Probability of picking 3 playing cards that belong to different suits











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












If you have 52 playing cards with 4 different suits (13 spades, 13 clubs, 13 hearts, and 13 diamonds), what is the probability of picking 3 random cards that are all from a different suit?



I tried going about this by writing down all 52 cards and I found out that, if you were to pick a second card, the probability of the second card being from a different suit is 39/51, since there are 51 cards left, with 12 of them being from the same suit as the first card you picked (51-12=39).



However, when I tried to do the same thing with a third card, I got 26/50, since there are 50 cards left, and, assuming the first 2 cards you picked are from a different suit, the probability of the third card being from a different suit would be 50 cards - 12 cards of the same suit * 2 different suits =26 out of 50.



Unfortunately, I realized that it's also possible for the second card you pick to belong to the same suit as the first one, so, in that case, there would also be 50 cards left, and the probability is not the same since there would also be 50 cards left, but 39 cards would belong to a different suit, so I got 39/50.



After that, I realized that I had just managed to confuse myself more than I should have and couldn't really figure out where to go from there. Where did I go wrong and what is the proper way to solve this problem?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




John Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • "I realized that it's also possible for the second card you pick to belong to the same suit as the first one" -- With respect this to this comment, it brings up a question. The question you seem to be asking in the opening parts of the question seems to imply that you want all three to be from different suits (i.e. Spade/Spade/Heart is not valid). Yet the quote seems to imply this is okay. This is an important nuance to settle for probably everyone's sake.
    – Eevee Trainer
    yesterday












  • Sorry about that. You're right. Spade/Spade/Heart would not be a valid combination in this scenario. I nonetheless mentioned it, thinking that it could somehow affect the probability of the third card belonging to a different suit. I didn't mean to imply that it actually was a valid combination. Which is why I also said that I just confused myself even more, since this would contradict the initial statement.
    – John Smith
    yesterday















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












If you have 52 playing cards with 4 different suits (13 spades, 13 clubs, 13 hearts, and 13 diamonds), what is the probability of picking 3 random cards that are all from a different suit?



I tried going about this by writing down all 52 cards and I found out that, if you were to pick a second card, the probability of the second card being from a different suit is 39/51, since there are 51 cards left, with 12 of them being from the same suit as the first card you picked (51-12=39).



However, when I tried to do the same thing with a third card, I got 26/50, since there are 50 cards left, and, assuming the first 2 cards you picked are from a different suit, the probability of the third card being from a different suit would be 50 cards - 12 cards of the same suit * 2 different suits =26 out of 50.



Unfortunately, I realized that it's also possible for the second card you pick to belong to the same suit as the first one, so, in that case, there would also be 50 cards left, and the probability is not the same since there would also be 50 cards left, but 39 cards would belong to a different suit, so I got 39/50.



After that, I realized that I had just managed to confuse myself more than I should have and couldn't really figure out where to go from there. Where did I go wrong and what is the proper way to solve this problem?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




John Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • "I realized that it's also possible for the second card you pick to belong to the same suit as the first one" -- With respect this to this comment, it brings up a question. The question you seem to be asking in the opening parts of the question seems to imply that you want all three to be from different suits (i.e. Spade/Spade/Heart is not valid). Yet the quote seems to imply this is okay. This is an important nuance to settle for probably everyone's sake.
    – Eevee Trainer
    yesterday












  • Sorry about that. You're right. Spade/Spade/Heart would not be a valid combination in this scenario. I nonetheless mentioned it, thinking that it could somehow affect the probability of the third card belonging to a different suit. I didn't mean to imply that it actually was a valid combination. Which is why I also said that I just confused myself even more, since this would contradict the initial statement.
    – John Smith
    yesterday













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











If you have 52 playing cards with 4 different suits (13 spades, 13 clubs, 13 hearts, and 13 diamonds), what is the probability of picking 3 random cards that are all from a different suit?



I tried going about this by writing down all 52 cards and I found out that, if you were to pick a second card, the probability of the second card being from a different suit is 39/51, since there are 51 cards left, with 12 of them being from the same suit as the first card you picked (51-12=39).



However, when I tried to do the same thing with a third card, I got 26/50, since there are 50 cards left, and, assuming the first 2 cards you picked are from a different suit, the probability of the third card being from a different suit would be 50 cards - 12 cards of the same suit * 2 different suits =26 out of 50.



Unfortunately, I realized that it's also possible for the second card you pick to belong to the same suit as the first one, so, in that case, there would also be 50 cards left, and the probability is not the same since there would also be 50 cards left, but 39 cards would belong to a different suit, so I got 39/50.



After that, I realized that I had just managed to confuse myself more than I should have and couldn't really figure out where to go from there. Where did I go wrong and what is the proper way to solve this problem?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




John Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











If you have 52 playing cards with 4 different suits (13 spades, 13 clubs, 13 hearts, and 13 diamonds), what is the probability of picking 3 random cards that are all from a different suit?



I tried going about this by writing down all 52 cards and I found out that, if you were to pick a second card, the probability of the second card being from a different suit is 39/51, since there are 51 cards left, with 12 of them being from the same suit as the first card you picked (51-12=39).



However, when I tried to do the same thing with a third card, I got 26/50, since there are 50 cards left, and, assuming the first 2 cards you picked are from a different suit, the probability of the third card being from a different suit would be 50 cards - 12 cards of the same suit * 2 different suits =26 out of 50.



Unfortunately, I realized that it's also possible for the second card you pick to belong to the same suit as the first one, so, in that case, there would also be 50 cards left, and the probability is not the same since there would also be 50 cards left, but 39 cards would belong to a different suit, so I got 39/50.



After that, I realized that I had just managed to confuse myself more than I should have and couldn't really figure out where to go from there. Where did I go wrong and what is the proper way to solve this problem?







probability random






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




John Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




John Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




John Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









John Smith

1




1




New contributor




John Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





John Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






John Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • "I realized that it's also possible for the second card you pick to belong to the same suit as the first one" -- With respect this to this comment, it brings up a question. The question you seem to be asking in the opening parts of the question seems to imply that you want all three to be from different suits (i.e. Spade/Spade/Heart is not valid). Yet the quote seems to imply this is okay. This is an important nuance to settle for probably everyone's sake.
    – Eevee Trainer
    yesterday












  • Sorry about that. You're right. Spade/Spade/Heart would not be a valid combination in this scenario. I nonetheless mentioned it, thinking that it could somehow affect the probability of the third card belonging to a different suit. I didn't mean to imply that it actually was a valid combination. Which is why I also said that I just confused myself even more, since this would contradict the initial statement.
    – John Smith
    yesterday


















  • "I realized that it's also possible for the second card you pick to belong to the same suit as the first one" -- With respect this to this comment, it brings up a question. The question you seem to be asking in the opening parts of the question seems to imply that you want all three to be from different suits (i.e. Spade/Spade/Heart is not valid). Yet the quote seems to imply this is okay. This is an important nuance to settle for probably everyone's sake.
    – Eevee Trainer
    yesterday












  • Sorry about that. You're right. Spade/Spade/Heart would not be a valid combination in this scenario. I nonetheless mentioned it, thinking that it could somehow affect the probability of the third card belonging to a different suit. I didn't mean to imply that it actually was a valid combination. Which is why I also said that I just confused myself even more, since this would contradict the initial statement.
    – John Smith
    yesterday
















"I realized that it's also possible for the second card you pick to belong to the same suit as the first one" -- With respect this to this comment, it brings up a question. The question you seem to be asking in the opening parts of the question seems to imply that you want all three to be from different suits (i.e. Spade/Spade/Heart is not valid). Yet the quote seems to imply this is okay. This is an important nuance to settle for probably everyone's sake.
– Eevee Trainer
yesterday






"I realized that it's also possible for the second card you pick to belong to the same suit as the first one" -- With respect this to this comment, it brings up a question. The question you seem to be asking in the opening parts of the question seems to imply that you want all three to be from different suits (i.e. Spade/Spade/Heart is not valid). Yet the quote seems to imply this is okay. This is an important nuance to settle for probably everyone's sake.
– Eevee Trainer
yesterday














Sorry about that. You're right. Spade/Spade/Heart would not be a valid combination in this scenario. I nonetheless mentioned it, thinking that it could somehow affect the probability of the third card belonging to a different suit. I didn't mean to imply that it actually was a valid combination. Which is why I also said that I just confused myself even more, since this would contradict the initial statement.
– John Smith
yesterday




Sorry about that. You're right. Spade/Spade/Heart would not be a valid combination in this scenario. I nonetheless mentioned it, thinking that it could somehow affect the probability of the third card belonging to a different suit. I didn't mean to imply that it actually was a valid combination. Which is why I also said that I just confused myself even more, since this would contradict the initial statement.
– John Smith
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













You are correct that your chance to get an acceptable second card is $frac {39}{51}$ and that assuming the second is acceptable the chance for the third to be acceptable is $frac {26}{50}$. You don't need to worry about the chance the third is acceptable if the second is not because you have already failed. Now you can use the multiplication principle to get the probability of success
$$frac {39}{51} cdot frac {26}{50}=frac {169}{425}$$






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    There are 4 suits from which you choose 3, C(4,3)=4. There are 4 ways of choosing which suits to represent. For each of the 3 chosen suits, there are 13 options from which to choose one representative, C(13,1)=13. So there are $4*13^3$ ways of selecting these cards.



    Overall, the number of ways of choosing 3 cards from a group of 52 is :



    $C(52,3)=frac{52!}{3!49!}=frac{52*51*50}{6}=26*17*50$



    So the probability of choosing 3 cards each of different suits is : number of ways of selecting 3 cards of different suits/ total number of ways of picking 3 cards out of 52.



    ans = $frac{4*13^3}{26*17*50}=frac{4*13^2}{2*17*50}=frac{169}{425}$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      John Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000750%2fprobability-of-picking-3-playing-cards-that-belong-to-different-suits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      1
      down vote













      You are correct that your chance to get an acceptable second card is $frac {39}{51}$ and that assuming the second is acceptable the chance for the third to be acceptable is $frac {26}{50}$. You don't need to worry about the chance the third is acceptable if the second is not because you have already failed. Now you can use the multiplication principle to get the probability of success
      $$frac {39}{51} cdot frac {26}{50}=frac {169}{425}$$






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote













        You are correct that your chance to get an acceptable second card is $frac {39}{51}$ and that assuming the second is acceptable the chance for the third to be acceptable is $frac {26}{50}$. You don't need to worry about the chance the third is acceptable if the second is not because you have already failed. Now you can use the multiplication principle to get the probability of success
        $$frac {39}{51} cdot frac {26}{50}=frac {169}{425}$$






        share|cite|improve this answer























          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          You are correct that your chance to get an acceptable second card is $frac {39}{51}$ and that assuming the second is acceptable the chance for the third to be acceptable is $frac {26}{50}$. You don't need to worry about the chance the third is acceptable if the second is not because you have already failed. Now you can use the multiplication principle to get the probability of success
          $$frac {39}{51} cdot frac {26}{50}=frac {169}{425}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          You are correct that your chance to get an acceptable second card is $frac {39}{51}$ and that assuming the second is acceptable the chance for the third to be acceptable is $frac {26}{50}$. You don't need to worry about the chance the third is acceptable if the second is not because you have already failed. Now you can use the multiplication principle to get the probability of success
          $$frac {39}{51} cdot frac {26}{50}=frac {169}{425}$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          Ross Millikan

          286k23195363




          286k23195363






















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              There are 4 suits from which you choose 3, C(4,3)=4. There are 4 ways of choosing which suits to represent. For each of the 3 chosen suits, there are 13 options from which to choose one representative, C(13,1)=13. So there are $4*13^3$ ways of selecting these cards.



              Overall, the number of ways of choosing 3 cards from a group of 52 is :



              $C(52,3)=frac{52!}{3!49!}=frac{52*51*50}{6}=26*17*50$



              So the probability of choosing 3 cards each of different suits is : number of ways of selecting 3 cards of different suits/ total number of ways of picking 3 cards out of 52.



              ans = $frac{4*13^3}{26*17*50}=frac{4*13^2}{2*17*50}=frac{169}{425}$






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                There are 4 suits from which you choose 3, C(4,3)=4. There are 4 ways of choosing which suits to represent. For each of the 3 chosen suits, there are 13 options from which to choose one representative, C(13,1)=13. So there are $4*13^3$ ways of selecting these cards.



                Overall, the number of ways of choosing 3 cards from a group of 52 is :



                $C(52,3)=frac{52!}{3!49!}=frac{52*51*50}{6}=26*17*50$



                So the probability of choosing 3 cards each of different suits is : number of ways of selecting 3 cards of different suits/ total number of ways of picking 3 cards out of 52.



                ans = $frac{4*13^3}{26*17*50}=frac{4*13^2}{2*17*50}=frac{169}{425}$






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  There are 4 suits from which you choose 3, C(4,3)=4. There are 4 ways of choosing which suits to represent. For each of the 3 chosen suits, there are 13 options from which to choose one representative, C(13,1)=13. So there are $4*13^3$ ways of selecting these cards.



                  Overall, the number of ways of choosing 3 cards from a group of 52 is :



                  $C(52,3)=frac{52!}{3!49!}=frac{52*51*50}{6}=26*17*50$



                  So the probability of choosing 3 cards each of different suits is : number of ways of selecting 3 cards of different suits/ total number of ways of picking 3 cards out of 52.



                  ans = $frac{4*13^3}{26*17*50}=frac{4*13^2}{2*17*50}=frac{169}{425}$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  There are 4 suits from which you choose 3, C(4,3)=4. There are 4 ways of choosing which suits to represent. For each of the 3 chosen suits, there are 13 options from which to choose one representative, C(13,1)=13. So there are $4*13^3$ ways of selecting these cards.



                  Overall, the number of ways of choosing 3 cards from a group of 52 is :



                  $C(52,3)=frac{52!}{3!49!}=frac{52*51*50}{6}=26*17*50$



                  So the probability of choosing 3 cards each of different suits is : number of ways of selecting 3 cards of different suits/ total number of ways of picking 3 cards out of 52.



                  ans = $frac{4*13^3}{26*17*50}=frac{4*13^2}{2*17*50}=frac{169}{425}$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  TurlocTheRed

                  55819




                  55819






















                      John Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


















                      John Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      John Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      John Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000750%2fprobability-of-picking-3-playing-cards-that-belong-to-different-suits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Le Mesnil-Réaume

                      Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                      web3.py web3.isConnected() returns false always