Paracompactness of the projectified bundle over a paracompact space
$begingroup$
Consider a complex rank $n$ Vector Bundle $V rightarrow X$. It is a standard Argument in the construction of Chern classes to consider the orthogonal complement to the tautological line bundle carried by $P(V)$, where $P(V)$ is the projectified bundle over $X$ with fiber $mathbb C P^{n-1}$, basically $V setminus X$ with $mathbb C$-multiplication factored out.
I have found numerous references to the fact that $P(V)$ is paracompact, provided that $X$ is, but no rigorous proof. The idea must somehow be to use that products with one factor paracompact and the other compact are paracompact, which would take care of the case $V cong X times mathbb C^n$. As to other cases, say, $X= U_1 cup U_2$ and $V$ is trivial over the $U_i$, my problem would be that the $U_i$ need not be paracompact, as they are open in $X$. Perhaps there is a way around this by looking at gluing constructions to recover $V$ as $(U_1 times mathbb C^n) dotcup (U_2 times mathbb C^n)/ sim$, but I am stuck. Any pointers?
general-topology vector-bundles paracompactness
edited Dec 9 '18 at 3:28
Eric Wofsey
186k14214341
asked Jan 11 '17 at 22:57
TheHumanHighwayTheHumanHighway
711113
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a complex rank $n$ Vector Bundle $V rightarrow X$. It is a standard Argument in the construction of Chern classes to consider the orthogonal complement to the tautological line bundle carried by $P(V)$, where $P(V)$ is the projectified bundle over $X$ with fiber $mathbb C P^{n-1}$, basically $V setminus X$ with $mathbb C$-multiplication factored out.
I have found numerous references to the fact that $P(V)$ is paracompact, provided that $X$ is, but no rigorous proof. The idea must somehow be to use that products with one factor paracompact and the other compact are paracompact, which would take care of the case $V cong X times mathbb C^n$. As to other cases, say, $X= U_1 cup U_2$ and $V$ is trivial over the $U_i$, my problem would be that the $U_i$ need not be paracompact, as they are open in $X$. Perhaps there is a way around this by looking at gluing constructions to recover $V$ as $(U_1 times mathbb C^n) dotcup (U_2 times mathbb C^n)/ sim$, but I am stuck. Any pointers?
general-topology vector-bundles paracompactness
edited Dec 9 '18 at 3:28
Eric Wofsey
186k14214341
asked Jan 11 '17 at 22:57
TheHumanHighwayTheHumanHighway
711113
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a complex rank $n$ Vector Bundle $V rightarrow X$. It is a standard Argument in the construction of Chern classes to consider the orthogonal complement to the tautological line bundle carried by $P(V)$, where $P(V)$ is the projectified bundle over $X$ with fiber $mathbb C P^{n-1}$, basically $V setminus X$ with $mathbb C$-multiplication factored out.
I have found numerous references to the fact that $P(V)$ is paracompact, provided that $X$ is, but no rigorous proof. The idea must somehow be to use that products with one factor paracompact and the other compact are paracompact, which would take care of the case $V cong X times mathbb C^n$. As to other cases, say, $X= U_1 cup U_2$ and $V$ is trivial over the $U_i$, my problem would be that the $U_i$ need not be paracompact, as they are open in $X$. Perhaps there is a way around this by looking at gluing constructions to recover $V$ as $(U_1 times mathbb C^n) dotcup (U_2 times mathbb C^n)/ sim$, but I am stuck. Any pointers?
general-topology vector-bundles paracompactness
edited Dec 9 '18 at 3:28
Eric Wofsey
186k14214341
asked Jan 11 '17 at 22:57
TheHumanHighwayTheHumanHighway
711113
$endgroup$
Consider a complex rank $n$ Vector Bundle $V rightarrow X$. It is a standard Argument in the construction of Chern classes to consider the orthogonal complement to the tautological line bundle carried by $P(V)$, where $P(V)$ is the projectified bundle over $X$ with fiber $mathbb C P^{n-1}$, basically $V setminus X$ with $mathbb C$-multiplication factored out.
I have found numerous references to the fact that $P(V)$ is paracompact, provided that $X$ is, but no rigorous proof. The idea must somehow be to use that products with one factor paracompact and the other compact are paracompact, which would take care of the case $V cong X times mathbb C^n$. As to other cases, say, $X= U_1 cup U_2$ and $V$ is trivial over the $U_i$, my problem would be that the $U_i$ need not be paracompact, as they are open in $X$. Perhaps there is a way around this by looking at gluing constructions to recover $V$ as $(U_1 times mathbb C^n) dotcup (U_2 times mathbb C^n)/ sim$, but I am stuck. Any pointers?
general-topology vector-bundles paracompactness
general-topology vector-bundles paracompactness
edited Dec 9 '18 at 3:28
Eric Wofsey
186k14214341
asked Jan 11 '17 at 22:57
TheHumanHighwayTheHumanHighway
711113
edited Dec 9 '18 at 3:28
Eric Wofsey
186k14214341
asked Jan 11 '17 at 22:57
TheHumanHighwayTheHumanHighway
711113
edited Dec 9 '18 at 3:28
Eric Wofsey
186k14214341
edited Dec 9 '18 at 3:28
Eric Wofsey
186k14214341
edited Dec 9 '18 at 3:28
Eric Wofsey
186k14214341
186k14214341
asked Jan 11 '17 at 22:57
TheHumanHighwayTheHumanHighway
711113
asked Jan 11 '17 at 22:57
TheHumanHighwayTheHumanHighway
711113
asked Jan 11 '17 at 22:57
TheHumanHighwayTheHumanHighway
711113
711113
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think I got it. The idea is to take an open cover ${U_alpha}_{alpha in J}$ and first prove a "Shrinking" lemma for paracompact spaces. Even though $X$ is normal, given its paracompactness, the standard Shrinking lemma (for a proof see Munkres) needs a finite cover (I guess the proof goes through for a countably infinite one as well). But we can find a locally finite refinement with same index set, ${V_alpha}_{alpha in J}$ such that it still is a cover and $V_alpha subset bar{V}_alphasubset U_alpha$. Now if $V rightarrow X$ is trivial over each $U_alpha$, then certainly over each $bar V_alpha$, too.
But closed subsets of paracompact spaces are paracompact, and since $P(V)|_{bar V_alpha} cong bar V_alpha times mathbb CP^{n-1}$, the disjoint union $amalg_alpha (bar V_alpha times mathbb CP^{n-1})$ is paracompact, for products consisting of a paracompact and a compact space are paracompact, and disjoint unions of paracompact spaces are paracompact. Now the projections induced from the gluing construction from which we recover $P(V) rightarrow X$ are closed, hence by Michael's theorem $P(V) cong amalg_alpha (bar V_alpha times mathbb CP^{n-1})/sim$ is paracompact.
answered Feb 1 '17 at 9:57
TheHumanHighwayTheHumanHighway
711113
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2094049%2fparacompactness-of-the-projectified-bundle-over-a-paracompact-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think I got it. The idea is to take an open cover ${U_alpha}_{alpha in J}$ and first prove a "Shrinking" lemma for paracompact spaces. Even though $X$ is normal, given its paracompactness, the standard Shrinking lemma (for a proof see Munkres) needs a finite cover (I guess the proof goes through for a countably infinite one as well). But we can find a locally finite refinement with same index set, ${V_alpha}_{alpha in J}$ such that it still is a cover and $V_alpha subset bar{V}_alphasubset U_alpha$. Now if $V rightarrow X$ is trivial over each $U_alpha$, then certainly over each $bar V_alpha$, too.
But closed subsets of paracompact spaces are paracompact, and since $P(V)|_{bar V_alpha} cong bar V_alpha times mathbb CP^{n-1}$, the disjoint union $amalg_alpha (bar V_alpha times mathbb CP^{n-1})$ is paracompact, for products consisting of a paracompact and a compact space are paracompact, and disjoint unions of paracompact spaces are paracompact. Now the projections induced from the gluing construction from which we recover $P(V) rightarrow X$ are closed, hence by Michael's theorem $P(V) cong amalg_alpha (bar V_alpha times mathbb CP^{n-1})/sim$ is paracompact.
answered Feb 1 '17 at 9:57
TheHumanHighwayTheHumanHighway
711113
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think I got it. The idea is to take an open cover ${U_alpha}_{alpha in J}$ and first prove a "Shrinking" lemma for paracompact spaces. Even though $X$ is normal, given its paracompactness, the standard Shrinking lemma (for a proof see Munkres) needs a finite cover (I guess the proof goes through for a countably infinite one as well). But we can find a locally finite refinement with same index set, ${V_alpha}_{alpha in J}$ such that it still is a cover and $V_alpha subset bar{V}_alphasubset U_alpha$. Now if $V rightarrow X$ is trivial over each $U_alpha$, then certainly over each $bar V_alpha$, too.
But closed subsets of paracompact spaces are paracompact, and since $P(V)|_{bar V_alpha} cong bar V_alpha times mathbb CP^{n-1}$, the disjoint union $amalg_alpha (bar V_alpha times mathbb CP^{n-1})$ is paracompact, for products consisting of a paracompact and a compact space are paracompact, and disjoint unions of paracompact spaces are paracompact. Now the projections induced from the gluing construction from which we recover $P(V) rightarrow X$ are closed, hence by Michael's theorem $P(V) cong amalg_alpha (bar V_alpha times mathbb CP^{n-1})/sim$ is paracompact.
answered Feb 1 '17 at 9:57
TheHumanHighwayTheHumanHighway
711113
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think I got it. The idea is to take an open cover ${U_alpha}_{alpha in J}$ and first prove a "Shrinking" lemma for paracompact spaces. Even though $X$ is normal, given its paracompactness, the standard Shrinking lemma (for a proof see Munkres) needs a finite cover (I guess the proof goes through for a countably infinite one as well). But we can find a locally finite refinement with same index set, ${V_alpha}_{alpha in J}$ such that it still is a cover and $V_alpha subset bar{V}_alphasubset U_alpha$. Now if $V rightarrow X$ is trivial over each $U_alpha$, then certainly over each $bar V_alpha$, too.
But closed subsets of paracompact spaces are paracompact, and since $P(V)|_{bar V_alpha} cong bar V_alpha times mathbb CP^{n-1}$, the disjoint union $amalg_alpha (bar V_alpha times mathbb CP^{n-1})$ is paracompact, for products consisting of a paracompact and a compact space are paracompact, and disjoint unions of paracompact spaces are paracompact. Now the projections induced from the gluing construction from which we recover $P(V) rightarrow X$ are closed, hence by Michael's theorem $P(V) cong amalg_alpha (bar V_alpha times mathbb CP^{n-1})/sim$ is paracompact.
answered Feb 1 '17 at 9:57
TheHumanHighwayTheHumanHighway
711113
$endgroup$
I think I got it. The idea is to take an open cover ${U_alpha}_{alpha in J}$ and first prove a "Shrinking" lemma for paracompact spaces. Even though $X$ is normal, given its paracompactness, the standard Shrinking lemma (for a proof see Munkres) needs a finite cover (I guess the proof goes through for a countably infinite one as well). But we can find a locally finite refinement with same index set, ${V_alpha}_{alpha in J}$ such that it still is a cover and $V_alpha subset bar{V}_alphasubset U_alpha$. Now if $V rightarrow X$ is trivial over each $U_alpha$, then certainly over each $bar V_alpha$, too.
But closed subsets of paracompact spaces are paracompact, and since $P(V)|_{bar V_alpha} cong bar V_alpha times mathbb CP^{n-1}$, the disjoint union $amalg_alpha (bar V_alpha times mathbb CP^{n-1})$ is paracompact, for products consisting of a paracompact and a compact space are paracompact, and disjoint unions of paracompact spaces are paracompact. Now the projections induced from the gluing construction from which we recover $P(V) rightarrow X$ are closed, hence by Michael's theorem $P(V) cong amalg_alpha (bar V_alpha times mathbb CP^{n-1})/sim$ is paracompact.
answered Feb 1 '17 at 9:57
TheHumanHighwayTheHumanHighway
711113
answered Feb 1 '17 at 9:57
TheHumanHighwayTheHumanHighway
711113
answered Feb 1 '17 at 9:57
TheHumanHighwayTheHumanHighway
711113
answered Feb 1 '17 at 9:57
TheHumanHighwayTheHumanHighway
711113
711113
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2094049%2fparacompactness-of-the-projectified-bundle-over-a-paracompact-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
