If the category of elements of a presheave has terminal object, then it is representable.












0














Let $F$ be a presheave on a category $C$. If $F$ is representable, then there is a $B in C$ such that $F=Hom(-,B)$. Then, it is not hard to prove that its category of elements $E(F)$ is equivalent to the slice category $C_{/ B}$.



Is it true that if the category of elements $E(F)$ of $F$ has a terminal object, then $F$ is representable? If so, how do I prove it?










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    Let $F$ be a presheave on a category $C$. If $F$ is representable, then there is a $B in C$ such that $F=Hom(-,B)$. Then, it is not hard to prove that its category of elements $E(F)$ is equivalent to the slice category $C_{/ B}$.



    Is it true that if the category of elements $E(F)$ of $F$ has a terminal object, then $F$ is representable? If so, how do I prove it?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      Let $F$ be a presheave on a category $C$. If $F$ is representable, then there is a $B in C$ such that $F=Hom(-,B)$. Then, it is not hard to prove that its category of elements $E(F)$ is equivalent to the slice category $C_{/ B}$.



      Is it true that if the category of elements $E(F)$ of $F$ has a terminal object, then $F$ is representable? If so, how do I prove it?










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $F$ be a presheave on a category $C$. If $F$ is representable, then there is a $B in C$ such that $F=Hom(-,B)$. Then, it is not hard to prove that its category of elements $E(F)$ is equivalent to the slice category $C_{/ B}$.



      Is it true that if the category of elements $E(F)$ of $F$ has a terminal object, then $F$ is representable? If so, how do I prove it?







      category-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 29 '18 at 15:58









      H RH R

      1608




      1608






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          Yes, this is true.



          Suppose that $E(F)$ has a terminal object $(B, y)$, and define $theta : F to mathsf{y}(B)$ as follows. Given $A in mathrm{ob}(mathcal{C})$, define
          $$theta_A : FA to mathrm{Hom}_{mathcal{C}}(A,B)$$
          by letting $theta_A(x)$ be the unique $f : A to B$ given by the (unique) morphism $(A,x) to (B,y)$ in $E(F)$.



          Verify that $theta$ is a natural isomorphism.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Could you tell me the definition of $y(B)$?
            – H R
            Nov 29 '18 at 16:18










          • Yes, $mathsf{y}$ is the Yoneda embedding, i.e. $mathsf{y}(B) = mathrm{Hom}_{mathcal{C}}({-}, B)$.
            – Clive Newstead
            Nov 29 '18 at 17:00





















          2














          For a presheaf $F$ on $mathcal C$, recall that $E(F)$ is defined as the category whose objects are $(c,x)$ where $cin mathcal C$ and $xin F(c)$, and whose morphisms $(c,x) to (c',x')$ are those $f:cto c'$ in $mathcal C$ such that $F(f)(x') = x$.



          One consequence of the Yoneda lemma is that $$F simeq mathrm{colim}_{(x,c)in E(F)} mathsf y(c) tag{1}$$ (where I use the same notation as Clive for the Yoneda embedding). Now suppose that there is a terminal object $(c_t,x_t)$ in $E(F)$: a colimit taken over a category with a terminal object is just the value of the diagram at that terminal object. Hence $Fsimeq mathsf y (c_t)$.



          (Of course the detail of the proof of (1) should fall back to Clive's answer.)






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018820%2fif-the-category-of-elements-of-a-presheave-has-terminal-object-then-it-is-repre%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            Yes, this is true.



            Suppose that $E(F)$ has a terminal object $(B, y)$, and define $theta : F to mathsf{y}(B)$ as follows. Given $A in mathrm{ob}(mathcal{C})$, define
            $$theta_A : FA to mathrm{Hom}_{mathcal{C}}(A,B)$$
            by letting $theta_A(x)$ be the unique $f : A to B$ given by the (unique) morphism $(A,x) to (B,y)$ in $E(F)$.



            Verify that $theta$ is a natural isomorphism.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Could you tell me the definition of $y(B)$?
              – H R
              Nov 29 '18 at 16:18










            • Yes, $mathsf{y}$ is the Yoneda embedding, i.e. $mathsf{y}(B) = mathrm{Hom}_{mathcal{C}}({-}, B)$.
              – Clive Newstead
              Nov 29 '18 at 17:00


















            2














            Yes, this is true.



            Suppose that $E(F)$ has a terminal object $(B, y)$, and define $theta : F to mathsf{y}(B)$ as follows. Given $A in mathrm{ob}(mathcal{C})$, define
            $$theta_A : FA to mathrm{Hom}_{mathcal{C}}(A,B)$$
            by letting $theta_A(x)$ be the unique $f : A to B$ given by the (unique) morphism $(A,x) to (B,y)$ in $E(F)$.



            Verify that $theta$ is a natural isomorphism.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Could you tell me the definition of $y(B)$?
              – H R
              Nov 29 '18 at 16:18










            • Yes, $mathsf{y}$ is the Yoneda embedding, i.e. $mathsf{y}(B) = mathrm{Hom}_{mathcal{C}}({-}, B)$.
              – Clive Newstead
              Nov 29 '18 at 17:00
















            2












            2








            2






            Yes, this is true.



            Suppose that $E(F)$ has a terminal object $(B, y)$, and define $theta : F to mathsf{y}(B)$ as follows. Given $A in mathrm{ob}(mathcal{C})$, define
            $$theta_A : FA to mathrm{Hom}_{mathcal{C}}(A,B)$$
            by letting $theta_A(x)$ be the unique $f : A to B$ given by the (unique) morphism $(A,x) to (B,y)$ in $E(F)$.



            Verify that $theta$ is a natural isomorphism.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Yes, this is true.



            Suppose that $E(F)$ has a terminal object $(B, y)$, and define $theta : F to mathsf{y}(B)$ as follows. Given $A in mathrm{ob}(mathcal{C})$, define
            $$theta_A : FA to mathrm{Hom}_{mathcal{C}}(A,B)$$
            by letting $theta_A(x)$ be the unique $f : A to B$ given by the (unique) morphism $(A,x) to (B,y)$ in $E(F)$.



            Verify that $theta$ is a natural isomorphism.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 29 '18 at 17:00

























            answered Nov 29 '18 at 16:05









            Clive NewsteadClive Newstead

            50.7k474133




            50.7k474133












            • Could you tell me the definition of $y(B)$?
              – H R
              Nov 29 '18 at 16:18










            • Yes, $mathsf{y}$ is the Yoneda embedding, i.e. $mathsf{y}(B) = mathrm{Hom}_{mathcal{C}}({-}, B)$.
              – Clive Newstead
              Nov 29 '18 at 17:00




















            • Could you tell me the definition of $y(B)$?
              – H R
              Nov 29 '18 at 16:18










            • Yes, $mathsf{y}$ is the Yoneda embedding, i.e. $mathsf{y}(B) = mathrm{Hom}_{mathcal{C}}({-}, B)$.
              – Clive Newstead
              Nov 29 '18 at 17:00


















            Could you tell me the definition of $y(B)$?
            – H R
            Nov 29 '18 at 16:18




            Could you tell me the definition of $y(B)$?
            – H R
            Nov 29 '18 at 16:18












            Yes, $mathsf{y}$ is the Yoneda embedding, i.e. $mathsf{y}(B) = mathrm{Hom}_{mathcal{C}}({-}, B)$.
            – Clive Newstead
            Nov 29 '18 at 17:00






            Yes, $mathsf{y}$ is the Yoneda embedding, i.e. $mathsf{y}(B) = mathrm{Hom}_{mathcal{C}}({-}, B)$.
            – Clive Newstead
            Nov 29 '18 at 17:00













            2














            For a presheaf $F$ on $mathcal C$, recall that $E(F)$ is defined as the category whose objects are $(c,x)$ where $cin mathcal C$ and $xin F(c)$, and whose morphisms $(c,x) to (c',x')$ are those $f:cto c'$ in $mathcal C$ such that $F(f)(x') = x$.



            One consequence of the Yoneda lemma is that $$F simeq mathrm{colim}_{(x,c)in E(F)} mathsf y(c) tag{1}$$ (where I use the same notation as Clive for the Yoneda embedding). Now suppose that there is a terminal object $(c_t,x_t)$ in $E(F)$: a colimit taken over a category with a terminal object is just the value of the diagram at that terminal object. Hence $Fsimeq mathsf y (c_t)$.



            (Of course the detail of the proof of (1) should fall back to Clive's answer.)






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              2














              For a presheaf $F$ on $mathcal C$, recall that $E(F)$ is defined as the category whose objects are $(c,x)$ where $cin mathcal C$ and $xin F(c)$, and whose morphisms $(c,x) to (c',x')$ are those $f:cto c'$ in $mathcal C$ such that $F(f)(x') = x$.



              One consequence of the Yoneda lemma is that $$F simeq mathrm{colim}_{(x,c)in E(F)} mathsf y(c) tag{1}$$ (where I use the same notation as Clive for the Yoneda embedding). Now suppose that there is a terminal object $(c_t,x_t)$ in $E(F)$: a colimit taken over a category with a terminal object is just the value of the diagram at that terminal object. Hence $Fsimeq mathsf y (c_t)$.



              (Of course the detail of the proof of (1) should fall back to Clive's answer.)






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                2












                2








                2






                For a presheaf $F$ on $mathcal C$, recall that $E(F)$ is defined as the category whose objects are $(c,x)$ where $cin mathcal C$ and $xin F(c)$, and whose morphisms $(c,x) to (c',x')$ are those $f:cto c'$ in $mathcal C$ such that $F(f)(x') = x$.



                One consequence of the Yoneda lemma is that $$F simeq mathrm{colim}_{(x,c)in E(F)} mathsf y(c) tag{1}$$ (where I use the same notation as Clive for the Yoneda embedding). Now suppose that there is a terminal object $(c_t,x_t)$ in $E(F)$: a colimit taken over a category with a terminal object is just the value of the diagram at that terminal object. Hence $Fsimeq mathsf y (c_t)$.



                (Of course the detail of the proof of (1) should fall back to Clive's answer.)






                share|cite|improve this answer












                For a presheaf $F$ on $mathcal C$, recall that $E(F)$ is defined as the category whose objects are $(c,x)$ where $cin mathcal C$ and $xin F(c)$, and whose morphisms $(c,x) to (c',x')$ are those $f:cto c'$ in $mathcal C$ such that $F(f)(x') = x$.



                One consequence of the Yoneda lemma is that $$F simeq mathrm{colim}_{(x,c)in E(F)} mathsf y(c) tag{1}$$ (where I use the same notation as Clive for the Yoneda embedding). Now suppose that there is a terminal object $(c_t,x_t)$ in $E(F)$: a colimit taken over a category with a terminal object is just the value of the diagram at that terminal object. Hence $Fsimeq mathsf y (c_t)$.



                (Of course the detail of the proof of (1) should fall back to Clive's answer.)







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 29 '18 at 18:34









                PecePece

                8,19011141




                8,19011141






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018820%2fif-the-category-of-elements-of-a-presheave-has-terminal-object-then-it-is-repre%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bundesstraße 106

                    Verónica Boquete

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten