Efficient way to do a Fourrier Transform like operation












0












$begingroup$


Suppose we have two functions $f,g:[0,infty) rightarrow [0,infty)$. Then one can use Fast Fourrier Transforms to quickly compute $int_0^t f(t-s) g(s) , ds$ for $t$ in some range of values $[0,T]$ this can be done for example in Matlab using ifft(fft(f).*fft(g)).



Now let $M in [0,infty)$ be some number and assume we want to compute the integral $int_0^M f(t-s) g(s) , ds$ for $t$ in some range $[M,T]$. Is there something similar we can do?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    can't you just define $g$ to be $0$ on the range $[M,T]$ so that the integral is equal to the integral over the range $[0,T]$ and then you can apply the method you mentioned first?
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 5 '18 at 16:41










  • $begingroup$
    That is completely correct! Thanks, you can formulate this as a proper answer, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Darkwizie
    Dec 5 '18 at 19:28
















0












$begingroup$


Suppose we have two functions $f,g:[0,infty) rightarrow [0,infty)$. Then one can use Fast Fourrier Transforms to quickly compute $int_0^t f(t-s) g(s) , ds$ for $t$ in some range of values $[0,T]$ this can be done for example in Matlab using ifft(fft(f).*fft(g)).



Now let $M in [0,infty)$ be some number and assume we want to compute the integral $int_0^M f(t-s) g(s) , ds$ for $t$ in some range $[M,T]$. Is there something similar we can do?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    can't you just define $g$ to be $0$ on the range $[M,T]$ so that the integral is equal to the integral over the range $[0,T]$ and then you can apply the method you mentioned first?
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 5 '18 at 16:41










  • $begingroup$
    That is completely correct! Thanks, you can formulate this as a proper answer, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Darkwizie
    Dec 5 '18 at 19:28














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Suppose we have two functions $f,g:[0,infty) rightarrow [0,infty)$. Then one can use Fast Fourrier Transforms to quickly compute $int_0^t f(t-s) g(s) , ds$ for $t$ in some range of values $[0,T]$ this can be done for example in Matlab using ifft(fft(f).*fft(g)).



Now let $M in [0,infty)$ be some number and assume we want to compute the integral $int_0^M f(t-s) g(s) , ds$ for $t$ in some range $[M,T]$. Is there something similar we can do?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Suppose we have two functions $f,g:[0,infty) rightarrow [0,infty)$. Then one can use Fast Fourrier Transforms to quickly compute $int_0^t f(t-s) g(s) , ds$ for $t$ in some range of values $[0,T]$ this can be done for example in Matlab using ifft(fft(f).*fft(g)).



Now let $M in [0,infty)$ be some number and assume we want to compute the integral $int_0^M f(t-s) g(s) , ds$ for $t$ in some range $[M,T]$. Is there something similar we can do?







real-analysis calculus matlab fast-fourier-transform






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 5 '18 at 16:38









DarkwizieDarkwizie

14811




14811












  • $begingroup$
    can't you just define $g$ to be $0$ on the range $[M,T]$ so that the integral is equal to the integral over the range $[0,T]$ and then you can apply the method you mentioned first?
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 5 '18 at 16:41










  • $begingroup$
    That is completely correct! Thanks, you can formulate this as a proper answer, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Darkwizie
    Dec 5 '18 at 19:28


















  • $begingroup$
    can't you just define $g$ to be $0$ on the range $[M,T]$ so that the integral is equal to the integral over the range $[0,T]$ and then you can apply the method you mentioned first?
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 5 '18 at 16:41










  • $begingroup$
    That is completely correct! Thanks, you can formulate this as a proper answer, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Darkwizie
    Dec 5 '18 at 19:28
















$begingroup$
can't you just define $g$ to be $0$ on the range $[M,T]$ so that the integral is equal to the integral over the range $[0,T]$ and then you can apply the method you mentioned first?
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 5 '18 at 16:41




$begingroup$
can't you just define $g$ to be $0$ on the range $[M,T]$ so that the integral is equal to the integral over the range $[0,T]$ and then you can apply the method you mentioned first?
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 5 '18 at 16:41












$begingroup$
That is completely correct! Thanks, you can formulate this as a proper answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Darkwizie
Dec 5 '18 at 19:28




$begingroup$
That is completely correct! Thanks, you can formulate this as a proper answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Darkwizie
Dec 5 '18 at 19:28










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

You can just define g to be $0$ on the range $[M,T]$ so that the integral is equal to the integral over the range $[0,T]$ and then you can apply the method you mentioned first.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027307%2fefficient-way-to-do-a-fourrier-transform-like-operation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    You can just define g to be $0$ on the range $[M,T]$ so that the integral is equal to the integral over the range $[0,T]$ and then you can apply the method you mentioned first.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      You can just define g to be $0$ on the range $[M,T]$ so that the integral is equal to the integral over the range $[0,T]$ and then you can apply the method you mentioned first.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        You can just define g to be $0$ on the range $[M,T]$ so that the integral is equal to the integral over the range $[0,T]$ and then you can apply the method you mentioned first.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        You can just define g to be $0$ on the range $[M,T]$ so that the integral is equal to the integral over the range $[0,T]$ and then you can apply the method you mentioned first.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 5 '18 at 21:49









        mathworker21mathworker21

        8,9421928




        8,9421928






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027307%2fefficient-way-to-do-a-fourrier-transform-like-operation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten