Why is the dual tree to a measured geodesic lamination in a compact hyperbolic surface not complete?











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Let $M$ be a closed connected surface and $mathcal{F}$ a minimal (every leaf is dense) measured foliation (as, for example, in Thurston's work on surfaces) on $M$. Let $tilde{M}$ be the universal cover of $M$ and $tilde{mathcal{F}}$ the pullback of $mathcal{F}$ to $tilde{M}$.



Consider the leaf space of $tilde{mathcal{F}}$, $mathcal{T}=tilde{M}/tilde{mathcal{F}}$. Define the distance between two leaves of $tilde{mathcal{F}}$ as the minimum of the transverse measures of arcs joining the two leaves, we obtain a distance on $mathcal{T}$ which turns $mathcal{T}$ into a tree.



I have seen the following statement.




If the genus of $M$ is $geq 2$, $mathcal{T}$ is not complete for this distance.




Why is this true?



I also saw a notion "dual tree", which also shows up from time to time when I tried to search for related topics, from the book Hyperbolic manifolds and Discrete Groups (for geodesic laminations there). Is this indeed the concept that I am looking for?



Thanks in advance!










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $M$ be a closed connected surface and $mathcal{F}$ a minimal (every leaf is dense) measured foliation (as, for example, in Thurston's work on surfaces) on $M$. Let $tilde{M}$ be the universal cover of $M$ and $tilde{mathcal{F}}$ the pullback of $mathcal{F}$ to $tilde{M}$.



    Consider the leaf space of $tilde{mathcal{F}}$, $mathcal{T}=tilde{M}/tilde{mathcal{F}}$. Define the distance between two leaves of $tilde{mathcal{F}}$ as the minimum of the transverse measures of arcs joining the two leaves, we obtain a distance on $mathcal{T}$ which turns $mathcal{T}$ into a tree.



    I have seen the following statement.




    If the genus of $M$ is $geq 2$, $mathcal{T}$ is not complete for this distance.




    Why is this true?



    I also saw a notion "dual tree", which also shows up from time to time when I tried to search for related topics, from the book Hyperbolic manifolds and Discrete Groups (for geodesic laminations there). Is this indeed the concept that I am looking for?



    Thanks in advance!










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $M$ be a closed connected surface and $mathcal{F}$ a minimal (every leaf is dense) measured foliation (as, for example, in Thurston's work on surfaces) on $M$. Let $tilde{M}$ be the universal cover of $M$ and $tilde{mathcal{F}}$ the pullback of $mathcal{F}$ to $tilde{M}$.



      Consider the leaf space of $tilde{mathcal{F}}$, $mathcal{T}=tilde{M}/tilde{mathcal{F}}$. Define the distance between two leaves of $tilde{mathcal{F}}$ as the minimum of the transverse measures of arcs joining the two leaves, we obtain a distance on $mathcal{T}$ which turns $mathcal{T}$ into a tree.



      I have seen the following statement.




      If the genus of $M$ is $geq 2$, $mathcal{T}$ is not complete for this distance.




      Why is this true?



      I also saw a notion "dual tree", which also shows up from time to time when I tried to search for related topics, from the book Hyperbolic manifolds and Discrete Groups (for geodesic laminations there). Is this indeed the concept that I am looking for?



      Thanks in advance!










      share|cite|improve this question















      Let $M$ be a closed connected surface and $mathcal{F}$ a minimal (every leaf is dense) measured foliation (as, for example, in Thurston's work on surfaces) on $M$. Let $tilde{M}$ be the universal cover of $M$ and $tilde{mathcal{F}}$ the pullback of $mathcal{F}$ to $tilde{M}$.



      Consider the leaf space of $tilde{mathcal{F}}$, $mathcal{T}=tilde{M}/tilde{mathcal{F}}$. Define the distance between two leaves of $tilde{mathcal{F}}$ as the minimum of the transverse measures of arcs joining the two leaves, we obtain a distance on $mathcal{T}$ which turns $mathcal{T}$ into a tree.



      I have seen the following statement.




      If the genus of $M$ is $geq 2$, $mathcal{T}$ is not complete for this distance.




      Why is this true?



      I also saw a notion "dual tree", which also shows up from time to time when I tried to search for related topics, from the book Hyperbolic manifolds and Discrete Groups (for geodesic laminations there). Is this indeed the concept that I am looking for?



      Thanks in advance!







      dynamical-systems hyperbolic-geometry geometric-topology






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 23 at 8:04

























      asked Nov 23 at 7:46









      chikurin

      799




      799






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Here's a rough description of why $mathcal T$ is incomplete.



          Start at some point $x_0$ of $tilde M$. Let $ell_0$ be a lonnnng leaf segment of $tilde{mathcal F}$ with one endpoint on $x_0$, and let $y_0$ be the opposite endpoint. Let $tau_0$ be a transverse arc of transverse measure $2^{-0}=1$ with one endpoint at $y_0$. Let $x_1$ be the opposite endpoint. Continue by induction: assuming $x_n$ has been defined, let $ell_n$ be a lonnnng leaf segment with one endpoint on $x_n$, let $y_n$ be the opposite endpoint, let $tau_n$ be a transverse arc of transverse measure $2^{-n}$, and let $x_{n+1}$ be the opposite endpoint. You get an infinite path of the form
          $$ell_0 tau_0 ell_1 tau_1 ell_2 tau_2 cdots
          $$

          The total transverse measure of the initial segment $ell_0 tau_0 cdots ell_n tau_n$ that connects $x_0$ to $x_n$ is equal to $2-2^{-n}$, and this converges to $2$. By careful choice of the $tau$'s in the induction step you can guarantee that this initial segment is "quasitransverse", implying that $2-2^{-n}$ is the minimum of the transverse measure of any arc from $x_0$ to $x_n$. So, in the dual tree $mathcal T$, you get an isometric embedding $[0,2) mapsto mathcal T$. But, this embedding has no point to converge to as the parameter in $[0,2)$ approaches $2$; in fact, one can check that this infinite path escapes all compact subsets of $tilde M$. So $mathcal T$ is incomplete.



          By the way, another place I know, where the dual tree is explained very clearly, is in Otal's book "Le théorème d'hyperbolisation pour les variétés fibrées de dimension 3", in the chapter on Skora's theorem.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • I think I can understand what you are saying, but what I am confused about is, after taking quotient, isn't a lonnng leaf got identified to a single point in the tree?
            – chikurin
            Nov 24 at 16:14






          • 1




            That's exactly correct. And therefore the infinite concatenation $ell_0tau_0ell_1tau_1ell_2tau_2cdots$, after passing to the quotient $mathcal T$, could (by abusing notation) be written as $tau_0 tau_1 tau_2cdots$, which is the image of the isometric embedding $[0,2) mapsto mathcal T$.
            – Lee Mosher
            Nov 24 at 16:21












          • Ohhh, I now see... Thanks a lot!!
            – chikurin
            Nov 25 at 6:18










          • Another thing, I tried to read the book "The Hyperbolization Theorem for Fibered 3-Manifolds" with my lame French for an hour and then found an English translation that day, in case there is anyone who does not read French and is not aware of the existence of an English translation. :)
            – chikurin
            Nov 30 at 1:58











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010087%2fwhy-is-the-dual-tree-to-a-measured-geodesic-lamination-in-a-compact-hyperbolic-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Here's a rough description of why $mathcal T$ is incomplete.



          Start at some point $x_0$ of $tilde M$. Let $ell_0$ be a lonnnng leaf segment of $tilde{mathcal F}$ with one endpoint on $x_0$, and let $y_0$ be the opposite endpoint. Let $tau_0$ be a transverse arc of transverse measure $2^{-0}=1$ with one endpoint at $y_0$. Let $x_1$ be the opposite endpoint. Continue by induction: assuming $x_n$ has been defined, let $ell_n$ be a lonnnng leaf segment with one endpoint on $x_n$, let $y_n$ be the opposite endpoint, let $tau_n$ be a transverse arc of transverse measure $2^{-n}$, and let $x_{n+1}$ be the opposite endpoint. You get an infinite path of the form
          $$ell_0 tau_0 ell_1 tau_1 ell_2 tau_2 cdots
          $$

          The total transverse measure of the initial segment $ell_0 tau_0 cdots ell_n tau_n$ that connects $x_0$ to $x_n$ is equal to $2-2^{-n}$, and this converges to $2$. By careful choice of the $tau$'s in the induction step you can guarantee that this initial segment is "quasitransverse", implying that $2-2^{-n}$ is the minimum of the transverse measure of any arc from $x_0$ to $x_n$. So, in the dual tree $mathcal T$, you get an isometric embedding $[0,2) mapsto mathcal T$. But, this embedding has no point to converge to as the parameter in $[0,2)$ approaches $2$; in fact, one can check that this infinite path escapes all compact subsets of $tilde M$. So $mathcal T$ is incomplete.



          By the way, another place I know, where the dual tree is explained very clearly, is in Otal's book "Le théorème d'hyperbolisation pour les variétés fibrées de dimension 3", in the chapter on Skora's theorem.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • I think I can understand what you are saying, but what I am confused about is, after taking quotient, isn't a lonnng leaf got identified to a single point in the tree?
            – chikurin
            Nov 24 at 16:14






          • 1




            That's exactly correct. And therefore the infinite concatenation $ell_0tau_0ell_1tau_1ell_2tau_2cdots$, after passing to the quotient $mathcal T$, could (by abusing notation) be written as $tau_0 tau_1 tau_2cdots$, which is the image of the isometric embedding $[0,2) mapsto mathcal T$.
            – Lee Mosher
            Nov 24 at 16:21












          • Ohhh, I now see... Thanks a lot!!
            – chikurin
            Nov 25 at 6:18










          • Another thing, I tried to read the book "The Hyperbolization Theorem for Fibered 3-Manifolds" with my lame French for an hour and then found an English translation that day, in case there is anyone who does not read French and is not aware of the existence of an English translation. :)
            – chikurin
            Nov 30 at 1:58















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Here's a rough description of why $mathcal T$ is incomplete.



          Start at some point $x_0$ of $tilde M$. Let $ell_0$ be a lonnnng leaf segment of $tilde{mathcal F}$ with one endpoint on $x_0$, and let $y_0$ be the opposite endpoint. Let $tau_0$ be a transverse arc of transverse measure $2^{-0}=1$ with one endpoint at $y_0$. Let $x_1$ be the opposite endpoint. Continue by induction: assuming $x_n$ has been defined, let $ell_n$ be a lonnnng leaf segment with one endpoint on $x_n$, let $y_n$ be the opposite endpoint, let $tau_n$ be a transverse arc of transverse measure $2^{-n}$, and let $x_{n+1}$ be the opposite endpoint. You get an infinite path of the form
          $$ell_0 tau_0 ell_1 tau_1 ell_2 tau_2 cdots
          $$

          The total transverse measure of the initial segment $ell_0 tau_0 cdots ell_n tau_n$ that connects $x_0$ to $x_n$ is equal to $2-2^{-n}$, and this converges to $2$. By careful choice of the $tau$'s in the induction step you can guarantee that this initial segment is "quasitransverse", implying that $2-2^{-n}$ is the minimum of the transverse measure of any arc from $x_0$ to $x_n$. So, in the dual tree $mathcal T$, you get an isometric embedding $[0,2) mapsto mathcal T$. But, this embedding has no point to converge to as the parameter in $[0,2)$ approaches $2$; in fact, one can check that this infinite path escapes all compact subsets of $tilde M$. So $mathcal T$ is incomplete.



          By the way, another place I know, where the dual tree is explained very clearly, is in Otal's book "Le théorème d'hyperbolisation pour les variétés fibrées de dimension 3", in the chapter on Skora's theorem.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • I think I can understand what you are saying, but what I am confused about is, after taking quotient, isn't a lonnng leaf got identified to a single point in the tree?
            – chikurin
            Nov 24 at 16:14






          • 1




            That's exactly correct. And therefore the infinite concatenation $ell_0tau_0ell_1tau_1ell_2tau_2cdots$, after passing to the quotient $mathcal T$, could (by abusing notation) be written as $tau_0 tau_1 tau_2cdots$, which is the image of the isometric embedding $[0,2) mapsto mathcal T$.
            – Lee Mosher
            Nov 24 at 16:21












          • Ohhh, I now see... Thanks a lot!!
            – chikurin
            Nov 25 at 6:18










          • Another thing, I tried to read the book "The Hyperbolization Theorem for Fibered 3-Manifolds" with my lame French for an hour and then found an English translation that day, in case there is anyone who does not read French and is not aware of the existence of an English translation. :)
            – chikurin
            Nov 30 at 1:58













          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          Here's a rough description of why $mathcal T$ is incomplete.



          Start at some point $x_0$ of $tilde M$. Let $ell_0$ be a lonnnng leaf segment of $tilde{mathcal F}$ with one endpoint on $x_0$, and let $y_0$ be the opposite endpoint. Let $tau_0$ be a transverse arc of transverse measure $2^{-0}=1$ with one endpoint at $y_0$. Let $x_1$ be the opposite endpoint. Continue by induction: assuming $x_n$ has been defined, let $ell_n$ be a lonnnng leaf segment with one endpoint on $x_n$, let $y_n$ be the opposite endpoint, let $tau_n$ be a transverse arc of transverse measure $2^{-n}$, and let $x_{n+1}$ be the opposite endpoint. You get an infinite path of the form
          $$ell_0 tau_0 ell_1 tau_1 ell_2 tau_2 cdots
          $$

          The total transverse measure of the initial segment $ell_0 tau_0 cdots ell_n tau_n$ that connects $x_0$ to $x_n$ is equal to $2-2^{-n}$, and this converges to $2$. By careful choice of the $tau$'s in the induction step you can guarantee that this initial segment is "quasitransverse", implying that $2-2^{-n}$ is the minimum of the transverse measure of any arc from $x_0$ to $x_n$. So, in the dual tree $mathcal T$, you get an isometric embedding $[0,2) mapsto mathcal T$. But, this embedding has no point to converge to as the parameter in $[0,2)$ approaches $2$; in fact, one can check that this infinite path escapes all compact subsets of $tilde M$. So $mathcal T$ is incomplete.



          By the way, another place I know, where the dual tree is explained very clearly, is in Otal's book "Le théorème d'hyperbolisation pour les variétés fibrées de dimension 3", in the chapter on Skora's theorem.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Here's a rough description of why $mathcal T$ is incomplete.



          Start at some point $x_0$ of $tilde M$. Let $ell_0$ be a lonnnng leaf segment of $tilde{mathcal F}$ with one endpoint on $x_0$, and let $y_0$ be the opposite endpoint. Let $tau_0$ be a transverse arc of transverse measure $2^{-0}=1$ with one endpoint at $y_0$. Let $x_1$ be the opposite endpoint. Continue by induction: assuming $x_n$ has been defined, let $ell_n$ be a lonnnng leaf segment with one endpoint on $x_n$, let $y_n$ be the opposite endpoint, let $tau_n$ be a transverse arc of transverse measure $2^{-n}$, and let $x_{n+1}$ be the opposite endpoint. You get an infinite path of the form
          $$ell_0 tau_0 ell_1 tau_1 ell_2 tau_2 cdots
          $$

          The total transverse measure of the initial segment $ell_0 tau_0 cdots ell_n tau_n$ that connects $x_0$ to $x_n$ is equal to $2-2^{-n}$, and this converges to $2$. By careful choice of the $tau$'s in the induction step you can guarantee that this initial segment is "quasitransverse", implying that $2-2^{-n}$ is the minimum of the transverse measure of any arc from $x_0$ to $x_n$. So, in the dual tree $mathcal T$, you get an isometric embedding $[0,2) mapsto mathcal T$. But, this embedding has no point to converge to as the parameter in $[0,2)$ approaches $2$; in fact, one can check that this infinite path escapes all compact subsets of $tilde M$. So $mathcal T$ is incomplete.



          By the way, another place I know, where the dual tree is explained very clearly, is in Otal's book "Le théorème d'hyperbolisation pour les variétés fibrées de dimension 3", in the chapter on Skora's theorem.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 29 at 22:36

























          answered Nov 23 at 16:37









          Lee Mosher

          47.7k33681




          47.7k33681












          • I think I can understand what you are saying, but what I am confused about is, after taking quotient, isn't a lonnng leaf got identified to a single point in the tree?
            – chikurin
            Nov 24 at 16:14






          • 1




            That's exactly correct. And therefore the infinite concatenation $ell_0tau_0ell_1tau_1ell_2tau_2cdots$, after passing to the quotient $mathcal T$, could (by abusing notation) be written as $tau_0 tau_1 tau_2cdots$, which is the image of the isometric embedding $[0,2) mapsto mathcal T$.
            – Lee Mosher
            Nov 24 at 16:21












          • Ohhh, I now see... Thanks a lot!!
            – chikurin
            Nov 25 at 6:18










          • Another thing, I tried to read the book "The Hyperbolization Theorem for Fibered 3-Manifolds" with my lame French for an hour and then found an English translation that day, in case there is anyone who does not read French and is not aware of the existence of an English translation. :)
            – chikurin
            Nov 30 at 1:58


















          • I think I can understand what you are saying, but what I am confused about is, after taking quotient, isn't a lonnng leaf got identified to a single point in the tree?
            – chikurin
            Nov 24 at 16:14






          • 1




            That's exactly correct. And therefore the infinite concatenation $ell_0tau_0ell_1tau_1ell_2tau_2cdots$, after passing to the quotient $mathcal T$, could (by abusing notation) be written as $tau_0 tau_1 tau_2cdots$, which is the image of the isometric embedding $[0,2) mapsto mathcal T$.
            – Lee Mosher
            Nov 24 at 16:21












          • Ohhh, I now see... Thanks a lot!!
            – chikurin
            Nov 25 at 6:18










          • Another thing, I tried to read the book "The Hyperbolization Theorem for Fibered 3-Manifolds" with my lame French for an hour and then found an English translation that day, in case there is anyone who does not read French and is not aware of the existence of an English translation. :)
            – chikurin
            Nov 30 at 1:58
















          I think I can understand what you are saying, but what I am confused about is, after taking quotient, isn't a lonnng leaf got identified to a single point in the tree?
          – chikurin
          Nov 24 at 16:14




          I think I can understand what you are saying, but what I am confused about is, after taking quotient, isn't a lonnng leaf got identified to a single point in the tree?
          – chikurin
          Nov 24 at 16:14




          1




          1




          That's exactly correct. And therefore the infinite concatenation $ell_0tau_0ell_1tau_1ell_2tau_2cdots$, after passing to the quotient $mathcal T$, could (by abusing notation) be written as $tau_0 tau_1 tau_2cdots$, which is the image of the isometric embedding $[0,2) mapsto mathcal T$.
          – Lee Mosher
          Nov 24 at 16:21






          That's exactly correct. And therefore the infinite concatenation $ell_0tau_0ell_1tau_1ell_2tau_2cdots$, after passing to the quotient $mathcal T$, could (by abusing notation) be written as $tau_0 tau_1 tau_2cdots$, which is the image of the isometric embedding $[0,2) mapsto mathcal T$.
          – Lee Mosher
          Nov 24 at 16:21














          Ohhh, I now see... Thanks a lot!!
          – chikurin
          Nov 25 at 6:18




          Ohhh, I now see... Thanks a lot!!
          – chikurin
          Nov 25 at 6:18












          Another thing, I tried to read the book "The Hyperbolization Theorem for Fibered 3-Manifolds" with my lame French for an hour and then found an English translation that day, in case there is anyone who does not read French and is not aware of the existence of an English translation. :)
          – chikurin
          Nov 30 at 1:58




          Another thing, I tried to read the book "The Hyperbolization Theorem for Fibered 3-Manifolds" with my lame French for an hour and then found an English translation that day, in case there is anyone who does not read French and is not aware of the existence of an English translation. :)
          – chikurin
          Nov 30 at 1:58


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010087%2fwhy-is-the-dual-tree-to-a-measured-geodesic-lamination-in-a-compact-hyperbolic-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Le Mesnil-Réaume

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

          web3.py web3.isConnected() returns false always