Find Equivalence Classes and the quotient set defined by the relationship in Reals.
$begingroup$
$xTyiff |x^{2}-2|=|y^{2}-2|$
I'd love to solve it but we don't deal in absolutes. Joke aside I have no clue where to start with this one, it has me stumped.
If I had been provided the answer to the problem I could just bump around until I got there but its not the case.
$x^{2}-y^{2}=0 rightarrow (x+y)(x-y)=0 rightarrow x=y lor x=-y$
Is the only thing that I can scavenge from this, but I doubt it covers all the classes, thus I can't even begin to partition the set.
$cl(x)={xin R:x,-x,x-2,2-x}$ But I'm not sure x-2 and 2-x counts in general I think it's only valid if x=0.
discrete-mathematics equivalence-relations set-partition
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$xTyiff |x^{2}-2|=|y^{2}-2|$
I'd love to solve it but we don't deal in absolutes. Joke aside I have no clue where to start with this one, it has me stumped.
If I had been provided the answer to the problem I could just bump around until I got there but its not the case.
$x^{2}-y^{2}=0 rightarrow (x+y)(x-y)=0 rightarrow x=y lor x=-y$
Is the only thing that I can scavenge from this, but I doubt it covers all the classes, thus I can't even begin to partition the set.
$cl(x)={xin R:x,-x,x-2,2-x}$ But I'm not sure x-2 and 2-x counts in general I think it's only valid if x=0.
discrete-mathematics equivalence-relations set-partition
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Work out the cases when expressions in absolutes are positive and negative. For each, you'll get one class, $2$ in total, if I'm not mistaken. You can draw the graphs of each to get the visual representation of $x$ being related to $y$.
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 20:38
$begingroup$
Bear in mind a class $[k] = {xin mathbb R| xTk} = {x in mathbb R:|x^2 -2| = |k^2 - 2|}$. Just solve that.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 20 '18 at 21:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$xTyiff |x^{2}-2|=|y^{2}-2|$
I'd love to solve it but we don't deal in absolutes. Joke aside I have no clue where to start with this one, it has me stumped.
If I had been provided the answer to the problem I could just bump around until I got there but its not the case.
$x^{2}-y^{2}=0 rightarrow (x+y)(x-y)=0 rightarrow x=y lor x=-y$
Is the only thing that I can scavenge from this, but I doubt it covers all the classes, thus I can't even begin to partition the set.
$cl(x)={xin R:x,-x,x-2,2-x}$ But I'm not sure x-2 and 2-x counts in general I think it's only valid if x=0.
discrete-mathematics equivalence-relations set-partition
$endgroup$
$xTyiff |x^{2}-2|=|y^{2}-2|$
I'd love to solve it but we don't deal in absolutes. Joke aside I have no clue where to start with this one, it has me stumped.
If I had been provided the answer to the problem I could just bump around until I got there but its not the case.
$x^{2}-y^{2}=0 rightarrow (x+y)(x-y)=0 rightarrow x=y lor x=-y$
Is the only thing that I can scavenge from this, but I doubt it covers all the classes, thus I can't even begin to partition the set.
$cl(x)={xin R:x,-x,x-2,2-x}$ But I'm not sure x-2 and 2-x counts in general I think it's only valid if x=0.
discrete-mathematics equivalence-relations set-partition
discrete-mathematics equivalence-relations set-partition
edited Dec 20 '18 at 19:36
Agustin
asked Dec 20 '18 at 17:55
AgustinAgustin
33
33
$begingroup$
Work out the cases when expressions in absolutes are positive and negative. For each, you'll get one class, $2$ in total, if I'm not mistaken. You can draw the graphs of each to get the visual representation of $x$ being related to $y$.
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 20:38
$begingroup$
Bear in mind a class $[k] = {xin mathbb R| xTk} = {x in mathbb R:|x^2 -2| = |k^2 - 2|}$. Just solve that.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 20 '18 at 21:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Work out the cases when expressions in absolutes are positive and negative. For each, you'll get one class, $2$ in total, if I'm not mistaken. You can draw the graphs of each to get the visual representation of $x$ being related to $y$.
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 20:38
$begingroup$
Bear in mind a class $[k] = {xin mathbb R| xTk} = {x in mathbb R:|x^2 -2| = |k^2 - 2|}$. Just solve that.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 20 '18 at 21:38
$begingroup$
Work out the cases when expressions in absolutes are positive and negative. For each, you'll get one class, $2$ in total, if I'm not mistaken. You can draw the graphs of each to get the visual representation of $x$ being related to $y$.
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 20:38
$begingroup$
Work out the cases when expressions in absolutes are positive and negative. For each, you'll get one class, $2$ in total, if I'm not mistaken. You can draw the graphs of each to get the visual representation of $x$ being related to $y$.
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 20:38
$begingroup$
Bear in mind a class $[k] = {xin mathbb R| xTk} = {x in mathbb R:|x^2 -2| = |k^2 - 2|}$. Just solve that.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 20 '18 at 21:38
$begingroup$
Bear in mind a class $[k] = {xin mathbb R| xTk} = {x in mathbb R:|x^2 -2| = |k^2 - 2|}$. Just solve that.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 20 '18 at 21:38
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Well if we fix $k in mathbb R$ then
the equivalence class $[k]$ is by definition ${xin mathbb R: |x^2 -2| = |k^2 - 2|}$.
Now if $|x^2 - 2| = |k^2 - 2|$ then a) $x^2 -2 = k^2-2$ or b) $x^2 - 2 = -(k^2 -2) = 2-k^2$.
a) $x^2 - 2 = k^2 -2implies x^2 = k^2 implies x =pm k$.
b) $x^2 - 2 = 2-k^2 implies x^2 = 4 -k^2implies |k| le 2$ and $x=pm sqrt{4-k^2}$.
So $[k]={xin mathbb R: |x^2 -2| = |k^2 - 2|}=$
$={k, -k}$ if $|k| > 2$ and $= {k,-k, sqrt{4-k^2}, -sqrt{4-k^2}}$ if $|k| le 2$
=====
Note: All of this assumes $T$ is an equivalence relation in the first place.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Doesn't tansitivity just follows from relation $=$ being transitive ?
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 21:40
1
$begingroup$
Oh... $|x^2 - 2| = |y^2 - 2|$ and $|y^2-2| =|z^2 - 2|$ so .... Um, How hard a dope slap do you think a human can apply to himself? Well, double that and that's what i just gave to myself.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 20 '18 at 21:42
$begingroup$
And there it is, thanks, I know where I got lost now.
$endgroup$
– Agustin
Dec 20 '18 at 21:51
$begingroup$
Hahah + But it's not bad to see how to do it in non-trivial way too, for sure!
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 21:51
1
$begingroup$
Yeah, I also did it the hard way, because it looked too similar to a distance relation and those aren't always transitive thus not equivalent relations, only bothered to ask the second part of the question.
$endgroup$
– Agustin
Dec 20 '18 at 21:54
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047806%2ffind-equivalence-classes-and-the-quotient-set-defined-by-the-relationship-in-rea%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Well if we fix $k in mathbb R$ then
the equivalence class $[k]$ is by definition ${xin mathbb R: |x^2 -2| = |k^2 - 2|}$.
Now if $|x^2 - 2| = |k^2 - 2|$ then a) $x^2 -2 = k^2-2$ or b) $x^2 - 2 = -(k^2 -2) = 2-k^2$.
a) $x^2 - 2 = k^2 -2implies x^2 = k^2 implies x =pm k$.
b) $x^2 - 2 = 2-k^2 implies x^2 = 4 -k^2implies |k| le 2$ and $x=pm sqrt{4-k^2}$.
So $[k]={xin mathbb R: |x^2 -2| = |k^2 - 2|}=$
$={k, -k}$ if $|k| > 2$ and $= {k,-k, sqrt{4-k^2}, -sqrt{4-k^2}}$ if $|k| le 2$
=====
Note: All of this assumes $T$ is an equivalence relation in the first place.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Doesn't tansitivity just follows from relation $=$ being transitive ?
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 21:40
1
$begingroup$
Oh... $|x^2 - 2| = |y^2 - 2|$ and $|y^2-2| =|z^2 - 2|$ so .... Um, How hard a dope slap do you think a human can apply to himself? Well, double that and that's what i just gave to myself.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 20 '18 at 21:42
$begingroup$
And there it is, thanks, I know where I got lost now.
$endgroup$
– Agustin
Dec 20 '18 at 21:51
$begingroup$
Hahah + But it's not bad to see how to do it in non-trivial way too, for sure!
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 21:51
1
$begingroup$
Yeah, I also did it the hard way, because it looked too similar to a distance relation and those aren't always transitive thus not equivalent relations, only bothered to ask the second part of the question.
$endgroup$
– Agustin
Dec 20 '18 at 21:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well if we fix $k in mathbb R$ then
the equivalence class $[k]$ is by definition ${xin mathbb R: |x^2 -2| = |k^2 - 2|}$.
Now if $|x^2 - 2| = |k^2 - 2|$ then a) $x^2 -2 = k^2-2$ or b) $x^2 - 2 = -(k^2 -2) = 2-k^2$.
a) $x^2 - 2 = k^2 -2implies x^2 = k^2 implies x =pm k$.
b) $x^2 - 2 = 2-k^2 implies x^2 = 4 -k^2implies |k| le 2$ and $x=pm sqrt{4-k^2}$.
So $[k]={xin mathbb R: |x^2 -2| = |k^2 - 2|}=$
$={k, -k}$ if $|k| > 2$ and $= {k,-k, sqrt{4-k^2}, -sqrt{4-k^2}}$ if $|k| le 2$
=====
Note: All of this assumes $T$ is an equivalence relation in the first place.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Doesn't tansitivity just follows from relation $=$ being transitive ?
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 21:40
1
$begingroup$
Oh... $|x^2 - 2| = |y^2 - 2|$ and $|y^2-2| =|z^2 - 2|$ so .... Um, How hard a dope slap do you think a human can apply to himself? Well, double that and that's what i just gave to myself.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 20 '18 at 21:42
$begingroup$
And there it is, thanks, I know where I got lost now.
$endgroup$
– Agustin
Dec 20 '18 at 21:51
$begingroup$
Hahah + But it's not bad to see how to do it in non-trivial way too, for sure!
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 21:51
1
$begingroup$
Yeah, I also did it the hard way, because it looked too similar to a distance relation and those aren't always transitive thus not equivalent relations, only bothered to ask the second part of the question.
$endgroup$
– Agustin
Dec 20 '18 at 21:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well if we fix $k in mathbb R$ then
the equivalence class $[k]$ is by definition ${xin mathbb R: |x^2 -2| = |k^2 - 2|}$.
Now if $|x^2 - 2| = |k^2 - 2|$ then a) $x^2 -2 = k^2-2$ or b) $x^2 - 2 = -(k^2 -2) = 2-k^2$.
a) $x^2 - 2 = k^2 -2implies x^2 = k^2 implies x =pm k$.
b) $x^2 - 2 = 2-k^2 implies x^2 = 4 -k^2implies |k| le 2$ and $x=pm sqrt{4-k^2}$.
So $[k]={xin mathbb R: |x^2 -2| = |k^2 - 2|}=$
$={k, -k}$ if $|k| > 2$ and $= {k,-k, sqrt{4-k^2}, -sqrt{4-k^2}}$ if $|k| le 2$
=====
Note: All of this assumes $T$ is an equivalence relation in the first place.
$endgroup$
Well if we fix $k in mathbb R$ then
the equivalence class $[k]$ is by definition ${xin mathbb R: |x^2 -2| = |k^2 - 2|}$.
Now if $|x^2 - 2| = |k^2 - 2|$ then a) $x^2 -2 = k^2-2$ or b) $x^2 - 2 = -(k^2 -2) = 2-k^2$.
a) $x^2 - 2 = k^2 -2implies x^2 = k^2 implies x =pm k$.
b) $x^2 - 2 = 2-k^2 implies x^2 = 4 -k^2implies |k| le 2$ and $x=pm sqrt{4-k^2}$.
So $[k]={xin mathbb R: |x^2 -2| = |k^2 - 2|}=$
$={k, -k}$ if $|k| > 2$ and $= {k,-k, sqrt{4-k^2}, -sqrt{4-k^2}}$ if $|k| le 2$
=====
Note: All of this assumes $T$ is an equivalence relation in the first place.
edited Dec 20 '18 at 21:43
answered Dec 20 '18 at 21:36
fleabloodfleablood
73.1k22790
73.1k22790
$begingroup$
Doesn't tansitivity just follows from relation $=$ being transitive ?
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 21:40
1
$begingroup$
Oh... $|x^2 - 2| = |y^2 - 2|$ and $|y^2-2| =|z^2 - 2|$ so .... Um, How hard a dope slap do you think a human can apply to himself? Well, double that and that's what i just gave to myself.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 20 '18 at 21:42
$begingroup$
And there it is, thanks, I know where I got lost now.
$endgroup$
– Agustin
Dec 20 '18 at 21:51
$begingroup$
Hahah + But it's not bad to see how to do it in non-trivial way too, for sure!
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 21:51
1
$begingroup$
Yeah, I also did it the hard way, because it looked too similar to a distance relation and those aren't always transitive thus not equivalent relations, only bothered to ask the second part of the question.
$endgroup$
– Agustin
Dec 20 '18 at 21:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Doesn't tansitivity just follows from relation $=$ being transitive ?
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 21:40
1
$begingroup$
Oh... $|x^2 - 2| = |y^2 - 2|$ and $|y^2-2| =|z^2 - 2|$ so .... Um, How hard a dope slap do you think a human can apply to himself? Well, double that and that's what i just gave to myself.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 20 '18 at 21:42
$begingroup$
And there it is, thanks, I know where I got lost now.
$endgroup$
– Agustin
Dec 20 '18 at 21:51
$begingroup$
Hahah + But it's not bad to see how to do it in non-trivial way too, for sure!
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 21:51
1
$begingroup$
Yeah, I also did it the hard way, because it looked too similar to a distance relation and those aren't always transitive thus not equivalent relations, only bothered to ask the second part of the question.
$endgroup$
– Agustin
Dec 20 '18 at 21:54
$begingroup$
Doesn't tansitivity just follows from relation $=$ being transitive ?
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 21:40
$begingroup$
Doesn't tansitivity just follows from relation $=$ being transitive ?
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 21:40
1
1
$begingroup$
Oh... $|x^2 - 2| = |y^2 - 2|$ and $|y^2-2| =|z^2 - 2|$ so .... Um, How hard a dope slap do you think a human can apply to himself? Well, double that and that's what i just gave to myself.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 20 '18 at 21:42
$begingroup$
Oh... $|x^2 - 2| = |y^2 - 2|$ and $|y^2-2| =|z^2 - 2|$ so .... Um, How hard a dope slap do you think a human can apply to himself? Well, double that and that's what i just gave to myself.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 20 '18 at 21:42
$begingroup$
And there it is, thanks, I know where I got lost now.
$endgroup$
– Agustin
Dec 20 '18 at 21:51
$begingroup$
And there it is, thanks, I know where I got lost now.
$endgroup$
– Agustin
Dec 20 '18 at 21:51
$begingroup$
Hahah + But it's not bad to see how to do it in non-trivial way too, for sure!
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 21:51
$begingroup$
Hahah + But it's not bad to see how to do it in non-trivial way too, for sure!
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 21:51
1
1
$begingroup$
Yeah, I also did it the hard way, because it looked too similar to a distance relation and those aren't always transitive thus not equivalent relations, only bothered to ask the second part of the question.
$endgroup$
– Agustin
Dec 20 '18 at 21:54
$begingroup$
Yeah, I also did it the hard way, because it looked too similar to a distance relation and those aren't always transitive thus not equivalent relations, only bothered to ask the second part of the question.
$endgroup$
– Agustin
Dec 20 '18 at 21:54
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047806%2ffind-equivalence-classes-and-the-quotient-set-defined-by-the-relationship-in-rea%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Work out the cases when expressions in absolutes are positive and negative. For each, you'll get one class, $2$ in total, if I'm not mistaken. You can draw the graphs of each to get the visual representation of $x$ being related to $y$.
$endgroup$
– user626177
Dec 20 '18 at 20:38
$begingroup$
Bear in mind a class $[k] = {xin mathbb R| xTk} = {x in mathbb R:|x^2 -2| = |k^2 - 2|}$. Just solve that.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 20 '18 at 21:38