If people had hollow bones to enable flight how would you design armour to protect them?












17












$begingroup$


A race in my novel have hollow bones to allow for flight. The character that belongs to this race is a warrior. It would be very easy to break bones simply by punching a fighter of this race. Is there anything I should focus on when designing her armour? Anything different to normal?






biology armors







share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Have you worked out what sort of weaponry her people usually use? Armor (like most aspects of combat) doesn't develop in a vacuum; it's shaped by the weapons and techniques it's expected to compete with.
    $endgroup$
    – Cadence
    Dec 24 '18 at 12:38






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Weight! If they have wings then the back must be exposed, plus sufficient give in the front to allow free muscle movement. Does your warrior have arms in addition to the wings or do we need a new way to put the armour on?
    $endgroup$
    – nzaman
    Dec 24 '18 at 12:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Such a race would do everything in their power to avoid warrior-like combat. At best you would make use of their light weight and train a stealth rogue since an archer would probably have their forearms broken by the sheer power of a bow's string. Even with great armor a simple kick to the chest would result in many broken ribs and then additional broken bones when the warrior falls on the ground. They will snap bones in their joints upon slamming their sword into another warrior's armor or shield. Their strength lies in dodging attacks so you should optimize their dexterity, not hinder it.
    $endgroup$
    – MonkeyZeus
    Dec 24 '18 at 16:40








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Note that bones of birds are not easy to break. The point of hollow tube is that it offers excellent strength-to-weight ratio. They are lighter, but not weaker.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    Dec 24 '18 at 23:17






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    holow bones alone do not allow a humanoid to fly. you'd need to massively redesign the body plan. just focusing on a single characteristic can't give any sensibel answers.
    $endgroup$
    – ths
    Dec 25 '18 at 19:35
















17












$begingroup$


A race in my novel have hollow bones to allow for flight. The character that belongs to this race is a warrior. It would be very easy to break bones simply by punching a fighter of this race. Is there anything I should focus on when designing her armour? Anything different to normal?






biology armors







share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Have you worked out what sort of weaponry her people usually use? Armor (like most aspects of combat) doesn't develop in a vacuum; it's shaped by the weapons and techniques it's expected to compete with.
    $endgroup$
    – Cadence
    Dec 24 '18 at 12:38






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Weight! If they have wings then the back must be exposed, plus sufficient give in the front to allow free muscle movement. Does your warrior have arms in addition to the wings or do we need a new way to put the armour on?
    $endgroup$
    – nzaman
    Dec 24 '18 at 12:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Such a race would do everything in their power to avoid warrior-like combat. At best you would make use of their light weight and train a stealth rogue since an archer would probably have their forearms broken by the sheer power of a bow's string. Even with great armor a simple kick to the chest would result in many broken ribs and then additional broken bones when the warrior falls on the ground. They will snap bones in their joints upon slamming their sword into another warrior's armor or shield. Their strength lies in dodging attacks so you should optimize their dexterity, not hinder it.
    $endgroup$
    – MonkeyZeus
    Dec 24 '18 at 16:40








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Note that bones of birds are not easy to break. The point of hollow tube is that it offers excellent strength-to-weight ratio. They are lighter, but not weaker.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    Dec 24 '18 at 23:17






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    holow bones alone do not allow a humanoid to fly. you'd need to massively redesign the body plan. just focusing on a single characteristic can't give any sensibel answers.
    $endgroup$
    – ths
    Dec 25 '18 at 19:35














17












17








17


1



$begingroup$


A race in my novel have hollow bones to allow for flight. The character that belongs to this race is a warrior. It would be very easy to break bones simply by punching a fighter of this race. Is there anything I should focus on when designing her armour? Anything different to normal?






biology armors







share|improve this question









$endgroup$




A race in my novel have hollow bones to allow for flight. The character that belongs to this race is a warrior. It would be very easy to break bones simply by punching a fighter of this race. Is there anything I should focus on when designing her armour? Anything different to normal?






biology armors




biology armors






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 24 '18 at 12:14









thelonelywriterthelonelywriter

1376




1376








  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Have you worked out what sort of weaponry her people usually use? Armor (like most aspects of combat) doesn't develop in a vacuum; it's shaped by the weapons and techniques it's expected to compete with.
    $endgroup$
    – Cadence
    Dec 24 '18 at 12:38






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Weight! If they have wings then the back must be exposed, plus sufficient give in the front to allow free muscle movement. Does your warrior have arms in addition to the wings or do we need a new way to put the armour on?
    $endgroup$
    – nzaman
    Dec 24 '18 at 12:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Such a race would do everything in their power to avoid warrior-like combat. At best you would make use of their light weight and train a stealth rogue since an archer would probably have their forearms broken by the sheer power of a bow's string. Even with great armor a simple kick to the chest would result in many broken ribs and then additional broken bones when the warrior falls on the ground. They will snap bones in their joints upon slamming their sword into another warrior's armor or shield. Their strength lies in dodging attacks so you should optimize their dexterity, not hinder it.
    $endgroup$
    – MonkeyZeus
    Dec 24 '18 at 16:40








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Note that bones of birds are not easy to break. The point of hollow tube is that it offers excellent strength-to-weight ratio. They are lighter, but not weaker.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    Dec 24 '18 at 23:17






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    holow bones alone do not allow a humanoid to fly. you'd need to massively redesign the body plan. just focusing on a single characteristic can't give any sensibel answers.
    $endgroup$
    – ths
    Dec 25 '18 at 19:35














  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Have you worked out what sort of weaponry her people usually use? Armor (like most aspects of combat) doesn't develop in a vacuum; it's shaped by the weapons and techniques it's expected to compete with.
    $endgroup$
    – Cadence
    Dec 24 '18 at 12:38






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Weight! If they have wings then the back must be exposed, plus sufficient give in the front to allow free muscle movement. Does your warrior have arms in addition to the wings or do we need a new way to put the armour on?
    $endgroup$
    – nzaman
    Dec 24 '18 at 12:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Such a race would do everything in their power to avoid warrior-like combat. At best you would make use of their light weight and train a stealth rogue since an archer would probably have their forearms broken by the sheer power of a bow's string. Even with great armor a simple kick to the chest would result in many broken ribs and then additional broken bones when the warrior falls on the ground. They will snap bones in their joints upon slamming their sword into another warrior's armor or shield. Their strength lies in dodging attacks so you should optimize their dexterity, not hinder it.
    $endgroup$
    – MonkeyZeus
    Dec 24 '18 at 16:40








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Note that bones of birds are not easy to break. The point of hollow tube is that it offers excellent strength-to-weight ratio. They are lighter, but not weaker.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    Dec 24 '18 at 23:17






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    holow bones alone do not allow a humanoid to fly. you'd need to massively redesign the body plan. just focusing on a single characteristic can't give any sensibel answers.
    $endgroup$
    – ths
    Dec 25 '18 at 19:35








10




10




$begingroup$
Have you worked out what sort of weaponry her people usually use? Armor (like most aspects of combat) doesn't develop in a vacuum; it's shaped by the weapons and techniques it's expected to compete with.
$endgroup$
– Cadence
Dec 24 '18 at 12:38




$begingroup$
Have you worked out what sort of weaponry her people usually use? Armor (like most aspects of combat) doesn't develop in a vacuum; it's shaped by the weapons and techniques it's expected to compete with.
$endgroup$
– Cadence
Dec 24 '18 at 12:38




4




4




$begingroup$
Weight! If they have wings then the back must be exposed, plus sufficient give in the front to allow free muscle movement. Does your warrior have arms in addition to the wings or do we need a new way to put the armour on?
$endgroup$
– nzaman
Dec 24 '18 at 12:46




$begingroup$
Weight! If they have wings then the back must be exposed, plus sufficient give in the front to allow free muscle movement. Does your warrior have arms in addition to the wings or do we need a new way to put the armour on?
$endgroup$
– nzaman
Dec 24 '18 at 12:46




1




1




$begingroup$
Such a race would do everything in their power to avoid warrior-like combat. At best you would make use of their light weight and train a stealth rogue since an archer would probably have their forearms broken by the sheer power of a bow's string. Even with great armor a simple kick to the chest would result in many broken ribs and then additional broken bones when the warrior falls on the ground. They will snap bones in their joints upon slamming their sword into another warrior's armor or shield. Their strength lies in dodging attacks so you should optimize their dexterity, not hinder it.
$endgroup$
– MonkeyZeus
Dec 24 '18 at 16:40






$begingroup$
Such a race would do everything in their power to avoid warrior-like combat. At best you would make use of their light weight and train a stealth rogue since an archer would probably have their forearms broken by the sheer power of a bow's string. Even with great armor a simple kick to the chest would result in many broken ribs and then additional broken bones when the warrior falls on the ground. They will snap bones in their joints upon slamming their sword into another warrior's armor or shield. Their strength lies in dodging attacks so you should optimize their dexterity, not hinder it.
$endgroup$
– MonkeyZeus
Dec 24 '18 at 16:40






5




5




$begingroup$
Note that bones of birds are not easy to break. The point of hollow tube is that it offers excellent strength-to-weight ratio. They are lighter, but not weaker.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
Dec 24 '18 at 23:17




$begingroup$
Note that bones of birds are not easy to break. The point of hollow tube is that it offers excellent strength-to-weight ratio. They are lighter, but not weaker.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
Dec 24 '18 at 23:17




2




2




$begingroup$
holow bones alone do not allow a humanoid to fly. you'd need to massively redesign the body plan. just focusing on a single characteristic can't give any sensibel answers.
$endgroup$
– ths
Dec 25 '18 at 19:35




$begingroup$
holow bones alone do not allow a humanoid to fly. you'd need to massively redesign the body plan. just focusing on a single characteristic can't give any sensibel answers.
$endgroup$
– ths
Dec 25 '18 at 19:35










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















16












$begingroup$

Traditional armour is completely out. Not only would it be too heavy, it's also going to restrict agility too much. I assume that for flight these race need to be extremely flexible.



Does the race actually have wings that need protecting too? Wings have a very wide surface area, and are very fragile with very few fixing points - which would make them a pain to try and protect. Maybe you could fasten a 'sheathe' of chainmail over a wing, but it probably wouldn't do much good and it would likely interfere with flight.



Their wings would definitely be the most vunerable part of the body.



In battle, the biggest concern will be arrows, and it takes a lot of metal to properly stop an arrow. A longbow can pierce even a solid breastplate, so whatever the flying creatures are wearing isn't going to do much good.



Instead, I would consider alternative types of protection; cloth armour. Wear robes instead of plate armour.



Rather that trying to protect certain areas, maybe try to obscure them. I'm imagining large billows of silk cloth, in which the shape of body can hide. Make it more awkward for any attacker to take aim. If the cloth billows enough, it might even knock an arrow off-course before it pierces flesh.



Wearing long cloaks when flying above an enemy is going to have an intimidating effect too; it'll make yourself seem larger and more threatening.



Layers of billowing cloth would be the way to go. Make it as light as possible - silk, if possible. Wear it as cloak and hood, and attach sheets to trail from the wings. If the cloth is very fluffy, it's going to work to disrupt any attacker. To hinder them, rather than stop.



Make sure that the cloth is easily detachable too, so you can drop it to entangle your opponent, without risking it entangling you.



Underneath the cloth, wear very slim hard leather bandings and a helm to protect the really important stuff; organs and face.



It's not going to 'stop' much, and the flyers will still be more vunerable to any impact, but it will help in other ways.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Billowing cloth "armour" would be enhanced by use of cloud and sky camouflage colours.
    $endgroup$
    – elemtilas
    Dec 24 '18 at 15:05






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Large swathes of billowing cloth are going to get in the way of the wings (imagine them plummeting to the ground with a wing tangled in it) & interfere with flight even when it doesn't, especially on blustery days, the last thing you'll want if you have wings is bunches of loose flapping cloth tied to you, even something safe from tangling like one of those baggy indoor free fall suits will cut down on airspeed for a start : extra drag like that isn't something they'll want at all.
    $endgroup$
    – Pelinore
    Dec 24 '18 at 15:24












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, it wouldn't be comfortable, and you would have to tailor it ergonomically to the wings. The cloth would be designed to billow around the wings rather than interfere with them - so it would billow behind them as it flies, and it's light enough that it would get tangled. It would take some development. It would still add drag too. But for flyers, I would say it's their best option; they would have to focus on soft armour rather than hard armour.
    $endgroup$
    – Wyvern
    Dec 24 '18 at 15:28








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    ^ Which all makes no difference, any significant drag might drop them below a sustainable airspeed while any less significant drag will make them a slower (so easier) target, any gains will be more than lost to that, especially if they decide they're losing & need to run away from other flyers.
    $endgroup$
    – Pelinore
    Dec 24 '18 at 15:37








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Anything billowing is straight out, because it would produce insane amount of friction drag, which is just as bad as inducing drag by being heavy.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    Dec 24 '18 at 23:07





















8












$begingroup$

You can't think of infantry on the ground, but airplanes in the air



This race is no match for any other race on the ground. Their "infrastructure" simply won't allow them to wear the armor the other guy can wear. This is no different than an airplane, which is the proverbial sitting duck when caught on the ground.



This means your fighter must master combat in the air — and as we all know, air superiority is often the deciding factor in a war. So, let's think about airplanes for a moment.




  • Thin skin. Originally paper or a light fabric. Bullets could go right through it.

  • Light skeleton. Originally light wood. Flexible, but driving a car down a runway disabled every plane it touched. Note that modern jet fighters are more durable (the benefit of a much higher thrust-to-weight ratio), but a crazed jihadist driving a truck could still disable a lot of them before the truck was too banged up to disable more.

  • Sleek. Since the air is where they've gotta be, they need to reduce anything that keeps them out of the air. Low weight. Sleek skins. Flexibility. Etc. Anything that degrades flight performance is out.


So, what can we do about this? We need to preserve flexibility for flight, try to protect critical components (like the heart), and still leave some weight-carrying capacity available for things like the proverbial flower pot (we all know how deadly flower pots can be).




  • Most of the wings need no protection. An arrow through the feathers, or even the skin holding the feathers, really isn't that critical. It's the bones along the leading edge that need some help. I want you to think about the laquered bamboo armor of the Japanese Samurai. Layered strips of laquered bamboo that would shunt aside all but perfectly aimed arrows and stones. Remember, throwing missles into the air isn't as simple as it sounds. It doesn't sound like your opposing races have access to a Phalanx CIWS. You want and only need this light but semi-rigid armor along the leading edge and exposed-to-the-ground face of the bone. Being minimalist increases risk, but it also maximizes capability.


  • Rather than full armor, your birds will want armored patches principally protecting areas usually exposed to the ground. Forearm bracers covering the underside of the arm. Chest coverage and the forward areas of the legs' tibia and femur regions. You needn't worry so much about, e.g., the knee cap — that's a wailing good shot considering bird dude is zipping along and it's a small region. Again, we're trading risk for capability. This armor could be a stiffened leather to promote better flexibility. Your bird dudes will need all kinds of motion to control flight. Weight needs to be shifted more than for a person walking/running on the ground. Therefore, flexibility is a huge factor to worry about.


  • I wouldn't even worry about headwear. What sword would come down on the head of your bird dudes? If they're anywhere this could happen, they're not where they're supposed to be. Flying creatures depend on the ability to get away with speed, and intelligent flying creatures would depend on ranged attacks.



As you can see, if these guys get stuck on the ground their dead as door nails. But so are airplanes. The point is to keep them in the air. If you think about the flight of an arrow, it slows down as altitude increases to the point where vertical acceleration is zero. Your race would quickly develop skills for judging their altitude to minimize the risk, which is only great if they must descend for close-in combat. In that case, their friend is speed (and a lot of it).



The one kind of weapon (on a bit of a side note) that they don't want is a sword or club. Absolutely nothing that requires retaining their grip as each impact would add to the force slowing them down. Sabers worked great for calvary because horses are heavy and the weight-to-impact ratio was so high that the only issue was retaining your grip. Not so with bird dudes. They'll want things they can drop in a straffing run. Short javelins come to mind. So does some form of napalm. Yeah. Napalm.



I can envision a 2-man attack. The first comes in with enormous speed and drops a bucket of Greek Fire. The second drops a burning brand from a safe altitude. Some poor schmuck on the ground has the privilege of wetting his pants as he watches that brand gently fall... fall... fall... oh ra....






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Was right there with you until you suggested samurai-style lacquered wooden armor on the wings. That sounds much too heavy, and a thin strip as you describe is protecting an extremely small area—the odds of a projectile in such a small area seem too low to be worth trying (and failing) to protect it, when the cost is stamina, speed, and maneuverability.
    $endgroup$
    – KRyan
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:54








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @KRyan, it's not protecting against a projectile. When's the last time you hit a flying bird with a BB gun? It's there to guard against unintended impact from maneuvers.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Dec 25 '18 at 17:29










  • $begingroup$
    Hm, maybe—I suggest clarifying that in your answer, and maybe providing some numbers for the relative weight of that lacquer armor. I suspect it is not particularly lightweight, even compared to steel (which could presumably be thinner), and certainly not compared to stuff like aluminum or titanium (which, to be fair, may not be reasonable assumptions in this context).
    $endgroup$
    – KRyan
    Dec 26 '18 at 0:48










  • $begingroup$
    @KRyan, I have to admit that the OP didn't say anything about tech level and I automatically (and unconciously) assumed a fantasy setting - basically medieval. You make a good point about better materials at better tech levels... but there comes a point where the tech exceeds the value of your wings and there's no purpose to protecting them or yourself anymore. This needs clarification before I clarify my answer. I'll pester the OP.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Dec 26 '18 at 0:51



















6












$begingroup$

You would do it exactly the way birds do it: feathers. If you've ever dealt much with birds, you will probably have noticed that it's actually quite difficult to penetrate a layer of feathers. yet they're quite light. (And of course have benefits for flight, insulation, &c.)



Further, the claim that it would be easy to break bones doesn't stand up to examination. Bird bones evolved to be light and strong. Some birds, notably swans, defend their nests with blows from their wings, and can even (rarely) break the bones of a human: http://www.myswan.org.au/index.php/faqs/is-it-true-that-a-blow-from-a-swans-wing-can-break-bones/



That also contradicts the idea that a bird-boned race would avoid fighting. Many birds are predators, others will agressively defend their nests.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    6












    $begingroup$


    "If people had hollow bones to enable flight how would you design armour to protect them?"




    You wouldn't, any armor at all worthy of the name "armor" will reverse any of the advantages for flight that having hollow bones gave them in the first place.



    If they want to fly & fight they're most likely to just rely on speed, agility & dropping stuff from a great height (well above the range of enemy projectile weapons) onto their land-bound enemies.




    Any armor at all reduces their ability to carry larger payloads (weapons or missiles), so they're more likely to forgo any armor in exchange for being able to carry more rocks, or whatever it is they do carry to drop on those below.




    If any of them do wear any armor the light stiffened cloth armor (Linothorax) used by the ancient Greeks is going to be a good starting point, probably cut down even further to cover only the most vital areas & of course ensure free movement of the wings, it's actually pretty effective.




    Given their preferred technique for dealing with those who can't fly is most likely dropping stuff on their heads from on high any armor they do use is probably only worn for combat with others who also fly.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      Bamboo.



      bamboo armor
      https://www.pinterest.com/pin/148759593911433770/?lp=true



      Bamboo really has been used for armor. It would be great for your flying folk. It has several advantages.



      1: Light.



      2: Cheap.



      3: It can absorb impacts by breaking.



      4: It can catch a sharp incoming edge within itself rather than deflecting the energy elsewhere.



      5: The armor can be made modular - so pieces broken during one engagement can be swapped out for replacements.



      6: Looks awesome.




      1. Parts of the bamboo tubing could be left open. When your flying folk dive and attack, air would whistle across it. All of them diving together would be a scary noise.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$





















        0












        $begingroup$

        If your world is free to invent things that might not exist in ours, you could say there exists a type of metal lighter than the usual ones we use, say it's specific to the avian race's home/continent and have them develop it into all manner of armour.



        Alternatively, if your world has magic, another option is to magically imbue regular cloth and leather armour to make it more sturdy to attacks/impacts and provide greater flexibility for flight/stealth/quick dashes in and out of a fight.



        One thing that definitely changes how to design armour is whether the avian race has wings and what type of wings are most common, are there perhaps multiple pairs of wings, can they be hidden. Having an opening for wings provides another weak point in ones armour and makes flanking more dangerous, but also you have to take into account how to make the openings flexible enough not to hinder flight.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$














          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "579"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134663%2fif-people-had-hollow-bones-to-enable-flight-how-would-you-design-armour-to-prote%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes








          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          16












          $begingroup$

          Traditional armour is completely out. Not only would it be too heavy, it's also going to restrict agility too much. I assume that for flight these race need to be extremely flexible.



          Does the race actually have wings that need protecting too? Wings have a very wide surface area, and are very fragile with very few fixing points - which would make them a pain to try and protect. Maybe you could fasten a 'sheathe' of chainmail over a wing, but it probably wouldn't do much good and it would likely interfere with flight.



          Their wings would definitely be the most vunerable part of the body.



          In battle, the biggest concern will be arrows, and it takes a lot of metal to properly stop an arrow. A longbow can pierce even a solid breastplate, so whatever the flying creatures are wearing isn't going to do much good.



          Instead, I would consider alternative types of protection; cloth armour. Wear robes instead of plate armour.



          Rather that trying to protect certain areas, maybe try to obscure them. I'm imagining large billows of silk cloth, in which the shape of body can hide. Make it more awkward for any attacker to take aim. If the cloth billows enough, it might even knock an arrow off-course before it pierces flesh.



          Wearing long cloaks when flying above an enemy is going to have an intimidating effect too; it'll make yourself seem larger and more threatening.



          Layers of billowing cloth would be the way to go. Make it as light as possible - silk, if possible. Wear it as cloak and hood, and attach sheets to trail from the wings. If the cloth is very fluffy, it's going to work to disrupt any attacker. To hinder them, rather than stop.



          Make sure that the cloth is easily detachable too, so you can drop it to entangle your opponent, without risking it entangling you.



          Underneath the cloth, wear very slim hard leather bandings and a helm to protect the really important stuff; organs and face.



          It's not going to 'stop' much, and the flyers will still be more vunerable to any impact, but it will help in other ways.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Billowing cloth "armour" would be enhanced by use of cloud and sky camouflage colours.
            $endgroup$
            – elemtilas
            Dec 24 '18 at 15:05






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Large swathes of billowing cloth are going to get in the way of the wings (imagine them plummeting to the ground with a wing tangled in it) & interfere with flight even when it doesn't, especially on blustery days, the last thing you'll want if you have wings is bunches of loose flapping cloth tied to you, even something safe from tangling like one of those baggy indoor free fall suits will cut down on airspeed for a start : extra drag like that isn't something they'll want at all.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            Dec 24 '18 at 15:24












          • $begingroup$
            Oh, it wouldn't be comfortable, and you would have to tailor it ergonomically to the wings. The cloth would be designed to billow around the wings rather than interfere with them - so it would billow behind them as it flies, and it's light enough that it would get tangled. It would take some development. It would still add drag too. But for flyers, I would say it's their best option; they would have to focus on soft armour rather than hard armour.
            $endgroup$
            – Wyvern
            Dec 24 '18 at 15:28








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            ^ Which all makes no difference, any significant drag might drop them below a sustainable airspeed while any less significant drag will make them a slower (so easier) target, any gains will be more than lost to that, especially if they decide they're losing & need to run away from other flyers.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            Dec 24 '18 at 15:37








          • 3




            $begingroup$
            Anything billowing is straight out, because it would produce insane amount of friction drag, which is just as bad as inducing drag by being heavy.
            $endgroup$
            – Jan Hudec
            Dec 24 '18 at 23:07


















          16












          $begingroup$

          Traditional armour is completely out. Not only would it be too heavy, it's also going to restrict agility too much. I assume that for flight these race need to be extremely flexible.



          Does the race actually have wings that need protecting too? Wings have a very wide surface area, and are very fragile with very few fixing points - which would make them a pain to try and protect. Maybe you could fasten a 'sheathe' of chainmail over a wing, but it probably wouldn't do much good and it would likely interfere with flight.



          Their wings would definitely be the most vunerable part of the body.



          In battle, the biggest concern will be arrows, and it takes a lot of metal to properly stop an arrow. A longbow can pierce even a solid breastplate, so whatever the flying creatures are wearing isn't going to do much good.



          Instead, I would consider alternative types of protection; cloth armour. Wear robes instead of plate armour.



          Rather that trying to protect certain areas, maybe try to obscure them. I'm imagining large billows of silk cloth, in which the shape of body can hide. Make it more awkward for any attacker to take aim. If the cloth billows enough, it might even knock an arrow off-course before it pierces flesh.



          Wearing long cloaks when flying above an enemy is going to have an intimidating effect too; it'll make yourself seem larger and more threatening.



          Layers of billowing cloth would be the way to go. Make it as light as possible - silk, if possible. Wear it as cloak and hood, and attach sheets to trail from the wings. If the cloth is very fluffy, it's going to work to disrupt any attacker. To hinder them, rather than stop.



          Make sure that the cloth is easily detachable too, so you can drop it to entangle your opponent, without risking it entangling you.



          Underneath the cloth, wear very slim hard leather bandings and a helm to protect the really important stuff; organs and face.



          It's not going to 'stop' much, and the flyers will still be more vunerable to any impact, but it will help in other ways.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Billowing cloth "armour" would be enhanced by use of cloud and sky camouflage colours.
            $endgroup$
            – elemtilas
            Dec 24 '18 at 15:05






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Large swathes of billowing cloth are going to get in the way of the wings (imagine them plummeting to the ground with a wing tangled in it) & interfere with flight even when it doesn't, especially on blustery days, the last thing you'll want if you have wings is bunches of loose flapping cloth tied to you, even something safe from tangling like one of those baggy indoor free fall suits will cut down on airspeed for a start : extra drag like that isn't something they'll want at all.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            Dec 24 '18 at 15:24












          • $begingroup$
            Oh, it wouldn't be comfortable, and you would have to tailor it ergonomically to the wings. The cloth would be designed to billow around the wings rather than interfere with them - so it would billow behind them as it flies, and it's light enough that it would get tangled. It would take some development. It would still add drag too. But for flyers, I would say it's their best option; they would have to focus on soft armour rather than hard armour.
            $endgroup$
            – Wyvern
            Dec 24 '18 at 15:28








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            ^ Which all makes no difference, any significant drag might drop them below a sustainable airspeed while any less significant drag will make them a slower (so easier) target, any gains will be more than lost to that, especially if they decide they're losing & need to run away from other flyers.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            Dec 24 '18 at 15:37








          • 3




            $begingroup$
            Anything billowing is straight out, because it would produce insane amount of friction drag, which is just as bad as inducing drag by being heavy.
            $endgroup$
            – Jan Hudec
            Dec 24 '18 at 23:07
















          16












          16








          16





          $begingroup$

          Traditional armour is completely out. Not only would it be too heavy, it's also going to restrict agility too much. I assume that for flight these race need to be extremely flexible.



          Does the race actually have wings that need protecting too? Wings have a very wide surface area, and are very fragile with very few fixing points - which would make them a pain to try and protect. Maybe you could fasten a 'sheathe' of chainmail over a wing, but it probably wouldn't do much good and it would likely interfere with flight.



          Their wings would definitely be the most vunerable part of the body.



          In battle, the biggest concern will be arrows, and it takes a lot of metal to properly stop an arrow. A longbow can pierce even a solid breastplate, so whatever the flying creatures are wearing isn't going to do much good.



          Instead, I would consider alternative types of protection; cloth armour. Wear robes instead of plate armour.



          Rather that trying to protect certain areas, maybe try to obscure them. I'm imagining large billows of silk cloth, in which the shape of body can hide. Make it more awkward for any attacker to take aim. If the cloth billows enough, it might even knock an arrow off-course before it pierces flesh.



          Wearing long cloaks when flying above an enemy is going to have an intimidating effect too; it'll make yourself seem larger and more threatening.



          Layers of billowing cloth would be the way to go. Make it as light as possible - silk, if possible. Wear it as cloak and hood, and attach sheets to trail from the wings. If the cloth is very fluffy, it's going to work to disrupt any attacker. To hinder them, rather than stop.



          Make sure that the cloth is easily detachable too, so you can drop it to entangle your opponent, without risking it entangling you.



          Underneath the cloth, wear very slim hard leather bandings and a helm to protect the really important stuff; organs and face.



          It's not going to 'stop' much, and the flyers will still be more vunerable to any impact, but it will help in other ways.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Traditional armour is completely out. Not only would it be too heavy, it's also going to restrict agility too much. I assume that for flight these race need to be extremely flexible.



          Does the race actually have wings that need protecting too? Wings have a very wide surface area, and are very fragile with very few fixing points - which would make them a pain to try and protect. Maybe you could fasten a 'sheathe' of chainmail over a wing, but it probably wouldn't do much good and it would likely interfere with flight.



          Their wings would definitely be the most vunerable part of the body.



          In battle, the biggest concern will be arrows, and it takes a lot of metal to properly stop an arrow. A longbow can pierce even a solid breastplate, so whatever the flying creatures are wearing isn't going to do much good.



          Instead, I would consider alternative types of protection; cloth armour. Wear robes instead of plate armour.



          Rather that trying to protect certain areas, maybe try to obscure them. I'm imagining large billows of silk cloth, in which the shape of body can hide. Make it more awkward for any attacker to take aim. If the cloth billows enough, it might even knock an arrow off-course before it pierces flesh.



          Wearing long cloaks when flying above an enemy is going to have an intimidating effect too; it'll make yourself seem larger and more threatening.



          Layers of billowing cloth would be the way to go. Make it as light as possible - silk, if possible. Wear it as cloak and hood, and attach sheets to trail from the wings. If the cloth is very fluffy, it's going to work to disrupt any attacker. To hinder them, rather than stop.



          Make sure that the cloth is easily detachable too, so you can drop it to entangle your opponent, without risking it entangling you.



          Underneath the cloth, wear very slim hard leather bandings and a helm to protect the really important stuff; organs and face.



          It's not going to 'stop' much, and the flyers will still be more vunerable to any impact, but it will help in other ways.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 24 '18 at 13:21

























          answered Dec 24 '18 at 12:58









          WyvernWyvern

          1,657523




          1,657523








          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Billowing cloth "armour" would be enhanced by use of cloud and sky camouflage colours.
            $endgroup$
            – elemtilas
            Dec 24 '18 at 15:05






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Large swathes of billowing cloth are going to get in the way of the wings (imagine them plummeting to the ground with a wing tangled in it) & interfere with flight even when it doesn't, especially on blustery days, the last thing you'll want if you have wings is bunches of loose flapping cloth tied to you, even something safe from tangling like one of those baggy indoor free fall suits will cut down on airspeed for a start : extra drag like that isn't something they'll want at all.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            Dec 24 '18 at 15:24












          • $begingroup$
            Oh, it wouldn't be comfortable, and you would have to tailor it ergonomically to the wings. The cloth would be designed to billow around the wings rather than interfere with them - so it would billow behind them as it flies, and it's light enough that it would get tangled. It would take some development. It would still add drag too. But for flyers, I would say it's their best option; they would have to focus on soft armour rather than hard armour.
            $endgroup$
            – Wyvern
            Dec 24 '18 at 15:28








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            ^ Which all makes no difference, any significant drag might drop them below a sustainable airspeed while any less significant drag will make them a slower (so easier) target, any gains will be more than lost to that, especially if they decide they're losing & need to run away from other flyers.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            Dec 24 '18 at 15:37








          • 3




            $begingroup$
            Anything billowing is straight out, because it would produce insane amount of friction drag, which is just as bad as inducing drag by being heavy.
            $endgroup$
            – Jan Hudec
            Dec 24 '18 at 23:07
















          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Billowing cloth "armour" would be enhanced by use of cloud and sky camouflage colours.
            $endgroup$
            – elemtilas
            Dec 24 '18 at 15:05






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Large swathes of billowing cloth are going to get in the way of the wings (imagine them plummeting to the ground with a wing tangled in it) & interfere with flight even when it doesn't, especially on blustery days, the last thing you'll want if you have wings is bunches of loose flapping cloth tied to you, even something safe from tangling like one of those baggy indoor free fall suits will cut down on airspeed for a start : extra drag like that isn't something they'll want at all.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            Dec 24 '18 at 15:24












          • $begingroup$
            Oh, it wouldn't be comfortable, and you would have to tailor it ergonomically to the wings. The cloth would be designed to billow around the wings rather than interfere with them - so it would billow behind them as it flies, and it's light enough that it would get tangled. It would take some development. It would still add drag too. But for flyers, I would say it's their best option; they would have to focus on soft armour rather than hard armour.
            $endgroup$
            – Wyvern
            Dec 24 '18 at 15:28








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            ^ Which all makes no difference, any significant drag might drop them below a sustainable airspeed while any less significant drag will make them a slower (so easier) target, any gains will be more than lost to that, especially if they decide they're losing & need to run away from other flyers.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            Dec 24 '18 at 15:37








          • 3




            $begingroup$
            Anything billowing is straight out, because it would produce insane amount of friction drag, which is just as bad as inducing drag by being heavy.
            $endgroup$
            – Jan Hudec
            Dec 24 '18 at 23:07










          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          Billowing cloth "armour" would be enhanced by use of cloud and sky camouflage colours.
          $endgroup$
          – elemtilas
          Dec 24 '18 at 15:05




          $begingroup$
          Billowing cloth "armour" would be enhanced by use of cloud and sky camouflage colours.
          $endgroup$
          – elemtilas
          Dec 24 '18 at 15:05




          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          Large swathes of billowing cloth are going to get in the way of the wings (imagine them plummeting to the ground with a wing tangled in it) & interfere with flight even when it doesn't, especially on blustery days, the last thing you'll want if you have wings is bunches of loose flapping cloth tied to you, even something safe from tangling like one of those baggy indoor free fall suits will cut down on airspeed for a start : extra drag like that isn't something they'll want at all.
          $endgroup$
          – Pelinore
          Dec 24 '18 at 15:24






          $begingroup$
          Large swathes of billowing cloth are going to get in the way of the wings (imagine them plummeting to the ground with a wing tangled in it) & interfere with flight even when it doesn't, especially on blustery days, the last thing you'll want if you have wings is bunches of loose flapping cloth tied to you, even something safe from tangling like one of those baggy indoor free fall suits will cut down on airspeed for a start : extra drag like that isn't something they'll want at all.
          $endgroup$
          – Pelinore
          Dec 24 '18 at 15:24














          $begingroup$
          Oh, it wouldn't be comfortable, and you would have to tailor it ergonomically to the wings. The cloth would be designed to billow around the wings rather than interfere with them - so it would billow behind them as it flies, and it's light enough that it would get tangled. It would take some development. It would still add drag too. But for flyers, I would say it's their best option; they would have to focus on soft armour rather than hard armour.
          $endgroup$
          – Wyvern
          Dec 24 '18 at 15:28






          $begingroup$
          Oh, it wouldn't be comfortable, and you would have to tailor it ergonomically to the wings. The cloth would be designed to billow around the wings rather than interfere with them - so it would billow behind them as it flies, and it's light enough that it would get tangled. It would take some development. It would still add drag too. But for flyers, I would say it's their best option; they would have to focus on soft armour rather than hard armour.
          $endgroup$
          – Wyvern
          Dec 24 '18 at 15:28






          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          ^ Which all makes no difference, any significant drag might drop them below a sustainable airspeed while any less significant drag will make them a slower (so easier) target, any gains will be more than lost to that, especially if they decide they're losing & need to run away from other flyers.
          $endgroup$
          – Pelinore
          Dec 24 '18 at 15:37






          $begingroup$
          ^ Which all makes no difference, any significant drag might drop them below a sustainable airspeed while any less significant drag will make them a slower (so easier) target, any gains will be more than lost to that, especially if they decide they're losing & need to run away from other flyers.
          $endgroup$
          – Pelinore
          Dec 24 '18 at 15:37






          3




          3




          $begingroup$
          Anything billowing is straight out, because it would produce insane amount of friction drag, which is just as bad as inducing drag by being heavy.
          $endgroup$
          – Jan Hudec
          Dec 24 '18 at 23:07






          $begingroup$
          Anything billowing is straight out, because it would produce insane amount of friction drag, which is just as bad as inducing drag by being heavy.
          $endgroup$
          – Jan Hudec
          Dec 24 '18 at 23:07













          8












          $begingroup$

          You can't think of infantry on the ground, but airplanes in the air



          This race is no match for any other race on the ground. Their "infrastructure" simply won't allow them to wear the armor the other guy can wear. This is no different than an airplane, which is the proverbial sitting duck when caught on the ground.



          This means your fighter must master combat in the air — and as we all know, air superiority is often the deciding factor in a war. So, let's think about airplanes for a moment.




          • Thin skin. Originally paper or a light fabric. Bullets could go right through it.

          • Light skeleton. Originally light wood. Flexible, but driving a car down a runway disabled every plane it touched. Note that modern jet fighters are more durable (the benefit of a much higher thrust-to-weight ratio), but a crazed jihadist driving a truck could still disable a lot of them before the truck was too banged up to disable more.

          • Sleek. Since the air is where they've gotta be, they need to reduce anything that keeps them out of the air. Low weight. Sleek skins. Flexibility. Etc. Anything that degrades flight performance is out.


          So, what can we do about this? We need to preserve flexibility for flight, try to protect critical components (like the heart), and still leave some weight-carrying capacity available for things like the proverbial flower pot (we all know how deadly flower pots can be).




          • Most of the wings need no protection. An arrow through the feathers, or even the skin holding the feathers, really isn't that critical. It's the bones along the leading edge that need some help. I want you to think about the laquered bamboo armor of the Japanese Samurai. Layered strips of laquered bamboo that would shunt aside all but perfectly aimed arrows and stones. Remember, throwing missles into the air isn't as simple as it sounds. It doesn't sound like your opposing races have access to a Phalanx CIWS. You want and only need this light but semi-rigid armor along the leading edge and exposed-to-the-ground face of the bone. Being minimalist increases risk, but it also maximizes capability.


          • Rather than full armor, your birds will want armored patches principally protecting areas usually exposed to the ground. Forearm bracers covering the underside of the arm. Chest coverage and the forward areas of the legs' tibia and femur regions. You needn't worry so much about, e.g., the knee cap — that's a wailing good shot considering bird dude is zipping along and it's a small region. Again, we're trading risk for capability. This armor could be a stiffened leather to promote better flexibility. Your bird dudes will need all kinds of motion to control flight. Weight needs to be shifted more than for a person walking/running on the ground. Therefore, flexibility is a huge factor to worry about.


          • I wouldn't even worry about headwear. What sword would come down on the head of your bird dudes? If they're anywhere this could happen, they're not where they're supposed to be. Flying creatures depend on the ability to get away with speed, and intelligent flying creatures would depend on ranged attacks.



          As you can see, if these guys get stuck on the ground their dead as door nails. But so are airplanes. The point is to keep them in the air. If you think about the flight of an arrow, it slows down as altitude increases to the point where vertical acceleration is zero. Your race would quickly develop skills for judging their altitude to minimize the risk, which is only great if they must descend for close-in combat. In that case, their friend is speed (and a lot of it).



          The one kind of weapon (on a bit of a side note) that they don't want is a sword or club. Absolutely nothing that requires retaining their grip as each impact would add to the force slowing them down. Sabers worked great for calvary because horses are heavy and the weight-to-impact ratio was so high that the only issue was retaining your grip. Not so with bird dudes. They'll want things they can drop in a straffing run. Short javelins come to mind. So does some form of napalm. Yeah. Napalm.



          I can envision a 2-man attack. The first comes in with enormous speed and drops a bucket of Greek Fire. The second drops a burning brand from a safe altitude. Some poor schmuck on the ground has the privilege of wetting his pants as he watches that brand gently fall... fall... fall... oh ra....






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Was right there with you until you suggested samurai-style lacquered wooden armor on the wings. That sounds much too heavy, and a thin strip as you describe is protecting an extremely small area—the odds of a projectile in such a small area seem too low to be worth trying (and failing) to protect it, when the cost is stamina, speed, and maneuverability.
            $endgroup$
            – KRyan
            Dec 25 '18 at 16:54








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @KRyan, it's not protecting against a projectile. When's the last time you hit a flying bird with a BB gun? It's there to guard against unintended impact from maneuvers.
            $endgroup$
            – JBH
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:29










          • $begingroup$
            Hm, maybe—I suggest clarifying that in your answer, and maybe providing some numbers for the relative weight of that lacquer armor. I suspect it is not particularly lightweight, even compared to steel (which could presumably be thinner), and certainly not compared to stuff like aluminum or titanium (which, to be fair, may not be reasonable assumptions in this context).
            $endgroup$
            – KRyan
            Dec 26 '18 at 0:48










          • $begingroup$
            @KRyan, I have to admit that the OP didn't say anything about tech level and I automatically (and unconciously) assumed a fantasy setting - basically medieval. You make a good point about better materials at better tech levels... but there comes a point where the tech exceeds the value of your wings and there's no purpose to protecting them or yourself anymore. This needs clarification before I clarify my answer. I'll pester the OP.
            $endgroup$
            – JBH
            Dec 26 '18 at 0:51
















          8












          $begingroup$

          You can't think of infantry on the ground, but airplanes in the air



          This race is no match for any other race on the ground. Their "infrastructure" simply won't allow them to wear the armor the other guy can wear. This is no different than an airplane, which is the proverbial sitting duck when caught on the ground.



          This means your fighter must master combat in the air — and as we all know, air superiority is often the deciding factor in a war. So, let's think about airplanes for a moment.




          • Thin skin. Originally paper or a light fabric. Bullets could go right through it.

          • Light skeleton. Originally light wood. Flexible, but driving a car down a runway disabled every plane it touched. Note that modern jet fighters are more durable (the benefit of a much higher thrust-to-weight ratio), but a crazed jihadist driving a truck could still disable a lot of them before the truck was too banged up to disable more.

          • Sleek. Since the air is where they've gotta be, they need to reduce anything that keeps them out of the air. Low weight. Sleek skins. Flexibility. Etc. Anything that degrades flight performance is out.


          So, what can we do about this? We need to preserve flexibility for flight, try to protect critical components (like the heart), and still leave some weight-carrying capacity available for things like the proverbial flower pot (we all know how deadly flower pots can be).




          • Most of the wings need no protection. An arrow through the feathers, or even the skin holding the feathers, really isn't that critical. It's the bones along the leading edge that need some help. I want you to think about the laquered bamboo armor of the Japanese Samurai. Layered strips of laquered bamboo that would shunt aside all but perfectly aimed arrows and stones. Remember, throwing missles into the air isn't as simple as it sounds. It doesn't sound like your opposing races have access to a Phalanx CIWS. You want and only need this light but semi-rigid armor along the leading edge and exposed-to-the-ground face of the bone. Being minimalist increases risk, but it also maximizes capability.


          • Rather than full armor, your birds will want armored patches principally protecting areas usually exposed to the ground. Forearm bracers covering the underside of the arm. Chest coverage and the forward areas of the legs' tibia and femur regions. You needn't worry so much about, e.g., the knee cap — that's a wailing good shot considering bird dude is zipping along and it's a small region. Again, we're trading risk for capability. This armor could be a stiffened leather to promote better flexibility. Your bird dudes will need all kinds of motion to control flight. Weight needs to be shifted more than for a person walking/running on the ground. Therefore, flexibility is a huge factor to worry about.


          • I wouldn't even worry about headwear. What sword would come down on the head of your bird dudes? If they're anywhere this could happen, they're not where they're supposed to be. Flying creatures depend on the ability to get away with speed, and intelligent flying creatures would depend on ranged attacks.



          As you can see, if these guys get stuck on the ground their dead as door nails. But so are airplanes. The point is to keep them in the air. If you think about the flight of an arrow, it slows down as altitude increases to the point where vertical acceleration is zero. Your race would quickly develop skills for judging their altitude to minimize the risk, which is only great if they must descend for close-in combat. In that case, their friend is speed (and a lot of it).



          The one kind of weapon (on a bit of a side note) that they don't want is a sword or club. Absolutely nothing that requires retaining their grip as each impact would add to the force slowing them down. Sabers worked great for calvary because horses are heavy and the weight-to-impact ratio was so high that the only issue was retaining your grip. Not so with bird dudes. They'll want things they can drop in a straffing run. Short javelins come to mind. So does some form of napalm. Yeah. Napalm.



          I can envision a 2-man attack. The first comes in with enormous speed and drops a bucket of Greek Fire. The second drops a burning brand from a safe altitude. Some poor schmuck on the ground has the privilege of wetting his pants as he watches that brand gently fall... fall... fall... oh ra....






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Was right there with you until you suggested samurai-style lacquered wooden armor on the wings. That sounds much too heavy, and a thin strip as you describe is protecting an extremely small area—the odds of a projectile in such a small area seem too low to be worth trying (and failing) to protect it, when the cost is stamina, speed, and maneuverability.
            $endgroup$
            – KRyan
            Dec 25 '18 at 16:54








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @KRyan, it's not protecting against a projectile. When's the last time you hit a flying bird with a BB gun? It's there to guard against unintended impact from maneuvers.
            $endgroup$
            – JBH
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:29










          • $begingroup$
            Hm, maybe—I suggest clarifying that in your answer, and maybe providing some numbers for the relative weight of that lacquer armor. I suspect it is not particularly lightweight, even compared to steel (which could presumably be thinner), and certainly not compared to stuff like aluminum or titanium (which, to be fair, may not be reasonable assumptions in this context).
            $endgroup$
            – KRyan
            Dec 26 '18 at 0:48










          • $begingroup$
            @KRyan, I have to admit that the OP didn't say anything about tech level and I automatically (and unconciously) assumed a fantasy setting - basically medieval. You make a good point about better materials at better tech levels... but there comes a point where the tech exceeds the value of your wings and there's no purpose to protecting them or yourself anymore. This needs clarification before I clarify my answer. I'll pester the OP.
            $endgroup$
            – JBH
            Dec 26 '18 at 0:51














          8












          8








          8





          $begingroup$

          You can't think of infantry on the ground, but airplanes in the air



          This race is no match for any other race on the ground. Their "infrastructure" simply won't allow them to wear the armor the other guy can wear. This is no different than an airplane, which is the proverbial sitting duck when caught on the ground.



          This means your fighter must master combat in the air — and as we all know, air superiority is often the deciding factor in a war. So, let's think about airplanes for a moment.




          • Thin skin. Originally paper or a light fabric. Bullets could go right through it.

          • Light skeleton. Originally light wood. Flexible, but driving a car down a runway disabled every plane it touched. Note that modern jet fighters are more durable (the benefit of a much higher thrust-to-weight ratio), but a crazed jihadist driving a truck could still disable a lot of them before the truck was too banged up to disable more.

          • Sleek. Since the air is where they've gotta be, they need to reduce anything that keeps them out of the air. Low weight. Sleek skins. Flexibility. Etc. Anything that degrades flight performance is out.


          So, what can we do about this? We need to preserve flexibility for flight, try to protect critical components (like the heart), and still leave some weight-carrying capacity available for things like the proverbial flower pot (we all know how deadly flower pots can be).




          • Most of the wings need no protection. An arrow through the feathers, or even the skin holding the feathers, really isn't that critical. It's the bones along the leading edge that need some help. I want you to think about the laquered bamboo armor of the Japanese Samurai. Layered strips of laquered bamboo that would shunt aside all but perfectly aimed arrows and stones. Remember, throwing missles into the air isn't as simple as it sounds. It doesn't sound like your opposing races have access to a Phalanx CIWS. You want and only need this light but semi-rigid armor along the leading edge and exposed-to-the-ground face of the bone. Being minimalist increases risk, but it also maximizes capability.


          • Rather than full armor, your birds will want armored patches principally protecting areas usually exposed to the ground. Forearm bracers covering the underside of the arm. Chest coverage and the forward areas of the legs' tibia and femur regions. You needn't worry so much about, e.g., the knee cap — that's a wailing good shot considering bird dude is zipping along and it's a small region. Again, we're trading risk for capability. This armor could be a stiffened leather to promote better flexibility. Your bird dudes will need all kinds of motion to control flight. Weight needs to be shifted more than for a person walking/running on the ground. Therefore, flexibility is a huge factor to worry about.


          • I wouldn't even worry about headwear. What sword would come down on the head of your bird dudes? If they're anywhere this could happen, they're not where they're supposed to be. Flying creatures depend on the ability to get away with speed, and intelligent flying creatures would depend on ranged attacks.



          As you can see, if these guys get stuck on the ground their dead as door nails. But so are airplanes. The point is to keep them in the air. If you think about the flight of an arrow, it slows down as altitude increases to the point where vertical acceleration is zero. Your race would quickly develop skills for judging their altitude to minimize the risk, which is only great if they must descend for close-in combat. In that case, their friend is speed (and a lot of it).



          The one kind of weapon (on a bit of a side note) that they don't want is a sword or club. Absolutely nothing that requires retaining their grip as each impact would add to the force slowing them down. Sabers worked great for calvary because horses are heavy and the weight-to-impact ratio was so high that the only issue was retaining your grip. Not so with bird dudes. They'll want things they can drop in a straffing run. Short javelins come to mind. So does some form of napalm. Yeah. Napalm.



          I can envision a 2-man attack. The first comes in with enormous speed and drops a bucket of Greek Fire. The second drops a burning brand from a safe altitude. Some poor schmuck on the ground has the privilege of wetting his pants as he watches that brand gently fall... fall... fall... oh ra....






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          You can't think of infantry on the ground, but airplanes in the air



          This race is no match for any other race on the ground. Their "infrastructure" simply won't allow them to wear the armor the other guy can wear. This is no different than an airplane, which is the proverbial sitting duck when caught on the ground.



          This means your fighter must master combat in the air — and as we all know, air superiority is often the deciding factor in a war. So, let's think about airplanes for a moment.




          • Thin skin. Originally paper or a light fabric. Bullets could go right through it.

          • Light skeleton. Originally light wood. Flexible, but driving a car down a runway disabled every plane it touched. Note that modern jet fighters are more durable (the benefit of a much higher thrust-to-weight ratio), but a crazed jihadist driving a truck could still disable a lot of them before the truck was too banged up to disable more.

          • Sleek. Since the air is where they've gotta be, they need to reduce anything that keeps them out of the air. Low weight. Sleek skins. Flexibility. Etc. Anything that degrades flight performance is out.


          So, what can we do about this? We need to preserve flexibility for flight, try to protect critical components (like the heart), and still leave some weight-carrying capacity available for things like the proverbial flower pot (we all know how deadly flower pots can be).




          • Most of the wings need no protection. An arrow through the feathers, or even the skin holding the feathers, really isn't that critical. It's the bones along the leading edge that need some help. I want you to think about the laquered bamboo armor of the Japanese Samurai. Layered strips of laquered bamboo that would shunt aside all but perfectly aimed arrows and stones. Remember, throwing missles into the air isn't as simple as it sounds. It doesn't sound like your opposing races have access to a Phalanx CIWS. You want and only need this light but semi-rigid armor along the leading edge and exposed-to-the-ground face of the bone. Being minimalist increases risk, but it also maximizes capability.


          • Rather than full armor, your birds will want armored patches principally protecting areas usually exposed to the ground. Forearm bracers covering the underside of the arm. Chest coverage and the forward areas of the legs' tibia and femur regions. You needn't worry so much about, e.g., the knee cap — that's a wailing good shot considering bird dude is zipping along and it's a small region. Again, we're trading risk for capability. This armor could be a stiffened leather to promote better flexibility. Your bird dudes will need all kinds of motion to control flight. Weight needs to be shifted more than for a person walking/running on the ground. Therefore, flexibility is a huge factor to worry about.


          • I wouldn't even worry about headwear. What sword would come down on the head of your bird dudes? If they're anywhere this could happen, they're not where they're supposed to be. Flying creatures depend on the ability to get away with speed, and intelligent flying creatures would depend on ranged attacks.



          As you can see, if these guys get stuck on the ground their dead as door nails. But so are airplanes. The point is to keep them in the air. If you think about the flight of an arrow, it slows down as altitude increases to the point where vertical acceleration is zero. Your race would quickly develop skills for judging their altitude to minimize the risk, which is only great if they must descend for close-in combat. In that case, their friend is speed (and a lot of it).



          The one kind of weapon (on a bit of a side note) that they don't want is a sword or club. Absolutely nothing that requires retaining their grip as each impact would add to the force slowing them down. Sabers worked great for calvary because horses are heavy and the weight-to-impact ratio was so high that the only issue was retaining your grip. Not so with bird dudes. They'll want things they can drop in a straffing run. Short javelins come to mind. So does some form of napalm. Yeah. Napalm.



          I can envision a 2-man attack. The first comes in with enormous speed and drops a bucket of Greek Fire. The second drops a burning brand from a safe altitude. Some poor schmuck on the ground has the privilege of wetting his pants as he watches that brand gently fall... fall... fall... oh ra....







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 24 '18 at 15:17

























          answered Dec 24 '18 at 15:12









          JBHJBH

          47.9k699224




          47.9k699224








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Was right there with you until you suggested samurai-style lacquered wooden armor on the wings. That sounds much too heavy, and a thin strip as you describe is protecting an extremely small area—the odds of a projectile in such a small area seem too low to be worth trying (and failing) to protect it, when the cost is stamina, speed, and maneuverability.
            $endgroup$
            – KRyan
            Dec 25 '18 at 16:54








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @KRyan, it's not protecting against a projectile. When's the last time you hit a flying bird with a BB gun? It's there to guard against unintended impact from maneuvers.
            $endgroup$
            – JBH
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:29










          • $begingroup$
            Hm, maybe—I suggest clarifying that in your answer, and maybe providing some numbers for the relative weight of that lacquer armor. I suspect it is not particularly lightweight, even compared to steel (which could presumably be thinner), and certainly not compared to stuff like aluminum or titanium (which, to be fair, may not be reasonable assumptions in this context).
            $endgroup$
            – KRyan
            Dec 26 '18 at 0:48










          • $begingroup$
            @KRyan, I have to admit that the OP didn't say anything about tech level and I automatically (and unconciously) assumed a fantasy setting - basically medieval. You make a good point about better materials at better tech levels... but there comes a point where the tech exceeds the value of your wings and there's no purpose to protecting them or yourself anymore. This needs clarification before I clarify my answer. I'll pester the OP.
            $endgroup$
            – JBH
            Dec 26 '18 at 0:51














          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Was right there with you until you suggested samurai-style lacquered wooden armor on the wings. That sounds much too heavy, and a thin strip as you describe is protecting an extremely small area—the odds of a projectile in such a small area seem too low to be worth trying (and failing) to protect it, when the cost is stamina, speed, and maneuverability.
            $endgroup$
            – KRyan
            Dec 25 '18 at 16:54








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @KRyan, it's not protecting against a projectile. When's the last time you hit a flying bird with a BB gun? It's there to guard against unintended impact from maneuvers.
            $endgroup$
            – JBH
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:29










          • $begingroup$
            Hm, maybe—I suggest clarifying that in your answer, and maybe providing some numbers for the relative weight of that lacquer armor. I suspect it is not particularly lightweight, even compared to steel (which could presumably be thinner), and certainly not compared to stuff like aluminum or titanium (which, to be fair, may not be reasonable assumptions in this context).
            $endgroup$
            – KRyan
            Dec 26 '18 at 0:48










          • $begingroup$
            @KRyan, I have to admit that the OP didn't say anything about tech level and I automatically (and unconciously) assumed a fantasy setting - basically medieval. You make a good point about better materials at better tech levels... but there comes a point where the tech exceeds the value of your wings and there's no purpose to protecting them or yourself anymore. This needs clarification before I clarify my answer. I'll pester the OP.
            $endgroup$
            – JBH
            Dec 26 '18 at 0:51








          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Was right there with you until you suggested samurai-style lacquered wooden armor on the wings. That sounds much too heavy, and a thin strip as you describe is protecting an extremely small area—the odds of a projectile in such a small area seem too low to be worth trying (and failing) to protect it, when the cost is stamina, speed, and maneuverability.
          $endgroup$
          – KRyan
          Dec 25 '18 at 16:54






          $begingroup$
          Was right there with you until you suggested samurai-style lacquered wooden armor on the wings. That sounds much too heavy, and a thin strip as you describe is protecting an extremely small area—the odds of a projectile in such a small area seem too low to be worth trying (and failing) to protect it, when the cost is stamina, speed, and maneuverability.
          $endgroup$
          – KRyan
          Dec 25 '18 at 16:54






          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @KRyan, it's not protecting against a projectile. When's the last time you hit a flying bird with a BB gun? It's there to guard against unintended impact from maneuvers.
          $endgroup$
          – JBH
          Dec 25 '18 at 17:29




          $begingroup$
          @KRyan, it's not protecting against a projectile. When's the last time you hit a flying bird with a BB gun? It's there to guard against unintended impact from maneuvers.
          $endgroup$
          – JBH
          Dec 25 '18 at 17:29












          $begingroup$
          Hm, maybe—I suggest clarifying that in your answer, and maybe providing some numbers for the relative weight of that lacquer armor. I suspect it is not particularly lightweight, even compared to steel (which could presumably be thinner), and certainly not compared to stuff like aluminum or titanium (which, to be fair, may not be reasonable assumptions in this context).
          $endgroup$
          – KRyan
          Dec 26 '18 at 0:48




          $begingroup$
          Hm, maybe—I suggest clarifying that in your answer, and maybe providing some numbers for the relative weight of that lacquer armor. I suspect it is not particularly lightweight, even compared to steel (which could presumably be thinner), and certainly not compared to stuff like aluminum or titanium (which, to be fair, may not be reasonable assumptions in this context).
          $endgroup$
          – KRyan
          Dec 26 '18 at 0:48












          $begingroup$
          @KRyan, I have to admit that the OP didn't say anything about tech level and I automatically (and unconciously) assumed a fantasy setting - basically medieval. You make a good point about better materials at better tech levels... but there comes a point where the tech exceeds the value of your wings and there's no purpose to protecting them or yourself anymore. This needs clarification before I clarify my answer. I'll pester the OP.
          $endgroup$
          – JBH
          Dec 26 '18 at 0:51




          $begingroup$
          @KRyan, I have to admit that the OP didn't say anything about tech level and I automatically (and unconciously) assumed a fantasy setting - basically medieval. You make a good point about better materials at better tech levels... but there comes a point where the tech exceeds the value of your wings and there's no purpose to protecting them or yourself anymore. This needs clarification before I clarify my answer. I'll pester the OP.
          $endgroup$
          – JBH
          Dec 26 '18 at 0:51











          6












          $begingroup$

          You would do it exactly the way birds do it: feathers. If you've ever dealt much with birds, you will probably have noticed that it's actually quite difficult to penetrate a layer of feathers. yet they're quite light. (And of course have benefits for flight, insulation, &c.)



          Further, the claim that it would be easy to break bones doesn't stand up to examination. Bird bones evolved to be light and strong. Some birds, notably swans, defend their nests with blows from their wings, and can even (rarely) break the bones of a human: http://www.myswan.org.au/index.php/faqs/is-it-true-that-a-blow-from-a-swans-wing-can-break-bones/



          That also contradicts the idea that a bird-boned race would avoid fighting. Many birds are predators, others will agressively defend their nests.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$


















            6












            $begingroup$

            You would do it exactly the way birds do it: feathers. If you've ever dealt much with birds, you will probably have noticed that it's actually quite difficult to penetrate a layer of feathers. yet they're quite light. (And of course have benefits for flight, insulation, &c.)



            Further, the claim that it would be easy to break bones doesn't stand up to examination. Bird bones evolved to be light and strong. Some birds, notably swans, defend their nests with blows from their wings, and can even (rarely) break the bones of a human: http://www.myswan.org.au/index.php/faqs/is-it-true-that-a-blow-from-a-swans-wing-can-break-bones/



            That also contradicts the idea that a bird-boned race would avoid fighting. Many birds are predators, others will agressively defend their nests.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$
















              6












              6








              6





              $begingroup$

              You would do it exactly the way birds do it: feathers. If you've ever dealt much with birds, you will probably have noticed that it's actually quite difficult to penetrate a layer of feathers. yet they're quite light. (And of course have benefits for flight, insulation, &c.)



              Further, the claim that it would be easy to break bones doesn't stand up to examination. Bird bones evolved to be light and strong. Some birds, notably swans, defend their nests with blows from their wings, and can even (rarely) break the bones of a human: http://www.myswan.org.au/index.php/faqs/is-it-true-that-a-blow-from-a-swans-wing-can-break-bones/



              That also contradicts the idea that a bird-boned race would avoid fighting. Many birds are predators, others will agressively defend their nests.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              You would do it exactly the way birds do it: feathers. If you've ever dealt much with birds, you will probably have noticed that it's actually quite difficult to penetrate a layer of feathers. yet they're quite light. (And of course have benefits for flight, insulation, &c.)



              Further, the claim that it would be easy to break bones doesn't stand up to examination. Bird bones evolved to be light and strong. Some birds, notably swans, defend their nests with blows from their wings, and can even (rarely) break the bones of a human: http://www.myswan.org.au/index.php/faqs/is-it-true-that-a-blow-from-a-swans-wing-can-break-bones/



              That also contradicts the idea that a bird-boned race would avoid fighting. Many birds are predators, others will agressively defend their nests.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Dec 24 '18 at 18:18









              jamesqfjamesqf

              10.5k11938




              10.5k11938























                  6












                  $begingroup$


                  "If people had hollow bones to enable flight how would you design armour to protect them?"




                  You wouldn't, any armor at all worthy of the name "armor" will reverse any of the advantages for flight that having hollow bones gave them in the first place.



                  If they want to fly & fight they're most likely to just rely on speed, agility & dropping stuff from a great height (well above the range of enemy projectile weapons) onto their land-bound enemies.




                  Any armor at all reduces their ability to carry larger payloads (weapons or missiles), so they're more likely to forgo any armor in exchange for being able to carry more rocks, or whatever it is they do carry to drop on those below.




                  If any of them do wear any armor the light stiffened cloth armor (Linothorax) used by the ancient Greeks is going to be a good starting point, probably cut down even further to cover only the most vital areas & of course ensure free movement of the wings, it's actually pretty effective.




                  Given their preferred technique for dealing with those who can't fly is most likely dropping stuff on their heads from on high any armor they do use is probably only worn for combat with others who also fly.







                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$


















                    6












                    $begingroup$


                    "If people had hollow bones to enable flight how would you design armour to protect them?"




                    You wouldn't, any armor at all worthy of the name "armor" will reverse any of the advantages for flight that having hollow bones gave them in the first place.



                    If they want to fly & fight they're most likely to just rely on speed, agility & dropping stuff from a great height (well above the range of enemy projectile weapons) onto their land-bound enemies.




                    Any armor at all reduces their ability to carry larger payloads (weapons or missiles), so they're more likely to forgo any armor in exchange for being able to carry more rocks, or whatever it is they do carry to drop on those below.




                    If any of them do wear any armor the light stiffened cloth armor (Linothorax) used by the ancient Greeks is going to be a good starting point, probably cut down even further to cover only the most vital areas & of course ensure free movement of the wings, it's actually pretty effective.




                    Given their preferred technique for dealing with those who can't fly is most likely dropping stuff on their heads from on high any armor they do use is probably only worn for combat with others who also fly.







                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$
















                      6












                      6








                      6





                      $begingroup$


                      "If people had hollow bones to enable flight how would you design armour to protect them?"




                      You wouldn't, any armor at all worthy of the name "armor" will reverse any of the advantages for flight that having hollow bones gave them in the first place.



                      If they want to fly & fight they're most likely to just rely on speed, agility & dropping stuff from a great height (well above the range of enemy projectile weapons) onto their land-bound enemies.




                      Any armor at all reduces their ability to carry larger payloads (weapons or missiles), so they're more likely to forgo any armor in exchange for being able to carry more rocks, or whatever it is they do carry to drop on those below.




                      If any of them do wear any armor the light stiffened cloth armor (Linothorax) used by the ancient Greeks is going to be a good starting point, probably cut down even further to cover only the most vital areas & of course ensure free movement of the wings, it's actually pretty effective.




                      Given their preferred technique for dealing with those who can't fly is most likely dropping stuff on their heads from on high any armor they do use is probably only worn for combat with others who also fly.







                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$




                      "If people had hollow bones to enable flight how would you design armour to protect them?"




                      You wouldn't, any armor at all worthy of the name "armor" will reverse any of the advantages for flight that having hollow bones gave them in the first place.



                      If they want to fly & fight they're most likely to just rely on speed, agility & dropping stuff from a great height (well above the range of enemy projectile weapons) onto their land-bound enemies.




                      Any armor at all reduces their ability to carry larger payloads (weapons or missiles), so they're more likely to forgo any armor in exchange for being able to carry more rocks, or whatever it is they do carry to drop on those below.




                      If any of them do wear any armor the light stiffened cloth armor (Linothorax) used by the ancient Greeks is going to be a good starting point, probably cut down even further to cover only the most vital areas & of course ensure free movement of the wings, it's actually pretty effective.




                      Given their preferred technique for dealing with those who can't fly is most likely dropping stuff on their heads from on high any armor they do use is probably only worn for combat with others who also fly.








                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Dec 25 '18 at 18:20

























                      answered Dec 24 '18 at 13:59









                      PelinorePelinore

                      2,661825




                      2,661825























                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          Bamboo.



                          bamboo armor
                          https://www.pinterest.com/pin/148759593911433770/?lp=true



                          Bamboo really has been used for armor. It would be great for your flying folk. It has several advantages.



                          1: Light.



                          2: Cheap.



                          3: It can absorb impacts by breaking.



                          4: It can catch a sharp incoming edge within itself rather than deflecting the energy elsewhere.



                          5: The armor can be made modular - so pieces broken during one engagement can be swapped out for replacements.



                          6: Looks awesome.




                          1. Parts of the bamboo tubing could be left open. When your flying folk dive and attack, air would whistle across it. All of them diving together would be a scary noise.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$


















                            1












                            $begingroup$

                            Bamboo.



                            bamboo armor
                            https://www.pinterest.com/pin/148759593911433770/?lp=true



                            Bamboo really has been used for armor. It would be great for your flying folk. It has several advantages.



                            1: Light.



                            2: Cheap.



                            3: It can absorb impacts by breaking.



                            4: It can catch a sharp incoming edge within itself rather than deflecting the energy elsewhere.



                            5: The armor can be made modular - so pieces broken during one engagement can be swapped out for replacements.



                            6: Looks awesome.




                            1. Parts of the bamboo tubing could be left open. When your flying folk dive and attack, air would whistle across it. All of them diving together would be a scary noise.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$
















                              1












                              1








                              1





                              $begingroup$

                              Bamboo.



                              bamboo armor
                              https://www.pinterest.com/pin/148759593911433770/?lp=true



                              Bamboo really has been used for armor. It would be great for your flying folk. It has several advantages.



                              1: Light.



                              2: Cheap.



                              3: It can absorb impacts by breaking.



                              4: It can catch a sharp incoming edge within itself rather than deflecting the energy elsewhere.



                              5: The armor can be made modular - so pieces broken during one engagement can be swapped out for replacements.



                              6: Looks awesome.




                              1. Parts of the bamboo tubing could be left open. When your flying folk dive and attack, air would whistle across it. All of them diving together would be a scary noise.






                              share|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              Bamboo.



                              bamboo armor
                              https://www.pinterest.com/pin/148759593911433770/?lp=true



                              Bamboo really has been used for armor. It would be great for your flying folk. It has several advantages.



                              1: Light.



                              2: Cheap.



                              3: It can absorb impacts by breaking.



                              4: It can catch a sharp incoming edge within itself rather than deflecting the energy elsewhere.



                              5: The armor can be made modular - so pieces broken during one engagement can be swapped out for replacements.



                              6: Looks awesome.




                              1. Parts of the bamboo tubing could be left open. When your flying folk dive and attack, air would whistle across it. All of them diving together would be a scary noise.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Dec 25 '18 at 19:08









                              WillkWillk

                              116k27219487




                              116k27219487























                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  If your world is free to invent things that might not exist in ours, you could say there exists a type of metal lighter than the usual ones we use, say it's specific to the avian race's home/continent and have them develop it into all manner of armour.



                                  Alternatively, if your world has magic, another option is to magically imbue regular cloth and leather armour to make it more sturdy to attacks/impacts and provide greater flexibility for flight/stealth/quick dashes in and out of a fight.



                                  One thing that definitely changes how to design armour is whether the avian race has wings and what type of wings are most common, are there perhaps multiple pairs of wings, can they be hidden. Having an opening for wings provides another weak point in ones armour and makes flanking more dangerous, but also you have to take into account how to make the openings flexible enough not to hinder flight.






                                  share|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$


















                                    0












                                    $begingroup$

                                    If your world is free to invent things that might not exist in ours, you could say there exists a type of metal lighter than the usual ones we use, say it's specific to the avian race's home/continent and have them develop it into all manner of armour.



                                    Alternatively, if your world has magic, another option is to magically imbue regular cloth and leather armour to make it more sturdy to attacks/impacts and provide greater flexibility for flight/stealth/quick dashes in and out of a fight.



                                    One thing that definitely changes how to design armour is whether the avian race has wings and what type of wings are most common, are there perhaps multiple pairs of wings, can they be hidden. Having an opening for wings provides another weak point in ones armour and makes flanking more dangerous, but also you have to take into account how to make the openings flexible enough not to hinder flight.






                                    share|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$
















                                      0












                                      0








                                      0





                                      $begingroup$

                                      If your world is free to invent things that might not exist in ours, you could say there exists a type of metal lighter than the usual ones we use, say it's specific to the avian race's home/continent and have them develop it into all manner of armour.



                                      Alternatively, if your world has magic, another option is to magically imbue regular cloth and leather armour to make it more sturdy to attacks/impacts and provide greater flexibility for flight/stealth/quick dashes in and out of a fight.



                                      One thing that definitely changes how to design armour is whether the avian race has wings and what type of wings are most common, are there perhaps multiple pairs of wings, can they be hidden. Having an opening for wings provides another weak point in ones armour and makes flanking more dangerous, but also you have to take into account how to make the openings flexible enough not to hinder flight.






                                      share|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$



                                      If your world is free to invent things that might not exist in ours, you could say there exists a type of metal lighter than the usual ones we use, say it's specific to the avian race's home/continent and have them develop it into all manner of armour.



                                      Alternatively, if your world has magic, another option is to magically imbue regular cloth and leather armour to make it more sturdy to attacks/impacts and provide greater flexibility for flight/stealth/quick dashes in and out of a fight.



                                      One thing that definitely changes how to design armour is whether the avian race has wings and what type of wings are most common, are there perhaps multiple pairs of wings, can they be hidden. Having an opening for wings provides another weak point in ones armour and makes flanking more dangerous, but also you have to take into account how to make the openings flexible enough not to hinder flight.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered Dec 25 '18 at 8:46









                                      bigchickcannibalisticbigchickcannibalistic

                                      2045




                                      2045






























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded




















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid …



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134663%2fif-people-had-hollow-bones-to-enable-flight-how-would-you-design-armour-to-prote%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          -

                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Bundesstraße 106

                                          Image
                                          Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
                                          Read more

                                          Verónica Boquete

                                          Image
                                          Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
                                          Read more

                                          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                                          Image
                                          Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
                                          Read more