differential of a contracted product with a 3 order tensor and uniform vectors












0












$begingroup$


I would like to know if expression of $text{d}(u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t})$ is equal to zero.



Indeed, I consider a 3 order tensor (actually (1,2) tensor) $u^{r}_{st}$ contracted with uniform vectors $a_{r}$, $b^{s}$, $c^{t}$ and I know this contracted product is an invariant towards basis where it is expressed.



But invariant doesn't imply necessary a constant, such the differential of contracted product, i.e $text{d}(u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t})$, would be always equal to zero, does it ?



Here the equation of differential :



$$begin{equation}
begin{array}[b]{lcl}
text{d}(u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t})&=&(partial_{k},u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t}+u^{r}_{st},partial_{k},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t}\
&+&u^{r}_{st},a_{r},partial_{k},b^{s},c^{t}+u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},partial_{k},c^{t}),text{d}y^{k}
end{array}
end{equation}$$



If I consider uniform vectors $a_{r}$, $b^{s}$, $c^{t}$, I can demonstrate the expression of covariant derivative of tensor $u^{r}_{st}$ :



$$begin{equation}
nabla_{k},u^{r}_{st}=partial_{k},u^{r}_{st}+u^{i}_{st},Gamma_{ki}^{r}-u^{r}_{it},Gamma^{i}_{ks}-u^{r}_{si},Gamma^{i}_{kt}
end{equation}$$



But my real question is to know if $$text{d}(u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t})=0$$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I would like to know if expression of $text{d}(u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t})$ is equal to zero.



    Indeed, I consider a 3 order tensor (actually (1,2) tensor) $u^{r}_{st}$ contracted with uniform vectors $a_{r}$, $b^{s}$, $c^{t}$ and I know this contracted product is an invariant towards basis where it is expressed.



    But invariant doesn't imply necessary a constant, such the differential of contracted product, i.e $text{d}(u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t})$, would be always equal to zero, does it ?



    Here the equation of differential :



    $$begin{equation}
    begin{array}[b]{lcl}
    text{d}(u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t})&=&(partial_{k},u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t}+u^{r}_{st},partial_{k},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t}\
    &+&u^{r}_{st},a_{r},partial_{k},b^{s},c^{t}+u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},partial_{k},c^{t}),text{d}y^{k}
    end{array}
    end{equation}$$



    If I consider uniform vectors $a_{r}$, $b^{s}$, $c^{t}$, I can demonstrate the expression of covariant derivative of tensor $u^{r}_{st}$ :



    $$begin{equation}
    nabla_{k},u^{r}_{st}=partial_{k},u^{r}_{st}+u^{i}_{st},Gamma_{ki}^{r}-u^{r}_{it},Gamma^{i}_{ks}-u^{r}_{si},Gamma^{i}_{kt}
    end{equation}$$



    But my real question is to know if $$text{d}(u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t})=0$$










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I would like to know if expression of $text{d}(u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t})$ is equal to zero.



      Indeed, I consider a 3 order tensor (actually (1,2) tensor) $u^{r}_{st}$ contracted with uniform vectors $a_{r}$, $b^{s}$, $c^{t}$ and I know this contracted product is an invariant towards basis where it is expressed.



      But invariant doesn't imply necessary a constant, such the differential of contracted product, i.e $text{d}(u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t})$, would be always equal to zero, does it ?



      Here the equation of differential :



      $$begin{equation}
      begin{array}[b]{lcl}
      text{d}(u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t})&=&(partial_{k},u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t}+u^{r}_{st},partial_{k},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t}\
      &+&u^{r}_{st},a_{r},partial_{k},b^{s},c^{t}+u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},partial_{k},c^{t}),text{d}y^{k}
      end{array}
      end{equation}$$



      If I consider uniform vectors $a_{r}$, $b^{s}$, $c^{t}$, I can demonstrate the expression of covariant derivative of tensor $u^{r}_{st}$ :



      $$begin{equation}
      nabla_{k},u^{r}_{st}=partial_{k},u^{r}_{st}+u^{i}_{st},Gamma_{ki}^{r}-u^{r}_{it},Gamma^{i}_{ks}-u^{r}_{si},Gamma^{i}_{kt}
      end{equation}$$



      But my real question is to know if $$text{d}(u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t})=0$$










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I would like to know if expression of $text{d}(u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t})$ is equal to zero.



      Indeed, I consider a 3 order tensor (actually (1,2) tensor) $u^{r}_{st}$ contracted with uniform vectors $a_{r}$, $b^{s}$, $c^{t}$ and I know this contracted product is an invariant towards basis where it is expressed.



      But invariant doesn't imply necessary a constant, such the differential of contracted product, i.e $text{d}(u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t})$, would be always equal to zero, does it ?



      Here the equation of differential :



      $$begin{equation}
      begin{array}[b]{lcl}
      text{d}(u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t})&=&(partial_{k},u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t}+u^{r}_{st},partial_{k},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t}\
      &+&u^{r}_{st},a_{r},partial_{k},b^{s},c^{t}+u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},partial_{k},c^{t}),text{d}y^{k}
      end{array}
      end{equation}$$



      If I consider uniform vectors $a_{r}$, $b^{s}$, $c^{t}$, I can demonstrate the expression of covariant derivative of tensor $u^{r}_{st}$ :



      $$begin{equation}
      nabla_{k},u^{r}_{st}=partial_{k},u^{r}_{st}+u^{i}_{st},Gamma_{ki}^{r}-u^{r}_{it},Gamma^{i}_{ks}-u^{r}_{si},Gamma^{i}_{kt}
      end{equation}$$



      But my real question is to know if $$text{d}(u^{r}_{st},a_{r},b^{s},c^{t})=0$$







      differential-geometry tensors tensor-rank






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 18 '18 at 21:15









      youpilat13youpilat13

      2811




      2811






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045705%2fdifferential-of-a-contracted-product-with-a-3-order-tensor-and-uniform-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045705%2fdifferential-of-a-contracted-product-with-a-3-order-tensor-and-uniform-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Verónica Boquete

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten