Absolute maximum for $f(x,y) = 4x^2 + 5y$












0












$begingroup$


Suppose you have a region $R$ that satisfies $4x^2+y^2leq 4$ What is the absolute maximum of the function $f(x,y) = 4x^2 + 5y$ on $R$?



The correct answer is $10$



First, I calculated the critical points in $R$:



$$f_x = 8x$$
$$8x= 0$$
$$x=0$$



$$f_y = 5$$
$$5 ne 0$$



Given the fact that there are no points where both $f_x$ and $f_y$ equal $0$, doesn't that mean there are no critical points in $R$, indicating no maximum value? I don't know if I have to check the boundary in this case, since the region is circular? I am not allowed to use Lagrange Multipliers.



Any insight into how to solve these types of problems would help.






multivariable-calculus optimization







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    On the boundary substitute $x^2$ from the equation of the boundary into $f(x,y)$ and find and minimise over $y$.
    $endgroup$
    – user121049
    Dec 10 '18 at 8:41
















0












$begingroup$


Suppose you have a region $R$ that satisfies $4x^2+y^2leq 4$ What is the absolute maximum of the function $f(x,y) = 4x^2 + 5y$ on $R$?



The correct answer is $10$



First, I calculated the critical points in $R$:



$$f_x = 8x$$
$$8x= 0$$
$$x=0$$



$$f_y = 5$$
$$5 ne 0$$



Given the fact that there are no points where both $f_x$ and $f_y$ equal $0$, doesn't that mean there are no critical points in $R$, indicating no maximum value? I don't know if I have to check the boundary in this case, since the region is circular? I am not allowed to use Lagrange Multipliers.



Any insight into how to solve these types of problems would help.






multivariable-calculus optimization







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    On the boundary substitute $x^2$ from the equation of the boundary into $f(x,y)$ and find and minimise over $y$.
    $endgroup$
    – user121049
    Dec 10 '18 at 8:41














0












0








0


3



$begingroup$


Suppose you have a region $R$ that satisfies $4x^2+y^2leq 4$ What is the absolute maximum of the function $f(x,y) = 4x^2 + 5y$ on $R$?



The correct answer is $10$



First, I calculated the critical points in $R$:



$$f_x = 8x$$
$$8x= 0$$
$$x=0$$



$$f_y = 5$$
$$5 ne 0$$



Given the fact that there are no points where both $f_x$ and $f_y$ equal $0$, doesn't that mean there are no critical points in $R$, indicating no maximum value? I don't know if I have to check the boundary in this case, since the region is circular? I am not allowed to use Lagrange Multipliers.



Any insight into how to solve these types of problems would help.






multivariable-calculus optimization







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Suppose you have a region $R$ that satisfies $4x^2+y^2leq 4$ What is the absolute maximum of the function $f(x,y) = 4x^2 + 5y$ on $R$?



The correct answer is $10$



First, I calculated the critical points in $R$:



$$f_x = 8x$$
$$8x= 0$$
$$x=0$$



$$f_y = 5$$
$$5 ne 0$$



Given the fact that there are no points where both $f_x$ and $f_y$ equal $0$, doesn't that mean there are no critical points in $R$, indicating no maximum value? I don't know if I have to check the boundary in this case, since the region is circular? I am not allowed to use Lagrange Multipliers.



Any insight into how to solve these types of problems would help.






multivariable-calculus optimization




multivariable-calculus optimization






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 10 '18 at 8:46







Art

















asked Dec 10 '18 at 8:36









ArtArt

31918




31918












  • $begingroup$
    On the boundary substitute $x^2$ from the equation of the boundary into $f(x,y)$ and find and minimise over $y$.
    $endgroup$
    – user121049
    Dec 10 '18 at 8:41


















  • $begingroup$
    On the boundary substitute $x^2$ from the equation of the boundary into $f(x,y)$ and find and minimise over $y$.
    $endgroup$
    – user121049
    Dec 10 '18 at 8:41
















$begingroup$
On the boundary substitute $x^2$ from the equation of the boundary into $f(x,y)$ and find and minimise over $y$.
$endgroup$
– user121049
Dec 10 '18 at 8:41




$begingroup$
On the boundary substitute $x^2$ from the equation of the boundary into $f(x,y)$ and find and minimise over $y$.
$endgroup$
– user121049
Dec 10 '18 at 8:41










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The function $f(x)=x$ also has an absolute maximum on $[-1,1]$, even though there is no point at which $f'(x)=0$.



Remember, the zeroes of the partial derivatives only give you candidates for the critical points in the interior of the domain of $f$. On the border (where a maximum can also be reached sometimes), you can use Lagrange multipliers to calculate the max.



Alternatively, your particular function is fairly simple, so you can do without Lagrange. You have, on the border, $4x^2+y^2=4$, which means you can express $x^2$ as a funciton of $y$, and insert that into $f(x,y)$ to get a function of only $y$, and you can calculate the maximum of $f$ on the border quite easily.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    When the function is defined by a simple expression ad-hoc methods are recommended. You can find the maximum without using any theorems. $f(x,y) leq 5y+4-y^{2}$ and $y$ is subject to the condition $-2leq y leq 2$. This gives $f(x,y)leq 10$ and this value is attained when $x=0,y=2$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      You proved that there are no critical points in the interior of $R$. In order to see what happens at the boundary of $R$, you can use the method of Lagrange multipliers, which leads you to the system:$$left{begin{array}{l}8x=8lambda x\5=8lambda y\4x^2+y^2=4.end{array}right.$$


      Otherwise, you can reduce this to a $1$-dimensional problem: find the maximum of$$(4costheta)^2+5times4sintheta,$$with $thetain[0,2pi]$. It is perhaps better to keep in mind that $cos^2theta+sin^2theta=1$.




      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        I am expected to solve it w/o Lagrange. Is there an alternative?
        $endgroup$
        – Art
        Dec 10 '18 at 8:45






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        I've edited my answer. What do you think now?
        $endgroup$
        – José Carlos Santos
        Dec 10 '18 at 8:51



















      0












      $begingroup$

      We have: $4x^2 + 5y le 4-y^2+5y =10 -y^2+5y-6=10 -(y-2)(y-3)le 10$ since $y le 2$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033641%2fabsolute-maximum-for-fx-y-4x2-5y%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        2












        $begingroup$

        The function $f(x)=x$ also has an absolute maximum on $[-1,1]$, even though there is no point at which $f'(x)=0$.



        Remember, the zeroes of the partial derivatives only give you candidates for the critical points in the interior of the domain of $f$. On the border (where a maximum can also be reached sometimes), you can use Lagrange multipliers to calculate the max.



        Alternatively, your particular function is fairly simple, so you can do without Lagrange. You have, on the border, $4x^2+y^2=4$, which means you can express $x^2$ as a funciton of $y$, and insert that into $f(x,y)$ to get a function of only $y$, and you can calculate the maximum of $f$ on the border quite easily.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$


















          2












          $begingroup$

          The function $f(x)=x$ also has an absolute maximum on $[-1,1]$, even though there is no point at which $f'(x)=0$.



          Remember, the zeroes of the partial derivatives only give you candidates for the critical points in the interior of the domain of $f$. On the border (where a maximum can also be reached sometimes), you can use Lagrange multipliers to calculate the max.



          Alternatively, your particular function is fairly simple, so you can do without Lagrange. You have, on the border, $4x^2+y^2=4$, which means you can express $x^2$ as a funciton of $y$, and insert that into $f(x,y)$ to get a function of only $y$, and you can calculate the maximum of $f$ on the border quite easily.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$
















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            The function $f(x)=x$ also has an absolute maximum on $[-1,1]$, even though there is no point at which $f'(x)=0$.



            Remember, the zeroes of the partial derivatives only give you candidates for the critical points in the interior of the domain of $f$. On the border (where a maximum can also be reached sometimes), you can use Lagrange multipliers to calculate the max.



            Alternatively, your particular function is fairly simple, so you can do without Lagrange. You have, on the border, $4x^2+y^2=4$, which means you can express $x^2$ as a funciton of $y$, and insert that into $f(x,y)$ to get a function of only $y$, and you can calculate the maximum of $f$ on the border quite easily.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            The function $f(x)=x$ also has an absolute maximum on $[-1,1]$, even though there is no point at which $f'(x)=0$.



            Remember, the zeroes of the partial derivatives only give you candidates for the critical points in the interior of the domain of $f$. On the border (where a maximum can also be reached sometimes), you can use Lagrange multipliers to calculate the max.



            Alternatively, your particular function is fairly simple, so you can do without Lagrange. You have, on the border, $4x^2+y^2=4$, which means you can express $x^2$ as a funciton of $y$, and insert that into $f(x,y)$ to get a function of only $y$, and you can calculate the maximum of $f$ on the border quite easily.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Dec 10 '18 at 8:48

























            answered Dec 10 '18 at 8:40









            5xum5xum

            90.8k394161




            90.8k394161























                2












                $begingroup$

                When the function is defined by a simple expression ad-hoc methods are recommended. You can find the maximum without using any theorems. $f(x,y) leq 5y+4-y^{2}$ and $y$ is subject to the condition $-2leq y leq 2$. This gives $f(x,y)leq 10$ and this value is attained when $x=0,y=2$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  When the function is defined by a simple expression ad-hoc methods are recommended. You can find the maximum without using any theorems. $f(x,y) leq 5y+4-y^{2}$ and $y$ is subject to the condition $-2leq y leq 2$. This gives $f(x,y)leq 10$ and this value is attained when $x=0,y=2$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    When the function is defined by a simple expression ad-hoc methods are recommended. You can find the maximum without using any theorems. $f(x,y) leq 5y+4-y^{2}$ and $y$ is subject to the condition $-2leq y leq 2$. This gives $f(x,y)leq 10$ and this value is attained when $x=0,y=2$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    When the function is defined by a simple expression ad-hoc methods are recommended. You can find the maximum without using any theorems. $f(x,y) leq 5y+4-y^{2}$ and $y$ is subject to the condition $-2leq y leq 2$. This gives $f(x,y)leq 10$ and this value is attained when $x=0,y=2$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Dec 10 '18 at 8:46









                    Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

                    60.5k42161




                    60.5k42161























                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        You proved that there are no critical points in the interior of $R$. In order to see what happens at the boundary of $R$, you can use the method of Lagrange multipliers, which leads you to the system:$$left{begin{array}{l}8x=8lambda x\5=8lambda y\4x^2+y^2=4.end{array}right.$$


                        Otherwise, you can reduce this to a $1$-dimensional problem: find the maximum of$$(4costheta)^2+5times4sintheta,$$with $thetain[0,2pi]$. It is perhaps better to keep in mind that $cos^2theta+sin^2theta=1$.




                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$













                        • $begingroup$
                          I am expected to solve it w/o Lagrange. Is there an alternative?
                          $endgroup$
                          – Art
                          Dec 10 '18 at 8:45






                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          I've edited my answer. What do you think now?
                          $endgroup$
                          – José Carlos Santos
                          Dec 10 '18 at 8:51
















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        You proved that there are no critical points in the interior of $R$. In order to see what happens at the boundary of $R$, you can use the method of Lagrange multipliers, which leads you to the system:$$left{begin{array}{l}8x=8lambda x\5=8lambda y\4x^2+y^2=4.end{array}right.$$


                        Otherwise, you can reduce this to a $1$-dimensional problem: find the maximum of$$(4costheta)^2+5times4sintheta,$$with $thetain[0,2pi]$. It is perhaps better to keep in mind that $cos^2theta+sin^2theta=1$.




                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$













                        • $begingroup$
                          I am expected to solve it w/o Lagrange. Is there an alternative?
                          $endgroup$
                          – Art
                          Dec 10 '18 at 8:45






                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          I've edited my answer. What do you think now?
                          $endgroup$
                          – José Carlos Santos
                          Dec 10 '18 at 8:51














                        1












                        1








                        1





                        $begingroup$

                        You proved that there are no critical points in the interior of $R$. In order to see what happens at the boundary of $R$, you can use the method of Lagrange multipliers, which leads you to the system:$$left{begin{array}{l}8x=8lambda x\5=8lambda y\4x^2+y^2=4.end{array}right.$$


                        Otherwise, you can reduce this to a $1$-dimensional problem: find the maximum of$$(4costheta)^2+5times4sintheta,$$with $thetain[0,2pi]$. It is perhaps better to keep in mind that $cos^2theta+sin^2theta=1$.




                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$



                        You proved that there are no critical points in the interior of $R$. In order to see what happens at the boundary of $R$, you can use the method of Lagrange multipliers, which leads you to the system:$$left{begin{array}{l}8x=8lambda x\5=8lambda y\4x^2+y^2=4.end{array}right.$$


                        Otherwise, you can reduce this to a $1$-dimensional problem: find the maximum of$$(4costheta)^2+5times4sintheta,$$with $thetain[0,2pi]$. It is perhaps better to keep in mind that $cos^2theta+sin^2theta=1$.





                        share|cite|improve this answer














                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        edited Dec 10 '18 at 8:51

























                        answered Dec 10 '18 at 8:42









                        José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

                        161k22128232




                        161k22128232












                        • $begingroup$
                          I am expected to solve it w/o Lagrange. Is there an alternative?
                          $endgroup$
                          – Art
                          Dec 10 '18 at 8:45






                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          I've edited my answer. What do you think now?
                          $endgroup$
                          – José Carlos Santos
                          Dec 10 '18 at 8:51


















                        • $begingroup$
                          I am expected to solve it w/o Lagrange. Is there an alternative?
                          $endgroup$
                          – Art
                          Dec 10 '18 at 8:45






                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          I've edited my answer. What do you think now?
                          $endgroup$
                          – José Carlos Santos
                          Dec 10 '18 at 8:51
















                        $begingroup$
                        I am expected to solve it w/o Lagrange. Is there an alternative?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Art
                        Dec 10 '18 at 8:45




                        $begingroup$
                        I am expected to solve it w/o Lagrange. Is there an alternative?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Art
                        Dec 10 '18 at 8:45




                        1




                        1




                        $begingroup$
                        I've edited my answer. What do you think now?
                        $endgroup$
                        – José Carlos Santos
                        Dec 10 '18 at 8:51




                        $begingroup$
                        I've edited my answer. What do you think now?
                        $endgroup$
                        – José Carlos Santos
                        Dec 10 '18 at 8:51











                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        We have: $4x^2 + 5y le 4-y^2+5y =10 -y^2+5y-6=10 -(y-2)(y-3)le 10$ since $y le 2$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          We have: $4x^2 + 5y le 4-y^2+5y =10 -y^2+5y-6=10 -(y-2)(y-3)le 10$ since $y le 2$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            We have: $4x^2 + 5y le 4-y^2+5y =10 -y^2+5y-6=10 -(y-2)(y-3)le 10$ since $y le 2$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            We have: $4x^2 + 5y le 4-y^2+5y =10 -y^2+5y-6=10 -(y-2)(y-3)le 10$ since $y le 2$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Dec 10 '18 at 8:50









                            DeepSeaDeepSea

                            71.2k54487




                            71.2k54487






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid …



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033641%2fabsolute-maximum-for-fx-y-4x2-5y%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                -

                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Bundesstraße 106

                                Image
                                Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
                                Read more

                                Verónica Boquete

                                Image
                                Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
                                Read more

                                Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                                Image
                                Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
                                Read more