Complex Analysis. Showing absolute convergence of principal part of Laurent series for a holomorphic...












0












$begingroup$


I am given that $f: D(P, r) setminus { P } to mathbb{C}$ is holomorphic. I want to show that the principal part of the Laurent series expansion for $f$ converges absolutely on $mathbb{C} setminus {P}$. Confused on how to proceed.



I know that the convergence is absolute on $D(P, r) setminus { P }$. I don't see how to extend the principal part to $mathbb{C}setminus{P}$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I am given that $f: D(P, r) setminus { P } to mathbb{C}$ is holomorphic. I want to show that the principal part of the Laurent series expansion for $f$ converges absolutely on $mathbb{C} setminus {P}$. Confused on how to proceed.



    I know that the convergence is absolute on $D(P, r) setminus { P }$. I don't see how to extend the principal part to $mathbb{C}setminus{P}$.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I am given that $f: D(P, r) setminus { P } to mathbb{C}$ is holomorphic. I want to show that the principal part of the Laurent series expansion for $f$ converges absolutely on $mathbb{C} setminus {P}$. Confused on how to proceed.



      I know that the convergence is absolute on $D(P, r) setminus { P }$. I don't see how to extend the principal part to $mathbb{C}setminus{P}$.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I am given that $f: D(P, r) setminus { P } to mathbb{C}$ is holomorphic. I want to show that the principal part of the Laurent series expansion for $f$ converges absolutely on $mathbb{C} setminus {P}$. Confused on how to proceed.



      I know that the convergence is absolute on $D(P, r) setminus { P }$. I don't see how to extend the principal part to $mathbb{C}setminus{P}$.







      sequences-and-series complex-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 7 '18 at 0:29







      user623740





























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          The principal part gets better as you get farther from the pole, since it has only negative powers of $(z - P)$. Apply a comparison test, using the fact that the series is convergent at some point $z ne P$.



          In particular, you can use the fact that



          $$left|frac{a_n}{(z - P)^n}right| le frac{|a_n|}{r^n}$$



          for $z notin mathbb{D}(P, r)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you. I will try this out.
            $endgroup$
            – user623740
            Dec 7 '18 at 0:36










          • $begingroup$
            So basically take the limit of the right-hand side as $r to infty$?
            $endgroup$
            – user623740
            Dec 7 '18 at 1:33










          • $begingroup$
            No, because $r$ is just some fixed number.
            $endgroup$
            – T. Bongers
            Dec 7 '18 at 1:34











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029279%2fcomplex-analysis-showing-absolute-convergence-of-principal-part-of-laurent-seri%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          The principal part gets better as you get farther from the pole, since it has only negative powers of $(z - P)$. Apply a comparison test, using the fact that the series is convergent at some point $z ne P$.



          In particular, you can use the fact that



          $$left|frac{a_n}{(z - P)^n}right| le frac{|a_n|}{r^n}$$



          for $z notin mathbb{D}(P, r)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you. I will try this out.
            $endgroup$
            – user623740
            Dec 7 '18 at 0:36










          • $begingroup$
            So basically take the limit of the right-hand side as $r to infty$?
            $endgroup$
            – user623740
            Dec 7 '18 at 1:33










          • $begingroup$
            No, because $r$ is just some fixed number.
            $endgroup$
            – T. Bongers
            Dec 7 '18 at 1:34
















          0












          $begingroup$

          The principal part gets better as you get farther from the pole, since it has only negative powers of $(z - P)$. Apply a comparison test, using the fact that the series is convergent at some point $z ne P$.



          In particular, you can use the fact that



          $$left|frac{a_n}{(z - P)^n}right| le frac{|a_n|}{r^n}$$



          for $z notin mathbb{D}(P, r)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you. I will try this out.
            $endgroup$
            – user623740
            Dec 7 '18 at 0:36










          • $begingroup$
            So basically take the limit of the right-hand side as $r to infty$?
            $endgroup$
            – user623740
            Dec 7 '18 at 1:33










          • $begingroup$
            No, because $r$ is just some fixed number.
            $endgroup$
            – T. Bongers
            Dec 7 '18 at 1:34














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          The principal part gets better as you get farther from the pole, since it has only negative powers of $(z - P)$. Apply a comparison test, using the fact that the series is convergent at some point $z ne P$.



          In particular, you can use the fact that



          $$left|frac{a_n}{(z - P)^n}right| le frac{|a_n|}{r^n}$$



          for $z notin mathbb{D}(P, r)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The principal part gets better as you get farther from the pole, since it has only negative powers of $(z - P)$. Apply a comparison test, using the fact that the series is convergent at some point $z ne P$.



          In particular, you can use the fact that



          $$left|frac{a_n}{(z - P)^n}right| le frac{|a_n|}{r^n}$$



          for $z notin mathbb{D}(P, r)$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 7 '18 at 0:34









          T. BongersT. Bongers

          23.1k54662




          23.1k54662












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you. I will try this out.
            $endgroup$
            – user623740
            Dec 7 '18 at 0:36










          • $begingroup$
            So basically take the limit of the right-hand side as $r to infty$?
            $endgroup$
            – user623740
            Dec 7 '18 at 1:33










          • $begingroup$
            No, because $r$ is just some fixed number.
            $endgroup$
            – T. Bongers
            Dec 7 '18 at 1:34


















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you. I will try this out.
            $endgroup$
            – user623740
            Dec 7 '18 at 0:36










          • $begingroup$
            So basically take the limit of the right-hand side as $r to infty$?
            $endgroup$
            – user623740
            Dec 7 '18 at 1:33










          • $begingroup$
            No, because $r$ is just some fixed number.
            $endgroup$
            – T. Bongers
            Dec 7 '18 at 1:34
















          $begingroup$
          Thank you. I will try this out.
          $endgroup$
          – user623740
          Dec 7 '18 at 0:36




          $begingroup$
          Thank you. I will try this out.
          $endgroup$
          – user623740
          Dec 7 '18 at 0:36












          $begingroup$
          So basically take the limit of the right-hand side as $r to infty$?
          $endgroup$
          – user623740
          Dec 7 '18 at 1:33




          $begingroup$
          So basically take the limit of the right-hand side as $r to infty$?
          $endgroup$
          – user623740
          Dec 7 '18 at 1:33












          $begingroup$
          No, because $r$ is just some fixed number.
          $endgroup$
          – T. Bongers
          Dec 7 '18 at 1:34




          $begingroup$
          No, because $r$ is just some fixed number.
          $endgroup$
          – T. Bongers
          Dec 7 '18 at 1:34


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029279%2fcomplex-analysis-showing-absolute-convergence-of-principal-part-of-laurent-seri%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Verónica Boquete

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten