Word problem about a diminishing military contract?












1












$begingroup$


Here's a question I've had a bit of trouble answering:




A military member is assigned $5$ years to serve abroad. For each month they serve in which they have exemplary behavior though, $10$ days is taken off their $5$ year contract. Assuming they have exemplary behavior every month, how much time do they have to serve altogether? How many days get taken off their $5$ year contract?




You can't just take $60text{ months} times 10 text{ days}$ and then deduct it from the $5$ years because they won't be serving all $5$ years.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Here's a question I've had a bit of trouble answering:




    A military member is assigned $5$ years to serve abroad. For each month they serve in which they have exemplary behavior though, $10$ days is taken off their $5$ year contract. Assuming they have exemplary behavior every month, how much time do they have to serve altogether? How many days get taken off their $5$ year contract?




    You can't just take $60text{ months} times 10 text{ days}$ and then deduct it from the $5$ years because they won't be serving all $5$ years.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Here's a question I've had a bit of trouble answering:




      A military member is assigned $5$ years to serve abroad. For each month they serve in which they have exemplary behavior though, $10$ days is taken off their $5$ year contract. Assuming they have exemplary behavior every month, how much time do they have to serve altogether? How many days get taken off their $5$ year contract?




      You can't just take $60text{ months} times 10 text{ days}$ and then deduct it from the $5$ years because they won't be serving all $5$ years.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Here's a question I've had a bit of trouble answering:




      A military member is assigned $5$ years to serve abroad. For each month they serve in which they have exemplary behavior though, $10$ days is taken off their $5$ year contract. Assuming they have exemplary behavior every month, how much time do they have to serve altogether? How many days get taken off their $5$ year contract?




      You can't just take $60text{ months} times 10 text{ days}$ and then deduct it from the $5$ years because they won't be serving all $5$ years.







      algebra-precalculus arithmetic word-problem






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 9 '18 at 20:07









      Mike Pierce

      11.5k103584




      11.5k103584










      asked Dec 9 '18 at 6:57









      Chan CChan C

      37047




      37047






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Observe that after 36 months, that is 3 years, 360 days are taken off the $5$ year contract. Now, after 3 years, the contract remains of $4$ years and 5 days, which means $12$ months and $5$ days more to go. But for every month, $10$ days get cut off from the contract. So, after $1$st month, the contractual time remaining is $10$ months $25$ days. After $2$nd month, we are left with $9$ months $15$ days. After the $3$rd, we are left with $8$ months $5$ days. After the $4$th, we are left with $6$ months $25$ days. After the $5$th month, time left would be $5$ months $15$ days. After $6$th month, we have $4$ months $5$ days. After $7$th month, we are left with $2$ months $25$ days which will be served completely.



          Hence, the total time of service would be $3$ years, $9$ months and $5$ days.



          If the leap year concept is taken into consideration, the calculation might change a bit. But the process is the same as described above.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            How would you do this with equations? Say if there was a problem with many years and not dealing with just integers.
            $endgroup$
            – Chan C
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:20










          • $begingroup$
            Also some months have 31 days vs 30.
            $endgroup$
            – Chan C
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:23










          • $begingroup$
            Why will the $2$ month$- 25$ day period be served completely? Shouldn't it be $3$ years, $9$ months, $5$ days of service?
            $endgroup$
            – Shubham Johri
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:23












          • $begingroup$
            @ShubhamJohri You are correct. The time of service will be what you say
            $endgroup$
            – Aniruddha Deshmukh
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:45






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Of course! But then the total reduction will not cause decrease in the number of months. Only decrease in number of days. So, I did it in my mind and did not write it here which is why I made a mistake while writing. I am correcting it now.
            $endgroup$
            – Aniruddha Deshmukh
            Dec 10 '18 at 5:48



















          2












          $begingroup$

          To do this with equations, measure the time in days, and ignore leap years for now. There are 365 days in a year and 12 months, so every $frac {365}{12}$ days, they earn $10$ days credit. Let $d$ be the number of days that they actually serve. Then they earn $$frac {10}{frac {365}{12}}d = frac{120}{365}d$$days of credit total.



          The actual days on duty plus the credited days will add up to the full 5 years of service:



          $$d + frac{120}{365}d = 5times 365\d= frac{5cdot 365}{frac{485}{365}} = 1373.5 text{ days}$$
          which rounds up to 1374 days, or 3 years, 9 months, 5 days.



          But of course, somewhere in the 5 year term, we are going to have a leap year day. Possibly two, but likely just one. So the calculation is one or two days short. Thus the actual duty would be 3 years, 9 months, 6 days (or 7 days).



          Note that this "solution by equation" makes a number of simplifying assumptions. The credit days accrue steadily, instead of in 10-day lumps at the beginning of each month. The months are all of even length, just under 30.5 days.



          The equation method only estimates the complexity of the real situation, and thus, its result is less accurate. In order to model the situation more accuratebrly, you need to break it down into details, as Aniruddha Deshmukh has done. Even that solution is only approximate, as an exact calculation would require more information than is given in the question:




          • On what year, month and day does the tour of duty start? (The year is only needed to figure out where the leap year days fall.)

          • How exactly are the credit days awarded? (For example, on the first day of the following month? Or maybe a month later, or possibly continuously as my equation calculates.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            When Aniruddha stopped at month 7 " After 7th month, we are left with 2 months 25 days which will be served completely." couldn't he of went on for 1 more period or 2 depending on which day the 10 day reduction happens on. In that case it would match the equation model that you did. I don't understand why he stopped on month 7. Thanks I appreciate your help.
            $endgroup$
            – Chan C
            Dec 10 '18 at 1:57






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @ChanC - I hadn't double-checked Aniruddha's numbers, so I didn't notice the error. I was just aware of the extra error in setting it up as I had, and assumed that accounted for the difference. I've adjusted my remarks now. But the warning about the innaccuracies of this method still holds.
            $endgroup$
            – Paul Sinclair
            Dec 10 '18 at 23:46











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032101%2fword-problem-about-a-diminishing-military-contract%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          Observe that after 36 months, that is 3 years, 360 days are taken off the $5$ year contract. Now, after 3 years, the contract remains of $4$ years and 5 days, which means $12$ months and $5$ days more to go. But for every month, $10$ days get cut off from the contract. So, after $1$st month, the contractual time remaining is $10$ months $25$ days. After $2$nd month, we are left with $9$ months $15$ days. After the $3$rd, we are left with $8$ months $5$ days. After the $4$th, we are left with $6$ months $25$ days. After the $5$th month, time left would be $5$ months $15$ days. After $6$th month, we have $4$ months $5$ days. After $7$th month, we are left with $2$ months $25$ days which will be served completely.



          Hence, the total time of service would be $3$ years, $9$ months and $5$ days.



          If the leap year concept is taken into consideration, the calculation might change a bit. But the process is the same as described above.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            How would you do this with equations? Say if there was a problem with many years and not dealing with just integers.
            $endgroup$
            – Chan C
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:20










          • $begingroup$
            Also some months have 31 days vs 30.
            $endgroup$
            – Chan C
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:23










          • $begingroup$
            Why will the $2$ month$- 25$ day period be served completely? Shouldn't it be $3$ years, $9$ months, $5$ days of service?
            $endgroup$
            – Shubham Johri
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:23












          • $begingroup$
            @ShubhamJohri You are correct. The time of service will be what you say
            $endgroup$
            – Aniruddha Deshmukh
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:45






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Of course! But then the total reduction will not cause decrease in the number of months. Only decrease in number of days. So, I did it in my mind and did not write it here which is why I made a mistake while writing. I am correcting it now.
            $endgroup$
            – Aniruddha Deshmukh
            Dec 10 '18 at 5:48
















          3












          $begingroup$

          Observe that after 36 months, that is 3 years, 360 days are taken off the $5$ year contract. Now, after 3 years, the contract remains of $4$ years and 5 days, which means $12$ months and $5$ days more to go. But for every month, $10$ days get cut off from the contract. So, after $1$st month, the contractual time remaining is $10$ months $25$ days. After $2$nd month, we are left with $9$ months $15$ days. After the $3$rd, we are left with $8$ months $5$ days. After the $4$th, we are left with $6$ months $25$ days. After the $5$th month, time left would be $5$ months $15$ days. After $6$th month, we have $4$ months $5$ days. After $7$th month, we are left with $2$ months $25$ days which will be served completely.



          Hence, the total time of service would be $3$ years, $9$ months and $5$ days.



          If the leap year concept is taken into consideration, the calculation might change a bit. But the process is the same as described above.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            How would you do this with equations? Say if there was a problem with many years and not dealing with just integers.
            $endgroup$
            – Chan C
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:20










          • $begingroup$
            Also some months have 31 days vs 30.
            $endgroup$
            – Chan C
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:23










          • $begingroup$
            Why will the $2$ month$- 25$ day period be served completely? Shouldn't it be $3$ years, $9$ months, $5$ days of service?
            $endgroup$
            – Shubham Johri
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:23












          • $begingroup$
            @ShubhamJohri You are correct. The time of service will be what you say
            $endgroup$
            – Aniruddha Deshmukh
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:45






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Of course! But then the total reduction will not cause decrease in the number of months. Only decrease in number of days. So, I did it in my mind and did not write it here which is why I made a mistake while writing. I am correcting it now.
            $endgroup$
            – Aniruddha Deshmukh
            Dec 10 '18 at 5:48














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Observe that after 36 months, that is 3 years, 360 days are taken off the $5$ year contract. Now, after 3 years, the contract remains of $4$ years and 5 days, which means $12$ months and $5$ days more to go. But for every month, $10$ days get cut off from the contract. So, after $1$st month, the contractual time remaining is $10$ months $25$ days. After $2$nd month, we are left with $9$ months $15$ days. After the $3$rd, we are left with $8$ months $5$ days. After the $4$th, we are left with $6$ months $25$ days. After the $5$th month, time left would be $5$ months $15$ days. After $6$th month, we have $4$ months $5$ days. After $7$th month, we are left with $2$ months $25$ days which will be served completely.



          Hence, the total time of service would be $3$ years, $9$ months and $5$ days.



          If the leap year concept is taken into consideration, the calculation might change a bit. But the process is the same as described above.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Observe that after 36 months, that is 3 years, 360 days are taken off the $5$ year contract. Now, after 3 years, the contract remains of $4$ years and 5 days, which means $12$ months and $5$ days more to go. But for every month, $10$ days get cut off from the contract. So, after $1$st month, the contractual time remaining is $10$ months $25$ days. After $2$nd month, we are left with $9$ months $15$ days. After the $3$rd, we are left with $8$ months $5$ days. After the $4$th, we are left with $6$ months $25$ days. After the $5$th month, time left would be $5$ months $15$ days. After $6$th month, we have $4$ months $5$ days. After $7$th month, we are left with $2$ months $25$ days which will be served completely.



          Hence, the total time of service would be $3$ years, $9$ months and $5$ days.



          If the leap year concept is taken into consideration, the calculation might change a bit. But the process is the same as described above.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 10 '18 at 5:49

























          answered Dec 9 '18 at 7:18









          Aniruddha DeshmukhAniruddha Deshmukh

          934418




          934418








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            How would you do this with equations? Say if there was a problem with many years and not dealing with just integers.
            $endgroup$
            – Chan C
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:20










          • $begingroup$
            Also some months have 31 days vs 30.
            $endgroup$
            – Chan C
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:23










          • $begingroup$
            Why will the $2$ month$- 25$ day period be served completely? Shouldn't it be $3$ years, $9$ months, $5$ days of service?
            $endgroup$
            – Shubham Johri
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:23












          • $begingroup$
            @ShubhamJohri You are correct. The time of service will be what you say
            $endgroup$
            – Aniruddha Deshmukh
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:45






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Of course! But then the total reduction will not cause decrease in the number of months. Only decrease in number of days. So, I did it in my mind and did not write it here which is why I made a mistake while writing. I am correcting it now.
            $endgroup$
            – Aniruddha Deshmukh
            Dec 10 '18 at 5:48














          • 1




            $begingroup$
            How would you do this with equations? Say if there was a problem with many years and not dealing with just integers.
            $endgroup$
            – Chan C
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:20










          • $begingroup$
            Also some months have 31 days vs 30.
            $endgroup$
            – Chan C
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:23










          • $begingroup$
            Why will the $2$ month$- 25$ day period be served completely? Shouldn't it be $3$ years, $9$ months, $5$ days of service?
            $endgroup$
            – Shubham Johri
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:23












          • $begingroup$
            @ShubhamJohri You are correct. The time of service will be what you say
            $endgroup$
            – Aniruddha Deshmukh
            Dec 9 '18 at 7:45






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Of course! But then the total reduction will not cause decrease in the number of months. Only decrease in number of days. So, I did it in my mind and did not write it here which is why I made a mistake while writing. I am correcting it now.
            $endgroup$
            – Aniruddha Deshmukh
            Dec 10 '18 at 5:48








          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          How would you do this with equations? Say if there was a problem with many years and not dealing with just integers.
          $endgroup$
          – Chan C
          Dec 9 '18 at 7:20




          $begingroup$
          How would you do this with equations? Say if there was a problem with many years and not dealing with just integers.
          $endgroup$
          – Chan C
          Dec 9 '18 at 7:20












          $begingroup$
          Also some months have 31 days vs 30.
          $endgroup$
          – Chan C
          Dec 9 '18 at 7:23




          $begingroup$
          Also some months have 31 days vs 30.
          $endgroup$
          – Chan C
          Dec 9 '18 at 7:23












          $begingroup$
          Why will the $2$ month$- 25$ day period be served completely? Shouldn't it be $3$ years, $9$ months, $5$ days of service?
          $endgroup$
          – Shubham Johri
          Dec 9 '18 at 7:23






          $begingroup$
          Why will the $2$ month$- 25$ day period be served completely? Shouldn't it be $3$ years, $9$ months, $5$ days of service?
          $endgroup$
          – Shubham Johri
          Dec 9 '18 at 7:23














          $begingroup$
          @ShubhamJohri You are correct. The time of service will be what you say
          $endgroup$
          – Aniruddha Deshmukh
          Dec 9 '18 at 7:45




          $begingroup$
          @ShubhamJohri You are correct. The time of service will be what you say
          $endgroup$
          – Aniruddha Deshmukh
          Dec 9 '18 at 7:45




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Of course! But then the total reduction will not cause decrease in the number of months. Only decrease in number of days. So, I did it in my mind and did not write it here which is why I made a mistake while writing. I am correcting it now.
          $endgroup$
          – Aniruddha Deshmukh
          Dec 10 '18 at 5:48




          $begingroup$
          Of course! But then the total reduction will not cause decrease in the number of months. Only decrease in number of days. So, I did it in my mind and did not write it here which is why I made a mistake while writing. I am correcting it now.
          $endgroup$
          – Aniruddha Deshmukh
          Dec 10 '18 at 5:48











          2












          $begingroup$

          To do this with equations, measure the time in days, and ignore leap years for now. There are 365 days in a year and 12 months, so every $frac {365}{12}$ days, they earn $10$ days credit. Let $d$ be the number of days that they actually serve. Then they earn $$frac {10}{frac {365}{12}}d = frac{120}{365}d$$days of credit total.



          The actual days on duty plus the credited days will add up to the full 5 years of service:



          $$d + frac{120}{365}d = 5times 365\d= frac{5cdot 365}{frac{485}{365}} = 1373.5 text{ days}$$
          which rounds up to 1374 days, or 3 years, 9 months, 5 days.



          But of course, somewhere in the 5 year term, we are going to have a leap year day. Possibly two, but likely just one. So the calculation is one or two days short. Thus the actual duty would be 3 years, 9 months, 6 days (or 7 days).



          Note that this "solution by equation" makes a number of simplifying assumptions. The credit days accrue steadily, instead of in 10-day lumps at the beginning of each month. The months are all of even length, just under 30.5 days.



          The equation method only estimates the complexity of the real situation, and thus, its result is less accurate. In order to model the situation more accuratebrly, you need to break it down into details, as Aniruddha Deshmukh has done. Even that solution is only approximate, as an exact calculation would require more information than is given in the question:




          • On what year, month and day does the tour of duty start? (The year is only needed to figure out where the leap year days fall.)

          • How exactly are the credit days awarded? (For example, on the first day of the following month? Or maybe a month later, or possibly continuously as my equation calculates.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            When Aniruddha stopped at month 7 " After 7th month, we are left with 2 months 25 days which will be served completely." couldn't he of went on for 1 more period or 2 depending on which day the 10 day reduction happens on. In that case it would match the equation model that you did. I don't understand why he stopped on month 7. Thanks I appreciate your help.
            $endgroup$
            – Chan C
            Dec 10 '18 at 1:57






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @ChanC - I hadn't double-checked Aniruddha's numbers, so I didn't notice the error. I was just aware of the extra error in setting it up as I had, and assumed that accounted for the difference. I've adjusted my remarks now. But the warning about the innaccuracies of this method still holds.
            $endgroup$
            – Paul Sinclair
            Dec 10 '18 at 23:46
















          2












          $begingroup$

          To do this with equations, measure the time in days, and ignore leap years for now. There are 365 days in a year and 12 months, so every $frac {365}{12}$ days, they earn $10$ days credit. Let $d$ be the number of days that they actually serve. Then they earn $$frac {10}{frac {365}{12}}d = frac{120}{365}d$$days of credit total.



          The actual days on duty plus the credited days will add up to the full 5 years of service:



          $$d + frac{120}{365}d = 5times 365\d= frac{5cdot 365}{frac{485}{365}} = 1373.5 text{ days}$$
          which rounds up to 1374 days, or 3 years, 9 months, 5 days.



          But of course, somewhere in the 5 year term, we are going to have a leap year day. Possibly two, but likely just one. So the calculation is one or two days short. Thus the actual duty would be 3 years, 9 months, 6 days (or 7 days).



          Note that this "solution by equation" makes a number of simplifying assumptions. The credit days accrue steadily, instead of in 10-day lumps at the beginning of each month. The months are all of even length, just under 30.5 days.



          The equation method only estimates the complexity of the real situation, and thus, its result is less accurate. In order to model the situation more accuratebrly, you need to break it down into details, as Aniruddha Deshmukh has done. Even that solution is only approximate, as an exact calculation would require more information than is given in the question:




          • On what year, month and day does the tour of duty start? (The year is only needed to figure out where the leap year days fall.)

          • How exactly are the credit days awarded? (For example, on the first day of the following month? Or maybe a month later, or possibly continuously as my equation calculates.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            When Aniruddha stopped at month 7 " After 7th month, we are left with 2 months 25 days which will be served completely." couldn't he of went on for 1 more period or 2 depending on which day the 10 day reduction happens on. In that case it would match the equation model that you did. I don't understand why he stopped on month 7. Thanks I appreciate your help.
            $endgroup$
            – Chan C
            Dec 10 '18 at 1:57






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @ChanC - I hadn't double-checked Aniruddha's numbers, so I didn't notice the error. I was just aware of the extra error in setting it up as I had, and assumed that accounted for the difference. I've adjusted my remarks now. But the warning about the innaccuracies of this method still holds.
            $endgroup$
            – Paul Sinclair
            Dec 10 '18 at 23:46














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          To do this with equations, measure the time in days, and ignore leap years for now. There are 365 days in a year and 12 months, so every $frac {365}{12}$ days, they earn $10$ days credit. Let $d$ be the number of days that they actually serve. Then they earn $$frac {10}{frac {365}{12}}d = frac{120}{365}d$$days of credit total.



          The actual days on duty plus the credited days will add up to the full 5 years of service:



          $$d + frac{120}{365}d = 5times 365\d= frac{5cdot 365}{frac{485}{365}} = 1373.5 text{ days}$$
          which rounds up to 1374 days, or 3 years, 9 months, 5 days.



          But of course, somewhere in the 5 year term, we are going to have a leap year day. Possibly two, but likely just one. So the calculation is one or two days short. Thus the actual duty would be 3 years, 9 months, 6 days (or 7 days).



          Note that this "solution by equation" makes a number of simplifying assumptions. The credit days accrue steadily, instead of in 10-day lumps at the beginning of each month. The months are all of even length, just under 30.5 days.



          The equation method only estimates the complexity of the real situation, and thus, its result is less accurate. In order to model the situation more accuratebrly, you need to break it down into details, as Aniruddha Deshmukh has done. Even that solution is only approximate, as an exact calculation would require more information than is given in the question:




          • On what year, month and day does the tour of duty start? (The year is only needed to figure out where the leap year days fall.)

          • How exactly are the credit days awarded? (For example, on the first day of the following month? Or maybe a month later, or possibly continuously as my equation calculates.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          To do this with equations, measure the time in days, and ignore leap years for now. There are 365 days in a year and 12 months, so every $frac {365}{12}$ days, they earn $10$ days credit. Let $d$ be the number of days that they actually serve. Then they earn $$frac {10}{frac {365}{12}}d = frac{120}{365}d$$days of credit total.



          The actual days on duty plus the credited days will add up to the full 5 years of service:



          $$d + frac{120}{365}d = 5times 365\d= frac{5cdot 365}{frac{485}{365}} = 1373.5 text{ days}$$
          which rounds up to 1374 days, or 3 years, 9 months, 5 days.



          But of course, somewhere in the 5 year term, we are going to have a leap year day. Possibly two, but likely just one. So the calculation is one or two days short. Thus the actual duty would be 3 years, 9 months, 6 days (or 7 days).



          Note that this "solution by equation" makes a number of simplifying assumptions. The credit days accrue steadily, instead of in 10-day lumps at the beginning of each month. The months are all of even length, just under 30.5 days.



          The equation method only estimates the complexity of the real situation, and thus, its result is less accurate. In order to model the situation more accuratebrly, you need to break it down into details, as Aniruddha Deshmukh has done. Even that solution is only approximate, as an exact calculation would require more information than is given in the question:




          • On what year, month and day does the tour of duty start? (The year is only needed to figure out where the leap year days fall.)

          • How exactly are the credit days awarded? (For example, on the first day of the following month? Or maybe a month later, or possibly continuously as my equation calculates.)







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 10 '18 at 23:44

























          answered Dec 9 '18 at 16:48









          Paul SinclairPaul Sinclair

          19.7k21442




          19.7k21442












          • $begingroup$
            When Aniruddha stopped at month 7 " After 7th month, we are left with 2 months 25 days which will be served completely." couldn't he of went on for 1 more period or 2 depending on which day the 10 day reduction happens on. In that case it would match the equation model that you did. I don't understand why he stopped on month 7. Thanks I appreciate your help.
            $endgroup$
            – Chan C
            Dec 10 '18 at 1:57






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @ChanC - I hadn't double-checked Aniruddha's numbers, so I didn't notice the error. I was just aware of the extra error in setting it up as I had, and assumed that accounted for the difference. I've adjusted my remarks now. But the warning about the innaccuracies of this method still holds.
            $endgroup$
            – Paul Sinclair
            Dec 10 '18 at 23:46


















          • $begingroup$
            When Aniruddha stopped at month 7 " After 7th month, we are left with 2 months 25 days which will be served completely." couldn't he of went on for 1 more period or 2 depending on which day the 10 day reduction happens on. In that case it would match the equation model that you did. I don't understand why he stopped on month 7. Thanks I appreciate your help.
            $endgroup$
            – Chan C
            Dec 10 '18 at 1:57






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @ChanC - I hadn't double-checked Aniruddha's numbers, so I didn't notice the error. I was just aware of the extra error in setting it up as I had, and assumed that accounted for the difference. I've adjusted my remarks now. But the warning about the innaccuracies of this method still holds.
            $endgroup$
            – Paul Sinclair
            Dec 10 '18 at 23:46
















          $begingroup$
          When Aniruddha stopped at month 7 " After 7th month, we are left with 2 months 25 days which will be served completely." couldn't he of went on for 1 more period or 2 depending on which day the 10 day reduction happens on. In that case it would match the equation model that you did. I don't understand why he stopped on month 7. Thanks I appreciate your help.
          $endgroup$
          – Chan C
          Dec 10 '18 at 1:57




          $begingroup$
          When Aniruddha stopped at month 7 " After 7th month, we are left with 2 months 25 days which will be served completely." couldn't he of went on for 1 more period or 2 depending on which day the 10 day reduction happens on. In that case it would match the equation model that you did. I don't understand why he stopped on month 7. Thanks I appreciate your help.
          $endgroup$
          – Chan C
          Dec 10 '18 at 1:57




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @ChanC - I hadn't double-checked Aniruddha's numbers, so I didn't notice the error. I was just aware of the extra error in setting it up as I had, and assumed that accounted for the difference. I've adjusted my remarks now. But the warning about the innaccuracies of this method still holds.
          $endgroup$
          – Paul Sinclair
          Dec 10 '18 at 23:46




          $begingroup$
          @ChanC - I hadn't double-checked Aniruddha's numbers, so I didn't notice the error. I was just aware of the extra error in setting it up as I had, and assumed that accounted for the difference. I've adjusted my remarks now. But the warning about the innaccuracies of this method still holds.
          $endgroup$
          – Paul Sinclair
          Dec 10 '18 at 23:46


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032101%2fword-problem-about-a-diminishing-military-contract%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Verónica Boquete

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten