What manifold is produced if all similar triangles in the plane are identified?











up vote
8
down vote

favorite
4












Consider Euclidean space $mathbb{R}^6$, we can consider this as the $x$ and $y$ coordinates of the $3$ points of a triangle in $mathbb{R}^2$. If we identify all points in $mathbb{R}^6$ whose triangles have the same 3 angles, what manifold do we get under the quotient topology?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What have you tried? Also please use mathjax to format your posts. There is a tutorial here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5020/90543
    – jgon
    Nov 16 at 12:05










  • Im not well versed in topology to solve this however I am curious if this has been studied and what the answer is and how to solve it.
    – KALLE DA BAWS
    Nov 16 at 12:15








  • 1




    Interesting. It's not clear that the result is a manifold though. The first step would be to find a fundamental domain in $mathbb{R}^6$.
    – Najib Idrissi
    Nov 16 at 13:40






  • 2




    It really should be regarded as an orbifold, since it has special points with more symmetry like the equilateral triangle. Try looking up "moduli space of triangles," e.g. ms.u-tokyo.ac.jp/journal/pdf/jms100108.pdf or jstor.org/stable/10.4169/….
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 16 at 22:32

















up vote
8
down vote

favorite
4












Consider Euclidean space $mathbb{R}^6$, we can consider this as the $x$ and $y$ coordinates of the $3$ points of a triangle in $mathbb{R}^2$. If we identify all points in $mathbb{R}^6$ whose triangles have the same 3 angles, what manifold do we get under the quotient topology?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What have you tried? Also please use mathjax to format your posts. There is a tutorial here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5020/90543
    – jgon
    Nov 16 at 12:05










  • Im not well versed in topology to solve this however I am curious if this has been studied and what the answer is and how to solve it.
    – KALLE DA BAWS
    Nov 16 at 12:15








  • 1




    Interesting. It's not clear that the result is a manifold though. The first step would be to find a fundamental domain in $mathbb{R}^6$.
    – Najib Idrissi
    Nov 16 at 13:40






  • 2




    It really should be regarded as an orbifold, since it has special points with more symmetry like the equilateral triangle. Try looking up "moduli space of triangles," e.g. ms.u-tokyo.ac.jp/journal/pdf/jms100108.pdf or jstor.org/stable/10.4169/….
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 16 at 22:32















up vote
8
down vote

favorite
4









up vote
8
down vote

favorite
4






4





Consider Euclidean space $mathbb{R}^6$, we can consider this as the $x$ and $y$ coordinates of the $3$ points of a triangle in $mathbb{R}^2$. If we identify all points in $mathbb{R}^6$ whose triangles have the same 3 angles, what manifold do we get under the quotient topology?










share|cite|improve this question















Consider Euclidean space $mathbb{R}^6$, we can consider this as the $x$ and $y$ coordinates of the $3$ points of a triangle in $mathbb{R}^2$. If we identify all points in $mathbb{R}^6$ whose triangles have the same 3 angles, what manifold do we get under the quotient topology?







general-topology algebraic-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 16 at 12:12









amWhy

191k27223437




191k27223437










asked Nov 16 at 12:00









KALLE DA BAWS

162215




162215












  • What have you tried? Also please use mathjax to format your posts. There is a tutorial here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5020/90543
    – jgon
    Nov 16 at 12:05










  • Im not well versed in topology to solve this however I am curious if this has been studied and what the answer is and how to solve it.
    – KALLE DA BAWS
    Nov 16 at 12:15








  • 1




    Interesting. It's not clear that the result is a manifold though. The first step would be to find a fundamental domain in $mathbb{R}^6$.
    – Najib Idrissi
    Nov 16 at 13:40






  • 2




    It really should be regarded as an orbifold, since it has special points with more symmetry like the equilateral triangle. Try looking up "moduli space of triangles," e.g. ms.u-tokyo.ac.jp/journal/pdf/jms100108.pdf or jstor.org/stable/10.4169/….
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 16 at 22:32




















  • What have you tried? Also please use mathjax to format your posts. There is a tutorial here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5020/90543
    – jgon
    Nov 16 at 12:05










  • Im not well versed in topology to solve this however I am curious if this has been studied and what the answer is and how to solve it.
    – KALLE DA BAWS
    Nov 16 at 12:15








  • 1




    Interesting. It's not clear that the result is a manifold though. The first step would be to find a fundamental domain in $mathbb{R}^6$.
    – Najib Idrissi
    Nov 16 at 13:40






  • 2




    It really should be regarded as an orbifold, since it has special points with more symmetry like the equilateral triangle. Try looking up "moduli space of triangles," e.g. ms.u-tokyo.ac.jp/journal/pdf/jms100108.pdf or jstor.org/stable/10.4169/….
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 16 at 22:32


















What have you tried? Also please use mathjax to format your posts. There is a tutorial here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5020/90543
– jgon
Nov 16 at 12:05




What have you tried? Also please use mathjax to format your posts. There is a tutorial here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5020/90543
– jgon
Nov 16 at 12:05












Im not well versed in topology to solve this however I am curious if this has been studied and what the answer is and how to solve it.
– KALLE DA BAWS
Nov 16 at 12:15






Im not well versed in topology to solve this however I am curious if this has been studied and what the answer is and how to solve it.
– KALLE DA BAWS
Nov 16 at 12:15






1




1




Interesting. It's not clear that the result is a manifold though. The first step would be to find a fundamental domain in $mathbb{R}^6$.
– Najib Idrissi
Nov 16 at 13:40




Interesting. It's not clear that the result is a manifold though. The first step would be to find a fundamental domain in $mathbb{R}^6$.
– Najib Idrissi
Nov 16 at 13:40




2




2




It really should be regarded as an orbifold, since it has special points with more symmetry like the equilateral triangle. Try looking up "moduli space of triangles," e.g. ms.u-tokyo.ac.jp/journal/pdf/jms100108.pdf or jstor.org/stable/10.4169/….
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 16 at 22:32






It really should be regarded as an orbifold, since it has special points with more symmetry like the equilateral triangle. Try looking up "moduli space of triangles," e.g. ms.u-tokyo.ac.jp/journal/pdf/jms100108.pdf or jstor.org/stable/10.4169/….
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 16 at 22:32












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













Here we realize the plane as $Bbb C$.



Given an oriented triangle $triangle ABC$, there is unique translation that maps a selected vertex $A$ to $0$, a unique rotation that then maps the next vertex anticlockwise $B$ to the positive real axis (so that the third vertex $C$ is in the upper half-plane), and a unique dilation that then maps $B$ to $1$. By construction, this procedure gives an identification of the space of similarity classes of marked triangles with the upper half-plane $Bbb H$: $${[(triangle ABC, A)]} leftrightarrow Bbb H .$$
The standard coordinate $z$ on $Bbb H$ is essentially the parameter $z$ Somos identifies in his answer.



Now we forget about markings, which is the same as identifying $[(triangle ABC, A)] sim [(triangle ABC, B)] sim [(triangle ABC, C)]$, and we just write this equivalence class as $[triangle ABC]$. By construction, these classes are exactly the orbits of the natural action of $Bbb Z_3$ on $Bbb H$, where a choice of generator $sigma$ just rotates the choice of basepoint, say, anticlockwise: $sigma : [(triangle ABC, A)] mapsto [(triangle BCA, B)]$, so we can identify the space of similarity classes of oriented triangles: $${[triangle ABC]} leftrightarrow Bbb H / Bbb Z_3 .$$ Some elementary geometry shows that in terms of the standard coordinate $z$ of $Bbb H$, $sigma : z mapsto frac{1}{1 - z}$.



Since $Bbb Z_3$ is finite and $Bbb H$ is Hausdorff, this action is properly discontinuous, and so $Bbb H / Bbb Z_3$ is an orbifold, a space modeled on $Bbb R^n$ modulo a finite group action. All manifolds are orbifolds (taking a trivial action), but the converse is not true.



If we want instead to treat unoriented similarity classes of triangles, then we also need to identify $[triangle ABC]$ with its mirror image $[triangle ACB]$. If we denote the order $2$ map on $Bbb H$ that exchanges these by $tau$, then (1) $tau : z mapsto frac{1}{bar z}$, and (2) $sigma tau = tau sigma^2$, so $sigma$ and $tau$ generate a group isomorphic to $S_3$ that acts on $Bbb H$. We can thus identify the space of unoriented similarity classes is $Bbb H / S_3$.






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    4
    down vote













    We can exploit the scale invariance of homogeneous coordinates to capture efficiently the similarity condition and produce a description for which the action of the relevant symmetry groups are especially apparent.



    For any oriented triangle $Delta ABC$, mark one of its vertices, say, $A$, and denote the marked triangle by $(Delta ABC, A)$. Then, if the lengths of the sides opposite $A, B, C$ are respectively, $a, b, c$, consider the triple $$(t_a, t_b, t_c) := (-a + b + c, -b + c + a, -c + a + b) .$$ We can recover the relative lengths from the triple via $$(a, b, c) = left(tfrac{1}{2} (t_b + t_c), tfrac{1}{2} (t_b + t_c), tfrac{1}{2} (t_b + t_c)right) .$$



    Geometric construction of $(t_a, t_b, t_c)$ (see this GeoGebra activity for an interactive version)
    enter image description here



    Now, observe the following:




    • The sides $a, b, c$ form a triangle iff the inequality $a + b > c$ and its cyclic permutations hold, but these conditions are equivalent to $t_a, t_b, t_c > 0$. Conversely, every triple of positive numbers determine a triangle.

    • If we scale $(Delta ABC, A)$ by $lambda$, the resulting triple scales by the same factor---we get $lambda t_a, lambda t_b, lambda t_c$.

    • Similar marked triangles give rise to proportional triples.


    Thus, by regarding triples as homogeneous coordinates $[t_a, t_b, t_c]$ on a reference triangle $T$, we get an identification between oriented similarity classes of marked triangles and the interior $T^{circ}$ of $T$.



    The reference triangle $T$
    enter image description here



    Some elementary algebra shows that the equilateral class corresponds to the red point, $[1, 1, 1]$, and the isosceles classes correspond to the green lines, the loci of the points of the form $[t, t, ast]$ and its cyclic permutations.



    Now, we want to disregard the markings, that is, identify $[(triangle ABC, A)] sim [(triangle ABC, B)] sim [(triangle ABC, C)]$; we write this equivalence class as $[triangle ABC]$. These classes are exactly the orbits of the natural $Bbb Z_3$-action whose generator acts by, say, $[(triangle ABC, A)] mapsto [(triangle ABC, B)]$. Unwinding definitions, via the above identification $sigma$ just acts on $T^{circ}$ by cyclic permutation: $$sigma: [t_a, t_b, t_c] to [t_b, t_c, t_a] ,$$ or equivalently clockwise rotation by $1/3$ of a turn. Of course, viewed this way $Bbb Z_3$ is just the oriented symmetry group of $T^{circ}$. Thus:




    We may naturally identify the space of triangles modulo oriented similarity with $T^{circ} / Bbb Z_3$.




    By the argument in my other answer, this is an orbifold).



    If instead we want to consider the space of unoriented triangles modulo similarity, we must also identify $[triangle ABC, A]$ with $[triangle ACB, A]$, but this corresponds to the involution $$tau: (t_a, t_b, t_c) mapsto (t_a, t_c, t_b) ,$$ that is, reflection across the line through $[1, 0, 0]$ and $[1, 1, 1]$. This reflection and $sigma$ together generate the full group of symmetries of $T^{circ}$ and is isomorphic to $S_3$. Thus:




    We may naturally identify the space of unoriented triangles modulo similarity with the orbifold $T^{circ} / S_3$.




    Remark In fact, for any triangle $Delta ABC$, regarded as homogeneous coordinates on $Delta ABC$, $[t_a, t_b, t_c]$ is the Nagel point of $Delta ABC$; this is the triangle center complementary to the incenter.






    share|cite|improve this answer






























      up vote
      3
      down vote













      Up to similarity, triangles are determined by their three angles which must add up to 180 degrees, hence two degrees of freedom which determines a surface which is a variation of a kaleidoscope with three mirrors forming an equilateral triangle. The equilateral triangle is the fundamental domain and the sides are reflected back into the triangle by the mirrors which represent the edge cases of the similarity class of isosceles triangles. An even more exceptional case is the similarity class of equilateral triangles which corresponds to the vertices of the fundamental domain which are identified with each other.



      You can get a more conformal model using complex numbers. If complex numbers $,A,B,C,$ are the vertices of a triangle, the division ratio $,z:=(A-C)/(A-B),$ is invariant under linear transformations and hence is a similarity invariant. Using a linear transformation, we can let $A=0, B=1$ and $C$ determines the triangle up to similarity. However, $A,B,C$ can be permuted in six ways which transform $,z,$ into
      $${,1-z,,1/z,,1/(1-z),,(z-1)/z,,z/(z-1)}.$$
      A fundamental domain is given by
      $, textrm{Re}(z)le 1/2, , |z-1|le 1., $
      If orientation reversing is allowed, the fundamental domain is now restricted to $, textrm{Im}(z)>0.,$ Note that
      $, textrm{Im}(z)=0,$ corresponds to degenerate triangles.






      share|cite|improve this answer























      • Real values of the parameter $z$ correspond to collinear triples $A, B, C$, which do not define triangles, so those should not appear in the fundamental domain. In any case the fundamental domain isn't quite right: For example, taking $C = e^{pi i / 3}$, which gives the equivalence class of equilateral triangles, gives $z = omega := e^{pi i / 3}$, which is mapped under the various transformations to $omega, omega^{-1}$, but both neither of those values are in the fundamental domain.
        – Travis
        2 days ago











      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001057%2fwhat-manifold-is-produced-if-all-similar-triangles-in-the-plane-are-identified%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      4
      down vote













      Here we realize the plane as $Bbb C$.



      Given an oriented triangle $triangle ABC$, there is unique translation that maps a selected vertex $A$ to $0$, a unique rotation that then maps the next vertex anticlockwise $B$ to the positive real axis (so that the third vertex $C$ is in the upper half-plane), and a unique dilation that then maps $B$ to $1$. By construction, this procedure gives an identification of the space of similarity classes of marked triangles with the upper half-plane $Bbb H$: $${[(triangle ABC, A)]} leftrightarrow Bbb H .$$
      The standard coordinate $z$ on $Bbb H$ is essentially the parameter $z$ Somos identifies in his answer.



      Now we forget about markings, which is the same as identifying $[(triangle ABC, A)] sim [(triangle ABC, B)] sim [(triangle ABC, C)]$, and we just write this equivalence class as $[triangle ABC]$. By construction, these classes are exactly the orbits of the natural action of $Bbb Z_3$ on $Bbb H$, where a choice of generator $sigma$ just rotates the choice of basepoint, say, anticlockwise: $sigma : [(triangle ABC, A)] mapsto [(triangle BCA, B)]$, so we can identify the space of similarity classes of oriented triangles: $${[triangle ABC]} leftrightarrow Bbb H / Bbb Z_3 .$$ Some elementary geometry shows that in terms of the standard coordinate $z$ of $Bbb H$, $sigma : z mapsto frac{1}{1 - z}$.



      Since $Bbb Z_3$ is finite and $Bbb H$ is Hausdorff, this action is properly discontinuous, and so $Bbb H / Bbb Z_3$ is an orbifold, a space modeled on $Bbb R^n$ modulo a finite group action. All manifolds are orbifolds (taking a trivial action), but the converse is not true.



      If we want instead to treat unoriented similarity classes of triangles, then we also need to identify $[triangle ABC]$ with its mirror image $[triangle ACB]$. If we denote the order $2$ map on $Bbb H$ that exchanges these by $tau$, then (1) $tau : z mapsto frac{1}{bar z}$, and (2) $sigma tau = tau sigma^2$, so $sigma$ and $tau$ generate a group isomorphic to $S_3$ that acts on $Bbb H$. We can thus identify the space of unoriented similarity classes is $Bbb H / S_3$.






      share|cite|improve this answer



























        up vote
        4
        down vote













        Here we realize the plane as $Bbb C$.



        Given an oriented triangle $triangle ABC$, there is unique translation that maps a selected vertex $A$ to $0$, a unique rotation that then maps the next vertex anticlockwise $B$ to the positive real axis (so that the third vertex $C$ is in the upper half-plane), and a unique dilation that then maps $B$ to $1$. By construction, this procedure gives an identification of the space of similarity classes of marked triangles with the upper half-plane $Bbb H$: $${[(triangle ABC, A)]} leftrightarrow Bbb H .$$
        The standard coordinate $z$ on $Bbb H$ is essentially the parameter $z$ Somos identifies in his answer.



        Now we forget about markings, which is the same as identifying $[(triangle ABC, A)] sim [(triangle ABC, B)] sim [(triangle ABC, C)]$, and we just write this equivalence class as $[triangle ABC]$. By construction, these classes are exactly the orbits of the natural action of $Bbb Z_3$ on $Bbb H$, where a choice of generator $sigma$ just rotates the choice of basepoint, say, anticlockwise: $sigma : [(triangle ABC, A)] mapsto [(triangle BCA, B)]$, so we can identify the space of similarity classes of oriented triangles: $${[triangle ABC]} leftrightarrow Bbb H / Bbb Z_3 .$$ Some elementary geometry shows that in terms of the standard coordinate $z$ of $Bbb H$, $sigma : z mapsto frac{1}{1 - z}$.



        Since $Bbb Z_3$ is finite and $Bbb H$ is Hausdorff, this action is properly discontinuous, and so $Bbb H / Bbb Z_3$ is an orbifold, a space modeled on $Bbb R^n$ modulo a finite group action. All manifolds are orbifolds (taking a trivial action), but the converse is not true.



        If we want instead to treat unoriented similarity classes of triangles, then we also need to identify $[triangle ABC]$ with its mirror image $[triangle ACB]$. If we denote the order $2$ map on $Bbb H$ that exchanges these by $tau$, then (1) $tau : z mapsto frac{1}{bar z}$, and (2) $sigma tau = tau sigma^2$, so $sigma$ and $tau$ generate a group isomorphic to $S_3$ that acts on $Bbb H$. We can thus identify the space of unoriented similarity classes is $Bbb H / S_3$.






        share|cite|improve this answer

























          up vote
          4
          down vote










          up vote
          4
          down vote









          Here we realize the plane as $Bbb C$.



          Given an oriented triangle $triangle ABC$, there is unique translation that maps a selected vertex $A$ to $0$, a unique rotation that then maps the next vertex anticlockwise $B$ to the positive real axis (so that the third vertex $C$ is in the upper half-plane), and a unique dilation that then maps $B$ to $1$. By construction, this procedure gives an identification of the space of similarity classes of marked triangles with the upper half-plane $Bbb H$: $${[(triangle ABC, A)]} leftrightarrow Bbb H .$$
          The standard coordinate $z$ on $Bbb H$ is essentially the parameter $z$ Somos identifies in his answer.



          Now we forget about markings, which is the same as identifying $[(triangle ABC, A)] sim [(triangle ABC, B)] sim [(triangle ABC, C)]$, and we just write this equivalence class as $[triangle ABC]$. By construction, these classes are exactly the orbits of the natural action of $Bbb Z_3$ on $Bbb H$, where a choice of generator $sigma$ just rotates the choice of basepoint, say, anticlockwise: $sigma : [(triangle ABC, A)] mapsto [(triangle BCA, B)]$, so we can identify the space of similarity classes of oriented triangles: $${[triangle ABC]} leftrightarrow Bbb H / Bbb Z_3 .$$ Some elementary geometry shows that in terms of the standard coordinate $z$ of $Bbb H$, $sigma : z mapsto frac{1}{1 - z}$.



          Since $Bbb Z_3$ is finite and $Bbb H$ is Hausdorff, this action is properly discontinuous, and so $Bbb H / Bbb Z_3$ is an orbifold, a space modeled on $Bbb R^n$ modulo a finite group action. All manifolds are orbifolds (taking a trivial action), but the converse is not true.



          If we want instead to treat unoriented similarity classes of triangles, then we also need to identify $[triangle ABC]$ with its mirror image $[triangle ACB]$. If we denote the order $2$ map on $Bbb H$ that exchanges these by $tau$, then (1) $tau : z mapsto frac{1}{bar z}$, and (2) $sigma tau = tau sigma^2$, so $sigma$ and $tau$ generate a group isomorphic to $S_3$ that acts on $Bbb H$. We can thus identify the space of unoriented similarity classes is $Bbb H / S_3$.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Here we realize the plane as $Bbb C$.



          Given an oriented triangle $triangle ABC$, there is unique translation that maps a selected vertex $A$ to $0$, a unique rotation that then maps the next vertex anticlockwise $B$ to the positive real axis (so that the third vertex $C$ is in the upper half-plane), and a unique dilation that then maps $B$ to $1$. By construction, this procedure gives an identification of the space of similarity classes of marked triangles with the upper half-plane $Bbb H$: $${[(triangle ABC, A)]} leftrightarrow Bbb H .$$
          The standard coordinate $z$ on $Bbb H$ is essentially the parameter $z$ Somos identifies in his answer.



          Now we forget about markings, which is the same as identifying $[(triangle ABC, A)] sim [(triangle ABC, B)] sim [(triangle ABC, C)]$, and we just write this equivalence class as $[triangle ABC]$. By construction, these classes are exactly the orbits of the natural action of $Bbb Z_3$ on $Bbb H$, where a choice of generator $sigma$ just rotates the choice of basepoint, say, anticlockwise: $sigma : [(triangle ABC, A)] mapsto [(triangle BCA, B)]$, so we can identify the space of similarity classes of oriented triangles: $${[triangle ABC]} leftrightarrow Bbb H / Bbb Z_3 .$$ Some elementary geometry shows that in terms of the standard coordinate $z$ of $Bbb H$, $sigma : z mapsto frac{1}{1 - z}$.



          Since $Bbb Z_3$ is finite and $Bbb H$ is Hausdorff, this action is properly discontinuous, and so $Bbb H / Bbb Z_3$ is an orbifold, a space modeled on $Bbb R^n$ modulo a finite group action. All manifolds are orbifolds (taking a trivial action), but the converse is not true.



          If we want instead to treat unoriented similarity classes of triangles, then we also need to identify $[triangle ABC]$ with its mirror image $[triangle ACB]$. If we denote the order $2$ map on $Bbb H$ that exchanges these by $tau$, then (1) $tau : z mapsto frac{1}{bar z}$, and (2) $sigma tau = tau sigma^2$, so $sigma$ and $tau$ generate a group isomorphic to $S_3$ that acts on $Bbb H$. We can thus identify the space of unoriented similarity classes is $Bbb H / S_3$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago

























          answered 2 days ago









          Travis

          58.6k765142




          58.6k765142






















              up vote
              4
              down vote













              We can exploit the scale invariance of homogeneous coordinates to capture efficiently the similarity condition and produce a description for which the action of the relevant symmetry groups are especially apparent.



              For any oriented triangle $Delta ABC$, mark one of its vertices, say, $A$, and denote the marked triangle by $(Delta ABC, A)$. Then, if the lengths of the sides opposite $A, B, C$ are respectively, $a, b, c$, consider the triple $$(t_a, t_b, t_c) := (-a + b + c, -b + c + a, -c + a + b) .$$ We can recover the relative lengths from the triple via $$(a, b, c) = left(tfrac{1}{2} (t_b + t_c), tfrac{1}{2} (t_b + t_c), tfrac{1}{2} (t_b + t_c)right) .$$



              Geometric construction of $(t_a, t_b, t_c)$ (see this GeoGebra activity for an interactive version)
              enter image description here



              Now, observe the following:




              • The sides $a, b, c$ form a triangle iff the inequality $a + b > c$ and its cyclic permutations hold, but these conditions are equivalent to $t_a, t_b, t_c > 0$. Conversely, every triple of positive numbers determine a triangle.

              • If we scale $(Delta ABC, A)$ by $lambda$, the resulting triple scales by the same factor---we get $lambda t_a, lambda t_b, lambda t_c$.

              • Similar marked triangles give rise to proportional triples.


              Thus, by regarding triples as homogeneous coordinates $[t_a, t_b, t_c]$ on a reference triangle $T$, we get an identification between oriented similarity classes of marked triangles and the interior $T^{circ}$ of $T$.



              The reference triangle $T$
              enter image description here



              Some elementary algebra shows that the equilateral class corresponds to the red point, $[1, 1, 1]$, and the isosceles classes correspond to the green lines, the loci of the points of the form $[t, t, ast]$ and its cyclic permutations.



              Now, we want to disregard the markings, that is, identify $[(triangle ABC, A)] sim [(triangle ABC, B)] sim [(triangle ABC, C)]$; we write this equivalence class as $[triangle ABC]$. These classes are exactly the orbits of the natural $Bbb Z_3$-action whose generator acts by, say, $[(triangle ABC, A)] mapsto [(triangle ABC, B)]$. Unwinding definitions, via the above identification $sigma$ just acts on $T^{circ}$ by cyclic permutation: $$sigma: [t_a, t_b, t_c] to [t_b, t_c, t_a] ,$$ or equivalently clockwise rotation by $1/3$ of a turn. Of course, viewed this way $Bbb Z_3$ is just the oriented symmetry group of $T^{circ}$. Thus:




              We may naturally identify the space of triangles modulo oriented similarity with $T^{circ} / Bbb Z_3$.




              By the argument in my other answer, this is an orbifold).



              If instead we want to consider the space of unoriented triangles modulo similarity, we must also identify $[triangle ABC, A]$ with $[triangle ACB, A]$, but this corresponds to the involution $$tau: (t_a, t_b, t_c) mapsto (t_a, t_c, t_b) ,$$ that is, reflection across the line through $[1, 0, 0]$ and $[1, 1, 1]$. This reflection and $sigma$ together generate the full group of symmetries of $T^{circ}$ and is isomorphic to $S_3$. Thus:




              We may naturally identify the space of unoriented triangles modulo similarity with the orbifold $T^{circ} / S_3$.




              Remark In fact, for any triangle $Delta ABC$, regarded as homogeneous coordinates on $Delta ABC$, $[t_a, t_b, t_c]$ is the Nagel point of $Delta ABC$; this is the triangle center complementary to the incenter.






              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                4
                down vote













                We can exploit the scale invariance of homogeneous coordinates to capture efficiently the similarity condition and produce a description for which the action of the relevant symmetry groups are especially apparent.



                For any oriented triangle $Delta ABC$, mark one of its vertices, say, $A$, and denote the marked triangle by $(Delta ABC, A)$. Then, if the lengths of the sides opposite $A, B, C$ are respectively, $a, b, c$, consider the triple $$(t_a, t_b, t_c) := (-a + b + c, -b + c + a, -c + a + b) .$$ We can recover the relative lengths from the triple via $$(a, b, c) = left(tfrac{1}{2} (t_b + t_c), tfrac{1}{2} (t_b + t_c), tfrac{1}{2} (t_b + t_c)right) .$$



                Geometric construction of $(t_a, t_b, t_c)$ (see this GeoGebra activity for an interactive version)
                enter image description here



                Now, observe the following:




                • The sides $a, b, c$ form a triangle iff the inequality $a + b > c$ and its cyclic permutations hold, but these conditions are equivalent to $t_a, t_b, t_c > 0$. Conversely, every triple of positive numbers determine a triangle.

                • If we scale $(Delta ABC, A)$ by $lambda$, the resulting triple scales by the same factor---we get $lambda t_a, lambda t_b, lambda t_c$.

                • Similar marked triangles give rise to proportional triples.


                Thus, by regarding triples as homogeneous coordinates $[t_a, t_b, t_c]$ on a reference triangle $T$, we get an identification between oriented similarity classes of marked triangles and the interior $T^{circ}$ of $T$.



                The reference triangle $T$
                enter image description here



                Some elementary algebra shows that the equilateral class corresponds to the red point, $[1, 1, 1]$, and the isosceles classes correspond to the green lines, the loci of the points of the form $[t, t, ast]$ and its cyclic permutations.



                Now, we want to disregard the markings, that is, identify $[(triangle ABC, A)] sim [(triangle ABC, B)] sim [(triangle ABC, C)]$; we write this equivalence class as $[triangle ABC]$. These classes are exactly the orbits of the natural $Bbb Z_3$-action whose generator acts by, say, $[(triangle ABC, A)] mapsto [(triangle ABC, B)]$. Unwinding definitions, via the above identification $sigma$ just acts on $T^{circ}$ by cyclic permutation: $$sigma: [t_a, t_b, t_c] to [t_b, t_c, t_a] ,$$ or equivalently clockwise rotation by $1/3$ of a turn. Of course, viewed this way $Bbb Z_3$ is just the oriented symmetry group of $T^{circ}$. Thus:




                We may naturally identify the space of triangles modulo oriented similarity with $T^{circ} / Bbb Z_3$.




                By the argument in my other answer, this is an orbifold).



                If instead we want to consider the space of unoriented triangles modulo similarity, we must also identify $[triangle ABC, A]$ with $[triangle ACB, A]$, but this corresponds to the involution $$tau: (t_a, t_b, t_c) mapsto (t_a, t_c, t_b) ,$$ that is, reflection across the line through $[1, 0, 0]$ and $[1, 1, 1]$. This reflection and $sigma$ together generate the full group of symmetries of $T^{circ}$ and is isomorphic to $S_3$. Thus:




                We may naturally identify the space of unoriented triangles modulo similarity with the orbifold $T^{circ} / S_3$.




                Remark In fact, for any triangle $Delta ABC$, regarded as homogeneous coordinates on $Delta ABC$, $[t_a, t_b, t_c]$ is the Nagel point of $Delta ABC$; this is the triangle center complementary to the incenter.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote









                  We can exploit the scale invariance of homogeneous coordinates to capture efficiently the similarity condition and produce a description for which the action of the relevant symmetry groups are especially apparent.



                  For any oriented triangle $Delta ABC$, mark one of its vertices, say, $A$, and denote the marked triangle by $(Delta ABC, A)$. Then, if the lengths of the sides opposite $A, B, C$ are respectively, $a, b, c$, consider the triple $$(t_a, t_b, t_c) := (-a + b + c, -b + c + a, -c + a + b) .$$ We can recover the relative lengths from the triple via $$(a, b, c) = left(tfrac{1}{2} (t_b + t_c), tfrac{1}{2} (t_b + t_c), tfrac{1}{2} (t_b + t_c)right) .$$



                  Geometric construction of $(t_a, t_b, t_c)$ (see this GeoGebra activity for an interactive version)
                  enter image description here



                  Now, observe the following:




                  • The sides $a, b, c$ form a triangle iff the inequality $a + b > c$ and its cyclic permutations hold, but these conditions are equivalent to $t_a, t_b, t_c > 0$. Conversely, every triple of positive numbers determine a triangle.

                  • If we scale $(Delta ABC, A)$ by $lambda$, the resulting triple scales by the same factor---we get $lambda t_a, lambda t_b, lambda t_c$.

                  • Similar marked triangles give rise to proportional triples.


                  Thus, by regarding triples as homogeneous coordinates $[t_a, t_b, t_c]$ on a reference triangle $T$, we get an identification between oriented similarity classes of marked triangles and the interior $T^{circ}$ of $T$.



                  The reference triangle $T$
                  enter image description here



                  Some elementary algebra shows that the equilateral class corresponds to the red point, $[1, 1, 1]$, and the isosceles classes correspond to the green lines, the loci of the points of the form $[t, t, ast]$ and its cyclic permutations.



                  Now, we want to disregard the markings, that is, identify $[(triangle ABC, A)] sim [(triangle ABC, B)] sim [(triangle ABC, C)]$; we write this equivalence class as $[triangle ABC]$. These classes are exactly the orbits of the natural $Bbb Z_3$-action whose generator acts by, say, $[(triangle ABC, A)] mapsto [(triangle ABC, B)]$. Unwinding definitions, via the above identification $sigma$ just acts on $T^{circ}$ by cyclic permutation: $$sigma: [t_a, t_b, t_c] to [t_b, t_c, t_a] ,$$ or equivalently clockwise rotation by $1/3$ of a turn. Of course, viewed this way $Bbb Z_3$ is just the oriented symmetry group of $T^{circ}$. Thus:




                  We may naturally identify the space of triangles modulo oriented similarity with $T^{circ} / Bbb Z_3$.




                  By the argument in my other answer, this is an orbifold).



                  If instead we want to consider the space of unoriented triangles modulo similarity, we must also identify $[triangle ABC, A]$ with $[triangle ACB, A]$, but this corresponds to the involution $$tau: (t_a, t_b, t_c) mapsto (t_a, t_c, t_b) ,$$ that is, reflection across the line through $[1, 0, 0]$ and $[1, 1, 1]$. This reflection and $sigma$ together generate the full group of symmetries of $T^{circ}$ and is isomorphic to $S_3$. Thus:




                  We may naturally identify the space of unoriented triangles modulo similarity with the orbifold $T^{circ} / S_3$.




                  Remark In fact, for any triangle $Delta ABC$, regarded as homogeneous coordinates on $Delta ABC$, $[t_a, t_b, t_c]$ is the Nagel point of $Delta ABC$; this is the triangle center complementary to the incenter.






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  We can exploit the scale invariance of homogeneous coordinates to capture efficiently the similarity condition and produce a description for which the action of the relevant symmetry groups are especially apparent.



                  For any oriented triangle $Delta ABC$, mark one of its vertices, say, $A$, and denote the marked triangle by $(Delta ABC, A)$. Then, if the lengths of the sides opposite $A, B, C$ are respectively, $a, b, c$, consider the triple $$(t_a, t_b, t_c) := (-a + b + c, -b + c + a, -c + a + b) .$$ We can recover the relative lengths from the triple via $$(a, b, c) = left(tfrac{1}{2} (t_b + t_c), tfrac{1}{2} (t_b + t_c), tfrac{1}{2} (t_b + t_c)right) .$$



                  Geometric construction of $(t_a, t_b, t_c)$ (see this GeoGebra activity for an interactive version)
                  enter image description here



                  Now, observe the following:




                  • The sides $a, b, c$ form a triangle iff the inequality $a + b > c$ and its cyclic permutations hold, but these conditions are equivalent to $t_a, t_b, t_c > 0$. Conversely, every triple of positive numbers determine a triangle.

                  • If we scale $(Delta ABC, A)$ by $lambda$, the resulting triple scales by the same factor---we get $lambda t_a, lambda t_b, lambda t_c$.

                  • Similar marked triangles give rise to proportional triples.


                  Thus, by regarding triples as homogeneous coordinates $[t_a, t_b, t_c]$ on a reference triangle $T$, we get an identification between oriented similarity classes of marked triangles and the interior $T^{circ}$ of $T$.



                  The reference triangle $T$
                  enter image description here



                  Some elementary algebra shows that the equilateral class corresponds to the red point, $[1, 1, 1]$, and the isosceles classes correspond to the green lines, the loci of the points of the form $[t, t, ast]$ and its cyclic permutations.



                  Now, we want to disregard the markings, that is, identify $[(triangle ABC, A)] sim [(triangle ABC, B)] sim [(triangle ABC, C)]$; we write this equivalence class as $[triangle ABC]$. These classes are exactly the orbits of the natural $Bbb Z_3$-action whose generator acts by, say, $[(triangle ABC, A)] mapsto [(triangle ABC, B)]$. Unwinding definitions, via the above identification $sigma$ just acts on $T^{circ}$ by cyclic permutation: $$sigma: [t_a, t_b, t_c] to [t_b, t_c, t_a] ,$$ or equivalently clockwise rotation by $1/3$ of a turn. Of course, viewed this way $Bbb Z_3$ is just the oriented symmetry group of $T^{circ}$. Thus:




                  We may naturally identify the space of triangles modulo oriented similarity with $T^{circ} / Bbb Z_3$.




                  By the argument in my other answer, this is an orbifold).



                  If instead we want to consider the space of unoriented triangles modulo similarity, we must also identify $[triangle ABC, A]$ with $[triangle ACB, A]$, but this corresponds to the involution $$tau: (t_a, t_b, t_c) mapsto (t_a, t_c, t_b) ,$$ that is, reflection across the line through $[1, 0, 0]$ and $[1, 1, 1]$. This reflection and $sigma$ together generate the full group of symmetries of $T^{circ}$ and is isomorphic to $S_3$. Thus:




                  We may naturally identify the space of unoriented triangles modulo similarity with the orbifold $T^{circ} / S_3$.




                  Remark In fact, for any triangle $Delta ABC$, regarded as homogeneous coordinates on $Delta ABC$, $[t_a, t_b, t_c]$ is the Nagel point of $Delta ABC$; this is the triangle center complementary to the incenter.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited 2 days ago

























                  answered 2 days ago









                  Travis

                  58.6k765142




                  58.6k765142






















                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote













                      Up to similarity, triangles are determined by their three angles which must add up to 180 degrees, hence two degrees of freedom which determines a surface which is a variation of a kaleidoscope with three mirrors forming an equilateral triangle. The equilateral triangle is the fundamental domain and the sides are reflected back into the triangle by the mirrors which represent the edge cases of the similarity class of isosceles triangles. An even more exceptional case is the similarity class of equilateral triangles which corresponds to the vertices of the fundamental domain which are identified with each other.



                      You can get a more conformal model using complex numbers. If complex numbers $,A,B,C,$ are the vertices of a triangle, the division ratio $,z:=(A-C)/(A-B),$ is invariant under linear transformations and hence is a similarity invariant. Using a linear transformation, we can let $A=0, B=1$ and $C$ determines the triangle up to similarity. However, $A,B,C$ can be permuted in six ways which transform $,z,$ into
                      $${,1-z,,1/z,,1/(1-z),,(z-1)/z,,z/(z-1)}.$$
                      A fundamental domain is given by
                      $, textrm{Re}(z)le 1/2, , |z-1|le 1., $
                      If orientation reversing is allowed, the fundamental domain is now restricted to $, textrm{Im}(z)>0.,$ Note that
                      $, textrm{Im}(z)=0,$ corresponds to degenerate triangles.






                      share|cite|improve this answer























                      • Real values of the parameter $z$ correspond to collinear triples $A, B, C$, which do not define triangles, so those should not appear in the fundamental domain. In any case the fundamental domain isn't quite right: For example, taking $C = e^{pi i / 3}$, which gives the equivalence class of equilateral triangles, gives $z = omega := e^{pi i / 3}$, which is mapped under the various transformations to $omega, omega^{-1}$, but both neither of those values are in the fundamental domain.
                        – Travis
                        2 days ago















                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote













                      Up to similarity, triangles are determined by their three angles which must add up to 180 degrees, hence two degrees of freedom which determines a surface which is a variation of a kaleidoscope with three mirrors forming an equilateral triangle. The equilateral triangle is the fundamental domain and the sides are reflected back into the triangle by the mirrors which represent the edge cases of the similarity class of isosceles triangles. An even more exceptional case is the similarity class of equilateral triangles which corresponds to the vertices of the fundamental domain which are identified with each other.



                      You can get a more conformal model using complex numbers. If complex numbers $,A,B,C,$ are the vertices of a triangle, the division ratio $,z:=(A-C)/(A-B),$ is invariant under linear transformations and hence is a similarity invariant. Using a linear transformation, we can let $A=0, B=1$ and $C$ determines the triangle up to similarity. However, $A,B,C$ can be permuted in six ways which transform $,z,$ into
                      $${,1-z,,1/z,,1/(1-z),,(z-1)/z,,z/(z-1)}.$$
                      A fundamental domain is given by
                      $, textrm{Re}(z)le 1/2, , |z-1|le 1., $
                      If orientation reversing is allowed, the fundamental domain is now restricted to $, textrm{Im}(z)>0.,$ Note that
                      $, textrm{Im}(z)=0,$ corresponds to degenerate triangles.






                      share|cite|improve this answer























                      • Real values of the parameter $z$ correspond to collinear triples $A, B, C$, which do not define triangles, so those should not appear in the fundamental domain. In any case the fundamental domain isn't quite right: For example, taking $C = e^{pi i / 3}$, which gives the equivalence class of equilateral triangles, gives $z = omega := e^{pi i / 3}$, which is mapped under the various transformations to $omega, omega^{-1}$, but both neither of those values are in the fundamental domain.
                        – Travis
                        2 days ago













                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote









                      Up to similarity, triangles are determined by their three angles which must add up to 180 degrees, hence two degrees of freedom which determines a surface which is a variation of a kaleidoscope with three mirrors forming an equilateral triangle. The equilateral triangle is the fundamental domain and the sides are reflected back into the triangle by the mirrors which represent the edge cases of the similarity class of isosceles triangles. An even more exceptional case is the similarity class of equilateral triangles which corresponds to the vertices of the fundamental domain which are identified with each other.



                      You can get a more conformal model using complex numbers. If complex numbers $,A,B,C,$ are the vertices of a triangle, the division ratio $,z:=(A-C)/(A-B),$ is invariant under linear transformations and hence is a similarity invariant. Using a linear transformation, we can let $A=0, B=1$ and $C$ determines the triangle up to similarity. However, $A,B,C$ can be permuted in six ways which transform $,z,$ into
                      $${,1-z,,1/z,,1/(1-z),,(z-1)/z,,z/(z-1)}.$$
                      A fundamental domain is given by
                      $, textrm{Re}(z)le 1/2, , |z-1|le 1., $
                      If orientation reversing is allowed, the fundamental domain is now restricted to $, textrm{Im}(z)>0.,$ Note that
                      $, textrm{Im}(z)=0,$ corresponds to degenerate triangles.






                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      Up to similarity, triangles are determined by their three angles which must add up to 180 degrees, hence two degrees of freedom which determines a surface which is a variation of a kaleidoscope with three mirrors forming an equilateral triangle. The equilateral triangle is the fundamental domain and the sides are reflected back into the triangle by the mirrors which represent the edge cases of the similarity class of isosceles triangles. An even more exceptional case is the similarity class of equilateral triangles which corresponds to the vertices of the fundamental domain which are identified with each other.



                      You can get a more conformal model using complex numbers. If complex numbers $,A,B,C,$ are the vertices of a triangle, the division ratio $,z:=(A-C)/(A-B),$ is invariant under linear transformations and hence is a similarity invariant. Using a linear transformation, we can let $A=0, B=1$ and $C$ determines the triangle up to similarity. However, $A,B,C$ can be permuted in six ways which transform $,z,$ into
                      $${,1-z,,1/z,,1/(1-z),,(z-1)/z,,z/(z-1)}.$$
                      A fundamental domain is given by
                      $, textrm{Re}(z)le 1/2, , |z-1|le 1., $
                      If orientation reversing is allowed, the fundamental domain is now restricted to $, textrm{Im}(z)>0.,$ Note that
                      $, textrm{Im}(z)=0,$ corresponds to degenerate triangles.







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited 2 days ago

























                      answered Nov 16 at 14:11









                      Somos

                      12.7k11034




                      12.7k11034












                      • Real values of the parameter $z$ correspond to collinear triples $A, B, C$, which do not define triangles, so those should not appear in the fundamental domain. In any case the fundamental domain isn't quite right: For example, taking $C = e^{pi i / 3}$, which gives the equivalence class of equilateral triangles, gives $z = omega := e^{pi i / 3}$, which is mapped under the various transformations to $omega, omega^{-1}$, but both neither of those values are in the fundamental domain.
                        – Travis
                        2 days ago


















                      • Real values of the parameter $z$ correspond to collinear triples $A, B, C$, which do not define triangles, so those should not appear in the fundamental domain. In any case the fundamental domain isn't quite right: For example, taking $C = e^{pi i / 3}$, which gives the equivalence class of equilateral triangles, gives $z = omega := e^{pi i / 3}$, which is mapped under the various transformations to $omega, omega^{-1}$, but both neither of those values are in the fundamental domain.
                        – Travis
                        2 days ago
















                      Real values of the parameter $z$ correspond to collinear triples $A, B, C$, which do not define triangles, so those should not appear in the fundamental domain. In any case the fundamental domain isn't quite right: For example, taking $C = e^{pi i / 3}$, which gives the equivalence class of equilateral triangles, gives $z = omega := e^{pi i / 3}$, which is mapped under the various transformations to $omega, omega^{-1}$, but both neither of those values are in the fundamental domain.
                      – Travis
                      2 days ago




                      Real values of the parameter $z$ correspond to collinear triples $A, B, C$, which do not define triangles, so those should not appear in the fundamental domain. In any case the fundamental domain isn't quite right: For example, taking $C = e^{pi i / 3}$, which gives the equivalence class of equilateral triangles, gives $z = omega := e^{pi i / 3}$, which is mapped under the various transformations to $omega, omega^{-1}$, but both neither of those values are in the fundamental domain.
                      – Travis
                      2 days ago


















                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded



















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001057%2fwhat-manifold-is-produced-if-all-similar-triangles-in-the-plane-are-identified%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bundesstraße 106

                      Verónica Boquete

                      Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten