Product of paracompact spaces












1












$begingroup$


I know that the product of a compact space and a paracompact space is paracompact, and that in general the product of two paracompact spaces are not paracompact.



Question: Is there a weakest condition on a space $Y$ such that $X times Y$ is paracompact Hausdorff for every paracompact Hausdorff space $X$??










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean that $X$ is given and we can choose the condition on $Y$ dependent on $X$? Or, do you mean that: what is a condition $P$ such that for all $X$ paracompact (Hausdorff?) and all $Y$ with condition $P$, we have that $X times Y$ is paracompact?
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Feb 21 '15 at 11:20










  • $begingroup$
    I mean the second formulation : is there a condition $P$ such that ... (Yes for Hausdorff !!)
    $endgroup$
    – user171326
    Feb 21 '15 at 11:23
















1












$begingroup$


I know that the product of a compact space and a paracompact space is paracompact, and that in general the product of two paracompact spaces are not paracompact.



Question: Is there a weakest condition on a space $Y$ such that $X times Y$ is paracompact Hausdorff for every paracompact Hausdorff space $X$??










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean that $X$ is given and we can choose the condition on $Y$ dependent on $X$? Or, do you mean that: what is a condition $P$ such that for all $X$ paracompact (Hausdorff?) and all $Y$ with condition $P$, we have that $X times Y$ is paracompact?
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Feb 21 '15 at 11:20










  • $begingroup$
    I mean the second formulation : is there a condition $P$ such that ... (Yes for Hausdorff !!)
    $endgroup$
    – user171326
    Feb 21 '15 at 11:23














1












1








1


0



$begingroup$


I know that the product of a compact space and a paracompact space is paracompact, and that in general the product of two paracompact spaces are not paracompact.



Question: Is there a weakest condition on a space $Y$ such that $X times Y$ is paracompact Hausdorff for every paracompact Hausdorff space $X$??










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I know that the product of a compact space and a paracompact space is paracompact, and that in general the product of two paracompact spaces are not paracompact.



Question: Is there a weakest condition on a space $Y$ such that $X times Y$ is paracompact Hausdorff for every paracompact Hausdorff space $X$??







general-topology paracompactness






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 9 '18 at 3:19









Eric Wofsey

186k14214341




186k14214341










asked Feb 21 '15 at 0:08







user171326



















  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean that $X$ is given and we can choose the condition on $Y$ dependent on $X$? Or, do you mean that: what is a condition $P$ such that for all $X$ paracompact (Hausdorff?) and all $Y$ with condition $P$, we have that $X times Y$ is paracompact?
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Feb 21 '15 at 11:20










  • $begingroup$
    I mean the second formulation : is there a condition $P$ such that ... (Yes for Hausdorff !!)
    $endgroup$
    – user171326
    Feb 21 '15 at 11:23


















  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean that $X$ is given and we can choose the condition on $Y$ dependent on $X$? Or, do you mean that: what is a condition $P$ such that for all $X$ paracompact (Hausdorff?) and all $Y$ with condition $P$, we have that $X times Y$ is paracompact?
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Feb 21 '15 at 11:20










  • $begingroup$
    I mean the second formulation : is there a condition $P$ such that ... (Yes for Hausdorff !!)
    $endgroup$
    – user171326
    Feb 21 '15 at 11:23
















$begingroup$
Do you mean that $X$ is given and we can choose the condition on $Y$ dependent on $X$? Or, do you mean that: what is a condition $P$ such that for all $X$ paracompact (Hausdorff?) and all $Y$ with condition $P$, we have that $X times Y$ is paracompact?
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Feb 21 '15 at 11:20




$begingroup$
Do you mean that $X$ is given and we can choose the condition on $Y$ dependent on $X$? Or, do you mean that: what is a condition $P$ such that for all $X$ paracompact (Hausdorff?) and all $Y$ with condition $P$, we have that $X times Y$ is paracompact?
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Feb 21 '15 at 11:20












$begingroup$
I mean the second formulation : is there a condition $P$ such that ... (Yes for Hausdorff !!)
$endgroup$
– user171326
Feb 21 '15 at 11:23




$begingroup$
I mean the second formulation : is there a condition $P$ such that ... (Yes for Hausdorff !!)
$endgroup$
– user171326
Feb 21 '15 at 11:23










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

So you are looking for conditions $P$ such that, for all $X$ paracompact Hausdorff and all $Y$ with condition $P$, $X times Y$ is paracompact Hausdorff.



Clearly such a condition $P$ needs to imply Hausdorff paracompactness itself (but $P$ = "paracompact Hausdorff" does not work, as you stated already, and as the Sorgenfrey line shows).



This paper by Suzuki already mentions a few $P$ that work:




  • $P$ = "Y paracompact Hausdorff, and $Y$ is a countable union of locally compact closed subsets" (due to K. Morita)

  • $P$ = "$Y$ is Hausdorff and the closed continuous image of a locally compact Hausdorff paracompact space."


He also proves a more general $P$ than both of these. Morita already showed that for a metric space $Y$ it is in fact necessary and sufficient to be a union of a sigma-locally finite collection of compact subsets in order to have the property that the product with any
paracompact space is again paracompact, which is closely related to the Michael line example (which shows that the irrationals times a paracompact space need not be paracompact).



This paper has even more conditions and a nice survey.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    @N.H. Glad to help. I believe there has been some more developments (using topological games) as well. I'm not sure there is an exact characterisation yet..
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Feb 21 '15 at 17:47











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1158251%2fproduct-of-paracompact-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown
























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

So you are looking for conditions $P$ such that, for all $X$ paracompact Hausdorff and all $Y$ with condition $P$, $X times Y$ is paracompact Hausdorff.



Clearly such a condition $P$ needs to imply Hausdorff paracompactness itself (but $P$ = "paracompact Hausdorff" does not work, as you stated already, and as the Sorgenfrey line shows).



This paper by Suzuki already mentions a few $P$ that work:




  • $P$ = "Y paracompact Hausdorff, and $Y$ is a countable union of locally compact closed subsets" (due to K. Morita)

  • $P$ = "$Y$ is Hausdorff and the closed continuous image of a locally compact Hausdorff paracompact space."


He also proves a more general $P$ than both of these. Morita already showed that for a metric space $Y$ it is in fact necessary and sufficient to be a union of a sigma-locally finite collection of compact subsets in order to have the property that the product with any
paracompact space is again paracompact, which is closely related to the Michael line example (which shows that the irrationals times a paracompact space need not be paracompact).



This paper has even more conditions and a nice survey.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    @N.H. Glad to help. I believe there has been some more developments (using topological games) as well. I'm not sure there is an exact characterisation yet..
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Feb 21 '15 at 17:47
















3












$begingroup$

So you are looking for conditions $P$ such that, for all $X$ paracompact Hausdorff and all $Y$ with condition $P$, $X times Y$ is paracompact Hausdorff.



Clearly such a condition $P$ needs to imply Hausdorff paracompactness itself (but $P$ = "paracompact Hausdorff" does not work, as you stated already, and as the Sorgenfrey line shows).



This paper by Suzuki already mentions a few $P$ that work:




  • $P$ = "Y paracompact Hausdorff, and $Y$ is a countable union of locally compact closed subsets" (due to K. Morita)

  • $P$ = "$Y$ is Hausdorff and the closed continuous image of a locally compact Hausdorff paracompact space."


He also proves a more general $P$ than both of these. Morita already showed that for a metric space $Y$ it is in fact necessary and sufficient to be a union of a sigma-locally finite collection of compact subsets in order to have the property that the product with any
paracompact space is again paracompact, which is closely related to the Michael line example (which shows that the irrationals times a paracompact space need not be paracompact).



This paper has even more conditions and a nice survey.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    @N.H. Glad to help. I believe there has been some more developments (using topological games) as well. I'm not sure there is an exact characterisation yet..
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Feb 21 '15 at 17:47














3












3








3





$begingroup$

So you are looking for conditions $P$ such that, for all $X$ paracompact Hausdorff and all $Y$ with condition $P$, $X times Y$ is paracompact Hausdorff.



Clearly such a condition $P$ needs to imply Hausdorff paracompactness itself (but $P$ = "paracompact Hausdorff" does not work, as you stated already, and as the Sorgenfrey line shows).



This paper by Suzuki already mentions a few $P$ that work:




  • $P$ = "Y paracompact Hausdorff, and $Y$ is a countable union of locally compact closed subsets" (due to K. Morita)

  • $P$ = "$Y$ is Hausdorff and the closed continuous image of a locally compact Hausdorff paracompact space."


He also proves a more general $P$ than both of these. Morita already showed that for a metric space $Y$ it is in fact necessary and sufficient to be a union of a sigma-locally finite collection of compact subsets in order to have the property that the product with any
paracompact space is again paracompact, which is closely related to the Michael line example (which shows that the irrationals times a paracompact space need not be paracompact).



This paper has even more conditions and a nice survey.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



So you are looking for conditions $P$ such that, for all $X$ paracompact Hausdorff and all $Y$ with condition $P$, $X times Y$ is paracompact Hausdorff.



Clearly such a condition $P$ needs to imply Hausdorff paracompactness itself (but $P$ = "paracompact Hausdorff" does not work, as you stated already, and as the Sorgenfrey line shows).



This paper by Suzuki already mentions a few $P$ that work:




  • $P$ = "Y paracompact Hausdorff, and $Y$ is a countable union of locally compact closed subsets" (due to K. Morita)

  • $P$ = "$Y$ is Hausdorff and the closed continuous image of a locally compact Hausdorff paracompact space."


He also proves a more general $P$ than both of these. Morita already showed that for a metric space $Y$ it is in fact necessary and sufficient to be a union of a sigma-locally finite collection of compact subsets in order to have the property that the product with any
paracompact space is again paracompact, which is closely related to the Michael line example (which shows that the irrationals times a paracompact space need not be paracompact).



This paper has even more conditions and a nice survey.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Feb 21 '15 at 12:32

























answered Feb 21 '15 at 12:20









Henno BrandsmaHenno Brandsma

109k347115




109k347115












  • $begingroup$
    @N.H. Glad to help. I believe there has been some more developments (using topological games) as well. I'm not sure there is an exact characterisation yet..
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Feb 21 '15 at 17:47


















  • $begingroup$
    @N.H. Glad to help. I believe there has been some more developments (using topological games) as well. I'm not sure there is an exact characterisation yet..
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Feb 21 '15 at 17:47
















$begingroup$
@N.H. Glad to help. I believe there has been some more developments (using topological games) as well. I'm not sure there is an exact characterisation yet..
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Feb 21 '15 at 17:47




$begingroup$
@N.H. Glad to help. I believe there has been some more developments (using topological games) as well. I'm not sure there is an exact characterisation yet..
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Feb 21 '15 at 17:47


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1158251%2fproduct-of-paracompact-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Le Mesnil-Réaume

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

web3.py web3.isConnected() returns false always