Statistics-relationships between gamma and exponential distribution












0














Just want to clarify whether the following is correct:
If gamma(a,b) ,then exp(a/b)?



where a,b are parameters for gamma
and a/b is the parameter for exp



for example, gamma(1,2)=exp(1/2)
Is this true for every a,b>0?
Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question





























    0














    Just want to clarify whether the following is correct:
    If gamma(a,b) ,then exp(a/b)?



    where a,b are parameters for gamma
    and a/b is the parameter for exp



    for example, gamma(1,2)=exp(1/2)
    Is this true for every a,b>0?
    Thank you!










    share|cite|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0







      Just want to clarify whether the following is correct:
      If gamma(a,b) ,then exp(a/b)?



      where a,b are parameters for gamma
      and a/b is the parameter for exp



      for example, gamma(1,2)=exp(1/2)
      Is this true for every a,b>0?
      Thank you!










      share|cite|improve this question















      Just want to clarify whether the following is correct:
      If gamma(a,b) ,then exp(a/b)?



      where a,b are parameters for gamma
      and a/b is the parameter for exp



      for example, gamma(1,2)=exp(1/2)
      Is this true for every a,b>0?
      Thank you!







      statistics probability-distributions






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 28 '18 at 0:09









      carmichael561

      46.9k54382




      46.9k54382










      asked Mar 10 '16 at 16:25









      UnusualSkill

      442312




      442312






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          The PDF for the $Gamma(alpha,lambda)$ distribution is
          $$ f(x)=frac{x^{alpha-1}lambda^{alpha}}{Gamma(alpha)}e^{-lambda x}$$
          for $x>0$. This is not the PDF for any exponential distribution unless $alpha=1$.



          However, the gamma and exponential distributions are closely related: if $X_1,dots,X_k$ are independent and exponentially distributed with parameter $lambda$, then $X_1+dots+X_k$ is $Gamma$ distributed with parameters $k$ and $lambda$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • means if alpha=1, then gamma(1,b)=exp(1/b)?
            – UnusualSkill
            Mar 10 '16 at 16:40












          • If $alpha=1$, then the gamma distribution is in fact an exponential distribution.
            – carmichael561
            Mar 10 '16 at 17:04










          • What if K isn’t an integer?
            – John Cataldo
            Feb 20 '18 at 13:51










          • @Stanislas Hildebrandt: the gamma distribution is defined for non-integer $alpha$, but it doesn't really make sense to sum up a non-integer number of exponential random variables.
            – carmichael561
            Feb 20 '18 at 16:18











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1691745%2fstatistics-relationships-between-gamma-and-exponential-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          The PDF for the $Gamma(alpha,lambda)$ distribution is
          $$ f(x)=frac{x^{alpha-1}lambda^{alpha}}{Gamma(alpha)}e^{-lambda x}$$
          for $x>0$. This is not the PDF for any exponential distribution unless $alpha=1$.



          However, the gamma and exponential distributions are closely related: if $X_1,dots,X_k$ are independent and exponentially distributed with parameter $lambda$, then $X_1+dots+X_k$ is $Gamma$ distributed with parameters $k$ and $lambda$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • means if alpha=1, then gamma(1,b)=exp(1/b)?
            – UnusualSkill
            Mar 10 '16 at 16:40












          • If $alpha=1$, then the gamma distribution is in fact an exponential distribution.
            – carmichael561
            Mar 10 '16 at 17:04










          • What if K isn’t an integer?
            – John Cataldo
            Feb 20 '18 at 13:51










          • @Stanislas Hildebrandt: the gamma distribution is defined for non-integer $alpha$, but it doesn't really make sense to sum up a non-integer number of exponential random variables.
            – carmichael561
            Feb 20 '18 at 16:18
















          4














          The PDF for the $Gamma(alpha,lambda)$ distribution is
          $$ f(x)=frac{x^{alpha-1}lambda^{alpha}}{Gamma(alpha)}e^{-lambda x}$$
          for $x>0$. This is not the PDF for any exponential distribution unless $alpha=1$.



          However, the gamma and exponential distributions are closely related: if $X_1,dots,X_k$ are independent and exponentially distributed with parameter $lambda$, then $X_1+dots+X_k$ is $Gamma$ distributed with parameters $k$ and $lambda$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • means if alpha=1, then gamma(1,b)=exp(1/b)?
            – UnusualSkill
            Mar 10 '16 at 16:40












          • If $alpha=1$, then the gamma distribution is in fact an exponential distribution.
            – carmichael561
            Mar 10 '16 at 17:04










          • What if K isn’t an integer?
            – John Cataldo
            Feb 20 '18 at 13:51










          • @Stanislas Hildebrandt: the gamma distribution is defined for non-integer $alpha$, but it doesn't really make sense to sum up a non-integer number of exponential random variables.
            – carmichael561
            Feb 20 '18 at 16:18














          4












          4








          4






          The PDF for the $Gamma(alpha,lambda)$ distribution is
          $$ f(x)=frac{x^{alpha-1}lambda^{alpha}}{Gamma(alpha)}e^{-lambda x}$$
          for $x>0$. This is not the PDF for any exponential distribution unless $alpha=1$.



          However, the gamma and exponential distributions are closely related: if $X_1,dots,X_k$ are independent and exponentially distributed with parameter $lambda$, then $X_1+dots+X_k$ is $Gamma$ distributed with parameters $k$ and $lambda$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          The PDF for the $Gamma(alpha,lambda)$ distribution is
          $$ f(x)=frac{x^{alpha-1}lambda^{alpha}}{Gamma(alpha)}e^{-lambda x}$$
          for $x>0$. This is not the PDF for any exponential distribution unless $alpha=1$.



          However, the gamma and exponential distributions are closely related: if $X_1,dots,X_k$ are independent and exponentially distributed with parameter $lambda$, then $X_1+dots+X_k$ is $Gamma$ distributed with parameters $k$ and $lambda$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 10 '16 at 16:38









          carmichael561

          46.9k54382




          46.9k54382












          • means if alpha=1, then gamma(1,b)=exp(1/b)?
            – UnusualSkill
            Mar 10 '16 at 16:40












          • If $alpha=1$, then the gamma distribution is in fact an exponential distribution.
            – carmichael561
            Mar 10 '16 at 17:04










          • What if K isn’t an integer?
            – John Cataldo
            Feb 20 '18 at 13:51










          • @Stanislas Hildebrandt: the gamma distribution is defined for non-integer $alpha$, but it doesn't really make sense to sum up a non-integer number of exponential random variables.
            – carmichael561
            Feb 20 '18 at 16:18


















          • means if alpha=1, then gamma(1,b)=exp(1/b)?
            – UnusualSkill
            Mar 10 '16 at 16:40












          • If $alpha=1$, then the gamma distribution is in fact an exponential distribution.
            – carmichael561
            Mar 10 '16 at 17:04










          • What if K isn’t an integer?
            – John Cataldo
            Feb 20 '18 at 13:51










          • @Stanislas Hildebrandt: the gamma distribution is defined for non-integer $alpha$, but it doesn't really make sense to sum up a non-integer number of exponential random variables.
            – carmichael561
            Feb 20 '18 at 16:18
















          means if alpha=1, then gamma(1,b)=exp(1/b)?
          – UnusualSkill
          Mar 10 '16 at 16:40






          means if alpha=1, then gamma(1,b)=exp(1/b)?
          – UnusualSkill
          Mar 10 '16 at 16:40














          If $alpha=1$, then the gamma distribution is in fact an exponential distribution.
          – carmichael561
          Mar 10 '16 at 17:04




          If $alpha=1$, then the gamma distribution is in fact an exponential distribution.
          – carmichael561
          Mar 10 '16 at 17:04












          What if K isn’t an integer?
          – John Cataldo
          Feb 20 '18 at 13:51




          What if K isn’t an integer?
          – John Cataldo
          Feb 20 '18 at 13:51












          @Stanislas Hildebrandt: the gamma distribution is defined for non-integer $alpha$, but it doesn't really make sense to sum up a non-integer number of exponential random variables.
          – carmichael561
          Feb 20 '18 at 16:18




          @Stanislas Hildebrandt: the gamma distribution is defined for non-integer $alpha$, but it doesn't really make sense to sum up a non-integer number of exponential random variables.
          – carmichael561
          Feb 20 '18 at 16:18


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1691745%2fstatistics-relationships-between-gamma-and-exponential-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Verónica Boquete

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten