Prove that $lim_{n to infty} a_n = -infty $ if $ forall ngeq m: a_n leq a_m +2017$, and $-infty$ is a...












0












$begingroup$


Given a sequence ${a_n}_{n=1}^{infty} $ such that



$forall ngeq m: a_n leq a_m +2017$,



and $-infty$ is a substantial limit of $a_n$,



Prove that $lim_{n to infty} a_n = -infty$.



my attempt:
It's clear that: $text{lim inf}_{n to infty} (a_n) = -infty$.



I'd like to prove that $text{lim inf}_{n to infty} (a_n) = -infty$, and that will prove the claim.



there exist a sub-sequence of $a_n$,



let it be $a_{n_{k}}$ such that $$lim_{kto infty} a_{n_{k}} = -infty$$



then for every $ n geq m: $ $a_{n_{k}} leq a_{m_{k}} + 2017 $



$exists M > 0 text{ such that} forall Nin mathbb{N}: exists n geq m geq N: M leq |a_{n_{k}}| leq |a_{m_{k}} + 2017| $



I'm not sure how to continue from here in order to prove that the limit of the sub sequence is the limit of the sequence.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Given a sequence ${a_n}_{n=1}^{infty} $ such that



    $forall ngeq m: a_n leq a_m +2017$,



    and $-infty$ is a substantial limit of $a_n$,



    Prove that $lim_{n to infty} a_n = -infty$.



    my attempt:
    It's clear that: $text{lim inf}_{n to infty} (a_n) = -infty$.



    I'd like to prove that $text{lim inf}_{n to infty} (a_n) = -infty$, and that will prove the claim.



    there exist a sub-sequence of $a_n$,



    let it be $a_{n_{k}}$ such that $$lim_{kto infty} a_{n_{k}} = -infty$$



    then for every $ n geq m: $ $a_{n_{k}} leq a_{m_{k}} + 2017 $



    $exists M > 0 text{ such that} forall Nin mathbb{N}: exists n geq m geq N: M leq |a_{n_{k}}| leq |a_{m_{k}} + 2017| $



    I'm not sure how to continue from here in order to prove that the limit of the sub sequence is the limit of the sequence.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Given a sequence ${a_n}_{n=1}^{infty} $ such that



      $forall ngeq m: a_n leq a_m +2017$,



      and $-infty$ is a substantial limit of $a_n$,



      Prove that $lim_{n to infty} a_n = -infty$.



      my attempt:
      It's clear that: $text{lim inf}_{n to infty} (a_n) = -infty$.



      I'd like to prove that $text{lim inf}_{n to infty} (a_n) = -infty$, and that will prove the claim.



      there exist a sub-sequence of $a_n$,



      let it be $a_{n_{k}}$ such that $$lim_{kto infty} a_{n_{k}} = -infty$$



      then for every $ n geq m: $ $a_{n_{k}} leq a_{m_{k}} + 2017 $



      $exists M > 0 text{ such that} forall Nin mathbb{N}: exists n geq m geq N: M leq |a_{n_{k}}| leq |a_{m_{k}} + 2017| $



      I'm not sure how to continue from here in order to prove that the limit of the sub sequence is the limit of the sequence.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Given a sequence ${a_n}_{n=1}^{infty} $ such that



      $forall ngeq m: a_n leq a_m +2017$,



      and $-infty$ is a substantial limit of $a_n$,



      Prove that $lim_{n to infty} a_n = -infty$.



      my attempt:
      It's clear that: $text{lim inf}_{n to infty} (a_n) = -infty$.



      I'd like to prove that $text{lim inf}_{n to infty} (a_n) = -infty$, and that will prove the claim.



      there exist a sub-sequence of $a_n$,



      let it be $a_{n_{k}}$ such that $$lim_{kto infty} a_{n_{k}} = -infty$$



      then for every $ n geq m: $ $a_{n_{k}} leq a_{m_{k}} + 2017 $



      $exists M > 0 text{ such that} forall Nin mathbb{N}: exists n geq m geq N: M leq |a_{n_{k}}| leq |a_{m_{k}} + 2017| $



      I'm not sure how to continue from here in order to prove that the limit of the sub sequence is the limit of the sequence.







      real-analysis calculus sequences-and-series convergence






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 5 '18 at 17:14









      Martin Sleziak

      44.8k9118272




      44.8k9118272










      asked Dec 5 '18 at 16:12









      JnevenJneven

      826322




      826322






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Fix $m$ then $$limsup_{ntoinfty } a_n leq limsup_{ntoinfty } (a_m +2017 )= a_m +2017$$
          Now $$limsup_{ntoinfty } a_n=liminf_{mtoinfty } ( limsup_{ntoinfty } a_n) leq liminf_{mtoinfty } ( a_m +2017)=2017+liminf_{mtoinfty } a_m =-infty$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            If $liminf_{ktoinfty} a_{n_k} = -infty$ then for every $M$ there is some $K$ such that $a_{n_k} < M$ for every $k geq K$, and by the condition stated, $a_n leq a_{n_k} + 2017 < M + 2017$ for every $ngeq n_k$. If we pick $M = -N-2017$ then $a_n < -N$ for every $ngeq n_k$, so the tail of the sequence can be made arbitrarily small for $n$ large enough, which is the definition of $lim_{ntoinfty} a_n = -infty$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027266%2fprove-that-lim-n-to-infty-a-n-infty-if-forall-n-geq-m-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              Fix $m$ then $$limsup_{ntoinfty } a_n leq limsup_{ntoinfty } (a_m +2017 )= a_m +2017$$
              Now $$limsup_{ntoinfty } a_n=liminf_{mtoinfty } ( limsup_{ntoinfty } a_n) leq liminf_{mtoinfty } ( a_m +2017)=2017+liminf_{mtoinfty } a_m =-infty$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                Fix $m$ then $$limsup_{ntoinfty } a_n leq limsup_{ntoinfty } (a_m +2017 )= a_m +2017$$
                Now $$limsup_{ntoinfty } a_n=liminf_{mtoinfty } ( limsup_{ntoinfty } a_n) leq liminf_{mtoinfty } ( a_m +2017)=2017+liminf_{mtoinfty } a_m =-infty$$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Fix $m$ then $$limsup_{ntoinfty } a_n leq limsup_{ntoinfty } (a_m +2017 )= a_m +2017$$
                  Now $$limsup_{ntoinfty } a_n=liminf_{mtoinfty } ( limsup_{ntoinfty } a_n) leq liminf_{mtoinfty } ( a_m +2017)=2017+liminf_{mtoinfty } a_m =-infty$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Fix $m$ then $$limsup_{ntoinfty } a_n leq limsup_{ntoinfty } (a_m +2017 )= a_m +2017$$
                  Now $$limsup_{ntoinfty } a_n=liminf_{mtoinfty } ( limsup_{ntoinfty } a_n) leq liminf_{mtoinfty } ( a_m +2017)=2017+liminf_{mtoinfty } a_m =-infty$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 5 '18 at 16:52









                  MotylaNogaTomkaMazuraMotylaNogaTomkaMazura

                  6,562917




                  6,562917























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      If $liminf_{ktoinfty} a_{n_k} = -infty$ then for every $M$ there is some $K$ such that $a_{n_k} < M$ for every $k geq K$, and by the condition stated, $a_n leq a_{n_k} + 2017 < M + 2017$ for every $ngeq n_k$. If we pick $M = -N-2017$ then $a_n < -N$ for every $ngeq n_k$, so the tail of the sequence can be made arbitrarily small for $n$ large enough, which is the definition of $lim_{ntoinfty} a_n = -infty$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        If $liminf_{ktoinfty} a_{n_k} = -infty$ then for every $M$ there is some $K$ such that $a_{n_k} < M$ for every $k geq K$, and by the condition stated, $a_n leq a_{n_k} + 2017 < M + 2017$ for every $ngeq n_k$. If we pick $M = -N-2017$ then $a_n < -N$ for every $ngeq n_k$, so the tail of the sequence can be made arbitrarily small for $n$ large enough, which is the definition of $lim_{ntoinfty} a_n = -infty$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          If $liminf_{ktoinfty} a_{n_k} = -infty$ then for every $M$ there is some $K$ such that $a_{n_k} < M$ for every $k geq K$, and by the condition stated, $a_n leq a_{n_k} + 2017 < M + 2017$ for every $ngeq n_k$. If we pick $M = -N-2017$ then $a_n < -N$ for every $ngeq n_k$, so the tail of the sequence can be made arbitrarily small for $n$ large enough, which is the definition of $lim_{ntoinfty} a_n = -infty$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          If $liminf_{ktoinfty} a_{n_k} = -infty$ then for every $M$ there is some $K$ such that $a_{n_k} < M$ for every $k geq K$, and by the condition stated, $a_n leq a_{n_k} + 2017 < M + 2017$ for every $ngeq n_k$. If we pick $M = -N-2017$ then $a_n < -N$ for every $ngeq n_k$, so the tail of the sequence can be made arbitrarily small for $n$ large enough, which is the definition of $lim_{ntoinfty} a_n = -infty$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Dec 5 '18 at 16:48









                          mlerma54mlerma54

                          1,177148




                          1,177148






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027266%2fprove-that-lim-n-to-infty-a-n-infty-if-forall-n-geq-m-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Bundesstraße 106

                              Verónica Boquete

                              Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten