prove that for the equivalence class : X/(X/E) = E
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let E be an equivalence relation on the set X .
prove that: X / (X / E) = E
The definition of euivalence class: x/E = { for every y in the X | xEy }
The set of all equivalence classes: X/E = { x/E | x is a member of X }
relations equivalence-relations
asked Nov 22 at 22:13
Yahya
175
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let E be an equivalence relation on the set X .
prove that: X / (X / E) = E
The definition of euivalence class: x/E = { for every y in the X | xEy }
The set of all equivalence classes: X/E = { x/E | x is a member of X }
relations equivalence-relations
asked Nov 22 at 22:13
Yahya
175
1
You defined x/E but did not define X/E.
– William Elliot
Nov 23 at 2:07
@WilliamElliot Yes you are right. I have edited the information and appended the definition of X/E.
– Yahya
Nov 23 at 8:03
1
Ok. So how is X/E, a collection of subsets of X, an equivalence relation. X/E subset P(X). Equivalence relations for X are subsets of X×X.
– William Elliot
Nov 23 at 11:39
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let E be an equivalence relation on the set X .
prove that: X / (X / E) = E
The definition of euivalence class: x/E = { for every y in the X | xEy }
The set of all equivalence classes: X/E = { x/E | x is a member of X }
relations equivalence-relations
asked Nov 22 at 22:13
Yahya
175
Let E be an equivalence relation on the set X .
prove that: X / (X / E) = E
The definition of euivalence class: x/E = { for every y in the X | xEy }
The set of all equivalence classes: X/E = { x/E | x is a member of X }
relations equivalence-relations
relations equivalence-relations
asked Nov 22 at 22:13
Yahya
175
asked Nov 22 at 22:13
Yahya
175
edited Nov 23 at 8:01
asked Nov 22 at 22:13
Yahya
175
asked Nov 22 at 22:13
Yahya
175
asked Nov 22 at 22:13
Yahya
175
175
1
You defined x/E but did not define X/E.
– William Elliot
Nov 23 at 2:07
@WilliamElliot Yes you are right. I have edited the information and appended the definition of X/E.
– Yahya
Nov 23 at 8:03
1
Ok. So how is X/E, a collection of subsets of X, an equivalence relation. X/E subset P(X). Equivalence relations for X are subsets of X×X.
– William Elliot
Nov 23 at 11:39
add a comment |
1
You defined x/E but did not define X/E.
– William Elliot
Nov 23 at 2:07
@WilliamElliot Yes you are right. I have edited the information and appended the definition of X/E.
– Yahya
Nov 23 at 8:03
1
Ok. So how is X/E, a collection of subsets of X, an equivalence relation. X/E subset P(X). Equivalence relations for X are subsets of X×X.
– William Elliot
Nov 23 at 11:39
1
1
You defined x/E but did not define X/E.
– William Elliot
Nov 23 at 2:07
You defined x/E but did not define X/E.
– William Elliot
Nov 23 at 2:07
@WilliamElliot Yes you are right. I have edited the information and appended the definition of X/E.
– Yahya
Nov 23 at 8:03
@WilliamElliot Yes you are right. I have edited the information and appended the definition of X/E.
– Yahya
Nov 23 at 8:03
1
1
Ok. So how is X/E, a collection of subsets of X, an equivalence relation. X/E subset P(X). Equivalence relations for X are subsets of X×X.
– William Elliot
Nov 23 at 11:39
Ok. So how is X/E, a collection of subsets of X, an equivalence relation. X/E subset P(X). Equivalence relations for X are subsets of X×X.
– William Elliot
Nov 23 at 11:39
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009735%2fprove-that-for-the-equivalence-class-x-x-e-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009735%2fprove-that-for-the-equivalence-class-x-x-e-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
You defined x/E but did not define X/E.
– William Elliot
Nov 23 at 2:07
@WilliamElliot Yes you are right. I have edited the information and appended the definition of X/E.
– Yahya
Nov 23 at 8:03
1
Ok. So how is X/E, a collection of subsets of X, an equivalence relation. X/E subset P(X). Equivalence relations for X are subsets of X×X.
– William Elliot
Nov 23 at 11:39