Attempt at sequence proof $frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}$ converges to $0$
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Prove convergence of the following sequence: $$frac{n+3}{n^2 -3} rightarrow 0$$
Proof discussion:
Notice that since whenever $n>3$, we have $n^2 -3 >0$, we also know that $n+3 >0$, so $frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}>0$. This means we can drop the absolute value signs in:
$$ left|frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}-0right|=frac{n+3}{n^2 -3} $$
We now notice that for $n>3$ also $n^2 -9>0$ and $n^2 -3 > n^2 -9$ so $frac{1}{n^2 -3}< frac{1}{n^2 -9}$ we can thus write:
$$frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}<frac{n+3}{n^2 -9}=frac{(n+3)}{(n+3)(n-3)}=frac{1}{n-3} $$
To be able to complete this proof we want that $frac{1}{n-3}<epsilon$, we write $n-3>frac{1}{epsilon}$ or $n> frac{1}{epsilon} +3$. If we pick $n_0 =lceilfrac{1}{epsilon} +3rceil$, it will also be automatically larger than $3$. We can now write our proof:
Proof:
For all $epsilon>0$, we let $n_0=lceil{frac{1}{epsilon}+3 }rceil$ then for all $n>n_0$, we know that:
$$|a_n-0|=left|frac{n+3}{n^2-3} right|<frac{n+3}{n^2-9}=frac{1}{n-3}< frac{1}{frac{1}{epsilon}+3-3}=epsilon$$
And hence our sequence converges to $0$ $square$.
Is my proof okay?
real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-verification epsilon-delta
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Prove convergence of the following sequence: $$frac{n+3}{n^2 -3} rightarrow 0$$
Proof discussion:
Notice that since whenever $n>3$, we have $n^2 -3 >0$, we also know that $n+3 >0$, so $frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}>0$. This means we can drop the absolute value signs in:
$$ left|frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}-0right|=frac{n+3}{n^2 -3} $$
We now notice that for $n>3$ also $n^2 -9>0$ and $n^2 -3 > n^2 -9$ so $frac{1}{n^2 -3}< frac{1}{n^2 -9}$ we can thus write:
$$frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}<frac{n+3}{n^2 -9}=frac{(n+3)}{(n+3)(n-3)}=frac{1}{n-3} $$
To be able to complete this proof we want that $frac{1}{n-3}<epsilon$, we write $n-3>frac{1}{epsilon}$ or $n> frac{1}{epsilon} +3$. If we pick $n_0 =lceilfrac{1}{epsilon} +3rceil$, it will also be automatically larger than $3$. We can now write our proof:
Proof:
For all $epsilon>0$, we let $n_0=lceil{frac{1}{epsilon}+3 }rceil$ then for all $n>n_0$, we know that:
$$|a_n-0|=left|frac{n+3}{n^2-3} right|<frac{n+3}{n^2-9}=frac{1}{n-3}< frac{1}{frac{1}{epsilon}+3-3}=epsilon$$
And hence our sequence converges to $0$ $square$.
Is my proof okay?
real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-verification epsilon-delta
1
I think you should make explicit that since $epsilon>0$, then $n_0geq 4$, so the denominator in $leftlvertfrac{n+3}{n^2-3}rightrvert$ is positive, so you can remove the absolute value sign. Otherwise, I think the proof is perfect.
– YiFan
yesterday
1
Yes, perfect! Just another small mistake: twice you wrote $epsilon$ instead of $1/epsilon$. I guess it was just a type since you continued correctly.
– maxmilgram
yesterday
I do make the case that the denominator is positive, It's in the first line.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
Maybe I should say it explicitly.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Prove convergence of the following sequence: $$frac{n+3}{n^2 -3} rightarrow 0$$
Proof discussion:
Notice that since whenever $n>3$, we have $n^2 -3 >0$, we also know that $n+3 >0$, so $frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}>0$. This means we can drop the absolute value signs in:
$$ left|frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}-0right|=frac{n+3}{n^2 -3} $$
We now notice that for $n>3$ also $n^2 -9>0$ and $n^2 -3 > n^2 -9$ so $frac{1}{n^2 -3}< frac{1}{n^2 -9}$ we can thus write:
$$frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}<frac{n+3}{n^2 -9}=frac{(n+3)}{(n+3)(n-3)}=frac{1}{n-3} $$
To be able to complete this proof we want that $frac{1}{n-3}<epsilon$, we write $n-3>frac{1}{epsilon}$ or $n> frac{1}{epsilon} +3$. If we pick $n_0 =lceilfrac{1}{epsilon} +3rceil$, it will also be automatically larger than $3$. We can now write our proof:
Proof:
For all $epsilon>0$, we let $n_0=lceil{frac{1}{epsilon}+3 }rceil$ then for all $n>n_0$, we know that:
$$|a_n-0|=left|frac{n+3}{n^2-3} right|<frac{n+3}{n^2-9}=frac{1}{n-3}< frac{1}{frac{1}{epsilon}+3-3}=epsilon$$
And hence our sequence converges to $0$ $square$.
Is my proof okay?
real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-verification epsilon-delta
Prove convergence of the following sequence: $$frac{n+3}{n^2 -3} rightarrow 0$$
Proof discussion:
Notice that since whenever $n>3$, we have $n^2 -3 >0$, we also know that $n+3 >0$, so $frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}>0$. This means we can drop the absolute value signs in:
$$ left|frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}-0right|=frac{n+3}{n^2 -3} $$
We now notice that for $n>3$ also $n^2 -9>0$ and $n^2 -3 > n^2 -9$ so $frac{1}{n^2 -3}< frac{1}{n^2 -9}$ we can thus write:
$$frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}<frac{n+3}{n^2 -9}=frac{(n+3)}{(n+3)(n-3)}=frac{1}{n-3} $$
To be able to complete this proof we want that $frac{1}{n-3}<epsilon$, we write $n-3>frac{1}{epsilon}$ or $n> frac{1}{epsilon} +3$. If we pick $n_0 =lceilfrac{1}{epsilon} +3rceil$, it will also be automatically larger than $3$. We can now write our proof:
Proof:
For all $epsilon>0$, we let $n_0=lceil{frac{1}{epsilon}+3 }rceil$ then for all $n>n_0$, we know that:
$$|a_n-0|=left|frac{n+3}{n^2-3} right|<frac{n+3}{n^2-9}=frac{1}{n-3}< frac{1}{frac{1}{epsilon}+3-3}=epsilon$$
And hence our sequence converges to $0$ $square$.
Is my proof okay?
real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-verification epsilon-delta
real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-verification epsilon-delta
edited yesterday
asked yesterday
WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
773217
773217
1
I think you should make explicit that since $epsilon>0$, then $n_0geq 4$, so the denominator in $leftlvertfrac{n+3}{n^2-3}rightrvert$ is positive, so you can remove the absolute value sign. Otherwise, I think the proof is perfect.
– YiFan
yesterday
1
Yes, perfect! Just another small mistake: twice you wrote $epsilon$ instead of $1/epsilon$. I guess it was just a type since you continued correctly.
– maxmilgram
yesterday
I do make the case that the denominator is positive, It's in the first line.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
Maybe I should say it explicitly.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
add a comment |
1
I think you should make explicit that since $epsilon>0$, then $n_0geq 4$, so the denominator in $leftlvertfrac{n+3}{n^2-3}rightrvert$ is positive, so you can remove the absolute value sign. Otherwise, I think the proof is perfect.
– YiFan
yesterday
1
Yes, perfect! Just another small mistake: twice you wrote $epsilon$ instead of $1/epsilon$. I guess it was just a type since you continued correctly.
– maxmilgram
yesterday
I do make the case that the denominator is positive, It's in the first line.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
Maybe I should say it explicitly.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
1
1
I think you should make explicit that since $epsilon>0$, then $n_0geq 4$, so the denominator in $leftlvertfrac{n+3}{n^2-3}rightrvert$ is positive, so you can remove the absolute value sign. Otherwise, I think the proof is perfect.
– YiFan
yesterday
I think you should make explicit that since $epsilon>0$, then $n_0geq 4$, so the denominator in $leftlvertfrac{n+3}{n^2-3}rightrvert$ is positive, so you can remove the absolute value sign. Otherwise, I think the proof is perfect.
– YiFan
yesterday
1
1
Yes, perfect! Just another small mistake: twice you wrote $epsilon$ instead of $1/epsilon$. I guess it was just a type since you continued correctly.
– maxmilgram
yesterday
Yes, perfect! Just another small mistake: twice you wrote $epsilon$ instead of $1/epsilon$. I guess it was just a type since you continued correctly.
– maxmilgram
yesterday
I do make the case that the denominator is positive, It's in the first line.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
I do make the case that the denominator is positive, It's in the first line.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
Maybe I should say it explicitly.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
Maybe I should say it explicitly.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yup, the proof is correct.
Also, "we write $n-3>color{blue}{frac1{epsilon}}$"
Why is this an inequality and not an equality? we can just cancel the $n+3$ right?
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
1
oops, you are right. I made a mistake.
– Siong Thye Goh
yesterday
Thank you. I did do a typo :) you were right about that
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
1
huzzah! I've done it :D
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Alternatively, decompose
$$frac{n+3}{n^2-3}=frac1{n-sqrt3}+(3-sqrt3)frac1{n^2-3}$$
and the two terms are of the form $dfrac1infty$.
That could work later on in the course, right now I am not yet allowed to use this.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
I realised this is okay since sequences map to $mathbb{R}$, so you can write it in this manner.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
@WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo: isn't $epsilon$ in $mathbb R$ ?
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
Yes, of course :)
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yup, the proof is correct.
Also, "we write $n-3>color{blue}{frac1{epsilon}}$"
Why is this an inequality and not an equality? we can just cancel the $n+3$ right?
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
1
oops, you are right. I made a mistake.
– Siong Thye Goh
yesterday
Thank you. I did do a typo :) you were right about that
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
1
huzzah! I've done it :D
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yup, the proof is correct.
Also, "we write $n-3>color{blue}{frac1{epsilon}}$"
Why is this an inequality and not an equality? we can just cancel the $n+3$ right?
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
1
oops, you are right. I made a mistake.
– Siong Thye Goh
yesterday
Thank you. I did do a typo :) you were right about that
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
1
huzzah! I've done it :D
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yup, the proof is correct.
Also, "we write $n-3>color{blue}{frac1{epsilon}}$"
Yup, the proof is correct.
Also, "we write $n-3>color{blue}{frac1{epsilon}}$"
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Siong Thye Goh
92.6k1462114
92.6k1462114
Why is this an inequality and not an equality? we can just cancel the $n+3$ right?
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
1
oops, you are right. I made a mistake.
– Siong Thye Goh
yesterday
Thank you. I did do a typo :) you were right about that
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
1
huzzah! I've done it :D
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
add a comment |
Why is this an inequality and not an equality? we can just cancel the $n+3$ right?
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
1
oops, you are right. I made a mistake.
– Siong Thye Goh
yesterday
Thank you. I did do a typo :) you were right about that
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
1
huzzah! I've done it :D
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
Why is this an inequality and not an equality? we can just cancel the $n+3$ right?
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
Why is this an inequality and not an equality? we can just cancel the $n+3$ right?
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
1
1
oops, you are right. I made a mistake.
– Siong Thye Goh
yesterday
oops, you are right. I made a mistake.
– Siong Thye Goh
yesterday
Thank you. I did do a typo :) you were right about that
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
Thank you. I did do a typo :) you were right about that
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
1
1
huzzah! I've done it :D
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
huzzah! I've done it :D
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Alternatively, decompose
$$frac{n+3}{n^2-3}=frac1{n-sqrt3}+(3-sqrt3)frac1{n^2-3}$$
and the two terms are of the form $dfrac1infty$.
That could work later on in the course, right now I am not yet allowed to use this.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
I realised this is okay since sequences map to $mathbb{R}$, so you can write it in this manner.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
@WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo: isn't $epsilon$ in $mathbb R$ ?
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
Yes, of course :)
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Alternatively, decompose
$$frac{n+3}{n^2-3}=frac1{n-sqrt3}+(3-sqrt3)frac1{n^2-3}$$
and the two terms are of the form $dfrac1infty$.
That could work later on in the course, right now I am not yet allowed to use this.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
I realised this is okay since sequences map to $mathbb{R}$, so you can write it in this manner.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
@WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo: isn't $epsilon$ in $mathbb R$ ?
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
Yes, of course :)
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Alternatively, decompose
$$frac{n+3}{n^2-3}=frac1{n-sqrt3}+(3-sqrt3)frac1{n^2-3}$$
and the two terms are of the form $dfrac1infty$.
Alternatively, decompose
$$frac{n+3}{n^2-3}=frac1{n-sqrt3}+(3-sqrt3)frac1{n^2-3}$$
and the two terms are of the form $dfrac1infty$.
answered yesterday
Yves Daoust
121k668217
121k668217
That could work later on in the course, right now I am not yet allowed to use this.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
I realised this is okay since sequences map to $mathbb{R}$, so you can write it in this manner.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
@WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo: isn't $epsilon$ in $mathbb R$ ?
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
Yes, of course :)
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
add a comment |
That could work later on in the course, right now I am not yet allowed to use this.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
I realised this is okay since sequences map to $mathbb{R}$, so you can write it in this manner.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
@WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo: isn't $epsilon$ in $mathbb R$ ?
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
Yes, of course :)
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
That could work later on in the course, right now I am not yet allowed to use this.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
That could work later on in the course, right now I am not yet allowed to use this.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
I realised this is okay since sequences map to $mathbb{R}$, so you can write it in this manner.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
I realised this is okay since sequences map to $mathbb{R}$, so you can write it in this manner.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
@WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo: isn't $epsilon$ in $mathbb R$ ?
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
@WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo: isn't $epsilon$ in $mathbb R$ ?
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
Yes, of course :)
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
Yes, of course :)
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000830%2fattempt-at-sequence-proof-fracn3n2-3-converges-to-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I think you should make explicit that since $epsilon>0$, then $n_0geq 4$, so the denominator in $leftlvertfrac{n+3}{n^2-3}rightrvert$ is positive, so you can remove the absolute value sign. Otherwise, I think the proof is perfect.
– YiFan
yesterday
1
Yes, perfect! Just another small mistake: twice you wrote $epsilon$ instead of $1/epsilon$. I guess it was just a type since you continued correctly.
– maxmilgram
yesterday
I do make the case that the denominator is positive, It's in the first line.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday
Maybe I should say it explicitly.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday