Complex Analysis. Showing absolute convergence of principal part of Laurent series for a holomorphic...
$begingroup$
I am given that $f: D(P, r) setminus { P } to mathbb{C}$ is holomorphic. I want to show that the principal part of the Laurent series expansion for $f$ converges absolutely on $mathbb{C} setminus {P}$. Confused on how to proceed.
I know that the convergence is absolute on $D(P, r) setminus { P }$. I don't see how to extend the principal part to $mathbb{C}setminus{P}$.
sequences-and-series complex-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am given that $f: D(P, r) setminus { P } to mathbb{C}$ is holomorphic. I want to show that the principal part of the Laurent series expansion for $f$ converges absolutely on $mathbb{C} setminus {P}$. Confused on how to proceed.
I know that the convergence is absolute on $D(P, r) setminus { P }$. I don't see how to extend the principal part to $mathbb{C}setminus{P}$.
sequences-and-series complex-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am given that $f: D(P, r) setminus { P } to mathbb{C}$ is holomorphic. I want to show that the principal part of the Laurent series expansion for $f$ converges absolutely on $mathbb{C} setminus {P}$. Confused on how to proceed.
I know that the convergence is absolute on $D(P, r) setminus { P }$. I don't see how to extend the principal part to $mathbb{C}setminus{P}$.
sequences-and-series complex-analysis
$endgroup$
I am given that $f: D(P, r) setminus { P } to mathbb{C}$ is holomorphic. I want to show that the principal part of the Laurent series expansion for $f$ converges absolutely on $mathbb{C} setminus {P}$. Confused on how to proceed.
I know that the convergence is absolute on $D(P, r) setminus { P }$. I don't see how to extend the principal part to $mathbb{C}setminus{P}$.
sequences-and-series complex-analysis
sequences-and-series complex-analysis
asked Dec 7 '18 at 0:29
user623740
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The principal part gets better as you get farther from the pole, since it has only negative powers of $(z - P)$. Apply a comparison test, using the fact that the series is convergent at some point $z ne P$.
In particular, you can use the fact that
$$left|frac{a_n}{(z - P)^n}right| le frac{|a_n|}{r^n}$$
for $z notin mathbb{D}(P, r)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. I will try this out.
$endgroup$
– user623740
Dec 7 '18 at 0:36
$begingroup$
So basically take the limit of the right-hand side as $r to infty$?
$endgroup$
– user623740
Dec 7 '18 at 1:33
$begingroup$
No, because $r$ is just some fixed number.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 7 '18 at 1:34
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029279%2fcomplex-analysis-showing-absolute-convergence-of-principal-part-of-laurent-seri%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The principal part gets better as you get farther from the pole, since it has only negative powers of $(z - P)$. Apply a comparison test, using the fact that the series is convergent at some point $z ne P$.
In particular, you can use the fact that
$$left|frac{a_n}{(z - P)^n}right| le frac{|a_n|}{r^n}$$
for $z notin mathbb{D}(P, r)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. I will try this out.
$endgroup$
– user623740
Dec 7 '18 at 0:36
$begingroup$
So basically take the limit of the right-hand side as $r to infty$?
$endgroup$
– user623740
Dec 7 '18 at 1:33
$begingroup$
No, because $r$ is just some fixed number.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 7 '18 at 1:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The principal part gets better as you get farther from the pole, since it has only negative powers of $(z - P)$. Apply a comparison test, using the fact that the series is convergent at some point $z ne P$.
In particular, you can use the fact that
$$left|frac{a_n}{(z - P)^n}right| le frac{|a_n|}{r^n}$$
for $z notin mathbb{D}(P, r)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. I will try this out.
$endgroup$
– user623740
Dec 7 '18 at 0:36
$begingroup$
So basically take the limit of the right-hand side as $r to infty$?
$endgroup$
– user623740
Dec 7 '18 at 1:33
$begingroup$
No, because $r$ is just some fixed number.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 7 '18 at 1:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The principal part gets better as you get farther from the pole, since it has only negative powers of $(z - P)$. Apply a comparison test, using the fact that the series is convergent at some point $z ne P$.
In particular, you can use the fact that
$$left|frac{a_n}{(z - P)^n}right| le frac{|a_n|}{r^n}$$
for $z notin mathbb{D}(P, r)$.
$endgroup$
The principal part gets better as you get farther from the pole, since it has only negative powers of $(z - P)$. Apply a comparison test, using the fact that the series is convergent at some point $z ne P$.
In particular, you can use the fact that
$$left|frac{a_n}{(z - P)^n}right| le frac{|a_n|}{r^n}$$
for $z notin mathbb{D}(P, r)$.
answered Dec 7 '18 at 0:34
T. BongersT. Bongers
23.1k54662
23.1k54662
$begingroup$
Thank you. I will try this out.
$endgroup$
– user623740
Dec 7 '18 at 0:36
$begingroup$
So basically take the limit of the right-hand side as $r to infty$?
$endgroup$
– user623740
Dec 7 '18 at 1:33
$begingroup$
No, because $r$ is just some fixed number.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 7 '18 at 1:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you. I will try this out.
$endgroup$
– user623740
Dec 7 '18 at 0:36
$begingroup$
So basically take the limit of the right-hand side as $r to infty$?
$endgroup$
– user623740
Dec 7 '18 at 1:33
$begingroup$
No, because $r$ is just some fixed number.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 7 '18 at 1:34
$begingroup$
Thank you. I will try this out.
$endgroup$
– user623740
Dec 7 '18 at 0:36
$begingroup$
Thank you. I will try this out.
$endgroup$
– user623740
Dec 7 '18 at 0:36
$begingroup$
So basically take the limit of the right-hand side as $r to infty$?
$endgroup$
– user623740
Dec 7 '18 at 1:33
$begingroup$
So basically take the limit of the right-hand side as $r to infty$?
$endgroup$
– user623740
Dec 7 '18 at 1:33
$begingroup$
No, because $r$ is just some fixed number.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 7 '18 at 1:34
$begingroup$
No, because $r$ is just some fixed number.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 7 '18 at 1:34
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029279%2fcomplex-analysis-showing-absolute-convergence-of-principal-part-of-laurent-seri%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown