Find the covariance of two jointly distributed RV's when you don't know the joint pmf












-1












$begingroup$


I have two correlated random variables, X and Y, and I am trying to find their covariance. I know: their individual expected values $langle X rangle$ and $langle Y rangle$ and their individual variances $sigma^2_X$ and $sigma^2_Y$. If the covariance is given as
$cov(X,Y) = langle XY rangle -langle X rangle langle Y rangle$,
then I already know the second term but I have no idea how to compute the first term. I don't know the joint pmf. Do I need the joint pmf to calculate $langle XY rangle$?






probability probability-theory covariance







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    -1












    $begingroup$


    I have two correlated random variables, X and Y, and I am trying to find their covariance. I know: their individual expected values $langle X rangle$ and $langle Y rangle$ and their individual variances $sigma^2_X$ and $sigma^2_Y$. If the covariance is given as
    $cov(X,Y) = langle XY rangle -langle X rangle langle Y rangle$,
    then I already know the second term but I have no idea how to compute the first term. I don't know the joint pmf. Do I need the joint pmf to calculate $langle XY rangle$?






    probability probability-theory covariance







    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      -1












      -1








      -1





      $begingroup$


      I have two correlated random variables, X and Y, and I am trying to find their covariance. I know: their individual expected values $langle X rangle$ and $langle Y rangle$ and their individual variances $sigma^2_X$ and $sigma^2_Y$. If the covariance is given as
      $cov(X,Y) = langle XY rangle -langle X rangle langle Y rangle$,
      then I already know the second term but I have no idea how to compute the first term. I don't know the joint pmf. Do I need the joint pmf to calculate $langle XY rangle$?






      probability probability-theory covariance







      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I have two correlated random variables, X and Y, and I am trying to find their covariance. I know: their individual expected values $langle X rangle$ and $langle Y rangle$ and their individual variances $sigma^2_X$ and $sigma^2_Y$. If the covariance is given as
      $cov(X,Y) = langle XY rangle -langle X rangle langle Y rangle$,
      then I already know the second term but I have no idea how to compute the first term. I don't know the joint pmf. Do I need the joint pmf to calculate $langle XY rangle$?






      probability probability-theory covariance




      probability probability-theory covariance






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 18 '18 at 2:12









      SabrinaChoiceSabrinaChoice

      246




      246






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Consider two normal random variables $X$ and $Y$ each having mean zero and unit variance.
          If they are independent, then their covariance is $$mathbb{E}[XY]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=0.$$
          However, if $X=Y$ (i.e., the two variables are perfectly correlated), then $$mathbb{E}[XY]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=mathbb{E}[X^{2}]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=1.$$



          What does this suggest?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            This suggests that $mathbb{E}[X^2]$=1, but I can't see much beyond that, sorry!
            $endgroup$
            – SabrinaChoice
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:21








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            But what does it suggest about the covariance? Is it uniquely determined by mean and variance?
            $endgroup$
            – parsiad
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:30










          • $begingroup$
            I'm not sure because the bottom expression you wrote is the expression for the variance. So it states that the variance is equal to the variance. I'm not seeing how it can add any other constraint.
            $endgroup$
            – SabrinaChoice
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:34






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            I was trying to get you to come to the conclusion that you have insufficient information to determine the covariance.
            $endgroup$
            – parsiad
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:37








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Put differently: the marginals do not characterize the joint distribution. Because $p_Xtimes p_Y$ has, by definition, the same marginals as $p_{XY}$.
            $endgroup$
            – Clement C.
            Dec 18 '18 at 3:08













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044705%2ffind-the-covariance-of-two-jointly-distributed-rvs-when-you-dont-know-the-join%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          Consider two normal random variables $X$ and $Y$ each having mean zero and unit variance.
          If they are independent, then their covariance is $$mathbb{E}[XY]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=0.$$
          However, if $X=Y$ (i.e., the two variables are perfectly correlated), then $$mathbb{E}[XY]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=mathbb{E}[X^{2}]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=1.$$



          What does this suggest?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            This suggests that $mathbb{E}[X^2]$=1, but I can't see much beyond that, sorry!
            $endgroup$
            – SabrinaChoice
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:21








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            But what does it suggest about the covariance? Is it uniquely determined by mean and variance?
            $endgroup$
            – parsiad
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:30










          • $begingroup$
            I'm not sure because the bottom expression you wrote is the expression for the variance. So it states that the variance is equal to the variance. I'm not seeing how it can add any other constraint.
            $endgroup$
            – SabrinaChoice
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:34






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            I was trying to get you to come to the conclusion that you have insufficient information to determine the covariance.
            $endgroup$
            – parsiad
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:37








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Put differently: the marginals do not characterize the joint distribution. Because $p_Xtimes p_Y$ has, by definition, the same marginals as $p_{XY}$.
            $endgroup$
            – Clement C.
            Dec 18 '18 at 3:08


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Consider two normal random variables $X$ and $Y$ each having mean zero and unit variance.
          If they are independent, then their covariance is $$mathbb{E}[XY]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=0.$$
          However, if $X=Y$ (i.e., the two variables are perfectly correlated), then $$mathbb{E}[XY]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=mathbb{E}[X^{2}]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=1.$$



          What does this suggest?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            This suggests that $mathbb{E}[X^2]$=1, but I can't see much beyond that, sorry!
            $endgroup$
            – SabrinaChoice
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:21








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            But what does it suggest about the covariance? Is it uniquely determined by mean and variance?
            $endgroup$
            – parsiad
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:30










          • $begingroup$
            I'm not sure because the bottom expression you wrote is the expression for the variance. So it states that the variance is equal to the variance. I'm not seeing how it can add any other constraint.
            $endgroup$
            – SabrinaChoice
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:34






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            I was trying to get you to come to the conclusion that you have insufficient information to determine the covariance.
            $endgroup$
            – parsiad
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:37








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Put differently: the marginals do not characterize the joint distribution. Because $p_Xtimes p_Y$ has, by definition, the same marginals as $p_{XY}$.
            $endgroup$
            – Clement C.
            Dec 18 '18 at 3:08
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Consider two normal random variables $X$ and $Y$ each having mean zero and unit variance.
          If they are independent, then their covariance is $$mathbb{E}[XY]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=0.$$
          However, if $X=Y$ (i.e., the two variables are perfectly correlated), then $$mathbb{E}[XY]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=mathbb{E}[X^{2}]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=1.$$



          What does this suggest?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Consider two normal random variables $X$ and $Y$ each having mean zero and unit variance.
          If they are independent, then their covariance is $$mathbb{E}[XY]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=0.$$
          However, if $X=Y$ (i.e., the two variables are perfectly correlated), then $$mathbb{E}[XY]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=mathbb{E}[X^{2}]-mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y]=1.$$



          What does this suggest?







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 18 '18 at 2:17









          parsiadparsiad

          18.3k32453




          18.3k32453












          • $begingroup$
            This suggests that $mathbb{E}[X^2]$=1, but I can't see much beyond that, sorry!
            $endgroup$
            – SabrinaChoice
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:21








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            But what does it suggest about the covariance? Is it uniquely determined by mean and variance?
            $endgroup$
            – parsiad
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:30










          • $begingroup$
            I'm not sure because the bottom expression you wrote is the expression for the variance. So it states that the variance is equal to the variance. I'm not seeing how it can add any other constraint.
            $endgroup$
            – SabrinaChoice
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:34






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            I was trying to get you to come to the conclusion that you have insufficient information to determine the covariance.
            $endgroup$
            – parsiad
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:37








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Put differently: the marginals do not characterize the joint distribution. Because $p_Xtimes p_Y$ has, by definition, the same marginals as $p_{XY}$.
            $endgroup$
            – Clement C.
            Dec 18 '18 at 3:08




















          • $begingroup$
            This suggests that $mathbb{E}[X^2]$=1, but I can't see much beyond that, sorry!
            $endgroup$
            – SabrinaChoice
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:21








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            But what does it suggest about the covariance? Is it uniquely determined by mean and variance?
            $endgroup$
            – parsiad
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:30










          • $begingroup$
            I'm not sure because the bottom expression you wrote is the expression for the variance. So it states that the variance is equal to the variance. I'm not seeing how it can add any other constraint.
            $endgroup$
            – SabrinaChoice
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:34






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            I was trying to get you to come to the conclusion that you have insufficient information to determine the covariance.
            $endgroup$
            – parsiad
            Dec 18 '18 at 2:37








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Put differently: the marginals do not characterize the joint distribution. Because $p_Xtimes p_Y$ has, by definition, the same marginals as $p_{XY}$.
            $endgroup$
            – Clement C.
            Dec 18 '18 at 3:08


















          $begingroup$
          This suggests that $mathbb{E}[X^2]$=1, but I can't see much beyond that, sorry!
          $endgroup$
          – SabrinaChoice
          Dec 18 '18 at 2:21






          $begingroup$
          This suggests that $mathbb{E}[X^2]$=1, but I can't see much beyond that, sorry!
          $endgroup$
          – SabrinaChoice
          Dec 18 '18 at 2:21






          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          But what does it suggest about the covariance? Is it uniquely determined by mean and variance?
          $endgroup$
          – parsiad
          Dec 18 '18 at 2:30




          $begingroup$
          But what does it suggest about the covariance? Is it uniquely determined by mean and variance?
          $endgroup$
          – parsiad
          Dec 18 '18 at 2:30












          $begingroup$
          I'm not sure because the bottom expression you wrote is the expression for the variance. So it states that the variance is equal to the variance. I'm not seeing how it can add any other constraint.
          $endgroup$
          – SabrinaChoice
          Dec 18 '18 at 2:34




          $begingroup$
          I'm not sure because the bottom expression you wrote is the expression for the variance. So it states that the variance is equal to the variance. I'm not seeing how it can add any other constraint.
          $endgroup$
          – SabrinaChoice
          Dec 18 '18 at 2:34




          4




          4




          $begingroup$
          I was trying to get you to come to the conclusion that you have insufficient information to determine the covariance.
          $endgroup$
          – parsiad
          Dec 18 '18 at 2:37






          $begingroup$
          I was trying to get you to come to the conclusion that you have insufficient information to determine the covariance.
          $endgroup$
          – parsiad
          Dec 18 '18 at 2:37






          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Put differently: the marginals do not characterize the joint distribution. Because $p_Xtimes p_Y$ has, by definition, the same marginals as $p_{XY}$.
          $endgroup$
          – Clement C.
          Dec 18 '18 at 3:08






          $begingroup$
          Put differently: the marginals do not characterize the joint distribution. Because $p_Xtimes p_Y$ has, by definition, the same marginals as $p_{XY}$.
          $endgroup$
          – Clement C.
          Dec 18 '18 at 3:08




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044705%2ffind-the-covariance-of-two-jointly-distributed-rvs-when-you-dont-know-the-join%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Image
          Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
          Read more

          Verónica Boquete

          Image
          Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
          Read more

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

          Image
          Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
          Read more