Evaluate $lim_{h rightarrow 0} {(x+h)^{99}-x^{99}over h}$
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {(x+h)^{99}-x^{99}over h}$$
I need to factor this in order to get a limit.
I tried:
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {[(x+h)^{33}]^3-[(x)^{33}]^3over h}
\ lim_{h rightarrow 0} {[(x+h)^{33}-(x)^{33}][(x+h)^{66}+(x+h)^{33}(x)^{33}+(x)^{66}]over h}$$
However this does not seem helpful.
How do I approach this question?
algebra-precalculus limits functions
|
show 2 more comments
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {(x+h)^{99}-x^{99}over h}$$
I need to factor this in order to get a limit.
I tried:
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {[(x+h)^{33}]^3-[(x)^{33}]^3over h}
\ lim_{h rightarrow 0} {[(x+h)^{33}-(x)^{33}][(x+h)^{66}+(x+h)^{33}(x)^{33}+(x)^{66}]over h}$$
However this does not seem helpful.
How do I approach this question?
algebra-precalculus limits functions
Do you mean $h to 0$?
– MisterRiemann
Nov 26 at 21:52
yes, thank you @MisterRiemann
– didgocks
Nov 26 at 21:53
Hint: Limit definition of the derivative of $f(x)=x^{99}$.
– Anurag A
Nov 26 at 21:53
Use the binomial theorem.
– gammatester
Nov 26 at 21:54
1
The decomposition you show is not particularly helpful. Just apply the binomial theorem, and show that most of the terms disappear as $h$ goes to $0.$ Or, rewrite it saying $a=x+h, lim_limits{ato x} frac {a^{99} - x^{99}}{a-x}$ then factor $a^{99} - x^{99} = (a-x)(a^{98} + a^{97}x + cdots + x^{98})$ cancel the common factor and let $a = x$
– Doug M
Nov 26 at 21:57
|
show 2 more comments
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {(x+h)^{99}-x^{99}over h}$$
I need to factor this in order to get a limit.
I tried:
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {[(x+h)^{33}]^3-[(x)^{33}]^3over h}
\ lim_{h rightarrow 0} {[(x+h)^{33}-(x)^{33}][(x+h)^{66}+(x+h)^{33}(x)^{33}+(x)^{66}]over h}$$
However this does not seem helpful.
How do I approach this question?
algebra-precalculus limits functions
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {(x+h)^{99}-x^{99}over h}$$
I need to factor this in order to get a limit.
I tried:
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {[(x+h)^{33}]^3-[(x)^{33}]^3over h}
\ lim_{h rightarrow 0} {[(x+h)^{33}-(x)^{33}][(x+h)^{66}+(x+h)^{33}(x)^{33}+(x)^{66}]over h}$$
However this does not seem helpful.
How do I approach this question?
algebra-precalculus limits functions
algebra-precalculus limits functions
edited Nov 27 at 4:44
Paramanand Singh
48.9k555158
48.9k555158
asked Nov 26 at 21:51
didgocks
680823
680823
Do you mean $h to 0$?
– MisterRiemann
Nov 26 at 21:52
yes, thank you @MisterRiemann
– didgocks
Nov 26 at 21:53
Hint: Limit definition of the derivative of $f(x)=x^{99}$.
– Anurag A
Nov 26 at 21:53
Use the binomial theorem.
– gammatester
Nov 26 at 21:54
1
The decomposition you show is not particularly helpful. Just apply the binomial theorem, and show that most of the terms disappear as $h$ goes to $0.$ Or, rewrite it saying $a=x+h, lim_limits{ato x} frac {a^{99} - x^{99}}{a-x}$ then factor $a^{99} - x^{99} = (a-x)(a^{98} + a^{97}x + cdots + x^{98})$ cancel the common factor and let $a = x$
– Doug M
Nov 26 at 21:57
|
show 2 more comments
Do you mean $h to 0$?
– MisterRiemann
Nov 26 at 21:52
yes, thank you @MisterRiemann
– didgocks
Nov 26 at 21:53
Hint: Limit definition of the derivative of $f(x)=x^{99}$.
– Anurag A
Nov 26 at 21:53
Use the binomial theorem.
– gammatester
Nov 26 at 21:54
1
The decomposition you show is not particularly helpful. Just apply the binomial theorem, and show that most of the terms disappear as $h$ goes to $0.$ Or, rewrite it saying $a=x+h, lim_limits{ato x} frac {a^{99} - x^{99}}{a-x}$ then factor $a^{99} - x^{99} = (a-x)(a^{98} + a^{97}x + cdots + x^{98})$ cancel the common factor and let $a = x$
– Doug M
Nov 26 at 21:57
Do you mean $h to 0$?
– MisterRiemann
Nov 26 at 21:52
Do you mean $h to 0$?
– MisterRiemann
Nov 26 at 21:52
yes, thank you @MisterRiemann
– didgocks
Nov 26 at 21:53
yes, thank you @MisterRiemann
– didgocks
Nov 26 at 21:53
Hint: Limit definition of the derivative of $f(x)=x^{99}$.
– Anurag A
Nov 26 at 21:53
Hint: Limit definition of the derivative of $f(x)=x^{99}$.
– Anurag A
Nov 26 at 21:53
Use the binomial theorem.
– gammatester
Nov 26 at 21:54
Use the binomial theorem.
– gammatester
Nov 26 at 21:54
1
1
The decomposition you show is not particularly helpful. Just apply the binomial theorem, and show that most of the terms disappear as $h$ goes to $0.$ Or, rewrite it saying $a=x+h, lim_limits{ato x} frac {a^{99} - x^{99}}{a-x}$ then factor $a^{99} - x^{99} = (a-x)(a^{98} + a^{97}x + cdots + x^{98})$ cancel the common factor and let $a = x$
– Doug M
Nov 26 at 21:57
The decomposition you show is not particularly helpful. Just apply the binomial theorem, and show that most of the terms disappear as $h$ goes to $0.$ Or, rewrite it saying $a=x+h, lim_limits{ato x} frac {a^{99} - x^{99}}{a-x}$ then factor $a^{99} - x^{99} = (a-x)(a^{98} + a^{97}x + cdots + x^{98})$ cancel the common factor and let $a = x$
– Doug M
Nov 26 at 21:57
|
show 2 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
If you're familiar with derivatives, then you can recall that
$$ f'(x) = lim_{hto 0} frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} $$
and consider $f(x) = x^{99}$.
Otherwise, use the binomial theorem:
begin{align}frac{(x+h)^{99}-x^{99}}{h} &= frac{1}{h}left( sum_{k=0}^{99} binom{99}{k}x^{99-k}h^{k} - x^{99} right) = frac{1}{h}sum_{k=1}^{99}binom{99}{k}x^{99-k}h^{k}\&= binom{99}{1}x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}binom{99}{k}x^{99-k}h^{k-1}
to 99x^{98}, quad text{as }hto 0.
end{align}
1
You made a typing mistake: It should be $f(x+h)-f(x)$, not $f(x+h)-f(h)$.
– Martin Rosenau
Nov 26 at 21:58
@MartinRosenau Thanks!
– MisterRiemann
Nov 26 at 21:58
add a comment |
Hint: That’s basically the derivative of $f(x) = x^{99}$.
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {(x+h)^{99}-x^{99}over h}$$
Recall that by Binomial Expansion,
$$(a+b)^n = sum_{r = 0}^{n} {n choose r}a^{n-r}b^r$$
So you get
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {color{blue}{{99 choose 0}x^{99}}+{99 choose 1}x^{98}h+{99 choose 2}x^{97}h^2+…+{99 choose n}h^{99}color{red}{-x^{99}}over h}$$
Cancel out the first and last terms. From here, notice if anything can be factored. Also, as another hint (for later simplifications), $${n choose r} = frac{n!}{r!{(n-r)!}}$$
add a comment |
The trick is to realise that $h to 0$ means $h$ is arbitrarily small so we can assume $h < 1$ and so $h > h^2 > h^3$ and that the "higher values of $h$" become "negligible"
So you are thinking way too hard. Just use the binomial theorem to get $(x + h)^{99} = x^{99} + 99hx^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k} h^kx^{99-k}$ and hope that must of those higher values will become negligible.
And indeed:
$require{cancel}limlimits_{hto 0}frac {(x + h)^{99}-x^{99}}{h }=$
$limlimits_{hto 0}frac {x^{99} + 99hx^{98} + (sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k} h^kx^{99-k})-x^{99}}{h}=$
$limlimits_{hto 0}frac {color{green}{cancel{x^{99}}} + 99color{red}{cancel h}x^{98} + (sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k} h^{color{red}{cancel {k}}k-1}x^{99-k}) - color{green}{cancel{x^{99}}}}{color{red}{cancel h}}=$
$limlimits_{hto 0}(99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k}h^{k-1}x^{99-k})=$
$99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}{99 choose k}(limlimits_{hto 0} h^{k-1})x^{99-k}=$
$99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}{99 choose k}(0)x^{99-k}=$
$99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}0=$
$99x^{98}$
======
Doug M had an intriguing hint in the comments:
Considering $a^n - b^n = (a-b)(a^{n-1} + a^{n-2}b+ .... + ab^{n-2}+ b^{99})$ we get:
$(x + h)^{99} - x^{99}=$
$[(x+h) - x][(x+h)^{98} + (x+h)^{97}x + ... + (x+h)x^{97} + x^{98}]=$
$h[(x+h)^{98} + (x+h)^{97}x + ... + (x+h)x^{97} + x^{98}]$
And
$[(x+h)^{98} + (x+h)^{97}x + ... + (x+h)x^{97} + x^{98}]=$
$(x^{98} + text{a bunch of stuff with h as a factor})+(x^{97}cdot x + x(text{a bunch of stuff with h as a factor}))+... (xcdot x^{97} + x^{97}(text{a bunch of stuff with h as a factor})) + x^{98})=$
$99x^{98} + text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}$
So $frac {(x+h)^{98} - x^{99}}h=$
$frac {h(99x^{98}+ text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}}h = $
$99x^{98} + text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}$
... and "$ text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}$" goes to $0$ as .... it's a REALLY big bunch of stuff with $h$ as a factor.
Okay, .... it was an intriguing idea and I'm glad I did it but.... I don't think it's a very practical way to do it.
1
Hoping that you don't mind, I shall adopt and reuse the REALLY big bunch of stuff
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 27 at 6:01
add a comment |
Because both $limlimits_{hto 0}((x-h)^{99}-x^{99})=0$ and $limlimits_{hto 0}h=0$ you may also use L'Hospital's rule:
$displaystylelimlimits_{hto 0}frac{(x-h)^{99}-x^{99}}{h}=displaystylelimlimits_{hto 0}frac{frac{d}{dh}((x-h)^{99}-x^{99})}{frac{d}{dh}h}=displaystylelimlimits_{hto 0}frac{99(x-h)^{98}-0}{1}=99x^{98}$
1
L'Hospital is far too complicated. If you know derivatives, you can use the definition in this case.
– gammatester
Nov 26 at 22:05
add a comment |
This limit is the derivative of $f(x)=x^{99}$. To get a generalization you can replace $99$ with $n$ where $n in mathbb{R}$. The limit thus translates to $displaystyle lim_{h to 0} frac{(x+h)^{n}-x^n}{h}$.
Using Binomial Theorem, which states that $(a+b)^n=displaystyle sum_{k=0}^n {n choose k} a^{n-k} b^k$. Substituting $begin{pmatrix}a \ bend{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix}x \ hend{pmatrix}$. $$(x+h)^n=x^n+{n choose 1}x^{n-1} h + {n choose 2} x^{n-2} h^2+ cdots +{n choose n-1}xh^{n-1}+h^n$$ Putting back this result in the expression for the limit. We get the following limit $$displaystyle lim_{h to 0} frac{(x+h)^n-x^n}{h}=displaystyle lim_{h to 0} Biggl(frac{1}{h}{n choose 1}x^{n-1}h+frac{1}{h}biggl(h^2biggl({n choose 2}x^{n-2}+{n choose 3}x^{n-3}h+cdots+h^{n-2}biggr)biggr)Biggr)$$ $$=displaystyle lim_{h to 0} Biggl(biggl(nx^{n-1}biggr)+hbiggl({n choose 2}x^{n-2}+{n choose 3}x^{n-3}h+cdots+h^{n-2}biggr)Biggr)$$ $$=displaystyle lim_{h to 0}nx^{n-1}+underbrace{displaystyle lim_{h to 0}hbiggl({n choose 2}x^{n-2}+{n choose 3}x^{n-3}h+cdots+h^{n-2}biggr)}_{= 0}$$
$$implies displaystyle lim_{h to 0}frac{(x+h)^n-x^n}{h}= nx^{n-1}$$
Therefore, For $n=99$, the given limit evaluates to $99x^{98}$. Cheers
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014988%2fevaluate-lim-h-rightarrow-0-xh99-x99-over-h%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If you're familiar with derivatives, then you can recall that
$$ f'(x) = lim_{hto 0} frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} $$
and consider $f(x) = x^{99}$.
Otherwise, use the binomial theorem:
begin{align}frac{(x+h)^{99}-x^{99}}{h} &= frac{1}{h}left( sum_{k=0}^{99} binom{99}{k}x^{99-k}h^{k} - x^{99} right) = frac{1}{h}sum_{k=1}^{99}binom{99}{k}x^{99-k}h^{k}\&= binom{99}{1}x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}binom{99}{k}x^{99-k}h^{k-1}
to 99x^{98}, quad text{as }hto 0.
end{align}
1
You made a typing mistake: It should be $f(x+h)-f(x)$, not $f(x+h)-f(h)$.
– Martin Rosenau
Nov 26 at 21:58
@MartinRosenau Thanks!
– MisterRiemann
Nov 26 at 21:58
add a comment |
If you're familiar with derivatives, then you can recall that
$$ f'(x) = lim_{hto 0} frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} $$
and consider $f(x) = x^{99}$.
Otherwise, use the binomial theorem:
begin{align}frac{(x+h)^{99}-x^{99}}{h} &= frac{1}{h}left( sum_{k=0}^{99} binom{99}{k}x^{99-k}h^{k} - x^{99} right) = frac{1}{h}sum_{k=1}^{99}binom{99}{k}x^{99-k}h^{k}\&= binom{99}{1}x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}binom{99}{k}x^{99-k}h^{k-1}
to 99x^{98}, quad text{as }hto 0.
end{align}
1
You made a typing mistake: It should be $f(x+h)-f(x)$, not $f(x+h)-f(h)$.
– Martin Rosenau
Nov 26 at 21:58
@MartinRosenau Thanks!
– MisterRiemann
Nov 26 at 21:58
add a comment |
If you're familiar with derivatives, then you can recall that
$$ f'(x) = lim_{hto 0} frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} $$
and consider $f(x) = x^{99}$.
Otherwise, use the binomial theorem:
begin{align}frac{(x+h)^{99}-x^{99}}{h} &= frac{1}{h}left( sum_{k=0}^{99} binom{99}{k}x^{99-k}h^{k} - x^{99} right) = frac{1}{h}sum_{k=1}^{99}binom{99}{k}x^{99-k}h^{k}\&= binom{99}{1}x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}binom{99}{k}x^{99-k}h^{k-1}
to 99x^{98}, quad text{as }hto 0.
end{align}
If you're familiar with derivatives, then you can recall that
$$ f'(x) = lim_{hto 0} frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} $$
and consider $f(x) = x^{99}$.
Otherwise, use the binomial theorem:
begin{align}frac{(x+h)^{99}-x^{99}}{h} &= frac{1}{h}left( sum_{k=0}^{99} binom{99}{k}x^{99-k}h^{k} - x^{99} right) = frac{1}{h}sum_{k=1}^{99}binom{99}{k}x^{99-k}h^{k}\&= binom{99}{1}x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}binom{99}{k}x^{99-k}h^{k-1}
to 99x^{98}, quad text{as }hto 0.
end{align}
edited Nov 26 at 21:59
answered Nov 26 at 21:57
MisterRiemann
5,7691624
5,7691624
1
You made a typing mistake: It should be $f(x+h)-f(x)$, not $f(x+h)-f(h)$.
– Martin Rosenau
Nov 26 at 21:58
@MartinRosenau Thanks!
– MisterRiemann
Nov 26 at 21:58
add a comment |
1
You made a typing mistake: It should be $f(x+h)-f(x)$, not $f(x+h)-f(h)$.
– Martin Rosenau
Nov 26 at 21:58
@MartinRosenau Thanks!
– MisterRiemann
Nov 26 at 21:58
1
1
You made a typing mistake: It should be $f(x+h)-f(x)$, not $f(x+h)-f(h)$.
– Martin Rosenau
Nov 26 at 21:58
You made a typing mistake: It should be $f(x+h)-f(x)$, not $f(x+h)-f(h)$.
– Martin Rosenau
Nov 26 at 21:58
@MartinRosenau Thanks!
– MisterRiemann
Nov 26 at 21:58
@MartinRosenau Thanks!
– MisterRiemann
Nov 26 at 21:58
add a comment |
Hint: That’s basically the derivative of $f(x) = x^{99}$.
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {(x+h)^{99}-x^{99}over h}$$
Recall that by Binomial Expansion,
$$(a+b)^n = sum_{r = 0}^{n} {n choose r}a^{n-r}b^r$$
So you get
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {color{blue}{{99 choose 0}x^{99}}+{99 choose 1}x^{98}h+{99 choose 2}x^{97}h^2+…+{99 choose n}h^{99}color{red}{-x^{99}}over h}$$
Cancel out the first and last terms. From here, notice if anything can be factored. Also, as another hint (for later simplifications), $${n choose r} = frac{n!}{r!{(n-r)!}}$$
add a comment |
Hint: That’s basically the derivative of $f(x) = x^{99}$.
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {(x+h)^{99}-x^{99}over h}$$
Recall that by Binomial Expansion,
$$(a+b)^n = sum_{r = 0}^{n} {n choose r}a^{n-r}b^r$$
So you get
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {color{blue}{{99 choose 0}x^{99}}+{99 choose 1}x^{98}h+{99 choose 2}x^{97}h^2+…+{99 choose n}h^{99}color{red}{-x^{99}}over h}$$
Cancel out the first and last terms. From here, notice if anything can be factored. Also, as another hint (for later simplifications), $${n choose r} = frac{n!}{r!{(n-r)!}}$$
add a comment |
Hint: That’s basically the derivative of $f(x) = x^{99}$.
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {(x+h)^{99}-x^{99}over h}$$
Recall that by Binomial Expansion,
$$(a+b)^n = sum_{r = 0}^{n} {n choose r}a^{n-r}b^r$$
So you get
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {color{blue}{{99 choose 0}x^{99}}+{99 choose 1}x^{98}h+{99 choose 2}x^{97}h^2+…+{99 choose n}h^{99}color{red}{-x^{99}}over h}$$
Cancel out the first and last terms. From here, notice if anything can be factored. Also, as another hint (for later simplifications), $${n choose r} = frac{n!}{r!{(n-r)!}}$$
Hint: That’s basically the derivative of $f(x) = x^{99}$.
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {(x+h)^{99}-x^{99}over h}$$
Recall that by Binomial Expansion,
$$(a+b)^n = sum_{r = 0}^{n} {n choose r}a^{n-r}b^r$$
So you get
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0} {color{blue}{{99 choose 0}x^{99}}+{99 choose 1}x^{98}h+{99 choose 2}x^{97}h^2+…+{99 choose n}h^{99}color{red}{-x^{99}}over h}$$
Cancel out the first and last terms. From here, notice if anything can be factored. Also, as another hint (for later simplifications), $${n choose r} = frac{n!}{r!{(n-r)!}}$$
edited Nov 26 at 22:10
answered Nov 26 at 22:05
KM101
4,528418
4,528418
add a comment |
add a comment |
The trick is to realise that $h to 0$ means $h$ is arbitrarily small so we can assume $h < 1$ and so $h > h^2 > h^3$ and that the "higher values of $h$" become "negligible"
So you are thinking way too hard. Just use the binomial theorem to get $(x + h)^{99} = x^{99} + 99hx^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k} h^kx^{99-k}$ and hope that must of those higher values will become negligible.
And indeed:
$require{cancel}limlimits_{hto 0}frac {(x + h)^{99}-x^{99}}{h }=$
$limlimits_{hto 0}frac {x^{99} + 99hx^{98} + (sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k} h^kx^{99-k})-x^{99}}{h}=$
$limlimits_{hto 0}frac {color{green}{cancel{x^{99}}} + 99color{red}{cancel h}x^{98} + (sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k} h^{color{red}{cancel {k}}k-1}x^{99-k}) - color{green}{cancel{x^{99}}}}{color{red}{cancel h}}=$
$limlimits_{hto 0}(99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k}h^{k-1}x^{99-k})=$
$99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}{99 choose k}(limlimits_{hto 0} h^{k-1})x^{99-k}=$
$99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}{99 choose k}(0)x^{99-k}=$
$99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}0=$
$99x^{98}$
======
Doug M had an intriguing hint in the comments:
Considering $a^n - b^n = (a-b)(a^{n-1} + a^{n-2}b+ .... + ab^{n-2}+ b^{99})$ we get:
$(x + h)^{99} - x^{99}=$
$[(x+h) - x][(x+h)^{98} + (x+h)^{97}x + ... + (x+h)x^{97} + x^{98}]=$
$h[(x+h)^{98} + (x+h)^{97}x + ... + (x+h)x^{97} + x^{98}]$
And
$[(x+h)^{98} + (x+h)^{97}x + ... + (x+h)x^{97} + x^{98}]=$
$(x^{98} + text{a bunch of stuff with h as a factor})+(x^{97}cdot x + x(text{a bunch of stuff with h as a factor}))+... (xcdot x^{97} + x^{97}(text{a bunch of stuff with h as a factor})) + x^{98})=$
$99x^{98} + text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}$
So $frac {(x+h)^{98} - x^{99}}h=$
$frac {h(99x^{98}+ text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}}h = $
$99x^{98} + text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}$
... and "$ text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}$" goes to $0$ as .... it's a REALLY big bunch of stuff with $h$ as a factor.
Okay, .... it was an intriguing idea and I'm glad I did it but.... I don't think it's a very practical way to do it.
1
Hoping that you don't mind, I shall adopt and reuse the REALLY big bunch of stuff
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 27 at 6:01
add a comment |
The trick is to realise that $h to 0$ means $h$ is arbitrarily small so we can assume $h < 1$ and so $h > h^2 > h^3$ and that the "higher values of $h$" become "negligible"
So you are thinking way too hard. Just use the binomial theorem to get $(x + h)^{99} = x^{99} + 99hx^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k} h^kx^{99-k}$ and hope that must of those higher values will become negligible.
And indeed:
$require{cancel}limlimits_{hto 0}frac {(x + h)^{99}-x^{99}}{h }=$
$limlimits_{hto 0}frac {x^{99} + 99hx^{98} + (sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k} h^kx^{99-k})-x^{99}}{h}=$
$limlimits_{hto 0}frac {color{green}{cancel{x^{99}}} + 99color{red}{cancel h}x^{98} + (sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k} h^{color{red}{cancel {k}}k-1}x^{99-k}) - color{green}{cancel{x^{99}}}}{color{red}{cancel h}}=$
$limlimits_{hto 0}(99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k}h^{k-1}x^{99-k})=$
$99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}{99 choose k}(limlimits_{hto 0} h^{k-1})x^{99-k}=$
$99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}{99 choose k}(0)x^{99-k}=$
$99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}0=$
$99x^{98}$
======
Doug M had an intriguing hint in the comments:
Considering $a^n - b^n = (a-b)(a^{n-1} + a^{n-2}b+ .... + ab^{n-2}+ b^{99})$ we get:
$(x + h)^{99} - x^{99}=$
$[(x+h) - x][(x+h)^{98} + (x+h)^{97}x + ... + (x+h)x^{97} + x^{98}]=$
$h[(x+h)^{98} + (x+h)^{97}x + ... + (x+h)x^{97} + x^{98}]$
And
$[(x+h)^{98} + (x+h)^{97}x + ... + (x+h)x^{97} + x^{98}]=$
$(x^{98} + text{a bunch of stuff with h as a factor})+(x^{97}cdot x + x(text{a bunch of stuff with h as a factor}))+... (xcdot x^{97} + x^{97}(text{a bunch of stuff with h as a factor})) + x^{98})=$
$99x^{98} + text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}$
So $frac {(x+h)^{98} - x^{99}}h=$
$frac {h(99x^{98}+ text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}}h = $
$99x^{98} + text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}$
... and "$ text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}$" goes to $0$ as .... it's a REALLY big bunch of stuff with $h$ as a factor.
Okay, .... it was an intriguing idea and I'm glad I did it but.... I don't think it's a very practical way to do it.
1
Hoping that you don't mind, I shall adopt and reuse the REALLY big bunch of stuff
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 27 at 6:01
add a comment |
The trick is to realise that $h to 0$ means $h$ is arbitrarily small so we can assume $h < 1$ and so $h > h^2 > h^3$ and that the "higher values of $h$" become "negligible"
So you are thinking way too hard. Just use the binomial theorem to get $(x + h)^{99} = x^{99} + 99hx^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k} h^kx^{99-k}$ and hope that must of those higher values will become negligible.
And indeed:
$require{cancel}limlimits_{hto 0}frac {(x + h)^{99}-x^{99}}{h }=$
$limlimits_{hto 0}frac {x^{99} + 99hx^{98} + (sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k} h^kx^{99-k})-x^{99}}{h}=$
$limlimits_{hto 0}frac {color{green}{cancel{x^{99}}} + 99color{red}{cancel h}x^{98} + (sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k} h^{color{red}{cancel {k}}k-1}x^{99-k}) - color{green}{cancel{x^{99}}}}{color{red}{cancel h}}=$
$limlimits_{hto 0}(99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k}h^{k-1}x^{99-k})=$
$99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}{99 choose k}(limlimits_{hto 0} h^{k-1})x^{99-k}=$
$99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}{99 choose k}(0)x^{99-k}=$
$99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}0=$
$99x^{98}$
======
Doug M had an intriguing hint in the comments:
Considering $a^n - b^n = (a-b)(a^{n-1} + a^{n-2}b+ .... + ab^{n-2}+ b^{99})$ we get:
$(x + h)^{99} - x^{99}=$
$[(x+h) - x][(x+h)^{98} + (x+h)^{97}x + ... + (x+h)x^{97} + x^{98}]=$
$h[(x+h)^{98} + (x+h)^{97}x + ... + (x+h)x^{97} + x^{98}]$
And
$[(x+h)^{98} + (x+h)^{97}x + ... + (x+h)x^{97} + x^{98}]=$
$(x^{98} + text{a bunch of stuff with h as a factor})+(x^{97}cdot x + x(text{a bunch of stuff with h as a factor}))+... (xcdot x^{97} + x^{97}(text{a bunch of stuff with h as a factor})) + x^{98})=$
$99x^{98} + text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}$
So $frac {(x+h)^{98} - x^{99}}h=$
$frac {h(99x^{98}+ text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}}h = $
$99x^{98} + text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}$
... and "$ text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}$" goes to $0$ as .... it's a REALLY big bunch of stuff with $h$ as a factor.
Okay, .... it was an intriguing idea and I'm glad I did it but.... I don't think it's a very practical way to do it.
The trick is to realise that $h to 0$ means $h$ is arbitrarily small so we can assume $h < 1$ and so $h > h^2 > h^3$ and that the "higher values of $h$" become "negligible"
So you are thinking way too hard. Just use the binomial theorem to get $(x + h)^{99} = x^{99} + 99hx^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k} h^kx^{99-k}$ and hope that must of those higher values will become negligible.
And indeed:
$require{cancel}limlimits_{hto 0}frac {(x + h)^{99}-x^{99}}{h }=$
$limlimits_{hto 0}frac {x^{99} + 99hx^{98} + (sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k} h^kx^{99-k})-x^{99}}{h}=$
$limlimits_{hto 0}frac {color{green}{cancel{x^{99}}} + 99color{red}{cancel h}x^{98} + (sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k} h^{color{red}{cancel {k}}k-1}x^{99-k}) - color{green}{cancel{x^{99}}}}{color{red}{cancel h}}=$
$limlimits_{hto 0}(99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99} {99 choose k}h^{k-1}x^{99-k})=$
$99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}{99 choose k}(limlimits_{hto 0} h^{k-1})x^{99-k}=$
$99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}{99 choose k}(0)x^{99-k}=$
$99x^{98} + sum_{k=2}^{99}0=$
$99x^{98}$
======
Doug M had an intriguing hint in the comments:
Considering $a^n - b^n = (a-b)(a^{n-1} + a^{n-2}b+ .... + ab^{n-2}+ b^{99})$ we get:
$(x + h)^{99} - x^{99}=$
$[(x+h) - x][(x+h)^{98} + (x+h)^{97}x + ... + (x+h)x^{97} + x^{98}]=$
$h[(x+h)^{98} + (x+h)^{97}x + ... + (x+h)x^{97} + x^{98}]$
And
$[(x+h)^{98} + (x+h)^{97}x + ... + (x+h)x^{97} + x^{98}]=$
$(x^{98} + text{a bunch of stuff with h as a factor})+(x^{97}cdot x + x(text{a bunch of stuff with h as a factor}))+... (xcdot x^{97} + x^{97}(text{a bunch of stuff with h as a factor})) + x^{98})=$
$99x^{98} + text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}$
So $frac {(x+h)^{98} - x^{99}}h=$
$frac {h(99x^{98}+ text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}}h = $
$99x^{98} + text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}$
... and "$ text { a REALLY big bunch of stuff with h as a factor}$" goes to $0$ as .... it's a REALLY big bunch of stuff with $h$ as a factor.
Okay, .... it was an intriguing idea and I'm glad I did it but.... I don't think it's a very practical way to do it.
edited Nov 26 at 23:12
answered Nov 26 at 22:53
fleablood
68.1k22684
68.1k22684
1
Hoping that you don't mind, I shall adopt and reuse the REALLY big bunch of stuff
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 27 at 6:01
add a comment |
1
Hoping that you don't mind, I shall adopt and reuse the REALLY big bunch of stuff
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 27 at 6:01
1
1
Hoping that you don't mind, I shall adopt and reuse the REALLY big bunch of stuff
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 27 at 6:01
Hoping that you don't mind, I shall adopt and reuse the REALLY big bunch of stuff
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 27 at 6:01
add a comment |
Because both $limlimits_{hto 0}((x-h)^{99}-x^{99})=0$ and $limlimits_{hto 0}h=0$ you may also use L'Hospital's rule:
$displaystylelimlimits_{hto 0}frac{(x-h)^{99}-x^{99}}{h}=displaystylelimlimits_{hto 0}frac{frac{d}{dh}((x-h)^{99}-x^{99})}{frac{d}{dh}h}=displaystylelimlimits_{hto 0}frac{99(x-h)^{98}-0}{1}=99x^{98}$
1
L'Hospital is far too complicated. If you know derivatives, you can use the definition in this case.
– gammatester
Nov 26 at 22:05
add a comment |
Because both $limlimits_{hto 0}((x-h)^{99}-x^{99})=0$ and $limlimits_{hto 0}h=0$ you may also use L'Hospital's rule:
$displaystylelimlimits_{hto 0}frac{(x-h)^{99}-x^{99}}{h}=displaystylelimlimits_{hto 0}frac{frac{d}{dh}((x-h)^{99}-x^{99})}{frac{d}{dh}h}=displaystylelimlimits_{hto 0}frac{99(x-h)^{98}-0}{1}=99x^{98}$
1
L'Hospital is far too complicated. If you know derivatives, you can use the definition in this case.
– gammatester
Nov 26 at 22:05
add a comment |
Because both $limlimits_{hto 0}((x-h)^{99}-x^{99})=0$ and $limlimits_{hto 0}h=0$ you may also use L'Hospital's rule:
$displaystylelimlimits_{hto 0}frac{(x-h)^{99}-x^{99}}{h}=displaystylelimlimits_{hto 0}frac{frac{d}{dh}((x-h)^{99}-x^{99})}{frac{d}{dh}h}=displaystylelimlimits_{hto 0}frac{99(x-h)^{98}-0}{1}=99x^{98}$
Because both $limlimits_{hto 0}((x-h)^{99}-x^{99})=0$ and $limlimits_{hto 0}h=0$ you may also use L'Hospital's rule:
$displaystylelimlimits_{hto 0}frac{(x-h)^{99}-x^{99}}{h}=displaystylelimlimits_{hto 0}frac{frac{d}{dh}((x-h)^{99}-x^{99})}{frac{d}{dh}h}=displaystylelimlimits_{hto 0}frac{99(x-h)^{98}-0}{1}=99x^{98}$
answered Nov 26 at 22:03
Martin Rosenau
1,156139
1,156139
1
L'Hospital is far too complicated. If you know derivatives, you can use the definition in this case.
– gammatester
Nov 26 at 22:05
add a comment |
1
L'Hospital is far too complicated. If you know derivatives, you can use the definition in this case.
– gammatester
Nov 26 at 22:05
1
1
L'Hospital is far too complicated. If you know derivatives, you can use the definition in this case.
– gammatester
Nov 26 at 22:05
L'Hospital is far too complicated. If you know derivatives, you can use the definition in this case.
– gammatester
Nov 26 at 22:05
add a comment |
This limit is the derivative of $f(x)=x^{99}$. To get a generalization you can replace $99$ with $n$ where $n in mathbb{R}$. The limit thus translates to $displaystyle lim_{h to 0} frac{(x+h)^{n}-x^n}{h}$.
Using Binomial Theorem, which states that $(a+b)^n=displaystyle sum_{k=0}^n {n choose k} a^{n-k} b^k$. Substituting $begin{pmatrix}a \ bend{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix}x \ hend{pmatrix}$. $$(x+h)^n=x^n+{n choose 1}x^{n-1} h + {n choose 2} x^{n-2} h^2+ cdots +{n choose n-1}xh^{n-1}+h^n$$ Putting back this result in the expression for the limit. We get the following limit $$displaystyle lim_{h to 0} frac{(x+h)^n-x^n}{h}=displaystyle lim_{h to 0} Biggl(frac{1}{h}{n choose 1}x^{n-1}h+frac{1}{h}biggl(h^2biggl({n choose 2}x^{n-2}+{n choose 3}x^{n-3}h+cdots+h^{n-2}biggr)biggr)Biggr)$$ $$=displaystyle lim_{h to 0} Biggl(biggl(nx^{n-1}biggr)+hbiggl({n choose 2}x^{n-2}+{n choose 3}x^{n-3}h+cdots+h^{n-2}biggr)Biggr)$$ $$=displaystyle lim_{h to 0}nx^{n-1}+underbrace{displaystyle lim_{h to 0}hbiggl({n choose 2}x^{n-2}+{n choose 3}x^{n-3}h+cdots+h^{n-2}biggr)}_{= 0}$$
$$implies displaystyle lim_{h to 0}frac{(x+h)^n-x^n}{h}= nx^{n-1}$$
Therefore, For $n=99$, the given limit evaluates to $99x^{98}$. Cheers
add a comment |
This limit is the derivative of $f(x)=x^{99}$. To get a generalization you can replace $99$ with $n$ where $n in mathbb{R}$. The limit thus translates to $displaystyle lim_{h to 0} frac{(x+h)^{n}-x^n}{h}$.
Using Binomial Theorem, which states that $(a+b)^n=displaystyle sum_{k=0}^n {n choose k} a^{n-k} b^k$. Substituting $begin{pmatrix}a \ bend{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix}x \ hend{pmatrix}$. $$(x+h)^n=x^n+{n choose 1}x^{n-1} h + {n choose 2} x^{n-2} h^2+ cdots +{n choose n-1}xh^{n-1}+h^n$$ Putting back this result in the expression for the limit. We get the following limit $$displaystyle lim_{h to 0} frac{(x+h)^n-x^n}{h}=displaystyle lim_{h to 0} Biggl(frac{1}{h}{n choose 1}x^{n-1}h+frac{1}{h}biggl(h^2biggl({n choose 2}x^{n-2}+{n choose 3}x^{n-3}h+cdots+h^{n-2}biggr)biggr)Biggr)$$ $$=displaystyle lim_{h to 0} Biggl(biggl(nx^{n-1}biggr)+hbiggl({n choose 2}x^{n-2}+{n choose 3}x^{n-3}h+cdots+h^{n-2}biggr)Biggr)$$ $$=displaystyle lim_{h to 0}nx^{n-1}+underbrace{displaystyle lim_{h to 0}hbiggl({n choose 2}x^{n-2}+{n choose 3}x^{n-3}h+cdots+h^{n-2}biggr)}_{= 0}$$
$$implies displaystyle lim_{h to 0}frac{(x+h)^n-x^n}{h}= nx^{n-1}$$
Therefore, For $n=99$, the given limit evaluates to $99x^{98}$. Cheers
add a comment |
This limit is the derivative of $f(x)=x^{99}$. To get a generalization you can replace $99$ with $n$ where $n in mathbb{R}$. The limit thus translates to $displaystyle lim_{h to 0} frac{(x+h)^{n}-x^n}{h}$.
Using Binomial Theorem, which states that $(a+b)^n=displaystyle sum_{k=0}^n {n choose k} a^{n-k} b^k$. Substituting $begin{pmatrix}a \ bend{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix}x \ hend{pmatrix}$. $$(x+h)^n=x^n+{n choose 1}x^{n-1} h + {n choose 2} x^{n-2} h^2+ cdots +{n choose n-1}xh^{n-1}+h^n$$ Putting back this result in the expression for the limit. We get the following limit $$displaystyle lim_{h to 0} frac{(x+h)^n-x^n}{h}=displaystyle lim_{h to 0} Biggl(frac{1}{h}{n choose 1}x^{n-1}h+frac{1}{h}biggl(h^2biggl({n choose 2}x^{n-2}+{n choose 3}x^{n-3}h+cdots+h^{n-2}biggr)biggr)Biggr)$$ $$=displaystyle lim_{h to 0} Biggl(biggl(nx^{n-1}biggr)+hbiggl({n choose 2}x^{n-2}+{n choose 3}x^{n-3}h+cdots+h^{n-2}biggr)Biggr)$$ $$=displaystyle lim_{h to 0}nx^{n-1}+underbrace{displaystyle lim_{h to 0}hbiggl({n choose 2}x^{n-2}+{n choose 3}x^{n-3}h+cdots+h^{n-2}biggr)}_{= 0}$$
$$implies displaystyle lim_{h to 0}frac{(x+h)^n-x^n}{h}= nx^{n-1}$$
Therefore, For $n=99$, the given limit evaluates to $99x^{98}$. Cheers
This limit is the derivative of $f(x)=x^{99}$. To get a generalization you can replace $99$ with $n$ where $n in mathbb{R}$. The limit thus translates to $displaystyle lim_{h to 0} frac{(x+h)^{n}-x^n}{h}$.
Using Binomial Theorem, which states that $(a+b)^n=displaystyle sum_{k=0}^n {n choose k} a^{n-k} b^k$. Substituting $begin{pmatrix}a \ bend{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix}x \ hend{pmatrix}$. $$(x+h)^n=x^n+{n choose 1}x^{n-1} h + {n choose 2} x^{n-2} h^2+ cdots +{n choose n-1}xh^{n-1}+h^n$$ Putting back this result in the expression for the limit. We get the following limit $$displaystyle lim_{h to 0} frac{(x+h)^n-x^n}{h}=displaystyle lim_{h to 0} Biggl(frac{1}{h}{n choose 1}x^{n-1}h+frac{1}{h}biggl(h^2biggl({n choose 2}x^{n-2}+{n choose 3}x^{n-3}h+cdots+h^{n-2}biggr)biggr)Biggr)$$ $$=displaystyle lim_{h to 0} Biggl(biggl(nx^{n-1}biggr)+hbiggl({n choose 2}x^{n-2}+{n choose 3}x^{n-3}h+cdots+h^{n-2}biggr)Biggr)$$ $$=displaystyle lim_{h to 0}nx^{n-1}+underbrace{displaystyle lim_{h to 0}hbiggl({n choose 2}x^{n-2}+{n choose 3}x^{n-3}h+cdots+h^{n-2}biggr)}_{= 0}$$
$$implies displaystyle lim_{h to 0}frac{(x+h)^n-x^n}{h}= nx^{n-1}$$
Therefore, For $n=99$, the given limit evaluates to $99x^{98}$. Cheers
answered Nov 28 at 8:18
Paras Khosla
449
449
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014988%2fevaluate-lim-h-rightarrow-0-xh99-x99-over-h%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Do you mean $h to 0$?
– MisterRiemann
Nov 26 at 21:52
yes, thank you @MisterRiemann
– didgocks
Nov 26 at 21:53
Hint: Limit definition of the derivative of $f(x)=x^{99}$.
– Anurag A
Nov 26 at 21:53
Use the binomial theorem.
– gammatester
Nov 26 at 21:54
1
The decomposition you show is not particularly helpful. Just apply the binomial theorem, and show that most of the terms disappear as $h$ goes to $0.$ Or, rewrite it saying $a=x+h, lim_limits{ato x} frac {a^{99} - x^{99}}{a-x}$ then factor $a^{99} - x^{99} = (a-x)(a^{98} + a^{97}x + cdots + x^{98})$ cancel the common factor and let $a = x$
– Doug M
Nov 26 at 21:57