Recurrence and Fibonacci: $a_{n+1}=frac {1+a_n}{2+a_n}$












10












$begingroup$


For the recurrence relation
$$a_{n+1}=frac {1+a_n}{2+a_n}$$
where $a_1=1$, the solution is $a_n=frac {F_{2n}}{F_{2n+1}}$, where $F_n$ is the $n$-th Fibonacci number, according to the convention where $F_1=0, F_2=1,cdots
$



This can easily be proven by substituting the solution back into the recurrence relation, or alternatively by induction.




Can the solution be derived directly from the recurrence relation itself, i.e. not by substituting the solution into the recurrence, or by induction?











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    i really dont know why this got downvoted .. so sad !! i think the question is really nice (+1)
    $endgroup$
    – Ahmad Bazzi
    Dec 5 '18 at 16:20










  • $begingroup$
    @AhmadBazzi neither do I but thanks for the encouraging comment and upvote! :)
    $endgroup$
    – hypergeometric
    Dec 5 '18 at 16:21
















10












$begingroup$


For the recurrence relation
$$a_{n+1}=frac {1+a_n}{2+a_n}$$
where $a_1=1$, the solution is $a_n=frac {F_{2n}}{F_{2n+1}}$, where $F_n$ is the $n$-th Fibonacci number, according to the convention where $F_1=0, F_2=1,cdots
$



This can easily be proven by substituting the solution back into the recurrence relation, or alternatively by induction.




Can the solution be derived directly from the recurrence relation itself, i.e. not by substituting the solution into the recurrence, or by induction?











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    i really dont know why this got downvoted .. so sad !! i think the question is really nice (+1)
    $endgroup$
    – Ahmad Bazzi
    Dec 5 '18 at 16:20










  • $begingroup$
    @AhmadBazzi neither do I but thanks for the encouraging comment and upvote! :)
    $endgroup$
    – hypergeometric
    Dec 5 '18 at 16:21














10












10








10


3



$begingroup$


For the recurrence relation
$$a_{n+1}=frac {1+a_n}{2+a_n}$$
where $a_1=1$, the solution is $a_n=frac {F_{2n}}{F_{2n+1}}$, where $F_n$ is the $n$-th Fibonacci number, according to the convention where $F_1=0, F_2=1,cdots
$



This can easily be proven by substituting the solution back into the recurrence relation, or alternatively by induction.




Can the solution be derived directly from the recurrence relation itself, i.e. not by substituting the solution into the recurrence, or by induction?











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




For the recurrence relation
$$a_{n+1}=frac {1+a_n}{2+a_n}$$
where $a_1=1$, the solution is $a_n=frac {F_{2n}}{F_{2n+1}}$, where $F_n$ is the $n$-th Fibonacci number, according to the convention where $F_1=0, F_2=1,cdots
$



This can easily be proven by substituting the solution back into the recurrence relation, or alternatively by induction.




Can the solution be derived directly from the recurrence relation itself, i.e. not by substituting the solution into the recurrence, or by induction?








recurrence-relations fibonacci-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 5 '18 at 17:00







hypergeometric

















asked Dec 5 '18 at 16:15









hypergeometrichypergeometric

17.7k1758




17.7k1758












  • $begingroup$
    i really dont know why this got downvoted .. so sad !! i think the question is really nice (+1)
    $endgroup$
    – Ahmad Bazzi
    Dec 5 '18 at 16:20










  • $begingroup$
    @AhmadBazzi neither do I but thanks for the encouraging comment and upvote! :)
    $endgroup$
    – hypergeometric
    Dec 5 '18 at 16:21


















  • $begingroup$
    i really dont know why this got downvoted .. so sad !! i think the question is really nice (+1)
    $endgroup$
    – Ahmad Bazzi
    Dec 5 '18 at 16:20










  • $begingroup$
    @AhmadBazzi neither do I but thanks for the encouraging comment and upvote! :)
    $endgroup$
    – hypergeometric
    Dec 5 '18 at 16:21
















$begingroup$
i really dont know why this got downvoted .. so sad !! i think the question is really nice (+1)
$endgroup$
– Ahmad Bazzi
Dec 5 '18 at 16:20




$begingroup$
i really dont know why this got downvoted .. so sad !! i think the question is really nice (+1)
$endgroup$
– Ahmad Bazzi
Dec 5 '18 at 16:20












$begingroup$
@AhmadBazzi neither do I but thanks for the encouraging comment and upvote! :)
$endgroup$
– hypergeometric
Dec 5 '18 at 16:21




$begingroup$
@AhmadBazzi neither do I but thanks for the encouraging comment and upvote! :)
$endgroup$
– hypergeometric
Dec 5 '18 at 16:21










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

Yes, it can be derived directly, assuming some familiarity with the Fibonacci numbers. I am using the initial conditions $F_1=F_2=1$ for the Fibonacci numbers, which impies that
$$
a_{n}=frac{F_{2n-1}}{F_{2n}}
$$



There is a nice property involving functions of the form
$$
f(x) = frac{ax+b}{cx+d}
$$

If you compose such an $f$ with another $g(x)=frac{px+q}{sx+t}$ of the same form, the result is another function in the same form, whose coefficients are identical to matrix product of the squares of coefficients of $f$ and $g$:
$$
fcirc g = frac{(ap+bs)x+(aq+bt)}{(cp+ds)x+(cq+dt)}
$$

Letting
$$
f(x)=frac{1+x}{2+x}
$$

this implies that
$$a_n=fcirc fcirc dots circ fbig(1big),$$ with $n-1$ functions composed. Using the matrix connection, and the observation that substituting $x=1$ results in a fraction whose numerator and denominator are the components of the right column of this matrix, this implies that $a_n$ is a fraction whose numerator an denominator are given by the matrix
$$
a_n=frac{b_n}{c_n},qquad begin{bmatrix}b_n\c_nend{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}1&1\1&2end{bmatrix}^{n-1}begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}
=begin{bmatrix}0&1\1&1end{bmatrix}^{2(n-1)}begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}
$$

Finally, recall that $begin{bmatrix}0&1\1&1end{bmatrix}$ is the "Fibonacci matrix" which satisfies
$$
begin{bmatrix}0&1\1&1end{bmatrix}^n=begin{bmatrix}F_{n-1}&F_n\F_{n}&F_{n+1}end{bmatrix},
$$

an identity which follows directly from the recurrence $F_n=F_{n-1}+F_{n-2}$ and base cases $F_0=0,F_1=1$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks. Very nice solution (+1). Interesting property of $f(x)$ and clever application.
    $endgroup$
    – hypergeometric
    Dec 5 '18 at 17:02



















8












$begingroup$

Hint:
By letting $2+a_n=frac{b_{n+1}}{b_n}$, we get
$$frac{b_{n+2}}{b_{n+1}}-2 = 1 - frac{b_{n}}{b_{n+1}} implies b_{n+2} -3b_{n+1} + b_{n} = 0.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks (+1). Nice hint. At least that gets us to a nice linear recurrence relation.
    $endgroup$
    – hypergeometric
    Dec 5 '18 at 16:55










  • $begingroup$
    clever substitution (+1)
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    Dec 5 '18 at 17:31



















1












$begingroup$

[My interpretation of Mike Earnest's solution, posted here for my own reference only]



$$begin{align}
a_{n+1}&=frac {b_{n+1}}{c_{n+1}}=frac {1+frac {b_n}{c_n}}{2+frac {b_n}{c_n}}=frac {b_n+c_n}{b_n+2c_n}\\
left(b_{n+1}atop c_{n+1}right)
&=left(1 1atop 1 2right)left(b_{n}atop c_{n}right)
=left(1 1atop 1 2right)^2left(b_{n-1}atop c_{n-1}right)=cdots\\
&=left(1 1atop 1 2right)^nleft(b_1atop c_1right)\\
&=left(0 1atop 1 1right)^{2n}left(b_1atop c_1right)\\
&=left(F_{2n-1} F_{2n} atop F_{2n} F_{2n+1}right)left(1atop 1right)
&&scriptsize(a_1=1Rightarrow b_1=1, c_1=1)\\
&=left(F_{2n-1}+F_{2n} atop F_{2n} +F_{2n+1}right)\\
&=left(F_{2n+1}atop F_{2n+2}right)\\
therefore a_{n+1}&=frac {b_{n+1}}{c_{n+1}}=frac {F_{2n+1}}{F_{2n+2}}\\
color{red}{a_n}&color{red}{=frac {F_{2n} }{F_{2n+1}}qquadblacksquare}
end{align}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    Let $b_n=frac{1}{a_n}$. We have
    $$ b_n = frac{a_n+2}{a_n+1} = frac{2b_n+1}{b_n+1}=1+frac{1}{1+frac{1}{b_n}} $$
    hence in terms of continued fractions we have $b_1=[1], b_2=[1;1,1], b_3=[1;1,1,1,1]$ and so on. The convergents of $varphi=frac{1+sqrt{5}}{2}=[1;overline{1}]$ are given by ratios of consecutive Fibonacci numbers, hence $b_n=frac{F_{2n-1}}{F_{2n+1}}$ and $a_n=frac{F_{2n}}{F_{2n+1}}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks. If a series $c_n$ converges to $phi$ as $nto infty$, can it be concluded that $c_n=frac {F_n}{F_{n+1}}$, since we know that $lim_{ntoinfty}frac {F_n}{F_{n+1}}=phi$, or is this not necessarily the case?
      $endgroup$
      – hypergeometric
      Dec 6 '18 at 6:25






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      That is definitely not always true. For example, each of the series $c_n = dfrac{F_n-1}{F_{n+1}}$, $d_n = dfrac{F_{n+1}}{F_{n+2}}$, $e_n = dfrac{F_n}{F_{n+1}-1000}$, and $f_n = sqrt{dfrac{F_n}{F_{n+2}}}$ converges to $phi = dfrac{sqrt{5}-1}{2}$. There are also many series which converge to $phi$ which aren't expressible in "nice" closed forms.
      $endgroup$
      – JimmyK4542
      Dec 6 '18 at 6:31













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027273%2frecurrence-and-fibonacci-a-n1-frac-1a-n2a-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    Yes, it can be derived directly, assuming some familiarity with the Fibonacci numbers. I am using the initial conditions $F_1=F_2=1$ for the Fibonacci numbers, which impies that
    $$
    a_{n}=frac{F_{2n-1}}{F_{2n}}
    $$



    There is a nice property involving functions of the form
    $$
    f(x) = frac{ax+b}{cx+d}
    $$

    If you compose such an $f$ with another $g(x)=frac{px+q}{sx+t}$ of the same form, the result is another function in the same form, whose coefficients are identical to matrix product of the squares of coefficients of $f$ and $g$:
    $$
    fcirc g = frac{(ap+bs)x+(aq+bt)}{(cp+ds)x+(cq+dt)}
    $$

    Letting
    $$
    f(x)=frac{1+x}{2+x}
    $$

    this implies that
    $$a_n=fcirc fcirc dots circ fbig(1big),$$ with $n-1$ functions composed. Using the matrix connection, and the observation that substituting $x=1$ results in a fraction whose numerator and denominator are the components of the right column of this matrix, this implies that $a_n$ is a fraction whose numerator an denominator are given by the matrix
    $$
    a_n=frac{b_n}{c_n},qquad begin{bmatrix}b_n\c_nend{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}1&1\1&2end{bmatrix}^{n-1}begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}
    =begin{bmatrix}0&1\1&1end{bmatrix}^{2(n-1)}begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}
    $$

    Finally, recall that $begin{bmatrix}0&1\1&1end{bmatrix}$ is the "Fibonacci matrix" which satisfies
    $$
    begin{bmatrix}0&1\1&1end{bmatrix}^n=begin{bmatrix}F_{n-1}&F_n\F_{n}&F_{n+1}end{bmatrix},
    $$

    an identity which follows directly from the recurrence $F_n=F_{n-1}+F_{n-2}$ and base cases $F_0=0,F_1=1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks. Very nice solution (+1). Interesting property of $f(x)$ and clever application.
      $endgroup$
      – hypergeometric
      Dec 5 '18 at 17:02
















    5












    $begingroup$

    Yes, it can be derived directly, assuming some familiarity with the Fibonacci numbers. I am using the initial conditions $F_1=F_2=1$ for the Fibonacci numbers, which impies that
    $$
    a_{n}=frac{F_{2n-1}}{F_{2n}}
    $$



    There is a nice property involving functions of the form
    $$
    f(x) = frac{ax+b}{cx+d}
    $$

    If you compose such an $f$ with another $g(x)=frac{px+q}{sx+t}$ of the same form, the result is another function in the same form, whose coefficients are identical to matrix product of the squares of coefficients of $f$ and $g$:
    $$
    fcirc g = frac{(ap+bs)x+(aq+bt)}{(cp+ds)x+(cq+dt)}
    $$

    Letting
    $$
    f(x)=frac{1+x}{2+x}
    $$

    this implies that
    $$a_n=fcirc fcirc dots circ fbig(1big),$$ with $n-1$ functions composed. Using the matrix connection, and the observation that substituting $x=1$ results in a fraction whose numerator and denominator are the components of the right column of this matrix, this implies that $a_n$ is a fraction whose numerator an denominator are given by the matrix
    $$
    a_n=frac{b_n}{c_n},qquad begin{bmatrix}b_n\c_nend{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}1&1\1&2end{bmatrix}^{n-1}begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}
    =begin{bmatrix}0&1\1&1end{bmatrix}^{2(n-1)}begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}
    $$

    Finally, recall that $begin{bmatrix}0&1\1&1end{bmatrix}$ is the "Fibonacci matrix" which satisfies
    $$
    begin{bmatrix}0&1\1&1end{bmatrix}^n=begin{bmatrix}F_{n-1}&F_n\F_{n}&F_{n+1}end{bmatrix},
    $$

    an identity which follows directly from the recurrence $F_n=F_{n-1}+F_{n-2}$ and base cases $F_0=0,F_1=1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks. Very nice solution (+1). Interesting property of $f(x)$ and clever application.
      $endgroup$
      – hypergeometric
      Dec 5 '18 at 17:02














    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    Yes, it can be derived directly, assuming some familiarity with the Fibonacci numbers. I am using the initial conditions $F_1=F_2=1$ for the Fibonacci numbers, which impies that
    $$
    a_{n}=frac{F_{2n-1}}{F_{2n}}
    $$



    There is a nice property involving functions of the form
    $$
    f(x) = frac{ax+b}{cx+d}
    $$

    If you compose such an $f$ with another $g(x)=frac{px+q}{sx+t}$ of the same form, the result is another function in the same form, whose coefficients are identical to matrix product of the squares of coefficients of $f$ and $g$:
    $$
    fcirc g = frac{(ap+bs)x+(aq+bt)}{(cp+ds)x+(cq+dt)}
    $$

    Letting
    $$
    f(x)=frac{1+x}{2+x}
    $$

    this implies that
    $$a_n=fcirc fcirc dots circ fbig(1big),$$ with $n-1$ functions composed. Using the matrix connection, and the observation that substituting $x=1$ results in a fraction whose numerator and denominator are the components of the right column of this matrix, this implies that $a_n$ is a fraction whose numerator an denominator are given by the matrix
    $$
    a_n=frac{b_n}{c_n},qquad begin{bmatrix}b_n\c_nend{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}1&1\1&2end{bmatrix}^{n-1}begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}
    =begin{bmatrix}0&1\1&1end{bmatrix}^{2(n-1)}begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}
    $$

    Finally, recall that $begin{bmatrix}0&1\1&1end{bmatrix}$ is the "Fibonacci matrix" which satisfies
    $$
    begin{bmatrix}0&1\1&1end{bmatrix}^n=begin{bmatrix}F_{n-1}&F_n\F_{n}&F_{n+1}end{bmatrix},
    $$

    an identity which follows directly from the recurrence $F_n=F_{n-1}+F_{n-2}$ and base cases $F_0=0,F_1=1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Yes, it can be derived directly, assuming some familiarity with the Fibonacci numbers. I am using the initial conditions $F_1=F_2=1$ for the Fibonacci numbers, which impies that
    $$
    a_{n}=frac{F_{2n-1}}{F_{2n}}
    $$



    There is a nice property involving functions of the form
    $$
    f(x) = frac{ax+b}{cx+d}
    $$

    If you compose such an $f$ with another $g(x)=frac{px+q}{sx+t}$ of the same form, the result is another function in the same form, whose coefficients are identical to matrix product of the squares of coefficients of $f$ and $g$:
    $$
    fcirc g = frac{(ap+bs)x+(aq+bt)}{(cp+ds)x+(cq+dt)}
    $$

    Letting
    $$
    f(x)=frac{1+x}{2+x}
    $$

    this implies that
    $$a_n=fcirc fcirc dots circ fbig(1big),$$ with $n-1$ functions composed. Using the matrix connection, and the observation that substituting $x=1$ results in a fraction whose numerator and denominator are the components of the right column of this matrix, this implies that $a_n$ is a fraction whose numerator an denominator are given by the matrix
    $$
    a_n=frac{b_n}{c_n},qquad begin{bmatrix}b_n\c_nend{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}1&1\1&2end{bmatrix}^{n-1}begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}
    =begin{bmatrix}0&1\1&1end{bmatrix}^{2(n-1)}begin{bmatrix}1\0end{bmatrix}
    $$

    Finally, recall that $begin{bmatrix}0&1\1&1end{bmatrix}$ is the "Fibonacci matrix" which satisfies
    $$
    begin{bmatrix}0&1\1&1end{bmatrix}^n=begin{bmatrix}F_{n-1}&F_n\F_{n}&F_{n+1}end{bmatrix},
    $$

    an identity which follows directly from the recurrence $F_n=F_{n-1}+F_{n-2}$ and base cases $F_0=0,F_1=1$.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 5 '18 at 17:03

























    answered Dec 5 '18 at 16:56









    Mike EarnestMike Earnest

    22.1k12051




    22.1k12051












    • $begingroup$
      Thanks. Very nice solution (+1). Interesting property of $f(x)$ and clever application.
      $endgroup$
      – hypergeometric
      Dec 5 '18 at 17:02


















    • $begingroup$
      Thanks. Very nice solution (+1). Interesting property of $f(x)$ and clever application.
      $endgroup$
      – hypergeometric
      Dec 5 '18 at 17:02
















    $begingroup$
    Thanks. Very nice solution (+1). Interesting property of $f(x)$ and clever application.
    $endgroup$
    – hypergeometric
    Dec 5 '18 at 17:02




    $begingroup$
    Thanks. Very nice solution (+1). Interesting property of $f(x)$ and clever application.
    $endgroup$
    – hypergeometric
    Dec 5 '18 at 17:02











    8












    $begingroup$

    Hint:
    By letting $2+a_n=frac{b_{n+1}}{b_n}$, we get
    $$frac{b_{n+2}}{b_{n+1}}-2 = 1 - frac{b_{n}}{b_{n+1}} implies b_{n+2} -3b_{n+1} + b_{n} = 0.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks (+1). Nice hint. At least that gets us to a nice linear recurrence relation.
      $endgroup$
      – hypergeometric
      Dec 5 '18 at 16:55










    • $begingroup$
      clever substitution (+1)
      $endgroup$
      – G Cab
      Dec 5 '18 at 17:31
















    8












    $begingroup$

    Hint:
    By letting $2+a_n=frac{b_{n+1}}{b_n}$, we get
    $$frac{b_{n+2}}{b_{n+1}}-2 = 1 - frac{b_{n}}{b_{n+1}} implies b_{n+2} -3b_{n+1} + b_{n} = 0.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks (+1). Nice hint. At least that gets us to a nice linear recurrence relation.
      $endgroup$
      – hypergeometric
      Dec 5 '18 at 16:55










    • $begingroup$
      clever substitution (+1)
      $endgroup$
      – G Cab
      Dec 5 '18 at 17:31














    8












    8








    8





    $begingroup$

    Hint:
    By letting $2+a_n=frac{b_{n+1}}{b_n}$, we get
    $$frac{b_{n+2}}{b_{n+1}}-2 = 1 - frac{b_{n}}{b_{n+1}} implies b_{n+2} -3b_{n+1} + b_{n} = 0.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Hint:
    By letting $2+a_n=frac{b_{n+1}}{b_n}$, we get
    $$frac{b_{n+2}}{b_{n+1}}-2 = 1 - frac{b_{n}}{b_{n+1}} implies b_{n+2} -3b_{n+1} + b_{n} = 0.$$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Dec 5 '18 at 16:28









    Math LoverMath Lover

    13.9k31436




    13.9k31436












    • $begingroup$
      Thanks (+1). Nice hint. At least that gets us to a nice linear recurrence relation.
      $endgroup$
      – hypergeometric
      Dec 5 '18 at 16:55










    • $begingroup$
      clever substitution (+1)
      $endgroup$
      – G Cab
      Dec 5 '18 at 17:31


















    • $begingroup$
      Thanks (+1). Nice hint. At least that gets us to a nice linear recurrence relation.
      $endgroup$
      – hypergeometric
      Dec 5 '18 at 16:55










    • $begingroup$
      clever substitution (+1)
      $endgroup$
      – G Cab
      Dec 5 '18 at 17:31
















    $begingroup$
    Thanks (+1). Nice hint. At least that gets us to a nice linear recurrence relation.
    $endgroup$
    – hypergeometric
    Dec 5 '18 at 16:55




    $begingroup$
    Thanks (+1). Nice hint. At least that gets us to a nice linear recurrence relation.
    $endgroup$
    – hypergeometric
    Dec 5 '18 at 16:55












    $begingroup$
    clever substitution (+1)
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    Dec 5 '18 at 17:31




    $begingroup$
    clever substitution (+1)
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    Dec 5 '18 at 17:31











    1












    $begingroup$

    [My interpretation of Mike Earnest's solution, posted here for my own reference only]



    $$begin{align}
    a_{n+1}&=frac {b_{n+1}}{c_{n+1}}=frac {1+frac {b_n}{c_n}}{2+frac {b_n}{c_n}}=frac {b_n+c_n}{b_n+2c_n}\\
    left(b_{n+1}atop c_{n+1}right)
    &=left(1 1atop 1 2right)left(b_{n}atop c_{n}right)
    =left(1 1atop 1 2right)^2left(b_{n-1}atop c_{n-1}right)=cdots\\
    &=left(1 1atop 1 2right)^nleft(b_1atop c_1right)\\
    &=left(0 1atop 1 1right)^{2n}left(b_1atop c_1right)\\
    &=left(F_{2n-1} F_{2n} atop F_{2n} F_{2n+1}right)left(1atop 1right)
    &&scriptsize(a_1=1Rightarrow b_1=1, c_1=1)\\
    &=left(F_{2n-1}+F_{2n} atop F_{2n} +F_{2n+1}right)\\
    &=left(F_{2n+1}atop F_{2n+2}right)\\
    therefore a_{n+1}&=frac {b_{n+1}}{c_{n+1}}=frac {F_{2n+1}}{F_{2n+2}}\\
    color{red}{a_n}&color{red}{=frac {F_{2n} }{F_{2n+1}}qquadblacksquare}
    end{align}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      [My interpretation of Mike Earnest's solution, posted here for my own reference only]



      $$begin{align}
      a_{n+1}&=frac {b_{n+1}}{c_{n+1}}=frac {1+frac {b_n}{c_n}}{2+frac {b_n}{c_n}}=frac {b_n+c_n}{b_n+2c_n}\\
      left(b_{n+1}atop c_{n+1}right)
      &=left(1 1atop 1 2right)left(b_{n}atop c_{n}right)
      =left(1 1atop 1 2right)^2left(b_{n-1}atop c_{n-1}right)=cdots\\
      &=left(1 1atop 1 2right)^nleft(b_1atop c_1right)\\
      &=left(0 1atop 1 1right)^{2n}left(b_1atop c_1right)\\
      &=left(F_{2n-1} F_{2n} atop F_{2n} F_{2n+1}right)left(1atop 1right)
      &&scriptsize(a_1=1Rightarrow b_1=1, c_1=1)\\
      &=left(F_{2n-1}+F_{2n} atop F_{2n} +F_{2n+1}right)\\
      &=left(F_{2n+1}atop F_{2n+2}right)\\
      therefore a_{n+1}&=frac {b_{n+1}}{c_{n+1}}=frac {F_{2n+1}}{F_{2n+2}}\\
      color{red}{a_n}&color{red}{=frac {F_{2n} }{F_{2n+1}}qquadblacksquare}
      end{align}$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        [My interpretation of Mike Earnest's solution, posted here for my own reference only]



        $$begin{align}
        a_{n+1}&=frac {b_{n+1}}{c_{n+1}}=frac {1+frac {b_n}{c_n}}{2+frac {b_n}{c_n}}=frac {b_n+c_n}{b_n+2c_n}\\
        left(b_{n+1}atop c_{n+1}right)
        &=left(1 1atop 1 2right)left(b_{n}atop c_{n}right)
        =left(1 1atop 1 2right)^2left(b_{n-1}atop c_{n-1}right)=cdots\\
        &=left(1 1atop 1 2right)^nleft(b_1atop c_1right)\\
        &=left(0 1atop 1 1right)^{2n}left(b_1atop c_1right)\\
        &=left(F_{2n-1} F_{2n} atop F_{2n} F_{2n+1}right)left(1atop 1right)
        &&scriptsize(a_1=1Rightarrow b_1=1, c_1=1)\\
        &=left(F_{2n-1}+F_{2n} atop F_{2n} +F_{2n+1}right)\\
        &=left(F_{2n+1}atop F_{2n+2}right)\\
        therefore a_{n+1}&=frac {b_{n+1}}{c_{n+1}}=frac {F_{2n+1}}{F_{2n+2}}\\
        color{red}{a_n}&color{red}{=frac {F_{2n} }{F_{2n+1}}qquadblacksquare}
        end{align}$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        [My interpretation of Mike Earnest's solution, posted here for my own reference only]



        $$begin{align}
        a_{n+1}&=frac {b_{n+1}}{c_{n+1}}=frac {1+frac {b_n}{c_n}}{2+frac {b_n}{c_n}}=frac {b_n+c_n}{b_n+2c_n}\\
        left(b_{n+1}atop c_{n+1}right)
        &=left(1 1atop 1 2right)left(b_{n}atop c_{n}right)
        =left(1 1atop 1 2right)^2left(b_{n-1}atop c_{n-1}right)=cdots\\
        &=left(1 1atop 1 2right)^nleft(b_1atop c_1right)\\
        &=left(0 1atop 1 1right)^{2n}left(b_1atop c_1right)\\
        &=left(F_{2n-1} F_{2n} atop F_{2n} F_{2n+1}right)left(1atop 1right)
        &&scriptsize(a_1=1Rightarrow b_1=1, c_1=1)\\
        &=left(F_{2n-1}+F_{2n} atop F_{2n} +F_{2n+1}right)\\
        &=left(F_{2n+1}atop F_{2n+2}right)\\
        therefore a_{n+1}&=frac {b_{n+1}}{c_{n+1}}=frac {F_{2n+1}}{F_{2n+2}}\\
        color{red}{a_n}&color{red}{=frac {F_{2n} }{F_{2n+1}}qquadblacksquare}
        end{align}$$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 6 '18 at 6:27

























        answered Dec 5 '18 at 20:00









        hypergeometrichypergeometric

        17.7k1758




        17.7k1758























            0












            $begingroup$

            Let $b_n=frac{1}{a_n}$. We have
            $$ b_n = frac{a_n+2}{a_n+1} = frac{2b_n+1}{b_n+1}=1+frac{1}{1+frac{1}{b_n}} $$
            hence in terms of continued fractions we have $b_1=[1], b_2=[1;1,1], b_3=[1;1,1,1,1]$ and so on. The convergents of $varphi=frac{1+sqrt{5}}{2}=[1;overline{1}]$ are given by ratios of consecutive Fibonacci numbers, hence $b_n=frac{F_{2n-1}}{F_{2n+1}}$ and $a_n=frac{F_{2n}}{F_{2n+1}}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks. If a series $c_n$ converges to $phi$ as $nto infty$, can it be concluded that $c_n=frac {F_n}{F_{n+1}}$, since we know that $lim_{ntoinfty}frac {F_n}{F_{n+1}}=phi$, or is this not necessarily the case?
              $endgroup$
              – hypergeometric
              Dec 6 '18 at 6:25






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              That is definitely not always true. For example, each of the series $c_n = dfrac{F_n-1}{F_{n+1}}$, $d_n = dfrac{F_{n+1}}{F_{n+2}}$, $e_n = dfrac{F_n}{F_{n+1}-1000}$, and $f_n = sqrt{dfrac{F_n}{F_{n+2}}}$ converges to $phi = dfrac{sqrt{5}-1}{2}$. There are also many series which converge to $phi$ which aren't expressible in "nice" closed forms.
              $endgroup$
              – JimmyK4542
              Dec 6 '18 at 6:31


















            0












            $begingroup$

            Let $b_n=frac{1}{a_n}$. We have
            $$ b_n = frac{a_n+2}{a_n+1} = frac{2b_n+1}{b_n+1}=1+frac{1}{1+frac{1}{b_n}} $$
            hence in terms of continued fractions we have $b_1=[1], b_2=[1;1,1], b_3=[1;1,1,1,1]$ and so on. The convergents of $varphi=frac{1+sqrt{5}}{2}=[1;overline{1}]$ are given by ratios of consecutive Fibonacci numbers, hence $b_n=frac{F_{2n-1}}{F_{2n+1}}$ and $a_n=frac{F_{2n}}{F_{2n+1}}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks. If a series $c_n$ converges to $phi$ as $nto infty$, can it be concluded that $c_n=frac {F_n}{F_{n+1}}$, since we know that $lim_{ntoinfty}frac {F_n}{F_{n+1}}=phi$, or is this not necessarily the case?
              $endgroup$
              – hypergeometric
              Dec 6 '18 at 6:25






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              That is definitely not always true. For example, each of the series $c_n = dfrac{F_n-1}{F_{n+1}}$, $d_n = dfrac{F_{n+1}}{F_{n+2}}$, $e_n = dfrac{F_n}{F_{n+1}-1000}$, and $f_n = sqrt{dfrac{F_n}{F_{n+2}}}$ converges to $phi = dfrac{sqrt{5}-1}{2}$. There are also many series which converge to $phi$ which aren't expressible in "nice" closed forms.
              $endgroup$
              – JimmyK4542
              Dec 6 '18 at 6:31
















            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Let $b_n=frac{1}{a_n}$. We have
            $$ b_n = frac{a_n+2}{a_n+1} = frac{2b_n+1}{b_n+1}=1+frac{1}{1+frac{1}{b_n}} $$
            hence in terms of continued fractions we have $b_1=[1], b_2=[1;1,1], b_3=[1;1,1,1,1]$ and so on. The convergents of $varphi=frac{1+sqrt{5}}{2}=[1;overline{1}]$ are given by ratios of consecutive Fibonacci numbers, hence $b_n=frac{F_{2n-1}}{F_{2n+1}}$ and $a_n=frac{F_{2n}}{F_{2n+1}}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Let $b_n=frac{1}{a_n}$. We have
            $$ b_n = frac{a_n+2}{a_n+1} = frac{2b_n+1}{b_n+1}=1+frac{1}{1+frac{1}{b_n}} $$
            hence in terms of continued fractions we have $b_1=[1], b_2=[1;1,1], b_3=[1;1,1,1,1]$ and so on. The convergents of $varphi=frac{1+sqrt{5}}{2}=[1;overline{1}]$ are given by ratios of consecutive Fibonacci numbers, hence $b_n=frac{F_{2n-1}}{F_{2n+1}}$ and $a_n=frac{F_{2n}}{F_{2n+1}}$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 5 '18 at 23:04









            Jack D'AurizioJack D'Aurizio

            1




            1












            • $begingroup$
              Thanks. If a series $c_n$ converges to $phi$ as $nto infty$, can it be concluded that $c_n=frac {F_n}{F_{n+1}}$, since we know that $lim_{ntoinfty}frac {F_n}{F_{n+1}}=phi$, or is this not necessarily the case?
              $endgroup$
              – hypergeometric
              Dec 6 '18 at 6:25






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              That is definitely not always true. For example, each of the series $c_n = dfrac{F_n-1}{F_{n+1}}$, $d_n = dfrac{F_{n+1}}{F_{n+2}}$, $e_n = dfrac{F_n}{F_{n+1}-1000}$, and $f_n = sqrt{dfrac{F_n}{F_{n+2}}}$ converges to $phi = dfrac{sqrt{5}-1}{2}$. There are also many series which converge to $phi$ which aren't expressible in "nice" closed forms.
              $endgroup$
              – JimmyK4542
              Dec 6 '18 at 6:31




















            • $begingroup$
              Thanks. If a series $c_n$ converges to $phi$ as $nto infty$, can it be concluded that $c_n=frac {F_n}{F_{n+1}}$, since we know that $lim_{ntoinfty}frac {F_n}{F_{n+1}}=phi$, or is this not necessarily the case?
              $endgroup$
              – hypergeometric
              Dec 6 '18 at 6:25






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              That is definitely not always true. For example, each of the series $c_n = dfrac{F_n-1}{F_{n+1}}$, $d_n = dfrac{F_{n+1}}{F_{n+2}}$, $e_n = dfrac{F_n}{F_{n+1}-1000}$, and $f_n = sqrt{dfrac{F_n}{F_{n+2}}}$ converges to $phi = dfrac{sqrt{5}-1}{2}$. There are also many series which converge to $phi$ which aren't expressible in "nice" closed forms.
              $endgroup$
              – JimmyK4542
              Dec 6 '18 at 6:31


















            $begingroup$
            Thanks. If a series $c_n$ converges to $phi$ as $nto infty$, can it be concluded that $c_n=frac {F_n}{F_{n+1}}$, since we know that $lim_{ntoinfty}frac {F_n}{F_{n+1}}=phi$, or is this not necessarily the case?
            $endgroup$
            – hypergeometric
            Dec 6 '18 at 6:25




            $begingroup$
            Thanks. If a series $c_n$ converges to $phi$ as $nto infty$, can it be concluded that $c_n=frac {F_n}{F_{n+1}}$, since we know that $lim_{ntoinfty}frac {F_n}{F_{n+1}}=phi$, or is this not necessarily the case?
            $endgroup$
            – hypergeometric
            Dec 6 '18 at 6:25




            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            That is definitely not always true. For example, each of the series $c_n = dfrac{F_n-1}{F_{n+1}}$, $d_n = dfrac{F_{n+1}}{F_{n+2}}$, $e_n = dfrac{F_n}{F_{n+1}-1000}$, and $f_n = sqrt{dfrac{F_n}{F_{n+2}}}$ converges to $phi = dfrac{sqrt{5}-1}{2}$. There are also many series which converge to $phi$ which aren't expressible in "nice" closed forms.
            $endgroup$
            – JimmyK4542
            Dec 6 '18 at 6:31






            $begingroup$
            That is definitely not always true. For example, each of the series $c_n = dfrac{F_n-1}{F_{n+1}}$, $d_n = dfrac{F_{n+1}}{F_{n+2}}$, $e_n = dfrac{F_n}{F_{n+1}-1000}$, and $f_n = sqrt{dfrac{F_n}{F_{n+2}}}$ converges to $phi = dfrac{sqrt{5}-1}{2}$. There are also many series which converge to $phi$ which aren't expressible in "nice" closed forms.
            $endgroup$
            – JimmyK4542
            Dec 6 '18 at 6:31




















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027273%2frecurrence-and-fibonacci-a-n1-frac-1a-n2a-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten