When should you multiply probabilities?












1












$begingroup$



In an entrance test that is graded on the basis of two examinations,
the probability of a randomly chosen student passing the first
examination is 0.8 and the probability of passing the second
examination is 0.7. The probability of passing atleast one of them is
0.95. What is the probability of passing both?




If the probability of passing the first examination is .8 and the probability of passing the second is 0.7, why can't I multiply the two probabilities to get the probability that someone would pass both the examinations? My textbooks gives the answer as .55, which is different from what you'd get if you multiplied the probabilities (.56).



I understand how my textbook arrives at .55 (you use $ P(A cup B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A cap B) $), but I want to understand why I can't simply multiply the probabilities. The two answers are also very close to each other (.55 vs .56).










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Because they are not independent. This is the simple answer. If they are independent then $P[Acap B] = P[A]P[B]$. Otherwise, you use th formula you mentioned.
    $endgroup$
    – BlackMath
    Dec 6 '18 at 23:54
















1












$begingroup$



In an entrance test that is graded on the basis of two examinations,
the probability of a randomly chosen student passing the first
examination is 0.8 and the probability of passing the second
examination is 0.7. The probability of passing atleast one of them is
0.95. What is the probability of passing both?




If the probability of passing the first examination is .8 and the probability of passing the second is 0.7, why can't I multiply the two probabilities to get the probability that someone would pass both the examinations? My textbooks gives the answer as .55, which is different from what you'd get if you multiplied the probabilities (.56).



I understand how my textbook arrives at .55 (you use $ P(A cup B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A cap B) $), but I want to understand why I can't simply multiply the probabilities. The two answers are also very close to each other (.55 vs .56).










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Because they are not independent. This is the simple answer. If they are independent then $P[Acap B] = P[A]P[B]$. Otherwise, you use th formula you mentioned.
    $endgroup$
    – BlackMath
    Dec 6 '18 at 23:54














1












1








1





$begingroup$



In an entrance test that is graded on the basis of two examinations,
the probability of a randomly chosen student passing the first
examination is 0.8 and the probability of passing the second
examination is 0.7. The probability of passing atleast one of them is
0.95. What is the probability of passing both?




If the probability of passing the first examination is .8 and the probability of passing the second is 0.7, why can't I multiply the two probabilities to get the probability that someone would pass both the examinations? My textbooks gives the answer as .55, which is different from what you'd get if you multiplied the probabilities (.56).



I understand how my textbook arrives at .55 (you use $ P(A cup B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A cap B) $), but I want to understand why I can't simply multiply the probabilities. The two answers are also very close to each other (.55 vs .56).










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





In an entrance test that is graded on the basis of two examinations,
the probability of a randomly chosen student passing the first
examination is 0.8 and the probability of passing the second
examination is 0.7. The probability of passing atleast one of them is
0.95. What is the probability of passing both?




If the probability of passing the first examination is .8 and the probability of passing the second is 0.7, why can't I multiply the two probabilities to get the probability that someone would pass both the examinations? My textbooks gives the answer as .55, which is different from what you'd get if you multiplied the probabilities (.56).



I understand how my textbook arrives at .55 (you use $ P(A cup B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A cap B) $), but I want to understand why I can't simply multiply the probabilities. The two answers are also very close to each other (.55 vs .56).







probability






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 6 '18 at 23:50







WorldGov

















asked Dec 6 '18 at 23:33









WorldGovWorldGov

305111




305111












  • $begingroup$
    Because they are not independent. This is the simple answer. If they are independent then $P[Acap B] = P[A]P[B]$. Otherwise, you use th formula you mentioned.
    $endgroup$
    – BlackMath
    Dec 6 '18 at 23:54


















  • $begingroup$
    Because they are not independent. This is the simple answer. If they are independent then $P[Acap B] = P[A]P[B]$. Otherwise, you use th formula you mentioned.
    $endgroup$
    – BlackMath
    Dec 6 '18 at 23:54
















$begingroup$
Because they are not independent. This is the simple answer. If they are independent then $P[Acap B] = P[A]P[B]$. Otherwise, you use th formula you mentioned.
$endgroup$
– BlackMath
Dec 6 '18 at 23:54




$begingroup$
Because they are not independent. This is the simple answer. If they are independent then $P[Acap B] = P[A]P[B]$. Otherwise, you use th formula you mentioned.
$endgroup$
– BlackMath
Dec 6 '18 at 23:54










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

You can only multiply probabilities if the two events are INDEPENDENT of each other. In other words, the result of one thing being true has no effect on the other one.



In this case, someone passing a test means they are likely a better student, and thus likelier to pass the second test.



Let's say 9 out of 10 students passed test 1, and 8 out of ten students passed test 2. In particular, in this case, lets say that 8 out of 8 students passed both tests. So we have one student who passed just the first test, and one student who failed both.



So if you tried to get the probability that a random student failed both tests, in this case, it's clearly 1 out of 10. If you tried by multiplication, you would get $.2$ times $.1$, which is $.02$, or 1 out of 50.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    The reason is that both events (passing the first exam and passing the second exam) are not independent. Only then is the rule of multiplying the individual probabilities correct.



    It seems that the values for this problem were chosen such that the events are only slightly correlated (that means their dependence one another is not very big), such that the incorrect product formula gives an almost correct result. But that is just due to the values of the probabilities, it might be much different in another context with more differing result.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029219%2fwhen-should-you-multiply-probabilities%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      You can only multiply probabilities if the two events are INDEPENDENT of each other. In other words, the result of one thing being true has no effect on the other one.



      In this case, someone passing a test means they are likely a better student, and thus likelier to pass the second test.



      Let's say 9 out of 10 students passed test 1, and 8 out of ten students passed test 2. In particular, in this case, lets say that 8 out of 8 students passed both tests. So we have one student who passed just the first test, and one student who failed both.



      So if you tried to get the probability that a random student failed both tests, in this case, it's clearly 1 out of 10. If you tried by multiplication, you would get $.2$ times $.1$, which is $.02$, or 1 out of 50.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        3












        $begingroup$

        You can only multiply probabilities if the two events are INDEPENDENT of each other. In other words, the result of one thing being true has no effect on the other one.



        In this case, someone passing a test means they are likely a better student, and thus likelier to pass the second test.



        Let's say 9 out of 10 students passed test 1, and 8 out of ten students passed test 2. In particular, in this case, lets say that 8 out of 8 students passed both tests. So we have one student who passed just the first test, and one student who failed both.



        So if you tried to get the probability that a random student failed both tests, in this case, it's clearly 1 out of 10. If you tried by multiplication, you would get $.2$ times $.1$, which is $.02$, or 1 out of 50.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          You can only multiply probabilities if the two events are INDEPENDENT of each other. In other words, the result of one thing being true has no effect on the other one.



          In this case, someone passing a test means they are likely a better student, and thus likelier to pass the second test.



          Let's say 9 out of 10 students passed test 1, and 8 out of ten students passed test 2. In particular, in this case, lets say that 8 out of 8 students passed both tests. So we have one student who passed just the first test, and one student who failed both.



          So if you tried to get the probability that a random student failed both tests, in this case, it's clearly 1 out of 10. If you tried by multiplication, you would get $.2$ times $.1$, which is $.02$, or 1 out of 50.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          You can only multiply probabilities if the two events are INDEPENDENT of each other. In other words, the result of one thing being true has no effect on the other one.



          In this case, someone passing a test means they are likely a better student, and thus likelier to pass the second test.



          Let's say 9 out of 10 students passed test 1, and 8 out of ten students passed test 2. In particular, in this case, lets say that 8 out of 8 students passed both tests. So we have one student who passed just the first test, and one student who failed both.



          So if you tried to get the probability that a random student failed both tests, in this case, it's clearly 1 out of 10. If you tried by multiplication, you would get $.2$ times $.1$, which is $.02$, or 1 out of 50.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 6 '18 at 23:43









          AlanAlan

          8,59221636




          8,59221636























              0












              $begingroup$

              The reason is that both events (passing the first exam and passing the second exam) are not independent. Only then is the rule of multiplying the individual probabilities correct.



              It seems that the values for this problem were chosen such that the events are only slightly correlated (that means their dependence one another is not very big), such that the incorrect product formula gives an almost correct result. But that is just due to the values of the probabilities, it might be much different in another context with more differing result.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                The reason is that both events (passing the first exam and passing the second exam) are not independent. Only then is the rule of multiplying the individual probabilities correct.



                It seems that the values for this problem were chosen such that the events are only slightly correlated (that means their dependence one another is not very big), such that the incorrect product formula gives an almost correct result. But that is just due to the values of the probabilities, it might be much different in another context with more differing result.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  The reason is that both events (passing the first exam and passing the second exam) are not independent. Only then is the rule of multiplying the individual probabilities correct.



                  It seems that the values for this problem were chosen such that the events are only slightly correlated (that means their dependence one another is not very big), such that the incorrect product formula gives an almost correct result. But that is just due to the values of the probabilities, it might be much different in another context with more differing result.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  The reason is that both events (passing the first exam and passing the second exam) are not independent. Only then is the rule of multiplying the individual probabilities correct.



                  It seems that the values for this problem were chosen such that the events are only slightly correlated (that means their dependence one another is not very big), such that the incorrect product formula gives an almost correct result. But that is just due to the values of the probabilities, it might be much different in another context with more differing result.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 6 '18 at 23:44









                  IngixIngix

                  3,784146




                  3,784146






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029219%2fwhen-should-you-multiply-probabilities%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bundesstraße 106

                      Verónica Boquete

                      Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten