Statistics-relationships between gamma and exponential distribution
Just want to clarify whether the following is correct:
If gamma(a,b) ,then exp(a/b)?
where a,b are parameters for gamma
and a/b is the parameter for exp
for example, gamma(1,2)=exp(1/2)
Is this true for every a,b>0?
Thank you!
statistics probability-distributions
add a comment |
Just want to clarify whether the following is correct:
If gamma(a,b) ,then exp(a/b)?
where a,b are parameters for gamma
and a/b is the parameter for exp
for example, gamma(1,2)=exp(1/2)
Is this true for every a,b>0?
Thank you!
statistics probability-distributions
add a comment |
Just want to clarify whether the following is correct:
If gamma(a,b) ,then exp(a/b)?
where a,b are parameters for gamma
and a/b is the parameter for exp
for example, gamma(1,2)=exp(1/2)
Is this true for every a,b>0?
Thank you!
statistics probability-distributions
Just want to clarify whether the following is correct:
If gamma(a,b) ,then exp(a/b)?
where a,b are parameters for gamma
and a/b is the parameter for exp
for example, gamma(1,2)=exp(1/2)
Is this true for every a,b>0?
Thank you!
statistics probability-distributions
statistics probability-distributions
edited Nov 28 '18 at 0:09
carmichael561
46.9k54382
46.9k54382
asked Mar 10 '16 at 16:25
UnusualSkill
442312
442312
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The PDF for the $Gamma(alpha,lambda)$ distribution is
$$ f(x)=frac{x^{alpha-1}lambda^{alpha}}{Gamma(alpha)}e^{-lambda x}$$
for $x>0$. This is not the PDF for any exponential distribution unless $alpha=1$.
However, the gamma and exponential distributions are closely related: if $X_1,dots,X_k$ are independent and exponentially distributed with parameter $lambda$, then $X_1+dots+X_k$ is $Gamma$ distributed with parameters $k$ and $lambda$.
means if alpha=1, then gamma(1,b)=exp(1/b)?
– UnusualSkill
Mar 10 '16 at 16:40
If $alpha=1$, then the gamma distribution is in fact an exponential distribution.
– carmichael561
Mar 10 '16 at 17:04
What if K isn’t an integer?
– John Cataldo
Feb 20 '18 at 13:51
@Stanislas Hildebrandt: the gamma distribution is defined for non-integer $alpha$, but it doesn't really make sense to sum up a non-integer number of exponential random variables.
– carmichael561
Feb 20 '18 at 16:18
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1691745%2fstatistics-relationships-between-gamma-and-exponential-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The PDF for the $Gamma(alpha,lambda)$ distribution is
$$ f(x)=frac{x^{alpha-1}lambda^{alpha}}{Gamma(alpha)}e^{-lambda x}$$
for $x>0$. This is not the PDF for any exponential distribution unless $alpha=1$.
However, the gamma and exponential distributions are closely related: if $X_1,dots,X_k$ are independent and exponentially distributed with parameter $lambda$, then $X_1+dots+X_k$ is $Gamma$ distributed with parameters $k$ and $lambda$.
means if alpha=1, then gamma(1,b)=exp(1/b)?
– UnusualSkill
Mar 10 '16 at 16:40
If $alpha=1$, then the gamma distribution is in fact an exponential distribution.
– carmichael561
Mar 10 '16 at 17:04
What if K isn’t an integer?
– John Cataldo
Feb 20 '18 at 13:51
@Stanislas Hildebrandt: the gamma distribution is defined for non-integer $alpha$, but it doesn't really make sense to sum up a non-integer number of exponential random variables.
– carmichael561
Feb 20 '18 at 16:18
add a comment |
The PDF for the $Gamma(alpha,lambda)$ distribution is
$$ f(x)=frac{x^{alpha-1}lambda^{alpha}}{Gamma(alpha)}e^{-lambda x}$$
for $x>0$. This is not the PDF for any exponential distribution unless $alpha=1$.
However, the gamma and exponential distributions are closely related: if $X_1,dots,X_k$ are independent and exponentially distributed with parameter $lambda$, then $X_1+dots+X_k$ is $Gamma$ distributed with parameters $k$ and $lambda$.
means if alpha=1, then gamma(1,b)=exp(1/b)?
– UnusualSkill
Mar 10 '16 at 16:40
If $alpha=1$, then the gamma distribution is in fact an exponential distribution.
– carmichael561
Mar 10 '16 at 17:04
What if K isn’t an integer?
– John Cataldo
Feb 20 '18 at 13:51
@Stanislas Hildebrandt: the gamma distribution is defined for non-integer $alpha$, but it doesn't really make sense to sum up a non-integer number of exponential random variables.
– carmichael561
Feb 20 '18 at 16:18
add a comment |
The PDF for the $Gamma(alpha,lambda)$ distribution is
$$ f(x)=frac{x^{alpha-1}lambda^{alpha}}{Gamma(alpha)}e^{-lambda x}$$
for $x>0$. This is not the PDF for any exponential distribution unless $alpha=1$.
However, the gamma and exponential distributions are closely related: if $X_1,dots,X_k$ are independent and exponentially distributed with parameter $lambda$, then $X_1+dots+X_k$ is $Gamma$ distributed with parameters $k$ and $lambda$.
The PDF for the $Gamma(alpha,lambda)$ distribution is
$$ f(x)=frac{x^{alpha-1}lambda^{alpha}}{Gamma(alpha)}e^{-lambda x}$$
for $x>0$. This is not the PDF for any exponential distribution unless $alpha=1$.
However, the gamma and exponential distributions are closely related: if $X_1,dots,X_k$ are independent and exponentially distributed with parameter $lambda$, then $X_1+dots+X_k$ is $Gamma$ distributed with parameters $k$ and $lambda$.
answered Mar 10 '16 at 16:38
carmichael561
46.9k54382
46.9k54382
means if alpha=1, then gamma(1,b)=exp(1/b)?
– UnusualSkill
Mar 10 '16 at 16:40
If $alpha=1$, then the gamma distribution is in fact an exponential distribution.
– carmichael561
Mar 10 '16 at 17:04
What if K isn’t an integer?
– John Cataldo
Feb 20 '18 at 13:51
@Stanislas Hildebrandt: the gamma distribution is defined for non-integer $alpha$, but it doesn't really make sense to sum up a non-integer number of exponential random variables.
– carmichael561
Feb 20 '18 at 16:18
add a comment |
means if alpha=1, then gamma(1,b)=exp(1/b)?
– UnusualSkill
Mar 10 '16 at 16:40
If $alpha=1$, then the gamma distribution is in fact an exponential distribution.
– carmichael561
Mar 10 '16 at 17:04
What if K isn’t an integer?
– John Cataldo
Feb 20 '18 at 13:51
@Stanislas Hildebrandt: the gamma distribution is defined for non-integer $alpha$, but it doesn't really make sense to sum up a non-integer number of exponential random variables.
– carmichael561
Feb 20 '18 at 16:18
means if alpha=1, then gamma(1,b)=exp(1/b)?
– UnusualSkill
Mar 10 '16 at 16:40
means if alpha=1, then gamma(1,b)=exp(1/b)?
– UnusualSkill
Mar 10 '16 at 16:40
If $alpha=1$, then the gamma distribution is in fact an exponential distribution.
– carmichael561
Mar 10 '16 at 17:04
If $alpha=1$, then the gamma distribution is in fact an exponential distribution.
– carmichael561
Mar 10 '16 at 17:04
What if K isn’t an integer?
– John Cataldo
Feb 20 '18 at 13:51
What if K isn’t an integer?
– John Cataldo
Feb 20 '18 at 13:51
@Stanislas Hildebrandt: the gamma distribution is defined for non-integer $alpha$, but it doesn't really make sense to sum up a non-integer number of exponential random variables.
– carmichael561
Feb 20 '18 at 16:18
@Stanislas Hildebrandt: the gamma distribution is defined for non-integer $alpha$, but it doesn't really make sense to sum up a non-integer number of exponential random variables.
– carmichael561
Feb 20 '18 at 16:18
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1691745%2fstatistics-relationships-between-gamma-and-exponential-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown