If $limlimits_{nto infty}|x_n|= 0$ then $suplimits_{ngeq 1}|x_n|<infty$












1














I'm self-studying Functional analysis and in one of the proofs, I have the following conclusion which I don't quite understand.




If $limlimits_{nto infty}|x_n|= 0$ then $suplimits_{ngeq 1}|x_n|<infty$




I suppose $limlimits_{nto infty}|x_n|= 0$ implies that $|x_n|<epsilon,;;forall,ngeq N,$ for some $N$. So, taking sup over ${x_n}_{ngeq N},$ we have
begin{align} suplimits_{ngeq N}|x_n|leqepsilon<infty.end{align}
So, how come the result? Could someone explain?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Mike.You forgot the $1le n lt N$ elements |x_n|.Does this change anything?
    – Peter Szilas
    Nov 29 '18 at 15:35










  • @Peter Szilas: Didn't realize that! Thanks!
    – Omojola Micheal
    Nov 29 '18 at 15:36










  • Small matter:)Welcome.
    – Peter Szilas
    Nov 29 '18 at 15:39
















1














I'm self-studying Functional analysis and in one of the proofs, I have the following conclusion which I don't quite understand.




If $limlimits_{nto infty}|x_n|= 0$ then $suplimits_{ngeq 1}|x_n|<infty$




I suppose $limlimits_{nto infty}|x_n|= 0$ implies that $|x_n|<epsilon,;;forall,ngeq N,$ for some $N$. So, taking sup over ${x_n}_{ngeq N},$ we have
begin{align} suplimits_{ngeq N}|x_n|leqepsilon<infty.end{align}
So, how come the result? Could someone explain?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Mike.You forgot the $1le n lt N$ elements |x_n|.Does this change anything?
    – Peter Szilas
    Nov 29 '18 at 15:35










  • @Peter Szilas: Didn't realize that! Thanks!
    – Omojola Micheal
    Nov 29 '18 at 15:36










  • Small matter:)Welcome.
    – Peter Szilas
    Nov 29 '18 at 15:39














1












1








1


1





I'm self-studying Functional analysis and in one of the proofs, I have the following conclusion which I don't quite understand.




If $limlimits_{nto infty}|x_n|= 0$ then $suplimits_{ngeq 1}|x_n|<infty$




I suppose $limlimits_{nto infty}|x_n|= 0$ implies that $|x_n|<epsilon,;;forall,ngeq N,$ for some $N$. So, taking sup over ${x_n}_{ngeq N},$ we have
begin{align} suplimits_{ngeq N}|x_n|leqepsilon<infty.end{align}
So, how come the result? Could someone explain?










share|cite|improve this question















I'm self-studying Functional analysis and in one of the proofs, I have the following conclusion which I don't quite understand.




If $limlimits_{nto infty}|x_n|= 0$ then $suplimits_{ngeq 1}|x_n|<infty$




I suppose $limlimits_{nto infty}|x_n|= 0$ implies that $|x_n|<epsilon,;;forall,ngeq N,$ for some $N$. So, taking sup over ${x_n}_{ngeq N},$ we have
begin{align} suplimits_{ngeq N}|x_n|leqepsilon<infty.end{align}
So, how come the result? Could someone explain?







real-analysis functional-analysis limits analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 29 '18 at 15:43







Omojola Micheal

















asked Nov 29 '18 at 15:30









Omojola MichealOmojola Micheal

1,591322




1,591322












  • Mike.You forgot the $1le n lt N$ elements |x_n|.Does this change anything?
    – Peter Szilas
    Nov 29 '18 at 15:35










  • @Peter Szilas: Didn't realize that! Thanks!
    – Omojola Micheal
    Nov 29 '18 at 15:36










  • Small matter:)Welcome.
    – Peter Szilas
    Nov 29 '18 at 15:39


















  • Mike.You forgot the $1le n lt N$ elements |x_n|.Does this change anything?
    – Peter Szilas
    Nov 29 '18 at 15:35










  • @Peter Szilas: Didn't realize that! Thanks!
    – Omojola Micheal
    Nov 29 '18 at 15:36










  • Small matter:)Welcome.
    – Peter Szilas
    Nov 29 '18 at 15:39
















Mike.You forgot the $1le n lt N$ elements |x_n|.Does this change anything?
– Peter Szilas
Nov 29 '18 at 15:35




Mike.You forgot the $1le n lt N$ elements |x_n|.Does this change anything?
– Peter Szilas
Nov 29 '18 at 15:35












@Peter Szilas: Didn't realize that! Thanks!
– Omojola Micheal
Nov 29 '18 at 15:36




@Peter Szilas: Didn't realize that! Thanks!
– Omojola Micheal
Nov 29 '18 at 15:36












Small matter:)Welcome.
– Peter Szilas
Nov 29 '18 at 15:39




Small matter:)Welcome.
– Peter Szilas
Nov 29 '18 at 15:39










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














Since $x_n to 0$ then exists $bar n$ such that forall $n ge bar n$



$$0le |a_n|le 1$$



now take



$$a_{max}=max{|a_n|:n=1,2,ldots,bar n}$$



and indicate with $M=max{1,a_{max}}$ then



$$0le |a_n|le M$$






share|cite|improve this answer





























    1














    Hint: there are finitely many terms $a_n$ with $n<N.$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018776%2fif-lim-limits-n-to-inftyx-n-0-then-sup-limits-n-geq-1x-n-infty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      Since $x_n to 0$ then exists $bar n$ such that forall $n ge bar n$



      $$0le |a_n|le 1$$



      now take



      $$a_{max}=max{|a_n|:n=1,2,ldots,bar n}$$



      and indicate with $M=max{1,a_{max}}$ then



      $$0le |a_n|le M$$






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        1














        Since $x_n to 0$ then exists $bar n$ such that forall $n ge bar n$



        $$0le |a_n|le 1$$



        now take



        $$a_{max}=max{|a_n|:n=1,2,ldots,bar n}$$



        and indicate with $M=max{1,a_{max}}$ then



        $$0le |a_n|le M$$






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          1












          1








          1






          Since $x_n to 0$ then exists $bar n$ such that forall $n ge bar n$



          $$0le |a_n|le 1$$



          now take



          $$a_{max}=max{|a_n|:n=1,2,ldots,bar n}$$



          and indicate with $M=max{1,a_{max}}$ then



          $$0le |a_n|le M$$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Since $x_n to 0$ then exists $bar n$ such that forall $n ge bar n$



          $$0le |a_n|le 1$$



          now take



          $$a_{max}=max{|a_n|:n=1,2,ldots,bar n}$$



          and indicate with $M=max{1,a_{max}}$ then



          $$0le |a_n|le M$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 29 '18 at 15:39









          gimusigimusi

          1




          1























              1














              Hint: there are finitely many terms $a_n$ with $n<N.$






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                1














                Hint: there are finitely many terms $a_n$ with $n<N.$






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  1












                  1








                  1






                  Hint: there are finitely many terms $a_n$ with $n<N.$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Hint: there are finitely many terms $a_n$ with $n<N.$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 29 '18 at 15:32









                  szw1710szw1710

                  6,4101123




                  6,4101123






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018776%2fif-lim-limits-n-to-inftyx-n-0-then-sup-limits-n-geq-1x-n-infty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Le Mesnil-Réaume

                      Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                      web3.py web3.isConnected() returns false always