Identifying ambiguities











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I used lead and deadly as the ambiguities because they both can have different meaning. But I'm not sure how to explain how they can have different meaning in this sentence and how to restructure this sentence to make it right.



"Consider the sentence, "Diabetes can lead to deadly heart problems." Identify and explain any two ambiguities associated with the sentence."










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Hiking on a trail along a river can lead to being hit by lightening. This sentence, like your sentence, isn't very informative because neither explains the likelihood of the deadly consequences. Your sentence also may be taken by some to imply a causal connection, but that is not very clearly stated.
    – amWhy
    Nov 17 at 18:53










  • "... can lead to" is what I'd say is what is the most ambiguous. But what counts as "deadly heart problems" is also quite vague.
    – amWhy
    Nov 17 at 18:56















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I used lead and deadly as the ambiguities because they both can have different meaning. But I'm not sure how to explain how they can have different meaning in this sentence and how to restructure this sentence to make it right.



"Consider the sentence, "Diabetes can lead to deadly heart problems." Identify and explain any two ambiguities associated with the sentence."










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Hiking on a trail along a river can lead to being hit by lightening. This sentence, like your sentence, isn't very informative because neither explains the likelihood of the deadly consequences. Your sentence also may be taken by some to imply a causal connection, but that is not very clearly stated.
    – amWhy
    Nov 17 at 18:53










  • "... can lead to" is what I'd say is what is the most ambiguous. But what counts as "deadly heart problems" is also quite vague.
    – amWhy
    Nov 17 at 18:56













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I used lead and deadly as the ambiguities because they both can have different meaning. But I'm not sure how to explain how they can have different meaning in this sentence and how to restructure this sentence to make it right.



"Consider the sentence, "Diabetes can lead to deadly heart problems." Identify and explain any two ambiguities associated with the sentence."










share|cite|improve this question















I used lead and deadly as the ambiguities because they both can have different meaning. But I'm not sure how to explain how they can have different meaning in this sentence and how to restructure this sentence to make it right.



"Consider the sentence, "Diabetes can lead to deadly heart problems." Identify and explain any two ambiguities associated with the sentence."







propositional-calculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 17 at 19:03









David G. Stork

8,99421232




8,99421232










asked Nov 17 at 18:48









Kifayat

81




81












  • Hiking on a trail along a river can lead to being hit by lightening. This sentence, like your sentence, isn't very informative because neither explains the likelihood of the deadly consequences. Your sentence also may be taken by some to imply a causal connection, but that is not very clearly stated.
    – amWhy
    Nov 17 at 18:53










  • "... can lead to" is what I'd say is what is the most ambiguous. But what counts as "deadly heart problems" is also quite vague.
    – amWhy
    Nov 17 at 18:56


















  • Hiking on a trail along a river can lead to being hit by lightening. This sentence, like your sentence, isn't very informative because neither explains the likelihood of the deadly consequences. Your sentence also may be taken by some to imply a causal connection, but that is not very clearly stated.
    – amWhy
    Nov 17 at 18:53










  • "... can lead to" is what I'd say is what is the most ambiguous. But what counts as "deadly heart problems" is also quite vague.
    – amWhy
    Nov 17 at 18:56
















Hiking on a trail along a river can lead to being hit by lightening. This sentence, like your sentence, isn't very informative because neither explains the likelihood of the deadly consequences. Your sentence also may be taken by some to imply a causal connection, but that is not very clearly stated.
– amWhy
Nov 17 at 18:53




Hiking on a trail along a river can lead to being hit by lightening. This sentence, like your sentence, isn't very informative because neither explains the likelihood of the deadly consequences. Your sentence also may be taken by some to imply a causal connection, but that is not very clearly stated.
– amWhy
Nov 17 at 18:53












"... can lead to" is what I'd say is what is the most ambiguous. But what counts as "deadly heart problems" is also quite vague.
– amWhy
Nov 17 at 18:56




"... can lead to" is what I'd say is what is the most ambiguous. But what counts as "deadly heart problems" is also quite vague.
– amWhy
Nov 17 at 18:56










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










English is a very sloppy language. There are many ambiguities in the statement. Some of them are more obviously absurd than others.




  • "Diabetes" could refer to my pet dog Diabetes.

  • "can lead to" is extremely vague. Does it imply a factual causal link ("if you have diabetes, then your diabetes may cause your heart to become faulty") or a roundabout route ("if you have diabetes, then you will take insulin, which will cause heart problems"), or a correlation ("if you have diabetes, then this is an indication that you are genetically predisposed to get heart disease later"), or any one of a number of other things?

  • "Deadly heart problems" could mean that my heart problems are deadly to others (if I'm a pilot and my arrhythmia makes me feel faint), or that they're deadly to myself.

  • "Deadly heart problems" can mean "problems with my deadly heart" (perhaps my heart contains lots of vitamin A which is poisonous when consumed).


If you're interested in this kind of thing, I recommend studying the grammar of the constructed language Ithkuil, which is really precise about lots of things which English simply leaves to context.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002683%2fidentifying-ambiguities%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    English is a very sloppy language. There are many ambiguities in the statement. Some of them are more obviously absurd than others.




    • "Diabetes" could refer to my pet dog Diabetes.

    • "can lead to" is extremely vague. Does it imply a factual causal link ("if you have diabetes, then your diabetes may cause your heart to become faulty") or a roundabout route ("if you have diabetes, then you will take insulin, which will cause heart problems"), or a correlation ("if you have diabetes, then this is an indication that you are genetically predisposed to get heart disease later"), or any one of a number of other things?

    • "Deadly heart problems" could mean that my heart problems are deadly to others (if I'm a pilot and my arrhythmia makes me feel faint), or that they're deadly to myself.

    • "Deadly heart problems" can mean "problems with my deadly heart" (perhaps my heart contains lots of vitamin A which is poisonous when consumed).


    If you're interested in this kind of thing, I recommend studying the grammar of the constructed language Ithkuil, which is really precise about lots of things which English simply leaves to context.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote



      accepted










      English is a very sloppy language. There are many ambiguities in the statement. Some of them are more obviously absurd than others.




      • "Diabetes" could refer to my pet dog Diabetes.

      • "can lead to" is extremely vague. Does it imply a factual causal link ("if you have diabetes, then your diabetes may cause your heart to become faulty") or a roundabout route ("if you have diabetes, then you will take insulin, which will cause heart problems"), or a correlation ("if you have diabetes, then this is an indication that you are genetically predisposed to get heart disease later"), or any one of a number of other things?

      • "Deadly heart problems" could mean that my heart problems are deadly to others (if I'm a pilot and my arrhythmia makes me feel faint), or that they're deadly to myself.

      • "Deadly heart problems" can mean "problems with my deadly heart" (perhaps my heart contains lots of vitamin A which is poisonous when consumed).


      If you're interested in this kind of thing, I recommend studying the grammar of the constructed language Ithkuil, which is really precise about lots of things which English simply leaves to context.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted






        English is a very sloppy language. There are many ambiguities in the statement. Some of them are more obviously absurd than others.




        • "Diabetes" could refer to my pet dog Diabetes.

        • "can lead to" is extremely vague. Does it imply a factual causal link ("if you have diabetes, then your diabetes may cause your heart to become faulty") or a roundabout route ("if you have diabetes, then you will take insulin, which will cause heart problems"), or a correlation ("if you have diabetes, then this is an indication that you are genetically predisposed to get heart disease later"), or any one of a number of other things?

        • "Deadly heart problems" could mean that my heart problems are deadly to others (if I'm a pilot and my arrhythmia makes me feel faint), or that they're deadly to myself.

        • "Deadly heart problems" can mean "problems with my deadly heart" (perhaps my heart contains lots of vitamin A which is poisonous when consumed).


        If you're interested in this kind of thing, I recommend studying the grammar of the constructed language Ithkuil, which is really precise about lots of things which English simply leaves to context.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        English is a very sloppy language. There are many ambiguities in the statement. Some of them are more obviously absurd than others.




        • "Diabetes" could refer to my pet dog Diabetes.

        • "can lead to" is extremely vague. Does it imply a factual causal link ("if you have diabetes, then your diabetes may cause your heart to become faulty") or a roundabout route ("if you have diabetes, then you will take insulin, which will cause heart problems"), or a correlation ("if you have diabetes, then this is an indication that you are genetically predisposed to get heart disease later"), or any one of a number of other things?

        • "Deadly heart problems" could mean that my heart problems are deadly to others (if I'm a pilot and my arrhythmia makes me feel faint), or that they're deadly to myself.

        • "Deadly heart problems" can mean "problems with my deadly heart" (perhaps my heart contains lots of vitamin A which is poisonous when consumed).


        If you're interested in this kind of thing, I recommend studying the grammar of the constructed language Ithkuil, which is really precise about lots of things which English simply leaves to context.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 17 at 19:12









        Patrick Stevens

        27.9k52873




        27.9k52873






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002683%2fidentifying-ambiguities%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten