^p$ convergence?
$endgroup$
– tommy1996q
Dec 31 '18 at 19:34
$begingroup$
Convexity and strong semicontinuity is enough, indeed. The problem is that in dimensions greater than 1 you usually only have $L^p$ convergence for the sequence. I mean, if I had uniform convergence then a a continuous Lagrangian would work. But with $L^p$ convergence, how do I have strong lower semicontinuity given strong $L^p$ convergence?
$endgroup$
– tommy1996q
Dec 31 '18 at 19:34
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057808%2fcriterion-for-weakly-lower-semicontinuity-in-problems-of-calculus-of-variations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057808%2fcriterion-for-weakly-lower-semicontinuity-in-problems-of-calculus-of-variations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
If I'm remembering correctly a convexity assumption on the lagrangian $L$ is sufficient to get the w.l.s.c. I think it's in Evans's book? Or maybe Jost's.
$endgroup$
– Jose27
Dec 31 '18 at 19:08
$begingroup$
Convexity and strong semicontinuity is enough, indeed. The problem is that in dimensions greater than 1 you usually only have $L^p$ convergence for the sequence. I mean, if I had uniform convergence then a a continuous Lagrangian would work. But with $L^p$ convergence, how do I have strong lower semicontinuity given strong $L^p$ convergence?
$endgroup$
– tommy1996q
Dec 31 '18 at 19:34