Solving recurrence $X_n = 4X_{n-1}+5$












1












$begingroup$


$X_n=4X_{n-1}+5$



How come the solution of this recurrence is this?



$X_n=frac834^n+frac53$



I also have that $X_0=1$.



I am using telescoping method and I am trying to solve it like this:



$X_n= 5 + 4X_{n-1}$



$X_n= 5 + 4(5+4X_{n-2})$



$X_n= 5 + 4times5 + 4times4times X_{n-2}$



But this leads to me getting $5times4^{n-1}times4^n$.



Can some please explain this to me?






discrete-mathematics recurrence-relations







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean $$x_n=4x_{n-1}+5,x_0=1$$?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Dec 15 '18 at 15:48










  • $begingroup$
    Arithmetico–geometric sequence
    $endgroup$
    – Jean-Claude Arbaut
    Dec 15 '18 at 15:54


















1












$begingroup$


$X_n=4X_{n-1}+5$



How come the solution of this recurrence is this?



$X_n=frac834^n+frac53$



I also have that $X_0=1$.



I am using telescoping method and I am trying to solve it like this:



$X_n= 5 + 4X_{n-1}$



$X_n= 5 + 4(5+4X_{n-2})$



$X_n= 5 + 4times5 + 4times4times X_{n-2}$



But this leads to me getting $5times4^{n-1}times4^n$.



Can some please explain this to me?






discrete-mathematics recurrence-relations







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean $$x_n=4x_{n-1}+5,x_0=1$$?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Dec 15 '18 at 15:48










  • $begingroup$
    Arithmetico–geometric sequence
    $endgroup$
    – Jean-Claude Arbaut
    Dec 15 '18 at 15:54
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


$X_n=4X_{n-1}+5$



How come the solution of this recurrence is this?



$X_n=frac834^n+frac53$



I also have that $X_0=1$.



I am using telescoping method and I am trying to solve it like this:



$X_n= 5 + 4X_{n-1}$



$X_n= 5 + 4(5+4X_{n-2})$



$X_n= 5 + 4times5 + 4times4times X_{n-2}$



But this leads to me getting $5times4^{n-1}times4^n$.



Can some please explain this to me?






discrete-mathematics recurrence-relations







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




$X_n=4X_{n-1}+5$



How come the solution of this recurrence is this?



$X_n=frac834^n+frac53$



I also have that $X_0=1$.



I am using telescoping method and I am trying to solve it like this:



$X_n= 5 + 4X_{n-1}$



$X_n= 5 + 4(5+4X_{n-2})$



$X_n= 5 + 4times5 + 4times4times X_{n-2}$



But this leads to me getting $5times4^{n-1}times4^n$.



Can some please explain this to me?






discrete-mathematics recurrence-relations




discrete-mathematics recurrence-relations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 15 '18 at 15:53









Jean-Claude Arbaut

14.8k63464




14.8k63464










asked Dec 15 '18 at 15:46









ponikoliponikoli

416




416












  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean $$x_n=4x_{n-1}+5,x_0=1$$?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Dec 15 '18 at 15:48










  • $begingroup$
    Arithmetico–geometric sequence
    $endgroup$
    – Jean-Claude Arbaut
    Dec 15 '18 at 15:54




















  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean $$x_n=4x_{n-1}+5,x_0=1$$?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Dec 15 '18 at 15:48










  • $begingroup$
    Arithmetico–geometric sequence
    $endgroup$
    – Jean-Claude Arbaut
    Dec 15 '18 at 15:54


















$begingroup$
Do you mean $$x_n=4x_{n-1}+5,x_0=1$$?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Dec 15 '18 at 15:48




$begingroup$
Do you mean $$x_n=4x_{n-1}+5,x_0=1$$?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Dec 15 '18 at 15:48












$begingroup$
Arithmetico–geometric sequence
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Dec 15 '18 at 15:54






$begingroup$
Arithmetico–geometric sequence
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Dec 15 '18 at 15:54












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

If you calculate the first few terms explicitly, you will find that the $n$th term is the sum of an exponential and a geometric series. For example,



$$
X_3 = 4^3 + 5(4^2+4+1).
$$
So in general,
$$
X_n = 4^n + 5sum_{k=0}^{n-1}4^k = 4^n +5frac{1-4^n}{1-4},
$$



which should simplify to the answer you gave.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Okay, that makes sense. But it looks like a different solution then from what is written in my textbook?
    $endgroup$
    – ponikoli
    Dec 15 '18 at 16:18



















0












$begingroup$

Let $x_m=y_m+aimplies y_0=x_0-a=1-a$



$$5=x_n-4x_{n-1}=y_n+a-4(y_{m-1}+a)=y_n-4y_{n-1}-3a$$



Set $-3a=5iff a=?$ so that $y_n=4y_{n-1}=cdots=4^ry_{n-r},0le rle n$



$r=nimplies y_n=4^ny_0=4^n(1-a)$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    -1












    $begingroup$

    This is a difference equation and it can be solved using Z-Transform. Take Z-transform of both sides of the equation and then use the initial condition. Ultimately, you will get Z-transform of X and then take its inverse z-transform to get the solution.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      The loooong road.
      $endgroup$
      – Did
      Dec 17 '18 at 0:31











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3041632%2fsolving-recurrence-x-n-4x-n-15%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    If you calculate the first few terms explicitly, you will find that the $n$th term is the sum of an exponential and a geometric series. For example,



    $$
    X_3 = 4^3 + 5(4^2+4+1).
    $$
    So in general,
    $$
    X_n = 4^n + 5sum_{k=0}^{n-1}4^k = 4^n +5frac{1-4^n}{1-4},
    $$



    which should simplify to the answer you gave.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Okay, that makes sense. But it looks like a different solution then from what is written in my textbook?
      $endgroup$
      – ponikoli
      Dec 15 '18 at 16:18
















    2












    $begingroup$

    If you calculate the first few terms explicitly, you will find that the $n$th term is the sum of an exponential and a geometric series. For example,



    $$
    X_3 = 4^3 + 5(4^2+4+1).
    $$
    So in general,
    $$
    X_n = 4^n + 5sum_{k=0}^{n-1}4^k = 4^n +5frac{1-4^n}{1-4},
    $$



    which should simplify to the answer you gave.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Okay, that makes sense. But it looks like a different solution then from what is written in my textbook?
      $endgroup$
      – ponikoli
      Dec 15 '18 at 16:18














    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    If you calculate the first few terms explicitly, you will find that the $n$th term is the sum of an exponential and a geometric series. For example,



    $$
    X_3 = 4^3 + 5(4^2+4+1).
    $$
    So in general,
    $$
    X_n = 4^n + 5sum_{k=0}^{n-1}4^k = 4^n +5frac{1-4^n}{1-4},
    $$



    which should simplify to the answer you gave.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    If you calculate the first few terms explicitly, you will find that the $n$th term is the sum of an exponential and a geometric series. For example,



    $$
    X_3 = 4^3 + 5(4^2+4+1).
    $$
    So in general,
    $$
    X_n = 4^n + 5sum_{k=0}^{n-1}4^k = 4^n +5frac{1-4^n}{1-4},
    $$



    which should simplify to the answer you gave.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Dec 15 '18 at 16:04









    MatthiasMatthias

    3287




    3287












    • $begingroup$
      Okay, that makes sense. But it looks like a different solution then from what is written in my textbook?
      $endgroup$
      – ponikoli
      Dec 15 '18 at 16:18


















    • $begingroup$
      Okay, that makes sense. But it looks like a different solution then from what is written in my textbook?
      $endgroup$
      – ponikoli
      Dec 15 '18 at 16:18
















    $begingroup$
    Okay, that makes sense. But it looks like a different solution then from what is written in my textbook?
    $endgroup$
    – ponikoli
    Dec 15 '18 at 16:18




    $begingroup$
    Okay, that makes sense. But it looks like a different solution then from what is written in my textbook?
    $endgroup$
    – ponikoli
    Dec 15 '18 at 16:18











    0












    $begingroup$

    Let $x_m=y_m+aimplies y_0=x_0-a=1-a$



    $$5=x_n-4x_{n-1}=y_n+a-4(y_{m-1}+a)=y_n-4y_{n-1}-3a$$



    Set $-3a=5iff a=?$ so that $y_n=4y_{n-1}=cdots=4^ry_{n-r},0le rle n$



    $r=nimplies y_n=4^ny_0=4^n(1-a)$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Let $x_m=y_m+aimplies y_0=x_0-a=1-a$



      $$5=x_n-4x_{n-1}=y_n+a-4(y_{m-1}+a)=y_n-4y_{n-1}-3a$$



      Set $-3a=5iff a=?$ so that $y_n=4y_{n-1}=cdots=4^ry_{n-r},0le rle n$



      $r=nimplies y_n=4^ny_0=4^n(1-a)$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Let $x_m=y_m+aimplies y_0=x_0-a=1-a$



        $$5=x_n-4x_{n-1}=y_n+a-4(y_{m-1}+a)=y_n-4y_{n-1}-3a$$



        Set $-3a=5iff a=?$ so that $y_n=4y_{n-1}=cdots=4^ry_{n-r},0le rle n$



        $r=nimplies y_n=4^ny_0=4^n(1-a)$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Let $x_m=y_m+aimplies y_0=x_0-a=1-a$



        $$5=x_n-4x_{n-1}=y_n+a-4(y_{m-1}+a)=y_n-4y_{n-1}-3a$$



        Set $-3a=5iff a=?$ so that $y_n=4y_{n-1}=cdots=4^ry_{n-r},0le rle n$



        $r=nimplies y_n=4^ny_0=4^n(1-a)$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 15 '18 at 16:14









        lab bhattacharjeelab bhattacharjee

        226k15157275




        226k15157275























            -1












            $begingroup$

            This is a difference equation and it can be solved using Z-Transform. Take Z-transform of both sides of the equation and then use the initial condition. Ultimately, you will get Z-transform of X and then take its inverse z-transform to get the solution.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              The loooong road.
              $endgroup$
              – Did
              Dec 17 '18 at 0:31
















            -1












            $begingroup$

            This is a difference equation and it can be solved using Z-Transform. Take Z-transform of both sides of the equation and then use the initial condition. Ultimately, you will get Z-transform of X and then take its inverse z-transform to get the solution.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              The loooong road.
              $endgroup$
              – Did
              Dec 17 '18 at 0:31














            -1












            -1








            -1





            $begingroup$

            This is a difference equation and it can be solved using Z-Transform. Take Z-transform of both sides of the equation and then use the initial condition. Ultimately, you will get Z-transform of X and then take its inverse z-transform to get the solution.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            This is a difference equation and it can be solved using Z-Transform. Take Z-transform of both sides of the equation and then use the initial condition. Ultimately, you will get Z-transform of X and then take its inverse z-transform to get the solution.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 15 '18 at 15:53









            Asit SrivastavaAsit Srivastava

            257




            257












            • $begingroup$
              The loooong road.
              $endgroup$
              – Did
              Dec 17 '18 at 0:31


















            • $begingroup$
              The loooong road.
              $endgroup$
              – Did
              Dec 17 '18 at 0:31
















            $begingroup$
            The loooong road.
            $endgroup$
            – Did
            Dec 17 '18 at 0:31




            $begingroup$
            The loooong road.
            $endgroup$
            – Did
            Dec 17 '18 at 0:31


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3041632%2fsolving-recurrence-x-n-4x-n-15%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Image
            Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
            Read more

            Verónica Boquete

            Image
            Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
            Read more

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

            Image
            Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
            Read more