Bessel integral invovling algebraic and hyperbolic functions












2












$begingroup$


I am desperate in evaluating the following Hankel transform
$$
int_{0}^{infty} frac{J_0(kr)}{k^2+xi^2} frac{cosh(ky)}{cosh(k)} kmathrm{d} k,
$$

where $J_0(kr)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind and where the interest is focused on where $k$ is small.



By expanding the hyperbolic function about $k=0$,
$$
frac{cosh(ky)}{cosh(k)} = 1 + textit{O}(k^2),
$$

and the preceding integral reduces to
$$
int_{0}^{infty} frac{J_0(kr)}{k^2+xi^2} kmathrm{d} k = K_0(xi r),
$$

where $K_0(xi r)$ is the modified Bessel function of the second kind.



The problem is the approximation for the hyperbolic function is valid only about $k=0$, while the integral is over the $kin(0,infty)$. How can I justify this controversy?



Or, perhaps it is acceptable to evaluate
$$
int_{0}^{1} frac{J_0(kr)}{k^2+xi^2} kmathrm{d} k,
$$

instead, but how to do this?



Thanking you and, please, could you help me...



Wang Zhe










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    I am desperate in evaluating the following Hankel transform
    $$
    int_{0}^{infty} frac{J_0(kr)}{k^2+xi^2} frac{cosh(ky)}{cosh(k)} kmathrm{d} k,
    $$

    where $J_0(kr)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind and where the interest is focused on where $k$ is small.



    By expanding the hyperbolic function about $k=0$,
    $$
    frac{cosh(ky)}{cosh(k)} = 1 + textit{O}(k^2),
    $$

    and the preceding integral reduces to
    $$
    int_{0}^{infty} frac{J_0(kr)}{k^2+xi^2} kmathrm{d} k = K_0(xi r),
    $$

    where $K_0(xi r)$ is the modified Bessel function of the second kind.



    The problem is the approximation for the hyperbolic function is valid only about $k=0$, while the integral is over the $kin(0,infty)$. How can I justify this controversy?



    Or, perhaps it is acceptable to evaluate
    $$
    int_{0}^{1} frac{J_0(kr)}{k^2+xi^2} kmathrm{d} k,
    $$

    instead, but how to do this?



    Thanking you and, please, could you help me...



    Wang Zhe










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      I am desperate in evaluating the following Hankel transform
      $$
      int_{0}^{infty} frac{J_0(kr)}{k^2+xi^2} frac{cosh(ky)}{cosh(k)} kmathrm{d} k,
      $$

      where $J_0(kr)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind and where the interest is focused on where $k$ is small.



      By expanding the hyperbolic function about $k=0$,
      $$
      frac{cosh(ky)}{cosh(k)} = 1 + textit{O}(k^2),
      $$

      and the preceding integral reduces to
      $$
      int_{0}^{infty} frac{J_0(kr)}{k^2+xi^2} kmathrm{d} k = K_0(xi r),
      $$

      where $K_0(xi r)$ is the modified Bessel function of the second kind.



      The problem is the approximation for the hyperbolic function is valid only about $k=0$, while the integral is over the $kin(0,infty)$. How can I justify this controversy?



      Or, perhaps it is acceptable to evaluate
      $$
      int_{0}^{1} frac{J_0(kr)}{k^2+xi^2} kmathrm{d} k,
      $$

      instead, but how to do this?



      Thanking you and, please, could you help me...



      Wang Zhe










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am desperate in evaluating the following Hankel transform
      $$
      int_{0}^{infty} frac{J_0(kr)}{k^2+xi^2} frac{cosh(ky)}{cosh(k)} kmathrm{d} k,
      $$

      where $J_0(kr)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind and where the interest is focused on where $k$ is small.



      By expanding the hyperbolic function about $k=0$,
      $$
      frac{cosh(ky)}{cosh(k)} = 1 + textit{O}(k^2),
      $$

      and the preceding integral reduces to
      $$
      int_{0}^{infty} frac{J_0(kr)}{k^2+xi^2} kmathrm{d} k = K_0(xi r),
      $$

      where $K_0(xi r)$ is the modified Bessel function of the second kind.



      The problem is the approximation for the hyperbolic function is valid only about $k=0$, while the integral is over the $kin(0,infty)$. How can I justify this controversy?



      Or, perhaps it is acceptable to evaluate
      $$
      int_{0}^{1} frac{J_0(kr)}{k^2+xi^2} kmathrm{d} k,
      $$

      instead, but how to do this?



      Thanking you and, please, could you help me...



      Wang Zhe







      definite-integrals bessel-functions integral-transforms






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 17 '18 at 15:33







      Zhe Wang

















      asked Dec 17 '18 at 10:20









      Zhe WangZhe Wang

      112




      112






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043769%2fbessel-integral-invovling-algebraic-and-hyperbolic-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043769%2fbessel-integral-invovling-algebraic-and-hyperbolic-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Verónica Boquete

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten