Washer method confusion
Compute volume of solid created by revolving the area bounded by $y=sqrt x$, $y=0$ $x=1$, $x=4$, around the y axis.
I understand that I can find the volume by integration of the $A(y)$ from $0$ to $2$ since these are the $y$ values of the intercepts of $x=1$ and $x=4$.
My understanding is that I would compute the area $(A(y) $by:
$pi$ $(R^2)-r^2)$ where $R$ is the outer radius and $r$ is the inner radius. Then I integrate this as $int_0^2 A(y)dy$.
So, I compute the outer radius $R$ by calculating the $x$ distance from the right most boundary, in this case $x=4$ and the $y$ axis. Thus $R=4$. Is this the way to calculate $R$ even if part of the $R$ $x$ distance isn't inside the boundary?? Ugh,confused on the definition here.
The inner radius is the $x$ distance from the function to the axis of rotation (the $y$ axis). So, $r=y^2$.
But, it I would think that this x distance is ONLY within the region of $x=1$ and $x=4$. So, since I should always calculate from right to left, wouldn't this radius be $y^2-1$?? But seems like I am using the $R$ by NOT considering the area in the bounded region and I AM using the $r$ by considering the bonded region.
I cannot seem to understand this washer problem even though I can work others and I can see that I don't fully understand the definition of how to computer the inner and outer radii.
Can someone clarify? Bottom line is that I can't seem to be able to compute the inner and outer radii of this problem correctly.
calculus
add a comment |
Compute volume of solid created by revolving the area bounded by $y=sqrt x$, $y=0$ $x=1$, $x=4$, around the y axis.
I understand that I can find the volume by integration of the $A(y)$ from $0$ to $2$ since these are the $y$ values of the intercepts of $x=1$ and $x=4$.
My understanding is that I would compute the area $(A(y) $by:
$pi$ $(R^2)-r^2)$ where $R$ is the outer radius and $r$ is the inner radius. Then I integrate this as $int_0^2 A(y)dy$.
So, I compute the outer radius $R$ by calculating the $x$ distance from the right most boundary, in this case $x=4$ and the $y$ axis. Thus $R=4$. Is this the way to calculate $R$ even if part of the $R$ $x$ distance isn't inside the boundary?? Ugh,confused on the definition here.
The inner radius is the $x$ distance from the function to the axis of rotation (the $y$ axis). So, $r=y^2$.
But, it I would think that this x distance is ONLY within the region of $x=1$ and $x=4$. So, since I should always calculate from right to left, wouldn't this radius be $y^2-1$?? But seems like I am using the $R$ by NOT considering the area in the bounded region and I AM using the $r$ by considering the bonded region.
I cannot seem to understand this washer problem even though I can work others and I can see that I don't fully understand the definition of how to computer the inner and outer radii.
Can someone clarify? Bottom line is that I can't seem to be able to compute the inner and outer radii of this problem correctly.
calculus
add a comment |
Compute volume of solid created by revolving the area bounded by $y=sqrt x$, $y=0$ $x=1$, $x=4$, around the y axis.
I understand that I can find the volume by integration of the $A(y)$ from $0$ to $2$ since these are the $y$ values of the intercepts of $x=1$ and $x=4$.
My understanding is that I would compute the area $(A(y) $by:
$pi$ $(R^2)-r^2)$ where $R$ is the outer radius and $r$ is the inner radius. Then I integrate this as $int_0^2 A(y)dy$.
So, I compute the outer radius $R$ by calculating the $x$ distance from the right most boundary, in this case $x=4$ and the $y$ axis. Thus $R=4$. Is this the way to calculate $R$ even if part of the $R$ $x$ distance isn't inside the boundary?? Ugh,confused on the definition here.
The inner radius is the $x$ distance from the function to the axis of rotation (the $y$ axis). So, $r=y^2$.
But, it I would think that this x distance is ONLY within the region of $x=1$ and $x=4$. So, since I should always calculate from right to left, wouldn't this radius be $y^2-1$?? But seems like I am using the $R$ by NOT considering the area in the bounded region and I AM using the $r$ by considering the bonded region.
I cannot seem to understand this washer problem even though I can work others and I can see that I don't fully understand the definition of how to computer the inner and outer radii.
Can someone clarify? Bottom line is that I can't seem to be able to compute the inner and outer radii of this problem correctly.
calculus
Compute volume of solid created by revolving the area bounded by $y=sqrt x$, $y=0$ $x=1$, $x=4$, around the y axis.
I understand that I can find the volume by integration of the $A(y)$ from $0$ to $2$ since these are the $y$ values of the intercepts of $x=1$ and $x=4$.
My understanding is that I would compute the area $(A(y) $by:
$pi$ $(R^2)-r^2)$ where $R$ is the outer radius and $r$ is the inner radius. Then I integrate this as $int_0^2 A(y)dy$.
So, I compute the outer radius $R$ by calculating the $x$ distance from the right most boundary, in this case $x=4$ and the $y$ axis. Thus $R=4$. Is this the way to calculate $R$ even if part of the $R$ $x$ distance isn't inside the boundary?? Ugh,confused on the definition here.
The inner radius is the $x$ distance from the function to the axis of rotation (the $y$ axis). So, $r=y^2$.
But, it I would think that this x distance is ONLY within the region of $x=1$ and $x=4$. So, since I should always calculate from right to left, wouldn't this radius be $y^2-1$?? But seems like I am using the $R$ by NOT considering the area in the bounded region and I AM using the $r$ by considering the bonded region.
I cannot seem to understand this washer problem even though I can work others and I can see that I don't fully understand the definition of how to computer the inner and outer radii.
Can someone clarify? Bottom line is that I can't seem to be able to compute the inner and outer radii of this problem correctly.
calculus
calculus
asked 4 hours ago
user163862
84821016
84821016
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Cross section
Shell method
$$V = intlimits_{r=1}^4 2 pi r sqrt{r} dr = frac{124 pi }{5}$$
Washer method
$$V = intlimits_{z=0}^1 pi (4^2 - 1^2) dz + intlimits_{z=1}^2 pi (4^2 - z^2) dz = frac{124 pi }{5}$$
The calculation at the bottom looks like some kind of unholy hybrid between washers and shells. Which is it supposed to be?
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
These are shells.
– David G. Stork
3 hours ago
1
Then it should be $2pi r$ rather than $pi(r^2-1^2)$, namely the circumrefence of the shell at radius $r$.
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
Yep (+1)... thanks..
– David G. Stork
3 hours ago
Then I only take issue with your value for the definite integral. It looks like you may have forgotten to take an antiderivative ... or something worse. (The volume of the entire circumscribed cylinder is only $32pi$).
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
First, draw a diagram. This step is mandatory and to be skipped only if you have a clear mental picture of how it will look without drawing it.
Since we're rotating about the $y$-axis the washers are horizontal sections through the shaded areas -- and the radius is just the $x$ coordinate of each point in the figure. We can see on the diagram that the range of relevant $y$s is $[0,2]$, and the inner and outer radiuses will be:
$$ {rm inner}(y) = begin{cases} 1 & text{for }0le y le 1 \ y^2 & text{for } 1 le y le 2 end{cases} qquad qquad {rm outer}(y) = 4 $$
Can you take it from here?
By the way, the shape of the area suggests it would be much easier to compute with the shell method. You wouldn't need any piecewise defined functions and could do everything in one integral.
I did draw an image similar to yours. I got similar values for inner and outer radii and could NOT get the text answer which is 124pi/5.
– user163862
3 hours ago
Can you assist me in understanding why there are 2 inner radii?
– user163862
2 hours ago
@user163862: The left side of the shaded area consists of a straight line from $(1,0)$ to $(1,1)$, and the part of the parabola between $(1,1)$ and $(4,2)$. The sharp bend in this inside edge corresponds to the switch between expressions.
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
add a comment |
The inner radius would be $1$ for $0leq y<1$ and $y^2$ for $1leq yleq2$.
The outer radius would be 4 for $0leq yleq2$
Then, the set up for the volume would be
$$V=piint_{0}^{1}(4^2-1^2)~dy+piint_{1}^{2}(4^2-y^4)~dy=frac{124pi}{5}$$
How on earth do you get those radiuses?
– Henning Makholm
4 hours ago
I used the graph of $x=y^2$. Since the area is bounded between x=4 and x=1, I think the outer radius should be $4-y^2$, and the inner radius should be $1-y^2$. Did I do anything wrong?
– Larry
4 hours ago
I'm still quite baffled where you're measuring those radii. Are you imagining we're you're rotating about the line $x=4$? No, that doesn't make sense either. Perhaps you could draw a diagram to show more precisely where you get those distances from?
– Henning Makholm
4 hours ago
I think I made a mistake, I'll edit my answer.
– Larry
4 hours ago
1
x @Larry: Um ... I can see what you're doing now, but it is quite wrong. "Radius" means distance from the axis of revolution, and the axis of revolution is the y-axis, not the red parabola! How would you rotate something about a curved axis anyway?
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055421%2fwasher-method-confusion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Cross section
Shell method
$$V = intlimits_{r=1}^4 2 pi r sqrt{r} dr = frac{124 pi }{5}$$
Washer method
$$V = intlimits_{z=0}^1 pi (4^2 - 1^2) dz + intlimits_{z=1}^2 pi (4^2 - z^2) dz = frac{124 pi }{5}$$
The calculation at the bottom looks like some kind of unholy hybrid between washers and shells. Which is it supposed to be?
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
These are shells.
– David G. Stork
3 hours ago
1
Then it should be $2pi r$ rather than $pi(r^2-1^2)$, namely the circumrefence of the shell at radius $r$.
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
Yep (+1)... thanks..
– David G. Stork
3 hours ago
Then I only take issue with your value for the definite integral. It looks like you may have forgotten to take an antiderivative ... or something worse. (The volume of the entire circumscribed cylinder is only $32pi$).
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
Cross section
Shell method
$$V = intlimits_{r=1}^4 2 pi r sqrt{r} dr = frac{124 pi }{5}$$
Washer method
$$V = intlimits_{z=0}^1 pi (4^2 - 1^2) dz + intlimits_{z=1}^2 pi (4^2 - z^2) dz = frac{124 pi }{5}$$
The calculation at the bottom looks like some kind of unholy hybrid between washers and shells. Which is it supposed to be?
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
These are shells.
– David G. Stork
3 hours ago
1
Then it should be $2pi r$ rather than $pi(r^2-1^2)$, namely the circumrefence of the shell at radius $r$.
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
Yep (+1)... thanks..
– David G. Stork
3 hours ago
Then I only take issue with your value for the definite integral. It looks like you may have forgotten to take an antiderivative ... or something worse. (The volume of the entire circumscribed cylinder is only $32pi$).
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
Cross section
Shell method
$$V = intlimits_{r=1}^4 2 pi r sqrt{r} dr = frac{124 pi }{5}$$
Washer method
$$V = intlimits_{z=0}^1 pi (4^2 - 1^2) dz + intlimits_{z=1}^2 pi (4^2 - z^2) dz = frac{124 pi }{5}$$
Cross section
Shell method
$$V = intlimits_{r=1}^4 2 pi r sqrt{r} dr = frac{124 pi }{5}$$
Washer method
$$V = intlimits_{z=0}^1 pi (4^2 - 1^2) dz + intlimits_{z=1}^2 pi (4^2 - z^2) dz = frac{124 pi }{5}$$
edited 3 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
David G. Stork
9,74921232
9,74921232
The calculation at the bottom looks like some kind of unholy hybrid between washers and shells. Which is it supposed to be?
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
These are shells.
– David G. Stork
3 hours ago
1
Then it should be $2pi r$ rather than $pi(r^2-1^2)$, namely the circumrefence of the shell at radius $r$.
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
Yep (+1)... thanks..
– David G. Stork
3 hours ago
Then I only take issue with your value for the definite integral. It looks like you may have forgotten to take an antiderivative ... or something worse. (The volume of the entire circumscribed cylinder is only $32pi$).
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
The calculation at the bottom looks like some kind of unholy hybrid between washers and shells. Which is it supposed to be?
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
These are shells.
– David G. Stork
3 hours ago
1
Then it should be $2pi r$ rather than $pi(r^2-1^2)$, namely the circumrefence of the shell at radius $r$.
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
Yep (+1)... thanks..
– David G. Stork
3 hours ago
Then I only take issue with your value for the definite integral. It looks like you may have forgotten to take an antiderivative ... or something worse. (The volume of the entire circumscribed cylinder is only $32pi$).
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
The calculation at the bottom looks like some kind of unholy hybrid between washers and shells. Which is it supposed to be?
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
The calculation at the bottom looks like some kind of unholy hybrid between washers and shells. Which is it supposed to be?
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
These are shells.
– David G. Stork
3 hours ago
These are shells.
– David G. Stork
3 hours ago
1
1
Then it should be $2pi r$ rather than $pi(r^2-1^2)$, namely the circumrefence of the shell at radius $r$.
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
Then it should be $2pi r$ rather than $pi(r^2-1^2)$, namely the circumrefence of the shell at radius $r$.
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
Yep (+1)... thanks..
– David G. Stork
3 hours ago
Yep (+1)... thanks..
– David G. Stork
3 hours ago
Then I only take issue with your value for the definite integral. It looks like you may have forgotten to take an antiderivative ... or something worse. (The volume of the entire circumscribed cylinder is only $32pi$).
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
Then I only take issue with your value for the definite integral. It looks like you may have forgotten to take an antiderivative ... or something worse. (The volume of the entire circumscribed cylinder is only $32pi$).
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
First, draw a diagram. This step is mandatory and to be skipped only if you have a clear mental picture of how it will look without drawing it.
Since we're rotating about the $y$-axis the washers are horizontal sections through the shaded areas -- and the radius is just the $x$ coordinate of each point in the figure. We can see on the diagram that the range of relevant $y$s is $[0,2]$, and the inner and outer radiuses will be:
$$ {rm inner}(y) = begin{cases} 1 & text{for }0le y le 1 \ y^2 & text{for } 1 le y le 2 end{cases} qquad qquad {rm outer}(y) = 4 $$
Can you take it from here?
By the way, the shape of the area suggests it would be much easier to compute with the shell method. You wouldn't need any piecewise defined functions and could do everything in one integral.
I did draw an image similar to yours. I got similar values for inner and outer radii and could NOT get the text answer which is 124pi/5.
– user163862
3 hours ago
Can you assist me in understanding why there are 2 inner radii?
– user163862
2 hours ago
@user163862: The left side of the shaded area consists of a straight line from $(1,0)$ to $(1,1)$, and the part of the parabola between $(1,1)$ and $(4,2)$. The sharp bend in this inside edge corresponds to the switch between expressions.
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
add a comment |
First, draw a diagram. This step is mandatory and to be skipped only if you have a clear mental picture of how it will look without drawing it.
Since we're rotating about the $y$-axis the washers are horizontal sections through the shaded areas -- and the radius is just the $x$ coordinate of each point in the figure. We can see on the diagram that the range of relevant $y$s is $[0,2]$, and the inner and outer radiuses will be:
$$ {rm inner}(y) = begin{cases} 1 & text{for }0le y le 1 \ y^2 & text{for } 1 le y le 2 end{cases} qquad qquad {rm outer}(y) = 4 $$
Can you take it from here?
By the way, the shape of the area suggests it would be much easier to compute with the shell method. You wouldn't need any piecewise defined functions and could do everything in one integral.
I did draw an image similar to yours. I got similar values for inner and outer radii and could NOT get the text answer which is 124pi/5.
– user163862
3 hours ago
Can you assist me in understanding why there are 2 inner radii?
– user163862
2 hours ago
@user163862: The left side of the shaded area consists of a straight line from $(1,0)$ to $(1,1)$, and the part of the parabola between $(1,1)$ and $(4,2)$. The sharp bend in this inside edge corresponds to the switch between expressions.
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
add a comment |
First, draw a diagram. This step is mandatory and to be skipped only if you have a clear mental picture of how it will look without drawing it.
Since we're rotating about the $y$-axis the washers are horizontal sections through the shaded areas -- and the radius is just the $x$ coordinate of each point in the figure. We can see on the diagram that the range of relevant $y$s is $[0,2]$, and the inner and outer radiuses will be:
$$ {rm inner}(y) = begin{cases} 1 & text{for }0le y le 1 \ y^2 & text{for } 1 le y le 2 end{cases} qquad qquad {rm outer}(y) = 4 $$
Can you take it from here?
By the way, the shape of the area suggests it would be much easier to compute with the shell method. You wouldn't need any piecewise defined functions and could do everything in one integral.
First, draw a diagram. This step is mandatory and to be skipped only if you have a clear mental picture of how it will look without drawing it.
Since we're rotating about the $y$-axis the washers are horizontal sections through the shaded areas -- and the radius is just the $x$ coordinate of each point in the figure. We can see on the diagram that the range of relevant $y$s is $[0,2]$, and the inner and outer radiuses will be:
$$ {rm inner}(y) = begin{cases} 1 & text{for }0le y le 1 \ y^2 & text{for } 1 le y le 2 end{cases} qquad qquad {rm outer}(y) = 4 $$
Can you take it from here?
By the way, the shape of the area suggests it would be much easier to compute with the shell method. You wouldn't need any piecewise defined functions and could do everything in one integral.
edited 4 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
Henning Makholm
237k16302537
237k16302537
I did draw an image similar to yours. I got similar values for inner and outer radii and could NOT get the text answer which is 124pi/5.
– user163862
3 hours ago
Can you assist me in understanding why there are 2 inner radii?
– user163862
2 hours ago
@user163862: The left side of the shaded area consists of a straight line from $(1,0)$ to $(1,1)$, and the part of the parabola between $(1,1)$ and $(4,2)$. The sharp bend in this inside edge corresponds to the switch between expressions.
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I did draw an image similar to yours. I got similar values for inner and outer radii and could NOT get the text answer which is 124pi/5.
– user163862
3 hours ago
Can you assist me in understanding why there are 2 inner radii?
– user163862
2 hours ago
@user163862: The left side of the shaded area consists of a straight line from $(1,0)$ to $(1,1)$, and the part of the parabola between $(1,1)$ and $(4,2)$. The sharp bend in this inside edge corresponds to the switch between expressions.
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
I did draw an image similar to yours. I got similar values for inner and outer radii and could NOT get the text answer which is 124pi/5.
– user163862
3 hours ago
I did draw an image similar to yours. I got similar values for inner and outer radii and could NOT get the text answer which is 124pi/5.
– user163862
3 hours ago
Can you assist me in understanding why there are 2 inner radii?
– user163862
2 hours ago
Can you assist me in understanding why there are 2 inner radii?
– user163862
2 hours ago
@user163862: The left side of the shaded area consists of a straight line from $(1,0)$ to $(1,1)$, and the part of the parabola between $(1,1)$ and $(4,2)$. The sharp bend in this inside edge corresponds to the switch between expressions.
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
@user163862: The left side of the shaded area consists of a straight line from $(1,0)$ to $(1,1)$, and the part of the parabola between $(1,1)$ and $(4,2)$. The sharp bend in this inside edge corresponds to the switch between expressions.
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
add a comment |
The inner radius would be $1$ for $0leq y<1$ and $y^2$ for $1leq yleq2$.
The outer radius would be 4 for $0leq yleq2$
Then, the set up for the volume would be
$$V=piint_{0}^{1}(4^2-1^2)~dy+piint_{1}^{2}(4^2-y^4)~dy=frac{124pi}{5}$$
How on earth do you get those radiuses?
– Henning Makholm
4 hours ago
I used the graph of $x=y^2$. Since the area is bounded between x=4 and x=1, I think the outer radius should be $4-y^2$, and the inner radius should be $1-y^2$. Did I do anything wrong?
– Larry
4 hours ago
I'm still quite baffled where you're measuring those radii. Are you imagining we're you're rotating about the line $x=4$? No, that doesn't make sense either. Perhaps you could draw a diagram to show more precisely where you get those distances from?
– Henning Makholm
4 hours ago
I think I made a mistake, I'll edit my answer.
– Larry
4 hours ago
1
x @Larry: Um ... I can see what you're doing now, but it is quite wrong. "Radius" means distance from the axis of revolution, and the axis of revolution is the y-axis, not the red parabola! How would you rotate something about a curved axis anyway?
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
The inner radius would be $1$ for $0leq y<1$ and $y^2$ for $1leq yleq2$.
The outer radius would be 4 for $0leq yleq2$
Then, the set up for the volume would be
$$V=piint_{0}^{1}(4^2-1^2)~dy+piint_{1}^{2}(4^2-y^4)~dy=frac{124pi}{5}$$
How on earth do you get those radiuses?
– Henning Makholm
4 hours ago
I used the graph of $x=y^2$. Since the area is bounded between x=4 and x=1, I think the outer radius should be $4-y^2$, and the inner radius should be $1-y^2$. Did I do anything wrong?
– Larry
4 hours ago
I'm still quite baffled where you're measuring those radii. Are you imagining we're you're rotating about the line $x=4$? No, that doesn't make sense either. Perhaps you could draw a diagram to show more precisely where you get those distances from?
– Henning Makholm
4 hours ago
I think I made a mistake, I'll edit my answer.
– Larry
4 hours ago
1
x @Larry: Um ... I can see what you're doing now, but it is quite wrong. "Radius" means distance from the axis of revolution, and the axis of revolution is the y-axis, not the red parabola! How would you rotate something about a curved axis anyway?
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
The inner radius would be $1$ for $0leq y<1$ and $y^2$ for $1leq yleq2$.
The outer radius would be 4 for $0leq yleq2$
Then, the set up for the volume would be
$$V=piint_{0}^{1}(4^2-1^2)~dy+piint_{1}^{2}(4^2-y^4)~dy=frac{124pi}{5}$$
The inner radius would be $1$ for $0leq y<1$ and $y^2$ for $1leq yleq2$.
The outer radius would be 4 for $0leq yleq2$
Then, the set up for the volume would be
$$V=piint_{0}^{1}(4^2-1^2)~dy+piint_{1}^{2}(4^2-y^4)~dy=frac{124pi}{5}$$
edited 3 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
Larry
1,6122722
1,6122722
How on earth do you get those radiuses?
– Henning Makholm
4 hours ago
I used the graph of $x=y^2$. Since the area is bounded between x=4 and x=1, I think the outer radius should be $4-y^2$, and the inner radius should be $1-y^2$. Did I do anything wrong?
– Larry
4 hours ago
I'm still quite baffled where you're measuring those radii. Are you imagining we're you're rotating about the line $x=4$? No, that doesn't make sense either. Perhaps you could draw a diagram to show more precisely where you get those distances from?
– Henning Makholm
4 hours ago
I think I made a mistake, I'll edit my answer.
– Larry
4 hours ago
1
x @Larry: Um ... I can see what you're doing now, but it is quite wrong. "Radius" means distance from the axis of revolution, and the axis of revolution is the y-axis, not the red parabola! How would you rotate something about a curved axis anyway?
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
How on earth do you get those radiuses?
– Henning Makholm
4 hours ago
I used the graph of $x=y^2$. Since the area is bounded between x=4 and x=1, I think the outer radius should be $4-y^2$, and the inner radius should be $1-y^2$. Did I do anything wrong?
– Larry
4 hours ago
I'm still quite baffled where you're measuring those radii. Are you imagining we're you're rotating about the line $x=4$? No, that doesn't make sense either. Perhaps you could draw a diagram to show more precisely where you get those distances from?
– Henning Makholm
4 hours ago
I think I made a mistake, I'll edit my answer.
– Larry
4 hours ago
1
x @Larry: Um ... I can see what you're doing now, but it is quite wrong. "Radius" means distance from the axis of revolution, and the axis of revolution is the y-axis, not the red parabola! How would you rotate something about a curved axis anyway?
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
How on earth do you get those radiuses?
– Henning Makholm
4 hours ago
How on earth do you get those radiuses?
– Henning Makholm
4 hours ago
I used the graph of $x=y^2$. Since the area is bounded between x=4 and x=1, I think the outer radius should be $4-y^2$, and the inner radius should be $1-y^2$. Did I do anything wrong?
– Larry
4 hours ago
I used the graph of $x=y^2$. Since the area is bounded between x=4 and x=1, I think the outer radius should be $4-y^2$, and the inner radius should be $1-y^2$. Did I do anything wrong?
– Larry
4 hours ago
I'm still quite baffled where you're measuring those radii. Are you imagining we're you're rotating about the line $x=4$? No, that doesn't make sense either. Perhaps you could draw a diagram to show more precisely where you get those distances from?
– Henning Makholm
4 hours ago
I'm still quite baffled where you're measuring those radii. Are you imagining we're you're rotating about the line $x=4$? No, that doesn't make sense either. Perhaps you could draw a diagram to show more precisely where you get those distances from?
– Henning Makholm
4 hours ago
I think I made a mistake, I'll edit my answer.
– Larry
4 hours ago
I think I made a mistake, I'll edit my answer.
– Larry
4 hours ago
1
1
x @Larry: Um ... I can see what you're doing now, but it is quite wrong. "Radius" means distance from the axis of revolution, and the axis of revolution is the y-axis, not the red parabola! How would you rotate something about a curved axis anyway?
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
x @Larry: Um ... I can see what you're doing now, but it is quite wrong. "Radius" means distance from the axis of revolution, and the axis of revolution is the y-axis, not the red parabola! How would you rotate something about a curved axis anyway?
– Henning Makholm
3 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055421%2fwasher-method-confusion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown