A Lipschitz Implicit Function Theorem.











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
3












I look for a reference (book or article) that contains the statement of a version of the implicit function theorem as stated below. This statement I found in notes (with due proof) on the implicit function written by KC Border.



enter image description here



In these notes the author states that the proof is based on the proof of the implicit function theorem for two-variable functions given by Apostol in his calculus book. I looked at the proof given by Apostol in his calculus book (Calculus vol.2) and in fact the proof method of the above theorem is, with due adaptations, the same.



I am writing notes on the implicit function theorem. However, I did not want to have to repeat the proof, but to indicate to the reader a formal reference containing the proof.





Update 11/13/2018



I have already searched in the following textbooks




  • Implicit Functions and Solution Mappings. A View from Variational Analysis


  • The Implicit Function Theorem: History, Theory, and Applications


  • Nonlinear Functional Analysis



But I did not succeed.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What does $x_{-}y$ mean?
    – zhw.
    Nov 22 at 21:40












  • @zhw. Here $ x $ and $ y $ are variables in $mathbb{R}$ and $x_{-}y$ is $ x-y $. The subtraction of $ x $ by $ y $.
    – MathOverview
    Nov 22 at 21:44












  • @zhw. I edited the image. I believe that there is no more doubt now.
    – MathOverview
    Nov 22 at 21:58










  • What is wrong with a reference to that pdf?
    – HTFB
    Nov 23 at 16:26










  • @HTFB The position of the minus sign in the expression $ y-x $ was not at the correct height. This seemed to indicate some abstract operation between $ x $ and $ and $ y$. But it has already been corrected.
    – MathOverview
    Nov 23 at 23:24















up vote
4
down vote

favorite
3












I look for a reference (book or article) that contains the statement of a version of the implicit function theorem as stated below. This statement I found in notes (with due proof) on the implicit function written by KC Border.



enter image description here



In these notes the author states that the proof is based on the proof of the implicit function theorem for two-variable functions given by Apostol in his calculus book. I looked at the proof given by Apostol in his calculus book (Calculus vol.2) and in fact the proof method of the above theorem is, with due adaptations, the same.



I am writing notes on the implicit function theorem. However, I did not want to have to repeat the proof, but to indicate to the reader a formal reference containing the proof.





Update 11/13/2018



I have already searched in the following textbooks




  • Implicit Functions and Solution Mappings. A View from Variational Analysis


  • The Implicit Function Theorem: History, Theory, and Applications


  • Nonlinear Functional Analysis



But I did not succeed.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What does $x_{-}y$ mean?
    – zhw.
    Nov 22 at 21:40












  • @zhw. Here $ x $ and $ y $ are variables in $mathbb{R}$ and $x_{-}y$ is $ x-y $. The subtraction of $ x $ by $ y $.
    – MathOverview
    Nov 22 at 21:44












  • @zhw. I edited the image. I believe that there is no more doubt now.
    – MathOverview
    Nov 22 at 21:58










  • What is wrong with a reference to that pdf?
    – HTFB
    Nov 23 at 16:26










  • @HTFB The position of the minus sign in the expression $ y-x $ was not at the correct height. This seemed to indicate some abstract operation between $ x $ and $ and $ y$. But it has already been corrected.
    – MathOverview
    Nov 23 at 23:24













up vote
4
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
3






3





I look for a reference (book or article) that contains the statement of a version of the implicit function theorem as stated below. This statement I found in notes (with due proof) on the implicit function written by KC Border.



enter image description here



In these notes the author states that the proof is based on the proof of the implicit function theorem for two-variable functions given by Apostol in his calculus book. I looked at the proof given by Apostol in his calculus book (Calculus vol.2) and in fact the proof method of the above theorem is, with due adaptations, the same.



I am writing notes on the implicit function theorem. However, I did not want to have to repeat the proof, but to indicate to the reader a formal reference containing the proof.





Update 11/13/2018



I have already searched in the following textbooks




  • Implicit Functions and Solution Mappings. A View from Variational Analysis


  • The Implicit Function Theorem: History, Theory, and Applications


  • Nonlinear Functional Analysis



But I did not succeed.










share|cite|improve this question















I look for a reference (book or article) that contains the statement of a version of the implicit function theorem as stated below. This statement I found in notes (with due proof) on the implicit function written by KC Border.



enter image description here



In these notes the author states that the proof is based on the proof of the implicit function theorem for two-variable functions given by Apostol in his calculus book. I looked at the proof given by Apostol in his calculus book (Calculus vol.2) and in fact the proof method of the above theorem is, with due adaptations, the same.



I am writing notes on the implicit function theorem. However, I did not want to have to repeat the proof, but to indicate to the reader a formal reference containing the proof.





Update 11/13/2018



I have already searched in the following textbooks




  • Implicit Functions and Solution Mappings. A View from Variational Analysis


  • The Implicit Function Theorem: History, Theory, and Applications


  • Nonlinear Functional Analysis



But I did not succeed.







real-analysis general-topology analysis reference-request implicit-function-theorem






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 22 at 21:57

























asked Nov 10 at 13:42









MathOverview

8,51443063




8,51443063












  • What does $x_{-}y$ mean?
    – zhw.
    Nov 22 at 21:40












  • @zhw. Here $ x $ and $ y $ are variables in $mathbb{R}$ and $x_{-}y$ is $ x-y $. The subtraction of $ x $ by $ y $.
    – MathOverview
    Nov 22 at 21:44












  • @zhw. I edited the image. I believe that there is no more doubt now.
    – MathOverview
    Nov 22 at 21:58










  • What is wrong with a reference to that pdf?
    – HTFB
    Nov 23 at 16:26










  • @HTFB The position of the minus sign in the expression $ y-x $ was not at the correct height. This seemed to indicate some abstract operation between $ x $ and $ and $ y$. But it has already been corrected.
    – MathOverview
    Nov 23 at 23:24


















  • What does $x_{-}y$ mean?
    – zhw.
    Nov 22 at 21:40












  • @zhw. Here $ x $ and $ y $ are variables in $mathbb{R}$ and $x_{-}y$ is $ x-y $. The subtraction of $ x $ by $ y $.
    – MathOverview
    Nov 22 at 21:44












  • @zhw. I edited the image. I believe that there is no more doubt now.
    – MathOverview
    Nov 22 at 21:58










  • What is wrong with a reference to that pdf?
    – HTFB
    Nov 23 at 16:26










  • @HTFB The position of the minus sign in the expression $ y-x $ was not at the correct height. This seemed to indicate some abstract operation between $ x $ and $ and $ y$. But it has already been corrected.
    – MathOverview
    Nov 23 at 23:24
















What does $x_{-}y$ mean?
– zhw.
Nov 22 at 21:40






What does $x_{-}y$ mean?
– zhw.
Nov 22 at 21:40














@zhw. Here $ x $ and $ y $ are variables in $mathbb{R}$ and $x_{-}y$ is $ x-y $. The subtraction of $ x $ by $ y $.
– MathOverview
Nov 22 at 21:44






@zhw. Here $ x $ and $ y $ are variables in $mathbb{R}$ and $x_{-}y$ is $ x-y $. The subtraction of $ x $ by $ y $.
– MathOverview
Nov 22 at 21:44














@zhw. I edited the image. I believe that there is no more doubt now.
– MathOverview
Nov 22 at 21:58




@zhw. I edited the image. I believe that there is no more doubt now.
– MathOverview
Nov 22 at 21:58












What is wrong with a reference to that pdf?
– HTFB
Nov 23 at 16:26




What is wrong with a reference to that pdf?
– HTFB
Nov 23 at 16:26












@HTFB The position of the minus sign in the expression $ y-x $ was not at the correct height. This seemed to indicate some abstract operation between $ x $ and $ and $ y$. But it has already been corrected.
– MathOverview
Nov 23 at 23:24




@HTFB The position of the minus sign in the expression $ y-x $ was not at the correct height. This seemed to indicate some abstract operation between $ x $ and $ and $ y$. But it has already been corrected.
– MathOverview
Nov 23 at 23:24















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2992658%2fa-lipschitz-implicit-function-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2992658%2fa-lipschitz-implicit-function-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Verónica Boquete

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten