Why does $(1+frac{1}{n})^n$ as $n toinfty = e$ mean the same thing as $(e^x)'$ = $e^x$
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I would like a proof as to why as the limit of $n$ approaches infinity, $(1+frac{1}{n})^n$ means the same thing as the derivative of $e^x$ = $e^x$.
I have tried proving this by converting $(e^x)'$ into the limit definition of e, and vice versa but keep ending up at a dead end.
I am a Precal BC student, so I do not have much Calculus experience and would love an explanation that involves as little Calculus as possible.
By the way, here is the work that I have done so far:
$(e^x)'$ = $e^x$ $Rightarrow$ derivative formula = $lim_{h to 0} frac{f(x+h)- f(x)}{h}$ $Rightarrow$ plug it in $Rightarrow$ $lim_{h to 0} frac{e^{(x+h)} - e^x}{h}$ = $e^x Rightarrow lim_{h to 0} frac{e^x(e^h - 1)}{h}$ = $e^x$ $Rightarrow$ h = $frac{1}{n}$ $Rightarrow$ $n to infty$ $Rightarrow$ $lim_{n to infty}$ $frac{e^x(e^{(1/n)} - 1)}{frac{1}{n}}$ = $e^x$ $Rightarrow$ $lim_{n to infty} (e^{frac{1}{n}} - 1)n = 1$
This is the part where I get stuck. I am not supposed to transfer the limit over to the other side so I don't know what to do. Please help and thanks in advance!
algebra-precalculus exponential-function
edited Nov 24 at 13:33
user21820
38.2k541151
asked Nov 22 at 22:36
Freedom Eagle
162
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I would like a proof as to why as the limit of $n$ approaches infinity, $(1+frac{1}{n})^n$ means the same thing as the derivative of $e^x$ = $e^x$.
I have tried proving this by converting $(e^x)'$ into the limit definition of e, and vice versa but keep ending up at a dead end.
I am a Precal BC student, so I do not have much Calculus experience and would love an explanation that involves as little Calculus as possible.
By the way, here is the work that I have done so far:
$(e^x)'$ = $e^x$ $Rightarrow$ derivative formula = $lim_{h to 0} frac{f(x+h)- f(x)}{h}$ $Rightarrow$ plug it in $Rightarrow$ $lim_{h to 0} frac{e^{(x+h)} - e^x}{h}$ = $e^x Rightarrow lim_{h to 0} frac{e^x(e^h - 1)}{h}$ = $e^x$ $Rightarrow$ h = $frac{1}{n}$ $Rightarrow$ $n to infty$ $Rightarrow$ $lim_{n to infty}$ $frac{e^x(e^{(1/n)} - 1)}{frac{1}{n}}$ = $e^x$ $Rightarrow$ $lim_{n to infty} (e^{frac{1}{n}} - 1)n = 1$
This is the part where I get stuck. I am not supposed to transfer the limit over to the other side so I don't know what to do. Please help and thanks in advance!
algebra-precalculus exponential-function
edited Nov 24 at 13:33
user21820
38.2k541151
asked Nov 22 at 22:36
Freedom Eagle
162
2
The limit is simply $e$ (without any derivative or exponent). You should maybe say what your definition of $e$ is since some people would define it exactly that way.
– 0x539
Nov 22 at 22:38
1
A lot of people use this limit as the definition of $e$. We can prove that it's equivalent to other definitions and find the decimal approximation to the number with it
– Yuriy S
Nov 22 at 22:39
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2067849/…
– amWhy
Nov 22 at 22:51
You should clarify what exactly you are looking for. Are you aware that $(1+frac{1}{n})^nto e$? Whay are you referring to $e^x$?
– gimusi
Nov 22 at 22:59
@gimusi That sort of clarification ought to be sought, and obtained, before jumping the gun to answer.
– amWhy
Nov 22 at 23:02
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I would like a proof as to why as the limit of $n$ approaches infinity, $(1+frac{1}{n})^n$ means the same thing as the derivative of $e^x$ = $e^x$.
I have tried proving this by converting $(e^x)'$ into the limit definition of e, and vice versa but keep ending up at a dead end.
I am a Precal BC student, so I do not have much Calculus experience and would love an explanation that involves as little Calculus as possible.
By the way, here is the work that I have done so far:
$(e^x)'$ = $e^x$ $Rightarrow$ derivative formula = $lim_{h to 0} frac{f(x+h)- f(x)}{h}$ $Rightarrow$ plug it in $Rightarrow$ $lim_{h to 0} frac{e^{(x+h)} - e^x}{h}$ = $e^x Rightarrow lim_{h to 0} frac{e^x(e^h - 1)}{h}$ = $e^x$ $Rightarrow$ h = $frac{1}{n}$ $Rightarrow$ $n to infty$ $Rightarrow$ $lim_{n to infty}$ $frac{e^x(e^{(1/n)} - 1)}{frac{1}{n}}$ = $e^x$ $Rightarrow$ $lim_{n to infty} (e^{frac{1}{n}} - 1)n = 1$
This is the part where I get stuck. I am not supposed to transfer the limit over to the other side so I don't know what to do. Please help and thanks in advance!
algebra-precalculus exponential-function
edited Nov 24 at 13:33
user21820
38.2k541151
asked Nov 22 at 22:36
Freedom Eagle
162
I would like a proof as to why as the limit of $n$ approaches infinity, $(1+frac{1}{n})^n$ means the same thing as the derivative of $e^x$ = $e^x$.
I have tried proving this by converting $(e^x)'$ into the limit definition of e, and vice versa but keep ending up at a dead end.
I am a Precal BC student, so I do not have much Calculus experience and would love an explanation that involves as little Calculus as possible.
By the way, here is the work that I have done so far:
$(e^x)'$ = $e^x$ $Rightarrow$ derivative formula = $lim_{h to 0} frac{f(x+h)- f(x)}{h}$ $Rightarrow$ plug it in $Rightarrow$ $lim_{h to 0} frac{e^{(x+h)} - e^x}{h}$ = $e^x Rightarrow lim_{h to 0} frac{e^x(e^h - 1)}{h}$ = $e^x$ $Rightarrow$ h = $frac{1}{n}$ $Rightarrow$ $n to infty$ $Rightarrow$ $lim_{n to infty}$ $frac{e^x(e^{(1/n)} - 1)}{frac{1}{n}}$ = $e^x$ $Rightarrow$ $lim_{n to infty} (e^{frac{1}{n}} - 1)n = 1$
This is the part where I get stuck. I am not supposed to transfer the limit over to the other side so I don't know what to do. Please help and thanks in advance!
algebra-precalculus exponential-function
algebra-precalculus exponential-function
edited Nov 24 at 13:33
user21820
38.2k541151
asked Nov 22 at 22:36
Freedom Eagle
162
edited Nov 24 at 13:33
user21820
38.2k541151
asked Nov 22 at 22:36
Freedom Eagle
162
edited Nov 24 at 13:33
user21820
38.2k541151
edited Nov 24 at 13:33
user21820
38.2k541151
edited Nov 24 at 13:33
user21820
38.2k541151
38.2k541151
asked Nov 22 at 22:36
Freedom Eagle
162
asked Nov 22 at 22:36
Freedom Eagle
162
asked Nov 22 at 22:36
Freedom Eagle
162
162
2
The limit is simply $e$ (without any derivative or exponent). You should maybe say what your definition of $e$ is since some people would define it exactly that way.
– 0x539
Nov 22 at 22:38
1
A lot of people use this limit as the definition of $e$. We can prove that it's equivalent to other definitions and find the decimal approximation to the number with it
– Yuriy S
Nov 22 at 22:39
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2067849/…
– amWhy
Nov 22 at 22:51
You should clarify what exactly you are looking for. Are you aware that $(1+frac{1}{n})^nto e$? Whay are you referring to $e^x$?
– gimusi
Nov 22 at 22:59
@gimusi That sort of clarification ought to be sought, and obtained, before jumping the gun to answer.
– amWhy
Nov 22 at 23:02
|
show 8 more comments
2
The limit is simply $e$ (without any derivative or exponent). You should maybe say what your definition of $e$ is since some people would define it exactly that way.
– 0x539
Nov 22 at 22:38
1
A lot of people use this limit as the definition of $e$. We can prove that it's equivalent to other definitions and find the decimal approximation to the number with it
– Yuriy S
Nov 22 at 22:39
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2067849/…
– amWhy
Nov 22 at 22:51
You should clarify what exactly you are looking for. Are you aware that $(1+frac{1}{n})^nto e$? Whay are you referring to $e^x$?
– gimusi
Nov 22 at 22:59
@gimusi That sort of clarification ought to be sought, and obtained, before jumping the gun to answer.
– amWhy
Nov 22 at 23:02
2
2
The limit is simply $e$ (without any derivative or exponent). You should maybe say what your definition of $e$ is since some people would define it exactly that way.
– 0x539
Nov 22 at 22:38
The limit is simply $e$ (without any derivative or exponent). You should maybe say what your definition of $e$ is since some people would define it exactly that way.
– 0x539
Nov 22 at 22:38
1
1
A lot of people use this limit as the definition of $e$. We can prove that it's equivalent to other definitions and find the decimal approximation to the number with it
– Yuriy S
Nov 22 at 22:39
A lot of people use this limit as the definition of $e$. We can prove that it's equivalent to other definitions and find the decimal approximation to the number with it
– Yuriy S
Nov 22 at 22:39
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2067849/…
– amWhy
Nov 22 at 22:51
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2067849/…
– amWhy
Nov 22 at 22:51
You should clarify what exactly you are looking for. Are you aware that $(1+frac{1}{n})^nto e$? Whay are you referring to $e^x$?
– gimusi
Nov 22 at 22:59
You should clarify what exactly you are looking for. Are you aware that $(1+frac{1}{n})^nto e$? Whay are you referring to $e^x$?
– gimusi
Nov 22 at 22:59
@gimusi That sort of clarification ought to be sought, and obtained, before jumping the gun to answer.
– amWhy
Nov 22 at 23:02
@gimusi That sort of clarification ought to be sought, and obtained, before jumping the gun to answer.
– amWhy
Nov 22 at 23:02
|
show 8 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
That limit expression gives the number $e$ itself: for $e^x$ it's
$$lim_{nrightarrowinfty}left(1+frac{x}{n}right)^n .$$
if you differentiate this, you get a $1/n$ from inside - the coefficient of $x$; and a $n$ from the exponent, which cancel out. You are left with $n-1$ as the exponent ... but this makes no difference in the limit as $nrightarrowinfty$ ... infact you could take that limit formula & add any finite real number to either occurence of $n$ in it,
$$lim_{nrightarrowinfty}left(1+frac{x}{n+mu}right)^{n+nu} ,$$
& it would make no essential difference to it, because of $n$ tending to $infty$.
answered Nov 24 at 15:43
AmbretteOrrisey
49110
How would the expression of $e^x$ be lim n→∞ $(1+/frac{x}{n})^n$ rather than it being $(1+/frac{1}{n})^xn$? And, by the way, how did you get your limit sign to look like that?
– Freedom Eagle
Nov 25 at 0:31
Really sorry for the formatting issues. What I meant to ask was how the expression of $e^x$ be lim n→∞ $(1+frac{x}{n})^n$ rather than it being $(1+frac{1}{n})^{xn}$?
– Freedom Eagle
Nov 25 at 0:52
It pans out equivalent - precisely because of the limiting process. Observe how it's equivalent to $$lim_{frac{n}{x}rightarrowinfty}left(1+frac{x}{n}right)^{xfrac{n}{x}}$$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Nov 25 at 10:34
The letting $nrightarrowinfty$ allows various strangelooking 'liberties' to be taken ... like that substitution of $mu$ & $nu$ that I did. And you'll see I've answered your other question!
– AmbretteOrrisey
Nov 25 at 10:38
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009764%2fwhy-does-1-frac1nn-as-n-to-infty-e-mean-the-same-thing-as-ex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
That limit expression gives the number $e$ itself: for $e^x$ it's
$$lim_{nrightarrowinfty}left(1+frac{x}{n}right)^n .$$
if you differentiate this, you get a $1/n$ from inside - the coefficient of $x$; and a $n$ from the exponent, which cancel out. You are left with $n-1$ as the exponent ... but this makes no difference in the limit as $nrightarrowinfty$ ... infact you could take that limit formula & add any finite real number to either occurence of $n$ in it,
$$lim_{nrightarrowinfty}left(1+frac{x}{n+mu}right)^{n+nu} ,$$
& it would make no essential difference to it, because of $n$ tending to $infty$.
answered Nov 24 at 15:43
AmbretteOrrisey
49110
How would the expression of $e^x$ be lim n→∞ $(1+/frac{x}{n})^n$ rather than it being $(1+/frac{1}{n})^xn$? And, by the way, how did you get your limit sign to look like that?
– Freedom Eagle
Nov 25 at 0:31
Really sorry for the formatting issues. What I meant to ask was how the expression of $e^x$ be lim n→∞ $(1+frac{x}{n})^n$ rather than it being $(1+frac{1}{n})^{xn}$?
– Freedom Eagle
Nov 25 at 0:52
It pans out equivalent - precisely because of the limiting process. Observe how it's equivalent to $$lim_{frac{n}{x}rightarrowinfty}left(1+frac{x}{n}right)^{xfrac{n}{x}}$$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Nov 25 at 10:34
The letting $nrightarrowinfty$ allows various strangelooking 'liberties' to be taken ... like that substitution of $mu$ & $nu$ that I did. And you'll see I've answered your other question!
– AmbretteOrrisey
Nov 25 at 10:38
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
That limit expression gives the number $e$ itself: for $e^x$ it's
$$lim_{nrightarrowinfty}left(1+frac{x}{n}right)^n .$$
if you differentiate this, you get a $1/n$ from inside - the coefficient of $x$; and a $n$ from the exponent, which cancel out. You are left with $n-1$ as the exponent ... but this makes no difference in the limit as $nrightarrowinfty$ ... infact you could take that limit formula & add any finite real number to either occurence of $n$ in it,
$$lim_{nrightarrowinfty}left(1+frac{x}{n+mu}right)^{n+nu} ,$$
& it would make no essential difference to it, because of $n$ tending to $infty$.
answered Nov 24 at 15:43
AmbretteOrrisey
49110
How would the expression of $e^x$ be lim n→∞ $(1+/frac{x}{n})^n$ rather than it being $(1+/frac{1}{n})^xn$? And, by the way, how did you get your limit sign to look like that?
– Freedom Eagle
Nov 25 at 0:31
Really sorry for the formatting issues. What I meant to ask was how the expression of $e^x$ be lim n→∞ $(1+frac{x}{n})^n$ rather than it being $(1+frac{1}{n})^{xn}$?
– Freedom Eagle
Nov 25 at 0:52
It pans out equivalent - precisely because of the limiting process. Observe how it's equivalent to $$lim_{frac{n}{x}rightarrowinfty}left(1+frac{x}{n}right)^{xfrac{n}{x}}$$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Nov 25 at 10:34
The letting $nrightarrowinfty$ allows various strangelooking 'liberties' to be taken ... like that substitution of $mu$ & $nu$ that I did. And you'll see I've answered your other question!
– AmbretteOrrisey
Nov 25 at 10:38
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
That limit expression gives the number $e$ itself: for $e^x$ it's
$$lim_{nrightarrowinfty}left(1+frac{x}{n}right)^n .$$
if you differentiate this, you get a $1/n$ from inside - the coefficient of $x$; and a $n$ from the exponent, which cancel out. You are left with $n-1$ as the exponent ... but this makes no difference in the limit as $nrightarrowinfty$ ... infact you could take that limit formula & add any finite real number to either occurence of $n$ in it,
$$lim_{nrightarrowinfty}left(1+frac{x}{n+mu}right)^{n+nu} ,$$
& it would make no essential difference to it, because of $n$ tending to $infty$.
answered Nov 24 at 15:43
AmbretteOrrisey
49110
That limit expression gives the number $e$ itself: for $e^x$ it's
$$lim_{nrightarrowinfty}left(1+frac{x}{n}right)^n .$$
if you differentiate this, you get a $1/n$ from inside - the coefficient of $x$; and a $n$ from the exponent, which cancel out. You are left with $n-1$ as the exponent ... but this makes no difference in the limit as $nrightarrowinfty$ ... infact you could take that limit formula & add any finite real number to either occurence of $n$ in it,
$$lim_{nrightarrowinfty}left(1+frac{x}{n+mu}right)^{n+nu} ,$$
& it would make no essential difference to it, because of $n$ tending to $infty$.
answered Nov 24 at 15:43
AmbretteOrrisey
49110
answered Nov 24 at 15:43
AmbretteOrrisey
49110
answered Nov 24 at 15:43
AmbretteOrrisey
49110
answered Nov 24 at 15:43
AmbretteOrrisey
49110
49110
How would the expression of $e^x$ be lim n→∞ $(1+/frac{x}{n})^n$ rather than it being $(1+/frac{1}{n})^xn$? And, by the way, how did you get your limit sign to look like that?
– Freedom Eagle
Nov 25 at 0:31
Really sorry for the formatting issues. What I meant to ask was how the expression of $e^x$ be lim n→∞ $(1+frac{x}{n})^n$ rather than it being $(1+frac{1}{n})^{xn}$?
– Freedom Eagle
Nov 25 at 0:52
It pans out equivalent - precisely because of the limiting process. Observe how it's equivalent to $$lim_{frac{n}{x}rightarrowinfty}left(1+frac{x}{n}right)^{xfrac{n}{x}}$$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Nov 25 at 10:34
The letting $nrightarrowinfty$ allows various strangelooking 'liberties' to be taken ... like that substitution of $mu$ & $nu$ that I did. And you'll see I've answered your other question!
– AmbretteOrrisey
Nov 25 at 10:38
add a comment |
How would the expression of $e^x$ be lim n→∞ $(1+/frac{x}{n})^n$ rather than it being $(1+/frac{1}{n})^xn$? And, by the way, how did you get your limit sign to look like that?
– Freedom Eagle
Nov 25 at 0:31
Really sorry for the formatting issues. What I meant to ask was how the expression of $e^x$ be lim n→∞ $(1+frac{x}{n})^n$ rather than it being $(1+frac{1}{n})^{xn}$?
– Freedom Eagle
Nov 25 at 0:52
It pans out equivalent - precisely because of the limiting process. Observe how it's equivalent to $$lim_{frac{n}{x}rightarrowinfty}left(1+frac{x}{n}right)^{xfrac{n}{x}}$$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Nov 25 at 10:34
The letting $nrightarrowinfty$ allows various strangelooking 'liberties' to be taken ... like that substitution of $mu$ & $nu$ that I did. And you'll see I've answered your other question!
– AmbretteOrrisey
Nov 25 at 10:38
How would the expression of $e^x$ be lim n→∞ $(1+/frac{x}{n})^n$ rather than it being $(1+/frac{1}{n})^xn$? And, by the way, how did you get your limit sign to look like that?
– Freedom Eagle
Nov 25 at 0:31
How would the expression of $e^x$ be lim n→∞ $(1+/frac{x}{n})^n$ rather than it being $(1+/frac{1}{n})^xn$? And, by the way, how did you get your limit sign to look like that?
– Freedom Eagle
Nov 25 at 0:31
Really sorry for the formatting issues. What I meant to ask was how the expression of $e^x$ be lim n→∞ $(1+frac{x}{n})^n$ rather than it being $(1+frac{1}{n})^{xn}$?
– Freedom Eagle
Nov 25 at 0:52
Really sorry for the formatting issues. What I meant to ask was how the expression of $e^x$ be lim n→∞ $(1+frac{x}{n})^n$ rather than it being $(1+frac{1}{n})^{xn}$?
– Freedom Eagle
Nov 25 at 0:52
It pans out equivalent - precisely because of the limiting process. Observe how it's equivalent to $$lim_{frac{n}{x}rightarrowinfty}left(1+frac{x}{n}right)^{xfrac{n}{x}}$$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Nov 25 at 10:34
It pans out equivalent - precisely because of the limiting process. Observe how it's equivalent to $$lim_{frac{n}{x}rightarrowinfty}left(1+frac{x}{n}right)^{xfrac{n}{x}}$$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Nov 25 at 10:34
The letting $nrightarrowinfty$ allows various strangelooking 'liberties' to be taken ... like that substitution of $mu$ & $nu$ that I did. And you'll see I've answered your other question!
– AmbretteOrrisey
Nov 25 at 10:38
The letting $nrightarrowinfty$ allows various strangelooking 'liberties' to be taken ... like that substitution of $mu$ & $nu$ that I did. And you'll see I've answered your other question!
– AmbretteOrrisey
Nov 25 at 10:38
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009764%2fwhy-does-1-frac1nn-as-n-to-infty-e-mean-the-same-thing-as-ex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
The limit is simply $e$ (without any derivative or exponent). You should maybe say what your definition of $e$ is since some people would define it exactly that way.
– 0x539
Nov 22 at 22:38
1
A lot of people use this limit as the definition of $e$. We can prove that it's equivalent to other definitions and find the decimal approximation to the number with it
– Yuriy S
Nov 22 at 22:39
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2067849/…
– amWhy
Nov 22 at 22:51
You should clarify what exactly you are looking for. Are you aware that $(1+frac{1}{n})^nto e$? Whay are you referring to $e^x$?
– gimusi
Nov 22 at 22:59
@gimusi That sort of clarification ought to be sought, and obtained, before jumping the gun to answer.
– amWhy
Nov 22 at 23:02