Example of GCD in UFD that can't be expressed as linear combination












6












$begingroup$


I proved that any two elements in PID have GCD and it can be expressed as linear combination of those two elements.
I know that even in case of UFD GCD exists but it may not be expressed as linear combination. Can anyone give me an example for which GCD is not expressed as linear combination?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    6












    $begingroup$


    I proved that any two elements in PID have GCD and it can be expressed as linear combination of those two elements.
    I know that even in case of UFD GCD exists but it may not be expressed as linear combination. Can anyone give me an example for which GCD is not expressed as linear combination?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      6












      6








      6


      6



      $begingroup$


      I proved that any two elements in PID have GCD and it can be expressed as linear combination of those two elements.
      I know that even in case of UFD GCD exists but it may not be expressed as linear combination. Can anyone give me an example for which GCD is not expressed as linear combination?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I proved that any two elements in PID have GCD and it can be expressed as linear combination of those two elements.
      I know that even in case of UFD GCD exists but it may not be expressed as linear combination. Can anyone give me an example for which GCD is not expressed as linear combination?







      number-theory ring-theory greatest-common-divisor integral-domain unique-factorization-domains






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 15 '18 at 7:46









      qwr

      6,70342755




      6,70342755










      asked Apr 3 '16 at 6:03









      user298543user298543

      413




      413






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          10












          $begingroup$

          It is true that in any UFD, any two elements have a GCD (this comes right away from the definition), but the Bezout property (i.e. such a GCD is a linear combination) does not hold in general. Counter-example: in the polynomial ring $mathbb{Z}[t]$, $2$ and $t$ are coprime, but the ideal $(2,t)$ is strictly contained in the whole ring, whereas it should be equal to it if Bezout were available.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            To clarify: the GCD of $2$ and $t$ is $1$, and the ideal $(1)$ is the entire ring.
            $endgroup$
            – qwr
            Dec 15 '18 at 7:49



















          7












          $begingroup$

          Let's consider $R[x,y]$. The GCD of $x^2y$ and $xy^2$ is $xy$ so we are looking for $a,bin R[x,y]$ such that $ax^2y+bxy^2=xyRightarrow ax+by=1$. But the constant term of both $ax$ and $by$ is $0$, so the constant term of their sum is also zero. Contradiction.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            First we have the result that $mathbb Z$ is a UFD implies $mathbb Z[x, y, z]$ is a UFD.



            $operatorname{gcd}(xy, xz) = x$ but $x$ cannot be written as a linear combination of $xy$ and $xz$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$





















              1












              $begingroup$

              In $ℚ[X,Y]$ we have $gcd (X,Y) = 1$, but $1 ≠ fX + gY$ for any $f, g ∈ ℚ[X,Y]$ and both of these assertions can be seen by looking at degrees in $X$ and $Y$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                });
                });
                }, "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1725612%2fexample-of-gcd-in-ufd-that-cant-be-expressed-as-linear-combination%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes








                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                10












                $begingroup$

                It is true that in any UFD, any two elements have a GCD (this comes right away from the definition), but the Bezout property (i.e. such a GCD is a linear combination) does not hold in general. Counter-example: in the polynomial ring $mathbb{Z}[t]$, $2$ and $t$ are coprime, but the ideal $(2,t)$ is strictly contained in the whole ring, whereas it should be equal to it if Bezout were available.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  To clarify: the GCD of $2$ and $t$ is $1$, and the ideal $(1)$ is the entire ring.
                  $endgroup$
                  – qwr
                  Dec 15 '18 at 7:49
















                10












                $begingroup$

                It is true that in any UFD, any two elements have a GCD (this comes right away from the definition), but the Bezout property (i.e. such a GCD is a linear combination) does not hold in general. Counter-example: in the polynomial ring $mathbb{Z}[t]$, $2$ and $t$ are coprime, but the ideal $(2,t)$ is strictly contained in the whole ring, whereas it should be equal to it if Bezout were available.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  To clarify: the GCD of $2$ and $t$ is $1$, and the ideal $(1)$ is the entire ring.
                  $endgroup$
                  – qwr
                  Dec 15 '18 at 7:49














                10












                10








                10





                $begingroup$

                It is true that in any UFD, any two elements have a GCD (this comes right away from the definition), but the Bezout property (i.e. such a GCD is a linear combination) does not hold in general. Counter-example: in the polynomial ring $mathbb{Z}[t]$, $2$ and $t$ are coprime, but the ideal $(2,t)$ is strictly contained in the whole ring, whereas it should be equal to it if Bezout were available.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                It is true that in any UFD, any two elements have a GCD (this comes right away from the definition), but the Bezout property (i.e. such a GCD is a linear combination) does not hold in general. Counter-example: in the polynomial ring $mathbb{Z}[t]$, $2$ and $t$ are coprime, but the ideal $(2,t)$ is strictly contained in the whole ring, whereas it should be equal to it if Bezout were available.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Feb 28 '17 at 14:37









                Andreas Caranti

                56.6k34395




                56.6k34395










                answered Apr 4 '16 at 8:34









                nguyen quang donguyen quang do

                8,9891724




                8,9891724












                • $begingroup$
                  To clarify: the GCD of $2$ and $t$ is $1$, and the ideal $(1)$ is the entire ring.
                  $endgroup$
                  – qwr
                  Dec 15 '18 at 7:49


















                • $begingroup$
                  To clarify: the GCD of $2$ and $t$ is $1$, and the ideal $(1)$ is the entire ring.
                  $endgroup$
                  – qwr
                  Dec 15 '18 at 7:49
















                $begingroup$
                To clarify: the GCD of $2$ and $t$ is $1$, and the ideal $(1)$ is the entire ring.
                $endgroup$
                – qwr
                Dec 15 '18 at 7:49




                $begingroup$
                To clarify: the GCD of $2$ and $t$ is $1$, and the ideal $(1)$ is the entire ring.
                $endgroup$
                – qwr
                Dec 15 '18 at 7:49











                7












                $begingroup$

                Let's consider $R[x,y]$. The GCD of $x^2y$ and $xy^2$ is $xy$ so we are looking for $a,bin R[x,y]$ such that $ax^2y+bxy^2=xyRightarrow ax+by=1$. But the constant term of both $ax$ and $by$ is $0$, so the constant term of their sum is also zero. Contradiction.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$


















                  7












                  $begingroup$

                  Let's consider $R[x,y]$. The GCD of $x^2y$ and $xy^2$ is $xy$ so we are looking for $a,bin R[x,y]$ such that $ax^2y+bxy^2=xyRightarrow ax+by=1$. But the constant term of both $ax$ and $by$ is $0$, so the constant term of their sum is also zero. Contradiction.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$
















                    7












                    7








                    7





                    $begingroup$

                    Let's consider $R[x,y]$. The GCD of $x^2y$ and $xy^2$ is $xy$ so we are looking for $a,bin R[x,y]$ such that $ax^2y+bxy^2=xyRightarrow ax+by=1$. But the constant term of both $ax$ and $by$ is $0$, so the constant term of their sum is also zero. Contradiction.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    Let's consider $R[x,y]$. The GCD of $x^2y$ and $xy^2$ is $xy$ so we are looking for $a,bin R[x,y]$ such that $ax^2y+bxy^2=xyRightarrow ax+by=1$. But the constant term of both $ax$ and $by$ is $0$, so the constant term of their sum is also zero. Contradiction.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Feb 28 '17 at 14:31

























                    answered Apr 3 '16 at 6:19









                    Stella BidermanStella Biderman

                    26.7k63375




                    26.7k63375























                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        First we have the result that $mathbb Z$ is a UFD implies $mathbb Z[x, y, z]$ is a UFD.



                        $operatorname{gcd}(xy, xz) = x$ but $x$ cannot be written as a linear combination of $xy$ and $xz$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          First we have the result that $mathbb Z$ is a UFD implies $mathbb Z[x, y, z]$ is a UFD.



                          $operatorname{gcd}(xy, xz) = x$ but $x$ cannot be written as a linear combination of $xy$ and $xz$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            First we have the result that $mathbb Z$ is a UFD implies $mathbb Z[x, y, z]$ is a UFD.



                            $operatorname{gcd}(xy, xz) = x$ but $x$ cannot be written as a linear combination of $xy$ and $xz$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            First we have the result that $mathbb Z$ is a UFD implies $mathbb Z[x, y, z]$ is a UFD.



                            $operatorname{gcd}(xy, xz) = x$ but $x$ cannot be written as a linear combination of $xy$ and $xz$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Dec 5 '18 at 17:48









                            qwrqwr

                            6,70342755




                            6,70342755























                                1












                                $begingroup$

                                In $ℚ[X,Y]$ we have $gcd (X,Y) = 1$, but $1 ≠ fX + gY$ for any $f, g ∈ ℚ[X,Y]$ and both of these assertions can be seen by looking at degrees in $X$ and $Y$.






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$


















                                  1












                                  $begingroup$

                                  In $ℚ[X,Y]$ we have $gcd (X,Y) = 1$, but $1 ≠ fX + gY$ for any $f, g ∈ ℚ[X,Y]$ and both of these assertions can be seen by looking at degrees in $X$ and $Y$.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$
















                                    1












                                    1








                                    1





                                    $begingroup$

                                    In $ℚ[X,Y]$ we have $gcd (X,Y) = 1$, but $1 ≠ fX + gY$ for any $f, g ∈ ℚ[X,Y]$ and both of these assertions can be seen by looking at degrees in $X$ and $Y$.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    In $ℚ[X,Y]$ we have $gcd (X,Y) = 1$, but $1 ≠ fX + gY$ for any $f, g ∈ ℚ[X,Y]$ and both of these assertions can be seen by looking at degrees in $X$ and $Y$.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered Feb 13 at 7:59









                                    k.stmk.stm

                                    10.9k22250




                                    10.9k22250






























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1725612%2fexample-of-gcd-in-ufd-that-cant-be-expressed-as-linear-combination%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Bundesstraße 106

                                        Verónica Boquete

                                        Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten