Without using Reimann Mapping theorem , How to argue conformal maps does not exist?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Without using Reimann Mapping theorem , How to argue conformal maps does not exist ?



1) For $mathbb C/${0}$to mathbb D$



I know first set is not simply connected .But need to argue without using RMT.

I tried to Liovellies theorem but as function is not entire, I could not applied.
I also tried reverse direction I know that any non vanishing function is of form $e^{f(z)}$ for some holomorphic function f(z).
Please suggest some natural strategy to tackle such problem?

Any Help will be appreciated










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Without using Reimann Mapping theorem , How to argue conformal maps does not exist ?



    1) For $mathbb C/${0}$to mathbb D$



    I know first set is not simply connected .But need to argue without using RMT.

    I tried to Liovellies theorem but as function is not entire, I could not applied.
    I also tried reverse direction I know that any non vanishing function is of form $e^{f(z)}$ for some holomorphic function f(z).
    Please suggest some natural strategy to tackle such problem?

    Any Help will be appreciated










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Without using Reimann Mapping theorem , How to argue conformal maps does not exist ?



      1) For $mathbb C/${0}$to mathbb D$



      I know first set is not simply connected .But need to argue without using RMT.

      I tried to Liovellies theorem but as function is not entire, I could not applied.
      I also tried reverse direction I know that any non vanishing function is of form $e^{f(z)}$ for some holomorphic function f(z).
      Please suggest some natural strategy to tackle such problem?

      Any Help will be appreciated










      share|cite|improve this question















      Without using Reimann Mapping theorem , How to argue conformal maps does not exist ?



      1) For $mathbb C/${0}$to mathbb D$



      I know first set is not simply connected .But need to argue without using RMT.

      I tried to Liovellies theorem but as function is not entire, I could not applied.
      I also tried reverse direction I know that any non vanishing function is of form $e^{f(z)}$ for some holomorphic function f(z).
      Please suggest some natural strategy to tackle such problem?

      Any Help will be appreciated







      complex-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 19 at 11:43

























      asked Nov 19 at 11:38









      Shubham

      1,4641519




      1,4641519






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Let $f : mathbb C setminus {0} to mathbb D$ holomorphic. Then $0$ is an isolated singularity of $f$ and $f$ is bounded. Hence, $0$ is a removable singularity of $f$. Therefore there is a entire function $g$ such that $f(z)=g(z)$ for all $z ne 0$. Then $g$ is bounded and by Liouville $g$ is constant. Thus $f$ is constant.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            You can extend such a map to the whole $mathbb{C}$ by the classification of singularities. So you get a contradiction from Louville's Theorem.






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              If a conformal map existed then it would be invertible, under which function the image of $mathbb D$ would have to be simply connected.






              share|cite|improve this answer





















                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                });
                });
                }, "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                 

                draft saved


                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004818%2fwithout-using-reimann-mapping-theorem-how-to-argue-conformal-maps-does-not-exi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes








                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted










                Let $f : mathbb C setminus {0} to mathbb D$ holomorphic. Then $0$ is an isolated singularity of $f$ and $f$ is bounded. Hence, $0$ is a removable singularity of $f$. Therefore there is a entire function $g$ such that $f(z)=g(z)$ for all $z ne 0$. Then $g$ is bounded and by Liouville $g$ is constant. Thus $f$ is constant.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote



                  accepted










                  Let $f : mathbb C setminus {0} to mathbb D$ holomorphic. Then $0$ is an isolated singularity of $f$ and $f$ is bounded. Hence, $0$ is a removable singularity of $f$. Therefore there is a entire function $g$ such that $f(z)=g(z)$ for all $z ne 0$. Then $g$ is bounded and by Liouville $g$ is constant. Thus $f$ is constant.






                  share|cite|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote



                    accepted







                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote



                    accepted






                    Let $f : mathbb C setminus {0} to mathbb D$ holomorphic. Then $0$ is an isolated singularity of $f$ and $f$ is bounded. Hence, $0$ is a removable singularity of $f$. Therefore there is a entire function $g$ such that $f(z)=g(z)$ for all $z ne 0$. Then $g$ is bounded and by Liouville $g$ is constant. Thus $f$ is constant.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    Let $f : mathbb C setminus {0} to mathbb D$ holomorphic. Then $0$ is an isolated singularity of $f$ and $f$ is bounded. Hence, $0$ is a removable singularity of $f$. Therefore there is a entire function $g$ such that $f(z)=g(z)$ for all $z ne 0$. Then $g$ is bounded and by Liouville $g$ is constant. Thus $f$ is constant.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Nov 19 at 11:49









                    Fred

                    42.6k1642




                    42.6k1642






















                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        You can extend such a map to the whole $mathbb{C}$ by the classification of singularities. So you get a contradiction from Louville's Theorem.






                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          You can extend such a map to the whole $mathbb{C}$ by the classification of singularities. So you get a contradiction from Louville's Theorem.






                          share|cite|improve this answer























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote









                            You can extend such a map to the whole $mathbb{C}$ by the classification of singularities. So you get a contradiction from Louville's Theorem.






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            You can extend such a map to the whole $mathbb{C}$ by the classification of singularities. So you get a contradiction from Louville's Theorem.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Nov 19 at 11:46









                            Dante Grevino

                            5017




                            5017






















                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote













                                If a conformal map existed then it would be invertible, under which function the image of $mathbb D$ would have to be simply connected.






                                share|cite|improve this answer

























                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  If a conformal map existed then it would be invertible, under which function the image of $mathbb D$ would have to be simply connected.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer























                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote










                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote









                                    If a conformal map existed then it would be invertible, under which function the image of $mathbb D$ would have to be simply connected.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    If a conformal map existed then it would be invertible, under which function the image of $mathbb D$ would have to be simply connected.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered Nov 19 at 11:45









                                    Richard Martin

                                    1,5868




                                    1,5868






























                                         

                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded



















































                                         


                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004818%2fwithout-using-reimann-mapping-theorem-how-to-argue-conformal-maps-does-not-exi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Bundesstraße 106

                                        Verónica Boquete

                                        Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten