Attempt at sequence proof $frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}$ converges to $0$











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1













Prove convergence of the following sequence: $$frac{n+3}{n^2 -3} rightarrow 0$$




Proof discussion:



Notice that since whenever $n>3$, we have $n^2 -3 >0$, we also know that $n+3 >0$, so $frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}>0$. This means we can drop the absolute value signs in:
$$ left|frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}-0right|=frac{n+3}{n^2 -3} $$
We now notice that for $n>3$ also $n^2 -9>0$ and $n^2 -3 > n^2 -9$ so $frac{1}{n^2 -3}< frac{1}{n^2 -9}$ we can thus write:
$$frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}<frac{n+3}{n^2 -9}=frac{(n+3)}{(n+3)(n-3)}=frac{1}{n-3} $$



To be able to complete this proof we want that $frac{1}{n-3}<epsilon$, we write $n-3>frac{1}{epsilon}$ or $n> frac{1}{epsilon} +3$. If we pick $n_0 =lceilfrac{1}{epsilon} +3rceil$, it will also be automatically larger than $3$. We can now write our proof:



Proof:
For all $epsilon>0$, we let $n_0=lceil{frac{1}{epsilon}+3 }rceil$ then for all $n>n_0$, we know that:



$$|a_n-0|=left|frac{n+3}{n^2-3} right|<frac{n+3}{n^2-9}=frac{1}{n-3}< frac{1}{frac{1}{epsilon}+3-3}=epsilon$$
And hence our sequence converges to $0$ $square$.



Is my proof okay?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    I think you should make explicit that since $epsilon>0$, then $n_0geq 4$, so the denominator in $leftlvertfrac{n+3}{n^2-3}rightrvert$ is positive, so you can remove the absolute value sign. Otherwise, I think the proof is perfect.
    – YiFan
    yesterday






  • 1




    Yes, perfect! Just another small mistake: twice you wrote $epsilon$ instead of $1/epsilon$. I guess it was just a type since you continued correctly.
    – maxmilgram
    yesterday










  • I do make the case that the denominator is positive, It's in the first line.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday










  • Maybe I should say it explicitly.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday















up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1













Prove convergence of the following sequence: $$frac{n+3}{n^2 -3} rightarrow 0$$




Proof discussion:



Notice that since whenever $n>3$, we have $n^2 -3 >0$, we also know that $n+3 >0$, so $frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}>0$. This means we can drop the absolute value signs in:
$$ left|frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}-0right|=frac{n+3}{n^2 -3} $$
We now notice that for $n>3$ also $n^2 -9>0$ and $n^2 -3 > n^2 -9$ so $frac{1}{n^2 -3}< frac{1}{n^2 -9}$ we can thus write:
$$frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}<frac{n+3}{n^2 -9}=frac{(n+3)}{(n+3)(n-3)}=frac{1}{n-3} $$



To be able to complete this proof we want that $frac{1}{n-3}<epsilon$, we write $n-3>frac{1}{epsilon}$ or $n> frac{1}{epsilon} +3$. If we pick $n_0 =lceilfrac{1}{epsilon} +3rceil$, it will also be automatically larger than $3$. We can now write our proof:



Proof:
For all $epsilon>0$, we let $n_0=lceil{frac{1}{epsilon}+3 }rceil$ then for all $n>n_0$, we know that:



$$|a_n-0|=left|frac{n+3}{n^2-3} right|<frac{n+3}{n^2-9}=frac{1}{n-3}< frac{1}{frac{1}{epsilon}+3-3}=epsilon$$
And hence our sequence converges to $0$ $square$.



Is my proof okay?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    I think you should make explicit that since $epsilon>0$, then $n_0geq 4$, so the denominator in $leftlvertfrac{n+3}{n^2-3}rightrvert$ is positive, so you can remove the absolute value sign. Otherwise, I think the proof is perfect.
    – YiFan
    yesterday






  • 1




    Yes, perfect! Just another small mistake: twice you wrote $epsilon$ instead of $1/epsilon$. I guess it was just a type since you continued correctly.
    – maxmilgram
    yesterday










  • I do make the case that the denominator is positive, It's in the first line.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday










  • Maybe I should say it explicitly.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday













up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1






1






Prove convergence of the following sequence: $$frac{n+3}{n^2 -3} rightarrow 0$$




Proof discussion:



Notice that since whenever $n>3$, we have $n^2 -3 >0$, we also know that $n+3 >0$, so $frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}>0$. This means we can drop the absolute value signs in:
$$ left|frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}-0right|=frac{n+3}{n^2 -3} $$
We now notice that for $n>3$ also $n^2 -9>0$ and $n^2 -3 > n^2 -9$ so $frac{1}{n^2 -3}< frac{1}{n^2 -9}$ we can thus write:
$$frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}<frac{n+3}{n^2 -9}=frac{(n+3)}{(n+3)(n-3)}=frac{1}{n-3} $$



To be able to complete this proof we want that $frac{1}{n-3}<epsilon$, we write $n-3>frac{1}{epsilon}$ or $n> frac{1}{epsilon} +3$. If we pick $n_0 =lceilfrac{1}{epsilon} +3rceil$, it will also be automatically larger than $3$. We can now write our proof:



Proof:
For all $epsilon>0$, we let $n_0=lceil{frac{1}{epsilon}+3 }rceil$ then for all $n>n_0$, we know that:



$$|a_n-0|=left|frac{n+3}{n^2-3} right|<frac{n+3}{n^2-9}=frac{1}{n-3}< frac{1}{frac{1}{epsilon}+3-3}=epsilon$$
And hence our sequence converges to $0$ $square$.



Is my proof okay?










share|cite|improve this question
















Prove convergence of the following sequence: $$frac{n+3}{n^2 -3} rightarrow 0$$




Proof discussion:



Notice that since whenever $n>3$, we have $n^2 -3 >0$, we also know that $n+3 >0$, so $frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}>0$. This means we can drop the absolute value signs in:
$$ left|frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}-0right|=frac{n+3}{n^2 -3} $$
We now notice that for $n>3$ also $n^2 -9>0$ and $n^2 -3 > n^2 -9$ so $frac{1}{n^2 -3}< frac{1}{n^2 -9}$ we can thus write:
$$frac{n+3}{n^2 -3}<frac{n+3}{n^2 -9}=frac{(n+3)}{(n+3)(n-3)}=frac{1}{n-3} $$



To be able to complete this proof we want that $frac{1}{n-3}<epsilon$, we write $n-3>frac{1}{epsilon}$ or $n> frac{1}{epsilon} +3$. If we pick $n_0 =lceilfrac{1}{epsilon} +3rceil$, it will also be automatically larger than $3$. We can now write our proof:



Proof:
For all $epsilon>0$, we let $n_0=lceil{frac{1}{epsilon}+3 }rceil$ then for all $n>n_0$, we know that:



$$|a_n-0|=left|frac{n+3}{n^2-3} right|<frac{n+3}{n^2-9}=frac{1}{n-3}< frac{1}{frac{1}{epsilon}+3-3}=epsilon$$
And hence our sequence converges to $0$ $square$.



Is my proof okay?







real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-verification epsilon-delta






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday

























asked yesterday









WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo

773217




773217








  • 1




    I think you should make explicit that since $epsilon>0$, then $n_0geq 4$, so the denominator in $leftlvertfrac{n+3}{n^2-3}rightrvert$ is positive, so you can remove the absolute value sign. Otherwise, I think the proof is perfect.
    – YiFan
    yesterday






  • 1




    Yes, perfect! Just another small mistake: twice you wrote $epsilon$ instead of $1/epsilon$. I guess it was just a type since you continued correctly.
    – maxmilgram
    yesterday










  • I do make the case that the denominator is positive, It's in the first line.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday










  • Maybe I should say it explicitly.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday














  • 1




    I think you should make explicit that since $epsilon>0$, then $n_0geq 4$, so the denominator in $leftlvertfrac{n+3}{n^2-3}rightrvert$ is positive, so you can remove the absolute value sign. Otherwise, I think the proof is perfect.
    – YiFan
    yesterday






  • 1




    Yes, perfect! Just another small mistake: twice you wrote $epsilon$ instead of $1/epsilon$. I guess it was just a type since you continued correctly.
    – maxmilgram
    yesterday










  • I do make the case that the denominator is positive, It's in the first line.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday










  • Maybe I should say it explicitly.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday








1




1




I think you should make explicit that since $epsilon>0$, then $n_0geq 4$, so the denominator in $leftlvertfrac{n+3}{n^2-3}rightrvert$ is positive, so you can remove the absolute value sign. Otherwise, I think the proof is perfect.
– YiFan
yesterday




I think you should make explicit that since $epsilon>0$, then $n_0geq 4$, so the denominator in $leftlvertfrac{n+3}{n^2-3}rightrvert$ is positive, so you can remove the absolute value sign. Otherwise, I think the proof is perfect.
– YiFan
yesterday




1




1




Yes, perfect! Just another small mistake: twice you wrote $epsilon$ instead of $1/epsilon$. I guess it was just a type since you continued correctly.
– maxmilgram
yesterday




Yes, perfect! Just another small mistake: twice you wrote $epsilon$ instead of $1/epsilon$. I guess it was just a type since you continued correctly.
– maxmilgram
yesterday












I do make the case that the denominator is positive, It's in the first line.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday




I do make the case that the denominator is positive, It's in the first line.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday












Maybe I should say it explicitly.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday




Maybe I should say it explicitly.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Yup, the proof is correct.



Also, "we write $n-3>color{blue}{frac1{epsilon}}$"






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Why is this an inequality and not an equality? we can just cancel the $n+3$ right?
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday






  • 1




    oops, you are right. I made a mistake.
    – Siong Thye Goh
    yesterday










  • Thank you. I did do a typo :) you were right about that
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday








  • 1




    huzzah! I've done it :D
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday


















up vote
2
down vote













Alternatively, decompose



$$frac{n+3}{n^2-3}=frac1{n-sqrt3}+(3-sqrt3)frac1{n^2-3}$$



and the two terms are of the form $dfrac1infty$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • That could work later on in the course, right now I am not yet allowed to use this.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday










  • I realised this is okay since sequences map to $mathbb{R}$, so you can write it in this manner.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday










  • @WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo: isn't $epsilon$ in $mathbb R$ ?
    – Yves Daoust
    yesterday










  • Yes, of course :)
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000830%2fattempt-at-sequence-proof-fracn3n2-3-converges-to-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Yup, the proof is correct.



Also, "we write $n-3>color{blue}{frac1{epsilon}}$"






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Why is this an inequality and not an equality? we can just cancel the $n+3$ right?
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday






  • 1




    oops, you are right. I made a mistake.
    – Siong Thye Goh
    yesterday










  • Thank you. I did do a typo :) you were right about that
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday








  • 1




    huzzah! I've done it :D
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Yup, the proof is correct.



Also, "we write $n-3>color{blue}{frac1{epsilon}}$"






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Why is this an inequality and not an equality? we can just cancel the $n+3$ right?
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday






  • 1




    oops, you are right. I made a mistake.
    – Siong Thye Goh
    yesterday










  • Thank you. I did do a typo :) you were right about that
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday








  • 1




    huzzah! I've done it :D
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday













up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






Yup, the proof is correct.



Also, "we write $n-3>color{blue}{frac1{epsilon}}$"






share|cite|improve this answer














Yup, the proof is correct.



Also, "we write $n-3>color{blue}{frac1{epsilon}}$"







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered yesterday









Siong Thye Goh

92.6k1462114




92.6k1462114












  • Why is this an inequality and not an equality? we can just cancel the $n+3$ right?
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday






  • 1




    oops, you are right. I made a mistake.
    – Siong Thye Goh
    yesterday










  • Thank you. I did do a typo :) you were right about that
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday








  • 1




    huzzah! I've done it :D
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday


















  • Why is this an inequality and not an equality? we can just cancel the $n+3$ right?
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday






  • 1




    oops, you are right. I made a mistake.
    – Siong Thye Goh
    yesterday










  • Thank you. I did do a typo :) you were right about that
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday








  • 1




    huzzah! I've done it :D
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday
















Why is this an inequality and not an equality? we can just cancel the $n+3$ right?
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday




Why is this an inequality and not an equality? we can just cancel the $n+3$ right?
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday




1




1




oops, you are right. I made a mistake.
– Siong Thye Goh
yesterday




oops, you are right. I made a mistake.
– Siong Thye Goh
yesterday












Thank you. I did do a typo :) you were right about that
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday






Thank you. I did do a typo :) you were right about that
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday






1




1




huzzah! I've done it :D
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday




huzzah! I've done it :D
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday










up vote
2
down vote













Alternatively, decompose



$$frac{n+3}{n^2-3}=frac1{n-sqrt3}+(3-sqrt3)frac1{n^2-3}$$



and the two terms are of the form $dfrac1infty$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • That could work later on in the course, right now I am not yet allowed to use this.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday










  • I realised this is okay since sequences map to $mathbb{R}$, so you can write it in this manner.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday










  • @WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo: isn't $epsilon$ in $mathbb R$ ?
    – Yves Daoust
    yesterday










  • Yes, of course :)
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday















up vote
2
down vote













Alternatively, decompose



$$frac{n+3}{n^2-3}=frac1{n-sqrt3}+(3-sqrt3)frac1{n^2-3}$$



and the two terms are of the form $dfrac1infty$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • That could work later on in the course, right now I am not yet allowed to use this.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday










  • I realised this is okay since sequences map to $mathbb{R}$, so you can write it in this manner.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday










  • @WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo: isn't $epsilon$ in $mathbb R$ ?
    – Yves Daoust
    yesterday










  • Yes, of course :)
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday













up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









Alternatively, decompose



$$frac{n+3}{n^2-3}=frac1{n-sqrt3}+(3-sqrt3)frac1{n^2-3}$$



and the two terms are of the form $dfrac1infty$.






share|cite|improve this answer












Alternatively, decompose



$$frac{n+3}{n^2-3}=frac1{n-sqrt3}+(3-sqrt3)frac1{n^2-3}$$



and the two terms are of the form $dfrac1infty$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered yesterday









Yves Daoust

121k668217




121k668217












  • That could work later on in the course, right now I am not yet allowed to use this.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday










  • I realised this is okay since sequences map to $mathbb{R}$, so you can write it in this manner.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday










  • @WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo: isn't $epsilon$ in $mathbb R$ ?
    – Yves Daoust
    yesterday










  • Yes, of course :)
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday


















  • That could work later on in the course, right now I am not yet allowed to use this.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday










  • I realised this is okay since sequences map to $mathbb{R}$, so you can write it in this manner.
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday










  • @WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo: isn't $epsilon$ in $mathbb R$ ?
    – Yves Daoust
    yesterday










  • Yes, of course :)
    – WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
    yesterday
















That could work later on in the course, right now I am not yet allowed to use this.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday




That could work later on in the course, right now I am not yet allowed to use this.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday












I realised this is okay since sequences map to $mathbb{R}$, so you can write it in this manner.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday




I realised this is okay since sequences map to $mathbb{R}$, so you can write it in this manner.
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday












@WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo: isn't $epsilon$ in $mathbb R$ ?
– Yves Daoust
yesterday




@WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo: isn't $epsilon$ in $mathbb R$ ?
– Yves Daoust
yesterday












Yes, of course :)
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday




Yes, of course :)
– WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
yesterday


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000830%2fattempt-at-sequence-proof-fracn3n2-3-converges-to-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Verónica Boquete

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten