Given $f(x)$ is integrable on $[0, 1]$ and $0 < f(x) < 1$, prove that $int_{0}^{1} (f(x))^{n}...












4












$begingroup$



Given $f(x)$ is integrable on $[0, 1]$ and $0 < f(x) < 1$, prove that
$int_{0}^{1} (f(x))^{n} mathop{dx}$ converges to $0$.




I understand why the statement is true intuitively because as $n to infty$, since $f$ lies between $0$ and $1$, it will be like a fractional value, which converges to $0$ since the fractions get smaller and smaller.



However, I am not sure about how to prove this rigorously.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What does "integrable" mean? Riemann or Lebesgue?
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:33










  • $begingroup$
    Riemann integrability
    $endgroup$
    – joseph
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    So you don't know the dominated convergence theorem?
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:35










  • $begingroup$
    I don't know it
    $endgroup$
    – joseph
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:38










  • $begingroup$
    Without dominated convergence it appears a bit difficult. The sequence of integrals is decreasing and positive so the limit exists. We need some sort of contradiction to prove that the limit can't be positive.
    $endgroup$
    – Paramanand Singh
    Dec 14 '18 at 3:06
















4












$begingroup$



Given $f(x)$ is integrable on $[0, 1]$ and $0 < f(x) < 1$, prove that
$int_{0}^{1} (f(x))^{n} mathop{dx}$ converges to $0$.




I understand why the statement is true intuitively because as $n to infty$, since $f$ lies between $0$ and $1$, it will be like a fractional value, which converges to $0$ since the fractions get smaller and smaller.



However, I am not sure about how to prove this rigorously.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What does "integrable" mean? Riemann or Lebesgue?
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:33










  • $begingroup$
    Riemann integrability
    $endgroup$
    – joseph
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    So you don't know the dominated convergence theorem?
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:35










  • $begingroup$
    I don't know it
    $endgroup$
    – joseph
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:38










  • $begingroup$
    Without dominated convergence it appears a bit difficult. The sequence of integrals is decreasing and positive so the limit exists. We need some sort of contradiction to prove that the limit can't be positive.
    $endgroup$
    – Paramanand Singh
    Dec 14 '18 at 3:06














4












4








4


1



$begingroup$



Given $f(x)$ is integrable on $[0, 1]$ and $0 < f(x) < 1$, prove that
$int_{0}^{1} (f(x))^{n} mathop{dx}$ converges to $0$.




I understand why the statement is true intuitively because as $n to infty$, since $f$ lies between $0$ and $1$, it will be like a fractional value, which converges to $0$ since the fractions get smaller and smaller.



However, I am not sure about how to prove this rigorously.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Given $f(x)$ is integrable on $[0, 1]$ and $0 < f(x) < 1$, prove that
$int_{0}^{1} (f(x))^{n} mathop{dx}$ converges to $0$.




I understand why the statement is true intuitively because as $n to infty$, since $f$ lies between $0$ and $1$, it will be like a fractional value, which converges to $0$ since the fractions get smaller and smaller.



However, I am not sure about how to prove this rigorously.







real-analysis integration limits convergence riemann-integration






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 14 '18 at 4:06









David G. Stork

11k41432




11k41432










asked Dec 14 '18 at 2:26









josephjoseph

496111




496111












  • $begingroup$
    What does "integrable" mean? Riemann or Lebesgue?
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:33










  • $begingroup$
    Riemann integrability
    $endgroup$
    – joseph
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    So you don't know the dominated convergence theorem?
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:35










  • $begingroup$
    I don't know it
    $endgroup$
    – joseph
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:38










  • $begingroup$
    Without dominated convergence it appears a bit difficult. The sequence of integrals is decreasing and positive so the limit exists. We need some sort of contradiction to prove that the limit can't be positive.
    $endgroup$
    – Paramanand Singh
    Dec 14 '18 at 3:06


















  • $begingroup$
    What does "integrable" mean? Riemann or Lebesgue?
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:33










  • $begingroup$
    Riemann integrability
    $endgroup$
    – joseph
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    So you don't know the dominated convergence theorem?
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:35










  • $begingroup$
    I don't know it
    $endgroup$
    – joseph
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:38










  • $begingroup$
    Without dominated convergence it appears a bit difficult. The sequence of integrals is decreasing and positive so the limit exists. We need some sort of contradiction to prove that the limit can't be positive.
    $endgroup$
    – Paramanand Singh
    Dec 14 '18 at 3:06
















$begingroup$
What does "integrable" mean? Riemann or Lebesgue?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:33




$begingroup$
What does "integrable" mean? Riemann or Lebesgue?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:33












$begingroup$
Riemann integrability
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 2:34




$begingroup$
Riemann integrability
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 2:34




1




1




$begingroup$
So you don't know the dominated convergence theorem?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:35




$begingroup$
So you don't know the dominated convergence theorem?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:35












$begingroup$
I don't know it
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 2:38




$begingroup$
I don't know it
$endgroup$
– joseph
Dec 14 '18 at 2:38












$begingroup$
Without dominated convergence it appears a bit difficult. The sequence of integrals is decreasing and positive so the limit exists. We need some sort of contradiction to prove that the limit can't be positive.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Dec 14 '18 at 3:06




$begingroup$
Without dominated convergence it appears a bit difficult. The sequence of integrals is decreasing and positive so the limit exists. We need some sort of contradiction to prove that the limit can't be positive.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Dec 14 '18 at 3:06










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Here is a proof which assumes some amount of measure theory (and I think this is unavoidable, but I may be wrong in thinking so).



Let $f_n(x) =(f(x)) ^n $ then each $f_n(x) $ is Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$ and hence the set $D_n$ of its discontinuities is of measure $0$ and thus the set $D=bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty}D_n$ is of measure $0$. Let $epsilon>0$ be given. Then there is a sequence of open intervals ${J_n}$ such that $Dsubseteq bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty} J_n$ and the length of these intervals $J_n$ combined is less than $epsilon$.



Next $f_n(x) to 0$ as $ntoinfty $ for all $xin[0,1]$. Let $xin[0,1]setminus D$. Then we have a positive integer $n_x$ depending on $x$ such that $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq n_x$. By continuity of $f_{n_x}$ at $x$ it follows that there is a neighborhood $I_x$ such that $f_{n_x} (x) <epsilon $ for all $xin I_x$. Since $f_n$ is decreasing it follows that we have $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $xin I_x$ and all $ngeq n_x$.



Now the set of all neighborhoods $I_x$ as $x$ varies in $[0,1]setminus D$ together with the intervals $J_n$ forms an open cover for $[0,1]$ and thus by Heine Borel theorem a finite number of these intervals covers $[0,1]$. Thus we have $$[0,1]subseteq bigcuplimits_{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} cupbigcuplimits_{i=1}^{q}J_i$$ Let $N$ be the maximum of integers $n_{x_1},n_{x_2},dots,n_{x_p}$ then we have $$f_n(x) <epsilon, forall xinbigcuplimits _{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} , forall ngeq N$$ The end points of $J_1,J_2,dots,J_q$ which lie in $[0,1]$ partition it into a finite number of subintervals. Denote the union of all those subintervals which contain points of $J_1,dots, J_q$ as $A$ and let the union of remaining subintervals be denoted by $B$. Then length of $A$ is less than $epsilon$ and $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq N$ and all $xin B$. Thus we have $$int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dx=int_{A}f_n(x),dx+int_{B}f_n(x),dx<epsilon +epsilon =2epsilon $$ for all $ngeq N$. Therefore $int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dxto 0$ as $nto infty $.





Note that the above argument actually proves the following result:




Theorem: Let ${f_n} $ be a sequence of functions $f_n:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ such that each $f_n$ is non-negative and Riemann integrable on $[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) geq f_{n+1}(x),forall xin[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) to 0$ point wise almost everywhere in $[a, b] $ then $int_{a} ^{b} f_n(x) , dxto 0$.







share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Very nice answer.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Dec 14 '18 at 7:36



















1












$begingroup$

You may use the following theorem due to Arzelà :---



Let ${f_n}$ be a sequence of Riemann integrable Functions on $[a,b]$ and converges point-wise to $f$, also there is a positive number $M$ such that $|f_n(x)|≤M,forall xin [a,b],forall nin Bbb N$. Now if $f$ is Riemann integrable over $[a,b]$ then , $$lim_{nrightarrow infty}int_a^bf_n(x)dx=int_a^blim_{nrightarrow infty} f_n(x)dx=int_a^b f(x) dx.$$




Here $f_n(x)=(f(x))^nrightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrow infty$ $,forall
xin [0,1]$
.







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    +1 Proving Arzela theorem is difficult. I hope the asker is allowed to use Arzela theorem for the practice exercise.
    $endgroup$
    – Paramanand Singh
    Dec 14 '18 at 5:23



















1












$begingroup$

Since $f$ is integrable, it is measurable. By Lusin's theorem, for any $varepsilon>0$ there exists a compact set $Ksubset [0,1]$ such that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $K$ and $|K|>1-varepsilon$. Uniform continuity implies that $sup_{xin K} f(x) = lambda<1$. Thus
$$begin{align}
int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx &= int_{K} f(x)^n, dx + int_{[0,1]backslash K} f(x)^n, dx \
&le |K|lambda^n + varepsiloncdot1.
end{align}$$

Take limit as $ntoinfty$ yields
$$
limsup_{nto infty} int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx le varepsilon.
$$

Since the above hold for any $varepsilon>0$, we have $int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dxto 0$ as wanted.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038847%2fgiven-fx-is-integrable-on-0-1-and-0-fx-1-prove-that-int-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    Here is a proof which assumes some amount of measure theory (and I think this is unavoidable, but I may be wrong in thinking so).



    Let $f_n(x) =(f(x)) ^n $ then each $f_n(x) $ is Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$ and hence the set $D_n$ of its discontinuities is of measure $0$ and thus the set $D=bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty}D_n$ is of measure $0$. Let $epsilon>0$ be given. Then there is a sequence of open intervals ${J_n}$ such that $Dsubseteq bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty} J_n$ and the length of these intervals $J_n$ combined is less than $epsilon$.



    Next $f_n(x) to 0$ as $ntoinfty $ for all $xin[0,1]$. Let $xin[0,1]setminus D$. Then we have a positive integer $n_x$ depending on $x$ such that $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq n_x$. By continuity of $f_{n_x}$ at $x$ it follows that there is a neighborhood $I_x$ such that $f_{n_x} (x) <epsilon $ for all $xin I_x$. Since $f_n$ is decreasing it follows that we have $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $xin I_x$ and all $ngeq n_x$.



    Now the set of all neighborhoods $I_x$ as $x$ varies in $[0,1]setminus D$ together with the intervals $J_n$ forms an open cover for $[0,1]$ and thus by Heine Borel theorem a finite number of these intervals covers $[0,1]$. Thus we have $$[0,1]subseteq bigcuplimits_{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} cupbigcuplimits_{i=1}^{q}J_i$$ Let $N$ be the maximum of integers $n_{x_1},n_{x_2},dots,n_{x_p}$ then we have $$f_n(x) <epsilon, forall xinbigcuplimits _{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} , forall ngeq N$$ The end points of $J_1,J_2,dots,J_q$ which lie in $[0,1]$ partition it into a finite number of subintervals. Denote the union of all those subintervals which contain points of $J_1,dots, J_q$ as $A$ and let the union of remaining subintervals be denoted by $B$. Then length of $A$ is less than $epsilon$ and $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq N$ and all $xin B$. Thus we have $$int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dx=int_{A}f_n(x),dx+int_{B}f_n(x),dx<epsilon +epsilon =2epsilon $$ for all $ngeq N$. Therefore $int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dxto 0$ as $nto infty $.





    Note that the above argument actually proves the following result:




    Theorem: Let ${f_n} $ be a sequence of functions $f_n:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ such that each $f_n$ is non-negative and Riemann integrable on $[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) geq f_{n+1}(x),forall xin[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) to 0$ point wise almost everywhere in $[a, b] $ then $int_{a} ^{b} f_n(x) , dxto 0$.







    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Very nice answer.
      $endgroup$
      – RRL
      Dec 14 '18 at 7:36
















    6












    $begingroup$

    Here is a proof which assumes some amount of measure theory (and I think this is unavoidable, but I may be wrong in thinking so).



    Let $f_n(x) =(f(x)) ^n $ then each $f_n(x) $ is Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$ and hence the set $D_n$ of its discontinuities is of measure $0$ and thus the set $D=bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty}D_n$ is of measure $0$. Let $epsilon>0$ be given. Then there is a sequence of open intervals ${J_n}$ such that $Dsubseteq bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty} J_n$ and the length of these intervals $J_n$ combined is less than $epsilon$.



    Next $f_n(x) to 0$ as $ntoinfty $ for all $xin[0,1]$. Let $xin[0,1]setminus D$. Then we have a positive integer $n_x$ depending on $x$ such that $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq n_x$. By continuity of $f_{n_x}$ at $x$ it follows that there is a neighborhood $I_x$ such that $f_{n_x} (x) <epsilon $ for all $xin I_x$. Since $f_n$ is decreasing it follows that we have $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $xin I_x$ and all $ngeq n_x$.



    Now the set of all neighborhoods $I_x$ as $x$ varies in $[0,1]setminus D$ together with the intervals $J_n$ forms an open cover for $[0,1]$ and thus by Heine Borel theorem a finite number of these intervals covers $[0,1]$. Thus we have $$[0,1]subseteq bigcuplimits_{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} cupbigcuplimits_{i=1}^{q}J_i$$ Let $N$ be the maximum of integers $n_{x_1},n_{x_2},dots,n_{x_p}$ then we have $$f_n(x) <epsilon, forall xinbigcuplimits _{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} , forall ngeq N$$ The end points of $J_1,J_2,dots,J_q$ which lie in $[0,1]$ partition it into a finite number of subintervals. Denote the union of all those subintervals which contain points of $J_1,dots, J_q$ as $A$ and let the union of remaining subintervals be denoted by $B$. Then length of $A$ is less than $epsilon$ and $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq N$ and all $xin B$. Thus we have $$int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dx=int_{A}f_n(x),dx+int_{B}f_n(x),dx<epsilon +epsilon =2epsilon $$ for all $ngeq N$. Therefore $int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dxto 0$ as $nto infty $.





    Note that the above argument actually proves the following result:




    Theorem: Let ${f_n} $ be a sequence of functions $f_n:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ such that each $f_n$ is non-negative and Riemann integrable on $[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) geq f_{n+1}(x),forall xin[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) to 0$ point wise almost everywhere in $[a, b] $ then $int_{a} ^{b} f_n(x) , dxto 0$.







    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Very nice answer.
      $endgroup$
      – RRL
      Dec 14 '18 at 7:36














    6












    6








    6





    $begingroup$

    Here is a proof which assumes some amount of measure theory (and I think this is unavoidable, but I may be wrong in thinking so).



    Let $f_n(x) =(f(x)) ^n $ then each $f_n(x) $ is Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$ and hence the set $D_n$ of its discontinuities is of measure $0$ and thus the set $D=bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty}D_n$ is of measure $0$. Let $epsilon>0$ be given. Then there is a sequence of open intervals ${J_n}$ such that $Dsubseteq bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty} J_n$ and the length of these intervals $J_n$ combined is less than $epsilon$.



    Next $f_n(x) to 0$ as $ntoinfty $ for all $xin[0,1]$. Let $xin[0,1]setminus D$. Then we have a positive integer $n_x$ depending on $x$ such that $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq n_x$. By continuity of $f_{n_x}$ at $x$ it follows that there is a neighborhood $I_x$ such that $f_{n_x} (x) <epsilon $ for all $xin I_x$. Since $f_n$ is decreasing it follows that we have $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $xin I_x$ and all $ngeq n_x$.



    Now the set of all neighborhoods $I_x$ as $x$ varies in $[0,1]setminus D$ together with the intervals $J_n$ forms an open cover for $[0,1]$ and thus by Heine Borel theorem a finite number of these intervals covers $[0,1]$. Thus we have $$[0,1]subseteq bigcuplimits_{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} cupbigcuplimits_{i=1}^{q}J_i$$ Let $N$ be the maximum of integers $n_{x_1},n_{x_2},dots,n_{x_p}$ then we have $$f_n(x) <epsilon, forall xinbigcuplimits _{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} , forall ngeq N$$ The end points of $J_1,J_2,dots,J_q$ which lie in $[0,1]$ partition it into a finite number of subintervals. Denote the union of all those subintervals which contain points of $J_1,dots, J_q$ as $A$ and let the union of remaining subintervals be denoted by $B$. Then length of $A$ is less than $epsilon$ and $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq N$ and all $xin B$. Thus we have $$int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dx=int_{A}f_n(x),dx+int_{B}f_n(x),dx<epsilon +epsilon =2epsilon $$ for all $ngeq N$. Therefore $int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dxto 0$ as $nto infty $.





    Note that the above argument actually proves the following result:




    Theorem: Let ${f_n} $ be a sequence of functions $f_n:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ such that each $f_n$ is non-negative and Riemann integrable on $[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) geq f_{n+1}(x),forall xin[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) to 0$ point wise almost everywhere in $[a, b] $ then $int_{a} ^{b} f_n(x) , dxto 0$.







    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Here is a proof which assumes some amount of measure theory (and I think this is unavoidable, but I may be wrong in thinking so).



    Let $f_n(x) =(f(x)) ^n $ then each $f_n(x) $ is Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$ and hence the set $D_n$ of its discontinuities is of measure $0$ and thus the set $D=bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty}D_n$ is of measure $0$. Let $epsilon>0$ be given. Then there is a sequence of open intervals ${J_n}$ such that $Dsubseteq bigcuplimits_{n=1}^{infty} J_n$ and the length of these intervals $J_n$ combined is less than $epsilon$.



    Next $f_n(x) to 0$ as $ntoinfty $ for all $xin[0,1]$. Let $xin[0,1]setminus D$. Then we have a positive integer $n_x$ depending on $x$ such that $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq n_x$. By continuity of $f_{n_x}$ at $x$ it follows that there is a neighborhood $I_x$ such that $f_{n_x} (x) <epsilon $ for all $xin I_x$. Since $f_n$ is decreasing it follows that we have $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $xin I_x$ and all $ngeq n_x$.



    Now the set of all neighborhoods $I_x$ as $x$ varies in $[0,1]setminus D$ together with the intervals $J_n$ forms an open cover for $[0,1]$ and thus by Heine Borel theorem a finite number of these intervals covers $[0,1]$. Thus we have $$[0,1]subseteq bigcuplimits_{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} cupbigcuplimits_{i=1}^{q}J_i$$ Let $N$ be the maximum of integers $n_{x_1},n_{x_2},dots,n_{x_p}$ then we have $$f_n(x) <epsilon, forall xinbigcuplimits _{i=1}^{p}I_{x_i} , forall ngeq N$$ The end points of $J_1,J_2,dots,J_q$ which lie in $[0,1]$ partition it into a finite number of subintervals. Denote the union of all those subintervals which contain points of $J_1,dots, J_q$ as $A$ and let the union of remaining subintervals be denoted by $B$. Then length of $A$ is less than $epsilon$ and $f_n(x) <epsilon$ for all $ngeq N$ and all $xin B$. Thus we have $$int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dx=int_{A}f_n(x),dx+int_{B}f_n(x),dx<epsilon +epsilon =2epsilon $$ for all $ngeq N$. Therefore $int_{0}^{1}f_n(x),dxto 0$ as $nto infty $.





    Note that the above argument actually proves the following result:




    Theorem: Let ${f_n} $ be a sequence of functions $f_n:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ such that each $f_n$ is non-negative and Riemann integrable on $[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) geq f_{n+1}(x),forall xin[a, b] $ and $f_n(x) to 0$ point wise almost everywhere in $[a, b] $ then $int_{a} ^{b} f_n(x) , dxto 0$.








    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 18 '18 at 17:20

























    answered Dec 14 '18 at 4:02









    Paramanand SinghParamanand Singh

    50.4k556166




    50.4k556166












    • $begingroup$
      Very nice answer.
      $endgroup$
      – RRL
      Dec 14 '18 at 7:36


















    • $begingroup$
      Very nice answer.
      $endgroup$
      – RRL
      Dec 14 '18 at 7:36
















    $begingroup$
    Very nice answer.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Dec 14 '18 at 7:36




    $begingroup$
    Very nice answer.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Dec 14 '18 at 7:36











    1












    $begingroup$

    You may use the following theorem due to Arzelà :---



    Let ${f_n}$ be a sequence of Riemann integrable Functions on $[a,b]$ and converges point-wise to $f$, also there is a positive number $M$ such that $|f_n(x)|≤M,forall xin [a,b],forall nin Bbb N$. Now if $f$ is Riemann integrable over $[a,b]$ then , $$lim_{nrightarrow infty}int_a^bf_n(x)dx=int_a^blim_{nrightarrow infty} f_n(x)dx=int_a^b f(x) dx.$$




    Here $f_n(x)=(f(x))^nrightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrow infty$ $,forall
    xin [0,1]$
    .







    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      +1 Proving Arzela theorem is difficult. I hope the asker is allowed to use Arzela theorem for the practice exercise.
      $endgroup$
      – Paramanand Singh
      Dec 14 '18 at 5:23
















    1












    $begingroup$

    You may use the following theorem due to Arzelà :---



    Let ${f_n}$ be a sequence of Riemann integrable Functions on $[a,b]$ and converges point-wise to $f$, also there is a positive number $M$ such that $|f_n(x)|≤M,forall xin [a,b],forall nin Bbb N$. Now if $f$ is Riemann integrable over $[a,b]$ then , $$lim_{nrightarrow infty}int_a^bf_n(x)dx=int_a^blim_{nrightarrow infty} f_n(x)dx=int_a^b f(x) dx.$$




    Here $f_n(x)=(f(x))^nrightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrow infty$ $,forall
    xin [0,1]$
    .







    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      +1 Proving Arzela theorem is difficult. I hope the asker is allowed to use Arzela theorem for the practice exercise.
      $endgroup$
      – Paramanand Singh
      Dec 14 '18 at 5:23














    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    You may use the following theorem due to Arzelà :---



    Let ${f_n}$ be a sequence of Riemann integrable Functions on $[a,b]$ and converges point-wise to $f$, also there is a positive number $M$ such that $|f_n(x)|≤M,forall xin [a,b],forall nin Bbb N$. Now if $f$ is Riemann integrable over $[a,b]$ then , $$lim_{nrightarrow infty}int_a^bf_n(x)dx=int_a^blim_{nrightarrow infty} f_n(x)dx=int_a^b f(x) dx.$$




    Here $f_n(x)=(f(x))^nrightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrow infty$ $,forall
    xin [0,1]$
    .







    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    You may use the following theorem due to Arzelà :---



    Let ${f_n}$ be a sequence of Riemann integrable Functions on $[a,b]$ and converges point-wise to $f$, also there is a positive number $M$ such that $|f_n(x)|≤M,forall xin [a,b],forall nin Bbb N$. Now if $f$ is Riemann integrable over $[a,b]$ then , $$lim_{nrightarrow infty}int_a^bf_n(x)dx=int_a^blim_{nrightarrow infty} f_n(x)dx=int_a^b f(x) dx.$$




    Here $f_n(x)=(f(x))^nrightarrow 0$ as $nrightarrow infty$ $,forall
    xin [0,1]$
    .








    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Dec 14 '18 at 4:59









    UserSUserS

    1,5541112




    1,5541112












    • $begingroup$
      +1 Proving Arzela theorem is difficult. I hope the asker is allowed to use Arzela theorem for the practice exercise.
      $endgroup$
      – Paramanand Singh
      Dec 14 '18 at 5:23


















    • $begingroup$
      +1 Proving Arzela theorem is difficult. I hope the asker is allowed to use Arzela theorem for the practice exercise.
      $endgroup$
      – Paramanand Singh
      Dec 14 '18 at 5:23
















    $begingroup$
    +1 Proving Arzela theorem is difficult. I hope the asker is allowed to use Arzela theorem for the practice exercise.
    $endgroup$
    – Paramanand Singh
    Dec 14 '18 at 5:23




    $begingroup$
    +1 Proving Arzela theorem is difficult. I hope the asker is allowed to use Arzela theorem for the practice exercise.
    $endgroup$
    – Paramanand Singh
    Dec 14 '18 at 5:23











    1












    $begingroup$

    Since $f$ is integrable, it is measurable. By Lusin's theorem, for any $varepsilon>0$ there exists a compact set $Ksubset [0,1]$ such that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $K$ and $|K|>1-varepsilon$. Uniform continuity implies that $sup_{xin K} f(x) = lambda<1$. Thus
    $$begin{align}
    int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx &= int_{K} f(x)^n, dx + int_{[0,1]backslash K} f(x)^n, dx \
    &le |K|lambda^n + varepsiloncdot1.
    end{align}$$

    Take limit as $ntoinfty$ yields
    $$
    limsup_{nto infty} int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx le varepsilon.
    $$

    Since the above hold for any $varepsilon>0$, we have $int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dxto 0$ as wanted.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Since $f$ is integrable, it is measurable. By Lusin's theorem, for any $varepsilon>0$ there exists a compact set $Ksubset [0,1]$ such that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $K$ and $|K|>1-varepsilon$. Uniform continuity implies that $sup_{xin K} f(x) = lambda<1$. Thus
      $$begin{align}
      int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx &= int_{K} f(x)^n, dx + int_{[0,1]backslash K} f(x)^n, dx \
      &le |K|lambda^n + varepsiloncdot1.
      end{align}$$

      Take limit as $ntoinfty$ yields
      $$
      limsup_{nto infty} int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx le varepsilon.
      $$

      Since the above hold for any $varepsilon>0$, we have $int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dxto 0$ as wanted.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Since $f$ is integrable, it is measurable. By Lusin's theorem, for any $varepsilon>0$ there exists a compact set $Ksubset [0,1]$ such that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $K$ and $|K|>1-varepsilon$. Uniform continuity implies that $sup_{xin K} f(x) = lambda<1$. Thus
        $$begin{align}
        int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx &= int_{K} f(x)^n, dx + int_{[0,1]backslash K} f(x)^n, dx \
        &le |K|lambda^n + varepsiloncdot1.
        end{align}$$

        Take limit as $ntoinfty$ yields
        $$
        limsup_{nto infty} int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx le varepsilon.
        $$

        Since the above hold for any $varepsilon>0$, we have $int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dxto 0$ as wanted.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Since $f$ is integrable, it is measurable. By Lusin's theorem, for any $varepsilon>0$ there exists a compact set $Ksubset [0,1]$ such that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $K$ and $|K|>1-varepsilon$. Uniform continuity implies that $sup_{xin K} f(x) = lambda<1$. Thus
        $$begin{align}
        int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx &= int_{K} f(x)^n, dx + int_{[0,1]backslash K} f(x)^n, dx \
        &le |K|lambda^n + varepsiloncdot1.
        end{align}$$

        Take limit as $ntoinfty$ yields
        $$
        limsup_{nto infty} int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dx le varepsilon.
        $$

        Since the above hold for any $varepsilon>0$, we have $int_{[0,1]} f(x)^n, dxto 0$ as wanted.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 14 '18 at 5:22









        BigbearZzzBigbearZzz

        8,88821652




        8,88821652






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038847%2fgiven-fx-is-integrable-on-0-1-and-0-fx-1-prove-that-int-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Le Mesnil-Réaume

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

            web3.py web3.isConnected() returns false always