Not $sigma$-compact set without axiom of choice












0












$begingroup$



Today in measure theory, we introduced the concept of a $sigma$-compact set, which is a set which can be expressed as the countable union of compact set.




Since the set of $sigma$-compact sets seemed to be very large (I couldn't think of a not $sigma$-compact set), I asked for a set which is not $sigma$-compact, but our instructor couldn't come up with a set, which he didn't have to explicitly construct with the axiom of choice, for which we didn't have time.




My question is if there is such an set which can be constructed without the axiom of choice.







measure-theory compactness axiom-of-choice







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But this is not about "sets" it's about topology.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:50






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    The irrational numbers are famously not $sigma$-compact.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:51










  • $begingroup$
    $mathbb{R}$ in the discrete topology is not $sigma$-compact, as its only compact subsets are finite.
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 18 '18 at 22:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Henno: Since this is about measure theory, I expect the question is really in the context of $Bbb R$ with the standard topology and Lebesgue measure.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 18 '18 at 22:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Viktor, compact is a topological notion. Not a measure theoretic one.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 18 '18 at 22:18
















0












$begingroup$



Today in measure theory, we introduced the concept of a $sigma$-compact set, which is a set which can be expressed as the countable union of compact set.




Since the set of $sigma$-compact sets seemed to be very large (I couldn't think of a not $sigma$-compact set), I asked for a set which is not $sigma$-compact, but our instructor couldn't come up with a set, which he didn't have to explicitly construct with the axiom of choice, for which we didn't have time.




My question is if there is such an set which can be constructed without the axiom of choice.







measure-theory compactness axiom-of-choice







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But this is not about "sets" it's about topology.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:50






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    The irrational numbers are famously not $sigma$-compact.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:51










  • $begingroup$
    $mathbb{R}$ in the discrete topology is not $sigma$-compact, as its only compact subsets are finite.
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 18 '18 at 22:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Henno: Since this is about measure theory, I expect the question is really in the context of $Bbb R$ with the standard topology and Lebesgue measure.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 18 '18 at 22:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Viktor, compact is a topological notion. Not a measure theoretic one.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 18 '18 at 22:18














0












0








0





$begingroup$



Today in measure theory, we introduced the concept of a $sigma$-compact set, which is a set which can be expressed as the countable union of compact set.




Since the set of $sigma$-compact sets seemed to be very large (I couldn't think of a not $sigma$-compact set), I asked for a set which is not $sigma$-compact, but our instructor couldn't come up with a set, which he didn't have to explicitly construct with the axiom of choice, for which we didn't have time.




My question is if there is such an set which can be constructed without the axiom of choice.







measure-theory compactness axiom-of-choice







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





Today in measure theory, we introduced the concept of a $sigma$-compact set, which is a set which can be expressed as the countable union of compact set.




Since the set of $sigma$-compact sets seemed to be very large (I couldn't think of a not $sigma$-compact set), I asked for a set which is not $sigma$-compact, but our instructor couldn't come up with a set, which he didn't have to explicitly construct with the axiom of choice, for which we didn't have time.




My question is if there is such an set which can be constructed without the axiom of choice.







measure-theory compactness axiom-of-choice




measure-theory compactness axiom-of-choice






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 18 '18 at 21:49









Viktor GlombikViktor Glombik

1,1771528




1,1771528








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But this is not about "sets" it's about topology.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:50






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    The irrational numbers are famously not $sigma$-compact.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:51










  • $begingroup$
    $mathbb{R}$ in the discrete topology is not $sigma$-compact, as its only compact subsets are finite.
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 18 '18 at 22:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Henno: Since this is about measure theory, I expect the question is really in the context of $Bbb R$ with the standard topology and Lebesgue measure.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 18 '18 at 22:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Viktor, compact is a topological notion. Not a measure theoretic one.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 18 '18 at 22:18














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But this is not about "sets" it's about topology.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:50






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    The irrational numbers are famously not $sigma$-compact.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 18 '18 at 21:51










  • $begingroup$
    $mathbb{R}$ in the discrete topology is not $sigma$-compact, as its only compact subsets are finite.
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 18 '18 at 22:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Henno: Since this is about measure theory, I expect the question is really in the context of $Bbb R$ with the standard topology and Lebesgue measure.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 18 '18 at 22:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Viktor, compact is a topological notion. Not a measure theoretic one.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 18 '18 at 22:18








1




1




$begingroup$
But this is not about "sets" it's about topology.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Dec 18 '18 at 21:50




$begingroup$
But this is not about "sets" it's about topology.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Dec 18 '18 at 21:50




6




6




$begingroup$
The irrational numbers are famously not $sigma$-compact.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Dec 18 '18 at 21:51




$begingroup$
The irrational numbers are famously not $sigma$-compact.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Dec 18 '18 at 21:51












$begingroup$
$mathbb{R}$ in the discrete topology is not $sigma$-compact, as its only compact subsets are finite.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 18 '18 at 22:03




$begingroup$
$mathbb{R}$ in the discrete topology is not $sigma$-compact, as its only compact subsets are finite.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 18 '18 at 22:03




1




1




$begingroup$
@Henno: Since this is about measure theory, I expect the question is really in the context of $Bbb R$ with the standard topology and Lebesgue measure.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Dec 18 '18 at 22:06




$begingroup$
@Henno: Since this is about measure theory, I expect the question is really in the context of $Bbb R$ with the standard topology and Lebesgue measure.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Dec 18 '18 at 22:06




1




1




$begingroup$
Viktor, compact is a topological notion. Not a measure theoretic one.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Dec 18 '18 at 22:18




$begingroup$
Viktor, compact is a topological notion. Not a measure theoretic one.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Dec 18 '18 at 22:18










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

The axiom of choice is not needed to construct a subset of $Bbb R$ which is not $sigma$-compact (which I guess is ultimately what this question is about).



The irrational numbers form such a set, since any compact subset of $Bbb{Rsetminus Q}$ has an empty interior, and therefore any $sigma$-compact set of irrational numbers is the countable union of closed nowhere dense sets, which means that it is meager. But Baire's theorem shows that the irrational numbers are not meager.



(To the initiated, Baire's theorem is provable in $sf ZF$ when the space is separable, like $Bbb{Rsetminus Q}$ which has $pi+Bbb Q$ as a dense subset.)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    Note that - in $mathbb{R}$ at least - a set is $sigma$-compact only if (indeed, iff) it is the union of countably many closed sets. Such a set is called $F_sigma$ (or $Pi^0_2$). A fundamental theorem concerning the topology of $mathbb{R}$ is the Baire category theorem, which states that the intersection of countably many dense open sets is dense. An easy corollary is that no countable dense set can be the intersection of countably many open sets (exercise!), and as a consequence the complement of a countable dense set cannot be $F_sigma$.



    So in particular, the set of irrationals is not $sigma$-compact.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Well, BCT is generally equivalent to DC. So just saying "Oh BCT shows ..." is not enough to conclude that choice was not needed. But noting that the irrationals are separable is enough to finish the claim.
      $endgroup$
      – Asaf Karagila♦
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:58










    • $begingroup$
      I assure BCT is the Baire Category Theorem, but what is DC?
      $endgroup$
      – Viktor Glombik
      Dec 18 '18 at 22:15










    • $begingroup$
      @Viktor: Dependent Choice. It is a weak form of choice (or a strong form of countable choice).
      $endgroup$
      – Asaf Karagila♦
      Dec 18 '18 at 22:19











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045755%2fnot-sigma-compact-set-without-axiom-of-choice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    The axiom of choice is not needed to construct a subset of $Bbb R$ which is not $sigma$-compact (which I guess is ultimately what this question is about).



    The irrational numbers form such a set, since any compact subset of $Bbb{Rsetminus Q}$ has an empty interior, and therefore any $sigma$-compact set of irrational numbers is the countable union of closed nowhere dense sets, which means that it is meager. But Baire's theorem shows that the irrational numbers are not meager.



    (To the initiated, Baire's theorem is provable in $sf ZF$ when the space is separable, like $Bbb{Rsetminus Q}$ which has $pi+Bbb Q$ as a dense subset.)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      The axiom of choice is not needed to construct a subset of $Bbb R$ which is not $sigma$-compact (which I guess is ultimately what this question is about).



      The irrational numbers form such a set, since any compact subset of $Bbb{Rsetminus Q}$ has an empty interior, and therefore any $sigma$-compact set of irrational numbers is the countable union of closed nowhere dense sets, which means that it is meager. But Baire's theorem shows that the irrational numbers are not meager.



      (To the initiated, Baire's theorem is provable in $sf ZF$ when the space is separable, like $Bbb{Rsetminus Q}$ which has $pi+Bbb Q$ as a dense subset.)






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        The axiom of choice is not needed to construct a subset of $Bbb R$ which is not $sigma$-compact (which I guess is ultimately what this question is about).



        The irrational numbers form such a set, since any compact subset of $Bbb{Rsetminus Q}$ has an empty interior, and therefore any $sigma$-compact set of irrational numbers is the countable union of closed nowhere dense sets, which means that it is meager. But Baire's theorem shows that the irrational numbers are not meager.



        (To the initiated, Baire's theorem is provable in $sf ZF$ when the space is separable, like $Bbb{Rsetminus Q}$ which has $pi+Bbb Q$ as a dense subset.)






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The axiom of choice is not needed to construct a subset of $Bbb R$ which is not $sigma$-compact (which I guess is ultimately what this question is about).



        The irrational numbers form such a set, since any compact subset of $Bbb{Rsetminus Q}$ has an empty interior, and therefore any $sigma$-compact set of irrational numbers is the countable union of closed nowhere dense sets, which means that it is meager. But Baire's theorem shows that the irrational numbers are not meager.



        (To the initiated, Baire's theorem is provable in $sf ZF$ when the space is separable, like $Bbb{Rsetminus Q}$ which has $pi+Bbb Q$ as a dense subset.)







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 18 '18 at 21:56









        Asaf Karagila♦Asaf Karagila

        306k33438769




        306k33438769























            1












            $begingroup$

            Note that - in $mathbb{R}$ at least - a set is $sigma$-compact only if (indeed, iff) it is the union of countably many closed sets. Such a set is called $F_sigma$ (or $Pi^0_2$). A fundamental theorem concerning the topology of $mathbb{R}$ is the Baire category theorem, which states that the intersection of countably many dense open sets is dense. An easy corollary is that no countable dense set can be the intersection of countably many open sets (exercise!), and as a consequence the complement of a countable dense set cannot be $F_sigma$.



            So in particular, the set of irrationals is not $sigma$-compact.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Well, BCT is generally equivalent to DC. So just saying "Oh BCT shows ..." is not enough to conclude that choice was not needed. But noting that the irrationals are separable is enough to finish the claim.
              $endgroup$
              – Asaf Karagila♦
              Dec 18 '18 at 21:58










            • $begingroup$
              I assure BCT is the Baire Category Theorem, but what is DC?
              $endgroup$
              – Viktor Glombik
              Dec 18 '18 at 22:15










            • $begingroup$
              @Viktor: Dependent Choice. It is a weak form of choice (or a strong form of countable choice).
              $endgroup$
              – Asaf Karagila♦
              Dec 18 '18 at 22:19
















            1












            $begingroup$

            Note that - in $mathbb{R}$ at least - a set is $sigma$-compact only if (indeed, iff) it is the union of countably many closed sets. Such a set is called $F_sigma$ (or $Pi^0_2$). A fundamental theorem concerning the topology of $mathbb{R}$ is the Baire category theorem, which states that the intersection of countably many dense open sets is dense. An easy corollary is that no countable dense set can be the intersection of countably many open sets (exercise!), and as a consequence the complement of a countable dense set cannot be $F_sigma$.



            So in particular, the set of irrationals is not $sigma$-compact.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Well, BCT is generally equivalent to DC. So just saying "Oh BCT shows ..." is not enough to conclude that choice was not needed. But noting that the irrationals are separable is enough to finish the claim.
              $endgroup$
              – Asaf Karagila♦
              Dec 18 '18 at 21:58










            • $begingroup$
              I assure BCT is the Baire Category Theorem, but what is DC?
              $endgroup$
              – Viktor Glombik
              Dec 18 '18 at 22:15










            • $begingroup$
              @Viktor: Dependent Choice. It is a weak form of choice (or a strong form of countable choice).
              $endgroup$
              – Asaf Karagila♦
              Dec 18 '18 at 22:19














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Note that - in $mathbb{R}$ at least - a set is $sigma$-compact only if (indeed, iff) it is the union of countably many closed sets. Such a set is called $F_sigma$ (or $Pi^0_2$). A fundamental theorem concerning the topology of $mathbb{R}$ is the Baire category theorem, which states that the intersection of countably many dense open sets is dense. An easy corollary is that no countable dense set can be the intersection of countably many open sets (exercise!), and as a consequence the complement of a countable dense set cannot be $F_sigma$.



            So in particular, the set of irrationals is not $sigma$-compact.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Note that - in $mathbb{R}$ at least - a set is $sigma$-compact only if (indeed, iff) it is the union of countably many closed sets. Such a set is called $F_sigma$ (or $Pi^0_2$). A fundamental theorem concerning the topology of $mathbb{R}$ is the Baire category theorem, which states that the intersection of countably many dense open sets is dense. An easy corollary is that no countable dense set can be the intersection of countably many open sets (exercise!), and as a consequence the complement of a countable dense set cannot be $F_sigma$.



            So in particular, the set of irrationals is not $sigma$-compact.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 18 '18 at 21:56









            Noah SchweberNoah Schweber

            127k10151290




            127k10151290












            • $begingroup$
              Well, BCT is generally equivalent to DC. So just saying "Oh BCT shows ..." is not enough to conclude that choice was not needed. But noting that the irrationals are separable is enough to finish the claim.
              $endgroup$
              – Asaf Karagila♦
              Dec 18 '18 at 21:58










            • $begingroup$
              I assure BCT is the Baire Category Theorem, but what is DC?
              $endgroup$
              – Viktor Glombik
              Dec 18 '18 at 22:15










            • $begingroup$
              @Viktor: Dependent Choice. It is a weak form of choice (or a strong form of countable choice).
              $endgroup$
              – Asaf Karagila♦
              Dec 18 '18 at 22:19


















            • $begingroup$
              Well, BCT is generally equivalent to DC. So just saying "Oh BCT shows ..." is not enough to conclude that choice was not needed. But noting that the irrationals are separable is enough to finish the claim.
              $endgroup$
              – Asaf Karagila♦
              Dec 18 '18 at 21:58










            • $begingroup$
              I assure BCT is the Baire Category Theorem, but what is DC?
              $endgroup$
              – Viktor Glombik
              Dec 18 '18 at 22:15










            • $begingroup$
              @Viktor: Dependent Choice. It is a weak form of choice (or a strong form of countable choice).
              $endgroup$
              – Asaf Karagila♦
              Dec 18 '18 at 22:19
















            $begingroup$
            Well, BCT is generally equivalent to DC. So just saying "Oh BCT shows ..." is not enough to conclude that choice was not needed. But noting that the irrationals are separable is enough to finish the claim.
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Karagila♦
            Dec 18 '18 at 21:58




            $begingroup$
            Well, BCT is generally equivalent to DC. So just saying "Oh BCT shows ..." is not enough to conclude that choice was not needed. But noting that the irrationals are separable is enough to finish the claim.
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Karagila♦
            Dec 18 '18 at 21:58












            $begingroup$
            I assure BCT is the Baire Category Theorem, but what is DC?
            $endgroup$
            – Viktor Glombik
            Dec 18 '18 at 22:15




            $begingroup$
            I assure BCT is the Baire Category Theorem, but what is DC?
            $endgroup$
            – Viktor Glombik
            Dec 18 '18 at 22:15












            $begingroup$
            @Viktor: Dependent Choice. It is a weak form of choice (or a strong form of countable choice).
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Karagila♦
            Dec 18 '18 at 22:19




            $begingroup$
            @Viktor: Dependent Choice. It is a weak form of choice (or a strong form of countable choice).
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Karagila♦
            Dec 18 '18 at 22:19


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045755%2fnot-sigma-compact-set-without-axiom-of-choice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Image
            Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
            Read more

            Verónica Boquete

            Image
            Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
            Read more

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

            Image
            Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
            Read more