Ring Homomorphism: $mathbb{Z}[x] / (f(x)) to mathbb{Q}$











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Let $f(x) in mathbb{Z}[x]$. Prove that $f(x)$ has a root in $mathbb{Q}$ iff there is a ring homomorphism from $mathbb{Z}[x]/(f(x)) rightarrow mathbb{Q}$.



I tried using a homomorphism from $mathbb{Z}[x] rightarrow mathbb{Q}$ defined by $varphi(f(x)) = f(q)$ for a fixed $q in mathbb{Q}$. When $q$ is a root this could be useful, but that's all I've managed to come up with, and I'm unclear how to proceed.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $f(x) in mathbb{Z}[x]$. Prove that $f(x)$ has a root in $mathbb{Q}$ iff there is a ring homomorphism from $mathbb{Z}[x]/(f(x)) rightarrow mathbb{Q}$.



    I tried using a homomorphism from $mathbb{Z}[x] rightarrow mathbb{Q}$ defined by $varphi(f(x)) = f(q)$ for a fixed $q in mathbb{Q}$. When $q$ is a root this could be useful, but that's all I've managed to come up with, and I'm unclear how to proceed.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $f(x) in mathbb{Z}[x]$. Prove that $f(x)$ has a root in $mathbb{Q}$ iff there is a ring homomorphism from $mathbb{Z}[x]/(f(x)) rightarrow mathbb{Q}$.



      I tried using a homomorphism from $mathbb{Z}[x] rightarrow mathbb{Q}$ defined by $varphi(f(x)) = f(q)$ for a fixed $q in mathbb{Q}$. When $q$ is a root this could be useful, but that's all I've managed to come up with, and I'm unclear how to proceed.










      share|cite|improve this question















      Let $f(x) in mathbb{Z}[x]$. Prove that $f(x)$ has a root in $mathbb{Q}$ iff there is a ring homomorphism from $mathbb{Z}[x]/(f(x)) rightarrow mathbb{Q}$.



      I tried using a homomorphism from $mathbb{Z}[x] rightarrow mathbb{Q}$ defined by $varphi(f(x)) = f(q)$ for a fixed $q in mathbb{Q}$. When $q$ is a root this could be useful, but that's all I've managed to come up with, and I'm unclear how to proceed.







      abstract-algebra ring-theory ring-homomorphism






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      Shubham

      1,1951518




      1,1951518










      asked yesterday









      Physics Blader

      463




      463






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          The following lemma will be useful.



          Lemma. Let $varphi: A to B$ be a ring homomorphism and $I$ be an ideal of $A$. Then $varphi$ descends to a homomorphism $overline{varphi}: A/I to B$ iff $I subseteq ker(varphi)$.



          You've defined the map
          begin{align*}
          varphi: mathbb{Z}[x] &to mathbb{Q}\
          g(x) &mapsto g(q)
          end{align*}

          Can you see why you can apply the lemma to get a map on the quotient? (As a note, you shouldn't use $f(x)$ to refer to two different things.)






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            A ring homomorphism $Bbb Z[X]/(f(X))toBbb Q$ is essentially a ring homomorphism
            $phi:Bbb Z[X]toBbb Q$ with the property that $phi(f(X))=0$.



            The ring homomorphisms $Bbb Z[X]toBbb Q$ all have the form $phi_q:g(X)mapsto
            g(q)$
            for $qinBbb Q$, as you say. This map induces a homomorphism
            $Bbb Z[X]/(f(X))toBbb Q$ iff $phi_q(f(X))=0$. But $phi_q(f(X))=f(q)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Recall that a map between unital rings $mathbb{Z}[X] xrightarrow{q} A$ is determined by $q(X)$. Moreover, if $q_x := q(X)$, then $q(f) = f(q_x)$. This comes from writing $f$ as a sum of monomials, expanding and using that $f(X) = q_x$. Hence all morphisms $mathbb{Z}[X] to A$ are an evaluation.



              So, take $ev_x$ an evaluation map from $mathbb{Z}[X]$ to $mathbb{Q} ni x$. If $f(x) = ev_x(f) = 0$, then $(f) subset ker(ev_x)$ and so $ev_x$ factors through $mathbb{Z}[X]/(f)$. To see this you can appeal to the first isomorphism theorem.



              Reciprocally, if you have a morphism $q : mathbb{Z}[X]/(f) to mathbb{Q}$, then you have a morphism $g = qpi$ defined as the following composition,



              $$
              mathbb{Z}[X] xrightarrow{pi} mathbb{Z}[X]/(f) xrightarrow{q} mathbb{Q}.
              $$



              We have proved that $g equiv ev_x$ for some rational $x$. Thus,



              $$
              f(x) = ev_x(f) = g(f) = qpi(f) = q(0) = 0,
              $$



              which concludes the proof.






              share|cite|improve this answer





















                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                });
                });
                }, "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                 

                draft saved


                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000767%2fring-homomorphism-mathbbzx-fx-to-mathbbq%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes








                up vote
                1
                down vote













                The following lemma will be useful.



                Lemma. Let $varphi: A to B$ be a ring homomorphism and $I$ be an ideal of $A$. Then $varphi$ descends to a homomorphism $overline{varphi}: A/I to B$ iff $I subseteq ker(varphi)$.



                You've defined the map
                begin{align*}
                varphi: mathbb{Z}[x] &to mathbb{Q}\
                g(x) &mapsto g(q)
                end{align*}

                Can you see why you can apply the lemma to get a map on the quotient? (As a note, you shouldn't use $f(x)$ to refer to two different things.)






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote













                  The following lemma will be useful.



                  Lemma. Let $varphi: A to B$ be a ring homomorphism and $I$ be an ideal of $A$. Then $varphi$ descends to a homomorphism $overline{varphi}: A/I to B$ iff $I subseteq ker(varphi)$.



                  You've defined the map
                  begin{align*}
                  varphi: mathbb{Z}[x] &to mathbb{Q}\
                  g(x) &mapsto g(q)
                  end{align*}

                  Can you see why you can apply the lemma to get a map on the quotient? (As a note, you shouldn't use $f(x)$ to refer to two different things.)






                  share|cite|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote









                    The following lemma will be useful.



                    Lemma. Let $varphi: A to B$ be a ring homomorphism and $I$ be an ideal of $A$. Then $varphi$ descends to a homomorphism $overline{varphi}: A/I to B$ iff $I subseteq ker(varphi)$.



                    You've defined the map
                    begin{align*}
                    varphi: mathbb{Z}[x] &to mathbb{Q}\
                    g(x) &mapsto g(q)
                    end{align*}

                    Can you see why you can apply the lemma to get a map on the quotient? (As a note, you shouldn't use $f(x)$ to refer to two different things.)






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    The following lemma will be useful.



                    Lemma. Let $varphi: A to B$ be a ring homomorphism and $I$ be an ideal of $A$. Then $varphi$ descends to a homomorphism $overline{varphi}: A/I to B$ iff $I subseteq ker(varphi)$.



                    You've defined the map
                    begin{align*}
                    varphi: mathbb{Z}[x] &to mathbb{Q}\
                    g(x) &mapsto g(q)
                    end{align*}

                    Can you see why you can apply the lemma to get a map on the quotient? (As a note, you shouldn't use $f(x)$ to refer to two different things.)







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered yesterday









                    André 3000

                    12.1k22041




                    12.1k22041






















                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        A ring homomorphism $Bbb Z[X]/(f(X))toBbb Q$ is essentially a ring homomorphism
                        $phi:Bbb Z[X]toBbb Q$ with the property that $phi(f(X))=0$.



                        The ring homomorphisms $Bbb Z[X]toBbb Q$ all have the form $phi_q:g(X)mapsto
                        g(q)$
                        for $qinBbb Q$, as you say. This map induces a homomorphism
                        $Bbb Z[X]/(f(X))toBbb Q$ iff $phi_q(f(X))=0$. But $phi_q(f(X))=f(q)$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          A ring homomorphism $Bbb Z[X]/(f(X))toBbb Q$ is essentially a ring homomorphism
                          $phi:Bbb Z[X]toBbb Q$ with the property that $phi(f(X))=0$.



                          The ring homomorphisms $Bbb Z[X]toBbb Q$ all have the form $phi_q:g(X)mapsto
                          g(q)$
                          for $qinBbb Q$, as you say. This map induces a homomorphism
                          $Bbb Z[X]/(f(X))toBbb Q$ iff $phi_q(f(X))=0$. But $phi_q(f(X))=f(q)$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote









                            A ring homomorphism $Bbb Z[X]/(f(X))toBbb Q$ is essentially a ring homomorphism
                            $phi:Bbb Z[X]toBbb Q$ with the property that $phi(f(X))=0$.



                            The ring homomorphisms $Bbb Z[X]toBbb Q$ all have the form $phi_q:g(X)mapsto
                            g(q)$
                            for $qinBbb Q$, as you say. This map induces a homomorphism
                            $Bbb Z[X]/(f(X))toBbb Q$ iff $phi_q(f(X))=0$. But $phi_q(f(X))=f(q)$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            A ring homomorphism $Bbb Z[X]/(f(X))toBbb Q$ is essentially a ring homomorphism
                            $phi:Bbb Z[X]toBbb Q$ with the property that $phi(f(X))=0$.



                            The ring homomorphisms $Bbb Z[X]toBbb Q$ all have the form $phi_q:g(X)mapsto
                            g(q)$
                            for $qinBbb Q$, as you say. This map induces a homomorphism
                            $Bbb Z[X]/(f(X))toBbb Q$ iff $phi_q(f(X))=0$. But $phi_q(f(X))=f(q)$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered yesterday









                            Lord Shark the Unknown

                            96.7k958128




                            96.7k958128






















                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote













                                Recall that a map between unital rings $mathbb{Z}[X] xrightarrow{q} A$ is determined by $q(X)$. Moreover, if $q_x := q(X)$, then $q(f) = f(q_x)$. This comes from writing $f$ as a sum of monomials, expanding and using that $f(X) = q_x$. Hence all morphisms $mathbb{Z}[X] to A$ are an evaluation.



                                So, take $ev_x$ an evaluation map from $mathbb{Z}[X]$ to $mathbb{Q} ni x$. If $f(x) = ev_x(f) = 0$, then $(f) subset ker(ev_x)$ and so $ev_x$ factors through $mathbb{Z}[X]/(f)$. To see this you can appeal to the first isomorphism theorem.



                                Reciprocally, if you have a morphism $q : mathbb{Z}[X]/(f) to mathbb{Q}$, then you have a morphism $g = qpi$ defined as the following composition,



                                $$
                                mathbb{Z}[X] xrightarrow{pi} mathbb{Z}[X]/(f) xrightarrow{q} mathbb{Q}.
                                $$



                                We have proved that $g equiv ev_x$ for some rational $x$. Thus,



                                $$
                                f(x) = ev_x(f) = g(f) = qpi(f) = q(0) = 0,
                                $$



                                which concludes the proof.






                                share|cite|improve this answer

























                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  Recall that a map between unital rings $mathbb{Z}[X] xrightarrow{q} A$ is determined by $q(X)$. Moreover, if $q_x := q(X)$, then $q(f) = f(q_x)$. This comes from writing $f$ as a sum of monomials, expanding and using that $f(X) = q_x$. Hence all morphisms $mathbb{Z}[X] to A$ are an evaluation.



                                  So, take $ev_x$ an evaluation map from $mathbb{Z}[X]$ to $mathbb{Q} ni x$. If $f(x) = ev_x(f) = 0$, then $(f) subset ker(ev_x)$ and so $ev_x$ factors through $mathbb{Z}[X]/(f)$. To see this you can appeal to the first isomorphism theorem.



                                  Reciprocally, if you have a morphism $q : mathbb{Z}[X]/(f) to mathbb{Q}$, then you have a morphism $g = qpi$ defined as the following composition,



                                  $$
                                  mathbb{Z}[X] xrightarrow{pi} mathbb{Z}[X]/(f) xrightarrow{q} mathbb{Q}.
                                  $$



                                  We have proved that $g equiv ev_x$ for some rational $x$. Thus,



                                  $$
                                  f(x) = ev_x(f) = g(f) = qpi(f) = q(0) = 0,
                                  $$



                                  which concludes the proof.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer























                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote










                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote









                                    Recall that a map between unital rings $mathbb{Z}[X] xrightarrow{q} A$ is determined by $q(X)$. Moreover, if $q_x := q(X)$, then $q(f) = f(q_x)$. This comes from writing $f$ as a sum of monomials, expanding and using that $f(X) = q_x$. Hence all morphisms $mathbb{Z}[X] to A$ are an evaluation.



                                    So, take $ev_x$ an evaluation map from $mathbb{Z}[X]$ to $mathbb{Q} ni x$. If $f(x) = ev_x(f) = 0$, then $(f) subset ker(ev_x)$ and so $ev_x$ factors through $mathbb{Z}[X]/(f)$. To see this you can appeal to the first isomorphism theorem.



                                    Reciprocally, if you have a morphism $q : mathbb{Z}[X]/(f) to mathbb{Q}$, then you have a morphism $g = qpi$ defined as the following composition,



                                    $$
                                    mathbb{Z}[X] xrightarrow{pi} mathbb{Z}[X]/(f) xrightarrow{q} mathbb{Q}.
                                    $$



                                    We have proved that $g equiv ev_x$ for some rational $x$. Thus,



                                    $$
                                    f(x) = ev_x(f) = g(f) = qpi(f) = q(0) = 0,
                                    $$



                                    which concludes the proof.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    Recall that a map between unital rings $mathbb{Z}[X] xrightarrow{q} A$ is determined by $q(X)$. Moreover, if $q_x := q(X)$, then $q(f) = f(q_x)$. This comes from writing $f$ as a sum of monomials, expanding and using that $f(X) = q_x$. Hence all morphisms $mathbb{Z}[X] to A$ are an evaluation.



                                    So, take $ev_x$ an evaluation map from $mathbb{Z}[X]$ to $mathbb{Q} ni x$. If $f(x) = ev_x(f) = 0$, then $(f) subset ker(ev_x)$ and so $ev_x$ factors through $mathbb{Z}[X]/(f)$. To see this you can appeal to the first isomorphism theorem.



                                    Reciprocally, if you have a morphism $q : mathbb{Z}[X]/(f) to mathbb{Q}$, then you have a morphism $g = qpi$ defined as the following composition,



                                    $$
                                    mathbb{Z}[X] xrightarrow{pi} mathbb{Z}[X]/(f) xrightarrow{q} mathbb{Q}.
                                    $$



                                    We have proved that $g equiv ev_x$ for some rational $x$. Thus,



                                    $$
                                    f(x) = ev_x(f) = g(f) = qpi(f) = q(0) = 0,
                                    $$



                                    which concludes the proof.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered yesterday









                                    Guido A.

                                    6,6171730




                                    6,6171730






























                                         

                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded



















































                                         


                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000767%2fring-homomorphism-mathbbzx-fx-to-mathbbq%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Bundesstraße 106

                                        Verónica Boquete

                                        Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten