Binary tetrahedral group and $rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$
$begingroup$
The binary tetrahedral group $mathbb T$ is an interesting 24-element group. For instance it can be expressed as the subgroup
$$ mathbb T = left{ pm 1, pm i, pm j, pm k, dfrac{pm 1 pm i pm j pm k}2 right} subseteq mathbb{H}^times$$
of the multiplicative group of the quaternions (which also gives you a fascinating regular 24-vertex 4-polyhedron).
Alternatively, the binary tetrahedral group can be thought of as the inverse image of $mathfrak A(4)$ through the 2:1 morphism $rm{SU}_2 to rm{SO}_3$ ($mathfrak A(4) subseteq rm{SO}_3$ being the group of direct isometries of the regular tetrahedron).
The property which puzzles me is the following: $mathbb T$ is isomorphic to the matrix group $rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$.
I'm able to give a proof of this result, but not an enlightening one. Essentially, a 24-element group with a normal subgroup isomorphic to the 8-element quaternion group $rm Q_8$ is either isomorphic to $rm Q_8 times rm C_3$ or to the unique nontrivial semidirect product $rm Q_8 rtimes rm C_3$; it's not that hard to prove that both $mathbb T$ and $rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ satisfy this property and belong to the second case. The only interesting thing about this proof is the description of that normal $rm Q_8$: on the one hand ${pm 1, pm i, pm j, pm k} subset mathbb T$ is the inverse image of the quite exceptional Vierergruppe $V_4 = { rm{id}, (12)(34), (13)(24), (14)(23)} lhd mathfrak A(4)subseteq rm{SO}_3$; on the other hand, the elements of $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ which are diagonalisable over $mathbb F_9$ — or, equivalently, $pm I_2$ and the matrices whose trace is zero — form a normal subgroup isomorphic to $rm Q_8$ (and it's quite astonishing they do form a subgroup!) whose elements are
$$begin{array}{l} begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} -1 & 0 \ 0 & -1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ -1 & 0 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} 0 & -1 \ 1 & 0 end{pmatrix},\ begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \ 1 & -1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} 1 & -1 \ -1 & -1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} -1 & 1 \ 1 & 1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} -1 & -1 \ -1 & 1 end{pmatrix}. end{array}$$
As I said earlier, this proof isn't very satisfying. Hence my question:
Is there an enlightening proof of the isomorphism $mathbb T simeq rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$?
group-theory finite-groups quaternions exceptional-isomorphisms
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
The binary tetrahedral group $mathbb T$ is an interesting 24-element group. For instance it can be expressed as the subgroup
$$ mathbb T = left{ pm 1, pm i, pm j, pm k, dfrac{pm 1 pm i pm j pm k}2 right} subseteq mathbb{H}^times$$
of the multiplicative group of the quaternions (which also gives you a fascinating regular 24-vertex 4-polyhedron).
Alternatively, the binary tetrahedral group can be thought of as the inverse image of $mathfrak A(4)$ through the 2:1 morphism $rm{SU}_2 to rm{SO}_3$ ($mathfrak A(4) subseteq rm{SO}_3$ being the group of direct isometries of the regular tetrahedron).
The property which puzzles me is the following: $mathbb T$ is isomorphic to the matrix group $rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$.
I'm able to give a proof of this result, but not an enlightening one. Essentially, a 24-element group with a normal subgroup isomorphic to the 8-element quaternion group $rm Q_8$ is either isomorphic to $rm Q_8 times rm C_3$ or to the unique nontrivial semidirect product $rm Q_8 rtimes rm C_3$; it's not that hard to prove that both $mathbb T$ and $rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ satisfy this property and belong to the second case. The only interesting thing about this proof is the description of that normal $rm Q_8$: on the one hand ${pm 1, pm i, pm j, pm k} subset mathbb T$ is the inverse image of the quite exceptional Vierergruppe $V_4 = { rm{id}, (12)(34), (13)(24), (14)(23)} lhd mathfrak A(4)subseteq rm{SO}_3$; on the other hand, the elements of $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ which are diagonalisable over $mathbb F_9$ — or, equivalently, $pm I_2$ and the matrices whose trace is zero — form a normal subgroup isomorphic to $rm Q_8$ (and it's quite astonishing they do form a subgroup!) whose elements are
$$begin{array}{l} begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} -1 & 0 \ 0 & -1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ -1 & 0 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} 0 & -1 \ 1 & 0 end{pmatrix},\ begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \ 1 & -1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} 1 & -1 \ -1 & -1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} -1 & 1 \ 1 & 1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} -1 & -1 \ -1 & 1 end{pmatrix}. end{array}$$
As I said earlier, this proof isn't very satisfying. Hence my question:
Is there an enlightening proof of the isomorphism $mathbb T simeq rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$?
group-theory finite-groups quaternions exceptional-isomorphisms
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I suspect that the binary tetrahedral group is conjugate to a subgroup of $text{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$. If so, it's known that if $G$ is a finite subgroup of $text{GL}_n(mathbb{Z})$ then $G$ injects into $text{GL}_n(mathbb{F}_3)$, and that provides a pretty straightforward isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Apr 24 '13 at 17:41
2
$begingroup$
The isomorphism $mathfrak A(4) simeq rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ is quite easy to see: the action of $rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ on the 4-element projective line $rm P^1(mathbb F_3)$ provides an injective morphism $rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3) to mathfrak S(4)$ which gives easily the desired isomorphism. What is unclear to me is why the double cover gives precisely $rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$. Maybe there are direct cohomological arguments?
$endgroup$
– PseudoNeo
Apr 24 '13 at 19:35
2
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan: I doubt it: finite subgroups of $rm{GL}_2(mathbb Z)$ preserve a scalar product, so they are cyclic or dihedral.
$endgroup$
– PseudoNeo
Apr 24 '13 at 19:38
3
$begingroup$
Well, this is probably not as geometric as you want, but $SL(2,3)$ is the only nontrivial "double cover" (central extension of order 2) over $PSL(2,3)$.
$endgroup$
– user641
Apr 24 '13 at 23:24
1
$begingroup$
There is a 2-dimensional complex representation of $Q_8$, but it cannot be written over the rationals, so $Q_8$ does not embed in ${rm GL}_2({mathbb Z})$. (But ${rm SL}_2(3)$, which contains $Q_8$, does embed in ${rm SL}_2(p)$ for all odd primes $p$.)
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Apr 25 '13 at 8:59
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
The binary tetrahedral group $mathbb T$ is an interesting 24-element group. For instance it can be expressed as the subgroup
$$ mathbb T = left{ pm 1, pm i, pm j, pm k, dfrac{pm 1 pm i pm j pm k}2 right} subseteq mathbb{H}^times$$
of the multiplicative group of the quaternions (which also gives you a fascinating regular 24-vertex 4-polyhedron).
Alternatively, the binary tetrahedral group can be thought of as the inverse image of $mathfrak A(4)$ through the 2:1 morphism $rm{SU}_2 to rm{SO}_3$ ($mathfrak A(4) subseteq rm{SO}_3$ being the group of direct isometries of the regular tetrahedron).
The property which puzzles me is the following: $mathbb T$ is isomorphic to the matrix group $rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$.
I'm able to give a proof of this result, but not an enlightening one. Essentially, a 24-element group with a normal subgroup isomorphic to the 8-element quaternion group $rm Q_8$ is either isomorphic to $rm Q_8 times rm C_3$ or to the unique nontrivial semidirect product $rm Q_8 rtimes rm C_3$; it's not that hard to prove that both $mathbb T$ and $rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ satisfy this property and belong to the second case. The only interesting thing about this proof is the description of that normal $rm Q_8$: on the one hand ${pm 1, pm i, pm j, pm k} subset mathbb T$ is the inverse image of the quite exceptional Vierergruppe $V_4 = { rm{id}, (12)(34), (13)(24), (14)(23)} lhd mathfrak A(4)subseteq rm{SO}_3$; on the other hand, the elements of $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ which are diagonalisable over $mathbb F_9$ — or, equivalently, $pm I_2$ and the matrices whose trace is zero — form a normal subgroup isomorphic to $rm Q_8$ (and it's quite astonishing they do form a subgroup!) whose elements are
$$begin{array}{l} begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} -1 & 0 \ 0 & -1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ -1 & 0 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} 0 & -1 \ 1 & 0 end{pmatrix},\ begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \ 1 & -1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} 1 & -1 \ -1 & -1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} -1 & 1 \ 1 & 1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} -1 & -1 \ -1 & 1 end{pmatrix}. end{array}$$
As I said earlier, this proof isn't very satisfying. Hence my question:
Is there an enlightening proof of the isomorphism $mathbb T simeq rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$?
group-theory finite-groups quaternions exceptional-isomorphisms
$endgroup$
The binary tetrahedral group $mathbb T$ is an interesting 24-element group. For instance it can be expressed as the subgroup
$$ mathbb T = left{ pm 1, pm i, pm j, pm k, dfrac{pm 1 pm i pm j pm k}2 right} subseteq mathbb{H}^times$$
of the multiplicative group of the quaternions (which also gives you a fascinating regular 24-vertex 4-polyhedron).
Alternatively, the binary tetrahedral group can be thought of as the inverse image of $mathfrak A(4)$ through the 2:1 morphism $rm{SU}_2 to rm{SO}_3$ ($mathfrak A(4) subseteq rm{SO}_3$ being the group of direct isometries of the regular tetrahedron).
The property which puzzles me is the following: $mathbb T$ is isomorphic to the matrix group $rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$.
I'm able to give a proof of this result, but not an enlightening one. Essentially, a 24-element group with a normal subgroup isomorphic to the 8-element quaternion group $rm Q_8$ is either isomorphic to $rm Q_8 times rm C_3$ or to the unique nontrivial semidirect product $rm Q_8 rtimes rm C_3$; it's not that hard to prove that both $mathbb T$ and $rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ satisfy this property and belong to the second case. The only interesting thing about this proof is the description of that normal $rm Q_8$: on the one hand ${pm 1, pm i, pm j, pm k} subset mathbb T$ is the inverse image of the quite exceptional Vierergruppe $V_4 = { rm{id}, (12)(34), (13)(24), (14)(23)} lhd mathfrak A(4)subseteq rm{SO}_3$; on the other hand, the elements of $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ which are diagonalisable over $mathbb F_9$ — or, equivalently, $pm I_2$ and the matrices whose trace is zero — form a normal subgroup isomorphic to $rm Q_8$ (and it's quite astonishing they do form a subgroup!) whose elements are
$$begin{array}{l} begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} -1 & 0 \ 0 & -1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ -1 & 0 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} 0 & -1 \ 1 & 0 end{pmatrix},\ begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \ 1 & -1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} 1 & -1 \ -1 & -1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} -1 & 1 \ 1 & 1 end{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} -1 & -1 \ -1 & 1 end{pmatrix}. end{array}$$
As I said earlier, this proof isn't very satisfying. Hence my question:
Is there an enlightening proof of the isomorphism $mathbb T simeq rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$?
group-theory finite-groups quaternions exceptional-isomorphisms
group-theory finite-groups quaternions exceptional-isomorphisms
edited May 24 '13 at 11:44
Grigory M
13.6k357104
13.6k357104
asked Apr 24 '13 at 14:17
PseudoNeoPseudoNeo
6,5492053
6,5492053
$begingroup$
I suspect that the binary tetrahedral group is conjugate to a subgroup of $text{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$. If so, it's known that if $G$ is a finite subgroup of $text{GL}_n(mathbb{Z})$ then $G$ injects into $text{GL}_n(mathbb{F}_3)$, and that provides a pretty straightforward isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Apr 24 '13 at 17:41
2
$begingroup$
The isomorphism $mathfrak A(4) simeq rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ is quite easy to see: the action of $rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ on the 4-element projective line $rm P^1(mathbb F_3)$ provides an injective morphism $rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3) to mathfrak S(4)$ which gives easily the desired isomorphism. What is unclear to me is why the double cover gives precisely $rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$. Maybe there are direct cohomological arguments?
$endgroup$
– PseudoNeo
Apr 24 '13 at 19:35
2
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan: I doubt it: finite subgroups of $rm{GL}_2(mathbb Z)$ preserve a scalar product, so they are cyclic or dihedral.
$endgroup$
– PseudoNeo
Apr 24 '13 at 19:38
3
$begingroup$
Well, this is probably not as geometric as you want, but $SL(2,3)$ is the only nontrivial "double cover" (central extension of order 2) over $PSL(2,3)$.
$endgroup$
– user641
Apr 24 '13 at 23:24
1
$begingroup$
There is a 2-dimensional complex representation of $Q_8$, but it cannot be written over the rationals, so $Q_8$ does not embed in ${rm GL}_2({mathbb Z})$. (But ${rm SL}_2(3)$, which contains $Q_8$, does embed in ${rm SL}_2(p)$ for all odd primes $p$.)
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Apr 25 '13 at 8:59
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I suspect that the binary tetrahedral group is conjugate to a subgroup of $text{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$. If so, it's known that if $G$ is a finite subgroup of $text{GL}_n(mathbb{Z})$ then $G$ injects into $text{GL}_n(mathbb{F}_3)$, and that provides a pretty straightforward isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Apr 24 '13 at 17:41
2
$begingroup$
The isomorphism $mathfrak A(4) simeq rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ is quite easy to see: the action of $rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ on the 4-element projective line $rm P^1(mathbb F_3)$ provides an injective morphism $rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3) to mathfrak S(4)$ which gives easily the desired isomorphism. What is unclear to me is why the double cover gives precisely $rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$. Maybe there are direct cohomological arguments?
$endgroup$
– PseudoNeo
Apr 24 '13 at 19:35
2
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan: I doubt it: finite subgroups of $rm{GL}_2(mathbb Z)$ preserve a scalar product, so they are cyclic or dihedral.
$endgroup$
– PseudoNeo
Apr 24 '13 at 19:38
3
$begingroup$
Well, this is probably not as geometric as you want, but $SL(2,3)$ is the only nontrivial "double cover" (central extension of order 2) over $PSL(2,3)$.
$endgroup$
– user641
Apr 24 '13 at 23:24
1
$begingroup$
There is a 2-dimensional complex representation of $Q_8$, but it cannot be written over the rationals, so $Q_8$ does not embed in ${rm GL}_2({mathbb Z})$. (But ${rm SL}_2(3)$, which contains $Q_8$, does embed in ${rm SL}_2(p)$ for all odd primes $p$.)
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Apr 25 '13 at 8:59
$begingroup$
I suspect that the binary tetrahedral group is conjugate to a subgroup of $text{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$. If so, it's known that if $G$ is a finite subgroup of $text{GL}_n(mathbb{Z})$ then $G$ injects into $text{GL}_n(mathbb{F}_3)$, and that provides a pretty straightforward isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Apr 24 '13 at 17:41
$begingroup$
I suspect that the binary tetrahedral group is conjugate to a subgroup of $text{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$. If so, it's known that if $G$ is a finite subgroup of $text{GL}_n(mathbb{Z})$ then $G$ injects into $text{GL}_n(mathbb{F}_3)$, and that provides a pretty straightforward isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Apr 24 '13 at 17:41
2
2
$begingroup$
The isomorphism $mathfrak A(4) simeq rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ is quite easy to see: the action of $rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ on the 4-element projective line $rm P^1(mathbb F_3)$ provides an injective morphism $rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3) to mathfrak S(4)$ which gives easily the desired isomorphism. What is unclear to me is why the double cover gives precisely $rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$. Maybe there are direct cohomological arguments?
$endgroup$
– PseudoNeo
Apr 24 '13 at 19:35
$begingroup$
The isomorphism $mathfrak A(4) simeq rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ is quite easy to see: the action of $rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ on the 4-element projective line $rm P^1(mathbb F_3)$ provides an injective morphism $rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3) to mathfrak S(4)$ which gives easily the desired isomorphism. What is unclear to me is why the double cover gives precisely $rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$. Maybe there are direct cohomological arguments?
$endgroup$
– PseudoNeo
Apr 24 '13 at 19:35
2
2
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan: I doubt it: finite subgroups of $rm{GL}_2(mathbb Z)$ preserve a scalar product, so they are cyclic or dihedral.
$endgroup$
– PseudoNeo
Apr 24 '13 at 19:38
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan: I doubt it: finite subgroups of $rm{GL}_2(mathbb Z)$ preserve a scalar product, so they are cyclic or dihedral.
$endgroup$
– PseudoNeo
Apr 24 '13 at 19:38
3
3
$begingroup$
Well, this is probably not as geometric as you want, but $SL(2,3)$ is the only nontrivial "double cover" (central extension of order 2) over $PSL(2,3)$.
$endgroup$
– user641
Apr 24 '13 at 23:24
$begingroup$
Well, this is probably not as geometric as you want, but $SL(2,3)$ is the only nontrivial "double cover" (central extension of order 2) over $PSL(2,3)$.
$endgroup$
– user641
Apr 24 '13 at 23:24
1
1
$begingroup$
There is a 2-dimensional complex representation of $Q_8$, but it cannot be written over the rationals, so $Q_8$ does not embed in ${rm GL}_2({mathbb Z})$. (But ${rm SL}_2(3)$, which contains $Q_8$, does embed in ${rm SL}_2(p)$ for all odd primes $p$.)
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Apr 25 '13 at 8:59
$begingroup$
There is a 2-dimensional complex representation of $Q_8$, but it cannot be written over the rationals, so $Q_8$ does not embed in ${rm GL}_2({mathbb Z})$. (But ${rm SL}_2(3)$, which contains $Q_8$, does embed in ${rm SL}_2(p)$ for all odd primes $p$.)
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Apr 25 '13 at 8:59
|
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let's start with the ring $H$ of Hurwitz quaternions (quaternions s.t. either all coefficients are integers or all coefficients are half-integers). The ring $Hotimesmathbb F_p$ is a quaternion algebra over a finite field, i.e. a matrix algebra $Mat_{2times 2}(mathbb F_p)$ (with determinant as the norm).
Now the binary tetrahedral group is the group of norm $1$ elements in $H$ and it maps injectively (for $p>2$) to the group of norm $1$ elements in $Hotimesmathbb F_p$, i.e. to $SL_2(mathbb F_p)$. In particular, for $p=3$ we get an isomorphism $mathbb Tto SL_2(mathbb F_3)$.
(Ref.: TWF 198.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We know that $mathbb T= <x,y,z| x^2=y^3=z^3=xyz>$. We also know that $ord(xyz)=2$, $mathbb{T}/<xyz> simeq A_4$ and $mathbb{T}$ has no subgroup of order 12.
In one of my problem sheets, we are intended to give a guided proof of the fact that $mathbb T simeq SL_2( mathbb F_3)$ by showing that the map $phi: mathbb T to SL_2(mathbb F_3)$ that sends $$x longrightarrow left( begin{array}{cc} 0 & 2 \ 1 & 0 end{array} right), y longrightarrow left( begin{array}{cc} 2 & 0 \ 1 & 2 end{array} right) text{ and } z longrightarrow left( begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1 \ 2 & 1 end{array} right)$$ extends to an isomorphism between $mathbb T$ and $SL_2( mathbb{F}_3)$. This map is clearly a homomorphism, because it is easy to see that the images of the generators respect the relations.
We can just count the elements of $SL_2(mathbb F_3)$ to see that $|SL_2(mathbb F_3)|= | mathbb{T}|=24$, so the only thing that we still have to show is either that $phi$ is injective or surjective. Anybody can think of an easy way to prove this? I think this might lead to an easy proof of the result, without even making use of the notion of semidirect products.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Maybe the confusion arrises from the fact that $mathbb{T}$
has no subgroup of order $12$.
Rather it has the quaternion group
$Q={pm1,pm i,pm j, pm k}$
as a subgroup of order $8$.
I think a good way to grasp this intuitively is to see it in the context of the well known action of $mathbb{H}^1$
on the pure quaternions $mathbb{H}_0simeqmathbb{R}^3$
by rotation via $q(p)=qpoverline{q}$,
which gives a double cover of $mathrm{SO}(3)$.
In particular,
$mathbb{H}^1/{pm1}congmathrm{SO}(3)$.
We can use this to realize the action of $mathbb{T}$
on a tetrahedron explicitly, as follows.
Let $Tsubsetmathbb{H}_0$
be the tetrahedron with vertices
$$i+j+k,quad i-j-k,quad -i+j-k,quad -i-j+k.$$
An element of $Q$
acts on this via rotation by $pi$
about a line through the midpoints of opposite sides of $T$.
An element of $mathbb{T}-Q$
acts on this by rotation by $2pi/3$
about a line through a vertex and the midpoint of its opposite face.
Any pair of elements of $mathbb{T}$
differing only by sign give the same action.
Now, by passing from $Q$
to $mathbb{T}$
we have tripled the size of the group,
and included everything necessary to get the full tetrahedral group,
but with redundancy.
In particular, the kernel of the action of $mathbb{T}$ on $T$ is ${pm1}$.
So $mathbb{T}$
gives a double cover of the tetrahedral group.
As you mentioned, there's a straightforward hands-on way to see that the tetrahedral group $mathfrak{U}(4)$
is isomorphic to $mathrm{PSL}(2,mathbb{F}_3)$.
So if we pull back to the full group,
we've got $mathbb{T}congmathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{F}_3)$.
This way of thinking about it is not my own invention. It's from a preprint I have of the book Quaternion Algebras by John Voight, which is expected to go into print very soon and which I highly recommend.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f371523%2fbinary-tetrahedral-group-and-rmsl-2-mathbb-f-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let's start with the ring $H$ of Hurwitz quaternions (quaternions s.t. either all coefficients are integers or all coefficients are half-integers). The ring $Hotimesmathbb F_p$ is a quaternion algebra over a finite field, i.e. a matrix algebra $Mat_{2times 2}(mathbb F_p)$ (with determinant as the norm).
Now the binary tetrahedral group is the group of norm $1$ elements in $H$ and it maps injectively (for $p>2$) to the group of norm $1$ elements in $Hotimesmathbb F_p$, i.e. to $SL_2(mathbb F_p)$. In particular, for $p=3$ we get an isomorphism $mathbb Tto SL_2(mathbb F_3)$.
(Ref.: TWF 198.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's start with the ring $H$ of Hurwitz quaternions (quaternions s.t. either all coefficients are integers or all coefficients are half-integers). The ring $Hotimesmathbb F_p$ is a quaternion algebra over a finite field, i.e. a matrix algebra $Mat_{2times 2}(mathbb F_p)$ (with determinant as the norm).
Now the binary tetrahedral group is the group of norm $1$ elements in $H$ and it maps injectively (for $p>2$) to the group of norm $1$ elements in $Hotimesmathbb F_p$, i.e. to $SL_2(mathbb F_p)$. In particular, for $p=3$ we get an isomorphism $mathbb Tto SL_2(mathbb F_3)$.
(Ref.: TWF 198.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's start with the ring $H$ of Hurwitz quaternions (quaternions s.t. either all coefficients are integers or all coefficients are half-integers). The ring $Hotimesmathbb F_p$ is a quaternion algebra over a finite field, i.e. a matrix algebra $Mat_{2times 2}(mathbb F_p)$ (with determinant as the norm).
Now the binary tetrahedral group is the group of norm $1$ elements in $H$ and it maps injectively (for $p>2$) to the group of norm $1$ elements in $Hotimesmathbb F_p$, i.e. to $SL_2(mathbb F_p)$. In particular, for $p=3$ we get an isomorphism $mathbb Tto SL_2(mathbb F_3)$.
(Ref.: TWF 198.)
$endgroup$
Let's start with the ring $H$ of Hurwitz quaternions (quaternions s.t. either all coefficients are integers or all coefficients are half-integers). The ring $Hotimesmathbb F_p$ is a quaternion algebra over a finite field, i.e. a matrix algebra $Mat_{2times 2}(mathbb F_p)$ (with determinant as the norm).
Now the binary tetrahedral group is the group of norm $1$ elements in $H$ and it maps injectively (for $p>2$) to the group of norm $1$ elements in $Hotimesmathbb F_p$, i.e. to $SL_2(mathbb F_p)$. In particular, for $p=3$ we get an isomorphism $mathbb Tto SL_2(mathbb F_3)$.
(Ref.: TWF 198.)
edited Dec 19 '18 at 4:17
the_fox
2,90031538
2,90031538
answered May 24 '13 at 11:36
Grigory MGrigory M
13.6k357104
13.6k357104
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We know that $mathbb T= <x,y,z| x^2=y^3=z^3=xyz>$. We also know that $ord(xyz)=2$, $mathbb{T}/<xyz> simeq A_4$ and $mathbb{T}$ has no subgroup of order 12.
In one of my problem sheets, we are intended to give a guided proof of the fact that $mathbb T simeq SL_2( mathbb F_3)$ by showing that the map $phi: mathbb T to SL_2(mathbb F_3)$ that sends $$x longrightarrow left( begin{array}{cc} 0 & 2 \ 1 & 0 end{array} right), y longrightarrow left( begin{array}{cc} 2 & 0 \ 1 & 2 end{array} right) text{ and } z longrightarrow left( begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1 \ 2 & 1 end{array} right)$$ extends to an isomorphism between $mathbb T$ and $SL_2( mathbb{F}_3)$. This map is clearly a homomorphism, because it is easy to see that the images of the generators respect the relations.
We can just count the elements of $SL_2(mathbb F_3)$ to see that $|SL_2(mathbb F_3)|= | mathbb{T}|=24$, so the only thing that we still have to show is either that $phi$ is injective or surjective. Anybody can think of an easy way to prove this? I think this might lead to an easy proof of the result, without even making use of the notion of semidirect products.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We know that $mathbb T= <x,y,z| x^2=y^3=z^3=xyz>$. We also know that $ord(xyz)=2$, $mathbb{T}/<xyz> simeq A_4$ and $mathbb{T}$ has no subgroup of order 12.
In one of my problem sheets, we are intended to give a guided proof of the fact that $mathbb T simeq SL_2( mathbb F_3)$ by showing that the map $phi: mathbb T to SL_2(mathbb F_3)$ that sends $$x longrightarrow left( begin{array}{cc} 0 & 2 \ 1 & 0 end{array} right), y longrightarrow left( begin{array}{cc} 2 & 0 \ 1 & 2 end{array} right) text{ and } z longrightarrow left( begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1 \ 2 & 1 end{array} right)$$ extends to an isomorphism between $mathbb T$ and $SL_2( mathbb{F}_3)$. This map is clearly a homomorphism, because it is easy to see that the images of the generators respect the relations.
We can just count the elements of $SL_2(mathbb F_3)$ to see that $|SL_2(mathbb F_3)|= | mathbb{T}|=24$, so the only thing that we still have to show is either that $phi$ is injective or surjective. Anybody can think of an easy way to prove this? I think this might lead to an easy proof of the result, without even making use of the notion of semidirect products.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We know that $mathbb T= <x,y,z| x^2=y^3=z^3=xyz>$. We also know that $ord(xyz)=2$, $mathbb{T}/<xyz> simeq A_4$ and $mathbb{T}$ has no subgroup of order 12.
In one of my problem sheets, we are intended to give a guided proof of the fact that $mathbb T simeq SL_2( mathbb F_3)$ by showing that the map $phi: mathbb T to SL_2(mathbb F_3)$ that sends $$x longrightarrow left( begin{array}{cc} 0 & 2 \ 1 & 0 end{array} right), y longrightarrow left( begin{array}{cc} 2 & 0 \ 1 & 2 end{array} right) text{ and } z longrightarrow left( begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1 \ 2 & 1 end{array} right)$$ extends to an isomorphism between $mathbb T$ and $SL_2( mathbb{F}_3)$. This map is clearly a homomorphism, because it is easy to see that the images of the generators respect the relations.
We can just count the elements of $SL_2(mathbb F_3)$ to see that $|SL_2(mathbb F_3)|= | mathbb{T}|=24$, so the only thing that we still have to show is either that $phi$ is injective or surjective. Anybody can think of an easy way to prove this? I think this might lead to an easy proof of the result, without even making use of the notion of semidirect products.
$endgroup$
We know that $mathbb T= <x,y,z| x^2=y^3=z^3=xyz>$. We also know that $ord(xyz)=2$, $mathbb{T}/<xyz> simeq A_4$ and $mathbb{T}$ has no subgroup of order 12.
In one of my problem sheets, we are intended to give a guided proof of the fact that $mathbb T simeq SL_2( mathbb F_3)$ by showing that the map $phi: mathbb T to SL_2(mathbb F_3)$ that sends $$x longrightarrow left( begin{array}{cc} 0 & 2 \ 1 & 0 end{array} right), y longrightarrow left( begin{array}{cc} 2 & 0 \ 1 & 2 end{array} right) text{ and } z longrightarrow left( begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1 \ 2 & 1 end{array} right)$$ extends to an isomorphism between $mathbb T$ and $SL_2( mathbb{F}_3)$. This map is clearly a homomorphism, because it is easy to see that the images of the generators respect the relations.
We can just count the elements of $SL_2(mathbb F_3)$ to see that $|SL_2(mathbb F_3)|= | mathbb{T}|=24$, so the only thing that we still have to show is either that $phi$ is injective or surjective. Anybody can think of an easy way to prove this? I think this might lead to an easy proof of the result, without even making use of the notion of semidirect products.
answered Mar 1 '14 at 9:40
George TurcasGeorge Turcas
513
513
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Maybe the confusion arrises from the fact that $mathbb{T}$
has no subgroup of order $12$.
Rather it has the quaternion group
$Q={pm1,pm i,pm j, pm k}$
as a subgroup of order $8$.
I think a good way to grasp this intuitively is to see it in the context of the well known action of $mathbb{H}^1$
on the pure quaternions $mathbb{H}_0simeqmathbb{R}^3$
by rotation via $q(p)=qpoverline{q}$,
which gives a double cover of $mathrm{SO}(3)$.
In particular,
$mathbb{H}^1/{pm1}congmathrm{SO}(3)$.
We can use this to realize the action of $mathbb{T}$
on a tetrahedron explicitly, as follows.
Let $Tsubsetmathbb{H}_0$
be the tetrahedron with vertices
$$i+j+k,quad i-j-k,quad -i+j-k,quad -i-j+k.$$
An element of $Q$
acts on this via rotation by $pi$
about a line through the midpoints of opposite sides of $T$.
An element of $mathbb{T}-Q$
acts on this by rotation by $2pi/3$
about a line through a vertex and the midpoint of its opposite face.
Any pair of elements of $mathbb{T}$
differing only by sign give the same action.
Now, by passing from $Q$
to $mathbb{T}$
we have tripled the size of the group,
and included everything necessary to get the full tetrahedral group,
but with redundancy.
In particular, the kernel of the action of $mathbb{T}$ on $T$ is ${pm1}$.
So $mathbb{T}$
gives a double cover of the tetrahedral group.
As you mentioned, there's a straightforward hands-on way to see that the tetrahedral group $mathfrak{U}(4)$
is isomorphic to $mathrm{PSL}(2,mathbb{F}_3)$.
So if we pull back to the full group,
we've got $mathbb{T}congmathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{F}_3)$.
This way of thinking about it is not my own invention. It's from a preprint I have of the book Quaternion Algebras by John Voight, which is expected to go into print very soon and which I highly recommend.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Maybe the confusion arrises from the fact that $mathbb{T}$
has no subgroup of order $12$.
Rather it has the quaternion group
$Q={pm1,pm i,pm j, pm k}$
as a subgroup of order $8$.
I think a good way to grasp this intuitively is to see it in the context of the well known action of $mathbb{H}^1$
on the pure quaternions $mathbb{H}_0simeqmathbb{R}^3$
by rotation via $q(p)=qpoverline{q}$,
which gives a double cover of $mathrm{SO}(3)$.
In particular,
$mathbb{H}^1/{pm1}congmathrm{SO}(3)$.
We can use this to realize the action of $mathbb{T}$
on a tetrahedron explicitly, as follows.
Let $Tsubsetmathbb{H}_0$
be the tetrahedron with vertices
$$i+j+k,quad i-j-k,quad -i+j-k,quad -i-j+k.$$
An element of $Q$
acts on this via rotation by $pi$
about a line through the midpoints of opposite sides of $T$.
An element of $mathbb{T}-Q$
acts on this by rotation by $2pi/3$
about a line through a vertex and the midpoint of its opposite face.
Any pair of elements of $mathbb{T}$
differing only by sign give the same action.
Now, by passing from $Q$
to $mathbb{T}$
we have tripled the size of the group,
and included everything necessary to get the full tetrahedral group,
but with redundancy.
In particular, the kernel of the action of $mathbb{T}$ on $T$ is ${pm1}$.
So $mathbb{T}$
gives a double cover of the tetrahedral group.
As you mentioned, there's a straightforward hands-on way to see that the tetrahedral group $mathfrak{U}(4)$
is isomorphic to $mathrm{PSL}(2,mathbb{F}_3)$.
So if we pull back to the full group,
we've got $mathbb{T}congmathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{F}_3)$.
This way of thinking about it is not my own invention. It's from a preprint I have of the book Quaternion Algebras by John Voight, which is expected to go into print very soon and which I highly recommend.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Maybe the confusion arrises from the fact that $mathbb{T}$
has no subgroup of order $12$.
Rather it has the quaternion group
$Q={pm1,pm i,pm j, pm k}$
as a subgroup of order $8$.
I think a good way to grasp this intuitively is to see it in the context of the well known action of $mathbb{H}^1$
on the pure quaternions $mathbb{H}_0simeqmathbb{R}^3$
by rotation via $q(p)=qpoverline{q}$,
which gives a double cover of $mathrm{SO}(3)$.
In particular,
$mathbb{H}^1/{pm1}congmathrm{SO}(3)$.
We can use this to realize the action of $mathbb{T}$
on a tetrahedron explicitly, as follows.
Let $Tsubsetmathbb{H}_0$
be the tetrahedron with vertices
$$i+j+k,quad i-j-k,quad -i+j-k,quad -i-j+k.$$
An element of $Q$
acts on this via rotation by $pi$
about a line through the midpoints of opposite sides of $T$.
An element of $mathbb{T}-Q$
acts on this by rotation by $2pi/3$
about a line through a vertex and the midpoint of its opposite face.
Any pair of elements of $mathbb{T}$
differing only by sign give the same action.
Now, by passing from $Q$
to $mathbb{T}$
we have tripled the size of the group,
and included everything necessary to get the full tetrahedral group,
but with redundancy.
In particular, the kernel of the action of $mathbb{T}$ on $T$ is ${pm1}$.
So $mathbb{T}$
gives a double cover of the tetrahedral group.
As you mentioned, there's a straightforward hands-on way to see that the tetrahedral group $mathfrak{U}(4)$
is isomorphic to $mathrm{PSL}(2,mathbb{F}_3)$.
So if we pull back to the full group,
we've got $mathbb{T}congmathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{F}_3)$.
This way of thinking about it is not my own invention. It's from a preprint I have of the book Quaternion Algebras by John Voight, which is expected to go into print very soon and which I highly recommend.
$endgroup$
Maybe the confusion arrises from the fact that $mathbb{T}$
has no subgroup of order $12$.
Rather it has the quaternion group
$Q={pm1,pm i,pm j, pm k}$
as a subgroup of order $8$.
I think a good way to grasp this intuitively is to see it in the context of the well known action of $mathbb{H}^1$
on the pure quaternions $mathbb{H}_0simeqmathbb{R}^3$
by rotation via $q(p)=qpoverline{q}$,
which gives a double cover of $mathrm{SO}(3)$.
In particular,
$mathbb{H}^1/{pm1}congmathrm{SO}(3)$.
We can use this to realize the action of $mathbb{T}$
on a tetrahedron explicitly, as follows.
Let $Tsubsetmathbb{H}_0$
be the tetrahedron with vertices
$$i+j+k,quad i-j-k,quad -i+j-k,quad -i-j+k.$$
An element of $Q$
acts on this via rotation by $pi$
about a line through the midpoints of opposite sides of $T$.
An element of $mathbb{T}-Q$
acts on this by rotation by $2pi/3$
about a line through a vertex and the midpoint of its opposite face.
Any pair of elements of $mathbb{T}$
differing only by sign give the same action.
Now, by passing from $Q$
to $mathbb{T}$
we have tripled the size of the group,
and included everything necessary to get the full tetrahedral group,
but with redundancy.
In particular, the kernel of the action of $mathbb{T}$ on $T$ is ${pm1}$.
So $mathbb{T}$
gives a double cover of the tetrahedral group.
As you mentioned, there's a straightforward hands-on way to see that the tetrahedral group $mathfrak{U}(4)$
is isomorphic to $mathrm{PSL}(2,mathbb{F}_3)$.
So if we pull back to the full group,
we've got $mathbb{T}congmathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{F}_3)$.
This way of thinking about it is not my own invention. It's from a preprint I have of the book Quaternion Algebras by John Voight, which is expected to go into print very soon and which I highly recommend.
edited Dec 18 '18 at 21:08
answered Feb 22 '17 at 1:10
j0equ1nnj0equ1nn
1,557923
1,557923
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f371523%2fbinary-tetrahedral-group-and-rmsl-2-mathbb-f-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I suspect that the binary tetrahedral group is conjugate to a subgroup of $text{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$. If so, it's known that if $G$ is a finite subgroup of $text{GL}_n(mathbb{Z})$ then $G$ injects into $text{GL}_n(mathbb{F}_3)$, and that provides a pretty straightforward isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Apr 24 '13 at 17:41
2
$begingroup$
The isomorphism $mathfrak A(4) simeq rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ is quite easy to see: the action of $rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3)$ on the 4-element projective line $rm P^1(mathbb F_3)$ provides an injective morphism $rm{PSL}_2(mathbb F_3) to mathfrak S(4)$ which gives easily the desired isomorphism. What is unclear to me is why the double cover gives precisely $rm{SL}_2(mathbb F_3)$. Maybe there are direct cohomological arguments?
$endgroup$
– PseudoNeo
Apr 24 '13 at 19:35
2
$begingroup$
@QiaochuYuan: I doubt it: finite subgroups of $rm{GL}_2(mathbb Z)$ preserve a scalar product, so they are cyclic or dihedral.
$endgroup$
– PseudoNeo
Apr 24 '13 at 19:38
3
$begingroup$
Well, this is probably not as geometric as you want, but $SL(2,3)$ is the only nontrivial "double cover" (central extension of order 2) over $PSL(2,3)$.
$endgroup$
– user641
Apr 24 '13 at 23:24
1
$begingroup$
There is a 2-dimensional complex representation of $Q_8$, but it cannot be written over the rationals, so $Q_8$ does not embed in ${rm GL}_2({mathbb Z})$. (But ${rm SL}_2(3)$, which contains $Q_8$, does embed in ${rm SL}_2(p)$ for all odd primes $p$.)
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Apr 25 '13 at 8:59