Japanese Temple Geometry











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












enter image description here



enter image description here



Hello, I was trying to solve this problem using descarte circle theorem for my maths report. I looked through the solution but I don't understand the part in the answer, where it says the two solutions are pn+1, pn-1. Can someone explain it for me. Thanks!



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Instead of pictures, please type out the problem definition and solution, and please use MathJax when typing the equations. This way, your question is much more readible and will more likely get answers.
    – Matti P.
    Jun 12 at 13:16










  • What are those "remarks above"?
    – Aretino
    Jun 12 at 13:59















up vote
3
down vote

favorite












enter image description here



enter image description here



Hello, I was trying to solve this problem using descarte circle theorem for my maths report. I looked through the solution but I don't understand the part in the answer, where it says the two solutions are pn+1, pn-1. Can someone explain it for me. Thanks!



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Instead of pictures, please type out the problem definition and solution, and please use MathJax when typing the equations. This way, your question is much more readible and will more likely get answers.
    – Matti P.
    Jun 12 at 13:16










  • What are those "remarks above"?
    – Aretino
    Jun 12 at 13:59













up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











enter image description here



enter image description here



Hello, I was trying to solve this problem using descarte circle theorem for my maths report. I looked through the solution but I don't understand the part in the answer, where it says the two solutions are pn+1, pn-1. Can someone explain it for me. Thanks!



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question















enter image description here



enter image description here



Hello, I was trying to solve this problem using descarte circle theorem for my maths report. I looked through the solution but I don't understand the part in the answer, where it says the two solutions are pn+1, pn-1. Can someone explain it for me. Thanks!



enter image description here







geometry euclidean-geometry circle quadratics sangaku






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 23 at 6:34









Jean-Claude Arbaut

14.7k63363




14.7k63363










asked Jun 12 at 13:08









Rosa Kang

161




161












  • Instead of pictures, please type out the problem definition and solution, and please use MathJax when typing the equations. This way, your question is much more readible and will more likely get answers.
    – Matti P.
    Jun 12 at 13:16










  • What are those "remarks above"?
    – Aretino
    Jun 12 at 13:59


















  • Instead of pictures, please type out the problem definition and solution, and please use MathJax when typing the equations. This way, your question is much more readible and will more likely get answers.
    – Matti P.
    Jun 12 at 13:16










  • What are those "remarks above"?
    – Aretino
    Jun 12 at 13:59
















Instead of pictures, please type out the problem definition and solution, and please use MathJax when typing the equations. This way, your question is much more readible and will more likely get answers.
– Matti P.
Jun 12 at 13:16




Instead of pictures, please type out the problem definition and solution, and please use MathJax when typing the equations. This way, your question is much more readible and will more likely get answers.
– Matti P.
Jun 12 at 13:16












What are those "remarks above"?
– Aretino
Jun 12 at 13:59




What are those "remarks above"?
– Aretino
Jun 12 at 13:59










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













Consider this form of the equation
$$2(p_1^2 + p_n^2 + p_{n+1}^2 + a^2 ) = ( p_1 + p_n + p_{n+1} - a )^2 tag{1}$$
and take it back a step by replacing $nto n-1$:
$$2(p_1^2 + p_{n-1}^2 + p_{n}^2 + a^2 ) = ( p_1 + p_{n-1} + p_{n} - a )^2 tag{2}$$
We see that $(2)$ is identical to $(1)$, except that $p_{n-1}$ replaces $p_{n+1}$. Therefore, $p_{n+1}$ and $p_{n-1}$ are the roots of the monic quadratic equation
$$2(p_1^2 + p_{n}^2 + x^2 + a^2 ) = ( p_1 + p_{n} + x - a )^2 tag{3}$$
(Perhaps this trick is discussed in the "remarks above" or Yoshida's solution.) From there, Vieta's formulas allow us to write the coefficient of $x$ in terms of those roots, which gives this recursion:
$$p_{n-1} + p_{n+1} = -2(a-p_1-p_n)$$
Since $p_1$ has evidently been assigned the value of $2a$ in the quoted solution, we get the recursion in the stated form. $square$






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2816902%2fjapanese-temple-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote













    Consider this form of the equation
    $$2(p_1^2 + p_n^2 + p_{n+1}^2 + a^2 ) = ( p_1 + p_n + p_{n+1} - a )^2 tag{1}$$
    and take it back a step by replacing $nto n-1$:
    $$2(p_1^2 + p_{n-1}^2 + p_{n}^2 + a^2 ) = ( p_1 + p_{n-1} + p_{n} - a )^2 tag{2}$$
    We see that $(2)$ is identical to $(1)$, except that $p_{n-1}$ replaces $p_{n+1}$. Therefore, $p_{n+1}$ and $p_{n-1}$ are the roots of the monic quadratic equation
    $$2(p_1^2 + p_{n}^2 + x^2 + a^2 ) = ( p_1 + p_{n} + x - a )^2 tag{3}$$
    (Perhaps this trick is discussed in the "remarks above" or Yoshida's solution.) From there, Vieta's formulas allow us to write the coefficient of $x$ in terms of those roots, which gives this recursion:
    $$p_{n-1} + p_{n+1} = -2(a-p_1-p_n)$$
    Since $p_1$ has evidently been assigned the value of $2a$ in the quoted solution, we get the recursion in the stated form. $square$






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      3
      down vote













      Consider this form of the equation
      $$2(p_1^2 + p_n^2 + p_{n+1}^2 + a^2 ) = ( p_1 + p_n + p_{n+1} - a )^2 tag{1}$$
      and take it back a step by replacing $nto n-1$:
      $$2(p_1^2 + p_{n-1}^2 + p_{n}^2 + a^2 ) = ( p_1 + p_{n-1} + p_{n} - a )^2 tag{2}$$
      We see that $(2)$ is identical to $(1)$, except that $p_{n-1}$ replaces $p_{n+1}$. Therefore, $p_{n+1}$ and $p_{n-1}$ are the roots of the monic quadratic equation
      $$2(p_1^2 + p_{n}^2 + x^2 + a^2 ) = ( p_1 + p_{n} + x - a )^2 tag{3}$$
      (Perhaps this trick is discussed in the "remarks above" or Yoshida's solution.) From there, Vieta's formulas allow us to write the coefficient of $x$ in terms of those roots, which gives this recursion:
      $$p_{n-1} + p_{n+1} = -2(a-p_1-p_n)$$
      Since $p_1$ has evidently been assigned the value of $2a$ in the quoted solution, we get the recursion in the stated form. $square$






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        3
        down vote










        up vote
        3
        down vote









        Consider this form of the equation
        $$2(p_1^2 + p_n^2 + p_{n+1}^2 + a^2 ) = ( p_1 + p_n + p_{n+1} - a )^2 tag{1}$$
        and take it back a step by replacing $nto n-1$:
        $$2(p_1^2 + p_{n-1}^2 + p_{n}^2 + a^2 ) = ( p_1 + p_{n-1} + p_{n} - a )^2 tag{2}$$
        We see that $(2)$ is identical to $(1)$, except that $p_{n-1}$ replaces $p_{n+1}$. Therefore, $p_{n+1}$ and $p_{n-1}$ are the roots of the monic quadratic equation
        $$2(p_1^2 + p_{n}^2 + x^2 + a^2 ) = ( p_1 + p_{n} + x - a )^2 tag{3}$$
        (Perhaps this trick is discussed in the "remarks above" or Yoshida's solution.) From there, Vieta's formulas allow us to write the coefficient of $x$ in terms of those roots, which gives this recursion:
        $$p_{n-1} + p_{n+1} = -2(a-p_1-p_n)$$
        Since $p_1$ has evidently been assigned the value of $2a$ in the quoted solution, we get the recursion in the stated form. $square$






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Consider this form of the equation
        $$2(p_1^2 + p_n^2 + p_{n+1}^2 + a^2 ) = ( p_1 + p_n + p_{n+1} - a )^2 tag{1}$$
        and take it back a step by replacing $nto n-1$:
        $$2(p_1^2 + p_{n-1}^2 + p_{n}^2 + a^2 ) = ( p_1 + p_{n-1} + p_{n} - a )^2 tag{2}$$
        We see that $(2)$ is identical to $(1)$, except that $p_{n-1}$ replaces $p_{n+1}$. Therefore, $p_{n+1}$ and $p_{n-1}$ are the roots of the monic quadratic equation
        $$2(p_1^2 + p_{n}^2 + x^2 + a^2 ) = ( p_1 + p_{n} + x - a )^2 tag{3}$$
        (Perhaps this trick is discussed in the "remarks above" or Yoshida's solution.) From there, Vieta's formulas allow us to write the coefficient of $x$ in terms of those roots, which gives this recursion:
        $$p_{n-1} + p_{n+1} = -2(a-p_1-p_n)$$
        Since $p_1$ has evidently been assigned the value of $2a$ in the quoted solution, we get the recursion in the stated form. $square$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 23 at 7:27

























        answered Jun 12 at 15:20









        Blue

        47.3k870149




        47.3k870149






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2816902%2fjapanese-temple-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten