A problem with the command nccurve
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
usepackage[utf8]{vietnam}
usepackage{pstricks,pst-node} % required package
usepackage{auto-pst-pdf}
begin{document}
begin{pspicture}
psmatrix[linecolor=red,mnode=Circle,radius=3mm,colsep=1.25cm,rowsep=1.25cm]
[name=2] 2 & & [name=3] 3 \
&[name=5] 5 \
[name=1] 1 & & [name=4] 4
psset{linecolor=blue,arrowscale=1.5}
ncline{->}{3}{2}
ncline{->}{4}{3}
ncline{->}{4}{5}
ncline{->}{5}{3}
ncline{->}{5}{1}
ncline{->}{1}{4}
nccurve[angleA=80,angleB=25,ncurv=5]{->}{3}{3}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{1}{2}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{2}{1}
endpsmatrix
end{pspicture}
end{document}
How to draw Picture 1 like as Picture 2?(I see, 2 is more beautiful than 1)
How to compact ncline
or we can only typing manually? It means is there a macro like as ncline{->}{3}{2}{->}{4}{3}{->}{4}{5}...
?
Picture 1:
Picture 2:
The code of Picture 2 ( use tikz )
documentclass[tikz,border=3mm]{standalone}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
[every node/.style={circle,draw=red},
every path/.style={blue,-latex,thick}]
defa{2}
node (5) at (0,0) {$5$};
node (1) at (-a,-a) {$1$};
node (2) at (-a,a) {$2$};
node (3) at (a,a) {$3$};
node (4) at (a,-a) {$4$};
draw (1)--(4); draw (4)--(3);
draw (3)--(2); draw (5)--(3);
draw (5)--(1); draw (4)--(5);
draw (2) to[out=-70,in=70] (1);
draw (1) to[out=110,in=-110] (2);
draw (3) .. controls +(80:1) and +(30:1) .. (3); % <<<---- notice!
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
pstricks pst-node psmatrix
add a comment |
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
usepackage[utf8]{vietnam}
usepackage{pstricks,pst-node} % required package
usepackage{auto-pst-pdf}
begin{document}
begin{pspicture}
psmatrix[linecolor=red,mnode=Circle,radius=3mm,colsep=1.25cm,rowsep=1.25cm]
[name=2] 2 & & [name=3] 3 \
&[name=5] 5 \
[name=1] 1 & & [name=4] 4
psset{linecolor=blue,arrowscale=1.5}
ncline{->}{3}{2}
ncline{->}{4}{3}
ncline{->}{4}{5}
ncline{->}{5}{3}
ncline{->}{5}{1}
ncline{->}{1}{4}
nccurve[angleA=80,angleB=25,ncurv=5]{->}{3}{3}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{1}{2}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{2}{1}
endpsmatrix
end{pspicture}
end{document}
How to draw Picture 1 like as Picture 2?(I see, 2 is more beautiful than 1)
How to compact ncline
or we can only typing manually? It means is there a macro like as ncline{->}{3}{2}{->}{4}{3}{->}{4}{5}...
?
Picture 1:
Picture 2:
The code of Picture 2 ( use tikz )
documentclass[tikz,border=3mm]{standalone}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
[every node/.style={circle,draw=red},
every path/.style={blue,-latex,thick}]
defa{2}
node (5) at (0,0) {$5$};
node (1) at (-a,-a) {$1$};
node (2) at (-a,a) {$2$};
node (3) at (a,a) {$3$};
node (4) at (a,-a) {$4$};
draw (1)--(4); draw (4)--(3);
draw (3)--(2); draw (5)--(3);
draw (5)--(1); draw (4)--(5);
draw (2) to[out=-70,in=70] (1);
draw (1) to[out=110,in=-110] (2);
draw (3) .. controls +(80:1) and +(30:1) .. (3); % <<<---- notice!
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
pstricks pst-node psmatrix
2
Please improve question title.
– albert
Nov 29 '18 at 12:02
:)))))))))))))))))))))))))))
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 12:10
I assume you mean here that picture 2 (though hard to see that it are 2 pictures as they are in the output very close to one another) is nicer, in your eyse, than picture 1. In what respect ? What is the difference in the generation of picture 1 and picture 2?
– albert
Nov 29 '18 at 12:23
I don't know the difference in the generation between them. :-)). I only hope anyone improve its macro "nccurve[angleA=80,angleB=25,ncurv=5]{->}{3}{3}". ;))
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 12:32
Can you change the title to reflect which problem you have? At the moment it won't help any future users who might have the same problem as you
– samcarter
Nov 29 '18 at 12:37
add a comment |
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
usepackage[utf8]{vietnam}
usepackage{pstricks,pst-node} % required package
usepackage{auto-pst-pdf}
begin{document}
begin{pspicture}
psmatrix[linecolor=red,mnode=Circle,radius=3mm,colsep=1.25cm,rowsep=1.25cm]
[name=2] 2 & & [name=3] 3 \
&[name=5] 5 \
[name=1] 1 & & [name=4] 4
psset{linecolor=blue,arrowscale=1.5}
ncline{->}{3}{2}
ncline{->}{4}{3}
ncline{->}{4}{5}
ncline{->}{5}{3}
ncline{->}{5}{1}
ncline{->}{1}{4}
nccurve[angleA=80,angleB=25,ncurv=5]{->}{3}{3}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{1}{2}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{2}{1}
endpsmatrix
end{pspicture}
end{document}
How to draw Picture 1 like as Picture 2?(I see, 2 is more beautiful than 1)
How to compact ncline
or we can only typing manually? It means is there a macro like as ncline{->}{3}{2}{->}{4}{3}{->}{4}{5}...
?
Picture 1:
Picture 2:
The code of Picture 2 ( use tikz )
documentclass[tikz,border=3mm]{standalone}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
[every node/.style={circle,draw=red},
every path/.style={blue,-latex,thick}]
defa{2}
node (5) at (0,0) {$5$};
node (1) at (-a,-a) {$1$};
node (2) at (-a,a) {$2$};
node (3) at (a,a) {$3$};
node (4) at (a,-a) {$4$};
draw (1)--(4); draw (4)--(3);
draw (3)--(2); draw (5)--(3);
draw (5)--(1); draw (4)--(5);
draw (2) to[out=-70,in=70] (1);
draw (1) to[out=110,in=-110] (2);
draw (3) .. controls +(80:1) and +(30:1) .. (3); % <<<---- notice!
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
pstricks pst-node psmatrix
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
usepackage[utf8]{vietnam}
usepackage{pstricks,pst-node} % required package
usepackage{auto-pst-pdf}
begin{document}
begin{pspicture}
psmatrix[linecolor=red,mnode=Circle,radius=3mm,colsep=1.25cm,rowsep=1.25cm]
[name=2] 2 & & [name=3] 3 \
&[name=5] 5 \
[name=1] 1 & & [name=4] 4
psset{linecolor=blue,arrowscale=1.5}
ncline{->}{3}{2}
ncline{->}{4}{3}
ncline{->}{4}{5}
ncline{->}{5}{3}
ncline{->}{5}{1}
ncline{->}{1}{4}
nccurve[angleA=80,angleB=25,ncurv=5]{->}{3}{3}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{1}{2}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{2}{1}
endpsmatrix
end{pspicture}
end{document}
How to draw Picture 1 like as Picture 2?(I see, 2 is more beautiful than 1)
How to compact ncline
or we can only typing manually? It means is there a macro like as ncline{->}{3}{2}{->}{4}{3}{->}{4}{5}...
?
Picture 1:
Picture 2:
The code of Picture 2 ( use tikz )
documentclass[tikz,border=3mm]{standalone}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
[every node/.style={circle,draw=red},
every path/.style={blue,-latex,thick}]
defa{2}
node (5) at (0,0) {$5$};
node (1) at (-a,-a) {$1$};
node (2) at (-a,a) {$2$};
node (3) at (a,a) {$3$};
node (4) at (a,-a) {$4$};
draw (1)--(4); draw (4)--(3);
draw (3)--(2); draw (5)--(3);
draw (5)--(1); draw (4)--(5);
draw (2) to[out=-70,in=70] (1);
draw (1) to[out=110,in=-110] (2);
draw (3) .. controls +(80:1) and +(30:1) .. (3); % <<<---- notice!
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
pstricks pst-node psmatrix
pstricks pst-node psmatrix
edited Nov 29 '18 at 12:54
chishimotoji
asked Nov 29 '18 at 11:54
chishimotojichishimotoji
950318
950318
2
Please improve question title.
– albert
Nov 29 '18 at 12:02
:)))))))))))))))))))))))))))
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 12:10
I assume you mean here that picture 2 (though hard to see that it are 2 pictures as they are in the output very close to one another) is nicer, in your eyse, than picture 1. In what respect ? What is the difference in the generation of picture 1 and picture 2?
– albert
Nov 29 '18 at 12:23
I don't know the difference in the generation between them. :-)). I only hope anyone improve its macro "nccurve[angleA=80,angleB=25,ncurv=5]{->}{3}{3}". ;))
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 12:32
Can you change the title to reflect which problem you have? At the moment it won't help any future users who might have the same problem as you
– samcarter
Nov 29 '18 at 12:37
add a comment |
2
Please improve question title.
– albert
Nov 29 '18 at 12:02
:)))))))))))))))))))))))))))
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 12:10
I assume you mean here that picture 2 (though hard to see that it are 2 pictures as they are in the output very close to one another) is nicer, in your eyse, than picture 1. In what respect ? What is the difference in the generation of picture 1 and picture 2?
– albert
Nov 29 '18 at 12:23
I don't know the difference in the generation between them. :-)). I only hope anyone improve its macro "nccurve[angleA=80,angleB=25,ncurv=5]{->}{3}{3}". ;))
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 12:32
Can you change the title to reflect which problem you have? At the moment it won't help any future users who might have the same problem as you
– samcarter
Nov 29 '18 at 12:37
2
2
Please improve question title.
– albert
Nov 29 '18 at 12:02
Please improve question title.
– albert
Nov 29 '18 at 12:02
:)))))))))))))))))))))))))))
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 12:10
:)))))))))))))))))))))))))))
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 12:10
I assume you mean here that picture 2 (though hard to see that it are 2 pictures as they are in the output very close to one another) is nicer, in your eyse, than picture 1. In what respect ? What is the difference in the generation of picture 1 and picture 2?
– albert
Nov 29 '18 at 12:23
I assume you mean here that picture 2 (though hard to see that it are 2 pictures as they are in the output very close to one another) is nicer, in your eyse, than picture 1. In what respect ? What is the difference in the generation of picture 1 and picture 2?
– albert
Nov 29 '18 at 12:23
I don't know the difference in the generation between them. :-)). I only hope anyone improve its macro "nccurve[angleA=80,angleB=25,ncurv=5]{->}{3}{3}". ;))
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 12:32
I don't know the difference in the generation between them. :-)). I only hope anyone improve its macro "nccurve[angleA=80,angleB=25,ncurv=5]{->}{3}{3}". ;))
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 12:32
Can you change the title to reflect which problem you have? At the moment it won't help any future users who might have the same problem as you
– samcarter
Nov 29 '18 at 12:37
Can you change the title to reflect which problem you have? At the moment it won't help any future users who might have the same problem as you
– samcarter
Nov 29 '18 at 12:37
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
define your own macro and for the loop use symmetrical angles with respect to 45 degrees::
documentclass{article}
usepackage{pst-node} % required package
usepackage{auto-pst-pdf}
makeatletter
newcommandNCline[3]{ncline{#1}{#2}{#3}@ifnextcharbgroupNCline{}}
makeatother
begin{document}
psmatrix[linecolor=red,mnode=Circle,radius=3mm,colsep=1.25cm,rowsep=1.25cm]
[name=2] 2 & & [name=3] 3 \
&[name=5] 5 \
[name=1] 1 & & [name=4] 4
psset{linecolor=blue,arrowscale=1.5}
NCline{->}{3}{2}{->}{4}{3}{->}{4}{5}{->}{5}{3}{->}{5}{1}{->}{1}{4}
nccurve[angleA=75,angleB=15,ncurv=6]{->}{3}{3}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{1}{2}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{2}{1}
endpsmatrix
end{document}
What do you think about its the tikz code?. ( I see its code "shorter" but "complete" :-(( .The pstricks code is longer, more complex than or the reason my code is not enough short as it ). See my editted comment
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 13:14
sure, it has absolute coordinates for the nodes! Can also be done with PSTricks.
– Herbert
Nov 29 '18 at 13:18
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462368%2fa-problem-with-the-command-nccurve%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
define your own macro and for the loop use symmetrical angles with respect to 45 degrees::
documentclass{article}
usepackage{pst-node} % required package
usepackage{auto-pst-pdf}
makeatletter
newcommandNCline[3]{ncline{#1}{#2}{#3}@ifnextcharbgroupNCline{}}
makeatother
begin{document}
psmatrix[linecolor=red,mnode=Circle,radius=3mm,colsep=1.25cm,rowsep=1.25cm]
[name=2] 2 & & [name=3] 3 \
&[name=5] 5 \
[name=1] 1 & & [name=4] 4
psset{linecolor=blue,arrowscale=1.5}
NCline{->}{3}{2}{->}{4}{3}{->}{4}{5}{->}{5}{3}{->}{5}{1}{->}{1}{4}
nccurve[angleA=75,angleB=15,ncurv=6]{->}{3}{3}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{1}{2}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{2}{1}
endpsmatrix
end{document}
What do you think about its the tikz code?. ( I see its code "shorter" but "complete" :-(( .The pstricks code is longer, more complex than or the reason my code is not enough short as it ). See my editted comment
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 13:14
sure, it has absolute coordinates for the nodes! Can also be done with PSTricks.
– Herbert
Nov 29 '18 at 13:18
add a comment |
define your own macro and for the loop use symmetrical angles with respect to 45 degrees::
documentclass{article}
usepackage{pst-node} % required package
usepackage{auto-pst-pdf}
makeatletter
newcommandNCline[3]{ncline{#1}{#2}{#3}@ifnextcharbgroupNCline{}}
makeatother
begin{document}
psmatrix[linecolor=red,mnode=Circle,radius=3mm,colsep=1.25cm,rowsep=1.25cm]
[name=2] 2 & & [name=3] 3 \
&[name=5] 5 \
[name=1] 1 & & [name=4] 4
psset{linecolor=blue,arrowscale=1.5}
NCline{->}{3}{2}{->}{4}{3}{->}{4}{5}{->}{5}{3}{->}{5}{1}{->}{1}{4}
nccurve[angleA=75,angleB=15,ncurv=6]{->}{3}{3}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{1}{2}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{2}{1}
endpsmatrix
end{document}
What do you think about its the tikz code?. ( I see its code "shorter" but "complete" :-(( .The pstricks code is longer, more complex than or the reason my code is not enough short as it ). See my editted comment
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 13:14
sure, it has absolute coordinates for the nodes! Can also be done with PSTricks.
– Herbert
Nov 29 '18 at 13:18
add a comment |
define your own macro and for the loop use symmetrical angles with respect to 45 degrees::
documentclass{article}
usepackage{pst-node} % required package
usepackage{auto-pst-pdf}
makeatletter
newcommandNCline[3]{ncline{#1}{#2}{#3}@ifnextcharbgroupNCline{}}
makeatother
begin{document}
psmatrix[linecolor=red,mnode=Circle,radius=3mm,colsep=1.25cm,rowsep=1.25cm]
[name=2] 2 & & [name=3] 3 \
&[name=5] 5 \
[name=1] 1 & & [name=4] 4
psset{linecolor=blue,arrowscale=1.5}
NCline{->}{3}{2}{->}{4}{3}{->}{4}{5}{->}{5}{3}{->}{5}{1}{->}{1}{4}
nccurve[angleA=75,angleB=15,ncurv=6]{->}{3}{3}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{1}{2}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{2}{1}
endpsmatrix
end{document}
define your own macro and for the loop use symmetrical angles with respect to 45 degrees::
documentclass{article}
usepackage{pst-node} % required package
usepackage{auto-pst-pdf}
makeatletter
newcommandNCline[3]{ncline{#1}{#2}{#3}@ifnextcharbgroupNCline{}}
makeatother
begin{document}
psmatrix[linecolor=red,mnode=Circle,radius=3mm,colsep=1.25cm,rowsep=1.25cm]
[name=2] 2 & & [name=3] 3 \
&[name=5] 5 \
[name=1] 1 & & [name=4] 4
psset{linecolor=blue,arrowscale=1.5}
NCline{->}{3}{2}{->}{4}{3}{->}{4}{5}{->}{5}{3}{->}{5}{1}{->}{1}{4}
nccurve[angleA=75,angleB=15,ncurv=6]{->}{3}{3}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{1}{2}
ncarc[arcangle=22]{->}{2}{1}
endpsmatrix
end{document}
answered Nov 29 '18 at 12:55
HerbertHerbert
270k24408717
270k24408717
What do you think about its the tikz code?. ( I see its code "shorter" but "complete" :-(( .The pstricks code is longer, more complex than or the reason my code is not enough short as it ). See my editted comment
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 13:14
sure, it has absolute coordinates for the nodes! Can also be done with PSTricks.
– Herbert
Nov 29 '18 at 13:18
add a comment |
What do you think about its the tikz code?. ( I see its code "shorter" but "complete" :-(( .The pstricks code is longer, more complex than or the reason my code is not enough short as it ). See my editted comment
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 13:14
sure, it has absolute coordinates for the nodes! Can also be done with PSTricks.
– Herbert
Nov 29 '18 at 13:18
What do you think about its the tikz code?. ( I see its code "shorter" but "complete" :-(( .The pstricks code is longer, more complex than or the reason my code is not enough short as it ). See my editted comment
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 13:14
What do you think about its the tikz code?. ( I see its code "shorter" but "complete" :-(( .The pstricks code is longer, more complex than or the reason my code is not enough short as it ). See my editted comment
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 13:14
sure, it has absolute coordinates for the nodes! Can also be done with PSTricks.
– Herbert
Nov 29 '18 at 13:18
sure, it has absolute coordinates for the nodes! Can also be done with PSTricks.
– Herbert
Nov 29 '18 at 13:18
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462368%2fa-problem-with-the-command-nccurve%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Please improve question title.
– albert
Nov 29 '18 at 12:02
:)))))))))))))))))))))))))))
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 12:10
I assume you mean here that picture 2 (though hard to see that it are 2 pictures as they are in the output very close to one another) is nicer, in your eyse, than picture 1. In what respect ? What is the difference in the generation of picture 1 and picture 2?
– albert
Nov 29 '18 at 12:23
I don't know the difference in the generation between them. :-)). I only hope anyone improve its macro "nccurve[angleA=80,angleB=25,ncurv=5]{->}{3}{3}". ;))
– chishimotoji
Nov 29 '18 at 12:32
Can you change the title to reflect which problem you have? At the moment it won't help any future users who might have the same problem as you
– samcarter
Nov 29 '18 at 12:37