A question about a possible solution to A5 from Putnam 2018
$begingroup$
Can the following function exist: a smooth function $f:Bbb{R}toBbb{R}$ satisfies the following condition: $f^{(n)}(0)=0$ for all $n$, but there exists a sequence of points $x_nto 0$ such that $f^{(n)}(x_n)toinfty$. This is in reference to problem A5 of Putnam 2018. If I can prove that such a function cannot exist, I will have proved the Putnam problem.
real-analysis contest-math
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can the following function exist: a smooth function $f:Bbb{R}toBbb{R}$ satisfies the following condition: $f^{(n)}(0)=0$ for all $n$, but there exists a sequence of points $x_nto 0$ such that $f^{(n)}(x_n)toinfty$. This is in reference to problem A5 of Putnam 2018. If I can prove that such a function cannot exist, I will have proved the Putnam problem.
real-analysis contest-math
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can the following function exist: a smooth function $f:Bbb{R}toBbb{R}$ satisfies the following condition: $f^{(n)}(0)=0$ for all $n$, but there exists a sequence of points $x_nto 0$ such that $f^{(n)}(x_n)toinfty$. This is in reference to problem A5 of Putnam 2018. If I can prove that such a function cannot exist, I will have proved the Putnam problem.
real-analysis contest-math
$endgroup$
Can the following function exist: a smooth function $f:Bbb{R}toBbb{R}$ satisfies the following condition: $f^{(n)}(0)=0$ for all $n$, but there exists a sequence of points $x_nto 0$ such that $f^{(n)}(x_n)toinfty$. This is in reference to problem A5 of Putnam 2018. If I can prove that such a function cannot exist, I will have proved the Putnam problem.
real-analysis contest-math
real-analysis contest-math
edited Dec 24 '18 at 15:54
fierydemon
asked Dec 24 '18 at 15:35
fierydemonfierydemon
4,59522259
4,59522259
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Take any $C^infty$ function $f$ such that all $f^{(n)}(0) = 0$ but
$f(x) > 0$ for $x > 0$; a standard example is
$$ f(x) = cases{exp(-1/x) & if $x ge 0$cr
0 & if $x le 0$} $$
Note that for $x > 0$ and all positive integers $n$,
$$ f(x) = int_0^x frac{(x-s)^n}{n!} f^{(n+1)}(s); ds $$
as can be seen using integration by parts.
Now $|x-s|^n/n! le x^n/n! to 0$ as $n to infty$, so there must be
$x_n in (0,x)$ with $f^{(n+1)}(x_n) ge f(x) n!/x^n$.
For each $n$, take $y_n > 0$ so that $f(y_n) n!/y_n^n = n f(1)$. We have $y_n to 0+$
as $n to infty$, because $f(x) n!/x^n to infty$ for any fixed $x$. Then taking $x = y_n$ in the previous paragraph, we get $x_n in (0, y_n)$ with $f^{(n+1)}(x_n) ge n f(1)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Just confirming, you're saying that such a smooth function can exist, and that there is no contradiction?
$endgroup$
– fierydemon
Dec 24 '18 at 16:49
$begingroup$
Yes, it exists.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 24 '18 at 18:06
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051364%2fa-question-about-a-possible-solution-to-a5-from-putnam-2018%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Take any $C^infty$ function $f$ such that all $f^{(n)}(0) = 0$ but
$f(x) > 0$ for $x > 0$; a standard example is
$$ f(x) = cases{exp(-1/x) & if $x ge 0$cr
0 & if $x le 0$} $$
Note that for $x > 0$ and all positive integers $n$,
$$ f(x) = int_0^x frac{(x-s)^n}{n!} f^{(n+1)}(s); ds $$
as can be seen using integration by parts.
Now $|x-s|^n/n! le x^n/n! to 0$ as $n to infty$, so there must be
$x_n in (0,x)$ with $f^{(n+1)}(x_n) ge f(x) n!/x^n$.
For each $n$, take $y_n > 0$ so that $f(y_n) n!/y_n^n = n f(1)$. We have $y_n to 0+$
as $n to infty$, because $f(x) n!/x^n to infty$ for any fixed $x$. Then taking $x = y_n$ in the previous paragraph, we get $x_n in (0, y_n)$ with $f^{(n+1)}(x_n) ge n f(1)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Just confirming, you're saying that such a smooth function can exist, and that there is no contradiction?
$endgroup$
– fierydemon
Dec 24 '18 at 16:49
$begingroup$
Yes, it exists.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 24 '18 at 18:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take any $C^infty$ function $f$ such that all $f^{(n)}(0) = 0$ but
$f(x) > 0$ for $x > 0$; a standard example is
$$ f(x) = cases{exp(-1/x) & if $x ge 0$cr
0 & if $x le 0$} $$
Note that for $x > 0$ and all positive integers $n$,
$$ f(x) = int_0^x frac{(x-s)^n}{n!} f^{(n+1)}(s); ds $$
as can be seen using integration by parts.
Now $|x-s|^n/n! le x^n/n! to 0$ as $n to infty$, so there must be
$x_n in (0,x)$ with $f^{(n+1)}(x_n) ge f(x) n!/x^n$.
For each $n$, take $y_n > 0$ so that $f(y_n) n!/y_n^n = n f(1)$. We have $y_n to 0+$
as $n to infty$, because $f(x) n!/x^n to infty$ for any fixed $x$. Then taking $x = y_n$ in the previous paragraph, we get $x_n in (0, y_n)$ with $f^{(n+1)}(x_n) ge n f(1)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Just confirming, you're saying that such a smooth function can exist, and that there is no contradiction?
$endgroup$
– fierydemon
Dec 24 '18 at 16:49
$begingroup$
Yes, it exists.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 24 '18 at 18:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take any $C^infty$ function $f$ such that all $f^{(n)}(0) = 0$ but
$f(x) > 0$ for $x > 0$; a standard example is
$$ f(x) = cases{exp(-1/x) & if $x ge 0$cr
0 & if $x le 0$} $$
Note that for $x > 0$ and all positive integers $n$,
$$ f(x) = int_0^x frac{(x-s)^n}{n!} f^{(n+1)}(s); ds $$
as can be seen using integration by parts.
Now $|x-s|^n/n! le x^n/n! to 0$ as $n to infty$, so there must be
$x_n in (0,x)$ with $f^{(n+1)}(x_n) ge f(x) n!/x^n$.
For each $n$, take $y_n > 0$ so that $f(y_n) n!/y_n^n = n f(1)$. We have $y_n to 0+$
as $n to infty$, because $f(x) n!/x^n to infty$ for any fixed $x$. Then taking $x = y_n$ in the previous paragraph, we get $x_n in (0, y_n)$ with $f^{(n+1)}(x_n) ge n f(1)$.
$endgroup$
Take any $C^infty$ function $f$ such that all $f^{(n)}(0) = 0$ but
$f(x) > 0$ for $x > 0$; a standard example is
$$ f(x) = cases{exp(-1/x) & if $x ge 0$cr
0 & if $x le 0$} $$
Note that for $x > 0$ and all positive integers $n$,
$$ f(x) = int_0^x frac{(x-s)^n}{n!} f^{(n+1)}(s); ds $$
as can be seen using integration by parts.
Now $|x-s|^n/n! le x^n/n! to 0$ as $n to infty$, so there must be
$x_n in (0,x)$ with $f^{(n+1)}(x_n) ge f(x) n!/x^n$.
For each $n$, take $y_n > 0$ so that $f(y_n) n!/y_n^n = n f(1)$. We have $y_n to 0+$
as $n to infty$, because $f(x) n!/x^n to infty$ for any fixed $x$. Then taking $x = y_n$ in the previous paragraph, we get $x_n in (0, y_n)$ with $f^{(n+1)}(x_n) ge n f(1)$.
answered Dec 24 '18 at 16:42
Robert IsraelRobert Israel
330k23219473
330k23219473
$begingroup$
Just confirming, you're saying that such a smooth function can exist, and that there is no contradiction?
$endgroup$
– fierydemon
Dec 24 '18 at 16:49
$begingroup$
Yes, it exists.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 24 '18 at 18:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just confirming, you're saying that such a smooth function can exist, and that there is no contradiction?
$endgroup$
– fierydemon
Dec 24 '18 at 16:49
$begingroup$
Yes, it exists.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 24 '18 at 18:06
$begingroup$
Just confirming, you're saying that such a smooth function can exist, and that there is no contradiction?
$endgroup$
– fierydemon
Dec 24 '18 at 16:49
$begingroup$
Just confirming, you're saying that such a smooth function can exist, and that there is no contradiction?
$endgroup$
– fierydemon
Dec 24 '18 at 16:49
$begingroup$
Yes, it exists.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 24 '18 at 18:06
$begingroup$
Yes, it exists.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 24 '18 at 18:06
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051364%2fa-question-about-a-possible-solution-to-a5-from-putnam-2018%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown