Cursor Replacement for Newbies
I'd like to know what the general replacement is for a cursor. The general implementation of a cursor I see out and about is
DECLARE @variable INT, @sqlstr NVARCHAR(MAX)
DECLARE cursor_name CURSOR
FOR select_statement --essentially to get an array for @variable
--usually it's a subset of unique ids for accounts, clients, parts, etc
OPEN cursor_name
FETCH NEXT FROM cursor_name INTO @variable
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @sqlstr = N'
--some query that uses '+ str(@variable) +' to do dirty work
'
EXEC sp_executesql @sqlstr
FETCH NEXT FROM cursor_name INTO @variable
END
CLOSE cursor_name
DEALLOCATE cursor_name
Since so many people are anti-cursor (with a nod to SO: Why do people hate cursors) what is the general replacement for the general implementation (preferably SQL Server)?
sql-server cursors
add a comment |
I'd like to know what the general replacement is for a cursor. The general implementation of a cursor I see out and about is
DECLARE @variable INT, @sqlstr NVARCHAR(MAX)
DECLARE cursor_name CURSOR
FOR select_statement --essentially to get an array for @variable
--usually it's a subset of unique ids for accounts, clients, parts, etc
OPEN cursor_name
FETCH NEXT FROM cursor_name INTO @variable
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @sqlstr = N'
--some query that uses '+ str(@variable) +' to do dirty work
'
EXEC sp_executesql @sqlstr
FETCH NEXT FROM cursor_name INTO @variable
END
CLOSE cursor_name
DEALLOCATE cursor_name
Since so many people are anti-cursor (with a nod to SO: Why do people hate cursors) what is the general replacement for the general implementation (preferably SQL Server)?
sql-server cursors
add a comment |
I'd like to know what the general replacement is for a cursor. The general implementation of a cursor I see out and about is
DECLARE @variable INT, @sqlstr NVARCHAR(MAX)
DECLARE cursor_name CURSOR
FOR select_statement --essentially to get an array for @variable
--usually it's a subset of unique ids for accounts, clients, parts, etc
OPEN cursor_name
FETCH NEXT FROM cursor_name INTO @variable
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @sqlstr = N'
--some query that uses '+ str(@variable) +' to do dirty work
'
EXEC sp_executesql @sqlstr
FETCH NEXT FROM cursor_name INTO @variable
END
CLOSE cursor_name
DEALLOCATE cursor_name
Since so many people are anti-cursor (with a nod to SO: Why do people hate cursors) what is the general replacement for the general implementation (preferably SQL Server)?
sql-server cursors
I'd like to know what the general replacement is for a cursor. The general implementation of a cursor I see out and about is
DECLARE @variable INT, @sqlstr NVARCHAR(MAX)
DECLARE cursor_name CURSOR
FOR select_statement --essentially to get an array for @variable
--usually it's a subset of unique ids for accounts, clients, parts, etc
OPEN cursor_name
FETCH NEXT FROM cursor_name INTO @variable
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @sqlstr = N'
--some query that uses '+ str(@variable) +' to do dirty work
'
EXEC sp_executesql @sqlstr
FETCH NEXT FROM cursor_name INTO @variable
END
CLOSE cursor_name
DEALLOCATE cursor_name
Since so many people are anti-cursor (with a nod to SO: Why do people hate cursors) what is the general replacement for the general implementation (preferably SQL Server)?
sql-server cursors
sql-server cursors
asked 5 hours ago
undrlineundrline
215
215
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
There is no "general replacement" - you hid all the "dirty work" here so it's hard to tell if there is even a specific replacement in this case. There are certainly some specific cases where you're processing a set of rows one row at a time, whether using a cursor, or while loop, or any other iterative process, where converting to a set-based process that processes all the rows at once is much better. But there are other things that just have to be done one row at a time, like executing a stored procedure or some dynamic SQL per row, the same query across multiple databases, etc.
Cursor or not, the problems you're alluding to and linking are the same whether you use declare cursor or some other looping struct (see this post), and are irrelevant when the thing you have to do has to be done one row at a time anyway. So if you provide some specific details about what this cursor is doing, you might get some advice about how to remove the cursor (or that you can't), but your search for a magical eliminate-all-cursors approach that you can apply to all scenarios is going to be pretty frustrating for you.
add a comment |
It depends™
The ability to work around one or multiple cursors, will depend on what is going to be executed inside of this cursor. Without knowing what is going on in it, there is no way to tell. It could be that there is no workaround, and you have to do row by row processing.
Below are a some examples.
Not working in sets
This example is the most basic one, and is simply the fact that you could query your entire dataset or parts of your dataset at once, but the cursor was created and is querying the data row by row. Common ones to replace this with are JOIN
's, CROSS APPLY
/ OUTER APPLY
and others.
Consider the following data set:
CREATE TABLE dbo.Lotr(LotrId int, CharacterName varchar(255), Val varchar(255));
CREATE TABLE dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrATtributeId int, LotrId int, AttrVal varchar(255));
INSERT INTO dbo.Lotr(LotrId,CharacterName,Val)
VALUES(1,'Frodo','Ring')
,(2,'Gandalf','Staff');
INSERT INTO dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrId,LotrATtributeId,AttrVal)
VALUES(1,1,'RingAttribute1')
,(1,2,'RingAttribute2')
,(1,3,'RingAttribute3')
,(2,4,'StaffAttribute1')
,(2,5,'StaffAttribute2');
One could try and find each record and it matches separately, by looping over the Lotr
Table.
Cursor:
DECLARE @LotrID int
DECLARE C CURSOR FOR SELECT LotrId from dbo.Lotr;
OPEN C
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrID;
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SELECT LotrATtributeId from dbo.LotrAttributes where LotrId = @LotrID;
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrID;
END
CLOSE C
DEALLOCATE C
Resulting in two result sets
LotrATtributeId
1
2
3
LotrATtributeId
4
5
When this inner join
is used, we get the same result as one resultset.
SELECT LotrATtributeId from dbo.Lotr L
INNER JOIN dbo.LotrAttributes LA
ON L.LotrId = LA.LotrId;
LotrATtributeId
1
2
3
4
5
String Manipulation
A common one is to use FOR XML PATH('')
to replace string manipulations inside of cursors.
Dataset
CREATE TABLE dbo.Lotr(LotrId int, CharacterName varchar(255), Val varchar(255));
CREATE TABLE dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrATtributeId int, LotrId int, AttrVal varchar(255));
INSERT INTO dbo.Lotr(LotrId,CharacterName,Val)
VALUES(1,'Frodo','Ring');
INSERT INTO dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrId,LotrATtributeId,AttrVal)
VALUES(1,1,'RingAttribute1')
,(1,2,'RingAttribute2')
,(1,3,'RingAttribute3');
Double cursor with string manipulation
DECLARE @LotrId int, @CharacterName varchar(255), @Val varchar(255)
DECLARE @LotrATtributeId int, @AttrVal varchar(255)
DECLARE C CURSOR FOR
SELECT LotrId,CharacterName, Val FROM dbo.Lotr
OPEN C
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrId,@CharacterName,@Val
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @CharacterName +='|'+ @Val
DECLARE D CURSOR FOR
SELECT LotrATtributeId, AttrVal FROM dbo.LotrAttributes where LotrId = @LotrId
OPEN D
FETCH NEXT FROM D INTO @LotrATtributeId,@AttrVal
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @CharacterName +='['+@AttrVal+ '],'
FETCH NEXT FROM D INTO @LotrATtributeId,@AttrVal
END
CLOSE D
DEALLOCATE D
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrId,@CharacterName,@Val
END
CLOSE C
DEALLOCATE C
SELECT LEFT(@CharacterName,len(@charactername)-1);
Result
(No column name)
Frodo|Ring[RingAttribute1],[RingAttribute2],[RingAttribute3],
Removing the cursors with FOR XML PATH('')
SELECT L.Charactername +'|'+ L.Val + (SELECT stuff((SELECT ','+QUOTENAME(AttrVal) FROM dbo.LotrAttributes LA WHERE LA.LotrId = L.LotrId FOR XML PATH('')), 1, 1, ''))
FROM
dbo.Lotr L;
*
The real workaround here would be figuring out why the data is presented in this manner, and changing the application/... as to not need it in this format, storing it somewhere, ....
If your hands are tied, this would be the next best thing.
Insert top 10 values into a temp table based on Id's in another table
Data
CREATE TABLE dbo.sometable(InsertTableId int, val varchar(255));
CREATE TABLE dbo.Top10Table(Top10TableId int, InsertTableId int, val varchar(255));
INSERT INTO dbo.sometable(InsertTableId,val)
VALUES(1,'bla')
,(2,'blabla');
INSERT INTO dbo.Top10Table(Top10TableId,InsertTableId,Val)
VALUES(1,1,'WUW')
,(2,1,'WUW')
,(3,1,'WUW');
Cursor
CREATE TABLE #Top10Values(Top10TableId int, InsertTableId int, val varchar(255))
DECLARE @InsertTableId int;
DECLARE C CURSOR FOR select InsertTableId from dbo.sometable;
OPEN C
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @InsertTableId;
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS =0
BEGIN
INSERT INTO #Top10Values(Top10TableId,InsertTableId,val)
SELECT top(10) Top10TableId,InsertTableId,Val FROM dbo.Top10Table
where InsertTableId = @InsertTableId
ORDER BY Top10TableId
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @InsertTableId;
END
CLOSE C
DEALLOCATE C
SELECT * FROM #Top10Values;
DROP TABLE #Top10Values;
Result
Top10TableId InsertTableId val
1 1 WUW
2 1 WUW
3 1 WUW
Replacing the cursor with CROSS APPLY
and a CTE
CREATE TABLE #Top10Values(Top10TableId int, InsertTableId int, val varchar(255));
;WITH CTE
AS
(
select InsertTableId from dbo.sometable
)
INSERT INTO #Top10Values(Top10TableId,InsertTableId,val)
SELECT T1T.Top10TableId,T1T.InsertTableId,T1T.Val
FROM
CTE
CROSS APPLY (SELECT TOP (10) Top10TableId,InsertTableId,Val from dbo.Top10Table T1T
WHERE T1T.InsertTableId = CTE.InsertTableId
) T1T ;
SELECT * FROM #Top10Values;
DROP TABLE #Top10Values;
Other examples
- An example on replacing a cursor to select a dynamic set of items per
Supplier by usingCROSS APPLY
here. - An example on using windowing functions to replace a cursor here.
Sometimes there is no other choice
If you cannot work in sets, and have to do row by row processing, you could still optimize the cursor.
One of the biggest changes in speeding up the cursor is by adding LOCAL FAST_FORWARD
to it.
DECLARE C CURSOR LOCAL FAST_FORWARD FOR SELECT LotrId from dbo.Lotr
Take a look at this blogpost by @AaronBertrand where he explains the possible differences in performance when using or not using cursor settings like LOCAL
& FAST_FORWARD
.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f233884%2fcursor-replacement-for-newbies%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is no "general replacement" - you hid all the "dirty work" here so it's hard to tell if there is even a specific replacement in this case. There are certainly some specific cases where you're processing a set of rows one row at a time, whether using a cursor, or while loop, or any other iterative process, where converting to a set-based process that processes all the rows at once is much better. But there are other things that just have to be done one row at a time, like executing a stored procedure or some dynamic SQL per row, the same query across multiple databases, etc.
Cursor or not, the problems you're alluding to and linking are the same whether you use declare cursor or some other looping struct (see this post), and are irrelevant when the thing you have to do has to be done one row at a time anyway. So if you provide some specific details about what this cursor is doing, you might get some advice about how to remove the cursor (or that you can't), but your search for a magical eliminate-all-cursors approach that you can apply to all scenarios is going to be pretty frustrating for you.
add a comment |
There is no "general replacement" - you hid all the "dirty work" here so it's hard to tell if there is even a specific replacement in this case. There are certainly some specific cases where you're processing a set of rows one row at a time, whether using a cursor, or while loop, or any other iterative process, where converting to a set-based process that processes all the rows at once is much better. But there are other things that just have to be done one row at a time, like executing a stored procedure or some dynamic SQL per row, the same query across multiple databases, etc.
Cursor or not, the problems you're alluding to and linking are the same whether you use declare cursor or some other looping struct (see this post), and are irrelevant when the thing you have to do has to be done one row at a time anyway. So if you provide some specific details about what this cursor is doing, you might get some advice about how to remove the cursor (or that you can't), but your search for a magical eliminate-all-cursors approach that you can apply to all scenarios is going to be pretty frustrating for you.
add a comment |
There is no "general replacement" - you hid all the "dirty work" here so it's hard to tell if there is even a specific replacement in this case. There are certainly some specific cases where you're processing a set of rows one row at a time, whether using a cursor, or while loop, or any other iterative process, where converting to a set-based process that processes all the rows at once is much better. But there are other things that just have to be done one row at a time, like executing a stored procedure or some dynamic SQL per row, the same query across multiple databases, etc.
Cursor or not, the problems you're alluding to and linking are the same whether you use declare cursor or some other looping struct (see this post), and are irrelevant when the thing you have to do has to be done one row at a time anyway. So if you provide some specific details about what this cursor is doing, you might get some advice about how to remove the cursor (or that you can't), but your search for a magical eliminate-all-cursors approach that you can apply to all scenarios is going to be pretty frustrating for you.
There is no "general replacement" - you hid all the "dirty work" here so it's hard to tell if there is even a specific replacement in this case. There are certainly some specific cases where you're processing a set of rows one row at a time, whether using a cursor, or while loop, or any other iterative process, where converting to a set-based process that processes all the rows at once is much better. But there are other things that just have to be done one row at a time, like executing a stored procedure or some dynamic SQL per row, the same query across multiple databases, etc.
Cursor or not, the problems you're alluding to and linking are the same whether you use declare cursor or some other looping struct (see this post), and are irrelevant when the thing you have to do has to be done one row at a time anyway. So if you provide some specific details about what this cursor is doing, you might get some advice about how to remove the cursor (or that you can't), but your search for a magical eliminate-all-cursors approach that you can apply to all scenarios is going to be pretty frustrating for you.
answered 4 hours ago
Aaron Bertrand♦Aaron Bertrand
153k18298493
153k18298493
add a comment |
add a comment |
It depends™
The ability to work around one or multiple cursors, will depend on what is going to be executed inside of this cursor. Without knowing what is going on in it, there is no way to tell. It could be that there is no workaround, and you have to do row by row processing.
Below are a some examples.
Not working in sets
This example is the most basic one, and is simply the fact that you could query your entire dataset or parts of your dataset at once, but the cursor was created and is querying the data row by row. Common ones to replace this with are JOIN
's, CROSS APPLY
/ OUTER APPLY
and others.
Consider the following data set:
CREATE TABLE dbo.Lotr(LotrId int, CharacterName varchar(255), Val varchar(255));
CREATE TABLE dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrATtributeId int, LotrId int, AttrVal varchar(255));
INSERT INTO dbo.Lotr(LotrId,CharacterName,Val)
VALUES(1,'Frodo','Ring')
,(2,'Gandalf','Staff');
INSERT INTO dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrId,LotrATtributeId,AttrVal)
VALUES(1,1,'RingAttribute1')
,(1,2,'RingAttribute2')
,(1,3,'RingAttribute3')
,(2,4,'StaffAttribute1')
,(2,5,'StaffAttribute2');
One could try and find each record and it matches separately, by looping over the Lotr
Table.
Cursor:
DECLARE @LotrID int
DECLARE C CURSOR FOR SELECT LotrId from dbo.Lotr;
OPEN C
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrID;
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SELECT LotrATtributeId from dbo.LotrAttributes where LotrId = @LotrID;
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrID;
END
CLOSE C
DEALLOCATE C
Resulting in two result sets
LotrATtributeId
1
2
3
LotrATtributeId
4
5
When this inner join
is used, we get the same result as one resultset.
SELECT LotrATtributeId from dbo.Lotr L
INNER JOIN dbo.LotrAttributes LA
ON L.LotrId = LA.LotrId;
LotrATtributeId
1
2
3
4
5
String Manipulation
A common one is to use FOR XML PATH('')
to replace string manipulations inside of cursors.
Dataset
CREATE TABLE dbo.Lotr(LotrId int, CharacterName varchar(255), Val varchar(255));
CREATE TABLE dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrATtributeId int, LotrId int, AttrVal varchar(255));
INSERT INTO dbo.Lotr(LotrId,CharacterName,Val)
VALUES(1,'Frodo','Ring');
INSERT INTO dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrId,LotrATtributeId,AttrVal)
VALUES(1,1,'RingAttribute1')
,(1,2,'RingAttribute2')
,(1,3,'RingAttribute3');
Double cursor with string manipulation
DECLARE @LotrId int, @CharacterName varchar(255), @Val varchar(255)
DECLARE @LotrATtributeId int, @AttrVal varchar(255)
DECLARE C CURSOR FOR
SELECT LotrId,CharacterName, Val FROM dbo.Lotr
OPEN C
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrId,@CharacterName,@Val
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @CharacterName +='|'+ @Val
DECLARE D CURSOR FOR
SELECT LotrATtributeId, AttrVal FROM dbo.LotrAttributes where LotrId = @LotrId
OPEN D
FETCH NEXT FROM D INTO @LotrATtributeId,@AttrVal
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @CharacterName +='['+@AttrVal+ '],'
FETCH NEXT FROM D INTO @LotrATtributeId,@AttrVal
END
CLOSE D
DEALLOCATE D
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrId,@CharacterName,@Val
END
CLOSE C
DEALLOCATE C
SELECT LEFT(@CharacterName,len(@charactername)-1);
Result
(No column name)
Frodo|Ring[RingAttribute1],[RingAttribute2],[RingAttribute3],
Removing the cursors with FOR XML PATH('')
SELECT L.Charactername +'|'+ L.Val + (SELECT stuff((SELECT ','+QUOTENAME(AttrVal) FROM dbo.LotrAttributes LA WHERE LA.LotrId = L.LotrId FOR XML PATH('')), 1, 1, ''))
FROM
dbo.Lotr L;
*
The real workaround here would be figuring out why the data is presented in this manner, and changing the application/... as to not need it in this format, storing it somewhere, ....
If your hands are tied, this would be the next best thing.
Insert top 10 values into a temp table based on Id's in another table
Data
CREATE TABLE dbo.sometable(InsertTableId int, val varchar(255));
CREATE TABLE dbo.Top10Table(Top10TableId int, InsertTableId int, val varchar(255));
INSERT INTO dbo.sometable(InsertTableId,val)
VALUES(1,'bla')
,(2,'blabla');
INSERT INTO dbo.Top10Table(Top10TableId,InsertTableId,Val)
VALUES(1,1,'WUW')
,(2,1,'WUW')
,(3,1,'WUW');
Cursor
CREATE TABLE #Top10Values(Top10TableId int, InsertTableId int, val varchar(255))
DECLARE @InsertTableId int;
DECLARE C CURSOR FOR select InsertTableId from dbo.sometable;
OPEN C
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @InsertTableId;
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS =0
BEGIN
INSERT INTO #Top10Values(Top10TableId,InsertTableId,val)
SELECT top(10) Top10TableId,InsertTableId,Val FROM dbo.Top10Table
where InsertTableId = @InsertTableId
ORDER BY Top10TableId
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @InsertTableId;
END
CLOSE C
DEALLOCATE C
SELECT * FROM #Top10Values;
DROP TABLE #Top10Values;
Result
Top10TableId InsertTableId val
1 1 WUW
2 1 WUW
3 1 WUW
Replacing the cursor with CROSS APPLY
and a CTE
CREATE TABLE #Top10Values(Top10TableId int, InsertTableId int, val varchar(255));
;WITH CTE
AS
(
select InsertTableId from dbo.sometable
)
INSERT INTO #Top10Values(Top10TableId,InsertTableId,val)
SELECT T1T.Top10TableId,T1T.InsertTableId,T1T.Val
FROM
CTE
CROSS APPLY (SELECT TOP (10) Top10TableId,InsertTableId,Val from dbo.Top10Table T1T
WHERE T1T.InsertTableId = CTE.InsertTableId
) T1T ;
SELECT * FROM #Top10Values;
DROP TABLE #Top10Values;
Other examples
- An example on replacing a cursor to select a dynamic set of items per
Supplier by usingCROSS APPLY
here. - An example on using windowing functions to replace a cursor here.
Sometimes there is no other choice
If you cannot work in sets, and have to do row by row processing, you could still optimize the cursor.
One of the biggest changes in speeding up the cursor is by adding LOCAL FAST_FORWARD
to it.
DECLARE C CURSOR LOCAL FAST_FORWARD FOR SELECT LotrId from dbo.Lotr
Take a look at this blogpost by @AaronBertrand where he explains the possible differences in performance when using or not using cursor settings like LOCAL
& FAST_FORWARD
.
add a comment |
It depends™
The ability to work around one or multiple cursors, will depend on what is going to be executed inside of this cursor. Without knowing what is going on in it, there is no way to tell. It could be that there is no workaround, and you have to do row by row processing.
Below are a some examples.
Not working in sets
This example is the most basic one, and is simply the fact that you could query your entire dataset or parts of your dataset at once, but the cursor was created and is querying the data row by row. Common ones to replace this with are JOIN
's, CROSS APPLY
/ OUTER APPLY
and others.
Consider the following data set:
CREATE TABLE dbo.Lotr(LotrId int, CharacterName varchar(255), Val varchar(255));
CREATE TABLE dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrATtributeId int, LotrId int, AttrVal varchar(255));
INSERT INTO dbo.Lotr(LotrId,CharacterName,Val)
VALUES(1,'Frodo','Ring')
,(2,'Gandalf','Staff');
INSERT INTO dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrId,LotrATtributeId,AttrVal)
VALUES(1,1,'RingAttribute1')
,(1,2,'RingAttribute2')
,(1,3,'RingAttribute3')
,(2,4,'StaffAttribute1')
,(2,5,'StaffAttribute2');
One could try and find each record and it matches separately, by looping over the Lotr
Table.
Cursor:
DECLARE @LotrID int
DECLARE C CURSOR FOR SELECT LotrId from dbo.Lotr;
OPEN C
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrID;
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SELECT LotrATtributeId from dbo.LotrAttributes where LotrId = @LotrID;
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrID;
END
CLOSE C
DEALLOCATE C
Resulting in two result sets
LotrATtributeId
1
2
3
LotrATtributeId
4
5
When this inner join
is used, we get the same result as one resultset.
SELECT LotrATtributeId from dbo.Lotr L
INNER JOIN dbo.LotrAttributes LA
ON L.LotrId = LA.LotrId;
LotrATtributeId
1
2
3
4
5
String Manipulation
A common one is to use FOR XML PATH('')
to replace string manipulations inside of cursors.
Dataset
CREATE TABLE dbo.Lotr(LotrId int, CharacterName varchar(255), Val varchar(255));
CREATE TABLE dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrATtributeId int, LotrId int, AttrVal varchar(255));
INSERT INTO dbo.Lotr(LotrId,CharacterName,Val)
VALUES(1,'Frodo','Ring');
INSERT INTO dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrId,LotrATtributeId,AttrVal)
VALUES(1,1,'RingAttribute1')
,(1,2,'RingAttribute2')
,(1,3,'RingAttribute3');
Double cursor with string manipulation
DECLARE @LotrId int, @CharacterName varchar(255), @Val varchar(255)
DECLARE @LotrATtributeId int, @AttrVal varchar(255)
DECLARE C CURSOR FOR
SELECT LotrId,CharacterName, Val FROM dbo.Lotr
OPEN C
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrId,@CharacterName,@Val
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @CharacterName +='|'+ @Val
DECLARE D CURSOR FOR
SELECT LotrATtributeId, AttrVal FROM dbo.LotrAttributes where LotrId = @LotrId
OPEN D
FETCH NEXT FROM D INTO @LotrATtributeId,@AttrVal
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @CharacterName +='['+@AttrVal+ '],'
FETCH NEXT FROM D INTO @LotrATtributeId,@AttrVal
END
CLOSE D
DEALLOCATE D
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrId,@CharacterName,@Val
END
CLOSE C
DEALLOCATE C
SELECT LEFT(@CharacterName,len(@charactername)-1);
Result
(No column name)
Frodo|Ring[RingAttribute1],[RingAttribute2],[RingAttribute3],
Removing the cursors with FOR XML PATH('')
SELECT L.Charactername +'|'+ L.Val + (SELECT stuff((SELECT ','+QUOTENAME(AttrVal) FROM dbo.LotrAttributes LA WHERE LA.LotrId = L.LotrId FOR XML PATH('')), 1, 1, ''))
FROM
dbo.Lotr L;
*
The real workaround here would be figuring out why the data is presented in this manner, and changing the application/... as to not need it in this format, storing it somewhere, ....
If your hands are tied, this would be the next best thing.
Insert top 10 values into a temp table based on Id's in another table
Data
CREATE TABLE dbo.sometable(InsertTableId int, val varchar(255));
CREATE TABLE dbo.Top10Table(Top10TableId int, InsertTableId int, val varchar(255));
INSERT INTO dbo.sometable(InsertTableId,val)
VALUES(1,'bla')
,(2,'blabla');
INSERT INTO dbo.Top10Table(Top10TableId,InsertTableId,Val)
VALUES(1,1,'WUW')
,(2,1,'WUW')
,(3,1,'WUW');
Cursor
CREATE TABLE #Top10Values(Top10TableId int, InsertTableId int, val varchar(255))
DECLARE @InsertTableId int;
DECLARE C CURSOR FOR select InsertTableId from dbo.sometable;
OPEN C
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @InsertTableId;
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS =0
BEGIN
INSERT INTO #Top10Values(Top10TableId,InsertTableId,val)
SELECT top(10) Top10TableId,InsertTableId,Val FROM dbo.Top10Table
where InsertTableId = @InsertTableId
ORDER BY Top10TableId
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @InsertTableId;
END
CLOSE C
DEALLOCATE C
SELECT * FROM #Top10Values;
DROP TABLE #Top10Values;
Result
Top10TableId InsertTableId val
1 1 WUW
2 1 WUW
3 1 WUW
Replacing the cursor with CROSS APPLY
and a CTE
CREATE TABLE #Top10Values(Top10TableId int, InsertTableId int, val varchar(255));
;WITH CTE
AS
(
select InsertTableId from dbo.sometable
)
INSERT INTO #Top10Values(Top10TableId,InsertTableId,val)
SELECT T1T.Top10TableId,T1T.InsertTableId,T1T.Val
FROM
CTE
CROSS APPLY (SELECT TOP (10) Top10TableId,InsertTableId,Val from dbo.Top10Table T1T
WHERE T1T.InsertTableId = CTE.InsertTableId
) T1T ;
SELECT * FROM #Top10Values;
DROP TABLE #Top10Values;
Other examples
- An example on replacing a cursor to select a dynamic set of items per
Supplier by usingCROSS APPLY
here. - An example on using windowing functions to replace a cursor here.
Sometimes there is no other choice
If you cannot work in sets, and have to do row by row processing, you could still optimize the cursor.
One of the biggest changes in speeding up the cursor is by adding LOCAL FAST_FORWARD
to it.
DECLARE C CURSOR LOCAL FAST_FORWARD FOR SELECT LotrId from dbo.Lotr
Take a look at this blogpost by @AaronBertrand where he explains the possible differences in performance when using or not using cursor settings like LOCAL
& FAST_FORWARD
.
add a comment |
It depends™
The ability to work around one or multiple cursors, will depend on what is going to be executed inside of this cursor. Without knowing what is going on in it, there is no way to tell. It could be that there is no workaround, and you have to do row by row processing.
Below are a some examples.
Not working in sets
This example is the most basic one, and is simply the fact that you could query your entire dataset or parts of your dataset at once, but the cursor was created and is querying the data row by row. Common ones to replace this with are JOIN
's, CROSS APPLY
/ OUTER APPLY
and others.
Consider the following data set:
CREATE TABLE dbo.Lotr(LotrId int, CharacterName varchar(255), Val varchar(255));
CREATE TABLE dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrATtributeId int, LotrId int, AttrVal varchar(255));
INSERT INTO dbo.Lotr(LotrId,CharacterName,Val)
VALUES(1,'Frodo','Ring')
,(2,'Gandalf','Staff');
INSERT INTO dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrId,LotrATtributeId,AttrVal)
VALUES(1,1,'RingAttribute1')
,(1,2,'RingAttribute2')
,(1,3,'RingAttribute3')
,(2,4,'StaffAttribute1')
,(2,5,'StaffAttribute2');
One could try and find each record and it matches separately, by looping over the Lotr
Table.
Cursor:
DECLARE @LotrID int
DECLARE C CURSOR FOR SELECT LotrId from dbo.Lotr;
OPEN C
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrID;
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SELECT LotrATtributeId from dbo.LotrAttributes where LotrId = @LotrID;
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrID;
END
CLOSE C
DEALLOCATE C
Resulting in two result sets
LotrATtributeId
1
2
3
LotrATtributeId
4
5
When this inner join
is used, we get the same result as one resultset.
SELECT LotrATtributeId from dbo.Lotr L
INNER JOIN dbo.LotrAttributes LA
ON L.LotrId = LA.LotrId;
LotrATtributeId
1
2
3
4
5
String Manipulation
A common one is to use FOR XML PATH('')
to replace string manipulations inside of cursors.
Dataset
CREATE TABLE dbo.Lotr(LotrId int, CharacterName varchar(255), Val varchar(255));
CREATE TABLE dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrATtributeId int, LotrId int, AttrVal varchar(255));
INSERT INTO dbo.Lotr(LotrId,CharacterName,Val)
VALUES(1,'Frodo','Ring');
INSERT INTO dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrId,LotrATtributeId,AttrVal)
VALUES(1,1,'RingAttribute1')
,(1,2,'RingAttribute2')
,(1,3,'RingAttribute3');
Double cursor with string manipulation
DECLARE @LotrId int, @CharacterName varchar(255), @Val varchar(255)
DECLARE @LotrATtributeId int, @AttrVal varchar(255)
DECLARE C CURSOR FOR
SELECT LotrId,CharacterName, Val FROM dbo.Lotr
OPEN C
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrId,@CharacterName,@Val
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @CharacterName +='|'+ @Val
DECLARE D CURSOR FOR
SELECT LotrATtributeId, AttrVal FROM dbo.LotrAttributes where LotrId = @LotrId
OPEN D
FETCH NEXT FROM D INTO @LotrATtributeId,@AttrVal
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @CharacterName +='['+@AttrVal+ '],'
FETCH NEXT FROM D INTO @LotrATtributeId,@AttrVal
END
CLOSE D
DEALLOCATE D
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrId,@CharacterName,@Val
END
CLOSE C
DEALLOCATE C
SELECT LEFT(@CharacterName,len(@charactername)-1);
Result
(No column name)
Frodo|Ring[RingAttribute1],[RingAttribute2],[RingAttribute3],
Removing the cursors with FOR XML PATH('')
SELECT L.Charactername +'|'+ L.Val + (SELECT stuff((SELECT ','+QUOTENAME(AttrVal) FROM dbo.LotrAttributes LA WHERE LA.LotrId = L.LotrId FOR XML PATH('')), 1, 1, ''))
FROM
dbo.Lotr L;
*
The real workaround here would be figuring out why the data is presented in this manner, and changing the application/... as to not need it in this format, storing it somewhere, ....
If your hands are tied, this would be the next best thing.
Insert top 10 values into a temp table based on Id's in another table
Data
CREATE TABLE dbo.sometable(InsertTableId int, val varchar(255));
CREATE TABLE dbo.Top10Table(Top10TableId int, InsertTableId int, val varchar(255));
INSERT INTO dbo.sometable(InsertTableId,val)
VALUES(1,'bla')
,(2,'blabla');
INSERT INTO dbo.Top10Table(Top10TableId,InsertTableId,Val)
VALUES(1,1,'WUW')
,(2,1,'WUW')
,(3,1,'WUW');
Cursor
CREATE TABLE #Top10Values(Top10TableId int, InsertTableId int, val varchar(255))
DECLARE @InsertTableId int;
DECLARE C CURSOR FOR select InsertTableId from dbo.sometable;
OPEN C
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @InsertTableId;
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS =0
BEGIN
INSERT INTO #Top10Values(Top10TableId,InsertTableId,val)
SELECT top(10) Top10TableId,InsertTableId,Val FROM dbo.Top10Table
where InsertTableId = @InsertTableId
ORDER BY Top10TableId
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @InsertTableId;
END
CLOSE C
DEALLOCATE C
SELECT * FROM #Top10Values;
DROP TABLE #Top10Values;
Result
Top10TableId InsertTableId val
1 1 WUW
2 1 WUW
3 1 WUW
Replacing the cursor with CROSS APPLY
and a CTE
CREATE TABLE #Top10Values(Top10TableId int, InsertTableId int, val varchar(255));
;WITH CTE
AS
(
select InsertTableId from dbo.sometable
)
INSERT INTO #Top10Values(Top10TableId,InsertTableId,val)
SELECT T1T.Top10TableId,T1T.InsertTableId,T1T.Val
FROM
CTE
CROSS APPLY (SELECT TOP (10) Top10TableId,InsertTableId,Val from dbo.Top10Table T1T
WHERE T1T.InsertTableId = CTE.InsertTableId
) T1T ;
SELECT * FROM #Top10Values;
DROP TABLE #Top10Values;
Other examples
- An example on replacing a cursor to select a dynamic set of items per
Supplier by usingCROSS APPLY
here. - An example on using windowing functions to replace a cursor here.
Sometimes there is no other choice
If you cannot work in sets, and have to do row by row processing, you could still optimize the cursor.
One of the biggest changes in speeding up the cursor is by adding LOCAL FAST_FORWARD
to it.
DECLARE C CURSOR LOCAL FAST_FORWARD FOR SELECT LotrId from dbo.Lotr
Take a look at this blogpost by @AaronBertrand where he explains the possible differences in performance when using or not using cursor settings like LOCAL
& FAST_FORWARD
.
It depends™
The ability to work around one or multiple cursors, will depend on what is going to be executed inside of this cursor. Without knowing what is going on in it, there is no way to tell. It could be that there is no workaround, and you have to do row by row processing.
Below are a some examples.
Not working in sets
This example is the most basic one, and is simply the fact that you could query your entire dataset or parts of your dataset at once, but the cursor was created and is querying the data row by row. Common ones to replace this with are JOIN
's, CROSS APPLY
/ OUTER APPLY
and others.
Consider the following data set:
CREATE TABLE dbo.Lotr(LotrId int, CharacterName varchar(255), Val varchar(255));
CREATE TABLE dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrATtributeId int, LotrId int, AttrVal varchar(255));
INSERT INTO dbo.Lotr(LotrId,CharacterName,Val)
VALUES(1,'Frodo','Ring')
,(2,'Gandalf','Staff');
INSERT INTO dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrId,LotrATtributeId,AttrVal)
VALUES(1,1,'RingAttribute1')
,(1,2,'RingAttribute2')
,(1,3,'RingAttribute3')
,(2,4,'StaffAttribute1')
,(2,5,'StaffAttribute2');
One could try and find each record and it matches separately, by looping over the Lotr
Table.
Cursor:
DECLARE @LotrID int
DECLARE C CURSOR FOR SELECT LotrId from dbo.Lotr;
OPEN C
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrID;
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SELECT LotrATtributeId from dbo.LotrAttributes where LotrId = @LotrID;
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrID;
END
CLOSE C
DEALLOCATE C
Resulting in two result sets
LotrATtributeId
1
2
3
LotrATtributeId
4
5
When this inner join
is used, we get the same result as one resultset.
SELECT LotrATtributeId from dbo.Lotr L
INNER JOIN dbo.LotrAttributes LA
ON L.LotrId = LA.LotrId;
LotrATtributeId
1
2
3
4
5
String Manipulation
A common one is to use FOR XML PATH('')
to replace string manipulations inside of cursors.
Dataset
CREATE TABLE dbo.Lotr(LotrId int, CharacterName varchar(255), Val varchar(255));
CREATE TABLE dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrATtributeId int, LotrId int, AttrVal varchar(255));
INSERT INTO dbo.Lotr(LotrId,CharacterName,Val)
VALUES(1,'Frodo','Ring');
INSERT INTO dbo.LotrAttributes(LotrId,LotrATtributeId,AttrVal)
VALUES(1,1,'RingAttribute1')
,(1,2,'RingAttribute2')
,(1,3,'RingAttribute3');
Double cursor with string manipulation
DECLARE @LotrId int, @CharacterName varchar(255), @Val varchar(255)
DECLARE @LotrATtributeId int, @AttrVal varchar(255)
DECLARE C CURSOR FOR
SELECT LotrId,CharacterName, Val FROM dbo.Lotr
OPEN C
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrId,@CharacterName,@Val
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @CharacterName +='|'+ @Val
DECLARE D CURSOR FOR
SELECT LotrATtributeId, AttrVal FROM dbo.LotrAttributes where LotrId = @LotrId
OPEN D
FETCH NEXT FROM D INTO @LotrATtributeId,@AttrVal
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @CharacterName +='['+@AttrVal+ '],'
FETCH NEXT FROM D INTO @LotrATtributeId,@AttrVal
END
CLOSE D
DEALLOCATE D
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @LotrId,@CharacterName,@Val
END
CLOSE C
DEALLOCATE C
SELECT LEFT(@CharacterName,len(@charactername)-1);
Result
(No column name)
Frodo|Ring[RingAttribute1],[RingAttribute2],[RingAttribute3],
Removing the cursors with FOR XML PATH('')
SELECT L.Charactername +'|'+ L.Val + (SELECT stuff((SELECT ','+QUOTENAME(AttrVal) FROM dbo.LotrAttributes LA WHERE LA.LotrId = L.LotrId FOR XML PATH('')), 1, 1, ''))
FROM
dbo.Lotr L;
*
The real workaround here would be figuring out why the data is presented in this manner, and changing the application/... as to not need it in this format, storing it somewhere, ....
If your hands are tied, this would be the next best thing.
Insert top 10 values into a temp table based on Id's in another table
Data
CREATE TABLE dbo.sometable(InsertTableId int, val varchar(255));
CREATE TABLE dbo.Top10Table(Top10TableId int, InsertTableId int, val varchar(255));
INSERT INTO dbo.sometable(InsertTableId,val)
VALUES(1,'bla')
,(2,'blabla');
INSERT INTO dbo.Top10Table(Top10TableId,InsertTableId,Val)
VALUES(1,1,'WUW')
,(2,1,'WUW')
,(3,1,'WUW');
Cursor
CREATE TABLE #Top10Values(Top10TableId int, InsertTableId int, val varchar(255))
DECLARE @InsertTableId int;
DECLARE C CURSOR FOR select InsertTableId from dbo.sometable;
OPEN C
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @InsertTableId;
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS =0
BEGIN
INSERT INTO #Top10Values(Top10TableId,InsertTableId,val)
SELECT top(10) Top10TableId,InsertTableId,Val FROM dbo.Top10Table
where InsertTableId = @InsertTableId
ORDER BY Top10TableId
FETCH NEXT FROM C INTO @InsertTableId;
END
CLOSE C
DEALLOCATE C
SELECT * FROM #Top10Values;
DROP TABLE #Top10Values;
Result
Top10TableId InsertTableId val
1 1 WUW
2 1 WUW
3 1 WUW
Replacing the cursor with CROSS APPLY
and a CTE
CREATE TABLE #Top10Values(Top10TableId int, InsertTableId int, val varchar(255));
;WITH CTE
AS
(
select InsertTableId from dbo.sometable
)
INSERT INTO #Top10Values(Top10TableId,InsertTableId,val)
SELECT T1T.Top10TableId,T1T.InsertTableId,T1T.Val
FROM
CTE
CROSS APPLY (SELECT TOP (10) Top10TableId,InsertTableId,Val from dbo.Top10Table T1T
WHERE T1T.InsertTableId = CTE.InsertTableId
) T1T ;
SELECT * FROM #Top10Values;
DROP TABLE #Top10Values;
Other examples
- An example on replacing a cursor to select a dynamic set of items per
Supplier by usingCROSS APPLY
here. - An example on using windowing functions to replace a cursor here.
Sometimes there is no other choice
If you cannot work in sets, and have to do row by row processing, you could still optimize the cursor.
One of the biggest changes in speeding up the cursor is by adding LOCAL FAST_FORWARD
to it.
DECLARE C CURSOR LOCAL FAST_FORWARD FOR SELECT LotrId from dbo.Lotr
Take a look at this blogpost by @AaronBertrand where he explains the possible differences in performance when using or not using cursor settings like LOCAL
& FAST_FORWARD
.
edited 4 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
Randi VertongenRandi Vertongen
4,396924
4,396924
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f233884%2fcursor-replacement-for-newbies%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown